Feasible Mission Designs for Solar Probe Plus to Launch in 2015, 2016, 2017, or November 19, 2008

Similar documents
Mission Design Options for Solar-C Plan-A

Solar Orbiter Ballistic Transfer Mission Analysis Synthesis

Trajectory options to Pluto via gravity assists from Venus, Mars, and Jupiter

(95) CASSINI INTERPLANETARY TRAJECTORY DESIGN

JUICE/Laplace Mission Summary & Status

ISAS MERCURY ORBITER MISSION TRAJECTORY DESIGN STRATEGY. Hiroshi Yamakawa

Interplanetary Mission Opportunities

Orbital Dynamics and Impact Probability Analysis

LEARNING ABOUT THE OUTER PLANETS. NASA's Cassini spacecraft. Io Above Jupiter s Clouds on New Year's Day, Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona

OPTIMISATION COMPETITION

Newton s Legacy. 1- accelerate to break free of Earth. Rocket Science: How to send a spacecraft to Mars

ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS TWO SYNODIC PERIOD EARTH-MARS CYCLER TRAJECTORIES

Powered Space Flight

THE TRAJECTORY CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR AKATSUKI RE-INSERTION INTO THE VENUS ORBIT

Analysis of V, Leveraging for Interplanetary Missions

The optimization of electric propulsion (EP) trajectories for interplanetary missions is a quite difficult

Flight and Orbital Mechanics

DEFLECTING HAZARDOUS ASTEROIDS FROM COLLISION WITH THE EARTH BY USING SMALL ASTEROIDS

Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution Mission (MAVEN) Status of the MAVEN Mission at Mars 18 May 2018

On the. Transits of Venus

ESA s Juice: Mission Summary and Fact Sheet

Launch Period Development for the Juno Mission to Jupiter

Deep Impact Continued Investigations (DI3) Tony Farnham

AKATSUKI s Second Journey to Venus. 7 October 2015 Chikako Hirose Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

Toward Venus orbit insertion of Akatsuki

Operational Aspects of Space Weather-Related Missions

Toward Venus orbit insertion of Akatsuki

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Results found by the CNES team (team #4)

SOLAR PROBE PLUS MISSION DESIGN OVERVIEW AND MISSION PROFILE

Some Methods for Global Trajectory Optimisation

TRAJECTORY DESIGN OF SOLAR ORBITER

C A S S I N I MISSION PLAN. REVISION O, Change 1 August Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology

The B-Plane Interplanetary Mission Design

Astrodynamics of Moving Asteroids

Jupiter. Jupiter is the third-brightest object in the night sky (after the Moon and Venus). Exploration by Spacecrafts

Supplemental info for MCR : Change Science Orbit Period from 11 Days to 14 Days

NEW HORIZONS 2. New Horizons: A Journey to New Frontiers

Juno Status and Earth Flyby Plans. C. J. Hansen

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30.

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

Propulsion Technology Assessment: Science and Enabling Technologies to Explore the Interstellar Medium

PLANETARY MISSIONS FROM GTO USING EARTH AND MOON GRAVITY ASSISTS*

Mr. XYZ. Stock Market Trading and Investment Astrology Report. Report Duration: 12 months. Type: Both Stocks and Option. Date: Apr 12, 2011

BepiColombo Launch Window Design Based on a Phasing Loop Strategy

Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology. Juno Update

Interplanetary Trajectory design for Rosetta and Solar Orbiter

ROSETTA. One Comet Rendezvous and two Asteroid Fly-bys. Rita Schulz Rosetta Project Scientist

Juno. Fran Bagenal University of Colorado

MESSENGER SIX PRIMARY MANEUVERS, SIX PLANETARY FLYBYS, AND 6.6 YEARS TO MERCURY ORBIT

Scott Bolton OPAG February 1, 2016

Chapter 4. Motion and gravity

Systems Engineering in Venus Satellite

VLBA Astrometry of Planetary Orbiters

JUICE: A European Mission to Jupiter and its Icy Moons. Claire Vallat Prague, 15 th November 2018

