INVESTIGATION OF ORBITAL EVOLUTION OF INTERPLANETARY DUST PARTICLES ORIGINATING FROM KUIPER BELT AND ASTEROID BELT OBJECTS

Similar documents
Lecture Outlines. Chapter 15. Astronomy Today 7th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

Mars Growth Stunted by an Early Orbital Instability between the Giant Planets

The dynamical evolution of the asteroid belt in the pebble accretion scenario

Kuiper Belt Dynamics and Interactions

1star 1 star 9 8 planets 63 (major) moons asteroids, comets, meteoroids

Detectability of extrasolar debris. Mark Wyatt Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge

OUR SOLAR SYSTEM. James Martin. Facebook.com/groups/AstroLSSC Twitter.com/AstroLSSC

Chapter 06 Let s Make a Solar System

How did it come to be this way? Will I stop sounding like the

The Fomalhaut Debris Disk

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 6. Astronomy Today 7th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapters 7&8. ASTRONOMY 202 Spring 2007: Solar System Exploration. Class 21: Solar System [3/12/07] Announcements.

9.2 - Our Solar System

Planetary system dynamics Part III Mathematics / Part III Astrophysics

Phys 214. Planets and Life

Moon Obs #1 Due! Moon visible: early morning through afternoon. 6 more due June 13 th. 15 total due June 25 th. Final Report Due June 28th

Which of the following planets are all made up of gas? When a planets orbit around the Sun looks like an oval, it s called a(n)

Dynamical Stability of Terrestrial and Giant Planets in the HD Planetary System

Why are Saturn s rings confined to a thin plane? 1. Tidal forces 2. Newton s 1st law 3. Conservation of energy 4. Conservation of angular momentum

What is it like? When did it form? How did it form. The Solar System. Fall, 2005 Astronomy 110 1

Astronomy A BEGINNER S GUIDE TO THE UNIVERSE EIGHTH EDITION

Survey of the Solar System. The Sun Giant Planets Terrestrial Planets Minor Planets Satellite/Ring Systems

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 15. Astronomy Today 8th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

The Formation of the Solar System

Solar System revised.notebook October 12, 2016 Solar Nebula Theory

HNRS 227 Fall 2006 Chapter 13. What is Pluto? What is a Planet? There are two broad categories of planets: Terrestrial and Jovian

Astro 1: Introductory Astronomy

Outline. Question of Scale. Planets Dance. Homework #2 was due today at 11:50am! It s too late now.

Planetarium observing is over. Nighttime observing starts next week.

The Solar System - I. Alexei Gilchrist. [The Story of the Solar System]

Origin of the Solar System

Bound Orbit of Sub-micron Size Non-spherical Silicate Dust Particles in the Dust Band of the Asteroid Belt

Overview of the Solar System. Solar system contents one star, several planets, lots of debris.

Importance of the study of extrasolar planets. Exoplanets Introduction. Importance of the study of extrasolar planets

Planets: Name Distance from Sun Satellites Year Day Mercury 0.4AU yr 60 days Venus yr 243 days* Earth 1 1 yr 1 day Mars 1.

Which of the following statements best describes the general pattern of composition among the four jovian

This asteroid was visited by the NEAR Shoemaker probe, which orbited it, taking extensive photographs of its

Prentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE

Planetary System Stability and Evolution. N. Jeremy Kasdin Princeton University

A star is a massive sphere of gases with a core like a thermonuclear reactor. They are the most common celestial bodies in the universe are stars.

Initial Conditions: The temperature varies with distance from the protosun.

[12] Overview of the Solar System (10/5/17)

Astronomy 111 Review Problems Solutions

Transneptunian objects. Minor bodies in the outer Solar System. Transneptunian objects

23.1 The Solar System. Orbits of the Planets. Planetary Data The Solar System. Scale of the Planets The Solar System

ABSTACT KUIPER BINARY OBJECT FORMATION

Human Understanding of both Earth and Space has Changed Over Time. Unit E: Topic One

Cosmology Vocabulary

ASTR 200 : Lecture 6 Introduction to the Solar System Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Addison-Wesley

Astronomy Test Review. 3 rd Grade

Unit 6 Lesson 4 What Are the Planets in Our Solar System? Copyright Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

Dynamic Exoplanets. Alexander James Mustill

Debris Disks and the Evolution of Planetary Systems. Christine Chen September 1, 2009

Notes: The Solar System

Origin of the Solar System

Astronomy 405 Solar System and ISM

Prentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE

Structure of the Kuiper Belt Dust Disk

on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as though it had nothing else in the Universe to do. Galileo Galilei

Formation of the Solar System Chapter 8

Inner Planets (Part II)

Assessment Vocabulary Instructional Strategies

The solar system pt 2 MR. BANKS 8 TH GRADE SCIENCE

CHAPTER-9 ASTEROIDS-BELT, KUIPER-BELT AND OORT-CLOUD. Highlights about the chapter. in MATERIALISTIC UNIVERSE by Ramesh Varma.

