Application. Gas Chromatography March 1998

Similar documents
Application. Gas Chromatography February Introduction

Analysis of Trace (mg/kg) Thiophene in Benzene Using Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography and Flame Ionization Detection Application

Author. Abstract. Introduction

The Importance of Area and Retention Time Precision in Gas Chromatography Technical Note

Application Note. Author. Abstract. Introduction. Hydrocarbon Processing

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Luminescence transitions. Fluorescence spectroscopy

Analysis of Biomarkers in Crude Oil Using the Agilent 7200 GC/Q-TOF

Chromatographic Methods of Analysis Section: 5 Gas Chromatography (GC) Prof. Tarek A. Fayed

Analysis of USP Method <467> Residual Solvents on the Agilent 8890 GC System

The Analysis of Trace Contaminants in High Purity Ethylene and Propylene Using GC/MS. Application. Agilent Technologies/Wasson ECE Monomer Analyzer

Trace analysis of mesityl oxide and diacetone alcohol in pharmaceuticals by capillary gas chromatography with flame ionization detection

Application Note. Abstract. Authors. Introduction

Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals by USP Chapter <467> Methodology

The Determination of Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals Using the Agilent G1888 Network Headspace Sampler Application

Determination of Total Volatile Organic Compounds in Indoor Air Using Agilent 7667A mini TD and 7820A GC

Screening of Pesticide Residues in Water by Sequential Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction-Thermal Desorption with GC/MS

Quantification of Pesticides in Food without Calibration using GC/FID with the Polyarc Reactor

Determination of 17 Organotin Compounds in Beverages Using Triple Quadrupole GC-MS/MS System

VOC Analysis of Water-Based Coatings by Headspace-Gas Chromatography

Exceptional Selectivity of Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse Plus Phenyl-Hexyl Columns to Separate Estrogens

Determination of Volatile Aromatic Compounds in Soil by Manual SPME and Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MSD

Automated Sample Preparation of Headspace Standards Using the Agilent 7696 WorkBench

Fast Analysis of Aromatic Solvent with 0.18 mm ID GC column. Application. Authors. Introduction. Abstract. Gas Chromatography

Static Headspace Blood Alcohol Analysis with the G1888 Network Headspace Sampler Application

Sulfotepp impurities in Chlorpyrifos EC formulations

Forensic Toxicology. Analysis of Ethanol in Blood using Master SHS Static Headspace Sampler and Master GC Gas Chromatograph APPLICATION NOTE

Fast Analysis of USP 467 Residual Solvents using the Agilent 7890A GC and Low Thermal Mass (LTM) System

Application Note. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry/Food Safety. Abstract. Authors

PAHs in Parking Lot Sealcoats. Performance Study. Asphalt Based. Coal Tar Sealcoat Sealcoat. Sealcoat. Scrapings. Asphalt Based.

Fast, Quantitative Analysis of Residual Solvents in Cannabis Concentrates

Separation of Explosives in EPA 8330: Column Choices Optimize Speed, Resolution, and Solvent Use. Application. Authors. Abstract.

Agilent s New Weak Anion Exchange (WAX) Solid Phase Extraction Cartridges: SampliQ WAX

Chemistry Instrumental Analysis Lecture 27. Chem 4631

Analyze Hydrocarbon Impurities in 1,3-Butadiene with an Agilent J&W GS-Alumina PT Column

Title Experiment 7: Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry: Fuel Analysis

Application Note. Abstract. Authors. Introduction. Food Safety

Validation of New VPH GC/MS Method using Multi-Matrix Purge and Trap Sample Prep System

Accurate Analysis of Fuel Ethers and Oxygenates in a Single Injection without Calibration Standards using GC- Polyarc/FID. Application Note.

