PH12b 2010 Solutions HW#3

Similar documents
Quantum Mechanics Qualifying Exam - August 2016 Notes and Instructions

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Quantum Mechanics I (8.04) Spring 2005 Solutions to Problem Set 6

Chapter 5. , r = r 1 r 2 (1) µ = m 1 m 2. r, r 2 = R µ m 2. R(m 1 + m 2 ) + m 2 r = r 1. m 2. r = r 1. R + µ m 1

Energy Bands Energy Bands and Band Gap. Phys463.nb Phenomenon

Name Solutions to Test 3 November 8, 2017

Physics 215 Quantum Mechanics 1 Assignment 2

Homework Problem Set 1 Solutions

September 13 Homework Solutions

Minimal DFA. minimal DFA for L starting from any other

Review of Gaussian Quadrature method

PHY4605 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics II Spring 2005 Final exam SOLUTIONS April 22, 2005

Intermediate Math Circles Wednesday, November 14, 2018 Finite Automata II. Nickolas Rollick a b b. a b 4

Section 6: Area, Volume, and Average Value

Problem Set 2 Solutions

Describe in words how you interpret this quantity. Precisely what information do you get from x?

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2005 Solution Set 5

2. VECTORS AND MATRICES IN 3 DIMENSIONS

The solutions of the single electron Hamiltonian were shown to be Bloch wave of the form: ( ) ( ) ikr

Lecture 2e Orthogonal Complement (pages )

Physics 137A - Quantum Mechanics - Spring 2018 Midterm 1. Mathematical Formulas

Physics 116C Solution of inhomogeneous ordinary differential equations using Green s functions

NOTES ON HILBERT SPACE

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2013 Assignment 2

221B Lecture Notes WKB Method

Linear Systems with Constant Coefficients

Math 4310 Solutions to homework 1 Due 9/1/16

Chapter 14. Matrix Representations of Linear Transformations

dx x x = 1 and + dx α x x α x = + dx α ˆx x x α = α ˆx α as required, in the last equality we used completeness relation +

Practice Problems Solution

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Spring 2013 Anant Sahai Lecture 17

Partial Derivatives. Limits. For a single variable function f (x), the limit lim

Ph2b Quiz - 1. Instructions

Chapter 9 Many Electron Atoms

Chapter 3 The Schrödinger Equation and a Particle in a Box

4. Calculus of Variations

Quantum Physics I (8.04) Spring 2016 Assignment 8

221A Lecture Notes WKB Method

Unit #9 : Definite Integral Properties; Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

Lecture 3. In this lecture, we will discuss algorithms for solving systems of linear equations.

Math 61CM - Solutions to homework 9

7.2 The Definite Integral

Solutions to Homework Set 3

The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. The Total Change Theorem and the Area Under a Curve.

Riemann Sums and Riemann Integrals

Sect 10.2 Trigonometric Ratios

Do the one-dimensional kinetic energy and momentum operators commute? If not, what operator does their commutator represent?

Physics 741 Graduate Quantum Mechanics 1 Solutions to Final Exam, Fall 2011

4.1. Probability Density Functions

Numerical integration

C/CS/Phys C191 Bell Inequalities, No Cloning, Teleportation 9/13/07 Fall 2007 Lecture 6

Chapter 0. What is the Lebesgue integral about?

Improper Integrals. Type I Improper Integrals How do we evaluate an integral such as

set is not closed under matrix [ multiplication, ] and does not form a group.

MATH34032: Green s Functions, Integral Equations and the Calculus of Variations 1

Exam 2, Mathematics 4701, Section ETY6 6:05 pm 7:40 pm, March 31, 2016, IH-1105 Instructor: Attila Máté 1

Week 10: Line Integrals

Coalgebra, Lecture 15: Equations for Deterministic Automata

Improper Integrals. The First Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, as we ve discussed in class, goes as follows:

University of. d Class. 3 st Lecture. 2 nd

Aike ikx Bike ikx. = 2k. solving for. A = k iκ

Theoretical foundations of Gaussian quadrature

Continuous Quantum Systems

Continuous Random Variables Class 5, Jeremy Orloff and Jonathan Bloom

Problem Set 3 Solutions

How do we solve these things, especially when they get complicated? How do we know when a system has a solution, and when is it unique?

Abstract inner product spaces

( ) 2. ( ) is the Fourier transform of! ( x). ( ) ( ) ( ) = Ae i kx"#t ( ) = 1 2" ( )"( x,t) PC 3101 Quantum Mechanics Section 1

Section 4: Integration ECO4112F 2011

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Summer 2014 James Cook Note 17

Riemann Sums and Riemann Integrals

Vectors , (0,0). 5. A vector is commonly denoted by putting an arrow above its symbol, as in the picture above. Here are some 3-dimensional vectors:

CS 373, Spring Solutions to Mock midterm 1 (Based on first midterm in CS 273, Fall 2008.)

