HWRF Dynamics The WRF-NMM

Similar documents
The WRF NMM Core. Zavisa Janjic Talk modified and presented by Matthew Pyle

WRF Modeling System Overview

The Advanced Research WRF (ARW) Dynamics Solver

THE NCEP WRF NMM CORE

Fall Colloquium on the Physics of Weather and Climate: Regional Weather Predictability and Modelling. 29 September - 10 October, 2008

CAM-SE: Lecture I. Peter Hjort Lauritzen

WRF Modeling System Overview

5. General Circulation Models

Weather Research and Forecasting Model. Melissa Goering Glen Sampson ATMO 595E November 18, 2004

Using hybrid isentropic-sigma vertical coordinates in nonhydrostatic atmospheric modeling

Split explicit methods

MODEL TYPE (Adapted from COMET online NWP modules) 1. Introduction

Formulation and performance of the Variable-Cubic Atmospheric Model

WRF Modeling System Overview

NWP Equations (Adapted from UCAR/COMET Online Modules)

Mass Conserving Courant Number Independent Eulerian Advection of the Moisture Quantities for the LMK

The Fifth-Generation NCAR / Penn State Mesoscale Model (MM5) Mark Decker Feiqin Xie ATMO 595E November 23, 2004 Department of Atmospheric Science

Jacobians of transformation 115, 343 calculation of 199. Klemp and Wilhelmson open boundary condition 159 Kuo scheme 190

ECMWF Overview. The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts is an international. organisation supported by 23 European States.

ρ x + fv f 'w + F x ρ y fu + F y Fundamental Equation in z coordinate p = ρrt or pα = RT Du uv tanφ Dv Dt + u2 tanφ + vw a a = 1 p Dw Dt u2 + v 2

ICON. The Icosahedral Nonhydrostatic model: Formulation of the dynamical core and physics-dynamics coupling

Challenges and Opportunities in Modeling of the Global Atmosphere

Wind Flow Modeling The Basis for Resource Assessment and Wind Power Forecasting

AMS 17th Conference on Numerical Weather Predition, 1-5 August 2005, Washington D.C. Paper 16A.3

ICON. The Icosahedral Nonhydrostatic modelling framework

1 Introduction to Governing Equations 2 1a Methodology... 2

Evaluation of mountain drag schemes from regional simulation Steve Garner GFDL

Lecture #3: Gravity Waves in GCMs. Charles McLandress (Banff Summer School 7-13 May 2005)

Hydrodynamic conservation laws and turbulent friction in atmospheric circulation models

Overview of the Numerics of the ECMWF. Atmospheric Forecast Model

Non-local Momentum Transport Parameterizations. Joe Tribbia NCAR.ESSL.CGD.AMP

Description of. Jimy Dudhia Dave Gill. Bill Skamarock. WPS d1 output. WPS d2 output Real and WRF. real.exe General Functions.

The Shallow Water Equations

WRF Modeling System Overview

APPENDIX B. The primitive equations

Comparing the formulations of CCAM and VCAM and aspects of their performance

The PRECIS Regional Climate Model

The dynamics of high and low pressure systems

A semi-implicit non-hydrostatic covariant dynamical kernel using spectral representation in the horizontal and a height based vertical coordinate

Linear model for investigation of nonlinear NWP model accuracy. Marko Zirk, University of Tartu

WRF Modeling System Overview

Open boundary conditions in numerical simulations of unsteady incompressible flow

NCEP non-hydrostatic regional model and surface scheme LAPS: A dynamical scaling tool for use in agricultural models

MEA 716 Exercise, BMJ CP Scheme With acknowledgements to B. Rozumalski, M. Baldwin, and J. Kain Optional Review Assignment, distributed Th 2/18/2016

Lecture 3. Turbulent fluxes and TKE budgets (Garratt, Ch 2)

Weather Forecasting Models in Met Éireann. Eoin Whelan UCD Seminar 3 rd April 2012

