A global version of the quantum duality principle

Similar documents
QUANTUM DUALITY PRINCIPLE FOR COISOTROPIC SUBGROUPS AND POISSON QUOTIENTS

arxiv:math/ v8 [math.qa] 2 Jun 2017

THE QUANTUM DOUBLE AS A HOPF ALGEBRA

Notes on p-divisible Groups

QUANTIZATION VIA DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON STACKS

ALGEBRA EXERCISES, PhD EXAMINATION LEVEL

Quantum Groups and Link Invariants

Duality, Residues, Fundamental class

3d Gauge Theories, Symplectic Duality and Knot Homology I. Tudor Dimofte Notes by Qiaochu Yuan

Math 210B. Artin Rees and completions

A REMARK ON SIMPLICITY OF VERTEX ALGEBRAS AND LIE CONFORMAL ALGEBRAS

Transcendental Numbers and Hopf Algebras

A Version of the Grothendieck Conjecture for p-adic Local Fields

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4)

Erwin Schrödinger International Institute of Mathematical Physics, Wien, Austria. Sept. 01, 1999

D-MODULES: AN INTRODUCTION

NOTES ON FINITE FIELDS

PROBLEMS, MATH 214A. Affine and quasi-affine varieties

Lecture 4 Super Lie groups

Math 396. Quotient spaces

Lie Superalgebras and Lie Supergroups, II

Hopf algebra structures in particle physics

Sample algebra qualifying exam

Towers of algebras categorify the Heisenberg double

PBW for an inclusion of Lie algebras

REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE: EXERCISES. Notation. 1. GL n

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.qa] 20 Feb 2001

THE SHIMURA-TANIYAMA FORMULA AND p-divisible GROUPS

Coloured Kac-Moody algebras, Part I

Deformation of the `embedding'

370 INDEX AND NOTATION

Derivations and differentials

Ringel-Hall Algebras II

Dieudonné Modules and p-divisible Groups

Connecting Coinvariants

Geometric Realization and K-Theoretic Decomposition of C*-Algebras

Polynomial Hopf algebras in Algebra & Topology

5 Dedekind extensions

Takeuchi s Free Hopf Algebra Construction Revisited

Cartan A n series as Drinfeld doubles

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES.

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS JEROEN SIJSLING

Conformal blocks for a chiral algebra as quasi-coherent sheaf on Bun G.

NORMALIZATION OF THE KRICHEVER DATA. Motohico Mulase

1 Recall. Algebraic Groups Seminar Andrei Frimu Talk 4: Cartier Duality

Towards a modular functor from quantum higher Teichmüller theory

Combinatorial Dyson-Schwinger equations and systems I Feynma. Feynman graphs, rooted trees and combinatorial Dyson-Schwinger equations

INTRO TO TENSOR PRODUCTS MATH 250B

The Hitchin map, local to global

11. Dimension. 96 Andreas Gathmann

Convergence of Star Products and the Nuclear Weyl Algebr

Symplectic varieties and Poisson deformations

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 5

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III

MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12

Lectures on Quantum Groups

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013

p-divisible Groups and the Chromatic Filtration

Dieudonné modules, part I: a study of primitively generated Hopf algebras

ON COSTELLO S CONSTRUCTION OF THE WITTEN GENUS: L SPACES AND DG-MANIFOLDS

SCHUR-WEYL DUALITY FOR QUANTUM GROUPS

INFINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES FOR FROBENIUS KERNELS

The semantics of algebraic quantum mechanics and the role of model theory.

0.1 Spec of a monoid

BRAUER GROUPS 073W. This is a chapter of the Stacks Project, version 74eb6f76, compiled on May 29, 2018.

What is the Langlands program all about?

The Affine Grassmannian

COLOR LIE RINGS AND PBW DEFORMATIONS OF SKEW GROUP ALGEBRAS

LECTURE X: KOSZUL DUALITY

Quillen cohomology and Hochschild cohomology

LOCAL VS GLOBAL DEFINITION OF THE FUSION TENSOR PRODUCT

FOURIER - SATO TRANSFORM BRAID GROUP ACTIONS, AND FACTORIZABLE SHEAVES. Vadim Schechtman. Talk at

Symbol Index Group GermAnal Ring AbMonoid

De Rham Cohomology. Smooth singular cochains. (Hatcher, 2.1)

