Isothermal parameters

Similar documents
Chapter 14. Basics of The Differential Geometry of Surfaces. Introduction. Parameterized Surfaces. The First... Home Page. Title Page.

ν(u, v) = N(u, v) G(r(u, v)) E r(u,v) 3.

Chapter 16. Manifolds and Geodesics Manifold Theory. Reading: Osserman [7] Pg , 55, 63-65, Do Carmo [2] Pg ,

Part IB Geometry. Theorems. Based on lectures by A. G. Kovalev Notes taken by Dexter Chua. Lent 2016

Surfaces of Revolution with Constant Mean Curvature H = c in Hyperbolic 3-Space H 3 ( c 2 )

Minimal Surfaces. Clay Shonkwiler

On the Weierstrass-Enneper Representation of Minimal Surfaces

Exercise 1 (Formula for connection 1-forms) Using the first structure equation, show that

Chapter 5. The Second Fundamental Form

Lectures 18: Gauss's Remarkable Theorem II. Table of contents

LECTURE 5: COMPLEX AND KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

MATH DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. Contents

Totally quasi-umbilic timelike surfaces in R 1,2

Hyperbolic Geometry on Geometric Surfaces

Linear Ordinary Differential Equations

DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND COHOMOLOGY

Classical differential geometry of two-dimensional surfaces

Pullbacks, Isometries & Conformal Maps

A PROOF OF THE GAUSS-BONNET THEOREM. Contents. 1. Introduction. 2. Regular Surfaces

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 4. Show that a catenoid and helicoid are locally isometric.

d F = (df E 3 ) E 3. (4.1)

Bi-quartic parametric polynomial minimal surfaces

Notes on Cartan s Method of Moving Frames

LECTURE 10: THE PARALLEL TRANSPORT

MATH 4030 Differential Geometry Lecture Notes Part 4 last revised on December 4, Elementary tensor calculus

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

Surfaces with zero mean curvature vector in 4-dimensional space forms

Math 5378, Differential Geometry Solutions to practice questions for Test 2

Introduction to Minimal Surface Theory: Lecture 2

Molding surfaces and Liouville s equation

Timelike Surfaces in the Lorentz-Minkowski Space with Prescribed Gaussian Curvature and Gauss Map

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, LECTURE 16-17, JULY 14-17

Lecture Notes on Minimal Surfaces January 27, 2006 by Michael Dorff

Part IB GEOMETRY (Lent 2016): Example Sheet 1

14 Higher order forms; divergence theorem

Report submitted to Prof. P. Shipman for Math 641, Spring 2012

CHAPTER 3. Gauss map. In this chapter we will study the Gauss map of surfaces in R 3.

A local characterization for constant curvature metrics in 2-dimensional Lorentz manifolds

Complex manifolds, Kahler metrics, differential and harmonic forms

Lectures 15: Parallel Transport. Table of contents

Complex Analysis Homework 3

THEODORE VORONOV DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. Spring 2009

The Gauss map and second fundamental form of surfaces in R 3

Intrinsic Surface Geometry

Geometry of Curves and Surfaces

Chapter 4. The First Fundamental Form (Induced Metric)

1 The Differential Geometry of Surfaces

Heat Kernel and Analysis on Manifolds Excerpt with Exercises. Alexander Grigor yan

4 Riemannian geometry

Past Exam Problems in Integrals, Solutions

is holomorphic. In other words, a holomorphic function is a collection of compatible holomorphic functions on all charts.

