Ting Lei, Xuguang Wang University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA. Wang and Lei, MWR, Daryl Kleist (NCEP): dual resolution 4DEnsVar

Similar documents
Development and research of GSI based hybrid EnKF Var data assimilation for HWRF to improve hurricane prediction

Hybrid Variational Ensemble Data Assimilation for Tropical Cyclone

Ensemble 4DVAR for the NCEP hybrid GSI EnKF data assimilation system and observation impact study with the hybrid system

Ensemble 4DVAR and observa3on impact study with the GSIbased hybrid ensemble varia3onal data assimila3on system. for the GFS

Retrospective and near real-time tests of GSIbased EnKF-Var hybrid data assimilation system for HWRF with airborne radar data

GSI 3DVar-based Ensemble-Variational Hybrid Data Assimilation for NCEP Global Forecast System: Single Resolution Experiments

Xuguang Wang and Ting Lei. School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma and Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, Norman, OK.

GSI 3DVar-Based Ensemble Variational Hybrid Data Assimilation for NCEP Global Forecast System: Single-Resolution Experiments

Improving GFS 4DEnVar Hybrid Data Assimilation System Using Time-lagged Ensembles

Hybrid variational-ensemble data assimilation. Daryl T. Kleist. Kayo Ide, Dave Parrish, John Derber, Jeff Whitaker

Multivariate Correlations: Applying a Dynamic Constraint and Variable Localization in an Ensemble Context

Assimilation of Airborne Doppler Radar Observations Using the Unified GSI based Hybrid Ensemble Variational Data Assimilation System for HWRF

P 1.86 A COMPARISON OF THE HYBRID ENSEMBLE TRANSFORM KALMAN FILTER (ETKF)- 3DVAR AND THE PURE ENSEMBLE SQUARE ROOT FILTER (EnSRF) ANALYSIS SCHEMES

Comparing Variational, Ensemble-based and Hybrid Data Assimilations at Regional Scales

Hybrid Variational-Ensemble Data Assimilation at NCEP. Daryl Kleist

Testing and Evaluation of GSI Hybrid Data Assimilation for Basin-scale HWRF: Lessons We Learned

Univ. of Maryland-College Park, Dept. of Atmos. & Oceanic Science. NOAA/NCEP/Environmental Modeling Center

Comparisons between 4DEnVar and 4DVar on the Met Office global model

Development and Research of GSI-based EnVar System to Assimilate Radar Observations for Convective Scale Analysis and Forecast

(Toward) Scale-dependent weighting and localization for the NCEP GFS hybrid 4DEnVar Scheme

Assimilation of Radar Radial Velocity Data with the WRF Hybrid Ensemble-3DVAR System for the Prediction of Hurricane Ike (2008)

Development and Research of GSI- based Var/EnKF/EnVar/ Hybrid System to Assimilate Radar ObservaBons for ConvecBve Scale NWP

The Structure of Background-error Covariance in a Four-dimensional Variational Data Assimilation System: Single-point Experiment

Mesoscale Ensemble Data Assimilation: Opportunities and Challenges. Fuqing Zhang Penn State University

Kalman Filter and Ensemble Kalman Filter

A Hybrid ETKF 3DVAR Data Assimilation Scheme for the WRF Model. Part I: Observing System Simulation Experiment

Estimating Observation Impact in a Hybrid Data Assimilation System: Experiments with a Simple Model

DA/Initialization/Ensemble Development Team Milestones and Priorities

Data Assimilation Development for the FV3GFSv2

Plans for NOAA s regional ensemble systems: NARRE, HRRRE, and a regional hybrid assimilation

Four-Dimensional Ensemble Kalman Filtering

University of Miami/RSMAS

GSI Data Assimilation System Support and Testing Activities: 2013 Annual Update

EARLY ONLINE RELEASE

Can hybrid-4denvar match hybrid-4dvar?

Accelerating the spin-up of Ensemble Kalman Filtering

Inter-comparison of 4D-Var and EnKF systems for operational deterministic NWP

H. LIU AND X. ZOU AUGUST 2001 LIU AND ZOU. The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Improved analyses and forecasts with AIRS retrievals using the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter

GSI Tutorial Background and Observation Errors: Estimation and Tuning. Daryl Kleist NCEP/EMC June 2011 GSI Tutorial

Relative Merits of 4D-Var and Ensemble Kalman Filter

Monthly Weather Review The Hybrid Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter

Assimilation of Radar Radial Velocity Data with the WRF Hybrid Ensemble 3DVAR System for the Prediction of Hurricane Ike (2008)

Estimating Observation Impact in a Hybrid Data Assimilation System: Experiments with a Simple Model