ICON-IAP: A non-hydrostatic global. Almut Gassmann IAP Kühlungsborn, Germany. model designed for energetic consistency

Dust devils, water spouts, tornados

Internal Wave Modeling in Oceanic General Circulation Models

Tangent-linear and adjoint models in data assimilation

12.1 THE NCEP NONHYDROSTATIC MESOSCALE FORECASTING MODEL

Logistics. Goof up P? R? Can you log in? Requests for: Teragrid yes? NCSA no? Anders Colberg Syrowski Curtis Rastogi Yang Chiu

Model description of AGCM5 of GFD-Dennou-Club edition. SWAMP project, GFD-Dennou-Club

Operational weather Prediction(SEECOP)

Physics/Dynamics coupling

Improvements to the NCEP Global and Regional Data Assimilation Systems

Idealized Nonhydrostatic Supercell Simulations in the Global MPAS

INTERNAL GRAVITY WAVES

MOX EXPONENTIAL INTEGRATORS FOR MULTIPLE TIME SCALE PROBLEMS OF ENVIRONMENTAL FLUID DYNAMICS. Innsbruck Workshop October

The applicability of Monin Obukhov scaling for sloped cooled flows in the context of Boundary Layer parameterization

Regional Scale Modeling and Numerical Weather Prediction

Egyptian Meteorological Authority Cairo Numerical Weather prediction centre

Atmospheric Dynamics

Evolution of the GFDL hurricane model in research and transition to NMC operations

CESM2 release of CAM-SE (& CAM-SE-CSLAM)

A Proposed Test Suite for Atmospheric Model Dynamical Cores

Data Received: 20 September 2010 Revised: 3 January 2011 Accepted: 11 January 2011 Published: 1 February 2011

Chapter 3. Stability theory for zonal flows :formulation

Univ. of Maryland-College Park, Dept. of Atmos. & Oceanic Science. NOAA/NCEP/Environmental Modeling Center

2 Equations of Motion

The 'Conservative Dynamical Core' priority. developments in the COSMO model

Meteorology 6150 Cloud System Modeling

Cloud parameterization and cloud prediction scheme in Eta numerical weather model

Fundamentals of Weather and Climate

The spectral transform method

The Runge-Kutta method

Generalizing the Boussinesq Approximation to Stratified Compressible Flow

Towards the Fourth GEWEX Atmospheric Boundary Layer Model Inter-Comparison Study (GABLS4)

Exploring Gravity Wave Dynamics, Sources, and Predictability in DeepWave

Chapter 1. Introduction

A Global Atmospheric Model. Joe Tribbia NCAR Turbulence Summer School July 2008

Lateral Boundary Conditions

MCIPv3: Using WRF-EM Output with CMAQ

Hydrostatic Equation and Thermal Wind. Meteorology 411 Iowa State University Week 5 Bill Gallus

(Adapted from COMET online NWP modules) 1. Introduction

NCEP s "NAM" (North American Mesoscale) model WRF-NMM. NCEP =National Centers for Environmental Prediction

Variable-Resoluiton Global Atmospheric Modeling Spanning Convective to Planetary Scales

( )e ikx. ( ) = ˆq k

Deutscher Wetterdienst

A Study of Convective Initiation Failure on 22 Oct 2004

Contents. Parti Fundamentals. 1. Introduction. 2. The Coriolis Force. Preface Preface of the First Edition

Design of a Nonhydrostatic Atmospheric Model Based on a Generalized Vertical Coordinate

Math background. Physics. Simulation. Related phenomena. Frontiers in graphics. Rigid fluids

2.5 Shallow water equations, quasigeostrophic filtering, and filtering of inertia-gravity waves

Goal: Use understanding of physically-relevant scales to reduce the complexity of the governing equations

WRF Model Simulated Proxy Datasets Used for GOES-R Research Activities

EAS372 Open Book Final Exam 11 April, 2013

M.Sc. in Meteorology. Physical Meteorology Prof Peter Lynch. Mathematical Computation Laboratory Dept. of Maths. Physics, UCD, Belfield.