JUpiter Icy Moons Explorer (JUICE) Status report for OPAG. N. Altobelli (on behalf of O. Witasse) JUICE artist impression (Credits ESA, AOES)

Overview of the Jovian Exploration Technology Reference Studies

Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

Planetary Protection Trajectory Analysis for the Juno Mission

New Horizons Pluto Kuiper Belt mission: design and simulation of the Pluto Charon encounter

A study of trajectories to the Neptune system using gravity assists

BepiColombo Project Status. Presentation for MESSENGER Science Team Meeting Via-Skype, 27 th March 2015

ABOUT COMBINING TISSERAND GRAPH GRAVITY-ASSIST SEQUENCING WITH LOW-THRUST TRAJECTORY OPTIMIZATION

ASTEROID IMPACT MISSION: AIM3P MISSION AND PAYLOAD OPERATIONS SCENARIO

LOW-COST LUNAR COMMUNICATION AND NAVIGATION

NASA s Planetary Science Program Status

Remote Imaging of Electron Acceleration at the Sun with a Lunar Radio Array

NEW TRAJECTORY OPTIONS FOR BALLISTIC MERCURY ORBITER MISSION. Chen-wan L. Yen

Lecture 2 Motions in the Sky September 10, 2018

Patterns in the Solar System (Chapter 18)

Current Status of Hayabusa2. Makoto Yoshikawa, Yuichi Tsuda, Hayabusa2 Project Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

DAILY QUESTIONS 28 TH JUNE 18 REASONING - CALENDAR

An Overview of BepiColombo Thermal Analysis

HERA MISSION & CM16 lessons learned

Orbiter Element Brian Cooke

InSight Spacecraft Launch for Mission to Interior of Mars

The escape speed for an object leaving the surface of any celestial body of mass M and radius d is

Astronomy Regents Review

Part 1: the terrestrial planets

Solar Orbiter. T.Appourchaux, L.Gizon and the SO / PHI team derived from M.Velli's and P.Kletzkine's presentations

AIM RS: Radio Science Investigation with AIM

NASA Planetary Science Programs

INTRODUCTION TO ORBITAL MECHANICS - MODEL & SIMULATION SOFTWARE (OM-MSS) Earth, Sun, Moon & Satellites Motion in Orbit - Model & Simulation Software

Interplanetary Mission Analysis

BepiColombo. Project and MPO Status. Comprehensive Explora1on of Planet Mercury

Escaping the Zodi Light! Harvey Moseley! NASA/GSFC! The View from 5 AU! March 26, 2010!

FIRE SAIL: MESSENGER S USE OF SOLAR RADIATION PRESSURE FOR ACCURATE MERCURY FLYBYS

Lunar Geology ASTR 2120 Sarazin

PHSC 1053: Astronomy Time and Coordinates

GRAIL Takes A Roundabout Route To Lunar Orbit

Research Article Analysis of Electric Propulsion System for Exploration of Saturn

1 The Solar System. 1.1 a journey into our galaxy

Low Cost Enceladus Sample Return Mission Concept

NEW HORIZONS MISSION DESIGN FOR THE PLUTO-KUIPER BELT MISSION

Asteroid Redirect Mission: Candidate Targets. Paul Chodas, NEO Program Office, JPL

Saturn and Planetary Rings 4/5/07

Lab 6: The Planets and Kepler

Earth s Motions. Rotation -!! Period of Rotation - amount of time to make one complete rotation Example: Earth rotates in hours.