Lecture 3: Flat Morphisms

Endomorphism Rings of Abelian Varieties and their Representations

CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES

Finite group schemes

Quantizations and classical non-commutative non-associative algebras

Some algebraic properties of. compact topological groups

3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection

Poisson Manifolds Bihamiltonian Manifolds Bihamiltonian systems as Integrable systems Bihamiltonian structure as tool to find solutions

Hopf Algebras. Zajj Daugherty. March 6, 2012

Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 3 Due Friday, February 5 at 08:35

INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM LIE ALGEBRAS

LECTURE IV: PERFECT PRISMS AND PERFECTOID RINGS

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem

Modules With Only Finitely Many Direct Sum Decompositions up to Isomorphism

Del Pezzo surfaces and non-commutative geometry

Thus, the integral closure A i of A in F i is a finitely generated (and torsion-free) A-module. It is not a priori clear if the A i s are locally

BRIAN OSSERMAN. , let t be a coordinate for the line, and take θ = d. A differential form ω may be written as g(t)dt,

Vector Bundles on Algebraic Varieties

(1) A frac = b : a, b A, b 0. We can define addition and multiplication of fractions as we normally would. a b + c d

What is a quantum symmetry?

R_ -MATRICES, TRIANGULAR L_ -BIALGEBRAS, AND QUANTUM_ GROUPS. Denis Bashkirov and Alexander A. Voronov. IMA Preprint Series #2444.

Non characteristic finiteness theorems in crystalline cohomology

SEMINAR NOTES: QUANTIZATION OF HITCHIN S INTEGRABLE SYSTEM AND HECKE EIGENSHEAVES (SEPT. 8, 2009)

ABSTRACT NONSINGULAR CURVES

MULTIPLIER HOPF ALGEBRAS AND DUALITY

FALTINGS SEMINAR TALK. (rf)(a) = rf(a) = f(ra)

Transcription:

A global version of the quantum duality principle Fabio Gavarini Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata Dipartimento di Matematica Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, I-00133 Roma ITALY Received 22 August 2001 The quantum duality principle states that a quantization of a Lie bialgebra provides also a quantisation of the dual formal Poisson group and, conversely, a quantisation of a formal Poisson group yields a quantisation of the dual Lie bialgebra as well. We extend this to a much more general result: namely, for any principal ideal domain R and for each prime p R we establish an inner Galois correspondence on the category HA of torsionless Hopf algebras over R, using two functors from HA to itself such that the image of the first, resp. of the second, is the full subcategory of those Hopf algebras which are commutative, resp. cocommutative, modulo p i.e. they are quantum function algebras =QFA, resp. quantum universal enveloping algebras =QUEA, at p. In particular we provide a machine to get two quantum groups a QFA and a QUEA out of any Hopf algebra H over a field k : apply the functors to k[ν] k H for p = ν. A relevant example occurring in quantum electro-dynamics is studied in some detail. PACS: 02.20.Uw, 03.65.Fd Key words: Hopf algebras, Quantum Groups, Algebraic Methods in Quantum Mechanics 1 Introduction The quantum duality principle is known in literature in several formulations. One of these, due to Drinfeld [1], 7, and [2], states that any quantisation F h [[G]] of F [[G]] yields also a quantisation of Ug, and, conversely, any quantisation U h g of Ug provides a quantisation of F [[G ]]: here G, resp. g, is a Poisson group, resp. a Lie bialgebra, dual to G, resp. to g. Namely, Drinfeld defines two functors, inverse to each other, from the category of quantum enveloping algebras to the category of quantum formal series Hopf algebras and viceversa such that roughly U h g F h [[G ]] and F h [[G]] U h g. The global version of the above principle is an improvement of Drinfeld s result, which put it more in purely Hopf algebra theoretical terms and make it much more manageable. The general idea is the following. Quantisation of groups and Lie algebras is a matter of dealing with suitable Hopf algebras. Roughly, the classical Hopf algebras of interest are the commutative and the connected cocommutative ones: the first are function algebras of affine algebraic groups, the second are universal enveloping algebras of Lie algebras. A quantisation of such an object H 0 will be a Hopf algebra H depending on some parameter, say p, such that setting p = 0, i.e. taking the quotient H / p H, one gets back the original Hopf algebra H 0. When a quantisation H is given the classical object H 0 inherits an additional structure, that of a Poisson algebra, if H 0 = F [G], or that of a co-poisson algebra, if H 0 = Ug ; correspondingly, G is an affine Poisson group, g is a Lie bialgebra, and then also its dual space Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, Vol. 51 2001, No. 12, 1330 1335 1