4DEnVar. Four-Dimensional Ensemble-Variational Data Assimilation. Colloque National sur l'assimilation de données

The Developmental Testbed Center: Update on Data Assimilation System Testing and Community Support

Data assimilation; comparison of 4D-Var and LETKF smoothers

Motivation & Goal. We investigate a way to generate PDFs from a single deterministic run

Generating climatological forecast error covariance for Variational DAs with ensemble perturbations: comparison with the NMC method

A pseudo-ensemble hybrid data assimilation system for HWRF

Numerical Weather Prediction: Data assimilation. Steven Cavallo

Evolution of Forecast Error Covariances in 4D-Var and ETKF methods

Implementation and Evaluation of WSR-88D Radial Velocity Data Assimilation for WRF-NMM via GSI

Current Issues and Challenges in Ensemble Forecasting

The ECMWF Hybrid 4D-Var and Ensemble of Data Assimilations

Ensemble Kalman Filter potential

Fundamentals of Data Assimilation

How 4DVAR can benefit from or contribute to EnKF (a 4DVAR perspective)

PSU HFIP 2010 Summary: Performance of the ARW-EnKF Real-time Cloud-resolving TC Ensemble Analysis and Forecasting System.

Configuration of All-sky Microwave Radiance Assimilation in the NCEP's GFS Data Assimilation System

Convective-scale NWP for Singapore

Impact of Assimilating Aircraft Reconnaissance Observations in Operational HWRF

Chengsi Liu 1, Ming Xue 1, 2, Youngsun Jung 1, Lianglv Chen 3, Rong Kong 1 and Jingyao Luo 3 ISDA 2019

The Big Leap: Replacing 4D-Var with 4D-EnVar and life ever since

Assimilate W88D Doppler Vr for Humberto 05

J1.3 GENERATING INITIAL CONDITIONS FOR ENSEMBLE FORECASTS: MONTE-CARLO VS. DYNAMIC METHODS

Current and Future Experiments to Improve Assimilation of Surface Winds from Satellites in Global Models

HFIP ENSEMBLE PLAN. Jun Du (EMC/NCEP), presenting on behalf of the HFIP Ensemble Team:

In the derivation of Optimal Interpolation, we found the optimal weight matrix W that minimizes the total analysis error variance.

1. Introduction. Yujie PAN 1,3, Ming XUE 1,2,3, Kefeng ZHU 2,3, and Mingjun WANG 2,3

Impact of Targeted Dropsonde Data on Mid-latitude Numerical Weather Forecasts during the 2011 Winter Storms Reconnaissance Program

Variational data assimilation of lightning with WRFDA system using nonlinear observation operators

Convective-scale data assimilation in the Weather Research and Forecasting model using a nonlinear ensemble filter

13A. 4 Analysis and Impact of Super-obbed Doppler Radial Velocity in the NCEP Grid-point Statistical Interpolation (GSI) Analysis System

Discussion on HFIP RDITT Experiments. Proposal for extending the life of RDITT for one more year: Future Plans from Individual Groups

Exploring ensemble forecast calibration issues using reforecast data sets

Development of the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter

Four-dimensional ensemble Kalman filtering

Middle Atmosphere Operational Data Assimilation with the Use of Ensembles

EARLY ONLINE RELEASE

A Comparison of Hybrid Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter Optimum Interpolation and Ensemble Square Root Filter Analysis Schemes

Tests of an Ensemble Kalman Filter for Mesoscale and Regional-Scale Data Assimilation. Part III: Comparison with 3DVAR in a Real-Data Case Study

THE IMPACT OF DIFFERENT DATA FIELDS ON STORM-SSCALE DATA ASSIMILATION

Research Article The Development of a Hybrid EnKF-3DVAR Algorithm for Storm-Scale Data Assimilation

3.23 IMPROVING VERY-SHORT-TERM STORM PREDICTIONS BY ASSIMILATING RADAR AND SATELLITE DATA INTO A MESOSCALE NWP MODEL

2012 and changes to the Rapid Refresh and HRRR weather forecast models

Model error and parameter estimation

The Use of GPS Radio Occultation Data for Tropical Cyclone Prediction. Bill Kuo and Hui Liu UCAR

Experiments of Hurricane Initialization with Airborne Doppler Radar Data for the Advancedresearch Hurricane WRF (AHW) Model

Representation of model error for data assimilation on convective scale

Abstract 2. ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTERS 1. INTRODUCTION

Ensemble Prediction Systems

Advances and Challenges in Ensemblebased Data Assimilation in Meteorology. Takemasa Miyoshi

