ON THE M 3 M 1 QUESTION

Similar documents
Intermediate Division Solutions

Multi-objective Programming Approach for. Fuzzy Linear Programming Problems

Function representation of a noncommutative uniform algebra

Chapter 3.1: Polynomial Functions

UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY. Department of Mathematics PROBABILITY THEORY, STATISTICS AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH GROUP. Memorandum COSOR 76-10

K [f(t)] 2 [ (st) /2 K A GENERALIZED MEIJER TRANSFORMATION. Ku(z) ()x) t -)-I e. K(z) r( + ) () (t 2 I) -1/2 e -zt dt, G. L. N. RAO L.

IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 2 Issue 12, December

MATH Midterm Examination Victor Matveev October 26, 2016

MORE ON CAUCHY CONDITIONS

A new Type of Fuzzy Functions in Fuzzy Topological Spaces

Markov processes and the Kolmogorov equations

A New Method for Finding an Optimal Solution. of Fully Interval Integer Transportation Problems

D.S.G. POLLOCK: TOPICS IN TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS STATISTICAL FOURIER ANALYSIS

ENGI 4421 Central Limit Theorem Page Central Limit Theorem [Navidi, section 4.11; Devore sections ]

ON FREE RING EXTENSIONS OF DEGREE N

PRODUCTS OF SPACES OF COUNTABLE TIGHTNESS

5.1 Two-Step Conditional Density Estimator

STRONG QUASI-COMPLETE SPACES

Fourier Method for Solving Transportation. Problems with Mixed Constraints

Metric Space Properties

A NOTE ON LEBESGUE SPACES

Lecture Notes for Analysis Class

ENGI 4421 Central Limit Theorem Page Central Limit Theorem [Navidi, section 4.11; Devore sections ]

Copyright 1978, by the author(s). All rights reserved.

Solutions. Definitions pertaining to solutions

University Microfilms, A XEROX Company. Ann Arbor, Michigan

are specified , are linearly independent Otherwise, they are linearly dependent, and one is expressed by a linear combination of the others

SOME REMARKS ON FREELY DECOMPOSABLE MAPPINGS

Axioms of Measure Theory

RMO Sample Paper 1 Solutions :

f n (x) f m (x) < ɛ/3 for all x A. By continuity of f n and f m we can find δ > 0 such that d(x, x 0 ) < δ implies that

FINITE BOOLEAN ALGEBRA. 1. Deconstructing Boolean algebras with atoms. Let B = <B,,,,,0,1> be a Boolean algebra and c B.

AN ARC-LIKE CONTINUUM THAT ADMITS A HOMEOMORPHISM WITH ENTROPY FOR ANY GIVEN VALUE

Common Coupled Fixed Point of Mappings Satisfying Rational Inequalities in Ordered Complex Valued Generalized Metric Spaces

The value of Banach limits on a certain sequence of all rational numbers in the interval (0,1) Bao Qi Feng

The generalized marginal rate of substitution

A NOTE ON INVARIANT SETS OF ITERATED FUNCTION SYSTEMS

An S-type upper bound for the largest singular value of nonnegative rectangular tensors

University of Colorado Denver Dept. Math. & Stat. Sciences Applied Analysis Preliminary Exam 13 January 2012, 10:00 am 2:00 pm. Good luck!

MATHEMATICS 9740/01 Paper 1 14 Sep hours

Control Systems. Controllability and Observability (Chapter 6)

Homology groups of disks with holes

x 2 x 3 x b 0, then a, b, c log x 1 log z log x log y 1 logb log a dy 4. dx As tangent is perpendicular to the x axis, slope

Math 61CM - Solutions to homework 3

TREE-LIKE CONTINUA AS LIMITS OF CYCLIC GRAPHS

Solution. 1 Solutions of Homework 1. Sangchul Lee. October 27, Problem 1.1

Full algebra of generalized functions and non-standard asymptotic analysis

It is always the case that unions, intersections, complements, and set differences are preserved by the inverse image of a function.

A REMARK ON A PROBLEM OF KLEE

EXAMPLES OF HEREDITARILY STRONGLY INFINITE-DIMENSIONAL COMPACTA

Theorem 3. A subset S of a topological space X is compact if and only if every open cover of S by open sets in X has a finite subcover.

MAT1026 Calculus II Basic Convergence Tests for Series

Quantum Mechanics for Scientists and Engineers. David Miller

THE DEVELOPMENT OF AND GAPS IN THE THEORY OF PRODUCTS OF INITIALLY M-COMPACT SPACES

A Proof of Birkhoff s Ergodic Theorem

BIRKHOFF ERGODIC THEOREM

E o and the equilibrium constant, K

Commutativity in Permutation Groups

On Strictly Point T -asymmetric Continua

Best bounds for dispersion of ratio block sequences for certain subsets of integers

I I L an,klr ~ Mr, n~l

Math 341 Lecture #31 6.5: Power Series

Infinite Sequences and Series

Cardinality Homework Solutions

Information Theory and Statistics Lecture 4: Lempel-Ziv code

BIO752: Advanced Methods in Biostatistics, II TERM 2, 2010 T. A. Louis. BIO 752: MIDTERM EXAMINATION: ANSWERS 30 November 2010

THE FINITENESS OF THE MAPPING CLASS GROUP FOR ATOROIDAL 3-MANIFOLDS WITH GENUINE LAMINATIONS

A LIMITED ARITHMETIC ON SIMPLE CONTINUED FRACTIONS - II 1. INTRODUCTION

Lecture 2. The Lovász Local Lemma

[1 & α(t & T 1. ' ρ 1

If a subset E of R contains no open interval, is it of zero measure? For instance, is the set of irrationals in [0, 1] is of measure zero?

