JWKB QUANTIZATION CONDITION. exp ± i x. wiggly-variable k(x) Logical Structure of pages 6-11 to 6-14 (not covered in lecture):

Similar documents
Last time: Normalization of eigenfunctions which belong to continuously variable eigenvalues. often needed - alternate method via JWKB next lecture

Physics 443, Solutions to PS 4

Lecture 12: Particle in 1D boxes & Simple Harmonic Oscillator

MATH 225: Foundations of Higher Matheamatics. Dr. Morton. 3.4: Proof by Cases

Physics 505 Homework No. 3 Solutions S3-1

Polynomial Degree and Finite Differences

UNIT 5 QUADRATIC FUNCTIONS Lesson 2: Creating and Solving Quadratic Equations in One Variable Instruction

6. Qualitative Solutions of the TISE

MATH 131P: PRACTICE FINAL SOLUTIONS DECEMBER 12, 2012

Page 404. Lecture 22: Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Energy Basis Date Given: 2008/11/19 Date Revised: 2008/11/19

EE201/MSE207 Lecture 10 Angular momentum

Section 8.5. z(t) = be ix(t). (8.5.1) Figure A pendulum. ż = ibẋe ix (8.5.2) (8.5.3) = ( bẋ 2 cos(x) bẍ sin(x)) + i( bẋ 2 sin(x) + bẍ cos(x)).

The WKBJ Wavefunctions in the Classically Forbbiden Region: the Connection Formulae

Lecture 12: Particle in 1D boxes, Simple Harmonic Oscillators

Lecture 10: The Schrödinger Equation. Lecture 10, p 2

Lecture 10: The Schrödinger Equation. Lecture 10, p 2

Today: Particle-in-a-Box wavefunctions

Chapter 7. Bound Systems are perhaps the most interesting cases for us to consider. We see much of the interesting features of quantum mechanics.

Probability and Normalization

Connection Formulae. The WKB approximation falls apart near a turning point. Then E V 0 so 1

Harmonic Oscillator Eigenvalues and Eigenfunctions

The Schrödinger Equation in One Dimension

Chapter 4 (Lecture 6-7) Schrodinger equation for some simple systems Table: List of various one dimensional potentials System Physical correspondence

Lecture-XXVI. Time-Independent Schrodinger Equation

PHYS Concept Tests Fall 2009

Continuum Normalization. good for cooking or inspecting wiggly functions and for crudely evaluating integrals of wiggly integrands.

Math 216 Second Midterm 28 March, 2013

When two letters name a vector, the first indicates the and the second indicates the of the vector.

Lecture 5: Harmonic oscillator, Morse Oscillator, 1D Rigid Rotor

One-Dimensional Wave Propagation (without distortion or attenuation)

2m dx 2. The particle in a one dimensional box (of size L) energy levels are

A Propagating Wave Packet The Group Velocity

Total energy in volume

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (Prelude to Nuclear Shell Model) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle In the microscopic world,

Electron in a Box. A wave packet in a square well (an electron in a box) changing with time.

A. Time dependence from separation of timescales

8.04 Spring 2013 March 12, 2013 Problem 1. (10 points) The Probability Current

Section 2.1: Reduce Rational Expressions

Brief review of Quantum Mechanics (QM)

Chapter. 5 Bound States: Simple Case

MATH325 - QUANTUM MECHANICS - SOLUTION SHEET 11

Physics 342 Lecture 17. Midterm I Recap. Lecture 17. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I

Robot Position from Wheel Odometry

Lecture #4: The Classical Wave Equation and Separation of Variables

T 1 (p) T 3 (p) 2 (p) + T

Stability Domain of a Linear Differential Equation with Two Delays

Section 5.1 Extra Practice. Section 5.2 Extra Practice. Chapter 5 Review. cos x. 9. Determine the amplitude & period for the graphs below.

Exact Free Vibration of Webs Moving Axially at High Speed

Harmonic Oscillator I

Physics 43 Chapter 41 Homework #11 Key

A Propagating Wave Packet The Group Velocity

Computer Problems for Taylor Series and Series Convergence

A.P. Calculus Summer Assignment

Lecture 4b. Bessel functions. Introduction. Generalized factorial function. 4b.1. Using integration by parts it is easy to show that

The Particle in a Box

Physics 342 Lecture 23. Radial Separation. Lecture 23. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I

3.14. The model of Haldane on a honeycomb lattice

PHY4604 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 2004 Final Exam SOLUTIONS December 17, 2004, 7:30 a.m.- 9:30 a.m.