Assimilation of cloud/precipitation data at regional scales

National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado. (Manuscript received 26 March 2013, in final form 28 August 2013) ABSTRACT

University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma. June 6, 2012 Submitted to Weather and Forecasting Revised November 3, 2012

P3.11 A COMPARISON OF AN ENSEMBLE OF POSITIVE/NEGATIVE PAIRS AND A CENTERED SPHERICAL SIMPLEX ENSEMBLE

Met Office convective-scale 4DVAR system, tests and improvement

Applications of an ensemble Kalman Filter to regional ocean modeling associated with the western boundary currents variations

Some Applications of WRF/DART

Transcription:

GSI-based four dimensional ensemble-variational (4DEnsVar) data assimilation: formulation and single resolution experiments with real data for NCEP GFS Ting Lei, Xuguang Wang University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA Wang and Lei, MWR, 203 Daryl Kleist (NCEP): dual resolution 4DEnsVar Acknowledgement: NCEP DA team (John Derber, Dave Parrish, Russ Treadon, Miodrag Rancic) and Jeff Whitaker (NOAA ESRL) 6 th WMO Symposium on data assimilation College Park, MD, USA Oct. 7-, 203

Background Over the past three years, significant efforts were conducted to develop GSI hybrid system and test with US operational Global Forecast System (GFS). The GSI hybrid DA system showed significant improvement compared to GSI 3DVAR and became operational on May 22, 202 for GFS. It has also been extended to a 4DEnsVar hybrid ( Tangent linear and adjoint model free ) and showed further improvements. Efforts are being conducted to further develop and research GSI hybrid DA for operational regional forecast systems, e.g., Xu Lu poster on GSI hybrid for Hurricane-WRF (HWRF) Xuguang Wang Thur. talk on convective scale weather over CONUS 2 2

GSI-based hybrid ensemble-variational DA system member forecast member 2 forecast member k forecast EnKF Ensemble covariance EnKF analysis EnKF analysis 2 EnKF analysis k Re-center EnKF analysis ensemble to control analysis member analysis member 2 analysis member k analysis member forecast member 2 forecast member k forecast control forecast GSI control analysis control forecast data assimilation Wang, Parrish, Kleist, Whitaker, MWR, 203 First guess forecast 3

Various hybrid schemes Wang and Lei, MWR, 203 4

NCEP pre-implementation test of 3DEnsVar hybrid http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/wd20rt/experiments/prd2q3s/vsdb/ Significant improvement of operational GFS forecasts 5

GSI hybrid for GFS: GSI 3DVar vs. 3DEnsVar vs. EnKF Hybrid was better than 3DVar due to use of flow-dependent ensemble covariance Hybrid was better than EnKF due to the use of tangent linear normal mode balance constraint (TLNMC) Wang, Parrish, Kleist and Whitaker, MWR, 203 6

GSI-based 4DEnsVar hybrid: motivation Account for temporal evolution of error covariance that was ignored in 3DEnsVar hybrid. Still need to improve computational efficiency of traditional TL/ADJ 4DVAR being developed for GSI (Rancic et al. 202). An alternative to TL/ADJ 4DVar, i.e., 4D-Ensemble-Variational method (4DEnsVar) is therefore developed Conveniently avoid TL/ADJ of forecast model like earlier work and also applied localization inside variational minimization (e.g., Buehner et al. 200) 7

GSI-based 4DEnsVar hybrid: formulation Naturally extended from and unified with GSI-based 3DEnsVar hybrid formula (Wang 200, MWR), which uses extended control variables to incorporate ensemble like in Lorenc 2003, Buehner 2005, Wang et al., 2007, Wang et al. 2008) Add time dimension in 4DEnsVar ' J x, α J J J ' t x 2 ' T 2 B x x α (x ' k K k e static e k ) t o x ' 2 2 α T C α 2 T o T - o ( y t t '-H t y tx ) R t ( t '-Ht x t ) B stat 3DVAR static covariance; R observation error covariance; K ensemble size; C correlation matrix for ensemble covariance localization; x kth ensemble perturbation; ' ' o' x 3DVAR increment; x total (hybrid) increment; y innovation vector; H linearized observation operator; weighting coefficient for static covariance; weighting coefficient for ensemble covariance; α extended control variable. 2 e k 8

Experiment Design Time period: Aug. 5 200 Sep. 20 200; Model: GFS T90L64 Observations: all operational data Verification: global forecast and hurricane track forecasts. Experiment GSI3DVar 4DEnsVar 4DEnsVar-2hr 3DEnsVar 4DEnsVar-nbc Description The GSI 3DVar experiment 4D ensemble-variational DA experiment with hourly ensemble perturbations 4D ensemble-variational DA experiment with 2-hourly ensemble perturbations 3D ensemble-variational DA experiment Same as 4DEnsVar-2hr except without the use of the tangent linear normal mode balance constraint (TLNMC) 9