How is balance of a forecast ensemble affected by adaptive and non-adaptive localization schemes?

ESCI 485 Air/Sea Interaction Lesson 1 Stresses and Fluxes Dr. DeCaria

Transcription:

HWRF Dynamics The WRF-NMM Zavisa Janjic Creator of the NMM Samuel Trahan - Presenter Matt Pyle

NMM Dynamic Solver Basic Principles Equations / Variables Model Integration Horizontal Grid Spatial Discretization Vertical Grid Boundary Conditions Dissipative Processes Namelist switches Summary

Basic Principles Use full compressible equations split into hydrostatic and nonhydrostatic contributions Easy comparison of hydro and nonhydro solutions Reduced computational effort at lower resolutions Apply modeling principles proven in previous NWP and regional climate applications Use methods that minimize the generation of small-scale noise Robust, computationally efficient

Mass Based Vertical Coordinate To simplify discussion of the model equations, consider a sigma coordinate to represent a vertical coordinate based on hydrostatic pressure ( ): t * s t t s

dt dw g 1 v k v v v v f p t ) (1 ] [ p p t p c T T = t T p v v ) ( ) ( v t p RT Momentum eqn. Thermodynamic eqn. Hydrostatic Continuity eqn. WRF-NMM dynamical equations inviscid, adiabatic, sigma form Analogous to a hydrostatic system, except for p and, where p is the total (nonhydrostatic) pressure and is defined below. * Janjic et al. 21, MWR

* Hypsometric eqn. RT p Nonhydro var. definition (restated) 3rd eqn of motion 1 g dw dt p 1 generally is small. Even a large vertical acceleration of 2 m/s in 1 s produces of only ~.2, and nonhydrostatic pressure deviations of ~2 Pa. Nonhydrostatic continuity eqn. w 1 g d dt 1 g ( t v σ σ σ )

Properties of system *, w, and are not independent no independent prognostic equation for w! << 1 in meso- and large-scale atmospheric flows. Generically, the impact of nonhydrostatic dynamics becomes detectable at resolutions < 1 km, and important at ~1 km.

Vertical boundary conditions for model equations * Top:, p Surface:, ( p )

WRF-NMM predictive variables Mass variables: PD hydrostatic pressure depth (time/space varying component) (Pa) PINT nonhydrostatic pressure (Pa) T Q sensible temperature (K) specific humidity (kg/kg) CWM total cloud water condensate (kg/kg) Q2 2 * turbulent kinetic energy (m 2 /s 2 ) Wind variables: U,V wind components (m/s)

Model Integration Explicit time differencing preferred where possible, as allows for better phase speeds and more transparent coding: horizontal advection of u, v, T advection of q, cloud water, TKE ( passive substances ) Implicit time differencing for very fast processes that would require a restrictively short time step for numerical stability: vertical advection of u, v, T and vertically propagating sound waves

Model Integration Horizontal advection of u, v, T ) ( 2 1 ) ( 2 3 Δ 1 1 y f y f t y y ) (.533 ) ( 1.533 Δ 1 1 y f y f t y y 2 nd order Adams-Bashforth: Stability/Amplification: A-B has a weak linear instability (amplification) which either can be tolerated or can be stabilized by a slight offcentering as is done in the WRF-NMM. *

Model Integration Vertical advection of u, v, & T * Crank-Nicolson (w/ off centering in time): Stability: y 1 Δt y 1 [1.1 2 f ( y 1 ).9 f ( y )] An implicit method, it is absolutely stable numerically. Short time steps still needed for accuracy.

Cross-section of temperatures 18 h into an integration experiencing strong orographically-forced vertical motion and using centered in time C-N vertical advection

Cross-section of temperatures 18 h into an integration experiencing strong orographically-forced vertical motion and using off-centered in time C-N vertical advection.