Comparative Planetology I: Our Solar System. Chapter Seven

Origin of the Solar System

Astronomy 405 Solar System and ISM

Chapter 15 The Formation of Planetary Systems

Astronomy 111 Exam Review Problems (Real exam will be Tuesday Oct 25, 2016)

Formation of the Solar System. What We Know. What We Know

Yes, inner planets tend to be and outer planets tend to be.

A REGION VOID OF IRREGULAR SATELLITES AROUND JUPITER

Lecture 16. How did it happen? How long did it take? Where did it occur? Was there more than 1 process?

4. THE SOLAR SYSTEM 1.1. THE SUN. Exercises

Pluto, the Kuiper Belt, and Trans- Neptunian Objects

A few points on the dynamical evolution of the young solar system. Renu Malhotra The University of Arizona

9. Formation of the Solar System

Astronomy November, 2016 Introduction to Astronomy: The Solar System. Mid-term Exam 3. Practice Version. Name (written legibly):

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

-Melissa Greenberg, Arielle Hoffman, Zachary Feldmann, Ryan Pozin, Elizabeth Weeks, Christopher Pesota, & Sara Pilcher

What s in Our Solar System?

Astronomy 210 Midterm #2

Comparative Planetology I: Our Solar System. Chapter Seven

Chaos and stability in the vicinity of a Jovian planet

The Solar System LEARNING TARGETS. Scientific Language. Name Test Date Hour

Astronomy 241: Foundations of Astrophysics I. The Solar System

Overview of the Solar System

Accretionary Disk Model

Science Skills Station

What is Earth Science?

Nature and Origin of Planetary Systems f p "

What Have We Found? 1978 planets in 1488 systems as of 11/15/15 ( ) 1642 planets candidates (

Chapter 15: The Origin of the Solar System

The Solar Nebula Theory. This lecture will help you understand: Conceptual Integrated Science. Chapter 28 THE SOLAR SYSTEM

Astronomy. physics.wm.edu/~hancock/171/ A. Dayle Hancock. Small 239. Office hours: MTWR 10-11am

Contents of the Solar System

Radioactive Dating. U238>Pb206. Halflife: Oldest earth rocks. Meteors and Moon rocks. 4.5 billion years billion years

SPACE NOTES 2. Covers Objectives 3, 4, and 8

SIGNATURES OF EXOSOLAR PLANETS IN DUST DEBRIS DISKS Leonid M. Ozernoy, 1,2 Nick N. Gorkavyi, 2 John C. Mather, 2 and Tanya A.

Edmonds Community College ASTRONOMY 100 Sample Test #2 Fall Quarter 2006

Transcription:

INVESTIGATION OF ORBITAL EVOLUTION OF INTERPLANETARY DUST PARTICLES ORIGINATING FROM KUIPER BELT AND ASTEROID BELT OBJECTS 1 PALAK DHARSANDIA, 2 DR. JAYESH PABARI, 3 DR. CHARMY PATEL 1 Research Scholar, V. V. P. Engineering College, Rajkot 2 Researcher, Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad 3 Associate Professor and Head of the Electronics and communication department, V. V. P. Engineering College, Rajkot Palak.dharsandia@gmail.com, jayesh@prl.res.in, crpvvp@gmail.com ABSTRACT : It is known that interplanetary dust particles are originated from the Kuiper belt object in solar system. Asteroids and short period comets are also considered as two major sources of interplanetary dust particles. To know the expected orbital evolution of dust grains we used Mercury code. In this simulation, we have used hybrid symplectic algorithm for the integration. The code is capable of handling the close encounter between the objects. The model includes gravitational effect of known planets and the Sun, Poynting-Robertson (P-R) drag, solar wind drag, and radiation pressure. A set of ratio of radiation pressure force and gravitational force values taken are 0.2, 0.1, and 0.05 in this simulation. The orbital evolution of dust grains of radii 1 to 10 are calculated. Due to the effect of the radiation forces, small dust grains spiral out from the solar system. The bigger (>0.5 µm) dust particles spiral in towards the Sun. This orbital evolution of dust particles undergo influence of gravitational perturbation and mean motion resonance with planets. When they escape the resonance, their journey start again. Our result shows that in inner solar system lesser dust are coming from Kuiper belt compared to those from asteroid belt. Kuiperoidal dust grains are seen to behave same like asteroidal dust. The result is useful to understand the dust movement in solar system. Key Words : Interplanetary Dust, Kuiperoidal Dust, Asteroidal Dust 1. INTRODUCTION In recent intimation NASA founded that a cloud of dust was encircling mars above high-altitude atmosphere [Christian 2015]. This Interplanetary dust particles (IDPs) are too grandly. It is considered to have perform important role in the composition and enhancement of our solar disc. Inter planetary dust particles are one kind of the natural component of solar system. Our solar system has with IDPs. Whose motion is governed by combined gravitational effect of the big bodies of the solar system, radiation force, P-R drag and solar wind drag [Stanley F. Dermott 1996]. Asteroids and short-period comets have been two major sources of IDPs. It is also recognized that trans-neptunium might also be one of the sources of IDPs. In this paper, orbital pattern of IDPs is numerically simulated. We stretched out of orbital evolution of dust particles with the help of Mercury model [J. E. Chamber 1998]. By taking two different sources of IDPs, i.e. asteroid belt and Kuiper belt. 2. COMPUTATIONAL METHOD AND INITIAL CONDITION Using Hybrid Symplectic integrator [J. E. Chamber 1998] we, explore the orbital evolution of interplanetary dust particles under the effect of gravitational force of all planets, the Sun, PR drag, radiation drag and solar wind. The essential theory of hybrid symplectic integrator can be clear with understanding of Hamilton s equation. These give the rate of change of position x, and rate of change of momentum p, for all objects in solar system. This equation are [Ref. J. E. Chamber 1998] =. (1) = -. (2) The Hamiltonian H is addition of kinetic energy and potential energy of all bodies defined as [Ref. J. E. Chamber 1998] H = G. (3) where is mass of the body i and is separation of body i and j. ISSN: 0975 6779 NOV 16 TO OCT 17 VOLUME 04, ISSUE 02 Page 1512