Fast USEPA 8270 Semivolatiles Analysis Using the 6890/5973 inert GC/MSD with Performance Electronics Application

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs):

Date 10/22/97 Page 1 Revision 4.1 OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY METHODS 8000/8100 (MODIFIED) DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS (DRO)

Study of Residual Solvents in Various Matrices by Static Headspace

Residual solvents analysis using an Agilent Intuvo 9000 GC system

Screening for Water Pollutants With the Agilent SureTarget GC/MSD Water Pollutants Screener, SureTarget Workflow, and Customized Reporting

Analysis of Ethanol and Isotopomers by 240 Quadrupole Ion Trap GC/MS

A Direct 5 ms Column Performance Comparison for Active Semi-Volatile Analytes

Gas Chromatography. Rosa Yu, David Reckhow CEE772 Instrumental Methods in Environmental Analysis CEE 772 #16 2

Simultaneous Estimation of Residual Solvents (Isopropyl Alcohol and Dichloromethane) in Dosage Form by GC-HS-FID

CH 2252 Instrumental Methods of Analysis Unit V Gas Chromatography. M. Subramanian

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP: 1828 PAGE: 1 of 14 REV: 0.0 DATE: 05/12/95 ANALYSIS OF METHYL PARATHION IN CARPET SAMPLES BY GC/MS

Analyzing Residual Solvents in Pharmaceutical Products Using GC Headspace with Valve-and-Loop Sampling

Headspace Technology for GC and GC/MS: Features, benefits & applications

Simultaneous dual capillary column headspace GC with flame ionization confirmation and quantification according to USP <467> Application Note

Determination of Off-Odor Compounds in Drinking Water Using an SPME Device with Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry

Chromatography. Gas Chromatography

GC Application Note. Dilution/standard addition: Efficient and traceable.

Agilent 1200 Infinity Series HDR DAD Impurity Analyzer System for the Quantification of Trace Level of Genotoxic Impurity

GC Analysis of Polybrominated Flame Retardants Application

Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in polluted air by an Agilent mini Thermal Desorber and an Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MS

Applying the Agilent 5977A MSD to the Analysis of USP<467> Residual Solvents with the 7697A Headspace Sampler and 7890B GC

Sensitive Detection of 2-MIB and Geosmin in Drinking Water

A Comparative Analysis of Fuel Oxygenates in Soil by Dynamic and Static Headspace Utilizing the HT3 TM Automatic Headspace Analyzer

GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY (GC)

Rapid Screening and Confirmation of Melamine Residues in Milk and Its Products by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Determination of Volatile Substances Proof of Food Adulteration

Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions. By: Anne Jurek

The Focus Robotic Sample Processor as a Tool for the Multiple Analysis of Samples using Complementary Techniques

Optimization of 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol Detection Using USEPA Method 8260 Application Note

Determination of Chlorinated Acid Herbicides in Soil by LC/MS/MS Application Note

Gas Chromatography (GC)! Environmental Organic Chemistry CEE-PUBH Analysis Topic 5

1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) and 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP), gas chromatography, microextraction

Improved Volatiles Analysis Using Static Headspace, the Agilent 5977B GC/MSD, and a High-efficiency Source

Pesticides Analysis Using the Agilent 5977A Series GC/MSD

Agilent G2350A Atomic Emission Detector (AED)

Analysis of Terpenes in Cannabis Using the Agilent 7697A/7890B/5977B Headspace GC-MSD System

Liquid storage: Holds the solvent which is going to act as the mobile phase. Pump: Pushes the solvent through to the column at high pressure.

PAH Analyses with High Efficiency GC Columns: Column Selection and Best Practices

OPTIMISATION OF SOLID PHASE MICROEXTRACTION (SPME) CONDITIONS FOR HEADSPACE ANALYSIS OF ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES IN WHOLE BLOOD

METHOD 8100 POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS

Identification and Quantitation of PCB Aroclor Mixtures in a Single Run Using the Agilent 7000B Triple Quadrupole GC/MS

AppNote 2/2000. Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE) applied to Environmental Aqueous Samples

METHOD 8030A ACROLEIN AND ACRYLONITRILE BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY

METHOD 3600B CLEANUP

Gas Chromatography. 1. Experiment Category: 2. Experiment Name: 3. Date and Issue number: 4. Instructor Name: 5. Institution: Ain Shams University

Fast Gas Chromatography using Heated Headspace Gas Auto Sampling Techniques: Ethylene Oxide and 1,4-Dioxane in Fatty Acids

UltiMetal Plus Advanced Chemistry for Stainless Steel Surface Deactivation

AppNote 2/1999. Automated Sample Fractionation and Analysis Using a Modular LC-GC System

U.S. EPA Method 8270 for multicomponent analyte determination

Identifying Pesticides with Full Scan, SIM, µecd, and FPD from a Single Injection Application

anthracene Figure 1: Structures of Selected Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)