Investigating a pendulum

Nonlinear Oscillations and Chaos

ECE 487 Lecture 5 : Foundations of Quantum Mechanics IV Class Outline:

Answers to Coursebook questions Chapter 5.6

A732: Exercise #7 Maximum Likelihood

Appendix A. The Particle in a Box: A Demonstration of Quantum Mechanical Principles for a Simple, One-Dimensional, One-Electron Model System

For a semi-circle with radius r, its circumfrence is πr, so the radian measure of a semi-circle (a straight line) is

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2016 Assignment 3

Lecture 2: simple QM problems

HW WKB harmonic oscillator. a) Energy levels. b) SHO WKB wavefunctions. HW6.nb 1. (Hitoshi does this problem in his WKB notes, on page 8.

Froude Krylov Excitation Force

STABILITY. Phase portraits and local stability

Illustrating the Bohr Correspondence Principle

Review of elements of Calculus (functions in one variable)

Lecture 6 January 15, 2014

MATH 1040 Test 2 Spring 2016 Version A QP 16, 17, 20, 25, Calc 1.5, 1.6, , App D. Student s Printed Name:

Lecture #8: Quantum Mechanical Harmonic Oscillator

Lecture #5: Begin Quantum Mechanics: Free Particle and Particle in a 1D Box

Vibrational motion. Harmonic oscillator ( 諧諧諧 ) - A particle undergoes harmonic motion. Parabolic ( 拋物線 ) (8.21) d 2 (8.23)

Topic 4: The Finite Potential Well

Section 1.2 A Catalog of Essential Functions

Taylor Series and Series Convergence (Online)

ANOVA 3/12/2012. Two reasons for using ANOVA. Type I Error and Multiple Tests. Review Independent Samples t test

ECE 240a - Notes on Spontaneous Emission within a Cavity

Luis Manuel Santana Gallego 100 Investigation and simulation of the clock skew in modern integrated circuits. Clock Skew Model

Chapter 20. Orbits of Light around the Spinning Black Hole

October 27, 2018 MAT186 Week 3 Justin Ko. We use the following notation to describe the limiting behavior of functions.

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 9, February 8, 2006

Lecture 21 Matter acts like waves!

Physics 1c practical, 2015 Homework 5 Solutions

PHYSICS 149: Lecture 24

ab is shifted horizontally by h units. ab is shifted vertically by k units.

It illustrates quantum mechanical principals. It illustrates the use of differential eqns. & boundary conditions to solve for ψ

量子力学 Quantum mechanics. School of Physics and Information Technology

Lecture 6 Quantum Mechanical Systems and Measurements

Solving Systems of Linear Equations Symbolically

Each problem is worth 34 points. 1. Harmonic Oscillator Consider the Hamiltonian for a simple harmonic oscillator. 2ml 2 0. d 2

7-4 Field Calculations Using Ampere s Law

The semiclassical semiclassical model model of Electron dynamics

1D spirals: is multi stability essential?

SU(N) representations

Sample Solutions from the Student Solution Manual

Transcription:

7-1 JWKB QUANTIZATION CONDITION Last time: ( ) i 3 1. V ( ) = α φ( p) = Nep Ep p 6m hα ψ( ) = Ai( z) zeroes of Ai, Ai tales of Ai (and Bi) asymptotic forms far from turning points 2. Semi-Classical Approimation for ψ() classical wavefunction p() = [( E V() )2m] modifies classical to make it QM wavefunction ψ() = p() ep ± i h p( ) d envelope 142 c 43 adjustale phase for wiggly-variale k() oundary conditions ψ without differential equation qualitative ehavior of integrals (stationary phase) dλ validity: <<1 valid not too near turning point. d [ One reason for using semi-classical wavefunctions is that we often need to evaluate integrals of the type ψ Oˆ ψ d. If Oˆ is a slow function of, the phase factor is i p j p i d ep [ pj( ) pi( )] d. Take to find sp... δis range aout sp.. over which d = 0 h phase changes y / 2. Integral is equal to I δ.] ±π ( sp..) Logical Structure of pages 6-11 to 6-14 (not covered in lecture): 1. ψ JWKB not valid (it lows up) near turning point can t match ψ s on either side of turning point. 2. Near a turning point, ± (E), every well-ehaved V() looks linear V() V ( + (E))+ dv ( + ) d =+ first term in a Taylor series. This makes it possile to use Airy functions for any V() near turning point.

