Module 4. Stationary Time Series Models Part 1 MA Models and Their Properties

Similar documents
We use the centered realization z t z in the computation. Also used in computing sample autocovariances and autocorrelations.

Module 3. Descriptive Time Series Statistics and Introduction to Time Series Models

FE570 Financial Markets and Trading. Stevens Institute of Technology

TMA4285 December 2015 Time series models, solution.

ARMA (and ARIMA) models are often expressed in backshift notation.

Econometría 2: Análisis de series de Tiempo

7. Forecasting with ARIMA models

Notes on the Book: Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control by George E. P. Box and Gwilym M. Jenkins

6 NONSEASONAL BOX-JENKINS MODELS

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41914, Spring Quarter 2017, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Midterm

Circle the single best answer for each multiple choice question. Your choice should be made clearly.

{ } Stochastic processes. Models for time series. Specification of a process. Specification of a process. , X t3. ,...X tn }

3 Theory of stationary random processes

We will only present the general ideas on how to obtain. follow closely the AR(1) and AR(2) cases presented before.

TMA4285 Time Series Models Exam December

Circle a single answer for each multiple choice question. Your choice should be made clearly.

Lecture 3: Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) Models and their Practical Applications

Some Time-Series Models

Exercises - Time series analysis

CHAPTER 8 FORECASTING PRACTICE I

Identifiability, Invertibility

ECON/FIN 250: Forecasting in Finance and Economics: Section 6: Standard Univariate Models

3. ARMA Modeling. Now: Important class of stationary processes

γ 0 = Var(X i ) = Var(φ 1 X i 1 +W i ) = φ 2 1γ 0 +σ 2, which implies that we must have φ 1 < 1, and γ 0 = σ2 . 1 φ 2 1 We may also calculate for j 1

STAT 443 Final Exam Review. 1 Basic Definitions. 2 Statistical Tests. L A TEXer: W. Kong

at least 50 and preferably 100 observations should be available to build a proper model

Time Series Analysis

Chapter 6: Model Specification for Time Series

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41914, Spring Quarter 2017, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Midterm

Empirical Market Microstructure Analysis (EMMA)

Lesson 9: Autoregressive-Moving Average (ARMA) models

Discrete time processes

1 Linear Difference Equations

18.S096 Problem Set 4 Fall 2013 Time Series Due Date: 10/15/2013

Examination paper for Solution: TMA4285 Time series models

Univariate Time Series Analysis; ARIMA Models

EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN UNIVERSITY ECON 604, FALL 2007 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS MEHMET BALCILAR ARIMA MODELS: IDENTIFICATION

Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) Models and their Practical Applications

MAT 3379 (Winter 2016) FINAL EXAM (SOLUTIONS)

Difference equations. Definitions: A difference equation takes the general form. x t f x t 1,,x t m.

Covariances of ARMA Processes

MULTIVARIATE TIME SERIES ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES. Version without figures. 9 August 2018

Time Series 3. Robert Almgren. Sept. 28, 2009

University of Oxford. Statistical Methods Autocorrelation. Identification and Estimation

Stat 5100 Handout #12.e Notes: ARIMA Models (Unit 7) Key here: after stationary, identify dependence structure (and use for forecasting)

Chapter 4: Models for Stationary Time Series

Covariance Stationary Time Series. Example: Independent White Noise (IWN(0,σ 2 )) Y t = ε t, ε t iid N(0,σ 2 )

Chapter 12: An introduction to Time Series Analysis. Chapter 12: An introduction to Time Series Analysis

ESSE Mid-Term Test 2017 Tuesday 17 October :30-09:45

Time Series I Time Domain Methods

Ch 4. Models For Stationary Time Series. Time Series Analysis

Introduction to Time Series Analysis. Lecture 11.

Ross Bettinger, Analytical Consultant, Seattle, WA

Part III Example Sheet 1 - Solutions YC/Lent 2015 Comments and corrections should be ed to

Time Series Analysis

Ch. 14 Stationary ARMA Process

6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes

Cointegrated VARIMA models: specification and. simulation

Midterm Suggested Solutions

Stochastic Modelling Solutions to Exercises on Time Series

MCMC analysis of classical time series algorithms.