ASE 379L Space Systems Engineering Fb February 4, Group 1: Johnny Sangree. Nimisha Mittal Zach Aitken

Solar System Observations with Spitzer

Transcription:

Feasible Mission Designs for Solar Probe Plus to Launch in 2015, 2016, 2017, or 2018

2007 Solar Probe Study & Mission Requirements Trajectory study and mission design trades were conducted in the fall of 2007 aimed to develop a feasible mission design for Solar Probe under NASA s new direction and guidelines. The new program constraints and mission requirements include: No nuclear power source Perihelion distance less than 10 Rs* Three flybys with perihelion less than 10 Rs Mission duration less than 10 years Launch time around 2015 Total mission cost under $750 Million *Rs = Solar radius

Various Trajectory Designs Representing Different Mission Concepts Developed Option-1 Option-2 Option-3 Option-4 Option-5 Option-6

Characteristics of The Various Trajectory Types Trajectory Option Option-1 Option-2 Option-3 Option-4 Option5 Option-6 Date 11/20/2015 5/30/2015 5/30/2015 9/6/2014 5/21/2015 5/24/2015 Launch C3 (km 2 /s 2 ) 114 156 156 108 158 128 3 Earth, 7 Flybys 1 Jupiter 5 Venus 9 Venus Venus 7 Venus 1 Earth, 9 Venus Trajectory Deep Space Maneuver (ΔV) None None None 1 (232 m/s) None 1 (397 m/s) Max Aphelion (AU) 5.56 1 1 2.29 1 1.19 Perihelion (Rs) 4 11.8 39.8 9.5 9.5 9 Aphelion (AU) 5.56 0.75 0.725 0.73 0.73 0.73 Final orbit Inclination from ecliptic (deg) 90 3.4 37.9 2.9 3.4 3.4 Orbital period 4.6 yr 94 d 112 d 88 d 88 d 88 d Timeline launch to min. peri. 4.1 yr 3.3 yr 2.1 yr 10 yr 6.4 yr 9.5 yr Mission duration 4.5 yr 3.8 yr 5.8 yr 10.5 yr 6.9 yr 9.95 yr Near Sun Total # of solar Pass passes (< 0.2 AU) 1 12 18 16 24 21 Pole-to-pole solar flyby at 4 Rs Pros Cons Single solar flyby; great aphelion distance; long cruise; long orbit Period Short mission duration; multiple, frequent solar flybys; aphelion < 1 AU Low inclination ; high C3 Short mission duration; multiple, frequent solar flybys; aphelion< 1 AU Large perihelion distance; high C3 Good perihelion distance; multiple, frequent Solar flybys; moderate C3 Long mission duration; requiring deep space maneuver Good perihelion distance; multiple frequent solar flybys; short mission duration; no deep space maneuver; aphelion < 1 AU low inclination; high C3 Good perihelion distance; multiple, frequent solar flybys; moderate C3 Long mission duration; requiring deep space maneuver

V 7 GA Launch Opportunity (occurring every 19 months) Launch Opportunity 2013 2015 2017 2018 Launch Date 10/25/2013 5/31/2015 1/10/2017 8/9/2018 Optimum C3 (km 2 /s 2 ) 170.0 155.6 177.2 157.0 Trajectory Flybys 7 Venus 7 Venus 7 Venus 7 Venus Deep Space Maneuver (ΔV) None None None None Max aphelion (AU) 1 1 1 1 Final orbit Perihelion (Rs) 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 Aphelion (AU) 0.73 0.73 0.72 0.73 Inclination from ecliptic (deg) 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 Orbital period (day) 88 88 87 88 Near Sun Pass Timeline Total # of solar passes (< 0.2 AU) 24 24 24 24 Launch to min perihelion (yr) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 Mission duration (including three 9.5- Rs passes) (yr) 6.9 6.9 6.8 6.9

New EV 7 GA (Earth plus 7 Venus flyby-gravity Assist) Design Strategy Maintained a mission concept similar to the 2015 baseline mission and kept all favorable trajectory features Utilized two different trajectory designs to lower launch C3 requirement, keeping the maximum launch C3 to no more than 158 km 2 /s 2 (same as with 2015 launch) Designed the launch with two separate launch periods to increase the total number of launch dates under limited launch C3, a total of launch dates being increased to 4 weeks (1 week more than 2015 launch) Constrained to no deep space maneuvers as required Constrained maximum aphelion to 1 AU (same as with 2015 launch) Requiring no new changes to the spacecraft design to be developed for the 2015 launch

