Observation: we continue to observe large amounts of genetic variation in natural populations

Similar documents
Population Structure

Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution

Microevolution 2 mutation & migration

Solutions to Even-Numbered Exercises to accompany An Introduction to Population Genetics: Theory and Applications Rasmus Nielsen Montgomery Slatkin

19. Genetic Drift. The biological context. There are four basic consequences of genetic drift:

Processes of Evolution

Population Genetics. with implications for Linkage Disequilibrium. Chiara Sabatti, Human Genetics 6357a Gonda

Population Genetics 7: Genetic Drift

Enduring Understanding: Change in the genetic makeup of a population over time is evolution Pearson Education, Inc.

Lecture Notes: BIOL2007 Molecular Evolution

Genetical theory of natural selection

LECTURE # How does one test whether a population is in the HW equilibrium? (i) try the following example: Genotype Observed AA 50 Aa 0 aa 50

The neutral theory of molecular evolution

Classical Selection, Balancing Selection, and Neutral Mutations

A SIMPLE METHOD TO ACCOUNT FOR NATURAL SELECTION WHEN

D. Incorrect! That is what a phylogenetic tree intends to depict.

Febuary 1 st, 2010 Bioe 109 Winter 2010 Lecture 11 Molecular evolution. Classical vs. balanced views of genome structure

F SR = (H R H S)/H R. Frequency of A Frequency of a Population Population

Population Genetics I. Bio

Q1) Explain how background selection and genetic hitchhiking could explain the positive correlation between genetic diversity and recombination rate.

Chapter 6 Linkage Disequilibrium & Gene Mapping (Recombination)

Genetic Variation in Finite Populations

Life Cycles, Meiosis and Genetic Variability24/02/2015 2:26 PM

There are 3 parts to this exam. Use your time efficiently and be sure to put your name on the top of each page.

8. Genetic Diversity

Population Genetics: a tutorial

Question: If mating occurs at random in the population, what will the frequencies of A 1 and A 2 be in the next generation?

Breeding Values and Inbreeding. Breeding Values and Inbreeding

- point mutations in most non-coding DNA sites likely are likely neutral in their phenotypic effects.

Relatedness 1: IBD and coefficients of relatedness

Segregation versus mitotic recombination APPENDIX

Introduction to population genetics & evolution

THE EVOLUTION OF POPULATIONS THE EVOLUTION OF POPULATIONS

(Write your name on every page. One point will be deducted for every page without your name!)

Population genetics snippets for genepop

Understanding relationship between homologous sequences

Notes on Population Genetics

Wright-Fisher Models, Approximations, and Minimum Increments of Evolution

Lecture 13: Variation Among Populations and Gene Flow. Oct 2, 2006

Big Idea #1: The process of evolution drives the diversity and unity of life

Strong Selection is Necessary for Repeated Evolution of Blindness in Cavefish

Processes of Evolution

Evolution & Natural Selection

Inbreeding depression due to stabilizing selection on a quantitative character. Emmanuelle Porcher & Russell Lande

- mutations can occur at different levels from single nucleotide positions in DNA to entire genomes.

The Wright-Fisher Model and Genetic Drift

POPULATIONS. p t+1 = p t (1-u) + q t (v) p t+1 = p t (1-u) + (1-p t ) (v) Phenotypic Evolution: Process HOW DOES MUTATION CHANGE ALLELE FREQUENCIES?

Lecture 19. Long Term Selection: Topics Selection limits. Avoidance of inbreeding New Mutations

Molecular Evolution & the Origin of Variation

Molecular Evolution & the Origin of Variation

Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation

Study of similarities and differences in body plans of major groups Puzzling patterns:

CONGEN Population structure and evolutionary histories

Population Genetics & Evolution

Theory a well supported testable explanation of phenomenon occurring in the natural world.