Designing Information Devices and Systems I Discussion 8B

Chapter 4 Contravariance, Covariance, and Spacetime Diagrams

1. For each of the following theorems, give a two or three sentence sketch of how the proof goes or why it is not true.

APPENDIX. Precalculus Review D.1. Real Numbers and the Real Number Line

Riemann is the Mann! (But Lebesgue may besgue to differ.)

n f(x i ) x. i=1 In section 4.2, we defined the definite integral of f from x = a to x = b as n f(x i ) x; f(x) dx = lim i=1

THE EXISTENCE-UNIQUENESS THEOREM FOR FIRST-ORDER DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS.

Improper Integrals. Introduction. Type 1: Improper Integrals on Infinite Intervals. When we defined the definite integral.

Math Theory of Partial Differential Equations Lecture 2-9: Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problems (continued).

10 Vector Integral Calculus

Section 6.1 INTRO to LAPLACE TRANSFORMS

Polynomials and Division Theory

LINEAR ALGEBRA APPLIED

Matrix Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors September 13, 2017

2.4 Linear Inequalities and Interval Notation

Physics 202H - Introductory Quantum Physics I Homework #08 - Solutions Fall 2004 Due 5:01 PM, Monday 2004/11/15

63. Representation of functions as power series Consider a power series. ( 1) n x 2n for all 1 < x < 1

Quantum Nonlocality Pt. 2: No-Signaling and Local Hidden Variables May 1, / 16

f(x) dx, If one of these two conditions is not met, we call the integral improper. Our usual definition for the value for the definite integral

The Dirichlet Problem in a Two Dimensional Rectangle. Section 13.5

Spacetime and the Quantum World Questions Fall 2010

STURM-LIOUVILLE BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS

NUMERICAL INTEGRATION. The inverse process to differentiation in calculus is integration. Mathematically, integration is represented by.

Parse trees, ambiguity, and Chomsky normal form

Solutions to Problems in Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics, Third Edition. Chapter 7

Wave Equation on a Two Dimensional Rectangle

Green s functions. f(t) =

Bridging the gap: GCSE AS Level

Transcription:

PH 00 Solutions HW#3. The Hmiltonin of this two level system is where E g < E e The experimentlist sis is H E g jgi hgj + E e jei hej j+i p (jgi + jei) j i p (jgi jei) ) At t 0 the stte is j (0)i j+i, then, the stte will evolve s j (t)i p jgi + e i!t jei where! (E e E g )h nd we used the fct j (t)i is de ned up to overll phse fctor, i.e. j (t)i e iegth j (t)i Then the proility of + outcome nd - outcome if j (0)i j+i re P t + (+) jh+ j (t)ij + e i!t!t ( +!t) P t + ( ) jh j (t)ij e i!t!t (!t) P t + (+) + P t + ( ) s expected. ) First, it is esy to see tht if t t 0 the stte is j (0)i j - outcome if j (0)i j i re i then the proility of + outcome nd P t (+) P + t ( ) P t ( ) P + t (+) Now, we wnt to nd P t + (+ ) nd P t + ( ) the proility of + outcome nd - outcome fter mesurements ech done t intervl t if j (0)i j+i We cn get + outcome in two wys, the rst mesurement is + nd the second + or the rst mesurement is - nd the second is +. Rememer tht if the rst mesurement is + or - the stte will collpse to + or - respectively (i.e. j (t)i j+i or j i) nd will strt evolving gin. Then, similrly P + t (+ ) P + t (+) P + t (+) + P + t ( ) P t (+) P + t (+) P + t (+) + P + t ( ) P + t ( ) ( +!t) + (!t) +!t P + t ( ) P + t (+) P + t ( ) + P + t ( ) P t ( ) P + t (+) P + t ( )!t ) We re going to perform N mesurements t equl t intervls. Since we wnt the proility tht in ll the mesurements we get + outcome this is equl to the proility of doing Nth times the experiment in ) nd getting + outcome in ech one, ecuse if we get + outcome we re collpg the stte to j+i so this is like if we strt the experiment gin. Then P + N P + t (+) N N!t

d) Ug T Nt we get P + N N!t!T N N!T N + O N N "! T!T + O N N 3 N + O N # N Then f(wt )! T We cn conclude tht wtched quntum stte never evolve ecuse P + N! s N! with!t xed.. ) The proility of n inconclusive result is P (exit). Then, the proility of otining the inconclusive result N times in succession is just P () N ) If the om is good nd we repite the test s mny times s necessry until tht eventully either the om explodes or the test yields conclusive result, then the proility P Explode tht the om eventully explodes is P Explode P (explode) + P (inconclusive)p Explode + P Explode where P (explode) nd P (inconclusive) P (exit). Then we get, P Explode 3 Similrly, the proility P Conclusive tht the test eventully yields to conclusive result is P Conclusive P (conclusive) + P (inconclusive)p Conclusive + P Conclusive ) P Conclusive 3 Note tht P Conclusive + P Explode s expected. c) First notice tht ( + ) ( + ) ( + ) ( + ) then it is esy to see tht V N N N N N N 0 0 d) If the input stte is V in ( 0) T then fter the rst em splitter V out N T N This mens tht if the om is good then it will explode with the proility of nding the stte jouti tht is P (explode) N If it does not explode then, P (not explode) N nd the postmesurement stte will collpse to jouti This mens tht the input stte for the next em splitter is gin V in ( 0) T, so we re just repeting the experiment gin. Therefore, the proility tht it does not