THE GAUSS MAP OF TIMELIKE SURFACES IN R n Introduction

Surfaces of Revolution with Constant Mean Curvature in Hyperbolic 3-Space

Non-Degenerate Quadric Surfaces in Euclidean 3-Space

7 Curvature of a connection

Timelike Rotational Surfaces of Elliptic, Hyperbolic and Parabolic Types in Minkowski Space E 4 with Pointwise 1-Type Gauss Map

Arc Length. Philippe B. Laval. Today KSU. Philippe B. Laval (KSU) Arc Length Today 1 / 12

ON HAMILTONIAN STATIONARY LAGRANGIAN SPHERES IN NON-EINSTEIN KÄHLER SURFACES

L19: Fredholm theory. where E u = u T X and J u = Formally, J-holomorphic curves are just 1

Part IB. Geometry. Year

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. LECTURE 12-13,

UNICITY RESULTS FOR GAUSS MAPS OF MNINIMAL. SURFACES IMMERSED IN R m

The Hodge Star Operator

Geometric Modelling Summer 2016

1 Structures 2. 2 Framework of Riemann surfaces Basic configuration Holomorphic functions... 3

Lecture 13 The Fundamental Forms of a Surface

1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties

Coordinate Finite Type Rotational Surfaces in Euclidean Spaces

Homework for Math , Spring 2008

SOME EXERCISES IN CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES

Inner Product Spaces 6.1 Length and Dot Product in R n

A crash course the geometry of hyperbolic surfaces

Lectures in Discrete Differential Geometry 2 Surfaces

CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARIES

Tools from Lebesgue integration

Practice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009.

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 28 Jun 2008

HILBERT S THEOREM ON THE HYPERBOLIC PLANE

LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY

9 Radon-Nikodym theorem and conditioning

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

MASTER S THESIS. Minimal Surfaces A proof of Bernstein's theorem JENNY LARSSON

William P. Thurston. The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds

Estimates in surfaces with positive constant Gauss curvature

Quasi-conformal maps and Beltrami equation

Properties of the Pseudosphere

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.ag] 18 Oct 2003

The Jacobian. v y u y v (see exercise 46). The total derivative is also known as the Jacobian Matrix of the transformation T (u; v) :

An extremal eigenvalue problem for surfaces with boundary

Centre for Mathematics and Its Applications The Australian National University Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia. 1. Introduction

Final Exam Topic Outline

Characterisation of Accumulation Points. Convergence in Metric Spaces. Characterisation of Closed Sets. Characterisation of Closed Sets

Legendre surfaces whose mean curvature vectors are eigenvectors of the Laplace operator

The existence of light-like homogeneous geodesics in homogeneous Lorentzian manifolds. Sao Paulo, 2013

Lecture 1. Introduction

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 20 Mar 2017

Differential Geometry Exercises

RIEMANN SURFACES. LECTURE NOTES. WINTER SEMESTER 2015/2016.

CS Tutorial 5 - Differential Geometry I - Surfaces

Symplectic critical surfaces in Kähler surfaces

Transcription:

MTH.B402; Sect. 3 (20180626) 26 Isothermal parameters A Review of Complex Analysis. Let C be the complex plane. A C 1 -function 7 f : C D z w = f(z) C defined on a domain D is said to be holomorphic if the derivative exists for all z D. f (z) := lim h 0 f(z + h) f(z) h Fact 3.1 (The Cauchy-Riemann equation). A function f : C D C is holomorphic if and only if (3.1) ξ = v η and η = v ξ holds on D, where w = f(z), z = ξ + iη, w = u + iv (i = 1). For functions of complex variable z = ξ + iη, we set (3.2) z := 1 ( 2 ξ i ), η z := 1 ( 2 ξ + i ). η Corollary 3.2. For a complex function f, (3.1) is equivalent to (3.3) f z = 0. Proof. Setting w = f(z) = u + iv and z = ξ + iη. Then the real (resp. imaginary) part of the left-hand side of (3.3) coincides with the first (resp. second) equation of (3.1). 26. June, 2018. 7 Of class C 1 as a map from D R 2 to R 2. Isothermal Coordinates. Definition 3.3. Let f : M 2 R 3 be an immersion of 2-manifold, and ( ds 2 its ) first fundamental form. A local coordinate chart U; (u, v) of M 2 is called an isothermal coordinate system or a conformal coordinate system if ds 2 is written in the form 8 ds 2 = e 2σ (du 2 + dv 2 ), σ = σ(u, v) C (U). Example 3.4. Let γ(u) = (x(u), z(u)) = (a cosh u a, u), that is, γ is the graph x = a cosh z a on the xz-plane, called the catenary. We call the surface of revolution generated by γ(u) the catenoid, which is parametrized as p(u, v) = ( x(u) cos v, x(u) sin v, z(u) ), This parametrization of the catenoid is isothermal when a = 1. In fact, the first fundamental form is expressed as cosh 2 (u/a)(du 2 + a 2 dv 2 ). Definition 3.5. Two charts ( U j ; (u j, v j ) ) (j = 1, 2) of a 2- manifold M 2 has the same (resp. opposite) orientation if the Jacobian (u 2,v 2 ) (u 1,v 1 ) is positive (resp. negative) on U 1 U 2. A manifold M 2 is said to be oriented if there exists an atlas {( U j ; (u j, v j ) )} such that all charts have the same orientations. A choice of such an atlas is called an orientation of M 2. 8 The notion of the isothermal coordinate system can be defined not only for surfaces but also for Riemannian 2-manifolds, that is, differentiable 2- manifolds M 2 with Riemannian metrics ds 2 (the first fundamental forms).