Lecture 2: Univariate Time Series

Lesson 2: Analysis of time series

Forecasting. This optimal forecast is referred to as the Minimum Mean Square Error Forecast. This optimal forecast is unbiased because

STAT Financial Time Series

Basic concepts and terminology: AR, MA and ARMA processes

Econometrics II Heij et al. Chapter 7.1

STAD57 Time Series Analysis. Lecture 8

APPLIED ECONOMETRIC TIME SERIES 4TH EDITION

Advanced Econometrics

LINEAR STOCHASTIC MODELS

Applied time-series analysis

ARIMA Models. Jamie Monogan. January 16, University of Georgia. Jamie Monogan (UGA) ARIMA Models January 16, / 27

Time Series 2. Robert Almgren. Sept. 21, 2009

Next tool is Partial ACF; mathematical tools first. The Multivariate Normal Distribution. e z2 /2. f Z (z) = 1 2π. e z2 i /2

Lecture 1: Fundamental concepts in Time Series Analysis (part 2)

ARMA models with time-varying coefficients. Periodic case.

An introduction to volatility models with indices

Time Series Examples Sheet

Nonlinear time series

Permanent Income Hypothesis (PIH) Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko

Reliability and Risk Analysis. Time Series, Types of Trend Functions and Estimates of Trends

Econ 623 Econometrics II Topic 2: Stationary Time Series

Forecasting with ARMA

Time Series Outlier Detection

Introduction to ARMA and GARCH processes

FORECASTING SUGARCANE PRODUCTION IN INDIA WITH ARIMA MODEL

UNIVARIATE TIME SERIES ANALYSIS BRIEFING 1970

STAT 443 (Winter ) Forecasting

Lecture 3-4: Probability models for time series

2. An Introduction to Moving Average Models and ARMA Models

Stationary Stochastic Time Series Models

Università di Pavia. Forecasting. Eduardo Rossi

Time Series Analysis. Solutions to problems in Chapter 5 IMM

Ch 6. Model Specification. Time Series Analysis

A time series is called strictly stationary if the joint distribution of every collection (Y t

Time Series Examples Sheet

Levinson Durbin Recursions: I

Lesson 13: Box-Jenkins Modeling Strategy for building ARMA models

Levinson Durbin Recursions: I

Transcription:

Module 4 Stationary Time Series Models Part 1 MA Models and Their Properties Class notes for Statistics 451: Applied Time Series Iowa State University Copyright 2015 W. Q. Meeker. February 14, 2016 20h 58min 4-1

Module 4 Segment 1 ARMA Notation, Conventions, Expectations, and other Preliminaries 4-2

Deviations from the Sample Mean The sample mean is computed as µ = z = nt=1 z t n We use the centered realization z t z in the computation of many statistics. For example σ Z = γ 0 = S Z = nt=1 (z t z) 2 n 1 Also used in computing sample autocovariances and autocorrelations. Subtracting out the mean ( z) does not change the sample variance ( γ 0 ), sample autocovariances ( γ k ), or sample autocorrelations ( ρ k ) of a realization. 4-3

Change in Business Inventories 1955-1969 and Centered Change in Business Inventories 1955-1969 Change in Inventories Billions of Dollars -5 0 5 10 1955 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 Year Centered Change in Inventories Billions of Dollars -10 0 5 10 1955 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 Year 4-4

Deviations from the Process Mean The stochastic process is Z 1,Z 2,... The process mean is µ = E(Z t ). Some derivations are simplified by using Ż t = Z t µ to compute model properties (only the mean has changed). In particular, Similarly, E(Ż t ) = E(Z t µ) = E(Z t ) E(µ) = µ µ = 0 γ 0 = Var(Ż t ) = Var(Z t µ) = Var(Z t )+Var(µ) = Var(Z t ) = σ 2 Z and γ k = Cov(Ż t,ż t+k ) = Cov(Z t µ,z t+k µ) = Cov(Z t,z t+k ) ρ k = γ k /γ 0 4-5

Backshift Operator Notation Backshift operators: BZ t = Z t 1 B 2 Z t = BBZ t = BZ t 1 = Z t 2 B 3 Z t = Z t 3, etc. If C is a constant, then BC = C Differencing operators: (1 B)Z t = Z t BZ t = Z t Z t 1 (1 B) 2 Z t = (1 2B+B 2 )Z t = Z t 2Z t 1 +Z t 2 Seasonal differencing operators: (1 B 4 )Z t = Z t B 4 Z t = Z t Z t 4 (1 B 12 )Z t = Z t B 12 Z t = Z t Z t 12 4-6