High Pressure/Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

Analysis of Phthalates in Body Wash using Solid-Supported Liquid-Liquid Extraction

PA-DEP 3686, Rev. 1. Light Hydrocarbons in Aqueous Samples via Headspace and Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detection (GC/FID)

ChromTech options for PAL systems

Anethole. Gas chromatograhpy determination of trans-anethole in Spirit srinks of viti-vinicultural origin

A Fast, Simple FET Headspace GC-FID Technique for Determining Residual Solvents in Cannabis Concentrates

Agilent UltiMetal Plus Stainless Steel Deactivation for Tubing, Connectors, and Fittings

APPLICATION NOTE. A Capillary Approach to ASTM D3606: Test Method for Determination of Benzene and Toluene in Finished Motor and Aviation Gasoline

Benzene Contamination in BabyFood and Beverages by New Generation of Static Headspace Autosampler coupled to Fast GC-TOFMS

Transcription:

Micro Liquid-Liquid Extraction with the Agilent 7683 Automatic Liquid Sampler Application Gas Chromatography March 1998 Authors Matthew S. Klee Agilent Technologies, Inc. 285 Centerville Road Wilmington, DE 1988-161 USA Abstract Micro liquid-liquid extraction (MLLE), which uses smaller samples and requires less sample handling than standard liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), lowers the cost of analysis by reducing both the amount of solvent necessary to prepare a sample and the amount of waste requiring disposal. Moreover, with the Agilent 689 Plus gas chromatograph (GC) system, MLLE results are as sensitive as results from standard LLE. Introduction Liquid-Liquid Extraction Liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) is one of the oldest and most widely used sample preparation processes. LLE relies on the partition of analytes between two immiscible liquids. For the most effective separation and concentration, analytes of interest should show a significant preference for one liquid over the other. The degree of separation of a given analyte between two liquids is a function of several factors, including: Polarity of the solute Relative polarity of the two solvents Ionic strength ph Temperature Presence and concentration of additional analytes Time Mixing/contact between the bulk liquids The concentration of an analyte in a given extraction solvent is related to its original concentration in the starting solvent, its affinity for the extraction solvent relative to the original solvent, and the relative volumes of the two solvents. This is expressed by: C a = K C b V b /V a where K is the partition coefficient (a constant that depends on the analyte and solvents), C a andc b are the concentrations of the analyte in solvents a and b, and V a and V b are the respective volumes of solvents a and b. Maximizing concentration of a given analyte (for increasing sensitivity of analysis at a constant injection volume) in solvent a requires a large K and a small volume of solvent a compared with solvent b. As a rule of thumb, to maximize concentration of an analyte in a given solvent (maximum K), the polarity of the solvent should be very similar to the polarity of the analyte of interest. For example, analytes found in petroleum samples are usually nonpolar and, therefore, favor hydrocarbon solvents. In contrast, analytes containing acidic or basic functional groups prefer water or alcohols as solvents. LLE is widely used in many arenas of analysis, among them environmental, forensic, food, process,and pharmaceutical. Common examples of LLE in sample preparation for environmental analysis include semivolatiles in water, pesticides in food, and PAHs in water. LLE is performed for severalreasons: To increase the concentration of analytes of interest so as to increase the sensitivity of the analysis