Model Integration Advection of TKE (Q2) and moisture (Q, CWM, species) Traditionally has taken an approach similar to the Janjic (1997) scheme used in Eta model: Starts with an initial upstream advection step Anti-diffusion/anti-filtering step applied to reduce dispersiveness Conservation enforced after each anti-filtering step maintain global sum of advected quantity prevent generation of new extrema Eulerian advection also available, but not used by HWRF.

Model Integration Subroutine sequence within solve_nmm (ignoring physics): (3%) (21%) (32%) (1%) (6%) PDTE integrates mass flux divergence, computes vertical velocity and updates hydrostatic pressure. ADVE horizontal and vertical advection of T, u, v, Coriolis and curvature terms applied. ADV2/ADV2_SCAL (typically every other step) vertical/horizontal advection of q, CWM, TKE VTOA updates nonhydrostatic pressure, applies w term to thermodynamic equation VADZ/HADZ vertical/horizontal advection of height. w=dz/dt updated. (approximate relative % of dynamics time spent in these subroutines)

Model Integration Subroutine sequence within solve_nmm (cont): (9%) (11%) (<1%) (14%) (1%) (<1%) EPS vertical and horizontal advection of dz/dt, vertical sound wave treatment. HDIFF horizontal diffusion BOCOH boundary update at mass points PFDHT calculates PGF, updates winds due to PGF, computes divergence. DDAMP divergence damping BOCOV boundary update at wind points\ Nest motion Diagnostics

All dynamical processes every fundamental time step, except. t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 passive substance advection, every other time step Model time step dt specified in model namelist.input is for the fundamental time step. Generally about 2.25x** the horizontal grid spacing (km), or 35x the namelist.input dy value (degrees lat). ** runs w/o parameterized convection may benefit from limiting the time step to about 1.9-2.x the grid spacing.

Impact on variation of x over domain * For a domain spanning 1N to 7N: Δ x cos( lat ) o o cos(7 Regular lat-lon grid cos(3 ) / cos(1 ) / cos( ).347 Rotated lat-lon grid ).866

Sample rotated lat-lon domain On a regular lat-lon map background On a rotated lat-lon map background (same rotation as model grid).

The E-grid Stagger H v H v H v H (v) v H v H v H v (H) H v H v H v H (v) v H v H v H v (H) H v H v H v H (v) H=mass point, v=wind point red=(1,1) ; blue=(1,2)

The E-grid Stagger H v H v H v H (v) v H v H v H v (H) H v H v H v H (v) v H v H v H v (H) H v H v H v H (v) XDIM=4 (# of mass points on odd numbered row) YDIM=5 (number of rows)

The E-grid Stagger v H - Conventional grid spacing is the diagonal distance d. d dy - Grid spacings in the WPS and WRF namelists are the dx and dy values, specified in fractions of a degree for the WRF-NMM. H dx v - WRF domain wizard takes input grid spacing d in km and computes the angular distances dx and dy for the namelist.

Spatial Discretization General Philosophy Mimetic approach http://www.math.unm.edu/~stanly/mimetic/mimetic.html Conserve energy and enstrophy to control nonlinear energy cascade reduce the need for numerical filtering Conserve some first order and quadratic quantities (mass, momentum, energy, ) Use consistent order of accuracy for advection and divergence operators and the omega-alpha term; consistent transformations between KE and PE in the hydrostatic limit. Preserve properties of differential operators.

NMM Formal 4th order Advection and divergence operators each point talks to all eight neighboring points (isotropic)

mass point wind point 1/3 of the contribution to divergence/advection comes from these N/S and E/W fluxes.

mass point wind point avg wind point 2/3 of the contribution to divergence/advection comes from these diagonal fluxes.