27 (20180626) MTH.B402; Sect. 3 MTH.B402; Sect. 3 (20180626) 28 Proposition 3.6. Let (u, v) be an isothermal coordinate system of a surface. Then another coordinate system (ξ, η) is also isothermal if and only if the parameter change (ξ, η) (u, v) satisfy (3.4) ξ = ε v η, η = ε v ξ, where ε = 1 (resp. 1) if (u, v) and (ξ, η) has the same (resp. the opposite) orientation. Proof. If we write ds 2 = e 2σ (du 2 + dv 2 ), it holds that ds 2 = e 2σ( (u 2 ξ + v 2 ξ) dξ 2 + 2(u ξ v η + u η v ξ ) dξ dη + (u 2 η + v 2 η) dη 2). Thus, (ξ, η) is isothermal if and only if (3.5) u 2 ξ + v 2 ξ = u 2 η + v 2 η, u ξ v η + u η v ξ = 0. The second equality yields (v ξ, v η ) = ε( u η, u ξ ) for some function ε. Substituting this into the first equation of (3.5), we get ε = ±1. Moreover, (u, v) (ξ, η) = det ( ) uξ u η v ξ v η Thus, the conclusion follows. ( ) uξ u = det η = ε(u 2 εu η εu ξ + u 2 ξ η). Corollary 3.7. Let (u, v) is an isothermal coordinate system. Then a coordinate system (ξ, η) is isothermal and has the same orientation as (u, v) if and only if the map ξ + iη u + iv (i = 1) is holomorphic. Proof. Equations 3.4 for ε = +1 are nothing but the Cauchy- Riemann equations (3.1). The notion of isothermal coordinate systems are meaningful not only for immersed surfaces but also for Riemannian manifolds. There exist such coordinate systems on a 2-dimensional Riemannian manifold: Fact 3.8 (Section 15 in 3-1). Let (M 2, ds 2 ) be an arbitrary Riemannian manifold. Then for each p M 2, there exists an isothermal chart containing p. Corollary 3.9. Any oriented Riemannian 2-manifold has a structure of Riemann surface (i.e., a complex 1-manifold) such that for each complex coordinate z = u + iv, (u, v) is an isothermal coordinate system for the Riemannian metric. Proof. Let p M 2 and take a local coordinate chart ( U p ; (x, y) ) at p which is compatible to the orientation of M 2. Then there exists an isothermal coordinate chart ( V p ; (u p, v p ) ) at p, because of Fact 3.8. Moreover, replacing (u, v) by (v, u) if necessary, we can take (u, v) which has the same orientation of (x, y). Thus, we have an atlas {( V p ; (u p, v p ) )} consists of isothermal coordinate systems. Since each chart is compatible of the orientation, the coordinate change z p = u p + iv p u q + iv q = z q is holomorphic. Hence we get a complex atlas {( V p ; z p )}. The Gauss and Weingarten formulas. Let p: U R 3 be a parametrized regular surface defined on a domain U of the uvplane. Assume that (u, v) is an isothermal coordinate system,