URN MODELS: the Ewens Sampling Lemma

NATURAL SELECTION FOR WITHIN-GENERATION VARIANCE IN OFFSPRING NUMBER JOHN H. GILLESPIE. Manuscript received September 17, 1973 ABSTRACT

AEC 550 Conservation Genetics Lecture #2 Probability, Random mating, HW Expectations, & Genetic Diversity,

7. Tests for selection

Case-Control Association Testing. Case-Control Association Testing

Chapter 16. Table of Contents. Section 1 Genetic Equilibrium. Section 2 Disruption of Genetic Equilibrium. Section 3 Formation of Species

Name: Period Study Guide 17-1 and 17-2

Introduction to Natural Selection. Ryan Hernandez Tim O Connor

Genetics and Natural Selection

Problems for 3505 (2011)

Package popgen. R topics documented: February 25, Version 0.2. Date Title Population genetic simulations & numerical analysis

Darwinian Selection. Chapter 6 Natural Selection Basics 3/25/13. v evolution vs. natural selection? v evolution. v natural selection

Selection Page 1 sur 11. Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology SELECTION

Frequency Spectra and Inference in Population Genetics

Mathematical Biology. Sabin Lessard

Microevolution Changing Allele Frequencies

List the five conditions that can disturb genetic equilibrium in a population.(10)

Mathematical modelling of Population Genetics: Daniel Bichener

Notes for MCTP Week 2, 2014

GENETICS - CLUTCH CH.22 EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS.

Functional divergence 1: FFTNS and Shifting balance theory

1.A- Natural Selection

Introduction to Advanced Population Genetics

Evolution of Populations. Chapter 17

Module Contact: Dr Doug Yu, BIO Copyright of the University of East Anglia Version 1

Week 7.2 Ch 4 Microevolutionary Proceses

MUTATIONS that change the normal genetic system of

Affected Sibling Pairs. Biostatistics 666

Darwin s Observations & Conclusions The Struggle for Existence

Evolution PCB4674 Midterm exam2 Mar

Case Studies in Ecology and Evolution

I of a gene sampled from a randomly mating popdation,

Chapter 17: Population Genetics and Speciation

Perplexing Observations. Today: Thinking About Darwinian Evolution. We owe much of our understanding of EVOLUTION to CHARLES DARWIN.

Darwinian Selection. Chapter 7 Selection I 12/5/14. v evolution vs. natural selection? v evolution. v natural selection

1 Errors in mitosis and meiosis can result in chromosomal abnormalities.

Gene Genealogies Coalescence Theory. Annabelle Haudry Glasgow, July 2009

Demography April 10, 2015

EVOLUTION. HISTORY: Ideas that shaped the current evolutionary theory. Evolution change in populations over time.

CHAPTER 23 THE EVOLUTIONS OF POPULATIONS. Section C: Genetic Variation, the Substrate for Natural Selection

NEUTRAL EVOLUTION IN ONE- AND TWO-LOCUS SYSTEMS

SEQUENCE DIVERGENCE,FUNCTIONAL CONSTRAINT, AND SELECTION IN PROTEIN EVOLUTION

MATHEMATICAL MODELS - Vol. III - Mathematical Modeling and the Human Genome - Hilary S. Booth MATHEMATICAL MODELING AND THE HUMAN GENOME

A Primer of Population Genetics

Population Genetics of Selection

Transcription:

MUTATION AND GENETIC VARIATION Observation: we continue to observe large amounts of genetic variation in natural populations Problem: How does this variation arise and how is it maintained. Here, we look at whether mutation alone can explain this variation.

RECURRENT MUTATION MODEL A simple model to look at the effect of mutation on gene frequencies - examine an ideal population in which all the HWE assumptions hold except that mutations occur µ A1 A2 ν µ = forward mutation rate/generation ν = reverse mutation rate/generation

µ ~ 10-5 to 10-8 ν ~ 10-6 to 10-9 mutations/ gene.

p 0 and q 0 - initial gene frequencies of the A1 and A2 alleles. under recurrent mutation model, each generation the frequency of A2 increases by p 0 µ and decreases by q 0 ν. After one generation q 1 = q 0 + p 0 µ - q 0 ν The change in gene frequency Δq = p 0 µ - q 0 ν

Each generation, the change in allele frequency is negligible over the long term, an equilibrium is achieved - loss of A2 alleles is balanced by the gain. At equilbrium, Δq = <p>µ - <q>ν = 0 where <p> and <q> are equilibrium allele frequencies.

Substituting <p> = 1 - <q> <q> = µ/(µ + ν) <p> = ν/(µ + ν) - equilibrium allele frequencies are independent of original gene frequencies - dependent only on mutation rates. -time to equilibrium, however, is dependent on initial allele frequencies

INFINTE ALLELES MODEL This mutation model is particularly useful in considering DNA sequences. Consider a gene 900 bps in length. -each nucleotide site can have one of four states - total number of possible alleles for this gene is 4 900 or 10 542. This is the basis of the IAM - each mutation occurs independent of site, and so an infinite number of alleles are possible.