explode fter N em splitters is the sme thn the proility tht it does not explode fter mking the gle em splitter experiment N times. Then then P (not explode) N N N N + O N N + O N c e) If the om does not explode the stte tht enters the lst em splitter will e jouti nd it will e trnsform y the lst em splitter to jouti! N jexiti+ N jexiti then P (exit). N And P (exitjnot explode) P (exit) N N + O N Then, 3. Alice sis is where 0 Bo sis is j i je i d j i je i where 0 ) The experiment hs four possile outcomes with proilities prepremesure he j he j j i P jhe j ij P jhe j ij j i P jhe j ij P jhe j ij where P P is the proility tht the stte ws prepre y Alice in j i or j i The o digonl outcomes in the tle represent the wrong guesses of Bo, therefore the proility tht Bo guess is wrong is P error jhe j ij + jhe j ij ) The overlps etween the sis re he j i ( + ) he j i ( ) then P error ( + ) + ( ) + c) Becuse 0 then 0 This implies tht P error is minimized when 0, then min 0 P min error () d) For 0 Perror min (0) 0, this mke sense ce for 0 j i i je i i nd h j i 0 so the sis re orthogonl. For Perror min (), this mke sense ce for the two sttes re the sme j i j i p nd there is equl chnce of Alice hving prepred j i or j i. 3

e) Evluting we get Perror min (8) p 06 The sketch is just je i in the x-xis, je i in the y-xis, j i mking n ngle of 8 rdins with the x-xis, nd j i mking n ngle of 8 with the y-xis. All four vectors hve unit length.. The wlls of the one-dimensionl ox re t x nd The wvefunction is r x (x) hxj i x ) The proility density of the prticle to e t some x is The proility tht scttered light is detected is P (x) j (x)j (x) (x) x P scttered P (x)dx ( ) + ) [ ] [ 38], sustituting in ) we get P scttered 8 p 0078 c) (Elorte Answer) First we hve to de ne the opertor tht mke the mesurement. The opertor tht detects prticle t some point x 0 is given y jx 0 i hx 0 j dx. Then the Hermitin opertor tht detects prticle in the intervl [ ] is The wve function is O j i jx 0 i hx 0 j dx 0 (y) jyi dy The eigenvlue eqution for this opertor is O j i j i this is O j i (y) jx 0 i hx 0 jyi dydx 0 (y) jx 0 i (x 0 y) dydx 0 (y) jyi dy (y) jyi dy the lst line cn just e stisfy if 0 nd (y) is zero in the intervl [ ] ie just hve support in the complement of the intervl [ ] or if nd (y) just hve support in the intervl [ ] Then the eigenvlues nd the degenerte eigenvector of the opertor re 0 jx 0 i hx 0 j dx 0 x 0 [ ) [ ( ] jx 0 i hx 0 j dx 0 x 0 [ ]

From the lecture notes "Quntum postultes III" we know tht if the outcome 0 is otined, the normlized stte right fter the mesurement is Q0 j i fter q h j Q 0 j i where Q 0 is the orthogonl projector to the spce of eigenvectors with 0, i.e. Then we hve Q 0 j i Q 0 jx 0 i hx 0 j dx 0 + (y) hx 0 j yi jx 0 i dx 0 dy + (y)(x 0 y) jx 0 i dx 0 dy + (x 0 ) jx 0 i dx 0 + jx 0 i hx 0 j dx 0 (x 0 ) jx 0 i dx 0 (y) hx 0 j yi jx 0 i dx 0 dy (y) jx 0 i (x 0 y)dx 0 dy where we used hx 0 j yi (x 0 y) nd (x 0 y) is Dirc Delt functionthis just mens tht the wve function fter the mesurement is proportionl to hxj i hxj Q (x) x [ ) [ ( ] 0 j i 0 x [ ] Finlly we hve to normlized the wve function fter the mesurement, this is done y the fctor q h j Q 0Q0 j i p hj i where we used Q 0Q0 Q 0 Now, it is esy to see tht q h j Q 0 j i Therefore, hj i P scttered ( ) (x) x [ ) [ ( ] fter (x) hxj fter p Pscttered ( ) 0 x [ ] For [ ] [ ] P scttered ( ) 087 we hve ( q q x fter (x) ( ) x [ ) [ ( ] 0 x [ ] d) Becuse the wve function fter the mesurement in the intervl [ ] [ 38] is proportionl to the originl wve function we hve tht P fter scttered ( 38) P scttered( 38) 0078 087 03 where P scttered ( 38) comes from ). e) Chrlie s rgument is wrong. Although the light nd prticle do not interct this is mesurement ecuse we re getting the informtion tht the prticle is not in certin intervl. From the postultes of Quntum mechnics we know tht ny mesurement will collpse the wvefunction to new wvefunction s explin in c). In this process we need to normlize gin the wvefunction nd this will chnge the proility s we clculte in d). If Chrlie were right then the proility of nding the prticle in the entire ox fter the mesurement will not e one which is oviously wrong. 5