Study of Energy Eigenvalues of Three Dimensional. Quantum Wires with Variable Cross Section

Physical Chemistry Laboratory I CHEM 445 Experiment 2 Partial Molar Volume (Revised, 01/13/03)

Solutions to Midterm II. of the following equation consistent with the boundary condition stated u. y u x y

The Boolean Ring of Intervals

Author. Introduction. Author. o Asmir Tobudic. ISE 599 Computational Modeling of Expressive Performance

Active redundancy allocation in systems. R. Romera; J. Valdés; R. Zequeira*

BETWEEN QUASICONVEX AND CONVEX SET-VALUED MAPPINGS. 1. Introduction. Throughout the paper we denote by X a linear space and by Y a topological linear

Riesz-Fischer Sequences and Lower Frame Bounds

On groups of diffeomorphisms of the interval with finitely many fixed points II. Azer Akhmedov

Mean residual life of coherent systems consisting of multiple types of dependent components

DIVISIBILITY PROPERTIES OF GENERALIZED FIBONACCI POLYNOMIALS

A NOTE ON AN R- MODULE WITH APPROXIMATELY-PURE INTERSECTION PROPERTY

International Journal of Mathematical Archive-7(6), 2016, Available online through ISSN

6 Integers Modulo n. integer k can be written as k = qn + r, with q,r, 0 r b. So any integer.

THE ASYMPTOTIC PERFORMANCE OF THE LOG LIKELIHOOD RATIO STATISTIC FOR THE MIXTURE MODEL AND RELATED RESULTS

Math 778S Spectral Graph Theory Handout #3: Eigenvalues of Adjacency Matrix

McGill University Math 354: Honors Analysis 3 Fall 2012 Solutions to selected problems

The Borel hierarchy classifies subsets of the reals by their topological complexity. Another approach is to classify them by size.

Ch. 1 Introduction to Estimation 1/15

Product measures, Tonelli s and Fubini s theorems For use in MAT3400/4400, autumn 2014 Nadia S. Larsen. Version of 13 October 2014.

(A sequence also can be thought of as the list of function values attained for a function f :ℵ X, where f (n) = x n for n 1.) x 1 x N +k x N +4 x 3

ANOTHER GENERALIZED FIBONACCI SEQUENCE 1. INTRODUCTION

Sequences and Series of Functions

A Combinatorial Proof of a Theorem of Katsuura

REMARKS ON CLOSURE-PRESERVING SUM THEOREMS

SOME FIBONACCI AND LUCAS IDENTITIES. L. CARLITZ Dyke University, Durham, North Carolina and H. H. FERNS Victoria, B. C, Canada

ON THE FUZZY METRIC SPACES

A Characterization of Compact Operators by Orthogonality

f t(y)dy f h(x)g(xy) dx fk 4 a. «..

Transcription:

Vlume 5, 1980 Pages 77 104 http://tplgy.aubur.edu/tp/ ON THE M 3 M 1 QUESTION by Gary Gruehage Tplgy Prceedigs Web: http://tplgy.aubur.edu/tp/ Mail: Tplgy Prceedigs Departmet f Mathematics & Statistics Aubur Uiversity, Alabama 36849, USA E-mail: tplg@aubur.edu ISSN: 0146-4124 COPYRIGHT c by Tplgy Prceedigs. All rights reserved.

TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume 5 1980 77 ON THE M3 ~ Ml QUESTION Gary Gruehage 1. Itrducti I 1961, J. Ceder [C] defied the Mi-spaces, i = 1,2,3, prved that M ~ M ~ M ad asked whether ay f the l 2 3, implicatis reversed. H. Juila [J] ad the authr [G ] l idepedetly prved that M 3 -spaces, usually called "stratifiable spaces," are M 2. The questi remais whether M ~ M that is, whether every stratifiable space has a 3 l, a-clsure-preservig base. Sme partial results btaied s far are that the clsed image f a metric space is M l (F. Slaughter [Sl]), ad that a-discrete stratifiable spaces are M [G ]. Recetly, R. Heath ad Juila shwed that l 2 every stratifiable space is the image f a Ml-space uder a perfect retracti (ad hece is a clsed subset f a Ml-space) Let us call a space which is a cutable ui f clsed metrizable subspaces a Fa-metrizable space. I the first part f this paper, we prve that every stratifiable Fa-metrizable space is MI. May cmm examples f stratifiable spaces seem t be f this type. Fr example, all the examples give i Ceder's paper, as well as the chuk-cmplexes (which he prves t be M I ), are Fa-metrizable. Hyma's M-spaces [H], called paracmplexes ad prved M I by J. Nagata [N], are als f this type. Ather iterestig class f stratifiable spaces is the fllwig. Let I be a idex set, ad fr each i E I,

78 Gruehage let Xi be a stratifiable space. Let p E D X., where "0" iei 1 detes the bx prduct. Let y {x E 0 X.: x{i) = p{i) iei 1 fr all but fiitely may i E I}. Brges [B ] prved that 3 if each Xi is stratifiable, s is Y. It is t hard t shw that if each Xi is Fa-metrizable, the s is Y; hece Y is M l i this case. I [G ], we asked whether a stratifiable space which 2 has a a-discrete etwrk csistig f cmpact-sets is M l. Sice cmpact stratifiable spaces are metrizable, ur result implies a affirmative aswer t this questi. Ufrtuately, the class f stratifiable Fa-metrizable spaces is t clsed uder clsed maps. I fact, the clsed image f a metric space eed t be Fa-metrizable [F]. It must be M thugh, by Slaughter's result mel, tied abve. Nw suppse a space X has the fllwig prperty: wheever Had K are clsed subsets f X with H c K, the H has a a-clsure-preservig uter base i K (i.e., there is a a-clsure-preservig cllecti lj f relatively pe subsets f K such that wheever H c 0, 0 pe, there exists U E lj with H cue 0). I the secd secti f this paper, we prve that if a Ml-space X has the abve prperty, the every clsed image f X is M ad l has the same prperty. Frm the fact that stratifiable Fa-metrizable spaces are M it is easily shw that they l, als have the abve prperty. Thus every clsed image f a stratifiable Fa-metrizable space is M This geeralizes l Slaughter's therem, ad aswers a questi f Nagata ccerig the paracmplexes metied abve.

TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume 5 1980 79 Nagata als shwed that if X is a paracmplex, the Id X < if ad ly if X has a a-cls~re-preservig base B such that Id(aB) < - 1 fr every B E B. He asked if this result is true fr ay Ml-space. Mizkami [M] shwed that it is true fr a Ml-space which is Fa-metrizable ad satisfies a certai further cditi. With ur techiques, we ca shw it is true fr ay stratifiable Fa-metrizable space. 2. Defiitis ad Other Prelimiaries All spaces are assumed t be regular. Let A O dete the iterir f a set A. A cllecti ~ f subsets f a space X is iterir-preservig if wheever ~' c ~, the (~') = {G : G E ~'}. A cllecti H f subsets f X is alsure-preservig if wheever H' c U{H: H E H'}. H, the uh' It is easy t see that the set f cmplemets f a iterir-preservig family is clsure-preservig, ad vice-versa. If H is a subset f a space X, a uter base fr H is a cllecti lj f pe subsets f X such that wheever H is ctaied i a pe set 0, the there exists U E lj such that H c U c:. A cllecti B is a quasi-base fr X if wheever x E U, U pe, there exists B E B such that x E B O c B c U. (B detes the iterir f B.) A space X is a Ml-spaae (M 2 -spaae) if X has a a-clsure-preservig base (quasibase). A M 3 -spaae, r stratifiable spaae, is the same as a M 2 -space.