We take the quantity as a ratio of radiation pressure force and solar gravitational force. In our simulation, the values of is consider as a 0.2, 0.1 and 0.05 for particle density 1 gm. cm -3 are taken. [Ref. Burns et al. 1979] has given the expression of as.. (4)!" Where # is the particle s density in gm. cm -3 and ' is the radius in, and ( is the radiation pressure coefficient. For particles larger than 1 ( is close to unity. Figure 1 shows that efficiency of drag forces decrease while increase in the particles size. Effect of radiation pressure is significant when size of particles are in order of 40 micron or less. Figure 1 : Variation of beta with particle's radius The particles come out of the asteroid or comets due to outgassing and collisions. When particles come out from parent body they will immediately feel drag forces like P-R drag, solar wind drags and radiation pressure and move to new semi-major axis and eccentricity, which are different from its parent body. Let $ % and & % are the new semi-major axis and eccentricity of dust particles when particle leave its parent body. The parameter a and e are the actual semi-major axis and eccentricity of the parent body while dust particles are part of the parent body [Jackson and Zook 1992] $ % )1+,)1+&,$ )1+&+2, & % )&., )1+, Figure 2 shows how the new semi-major axis varies for different sizes of particles while modified by radiation pressure. There are two different sizes of particles taken first is for asteroid and the other is for comet. For asteroid (a = 2.77, e = 0.17) taken as an average of main belt from [Allen 1962] and for a comet (a = 3.5, e = 0.6) taken from the range given by [Porter 1963]. One can observed from the results that the dust particles initiate their orbital evolution from starting orbits that is different from its parent body. Figure 2 : Radiation modified distance of the dust grains originated from their parent bodies 3. EVOLUTION OF DUST FROM KUIPER BELT OBJECTS The average distance of Kuiperoidal dust from Sun is far while that of asteroidal dust. Because of this large distance Kuiperoidal dust experience very little solar drag forces. The gravitational force experienced is also small compared to that experienced by asteroid belt dust. We have taken 130 objects of Kuiper belt as a parent body of dust particles and calculated new semi-major axes and eccentricities for dust particles considering three β values. The dust initially was distributed in a spatial ISSN: 0975 6779 NOV 16 TO OCT 17 VOLUME 04, ISSUE 02 Page 1513