Fabio Gavarini g is a Lie bialgebra; we ll denote by G any affine Poisson group with tangent Lie bialgebra g, and we say G is dual to G. In conclusion, one is lead to consider such quantum groups, namely p depending Hopf algebras which are either commutative modulo p or cocommutative modulo p. In detail, I focus on the category HA of all Hopf algebras which are torsion-free modules over a PID, say R ; the role of the quantisation parameter will be played by any prime element p R. For any such p, I introduce well-defined Drinfeld s-like functors from HA to itself, I show that their image is contained in a category of quantum groups quantised function algebras in one case, quantised enveloping algebras in the other and that when restricted to quantum groups these functors are inverse to each other and they exchange the type of the quantum group switching function to enveloping and the underlying group switching G to G. The global picture is much richer, giving indeed from the mathematical point of view sort of a inner Galois correspondence on HA. I wish to stress the fact that, compared with Drinfeld s result, mine is global in several respects. First, I deal with functors applying to general Hopf algebras not only quantum groups, i.e. I do not require them to be commutative up to specialisation or cocommutative up to specialisation. Second, I work with more global objects, namely algebraic Poisson groups rather than formal algebraic Poisson groups. Third, I do not require the geometric objects Poisson groups and Lie bialgebras to be finite dimensional. Fourth, the ground ring R is any PID, not necessarily k[[h]] as in Drinfeld s approach: therefore one may have several primes p R, and to each of them the machinery applies. In particular we have a method to get, out of any Hopf algebra over a PID, several quantum groups, namely two of them of both types for each prime p R. As an application, one can start from any Hopf algebra H over a field k and then take H x := k[x] k H, x being an indeterminate: this is a Hopf algebra over the PID k[x], to which Drinfeld s functors at any prime p k[x] may be applied to give quantum groups. In this note, I state the result and illustrate an application to a nice example occurring in the study of renormalisation of quantum electrodynamics. 2.1 The classical setting. 2 The global quantum duality principle Let k be a field of zero characteristic. We call affine algebraic group the maximal spectrum G := Hom k-alg H, k of any commutative Hopf k algebra H; then H is called the algebra of regular function on G, denoted with F [G]. We say that G is connected if F [G] has no non-trivial idempotents. We denote by m e the defining ideal of the unit element e G, and by m e2 the closure of m 2 e w.r.t. the weak topology; the cotangent space of G at e is g := m e /m e2, endowed with its weak topology; by g we mean the tangent space of G at e, realized as the topological dual g := g of g : this is the tangent Lie algebra of G. By Ug we mean the universal enveloping algebra of g: this is a connected cocommutative Hopf algebra, and there is a natural Hopf pairing between F [G] and Ug. Now assume G is a 2 Czech. J. Phys. 51 2001, 1330 1335

A global version of the quantum duality principle Poisson algebraic group: then g is a Lie bialgebra, Ug is a co-poisson Hopf algebra, F [G] is a Poisson Hopf algebra. Then g and g the topological dual of g w.r.t. the weak topology are topological Lie bialgebras too: in both cases, the Lie bracket is induced by the Poisson bracket of F [G], and the non-degenerate natural pairings g g k and g g k are compatible with these Lie bialgebra structures: so g and g or g are Lie bialgebras dual to each other. We let G be any connected algebraic Poisson group with tangent Lie bialgebra g, and say it is dual to G. 2.2 The quantum setting. Let R be a principal ideal domain, let QR be its quotient field, let p R be a fixed prime element and k p := R / p be the residue field, that we assume have zero characteristic. Let A the category of torsion-free R modules, and HA the subcategory of all Hopf algebras in A. Let A F the category of QR vector spaces, and HA F be the subcategory of all Hopf algebras in A F. For M A, set M F := QR R M, M p := M / p M = k p R M the specialisation of M at p = 0. For any H HA, let I H := ɛ 1 H p R : set I H := + n=0 I n H, H := + n=0 pn H. Given H in HA F, a subset H of H is called an R integer form of H if: a H is an R Hopf subalgebra of H ; b H is torsion-free as an R module hence H HA ; c H F := QR R H = H. Definition 2.1. Global quantum groups [or algebras] Fix a prime p R. a We call quantized universal enveloping algebra in short, QUEA any pair U, U such that U HA, U HA F, U is an R integer form of U, and U p := U / p U is isomorphic to the universal enveloping algebra of a Lie algebra. We denote by QUEA the subcategory of HA whose objects are all the QUEA s. b We call quantized function algebra in short, QFA any pair F, F such that F HA, F HA F, F is an R integer form of F, F = I F notation of 2.2 and F p := F / p F is isomorphic to the algebra of regular functions of a connected algebraic group. We call QFA the subcategory of HA of all QFA s. If U, U is a QUEA at p, then U p is a co-poisson Hopf algebra, so U p = Ug for g a Lie bialgebra; in this situation we shall write U = U p g, U = U p g. Similarly, if F, F is a QFA then F p is a Poisson Hopf algebra, so F p = F [G] for G a Poisson algebraic group: thus we shall write F = F p [G], F = F p [G]. 2.3 Drinfeld s functors [1], 7. Let H HA. Define n : H H n by 0 := ɛ, 1 := id H, and n := id n 2 H for every n > 2. Then set δ n := id H ɛ n n, for all n N. Set H := { a H δ n a p n H n n N } H, H := n 0 p n I n H H F. Theorem 2.1. The global quantum duality principle a H H and H H defines functors : HA HA and : HA HA, respectively, whose images lie in QFA and QUEA, respectively. b For all H HA, we have H H and H H. Moreover Czech. J. Phys. 51 2001, 1330 1335 3