29 (20180626) MTH.B402; Sect. 3 MTH.B402; Sect. 3 (20180626) 30 and write the first fundamental form ds 2 as (3.6) ds 2 := e 2σ (du 2 + dv 2 ) σ C (U), that is, (3.7) p u p u = p v p v = e 2σ, p u p v = 0, where denotes the canonical inner product of R 3. Since p u p v = (p u p u )(p v p v ) (p u p v ) 2 = e 2σ, the unit normal vector field ν can be chosen as (3.8) ν = e 2σ (p u p v ), where denotes the vector product of R 3. Write the second fundamental form of p as (3.9) II = L du 2 + 2M du dv + N dv 2, where L = p uu ν, M = p uv ν, N = p vv ν. Proposition 3.10 (The Gauss formula). Under the situation above, it holds that p uu = p uv = σ u p u σ v p v + Lν, σ v p u + σ u p v + Mν, p vv = σ v p u + σ u p v + Nν. Proof. Since {p u, p v, ν} is a bases of R 3 for each (u, v) U, one can write (3.10) p uu = ap u + bp v + cν, where a, b, c are smooth functions on U. Here, since ν is a unit vector perpendicular to both p u and p v, we have c = p uu ν = L. On the other hand, by (3.7), we have e 2σ a = p uu p u = 1 2 (p u p u ) u = 1 2 (e2σ ) u = σ u e 2σ, e 2σ b = p uu p v = (p u p v ) u p u p uv = 1 2 (p u p u ) v = σ v e 2σ. Thus the first equality of the conclusion is obtained. The second and third equality can be obtained in the same manner. Proposition 3.11 (The Weingarten formula). Under the situation above, it holds that ν u = e 2σ (Lp u + Mp v ), ν v = e 2σ (Mp u + Np v ). Proof. If we write ν u = ap u + bp v + cν, we have e 2σ a = ν u p u = (ν p u ) u ν p uu = L, e 2σ b = ν u p v = (ν p v ) u ν p uv = M, c = ν u ν = 1 2 (ν ν) u, and the first equality of the conclusion is obtained. The second equality can be proven in the same manner.

31 (20180626) MTH.B402; Sect. 3 MTH.B402; Sect. 3 (20180626) 32 Gauss Frame. As seen in the proofs of Proposition 3.10 and 3.11, {p u, p v, ν} is a basis of R 3 for each (u, v) U. Regarding p u, p v and ν as column vectors, we then have a matrix-valued function (3.11) F := (p u, p v, ν): U GL(3, R) M 3 (R). We call such an F the Gauss frame of the surface. The following theorem is an immediate consequence of Propositions 3.10 and 3.11: Theorem 3.12. Let p: U R 3 be a regular surface defined on a domain U in the uv-plane, and denote by ν the unit normal vector field of it. Assume that (u, v) is an isothermal coordinate system, and the first and second fundamental forms are written as (3.12) ds 2 = e 2σ (du 2 + dv 2 ), II = L du 2 + 2M du dv + N dv 2. Then the Gauss frame F := (p u, p v, ν) satisfies the following system of linear partial differential equations: (3.13) F = FΩ, F v = FΛ, σ u σ v e 2σ L Ω := σ v σ u e 2σ M, L M 0 σ v σ u e 2σ M Λ := σ u σ v e 2σ N, M N 0 Gauss-Codazzi equations. The coefficients Ω and Λ in (3.13) must satisfy the integrability condition (2.2) in Lemma 2.2. Lemma 3.13. The matrices Ω and Λ in (3.13) satisfy if and only if Ω v Λ u ΩΛ + ΛΩ = O (3.14) σ uu + σ vv + e 2σ (LN M 2 ) = 0 and (3.15) L v M u = σ v (L+N) and N u M v = σ u (L+N). Proof. A direct computation. Thus we have Theorem 3.14 (The Gauss and Codazzi equatoins). Let p: U R 3 be a regular surface defined on a domain U in the uv-plane, and denote by ν the unit normal vector field of it. Assume that (u, v) is an isothermal coordinate system, and the first and second fundamental forms are written as (3.12). Then (3.14) and (3.15) hold. Remark 3.15. The equations (3.14) and (3.15) are called the Gauss equation and the Codazzi equations, respectively. The Gauss equation is often referred as Gauss Theorema Egregium.