Polynomial Operator Notation φ(b) = φ p (B) (1 φ 1 B φ 2 B 2 φ p B p ) is useful for expressing the AR(p) model. For example, with p = 2, an AR(2) model. or Other polynomial operators: φ 2 (B)Ż t = a t (1 φ 1 B φ 2 B 2 )Ż t = a t Ż t φ 1 Ż t 1 φ 2 Ż t 2 = a t Ż t = φ 1 Ż t 1 +φ 2 Ż t 2 +a t θ(b) = θ q (B) (1 θ 1 B θ 2 B 2 θ q B q ) [as in Ż t = θ q (B)a t ] ψ(b) = ψ (B) (1+ψ 1 B+ψ 2 B 2 + ) [as in Ż t = ψ(b)a t ] π(b) = π (B) (1 π 1 B π 2 B 2 ) [as in π(b)ż t = a t ] 4-7

General ARMA(p,q) Model in Terms of Ż t Ż t Z t µ φ p (B)Ż t = θ q (B)a t (1 φ 1 B φ 2 B 2 φ p B p )Ż t = (1 θ 1 B θ 2 B 2 θ q B q )a t Ż t φ 1 Ż t 1 φ 2 Ż t 2 φ p Ż t p = a t θ 1 a t 1 θ 2 a t 2 θ q a t q or Ż t = φ 1 Ż t 1 +φ 2 Ż t 2 + +φ p Ż t p θ 1 a t 1 θ 2 a t 2 θ q a t q +a t 4-8

Mean (µ) and Constant Term (θ 0 ) for an ARMA(2,2) Model Replace Ż t with Ż t = Z t µ and solve for Z t =. For example, using p = 2 and q = 2, giving an ARMA(2,2) model: and Ż t = φ 1 Ż t 1 +φ 2 Ż t 2 θ 1 a t 1 θ 2 a t 2 +a t Z t µ = φ 1 (Z t 1 µ)+φ 2 (Z t 2 µ) θ 1 a t 1 θ 2 a t 2 +a t Z t = µ φ 1 µ φ 2 µ+φ 1 Z t 1 +φ 2 Z t 2 θ 1 a t 1 θ 2 a t 2 +a t Z t = θ 0 +φ 1 Z t 1 +φ 2 Z t 2 θ 1 a t 1 θ 2 a t 2 +a t where θ 0 = µ φ 1 µ φ 2 µ = µ(1 φ 1 φ 2 ) is the ARMA model constant term. Also, E(Z t ) = µ = θ 0 /(1 φ 1 φ 2 ). Note that E(Z t ) = µ = θ 0 for an MA(q) model. 4-9

Module 4 Segment 2 Properties of the MA(1) Model and the PACF 4-10

Simulated MA(1) Data with θ 1 = 0.9,σ a = 1 plot(arima.sim(n=250, model=list(ma=0.90)), ylab= ) 4 2 0 2 0 50 100 150 200 250 Time 4-11

Simulated MA(1) Data with θ 1 = 0.9,σ a = 1 plot(arima.sim(n=250, model=list(ma=-0.90)), ylab= ) 4 2 0 2 4 0 50 100 150 200 250 Time 4-12

Mean and Variance of the MA(1) Model Model: Z t = θ 0 θ 1 a t 1 +a t, a t nid(0,σ 2 a) Mean: µ Z E(Z t ) = E(θ 0 θ 1 a t 1 +a t ) = θ 0 +0+0 = θ 0. Variance: γ 0 σz 2 t Var(Z t ) E[(Z t µ Z ) 2 ] = E(Żt 2) γ 0 = E(Żt 2) = E[( θ 1 a t 1 +a t ) 2 ] = E[(θ1 2a2 t 1 2θ 1 a t 1 a t + a 2 t )] = θ1 2E(a2 t 1 ) 2θ 1E(a t 1 a t ) + E(a 2 t ) = θ1 2σ2 a 0 + σa 2 = (θ1 2 +1)σ2 a 4-13