One obs. example for TC 3h increment propagated by model integration 4DEnsVar 3DEnsVar t=0 t=0 t=0 * -3h 0 3h time 0

Another example Temp. Height Downstream impact Upstream impact

Global forecasts verified against ECMWF analyses Forecasts from 3DEnsVar are more skillful than GSI3DVar. 4DEnsVar further improves the skill of the forecasts compared to 3DEnsVar. The improvement of 4DEnsVar relative to 3DEnsVar is smaller than the improvement of 3DEnsVar relative to GSI3DVar. 2

6-hour forecasts verified against conv. obs. 3DEnsVar and 4DEnsVar are more accurate than GSI3DVar at most levels. More appreciable improvement is seen in the wind than the temperature forecasts. Over NH and SH, 4DEnsVar shows consistent improvement relative to 3DEnsVar for wind forecasts and neutral or slightly positive impact for temperature forecast. K m/s Over TR, 4DEnsVar shows mostly neutral impact compared to 3DEnsVar for both wind and temperature forecasts (not 3 show).

96-hour forecasts verified against conv. obs. Temperature forecasts from 4DEnsVar show overall positive impact relative to 3DEnsVar for both NH and SH. 4DEnsVar shows neutral impact on wind forecasts over NH and positive impact over SH. Over TR, 4DEnsVar shows positive impact relative to 3DEnsVar only for wind forecasts at low level (not show) K m/s 4

Verification of hurricane track forecasts: cases 6 named storms in Atlantic and Pacific basins during 200 5

Verification of hurricane track forecasts: RMSE and percentage of better forecast 3DEnsVar outperforms GSI3DVar. 4DEnsVar are more accurate than 3DEnsVar after the 2- day forecast lead time. 6

Impact of number of time levels of ensemble perturbations and TLNMC Negative impact of less time levels of ensemble perturbations. Positive impact of TLNMC for global forecasts. 7

Impact of number of time levels of ensemble perturbations and TLNMC Negative impact of less time levels of ensemble perturbations Negative impact of TLNMC on TC track forecasts 8

Convergence rate and computational cost Slightly slower convergence for the first outer loop and slightly faster convergence for the second outer loop The cost of 4DEnsVar variational minimization is approximately.5 times of that of 3DEnsVar. 9

Summary and Discussion GSI based 4DEnsVar was developed and tested for NCEP GFS. 4DEnsVar further improved upon 3DEnsVar At short lead times, the improvement of 4DEnsVar relative to 3DEnsVar over NH was similar to that over SH. At longer forecast lead times, 4DEnsVar showed more improvement in SH than in NH. The improvement of 4DEnsVar over TR was neutral or slightly positive when forecasts were verified against the in-situ observations. The hurricane track forecasts initialized by 4DEnsVar were more accurate than 3DEnsVar after the 2-day forecast lead time. Temporal localization is being developed within GSI-based 4DEnsVar. Preliminary tests showed positive impact of the temporal localization. Further development of TLNMC. Tests of 4DEnsVar at dual resolution mode (Daryl Kleist) 20

Cited references Buehner, M., 2005: Ensemble-derived stationary and flow-dependent background-error covariances: evaluation in a quasi-operational NWP setting.quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,3,03-043. Buehner, M.,P. L. Houtekamer, C. Charette, H. L. Mitchell, and B. He, 200: Intercomparison of Variational Data Assimilation and the Ensemble Kalman Filter for Global Deterministic NWP. Part I: Description and Single-Observation Experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev.,38, 550-566. Lorenc, A. C. 2003: The potential of the ensemble Kalman filter for NWP a comparison with 4D-VAR. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,29, 383-3203. Wang, X., C. Snyder, and T. M. Hamill, 2007: On the theoretical equivalence of differently proposed ensemble/3d-var hybrid analysis schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 35, 222-227. Wang, X., D. Barker, C. Snyder, T. M. Hamill, 2008: A hybrid ETKF-3DVAR data assimilation scheme for the WRF model. Part I: observing system simulation experiment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 36, 56-53. Wang, X., 200: Incorporating ensemble covariance in the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI) variational minimization: a mathematical framework. Mon. Wea. Rev., 38,2990-2995. Wang, X., D. Parrish, D. Kleist and J. S. Whitaker, 203: GSI 3DVar-based Ensemble-Variational Hybrid Data Assimilation for NCEP Global Forecast System: Single Resolution Experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., in press. 2