80 Gruehage We will fte use the fllwig characterizati f M 2 -spaces due t Nagata [N ]. 2 Therem 2.1 (Nagata). A regular space X is a M 2 -space if ad ly if fr each x E X ad E W 3 there exists a pe eighbrhd g(x) f x such that (1) y E g (x) :::;> g (y) c g (x); ad (2) if H is clsed ad x ~ H 3 there exists Ew such that x f U 9 (x). xeh Clearly, we may assume g(x) ~ gl(x) A cllecti J is a etwrk fr X if wheever x E U, U pe, there exists F E J such that x E Feu. X is a a-space if X has a a-discrete etwrk. A space X is mtically rmal if fr every pair (H,K) f disjit clsed subsets, there exists a pe set D(H,K) such that (1) H c D(H,K) c D(H,K) c X - K; (2) H c H' ad K ~ K' => D(H,K) c D(H',K'). We shall be usig the fact that stratifiable spaces are paracmpact ad perfectly rmal [e], that they are a-spaces [H], ad that they are mtically rmal [HLZ]. Als, every subspace f a stratifiable space is stratifiable [C], ad every clsed image f a stratifiable space is stratifiable [B]. 3. Mai Results, Outlies fthe Prfs, ad Sme Questis Sice the prf f ur mai results are rather lg ad tedius, we will defer them t later sectis, givig ly brief utlies here.

TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume 5 1980 81 Therem 3.1. Let X be stratifiable ad Fa-metrizable. The X is MI. Als~ Id X ~ if ad ly if X h~r a a-clsure-preservig base B such that Id(aB) < -l fr each B E B. Outlie f prf. Suppse X is stratifiable. The there exist g(x) 's satisfyig the cditis f Therem 2.1. The stadard way t get a a-clsure-preservig quasi-base back frm the g(x) 's is as fllws. Fr each clsed set H, defie G(H) = U g(x). xeh frm prperty (1) f Therem 2.1 that Y = {G(H): H is clsed, Hex} is iterir-preservig. Hece, B = {X - G (H): H clsed, Hex} is clsure-preservig, ad frm prperty (2), clsed quasi-base. preservig base wuld be t defie It is easy t see U B is a Ew A aive attempt t get a a-clsure f B = {(X - G (H)): H clsed, HeX}. Hwever, B' may fail t be clsure-preservig. But it turs ut that if the G(H) 's are regular pe sets, the B' will be clsure-preservig. (See Lemma 5.1.) S we cstruct g(x) 's satisfyig the cditis f Therem 2.1 s that the crrespdig G(H) 's are regular pe. We d this by cstructig a certai sequece VO,V l, f lcally fiite pe cvers f X, ad the use the Vi's t cstruct the g(x) IS, s that: (i) each g(x) is a elemet f sme Vi; (ii) fr each m E w, every ui f elemets f U V.. 1 l<m is regular pe; ad

82 Gruehage (iii) if H is clsed ad y f u g (x), the there exists XEH a iteger k such that y f Cl (U{g(x): x E H, g (x) f u [I.}). i<k 1 It easily fllws that G (H) = U g (x) is regular pe xeh wheever H is clsed. The Fa-metrizable hypthesis is used t btai prperty (iii). It is pssible t cstruct [10,[11' ad the g(x)'s satisfyig (i) ad (ii) i ay stratifiable space. The "if" part f the last statemet f Therem 3.1 is a result f Nagata [N ]. T btai the "ly if" part, 2 we shw that if Id X <, we ca cstruct the V.'s s 1 that Id(aV) < -l fr each V E Vi. It the fllws that Id(aB) < -l fr each B E B' Therem 3.2. Suppse X is stratifiable ad has the fllwig prperty: wheever H ad~k are clsed subsets f X with H c K, the H has a a-clsure-preservig uter base i K. The every clsed image f X has the same prperty, ad is therefre M I Outlie f prf. Let (*) dete the prperty f Therem 3.2. Ay stratifiable space satisfyig (*) is MI. This fllws easily frm the facts that every clsed subset has a a-clsure-preservig uter base, ad that stratifiable spaces are a-spaces. Let f be a clsed map f X t Y, where X is stratifiable ad satisfies (*). Sice every clsed subset K f Y is the clsed image f a stratifiable space satisfyig (*), amely f-l(k), it is eugh t shw that every clsed

TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume 5 1980 83 image f a stratifiable space satisfyig (*) has the prperty that every clsed subset has a a-clsure-preservig uter base. S we are de if we shw that Y has this prperty. li -1 By a therem f Okuyama [0], Y = Y' U y, where f (y) is cmpact fr each y E Y', ad y" is a-discrete. We use this t shw that Y Y U Y where Y is a clsed l, irreducible image f a clsed subset X f X, ad Y is l pe ad a-discrete. Frm results i [BL], it fllws that every clsed subset f Y has a a-clsure-preservig uter base i Y. Thus Y ca be writte as the ui f a clsed subspace havig the prperty we wat, ad a pe a-discrete subspace. The fial step is t shw that ay stratifiable space which admits such a decmpsiti als has the prperty that every clsed subset has a a-clsure-preservig uter base. Remark. Fr stratifiable spaces, prperty (*) is equivalet t the fllwig prperty: wheever Had K are clsed subsets f X with H c K, the K/H is MI. Crllary 3.3. The clsed image f a stratifiable Fa-metrizable space is MI. Prf. Suppse X is stratifiable ad Fa-metrizable. Let H eke X, where Had K are clsed. stratifiable ad Fa-metrizable, hece MI. The K/H is By the abve remark, X satisfies the cditis f Therem 3.2. It is t kw whether every M1-space satisfies the prperty f Therem 3.2. I fact, it is t kw if