Autocovariance and Autocorrelation Functions for the MA(1) Model Autocovariance: γ k Cov(Z t,z t+k ) = E[(Z t µ Z )(Z t+k µ Z )] = E(Ż t Ż t+k ) γ 1 E(Ż t Ż t+1 ) = E[( θ 1 a t 1 +a t )( θ 1 a t +a t+1 )] = E(θ 2 1 a t 1a t θ 1 a t 1 a t+1 θ 1 a 2 t + a t a t+1 ) = 0 0 θ 1 σ 2 a + 0 = θ 1 σ 2 a Thus ρ 1 = γ 1 γ 0 = θ 1 (1+θ 2 1 ). Using similar operations, it is easy to show that γ 2 E(Ż t Ż t+2 ) = 0 and thus ρ 2 = γ 2 /γ 0 = 0. In general, for MA(1), ρ k = γ k /γ 0 = 0 for k > 1. 4-14

Partial Autocorrelation Function For any model, the process PACF φ kk can be computed from the process ACF from ρ 1,ρ 2,... using the recursive formula from Durbin (1960): where φ 1,1 = ρ 1 φ kk = ρ k 1 k 1 j=1 k 1 j=1 φ k 1, j ρ k j φ k 1, j ρ j, k = 2,3,... φ kj = φ k 1,j φ kk φ k 1,k j (k = 3,4,...; j = 1,2,...,k 1) This formula is based on the solution of the Yule-Walker equations (covered later). Also, the sample PACF can be computed from the sample ACF. That is, φ kk is a function of ρ 1, ρ 2,... 4-15

Hints For Using Durbin s formula φ 11 = ρ 1 depends on ρ 1 φ 22 = ρ 2 φ 11 ρ 1 1 φ 11 ρ 1 depends on ρ 1,ρ 2 and φ 11 φ 33 depends on ρ 1,ρ 2,ρ 3,φ 21, and φ 22 φ 44 depends on ρ 1,ρ 2,ρ 3,ρ 4,φ 31,φ 32, and φ 33 φ 55 depends on ρ 1,ρ 2,ρ 3,ρ 4,ρ 5,φ 41,φ 42,φ 43, and φ 44 and so on. 4-16

True ACF and PACF for MA(1) Model with θ 1 = 0.95 True ACF ma: 0.95 True ACF -1.0 0.0 1.0 True PACF ma: 0.95 True PACF -1.0 0.0 1.0 4-17

True ACF and PACF for MA(1) Model with θ 1 = 0.95 True ACF ma: -0.95 True ACF -1.0 0.0 1.0 True PACF ma: -0.95 True PACF -1.0 0.0 1.0 4-18

Simulated Realization (MA(1),θ 1 = 0.95,n = 75) Graphical Output from Function iden Simulated data w= Data Range-Mean Plot w -3-2 -1 0 1 2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 time ACF Range 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 ACF Partial ACF -1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0-1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 PACF -0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2 0.0 0.2 Mean 4-19

Simulated Realization (MA(1),θ 1 = 0.95,n = 300) Graphical Output from Function iden Simulated data w= Data Range-Mean Plot w -2 0 2 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 time ACF Range 3 4 5 6 ACF Partial ACF -1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0-1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 PACF -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 Mean 4-20

Simulated Realization (MA(1),θ 1 = 0.95,n = 75) Graphical Output from Function iden Simulated data w= Data Range-Mean Plot w -2 0 2 4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 time ACF Range 1 2 3 4 5 6 ACF Partial ACF -1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0-1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 PACF -0.6-0.4-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Mean 4-21

Simulated Realization (MA(1),θ 1 = 0.95,n = 300) Graphical Output from Function iden Simulated data w= Data Range-Mean Plot w -4-2 0 2 4 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 time ACF Range 2 3 4 5 6 ACF Partial ACF -1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0-1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 PACF -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 Mean 4-22

Module 4 Segment 3 Inverting the MA(1) Model and MA(q) Properties 4-23

Geometric Power Series 1 (1 θ 1 B) = (1 θ 1B) 1 = (1+θ 1 B+θ 2 1 B2 + ) This expansion provides a convenient method for re-expressing parts of some ARMA models. When θ 1 < 1 the series converges. Similarly, 1 (1 φ 1 B) =(1 φ 1B) 1 = (1+φ 1 B+φ 2 1 B2 + ) Again, when φ 1 < 1 the series converges. 4-24