range of 30-70 AU. We have divided the dust into 4 bins of 10 AU according to the distance from Sun. First bin ranges from 30 to 40 AU and so on. These dust particles were simulated for β = 0.05. As β value increases distance of the particles from Sun also increases. Table 1 summarizes initial parameters and orbital condition during the simulation time period of the dust grain under consideration. Table 1 Orbital condition of Kuiper belt at various distance β value Distance Orbital condition 30-40 MMR 0.05 40-50 MMR 50-60 MMR 40-50 Stable 0.1 50-60 Stable 70-80 Ejected 50-60 Stable 0.2 70-80 Ejected The Kuiperoidal dust behaviour is same as the asteroidal dust, with the only difference that, effect of a slower P- R drag and a stronger potency of the giant planets, the preface of gravitational force and resonance captured must be more consideration for it. Figure 3. shows the result of simulation with Kuiper belt dust of different initial semimajor axis and β combination. X axis shows time in year and Y axis shows the semimajor axis in AU. In this graph few particles are ejected, few particles are captured in Mean Motion Resonance (MMR) with planets. After the particles escape MMR, their semi-major axis decreases and they start their journey towards the Sun. Few particles stay temporally captured in solar system, they apparent do not undergo MMR nor they get ejected in the shown time period. Particles with (β = 0.1, a = 76.6) and (β = 0.2 and a = 75.24) are ejected from solar system. Particles with (β = 0.05, a = 55.6), and (β = 0.05, a = 38.4), and (β = 0.05, a = 45.6) are trapped in MMR with Neptune and Uranus. Other particles are stay temporally in solar system. Therefore, particles in great distance (~ 75 AU) get ejected within 100 1000 years of their motion almost regardless of their size. This plot also shows the particles with β = 0.05 undergoes MMR while particles with larger β values but at similar distance does not undergo MMR. Figure 3 : Temporally evolution of semi-major axis of dust particles from Kuiper belt objects Temporal Evolution of eccentricity and inclination corresponding to the particles in Figure 3 has been shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5 respectively. Particles undergoing MMR is seen to spiral in towards Sun as seen in Figure 4 and Figure 5. ISSN: 0975 6779 NOV 16 TO OCT 17 VOLUME 04, ISSUE 02 Page 1514

Figure 4 : Temporally evolution of eccentricity of dust particles from Kuiper belt objects Figure 5 : Temporally evolution of inclination of dust particles from Kuiper belt objects 4. EVOLUTION OF DUST FROM ASTEROID BELT OBJECTS This section includes the distribution of dust from asteroid belt objects. Asteroid belt is between Jupiter and Mars. Therefore, MMR with Earth Jupiter and Mars plays important role in orbital evolution of asteroidal dust. The simulation for asteroidal dust particles has been done considering three regions main belt, inner belt and outer belt. 50 objects from, 100 objects from inner belt and 97 objects from outer belt is considered as parent body in the calculation. We take a mean of semimajor axis and eccentricity for each region of the asteroid belt for three β values in our simulation. Table 2. Summarized the simulation result of asteroid belt dust. Table 2 Orbital condition of asteroid belt at various distance Β Distance 0.05 0.1 0.2 Orbital condition Stable Figure 6. Shows the result of the simulation for asteroid belt dust. X axis shows time in year and Y axis shows the semimajor axis in AU. In this simulation all the particles are seem to undergo MMR but the one with β value 0.05 and a = 2.02. This shows that for asteroid belt dust β = 0.05 and a = 2.02 can be minimum condition for stable orbit. Corresponding eccentricity and inclination are shown in figure 7 and Figure 8. Figure 6 : Temporally evolution of semi-major axis of dust particles from asteroid belt objects ISSN: 0975 6779 NOV 16 TO OCT 17 VOLUME 04, ISSUE 02 Page 1515

Figure 7 : Temporally evolution of eccentricity of dust particles from asteroid belt objects Figure 8 : Temporally evolution of inclination of dust particles from asteroid belt objects 5. CONCLUSION We have studied the orbital evolution of dust particles originated from Kuiper and asteroid belt objects. These dust particles show different nature in their orbital evolution. We found that dust particles from Kuiper belt with a distance greater than 75 AU get ejected within 100 1000 years of motion. For particles with β = 0.05 within distance 38 55 AU undergoes MMR but if β is increased for the same distances the MMR does not happen. Unlike Kuiper belt almost all the particles of asteroid belt get ejected after going through MMR. Particles with a 2.02 and β = 0.05 are in relatively stable orbit. The result given in this paper are useful to understand dust movement in the solar system. 6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Authors thank Dr. J. E. chamber for providing suggestion for the Mercury model and Mr. Ashimananda Modak for fruitful discussion and suggestions. 7. REFERENCES 1. Stanley F. Dermott et al., Kuiper belt dust grains as a source of interplanetary dust particle, ICARUS, 1996 124, 429-440. 2. J. E. Chambers et al., A hybrid symplectic integrator that permits close encounters between massive bodies, Astron., 1998. 3. Alexander V. Krivov et al., Martian dust belts: waiting for discovery, Icarus, 1997, 128, 335-353. 4. A. Jackson et al., Orbital evolution of dust particles from comets and asteroid, Icarus, 1992, 97, 70-84. 5. Nick N. Gorkavyi et al., Distribution of dust from Kuiper belt objects, astrophysics, 2000. 6. Burns et al, Radiation force on small particles in the solar system, Icarus, 1979, 40, 1-48. 7. Allen C. W. et al., Astrophysical quantities, The athelone press, University of London,1962. 8. Porter J. G. et al., Statistics of comet orbits, in the moon,meteorites and comets,1963 ISSN: 0975 6779 NOV 16 TO OCT 17 VOLUME 04, ISSUE 02 Page 1516