7-2 3. asymptotic-airy functions have matched amplitudes (and phase) across validity gap straddling the turning point. 4. ψ JWKB for a linear V() is identical to asymptotic-airy! TODAY 1. Summary of regions of validity for Airy, a-airy, l-jwkb, JWKB on oth sides of turning point. This seems complicated, ut it leads to a result that will e eceptionally useful! 2. WKB quantization condition: energy levels without wavefunctions! 3. compute dn E /de (for o normalization can then convert to any other kind of normalization) 4. trivial solution of Harmonic Oscillator E v = hω (v+) v = 0, 1, 2 Non-lecture (from pages 6-12 to 6-14) classical ψ a AIRY =π 1/12 1/12 2mα h 2 a foridden ψ a AIRY = π 1/12 1/12 2mα 2 h 2 a classical ψ l JWKB = C a foridden ψ l JWKB = D a ( ) 1/4 sin 2 3 ( ) 1/4 ep 2 3 ( ) 1/4 sin 2 3 ( ) 1/4 ep 2 3 C, D, and φ are determined y matching. 2mα h 2 2mα h 2 a 2mα h 2 ( ) 3/2 + π 4 a a 2mα h 2 ( ) 3/2 ( ) 3/2 +φ a ( ) 3/2 These Airy functions are not normalized, ut each pair has correct relative amplitude on opposite sides of turning point. l-jwkb has same functional form as a-airy. This permits us to link pairs of JWKB functions across invalid region and then use JWKB to etend ψ() into regions further from turning point where linear approimation to V() is no longer valid.

7-3 I CLASSICAL II FORBIDDEN ψ() (E) + Regions of Validity Near Turning Point E = V( ± (E)) OK at t.p. ut not too far ψ AIRY OK at edges of Airy ψ a AIRY region LINEAR V() Common Validity of l-jwkb and a-airy ASYMPTOTIC AIRY LINEAR V() OK far enough from t.p. ψ JWKB EXACT ψ JWKB OK at onset of JWKB region ψ l JWKB LINEAR V() JWKB Common region of validity for ψ a-airy and ψ l-jwkb same functional form, specify amplitude and phase for ψ JWKB () valid far from turning point for eact V()!

Quantization of E in Aritrary Shaped Wells 7-4 E I V ( ) E α( a) V ( ) = E ( E) = a α > 0 II V ( ) E+ β( ) V ( ) = E ( E) = + + β > 0 III a (E) = a + (E) = Already know how to splice across I, II and II, III ut how do we match ψ s in a < < region? Region I I ψ JWKB () = C 2 p() e 1 h a p( )d < a (foridden region) (real, no oscillations) Note carefully that argument of ep goes to as, thus ψ I ( ) 0. Note also that (ψ I /C) increases monotonically as increases up to = a. When you are doing matching for the first time, it is very important to verify that the phase of ψ varies with in the way you want it to.

7-5 Region II () = Cp() sin 1 h p( )d + π 4 IIa ψ JWKB a The first zero is located at an accumulated phase of (3/4)π inside =a ecause (3/4 + 1/4)π = π and sin π = 0. It does not matter that ψ IIa is invalid near = a, = a < < Note that phase increases as increases - as it must. The π/4 is the etra phase required y the AIRY splice across I,II. It reflects the tunneling of ψ() into the foridden region. PHASE starts at π/4 in classical region and always increases as one moves (further into classical region) away from turning point. NEVER FORGET! Region III III ψ JWKB () = C 2 p() e 1 h p( )d > III ψ JWKB Note that phase advances (i.e. the phase integral gets more positive) as. decreases monotonically to 0 as +. Region II again II ψ JWKB () = Cp() sin 1 h p( )d + π 4 note: argument of sine starts at π/4 and increases as one goes from = inward. In other words, opposite to ψ IIa, the argument decreases from left to right! But ψ IIa () = ψ II () for all a < <! 2 ways to satisfy this requirement 1. sin(θ() { ) = sin[ θ() 1234 argument of ψ IIa ( ) argument of ψ II + (2n + 1)π] AND C = C [sin θ = sin( θ), sin(θ +(2n + 1)π) = sin θ, sin θ = sin( θ + (2n + 1)π)]