Using the Geometric Power Series to Re-express the MA(1) Model as an Infinite AR Ż t = (1 θ 1 B)a t a t = (1 θ 1 B) 1 Ż t a t = (1+θ 1 B+θ1 2 B2 + )Ż t Ż t = θ 1 Ż t 1 θ1żt 2 2 +a t Thus the MA(1) can be expressed as an infinite AR model. If 1 < θ 1 < 1, then the weight on the old observations is decreasing with age (having more practical meaning). This is the condition of invertibility for an MA(1) model. 4-25

Using the Back-substitution to Re-express the MA(1) Model as an Infinite AR Ż t = θ 1 a t 1 +a t a t 1 = Ż t 1 +θ 1 a t 2 a t 2 = Ż t 2 +θ 1 a t 3 a t 3 = Ż t 3 +θ 1 a t 4 Substituting, successively, a t 1,a t 2,a t 3..., shows that Ż t = θ 1 Ż t 1 θ 2 1Żt 2 +a t This method works, more generally, for higher-order MA(q) models, but the algebra is tedious. 4-26

Notes on the MA(1) Model Given ρ 1 = γ 1 γ = θ 1 0 (1+θ1 2 we can see ) 0.5 ρ 1 0.5 Solving the ρ 1 = quadratic equation for θ 1 gives 1 θ 1 = 2ρ ± 1 1 (2ρ 1 ) 2 1 ρ 1 0 0 ρ 1 = 0 The two solutions are related by θ 1 = 1 θ 1 For any 0.5 ρ 1 0.5, the solution with 1 < θ 1 < 1 is the invertible parameter value. Substituting ρ 1 for ρ 1 provides an estimator for θ 1. 4-27

Mean, Variance, and Covariance of the MA(q) Model Model: Z t = θ 0 +θ q (B)a t = θ 0 θ 1 a t 1 θ q a t q +a t Mean: µ Z E(Z t ) = E(θ 0 θ 1 a t 1 θ q a t q +a t ) = θ 0. Variance: γ 0 Var(Z t ) E[(Z t µ Z ) 2 ] = E(Ż 2 ) Centered MA(q): Ż t = θ q (B)a t = θ 1 a t 1 θ q a t q +a t Var(Z t ) γ 0 = E(Ż 2 t ) = (1+θ 2 1 + +θ2 q)σ 2 a Cov(Z t,z t+k ) = γ k = E(Ż t Ż t+k ) = ρ k = γ k γ 0 4-28

Re-expressing the MA(q) Model as an Infinite AR More generally, any MA(q) model can be expressed as Ż t = θ q (B)a t = (1 θ 1 B θ 2 B 2 θ q B)a t 1 θ q (B)Żt = π(b)ż t = (1 π 1 B π 2 B 2...)Ż t = a t Ż t = π 1 Ż t 1 +π 2 Ż t 2 + +a t = k=1 π k Ż t k +a t Values of π 1,π 2,... depend on θ 1,...,θ q. For the model to have practical meaning, the π j values should not remain large as j gets large. Formally, the invertibility condition is met if i=1 π j < Invertibility of an MA(q) model can be checked by finding the roots of the polynomial θ q (B) (1 θ 1 B θ 2 B 2 θ q B q ) = 0. All q roots must lie outside of the unit-circle. 4-29

Module 4 Segment 4 Checking Invertibility and Polynomial Roots 4-30

Checking the Invertibility of an MA(2) Model Invertibility of an MA(2) model can be checked by finding the roots of the polynomial θ 2 (B) = (1 θ 1 B θ 2 B 2 ) = 0. Both roots must lie outside of the unit-circle. Roots have the form B = θ 1 ± θ 2 1 +4θ 2 2θ 2 z = x+iy where i = 1. A root is outside of the unit circle if z = x 2 +y 2 > 1 This method works for any q, but for q > 2 it is best to use numerical methods to find the q roots. 4-31

Roots of (1 1.5B 0.4B 2 ) = 0 arma.root(c(1.5, 0.4)) Polynomial Function versus B Coefficients= 1.5, 0.4 Roots and the Unit Circle Function -20-15 -10-5 0 Imaginary Part -4-2 0 2 4-8 -6-4 -2 0 B -4-2 0 2 4 Real Part 4-32

Roots of the Quadratic (1 0.5B+0.9B 2 ) = 0 and the Unit Circle Unit Circle Coefficients= 0.5, 0.9 Imaginary Part 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Real Part 4-33