84 Gruehage every clsed subset f a Ml-space is MI. Hwever, the result f Heath ad Juila metied i the itrducti implies, as they te, that this questi is equivalet t the M ~ M questi. It is als t kw whether every 3 I clsed subset f a Ml-space has a a-clsure-preservig uter base. But if t, the by results f Ceder, there is a stratifiable space which is t MI. O the ther had, Brges ad Lutzer [BL] have shw that if each pit f a stratifiable space has a a-clsure-preservig base, the every stratifiable space is MI. Brges ad Lutzer have als shw that if every clsed subspace f a space X is M the every perfect image f I, X is MI. This suggests the fllwig questi, which wuld geeralize Therem 3.2 if aswered affirmatively. Questi 3.4. If every clsed subspace f a space X is M is every clsed image f X als M? I, I A class f spaces which Heath ad Juila called M-spaces may have a imprtat rle t play i settlig the M ~ M 1 questi. A M-space is a space which has 3 a a-clsure-preservig base f pe ad clsed sets. It is easy t see that every subspace f a M-space is M. Thus every perfect image f a M-space is MI. Recetly, Juila [J ] has btaied a alterate prf that strati 2 fiable Fa-metrizable spaces are M I are perfect images f M-spaces. by shwig that they Heath ad Juila ask whether every stratifiable space is the perfect image f a M-space. If s, the M => MI. Our ext crllary 3

TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume 5 1980 85 shws that it wuld be eugh (fr the purpse f btaiig M =>M ) t prve that every stratifiable space is the 3 l clsed image f a M-space. Crllary 3.5. The clsed image f a M-space is Prf. We shw that every M-space X satisfies the prperty f Therem 3.2. If K c X, the K is M. By mimicig Ceder's prf that every clsed subset f a M -space has a clsure-preservig uter quasi-base, we see 2 that every clsed subset f K has a clsure-preservig base i K. The class f stratifiable Fa-metrizable spaces is t clsed uder clsed maps r cutable prducts. These are still M f curse. I fact, sice prducts f perfect l, maps are perfect, the cutable prduct X f stratifiable Fa-metrizable spaces is the perfect image f a M-space. Hece X satisfies the prperty f Therem 3.2, ad s every clsed subspace ad clsed image f X is MI. But further iteratis f the prcedures f takig clsed subspaces, clsed images, ad cutable prducts, prduces spaces that I ca't prve are MI. What e might aim fr is a sluti t the fllwig: Prblem 3.6. Fid a class f Ml-spaces which ctais the Fa-metrizable spaces, ad which is clsed uder clsed subspaces, clsed images, ad cutable prducts. Nte that the class f stratifiable F -metrizable a spaces is clsed uder arbitrary subspaces, perfect images,

86 Gruehage ad fiite prducts. The class f stratifiable spaces satisfyig the prperty f Therem 3.2 is clsed uder clsed subspaces ad clsed images. Thus e wuld have a sluti t the Prblem 3.6 if e culd shw that this prperty is clsed uder cutable prducts. Fr ather apprach, te that the class f perfect images f M-spaces satisfies all the desired prperties except perhaps clsure uder clsed images. Althugh we d't d it here, the techiques f secti 6 ca be used t shw that if a stratifiable space X is the ui f a clsed Ml-space ad a Fa-metrizable space, the X is MI. This suggests a cuple f questis, fr which affirmative aswers t bth (r a egative aswer t e) wuld bviusly settle the M ~ M questi., 3 I Questi 3.7. If a stratifiable space X is a cutable ui f a clsed M subspaces, is X M? I I Questi 3.8. Is every stratifiable space the cutable ui f clsed M 1 subspaces? 4. Prelimiary Lemmas I this secti we preset a series f lemmas regular pe sets, leadig up t the result that i a paracmpact hereditarily rmal space, every pe cver has a lcally fiite refiemet V such that every ui f elemets f V is regular pe. I fact, if W is ay lcally fiite cllecti such that every ui f elemets f W is regular pe, the V ca be cstructed s that

TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume 5 1980 87 every ui f elemets f V U W is regular pe. Lemma 4.1. Let X be a hepeditapily pmal space. Suppse U~ V~ ad U U V ape pegulap pe~ ad H is a pelatively clsed subset f v. Suppse H is ctaied i a pe set. The thepe is a set W such that HeW c V~ wc O~ ad bth Wad U U W ape pegulap pe. If X is pepfectly pmal~ Id X < ~ ad Id(aU) < -l~ the we ca btai Id(aW) ~ -l. Ppf. Let 0' be a pe set such that H c 0' c a' c O. Usig the hereditary rmality X, we ca fid pe sets VI ad V such that 2 -v -v H c VI c VI c V 2 c V 2 c V 0', where XV detes the clsure f A i the subspace V. 0 let W = ~V-I--U-U~ v We claim that W has the desired 2. prperties. Nw Clearly, Hew c V, ad Wc O. Als, sice the itersecti f tw regular pe sets is regular pe, W is regular pe. It remais t shw W U U is regular pe. T see this, suppse p E W U U - W U U. Observe that w-u-u c VI U U. Thus p E V--I--U-U- - U. Hece p E VI' sice U is regular pe. Als, p E v-u-u - U (V U U) - U, s P E V. Hece p E VI V c V 2. S we have 0 p E =V-l~U-u~ V = W, ctradicti. 2 U au. T see the last statemet, te that aw c av U av l 2 Sice Id V <, we ca btai Id(aVV i ) ~ -l, i = 1,2, where "a " detes the budary f a set i the v subspace v. Nw av = [av av] U avv Thus Id(aV ) i i i. i ~ -l, ad s Id(aV U av U au) < -l. Thus Id(aW) < -l. l 2

88 Gruehage Lemma 4.2. If Uis a cllecti f subsets f a space X such that every fiite ui f elemets f Uis regular pe, the every fiite ui f fiite itersectis f elemets f U is regular pe. Prf. This fllws frm the fact that a fiite ui f fiite itersectis f elemets f Uca be writte as the fiite itersecti f fiite uis f elemets f U, ad that a fiite itersecti f regular pe sets is regular pe. Lemma 4.3. Suppse Uis a fiite cllecti f pe sets f a hereditarily rmal space X such that every ui f elemets f Uis regular pe. Let H C 0, H clsed, pe. The there exists a set W such that HeW c 0, ad every ui f elemets f U U {W} is regular pe. If X is perfectly rmal, Id X ~, ad Id(aU) < -l fr each U E U, the we ca btai Id(aW) < -l. Prf. If I U/ = 1, apply Lemma 1 with U the elemet f U, V = X, ad Had 0 as i the hypthesis f this lemma. The set W guarateed by Lemma 4.1 is easily see t satisfy the desired cditis. Nw suppse lui = > 1. Let U = {U,ul,---,U l}. - Let W be a regular pe set such that HeW ewe 0, 0 ad (uu) u W is regular pe. Suppse W has bee defied, k <. Fr each subset k I f k + 1 distict elemets f {O,l,---,-l}, let H(I) (aw ) ( U.). The the hyptheses f Lemma 4.1 k iei 1 are satisfied with U = U U., V U., H = H(I), ad 0 jfi J iei 1 as i this lemma. (Nte the use f Lemma 4.2 t get U U V

TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume 5 1980 89 regular pe.) Let W(I) be the set give by Lemma 4.1, ad let W = W U (U{W(I): le, III = k + I}). k + l k Let W = W. We claim that W has the desired prperty. T see this, assume mc U U {W}, ad x E um - Um. Clearly, we may assume W E mad x E W. Let I = {i < : x E Ui}' ad let m = I II If m = 0, 0 0 the x E (UO) U W - ( UU) U W = (uo) u W - (UU) U W 0 0' ctradicti. S we may assume m > 1. The x f Wm-l' fr therwise x E aw m _ l ( U.) = H (I) c W(I) c W. S iei 1 there is a pe set G such that x E G c (Um) ( U.) (X - W 1). iei 1 m- Sice W(I) U ( U U.) is regular pe ad des't cjfi J tai x, there exists y E G with Y f W(I) U ( u U.). jfi J Y E um, s Y E U(m - {W} ) r yew. Sice U(m - {W}) c U U., it must be true that yew. Thus there exists a jfi J empty set J c such that y E W(J). Sice y f W l, m But we have IJI > m. Sice y f W(I), we have J ~ I. Therefre, there exists j E J - I. But W(J) c --u. c u., iej 1 J ctradictig y f -u-u.. jfi J Thus W has the desired prperty. The last statemet f Lemma 4.3 fllws because W is the ui f a fiite umber f sets btaied frm the applicati f Lemma 4.1. Lemma 4.4. Let U be a pe cver f a paracmpact hereditarily rmal space X, ad let V be a lcally fiite cllecti such that every ui f elemets f V

90 Gruehage is regular pe. The there is a lcally fiite refiemet W f lj such that every ui f elemets f V U W is regular pe. If X is perfectly rmal, Id X ~, ad Id(aV) < -l fr each V E V, the we ca btai Id(aW) < -l fr each W E W. Prf. Let J U I be a lcally fiite pe cver Ew f X by sets whse clsures refie lj ad meet ly fiitely may elemets f V, ad such that each J is discrete. Let ~ = {G F : F E J} be a shrikig f J; i.e., ~ is a pe cver such that G F c F fr each F E J. Let V(F) = {V E V: V F ~ ~}. Fr each F E J ' let W be the set F give by Lemma 4.3 where lj = V(F), H = G ad F. F, The G c W c F, ad every ui f elemets f V U {W F F F : F E J } is regular pe. Let W Nw suppse that fr each F E J k, k <, we have defied a W such that F (i) W = {W : F E J is a discrete cllecti f k F k } pe sets; (ii) if F E J k, the G - U (uwj ) c W c F; F F j<k (iii) if F E J k, the W F G, F = ~ wheever F' E J. J with j < k; (iv) every ui f elemets f V U ( u W) is regular j j~k pe. TO defie W fr F E F I, let 0 = {OF: F E I } be a discrete cllectis f pe sets such that G F - u (uw k ) c OF c F, ad k< OF (U {G F : F E J k' k < }) ~

TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume 5 1980 91 This is pssible, sice U{G : F E J k < } c U (UW ). F k, k< k Nw, fr each F E I, let W be the set give by Lemma 4.3 F applied t the case where U= V(F) U {uw k : k < }, H = G F u (uw k ), ad 0 = OF. k< It ia easy t check that W = {W : F E J} satisfies F prperties (i)-(iii) abve. T see that (iv) is satisfied, suppse x E um - Um, where V U ( u W k ). Sice this k< cllecti is lcally fiite, we may assume mis fiite ad x E M - M fr every M E m. Let I = {k < : m W ~ ~}. k Fr each i E I, x ~ fr sme W E W. 1 uw. ]. sice W. 1 is discrete ad x E W- W By the iducti hypthesis, we ca assume there exists W E m W, where F E J. The F m V = m V(F), sice x E W c F. Thus x is i the F iterir f the clsure f but is t i this set, ctradictig the way W was defied F (i.e., the abve set must be regular pe). fies (iv). Thus W satis Let W= U W That Wis a refiemet f U fllws Ew frm prperty (ii). That Wis lcally fiite fllws frm (i) ad (iii). Ad that every ui f elemets f V U W is regular pe fllws frm (iv) ad the lcal fiiteess. Let us see hw t btai the last statemet f Lemma 4.4. First te that uder the hyptheses we ca get Id(aW) ~ -l fr W E W ' sice these sets were als btaied frm Lemma 4.3. If it's true fr W E U W the k, k< it's als true fr W E W, sice these sets were als

92 Gruehage btaied frm Lemma 4.3, with the U f Lemma 4.3 beig a subset f V tgether with {UW : k < }, ad Id(d(UW )) k k < -l fr k < sice each W is discrete. k 5. Stratifiable F-Metrizable Spaces I this secti, we prve that stratifiable Fa-metrizable spaces are MI. First, a easy lemma. Lemma 5.1. Let U be a iterir-preservig cllecti f regular pe subsets f a space X. The {(X - U): U E U} is clsure-preservig. Prf. Suppse U' c U, ad x E U{ (X - U): U E U/}. Suppse fr each U E U', we have x f (X - U)O. Sice each U is regular pe, we must have x E U fr each U E U'. Thus x E U', which is a pe set missig (X - U)O fr every U E U'. This ctradicti establishes the lemma. Prf f Therem 3.1. Let X be a stratifiable Fa-metrizable space. Let X U M, where each M is a Ew clsed, metrizable subspace f X. Let M, mew,m where 0 is pe.,m Let {U'} be a sequece f relatively pe cvers,m mew f M which is a develpmet fr M Fr each U' E U',m' let U be pe i X such that U M U', ad U c 0,m Let U = {U: U' E U' },m,m Fr each x E X ad Ew, let g(x) be a pe eighbrhd f x such that the g(x) 's satisfy the cditis f Therem 2.1, ad that g(x) = X fr each x E X. Let J = u I be a clsed etwrk fr X such that each I is Ew

TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume 5 1980 93 discrete. Fr each F E I, let U F be a pe set such c ~ wheever F ' E J, F ' ~ F. Let V U ({gi(x): i < ad F c gi(x)}). Sice the F F gi (x) I s satisfy prperty- (1) f Therem 2.1, V is pe. F Nw use Lemma 4.4 t iductively cstruct a sequ~ce V,V, 6f lcally fiit.e pe cvers f X such that 1 (i) V + star-refies V ; l (ii) V refies {V : F E J.} u {X - uj.} fr each i < ; F 1 1 (iii) V refies U.. u {X - M.} fr each i,j _< ; 1,J 1 (iv) every ui f elemets f U V. is regular pe.. 1 l< It is easy t see frm Lemma 4.2 that we may assume that if x E X, the {V E V.: x E V, i < } is a elemet f V 1 Claim I. Fr each x E X, fr each Ew, there exists mew such that st(x,v ) c g (x). m Prf f Claim I. There exists l > ad F E J I such that x E F l c g(x). (T get ~, we ca assume that each I is repeated ifiitely fte.) If x EVE V l, the by (ii), V c V = U ({gi (y): i 2. l ad F c gi (y)}) F F g (x). l Let m = + 1. The st(x,v ) is ctaied i sme m elemet f V I' s st (x, V ) c m g (x) Claim II. If H is clsed i x, ad y f H M, the there exists mew ad V E V such that y E V ad st(v,v ) m m H M ~. Prf f Claim II. If Y f M, there exists l such that y ~ 0 I. Let m = + l + 1, ad pick V E V with, m y E V. The st (V, V ) ewe V + W must be ctaied i I. m

94 Gruehage sme eleiet f U,U {X Each elemet f U,is,, ctaied i 0," s W c X - M. Thus st(v,v ) H m M ~. If Y E M, there exists " E 00 such that st(y,lj ), H M =~. Let m = + + 1, ad pick V E V with m y E V. The st(v,v ) ewe V+. But W c U fr sme m U E U ", where y E U M E lj' ". Thus U H M ~,,, s st(v,v ) H M ~. m Fr each x E X, let j(x) E 00 be such that x E Mj(x) U M.. Frm Claims I ad II, it is easy t see that, i<j (x) 1 fr each Ew, there is a least iteger l(,x) such that st(x,vl(,x» c g(x) - U M.. We defie g~(x) = {v E Vi: i<j (x) 1 x EVE V., i < l(j(x) +, x)}. By the statemet immedi 1 ately precedig Claim I we have g~(x) E Vl(j(x)+,x). It's t re~lly ecessary t have this, but we said we culd get it i the utlie i secti 3. Claim III. If Y E g~(x), the g~(y) c g~(x). Prf f Claim III. If Y E g~(x), the y E gj(x)+(x) c g(x), s g(y) c g(x). Sice g~(x) (U M.) = ~, i<j (x) 1 we have j(y) ~ j(x). Thus gj. (y)+(y) - U M. c i<j (y) 1 gj.(x)+(x) - U M. If l(j(y)+,y) < l(j(x)+,x), the i <j (x) 1 we wuld have st(x,vl(j(y)+,y» c st(y,vl(j(y)+,y» c gj. (y)+(y) -.U. M i c gj. (x)+(x) - U M.. This cl<j (y) i<j (x) 1 tradicts the defiiti f l(j(x)+,x). Thus l(j(y)+,y) > 1 (j (x) +,x), ad s 9 I (y)/ c 9 I (x) - I

TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume 5 1980 95 Fr each clsed set H, defie G(H) = U g' (x). By xeh Claim III, the cllecti {G (H): H clsed, HeX} is iterir-preservig. Sice g~(x) c g(x), the g~(x) 's satisfy prperty (2) f Therem 2.1, s if we defie B = {(X - G (H» 0: H clsed, Hex} the U B is a base fr X. By Lemma 5.1, each B is Ew clsure-preservig if G(H) is always regular pe. we are fiished after prvig the ext claim. S Claim IV. G(H) is regular pe. Prf f Claim IV. Suppse y E G(H) - G(H). There exists k E w such that y f u gk(x). xeh S, sice g~ (x) c gj (x) + (x), y $ Cl (U {g~ (x): x E H, j (x) > k}). By Claim II, fr each j < k, there exists m E wad j V. E V such that y E V. ad st(v.,v ) H M. = ~. J m. J J m j J J Let V = V. Suppse x E H, j(x) < k, ad g~(x) V ~ ~. j <k J Nw g~(x) is ctaied i sme W E Vl(j(x)+,x)' ad W Vj(x) ~~. If l(j(x)+,x) ~ mj(x)' the W c st(v. ( ) V ). But x E W H MJ.(x)' s J x, m j (x) x E st(v.( },V ) H M. (x)' ctradicti. Thus J x mj(x) J l(j (x)+,x) < m j (x). Let m = sup{m.}. j<k J Y ~ We see, the, that Cl (u{g~ (x): x E H, j (x) < k, 1 (j (x)+,x) ~ m}). Cmbiig this with the first paragraph, we have y t Cl(u{g~(x): x E H, l(j(x)+,x) ~ m}). Thus y is i the iterir f the clsure f thse g~(x) 's

96 Gruehage which are elemets f U V.. This c?tradicts the fact that i<m 1 uis f elemets f U V. are regular pe l ad the. 1 l<m prf that X is M I is fiished. Nw suppse Id X <. We will shw hw t btai Id(aB) < -l fr each B E U B. Sic~ a(a - Gk(H)) c Ew agk(h), we will be de if we ca get Id(aGk(H)) < -l fr a arbitrary k E wad clsed set H. By Lemma 4.4, we ca add the fllwig t the list f prperties f the sequece V,V I, : (v) Fr each Ew ad V E V, Id(aV) < -l. The sice each gk(x) is the itersecti f fiitely may members f U V., we have Id(agk(x)) < -l~ iew 1 Suppse y E agk(h). we see that there exists mew such that The by the prf f Claim IV, y t Cl (U {gk (x): x E Had gk (x) ~. U Vi}) l<m Thus there is a eighbrhd f y meetig ly fiitely may elemets f {gk(x): x E H}, ad s we have lc Id(aGk(H)) < -l. Sice X is hereditarily paracmpact, Id (dg (H» < -l. k 6. Clsed Images I this secti we prve Therem 3.2. We preset the mai part f the prf as a series f lemmas, sme f which may be f idepedet iterest. A map f: X ~ Y is irreducibze if prper clsed subset maps t Y.

TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume 5 1980 97 Lemma 6.1. Suppse X is stratifiable, ad f: X + Y is a clsed ctiuus surjecti. The there exists a clsed set X c X such that fl : X + f(x ) is irreducible, x ad Y - f(x ) is pe ad a-discrete. Prf By a therem f Okuyama [0], Y = Y U Y l, where each pit f Y has a cmpact pre-image, ad Y l a-discrete. Let C= {XI C X: Xl is clsed ad f(x I ) ~ Y}. is Partially rder Cby iclusi. It is easy t see frm the fact that f-l(y) is cmpact fr each y E Y that every chai [ i C has a lwer bud, amely [. Thus C has a miimal elemet X. X is clsed, ad Y - f(x ) C Y l, hece is a-discrete. The miimality f X fix: X + f(x ) is irreducible. [BL] implies that The ext lemma is essetially due t Brges ad Lutzer Lemma 6.2. If each clsed subset f X has a a-clsurepreservig uter base, ad f: X + Y is clsed ad irredu~ible, the each clsed subset f Y has a a-clsure-preservig uter base. Prf. Suppse Key is clsed. Let U = U U be a Ew is clsure-preserv uter base fr f-l(k) such that each 0 ig. Fr A C X, let f#(a) {y E Y: f-l(y) c A}. By [BL, Lemma 3.3], 0' = {f#(u): U EO} is clsure-preservig. Thus 0# = u 0# is a a-clsure-preservig uter base fr K. Ew Lemma 6.3. A clsed set K c X has a -clsure-preservig uter base if ad ly if fr each clsed HeX - K,

98 Gruehage there exists a sequece {G (H,K)} Ew such that (1) each G(H,K) is a regular pe set ctaiig H; (2) fr each E W 3 {G(H,K): H clsed 3 H K =~} is iterir-preservig; ad (3) fr each clsed HeX - K 3 there exists Ew such that G(H,K) K = ~. Prf. T see the "if" part, suppse we are give G (H,K)'s satisfyig (1)-(3). Let U = {(X - G (H,K»: G (H,K) K = ~}. By (3), U = U lj is a uter base fr Ew K. By (1), (2), ad Lemma 5.1, each U is clsure preservig. T see the "ly if" part, suppse U = U U is a Ew uter base fr K, where each U is clsure-preservig. Defie G (H,K) = X - U{U: U E U ad IT H = ~}. Clearly G (H,K) is pe ad ctais H. Sice U is a uter base fr K, (3) hlds. Sice the set f cmplemets f a clsure-preservig cllecti is iterir-preservig, (2) hlds. It remais t prve that G(H,K) is regular pe. Suppse x f G(H,K). The there is U E U with x E IT ad IT H =~. The U G(H,K) = ~, ad every pe set c taiig x meets U. Thus x f ~G--(H=-,K~) Lemma 6.4. Suppse Y = Y U Y 13 where Y is m tically rmal, Y is clsed 3 ad Y = Y - Y. Let K l be clsed i Y. If U is a iterir-preservig cllecti f relatively pe subsets f Y whse clsures miss K 3 the e ca assig t each U E U a set U* pe i Y such that

TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume 5 1980 99 U E U/}]. (1) U* Y u " (2) U* Y u; (3) U* K = ~; ad (4) if y E u'" where U' c U" the y E [iu*: Prf. Accrdig t [B 2, Therem 2.4], sice Y is mtically rmal, fr each x E Y ad pe eighbrhd U f x, e ca assig a pe eighbrhd U x that f x such (i) U c V => Ux c Vxi (ii) U x V y ~ l' => x E U r y E V. Nte that (ii) implies U c U. x Fr each U E U, let U* = U [(U U Y ) - K] That (1) xeu l x is satisfied is bvius. T see (2), suppse y E (U*' Y) - U. Let W be a pe eighbrhd f y such that W U ~~. Sice W U* ~ 1', there exists x E U such that y w [(U U Y ) - K)x ~~. This ctradicts prperty (ii) y l abve. T see (4), suppse y E U', where U' c U. The [ ( ( U ') U Y1) - K] y C [(U U Y1) - K] y c U* fr each U E UI. It remais t prve (3). Suppse y E U* K. Sice IT K = ij, it fllws frm (2) that y E Yl The (Yl)y U* ~ 1', s there exists x E U such that (Yl)y [U U Y ) l K]x ~ 1', agai ctradictig (ii) Lemma 6.5. Let X be stratifiable ad a-discrete" ad suppse fr each x E X we have assiged a eighbrhd O(x) f x. The e ca assig t each x E X a pe eighbrhd U(x) f x such that

100 Gruehage ( 1) U (x) c a (x) ; (2) y E U(x) ~ U(y) c U(x); (3) if HeX is ezsed 3 the U U(x) is pe ad xeh clsed. Prf. The prf is similar t that f [G Therem 2, 1]. Let X = U F, where each F is clsed discrete, ad Ew F F = ~ if m ~. Fr each x E X, let (x) be the m least iteger such that x E F(x). Let D be a mte rmality peratr fr X. Iductively, defie, fr each x E X, a set U(x) ctaiig x such that (i) {U(x): x E F } is a discrete cllecti f pe ad clsed sets; ad (ii) U(x) c a(x) D({x}, u F.) ({u(y): x E U(y) i < (x) 1 ad (y) < (x) }. Sice X is a-dimesial ad cllectiwise-rmal, the abve cstructi ca easily be carried ut. These U(x) 's clearly satisfy (1). Als, if Y E U(x), the (x) < (y), s U(y) c U(x) by (ii). Thus (2) hlds. Fially, t see (3), suppse H is clsed ad y f U U(x). xeh The D(H,{y}) ~ D({x}, u F.) fr all x E H with i<(x) 1 (x) > (y). Thus D (H, {y}) ~ U{U (x): x E H, (x) > (y) }, ad s y ~ U{U(x): x E H, (x) > (y)}. But U{U(x): x E H, (x) < (y)} is pe ad clsed. Thus y ~ U U(x). xeh Lemma 6.6. Suppse Y is stratifiable 3 Y = Y U Yl~ where Y is clsed, Y is a-discrete, ad Y Y l =~. If l every clsed subset f Y has a a-clsure-preservig uter

TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume 5 1980 101 base i Y' the every clsed subset f Y has a -clsurepreservig uter base. Prf. Fr a clsed set Hey, let H = H Y ad HI = H Y Let Key be clsed. We will shw that K has l. a -clsure-preservig uter base. Fr clsed Hey - K, let G(H,K ) be a relatively pe subset f Y havig the prperties f Lemma 6.3. If G(H,K ) K = ~; let G(H,K )* be as i Lemma 6.4. Otherwise, let G(H,K )* Y. Let {g(y): Y E Y, Ew} have the prperties f Therem 2.1. Let Y U' where each U is pe ad Ew ctais U + l. Fr each x E Y - K, let O(x) l = [(U(x) U (x)+2) g(x) (x)] - such that x E U(x). K, where (x) is the largest iteger Let U(x) be as i Lemma 6.5 applied t Y. 1 Nw fr H clsed, Hey - K, ad Ew, defie V (H,K) = G (H,K ) * U (U {U (x) : x E [G (H, K ) * U H] Y }). 0 0 l We will shw that prperties (1)-(3) f Lemma 6.3 hld fr the V(H,K) IS. First we will shw that V(H,K) Y = G(H,K ). Suppse t. The there exists Y E V(H,K) - G(H,K ). Observe by Lemma 6.5 that V(H,K) Y l is pe ad clsed i Y l. Thus Y E Y. By Lemma 6.4, y $ G(H,K )*. Als y $ H, s there exists Ew such that y ~ Cl(U{g (x): 0 x E G(H,K )* U H}). Thus y ~ C1(U{U(x): x E (G(H,K )* U H) Y U }). But C1(U{U(x): x E (G(H,K )* U H) l Yl (Y - U )}) c Y - U +1. Thus Y ~ V (H,K), ctradicti.

102 Gruehage Clearly V(H,K) is pe ad ctais H. Suppse y E V(H,K) - V(H,K). Sice V(H,K) Y l is clsed i Y l, we have y E Y V (H,K) = G (H,K ) Sice G (H.,K ) is regular pe i Y' each eighbrhd f Y ctais a pit Z E Y - G(H,K ) The z t V(H,K). Thus V(H,K) is regular pe, ad s prperty (1) f Lemma 6.3 hlds. T see (2), suppse II' is a cllecti f clsed sets missig K, ad y E V (H, K). We may assume V(H,K) ~ Y. HE II' The y t K. If Y E Y the U(y) C V(H;K) fr each H E l, II' If Y E Y' the ye G (H,K ), s by Lemma 6.4, HEll' 0 0 y E ( G (H,K )*)0 c V (H,K). Thus (2) hlds. HEll' 0 0 HEll' Fially, t see (3), let Hex - K be clsed. There ~. If Y E V(H,K) K, the sice V(H,K) Y G(H,K )' we have y E Y l But V(H,K) Y is clsed i Y ad misses K. Thus V(H,K) I I K = ~. Prf f Therem 3.2. Therem 3.2 prperty (*). Let us call the prperty f Suppse X is a stratifiable space satisfyig (*), ad let f: X ~ Y be a clsed map f X t Y. The Y is stratifiable. We eed t shw that Y satisfies (*). Let Key be clsed. Sice fl f-l(k) is clsed, by Lemma 6.1, there exists a clsed set K C K such that K is the clsed irreducible image f a clsed subset f f-l(k), ad K - K is a-discrete. By Lemma 6.2, ad the fact that every clsed subset f X satisfies (*), we see that every

TOPOLOGY PROCEEDINGS Vlume 5 1980 103 clsed subset f K has a a-clsure-preservig uter base i K. The by Lemma 6.6, every clsed subset f K has a a-clsure-preservig uter base i K. Thus Y satisfies (*) Refereces [B ] C. R. Brges, O stratifiable spaces, Pacific J. l Math. 17 (1966), 1-16. [B 2 ], Fur geeralizatis f stratifiable [BL] [C] [F] spaces, Geeral Tplgy ad its Relatis t Mder Aalysis ad Algebra, Prague Sympsium, 1971, 73-76., Direct sums f stratifiable spaces, Fud. Math. C (1978), 97-99. ad D. Lutzer, Characterizatis ad mappigs f Mi-spaces, Tplgy Cferece VPI, Spriger Verlag Lecture Ntes i Mathematics, N. 375, 34-40. J. Ceder, Sme geeralizatis f metric spaces, Pacific J. Math. 11 (1961),105-125. B. Fitzpatrick, Jr., Sme tplgically cmplete spaces, Geeral Tbplgy ad its Applicatis 1 (1971), 101-103. [G ] G. Gruehage, Stratifiable spaces are M2, Tplgy l Prceedigs 1 (1976), 221-226. [G ], Stratifiable a-discrete spaces are M l, 2 Prc. AIDer. Math. Sc. 72 (1978), 189-190. [He] [HJ] [HLZ] R. Heath, Stratifiable spaces are a-spaces, Ntices AIDer. Math. Sc. 16 (1969), 761. ad H. Juila, Stratifiable spaces as subspaces ad ctiuus images f M l -spaces (pre prit). R. Heath, D. Lutzer, ad P. Zer, Mtically rmal spaces, Tras. AIDer. Math. Sc. 178 (1973), 481-493. [Hy] D. M. Hyma, A categry slightly larger tha the metric ad CW-categries, Mich. Math. J. 15 (1968), 193-214.

104 Gruehage [J ] H. J. K. Jui1a, Neighbrets, Pacific J. Math. 1 76 (1968), 83-103. [J ], Stratifiable spaces as subspaces ad c 2 tiuus images f M 1 -spaces, hadwritte tes. [M] T. Mizkami, O Nagata's prblem fr paracmpact a-metric spaces, Tplgy ad App1. II (1980), 211 221. [N ] J. Nagata, A survey f the thery f geeralized 1 metric spaces, Prc. Third Prague Sympsium, 1971, 321-331. [N ], O Hyma's M-space, Tplgy Cferece 2 VPI, Spriger-Verlag Lecture Ntes i Mathematics N. 375, 198-208. [0] A. Okuyama, a-spaces ad clsed mappigs, I, Prc. [S] Japa Acad. 44 (1968), 472-477. F. Slaughter, The clsed image f a metrizable space is M Prc. AIDer. Math. Sc. 37 (1973), 309-314. 1, Aubur Uiversity Aubur, Alabama 36849