33 (20180626) MTH.B402; Sect. 3 MTH.B402; Sect. 3 (20180626) 34 Fundamental Theorem for Surfaces. The following is the special case of the fundamental theorem for surfaces (Theorem 2.13): Theorem 3.16. Let U R 2 be a simply connected domain, σ, L, M, N C -functions satisfying (3.14) and (3.15). Then there exists a parametrization p: U R 3 of regular surface whose fundamental forms are given by (3.12). Moreover, such a surface is unique up to orientation preserving isometries of R 3. Proof. By Lemma 3.13, Theorem 2.3 yields that there exists a matrix-valued function F : U M 3 (R) satisfying (3.13) with the initial condition e σ(u0,v0) 0 0 (3.16) F(u 0, v 0 ) = 0 e σ(u 0,v 0 ) 0, 0 0 1 for a fixed point (u 0, v 0 ) U. Let a, b, c be vector-valued functions such that F = (a, b, c). Since a v = σ v a + σ u b + Mc = b u, the vector-valued 1-form ω := a du + b dv is closed. Then by Poincaré s lemma (Theorem 2.6), there exists a vector-valued function p: U R 3 such that dp = ω: Let p u = a, p v = b. ˆF := (e σ a, e σ b, c). Then it holds that ˆF u = ˆF ˆΩ, ˆFv = ˆF ˆΛ, ˆΩ := 0 σ v e σ L σ v 0 e σ M, e σ L e σ M 0 ˆΛ := 0 σ u e σ M σ u 0 e σ N e σ M e σ N 0 with ˆF(u 0, v 0 ) = id. Then by Theorem 2.3, ˆF SO(3) for all (u, v) U. This means that p u p u = a a = e 2σ, p u p v = a b = 0, p v p v = b b = e 2σ p u ν = p v ν = 0, ν ν = 1, where ν := c. Hence the first fundamental form of p is ds 2 = e 2σ (du 2 + dv 2 ) and ν is the unit normal vector field of p. Moreover, since p uu ν = a u c = L, p uv ν = M, p vv ν = N. Thus, p is the desired immersion. Next, we prove the uniqueness. Let p be an immersion with (3.12). Then the Gauss frame F satisfies the equation (3.13) as well as F. Here, p u (u 0, v 0 ) = e σ(u 0,v 0 ), p v (u 0, v 0 ) = e σ(u 0,v 0 ), and p u, p v, ν are mutually perpendicular. Thus, by a suitable rotation in R 3, we may assume F(u 0, v 0 ) coincides with F(u 0, v 0 ) without loss of generality. Then F = F by the uniqueness part

35 (20180626) MTH.B402; Sect. 3 MTH.B402; Sect. 3 (20180626) 36 of Theorem 2.3, and dp = d p holds. Hence p = p up to additive constant vector. Exercises 3-1 H Prove Theorem 3.14. 3-2 H Let (x(u), z(u)) be a curve on the xz-plane parametrized by the arc-length parameter (that is, (ẋ) 2 + (ẏ) 2 = 1). Find an isothermal parameter of the surface of revolution p(u, v) = ( x(u) cos v, x(u) sin v, z(u) ).