To isolate analytes of interest from other analytes, contaminants, or interferences in the sample To transfer analytes from a problematic solvent (for example, water) to a preferred one (called "solvent exchange") There are several benefits of LLE: There are a wide variety of solvents from which to choose, giving analysts great flexibility in optimizing selectivity. Fresh solvent is added to each sample, avoiding any chance of carryover or cross contamination. The concepts and approaches to LLE are well understood and predictable. Table 1. Miscibilities and Relative Polarities (p') of Several Common LLE Solvents. 1,2 The larger the value of p', the higher the polarity and the affinity for polar solutes. X implies that the pair of solvents is immiscible and, therefore, potentially useful for LLE. O implies partial miscibility. Table 1 lists several common solvents, their relative polarities, and their mutual miscibilities. In choosing the appropriate solvent for a given analysis, analysts can use information such as this to help select an extraction solvent with the best polarity and solvent strength to yield the desired result. The range of choice in selectivities and solvent strengths is much larger for liquids than for alternative extraction/concentration techniques using bonded stationary phases such as with solid-phase extraction (SPE) or solid-phase micro extraction (SPME). In the table, an "x" indicates that the solvent pair is immiscible and, therefore, a potential match for LLE. An "o" indicates that the solvent pair is partially miscible but that it might still be useful for LLE. Micro Liquid-Liquid Extraction Micro liquid-liquid extraction (MLLE) is a simple implementation of LLE that can be accomplished with the * Saturated alkanes such as pentane, cyclohexane, hexane, trimethylpentane, isooctane, etc. n/a = not available 7683 automatic liquid sampler (ALS). Because the depth of the syringe needle into the ALS vial can be adjusted, the sample can be removed from either the top or the bottom layer of two immiscible liquids, offering flexibility and reduced sample preparation. The first step is to select an appropriate solvent for extraction. Then, approximately.5-ml of solvent 1 is added to 1-mL of sample in the standard 2-mL ALS sample vial. The vial is capped, shaken, and then the two layers are allowed to separate after the vial is placed in the ALS tray or turret. Discussion Large-Volume Injection in Combination with MLLE Interest in increasing analytical measurement sensitivity has driven the development of several largevolume injection techniques. (3-5) Larger injections lead to proportionally lower detection limits. The 7683 ALS can be used to inject large volumes (typically 25 to 1 ml). To remove the large amount of solvent before it reaches the column, where it could distort peak shape and obscure analyte peaks, the 689 Plus gas chromatograph (GC) system 2

offers two inlet choices: a programmable temperature vaporizer (PTV) inlet in solvent vent mode for complex matrices or a cool on-column (COC) inlet with solvent vapor exit for cleaner matrices such as drinking water. References 3, 4, and 5 provide further explanation of large-volume injections with the 689 Plus GC. 1. ml Water sample +.5 ml Pentane ((( Vortex ))) Sample withdrawn and Injected Applications of Micro Liquid-Liquid Extraction Figure 1. Typical quick MLLE procedure to extract analytes from water. Halocarbons in Drinking Water Halocarbons are produced as by products in the disinfection of drinking water. The concentration of halocarbons in drinking wateris regulated in most parts of the world. Halocarbons in drinking water can be determined quickly by using MLLE with pentane for the extraction (figure 1) and a gas chromatograph with an electron capture detector (GC/ECD) for the analysis. 2 Figure 2 shows a chromatogram from the MLLE of common halocarbons at concentrationsnear the World Health Organization regulatory limit (1 ppb total). Figure 3 illustrates the linearity of response achieve with the 689 Micro-ECD. Hz 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Figure 2. CHCl 3 CHBrCl 2 CHBr2 Cl CHBr 3 Pentane MLLE of 5 ppb trihalomethanes in water. Sample preparation: 1 ml of water +.5 ml of pentane, vortex vial, auto inject 1 ml of supernatant (splitless). GC conditions: 3 m 53 mm 2.65 mm Agilent HP-1, 35 C (1) 125 C @ 1 C/min. Detector: 689 Micro-ECD. min Area 18, Area = 163.72 * Amt + 71.211 16, Correlation:.9993 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 5 Amount [ppb] 1 Figure 3. Dichlorobromomethane calibration curve for pentane/water extraction of trihalocarbons showing excellent linearity with the 689 Micro-ECD. 3

Figure 4 presents the results of MLLE in an analysis of drinking water, showing chloroform concentration that grossly exceeds the regulatory limit. Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Hz 8 6 46 ppb Chloroform 11 ppb CHBrCl 2 Many states in the U.S. require the monitoring of gas stations for leaks in their underground storage tanks. A quick extraction of some soil (in water) from various points around the storage tanks, or from water sources near the site, can indicate if a leak is present and from where it is coming. Figure 5 shows the result of a cyclohexane MLLE of diesel fuel from water. Profiles from the chrmatogram are used to identify the type and specific source of the fuel. Total flame ionization detector (FID) area response under the profile is used to determine the concentration of diesel fuel in the water sample. PAHs in Water 4 4 ppb CHBrCl 2 1 ppb CHBr 3 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Figure 4. Trihalocarbons determined in actual drinking water by the MLLE method. pa 3 min Many common polynuclear hydrocarbons (PAHs) are carcinogens. As such, their concentrations in drinking and wastewater are regulated. Nitromethane is a unique solvent that can extract aromatic compounds selectively. 6 Nitromethane is denser than cyclohexane; so in this case, an aliquot of the bottom layer in the vial is injected for analysis. Figure 6 shows the resulting chromatogram for nitromethane extract of PAHs from cyclohexane. 25 2 15 1 5 C 14 C 16 C 18 C 2 Figure 5. MLLE extraction of 1 percent diesel oil in water, extracted into cyclohexane. Column: 3 m 32 mm.25 mm Agilent HP-5. Inlet: 25 C, 1 ml splitless injection. Detector: FID, 25 C. Resulting area RSD: 2 to 3 percent. 6 4