In the IAM -two alleles that are identical by state must also be identical by descent -thus, homozygous genotypes must be autozygous -to measure homozygosity, we need to measure autozygosity. Consider the genotype A i A i. -two alleles are IBD if neither allele has mutated in the course of one generation. - mutation rate is µ, then Pr(IBD) = (1 µ)(1 µ) = (1 µ) 2

- remember that the inbreeding coefficient is the probability that a genotype is autozygous (and hence homozygous) -in an ideal population. F t = 1/2N + (1-1/2N)F t-1 -in a population under mutation pressure, probability that two alleles are IBD is dependent on mutation rate µ. Thus F t = (1/2N) (1 µ) 2 + (1-1/2N)(1 µ) 2 F t-1

Thus, every generation random genetic drift (and inbreeding) increases autozygosity but mutations decrease autozygosity. - equilibrium is reached such that <F> = 1/(1 + 4Nµ) and the equilbrium heterozygosity <H> <H> = 1 - <F> = 4Nµ /(1 + 4Nµ)

The parameter 4Nµ (or more commonly 4N e µ) occurs often in population genetics and is referred to as Θ.

maintenace of genetic variation: mutation-drift balance and neutral theory of evolution - proposed in the 1960s to explain large amount of genetic variation observed in natural populations. -neutral theory has the following assumptions: (1) primary selective force is purifying selection (2) most alleles observed are selectively neutral - one allele is not favored over another (3) variation we observe in populations arises from balance between mutation and random genetic drift

The neutral theory (or mutation-drift balance) provides a powerful null hypothesis in evolutionary genetics.

FIXATION PROBABILITY - the probability for fixation of a neutral allele. - consider two alleles A1 and A2 -probability that allele A2 will be fixed is dependent on its initial frequency its selective advantage or disadvantage (s) the effective population size (N e )

Genotypes A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 relative fitness 1 1 + s 1 + 2s Under additive selection model, Kimura(1962) showed that probability of fixation of allele A2 over time is P = (1 - e -4Nsq )/(1 - e -4Ns ) where q is the initial frequency of A2.

Fixation Probability under Neutrality Note: since e -x ~ 1 -x when x 0 When Ns 0, then P = 4Nsq/4Ns P = q The condition Ns 0 is called neutral limit (when selection is weak), or s << 1/N. -probability of fixation is dependent only on initial frequency of the allele.

- population of size N composed solely of A1 alleles. - A2 allele arises through a mutational event. - population of size N (with 2N alleles) there is now 1 A2 allele. q = 1/2N P = (1 - e -4Ns/2N )(1 - e -4Ns ) Under neutrality, Ns 0 P = (4Ns/2N)/4Ns P = 1/2N

Fixation Probability under Selection - under selection. if q = 1/2N P = (1 - e -4Nsq )/(1 - e -4Ns ) P = (1 - e -2s )/(1 - e -4Ns ) If absolute value of s 0 and N is very large P = 2s Under selection, the fixation probability is dependent on magnitude of selection.

RATES OF FIXATION rate at which a new neutral mutation is fixed in population is equal to neutral mutation rate. K = rate of fixation of alleles K = µ = (rate of allele formation)(fixation probability) = (2N gametes)(µ mutation rate/gamete)(1/2n)

Under selection, K = (2N)(µ)(2s) = 4Nµs Thus, under selection ( Ns > 1) the rate of gene substitution is greater than under neutrality. - under neutrality, since rate of gene substitution is equal to µ, the average time between consecutive fixations is 1/µ. -higher the mutation rate, the smaller time between fixations

TIME TO FIXATION How long does it take for a neutral mutation to be fixed? Kimura showed that the mean time to fixation under neutrality is Under selection <t> = 4Ne generations <t> = (2/s)ln(2Ne)

Thus, if N = 10 6 and generation time is 2 years -under neutrality <t> = 8 million years -with selected mutations, if s = 0.01 <t> = 5800 years

HETEROZYGOSITY UNDER NEUTRALITY The heterozygosity H of neutral mutations is given under the infinite alleles model <H> = 4N e /(1 + 4N e µ) = Θ/(1 + Θ)