7-6 2. sin(θ()) = sin[ θ() +2nπ] if C = C now look at what the 2 cases require for the arguments 1. C = C 1 h a pd + π 4 ψ IIa θ() 1 + pd h ( a ) = 1 h pd + π 4 ψ II θ() + ( 2n + 1)π = ( 2n +1 )π π 4 π 4 p( )d = hπ 2n + 12 a + ( 2n +1 )π [ ] Quantization. 2. C = C get p( )d = hπ 2n 12 a [ ] comine the two: a ( ) p( )d = hπ n +1 2 n =0,1,2, C = C( 1) n WKB quantization condition. Most important result of this lecture. n is # of internal nodes ecause argument always starts at π/4 and increases inward to (n + 3/4)π at other turning point. inner t.p. outer t.p. for n = 0 sin(π/4) sin(3π/4) NO NODE! n = 1 sin(π/4) sin(7π/4) 1 node. etc. Node count tells what level it is. pd at aritrary E proe tells how many levels there are at E E proe!

7-7 Density of States dn de h dn de is the classical period of oscillation. n(e) = 2 p E ( )d 1 + (E) h (E) 2 dn de = 2 h p E( + ) d + de p E( ) d de + ut p E ( ± ) 0 dn de = 2 d 2mE V( h + [ de ( ) ) ] d + dp E de d (must take derivatives of limits of integration as well as integrand) dn de = 2 h 1 2 + [ ( ) ] d (2m) 2m E V( ) you show that, for harmonic oscillator V() = 1 2 k2 ω ( km) that dn de = 1 hω independent of E, thus period of h.o. is independent of E. Non-lecture for general o normalization + = LLL: can still use this to compute dn de ecause d + de =0 (even though p E( + ) 0). location of right hand turning point is independent of E. Can always use WKB quantization to compute density of o normalized ψ E s, provided that E > V() everywhere ecept the 2 turning points.

7-8 Use WKB to solve a few standard prolems. Since WKB is semi-classical, we epect it to work in the n limit. Could e some errors for a few of the lowest-n E n s. Harmonic Oscillator V() = k 2 /2 12 / 1 2 p ( ) = 2m E k 2 At turning points, V tp Eand p thus, at turning points ± =±[ 2En k] 1 2 ecause En = k± 2 ( )= ( tp)= [ ] + = 2E n k 12 / 0, [ ( )] d hπ( n + )= 2m E n k 2 2 [ ] = 2E n k Non-lecture: Dwight Integral Tale 350.01 t [ a 2 2 ] I = 2mk 2 td = t 2 + a2 2 sin 1 ( / a) here t =0 at oth + and - ( ) [ 2E n k] 2E n k 2 [ 2E n k] ( ) 2E n I = 2mk 2 I = m k k [ ] d [ ] sin 1 1 sin 1 ( 1) E ( n ( π 2) ( π 2) )=π m k (k is force constant, not wave vector) E n V() use the nonlecture result: hπ ( n + )=π m k E n E n = h k m 12 4 34 ω ( n + )

7-9 I suggest you apply WKB Quantization Condition to the following prolems: See Shankar pages 454-457. Vee V() = a E n ( n + ) quartic V() = 4 E n ( n + ) l = 0, H atom V() = c 1 E n n 2 harmonic V() = 1 2 k2 E n ( n + ) What does this tell you aout the relationship etween the eponents m and α in V m m and E n n α? power of in V() power of n in E(n) 1 2 1 2/3 2 1 4 4/3 Validity limits of WKB? splicing of ψ IIa,ψ II? d 2 V d 2 can t e too large near the splice region ψ JWKB is ad when dλ d > ~ 1 (λ changes y more than itself for = λ) near turning points and near the minimum of V() can t use WKB QC if there are more than 2 turning points near ottom of well d2 V dλ d 2 is not small and d > 1 (near oth turning points). However, most wells look harmonic near minimum and WKB gives eact result for harmonic oscillator - should e more OK than one has any right to epect. semi-classical: should e good in high-n limit. If eact E n has same form as WKB QC at low-n, WKB E n is valid for all n. H.O., Morse Oscillator