Horizontal temperature advection detail (computerese) T 5 T 8 T 9 V 4 T 4 V 3 T 1 V 1 T 2 T 7 V 2 T 6 For each T n, there is an associated layer pressure depth (here denoted dp n ). There also is a dx n specific to each point T 3

NMM Vertical Coordinate Pressure-sigma hybrid (Arakawa and Lamb, 1977) Has the desirable properties of a terrain-following pressure coordinate: Exact mass (etc.) conservation Nondivergent flow remains on pressure surfaces No problems with weak static stability No discontinuities or internal boundary conditions And an additional benefit from the hybrid: Flat coordinate surfaces at high altitudes where sigma problems worst (e.g., Simmons and Burridge, 1981)

-2.5-2.5 2.5 2.5 15 km sigma sigma-p hybrid Wind developing due to the spurious pressure gradient force in an idealized integration. The hybrid coordinate boundary between the pressure and sigma domains is at ~4 hpa.

Pressure-Sigma Hybrid Vertical Coordinate P T PD TOP pressure range eta=. eta 2 eta 1 1 P T +PD TOP.4 PD sigma range eta 1 1 eta 2 1 P T +PD TOP +PD = eta 1 * PD TOP + eta 2 * PD + P T 1.

Equations in Hybrid Coordinate * pressure range p w ( v) p PD σ w sigma range PD t σ ( PD σ ) ( PD v) σ

Vertical discretization v,t v,t v,t Lorenz P, w, Z P, w, Z P, w, Z P, w, Z Vertical advection combines the advective fluxes computed above and below the layer of interest.

Lateral Boundary Conditions Lateral boundary information prescribed only on outermost row: H v H v H v H v H v H v H v H v H v H v Pure boundary information Avg of surrounding H points (blends boundary and interior) Freely evolving Upstream advection in three rows next to the boundary No computational outflow boundary condition for advection Enhanced divergence damping close to the boundaries.

Dissipative Processes lateral diffusion A 2 nd order, nonlinear Smagorinsky-type horizontal diffusion is utilized: Diffusion strength a function of the local TKE, deformation of the 3D flow, and a namelist-specified diffusion strength variable (coac). Lateral diffusion is zeroed for model surfaces sloping more than 4.5 m per km (.45) by default. This slope limit can be adjusted with the namelist variable slophc. slophc is expressed as sqrt(2) times the true slope (making the.45 default ~.636)

Dissipative Processes - divergence damping * Internal mode damping (on each vertical layer) v j v j ( dp j1v j1 dp j1v ( dp dp ) j1 j1 j1 ) DDMPV External mode damping (vertically integrated) v j v j ( dp ( j 1v j1 dp j1v dp j1 dp j1 ) j1 ) DDMPV DDMPV 2 dt CODAMP CODAMP is a namelist controlled variable = 6.4 by default.

Gravity Wave Drag & Mountain Blocking Accounts for sub-grid scale mountain effects: mountain waves (GWD) and stability-dependent blocking of lowlevel flow around topography (MB). More important for coarser grid spacing (> ~1 km) and longer (multi-day) integrations. gwd_opt=2 in physics namelist to invoke for the WRF- NMM. Benefits overall synoptic patterns and near-surface wind and temperature forecasts. Based on the GFS model package for GWD (Alpert et al., 1988, 1996; Kim & Arakawa,1995) and MB (Lott & Miller, 1997). Courtesy of Brad Ferrier

Relatively new NMM namelist switches &dynamics wp =. coac =.75, codamp = 6.4, slophc =.6364 Defaults WP - off-centering weight in nonhydrostatic computation (value of ~.1 improves stability of some sub-1.5 km grid forecasts). COAC - diffusion strength (larger more diffusive smoothing) CODAMP - divergence damping strength (larger more damping, fewer small-scale regions of divergence). SLOPHC - max surface slope for diffusion (larger value applies lateral diffusion over more mountainous terrain).

A corrected namelist switch in WRFV3.4 &dynamics non_hydrostatic =.true. Default If.false., the model will run as a hydrostatic system. May make sense for > ~2 km grid spacing where nonhydrostatic effects are minimal the model runs more quickly (~2%) in hydrostatic mode.