Amphetamines Figure 7 shows how MLLE can be used to identify and quantify illicit drugs such as amphetamines. The procedure involves dissolution of the material in water, ph adjustment, and MLLE. The procedure is fast and effective. The simple extraction procedure is as follows: 1. Transfer and weigh 5 to 1 mg of sample into a 2-mL sample vial. (Use more sample if the content of amphetamines in the sample is less than.1 percent) 2. Pipette 1 ml of phosphate buffer (ph 1) into the vial and mix (by shaking) to dissolve the amphetamines. 3 Pipette.5 ml of methylenechloride into the vial and vortex twice (5 to 1 seconds each time), or shake, to extract the amphetamines from the buffer. 4. Place the vial in the tray of the 7683 ALS. Inject 1 ml of methylene chloride extract (bottom layer) into the GC for analysis. Figure 6. MLLE extraction of 1 ppm PAHs extracted selectively from cyclohexane into nitromethane. Column: 3 m 32 mm.25 mm Agilent HP- 5. Inlet: 25 C, 1 ml splitless injection. Detector: FID, 25 C. RSD: 1 to 2 percent. 7 Conclusion Micro liquid-liquid extraction is a fast and effective means to analyze a wide range of samples. This technique also reduces the cost of analysis by requiring less solvent than standard liquid-liquid extraction. Moreover, MLLE can be accomplished with the standard Agilent 689 Plus GC with an Agilent 7683 ALS. Figure 7. FID analysis of amphetamine and methamphetamine. MLLE extraction of 1 mg/ml of each component in water. Resulting area repeatability was 1 percent RSD. Column: 3 m.25 mm id.25 mm Agilent HP-5MS. Oven: 12 C (2 min) to 15 C @ 15 C/min, to 3 C (2 min) at 25 C/min. Inlet: 25 C. 1 ml injection split 5:1. Detector: FID, 3 C. 5

References 1. Snyder, L. R., and Kirkland, J. J., Introduction to Modern Liquid- Chromatography, 2 nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1979. 2. High Purity Solvent Guide, James T. Przybytek, ed., Burdick & Jackson Laboratories, 1982. 3. David, F., Sandra, P., and Klee, M. S., "Analysis of Trihalomethanes by Micro Liquid-Liquid Extraction and Capillary Gas Chromatography with the 689 Micro ECD, " Agilent Technologies, Application Note 228-379, Publication No. (23) 5965-814E, April 1997. 4. Wilson, B., Wylie, P. L., and Klee, M. S., "Large-Volume Injection for Gas Chromatography Using a PTV Inlet," Agilent Technologies, Application Note 228-374, Publication No. (23) 5965-777E, March 1977. 5. Wilson, B., Nixon, D., and Klee,M. S., "Large-Volume Injection for Gas Chromatography Using COC-SVE," Agilent Technologies, Application Note 228-377, Publication No. (23) 5965-7923E, April 1997. 6. David, F., Sandra, P., and Klee, M. S., "Large-Volume Cool On-Column Injection Using the G2399A Solvent Vapor Exit Kit," Agilent Technologies, Application Note 228-378, Publication No. (23) 5965-7925E, April 1977. 7. David, F., Sandra, P., and Stafford, S., "Use of Variable Sampling Depth for Micro Liquid-Liquid Extraction with the G1513A Injector: Sequential Analysis of Hydrocarbons and PAHs," Agilent Technologies, Application Note 228-361, Publication No.(23) 5965-1611E, May 1996. Agilent shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for incidental or consequential damages in connection with the furnishing, performance, or use of this material. Information, descriptions, and specifications in this publication are subject to change without notice. Copyright 2 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Printed in the USA 4/2 5966-4225E