New EV 7 GA Mission Design for 2017 Launch Preliminary Design Launch Dates: Aug 3-15, Aug 24 - Sept 7, 2017 (28 days) (1 week longer than 2015 launch) Max. Launch C3: 158 km 2 /s 2 (same as 2015 launch) Trajectory Design Earth-Venus-Venus-Venus-Venus-Venus-Venus-Venus Gravity Assists (EV 7 GA) (one extra Earth flyby than V 7 GA) No deep space maneuver 26 perihelion passes (2 passes more than V 7 GA) Aphelion < 1.05 AU Perihelion gradually decreases to 9.5 R S Final Solar Orbit (same as V 7 GA) Perihelion: 9.5 R S (8.5 Rs from Sun s surface) Aphelion: 0.73 AU Inclination: 3.4 deg from ecliptic Orbit period: 88 days Timeline Launch to 1st min perihelion (9.5 Rs): 7.3 to 7.4 years (one year longer than V 7 GA) Mission duration (3 passes @ 9.5 Rs): 7.8 to 7.9 years (one year longer than V 7 GA)

EV 7 GA Mission Trajectory (Preliminary Design) Trajectory I: for launch from August 3 through 15, 2017 Launch Trajectory II: for launch from August 24 through September 7, 2017 Launch 1st Min Perihelion @ 9.5 R S Dec 2024 Sun Sun Mercury Mercury Earth Venus 1st Perihelion (0.23 AU) Nov 2017 Earth Venus 1st Perihelion (0.25 AU) Nov 2017

New V 8 GA (8 Venus Flyby-Gravity Assist) Mission Design for 2016 Launch Preliminary Design Launch Dates: July 2016 (20 days or more) (can be longer than 2015 launch) Max. Launch C3: ~154 km 2 /s 2 (less than 2015 launch) Trajectory Design Eight Venus Gravity Assists (V 8 GA) (one more Venus flyby than V 7 GA) No deep space maneuver 27 perihelion passes (3 passes more than V 7 GA) Aphelion < 1.02 AU Perihelion gradually decreases to 9.5 R S Final Solar Orbit (same as V 7 GA) Perihelion: 9.5 R S (8.5 Rs from Sun s surface) Aphelion: 0.73 AU Inclination: 3.4 deg from ecliptic Orbit period: 88 days Timeline Launch to 1st min perihelion (9.5 R S ): 7.7 years (1.3 years longer than V 7 GA) Mission duration (3 passes @ 9.5 Rs): 8.3 years (1.4 years longer than V 7 GA)

V 8 GA Mission Trajectory Preliminary Design Launch July 2016 1st Min Perihelion @ 9.5 R S April 2024 Sun 1st Perihelion (0.2 AU) October 2016 Earth Venus Mercury

Feasible Mission Designs Enabling Solar Probe Plus to Launch Yearly: 2015-2018 Launch Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 Mission Design V 7 GA EV 7 GA V 8 GA V 7 GA Launch C3 (km2/s2) 158 154 158 159 Launch Period (days) 20 20 28 20 Number of Flybys 7 8 8 7 Minimum Perihelion 9.5 Rs 9.5 Rs 9.5 Rs 9.5 Rs Total # of Passes 24 27 26 26 # of 9.5-Rs Passes 3 3 3 3 Mission Duration (years) 6.9 8.3 7.9 6.9 Date of 1 st Min. Perihelion Oct 2021 Apr 2024 Dec 2024 Dec 2024

Summary and Future Work Feasible mission designs for 2015-2018 launch have been developed. The baseline spacecraft design should work for each mission design. This is a work in progress. While the 2016 and 2017 opportunities are feasible, more work needs to be done to Analyze the details of each trajectory, such as solar conjunctions, Sun-Probe-Earth angles, etc. Determine if there is any impact on spacecraft design and concept of operations for each new design, such as data downlink strategy, power management, etc. Assess the added cost and risk associated with longer mission with more planetary fly-bys.