Roots of (1 0.5B+0.9B 2 ) = 0 arma.root(c(0.5, 0.9)) Polynomial Function versus B Coefficients= 0.5, -0.9 Roots and the Unit Circle Function 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 Imaginary Part -1.5-0.5 0.5 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6-1.5-0.5 0.5 1.5 B Real Part 4-34

Roots of (1 0.5B+0.9B 2 0.1B 3 0.5B 4 ) = 0 arma.root(c(0.5, 0.9, 0.1, 0.5)) Polynomial Function versus B Coefficients= 0.5, -0.9, 0.1, 0.5 Roots and the Unit Circle Function -100-80 -60-40 -20 0 Imaginary Part -1 0 1-4 -2 0 2 B -1 0 1 Real Part 4-35

Checking the Invertibility of an MA(2) Model Simple Rule Both roots lying outside of the unit-circle implies θ 2 +θ 1 < 1 θ 2 < 1 θ 1 θ 2 θ 1 < 1 θ 2 < 1+θ 1 1 < θ 2 < 1 1 < θ 2 < 1 and the inequalities define the MA(2) triangle. 4-36

Module 4 Segment 5 MA(2) Model Properties 4-37

Autocovariance and Autocorrelation Functions for the MA(2) Model γ 1 Cov(Z t,z t+1 ) = E[(Z t µ Z )(Z t+1 µ Z )] = E(Ż t Ż t+1 ) Thus = E[( θ 1 a t 1 θ 2 a t 2 +a t )( θ 1 a t θ 2 a t 1 +a t+1 )] = E(θ 1 θ 2 a 2 t 1 θ 1a 2 t)+0+0+0+0+0+0+0 = θ 1 θ 2 E(a 2 t 1 ) θ 1E(a 2 t) = (θ 1 θ 2 θ 1 )σ 2 a ρ 1 = γ 1 = θ 1θ 2 θ 1 γ 0 1+θ1 2. +θ2 2 Using similar operations, it is easy to show that ρ 2 = γ 2 θ = 2 γ 0 1+θ1 2 +θ2 2 and that, in general, for MA(2), ρ k = γ k /γ 0 = 0 for k > 2. 4-38

True ACF and PACF for MA(2) Model with θ 1 = 0.78,θ 2 = 0.2 True ACF ma: 0.78, 0.2 True ACF -1.0 0.0 1.0 True PACF ma: 0.78, 0.2 True PACF -1.0 0.0 1.0 4-39

True ACF and PACF for MA(2) Model with θ 1 = 1,θ 2 = 0.95 True ACF ma: 1, -0.95 True ACF -1.0 0.0 1.0 True PACF ma: 1, -0.95 True PACF -1.0 0.0 1.0 4-40

Simulated Realization (MA(2),θ 1 = 0.78,θ 2 = 0.2,n = 75) Graphical Output from Function iden Simulated data w= Data Range-Mean Plot w -3-2 -1 0 1 2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 time ACF Range 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 ACF Partial ACF -1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0-1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 PACF -0.04-0.02 0.0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 Mean 4-41

Simulated Realization (MA(2),θ 1 = 0.78,θ 2 = 0.2,n = 300) Graphical Output from Function iden Simulated data w= Data Range-Mean Plot w -2 0 2 4 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 time ACF Range 3 4 5 6 7 ACF Partial ACF -1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0-1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 PACF -0.2-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 Mean 4-42

Simulated Realization (MA(2),θ 1 = 1,θ 2 = 0.95,n = 75) Graphical Output from Function iden Simulated data w= Data Range-Mean Plot w -2 0 2 4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 time ACF Range 4 5 6 7 ACF Partial ACF -1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0-1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 PACF -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 Mean 4-43

Simulated Realization (MA(2),θ 1 = 1,θ 2 = 0.95,n = 300) Graphical Output from Function iden Simulated data w= Data Range-Mean Plot w -6-4 -2 0 2 4 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 time ACF Range 4 6 8 10 ACF Partial ACF -1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0-1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 PACF -0.6-0.4-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Mean 4-44

MA(2) Triangle Relating ρ 1 and ρ 2 to θ 1 and θ 2 4-45

MA(2) Triangle Showing ACF and PACF Functions 4-46