Fabio Gavarini H = H H F, H QFA and H = H HF, H QUEA, thus we have induced functors : QUEA QFA, H, H H, H and : QFA QUEA, H, H H, H which are inverse to each other. c With notation of 1, we have U p g / p U p g = F [ G ], F p [G] / p F p [G] = Ug where the choice of the group G among all the connected algebraic Poisson groups with tangent Lie bialgebra g depends on the choice of the QUEA U p g, U p g. In short, if U p g, U p g is a QUEA for the Lie bialgebra g, then U p g, U p g is a QFA for the Poisson group G, and if F p [G], F p [G] is a QFA for the Poisson group G, then F p [G], F p [G] is a QUEA for the Lie bialgebra g. In particular, part c of the claim above shows that U p g may be thought of roughly as a quantum function algebra, as well as a quantum universal enveloping algebra, for at the same time it has an integer form which is a quantisation of a universal enveloping algebra and also an integer form which is a quantisation of a function algebra. Similarly, F p [G] may be seen as a quantum function algebra and as a quantum universal enveloping algebra. 3 Example: the global quantum duality principle in massless QED 3.1 Classical data. Let L = LN + be the free Lie algebra over C with countably many generators {x n } n N+, and U = UL its universal enveloping algebra; let V = V N + be the C vector space with basis {x n } n N+, and T = T V the tensor algebra of V. We shall use the canonical identifications UL = T V = C x 1, x 2,..., x n,... the unital C algebra of non-commutative polynomials in the x n s, L being the Lie subalgebra of U = T generated by {x n } n N+. Note also that UL has a standard Hopf algebra structure given by x = x 1 + 1 x, ɛx = 0, Sx = x for all x L, which is also determined by the same formulæ for x {x n } n N+ only. 3.2 The Hopf algebra of Brouder-Frabetti and its deformations. Let H dif be the complex Hopf algebra defined in [4], 5.1: as a C algebra it is simply H dif := C a 1, a 2,..., a n,..., and its Hopf algebra structure is given by a n = a n 1 + 1 a n + Sa n = a n m=1 S Q n m m m=1 Q n m m a a n m, ɛa n = 0 1 a a n m = a n m=1 Q n m m a Sa n m 2 4 Czech. J. Phys. 51 2001, 1330 1335

A global version of the quantum duality principle for all n N + where the latter formula gives the antipode by recursion. Hereafter P m k a := j 1,...,j k >0 a j1 a jk, Q l ma := m l+1 k k=1 k P m a m, k, l N +. j 1 + +j k =m The very definitions imply that mapping a n x n for all n yields an isomorphism H dif = UL of unital associative C algebras, but not of Hopf algebras. Now we build up quantum groups. Pick an indeterminate ν, and consider H dif [ν] := C[ν] C H dif = C[ν] a 1,..., a n,... : this is a Hopf C[ν] algebra, with Hopf structure given by 1 2 again; by construction, H dif [ν] HA. Set also H dif ν := Cν C[ν] H dif [ν] = Cν C H dif = Cν a 1,..., a n,..., a Hopf algebra over Cν. We consider H ν := H dif [ν] at p = ν and describe it explicitly. For all n N +, set x n := ν 1 a n : then H ν is the C[ν] subalgebra of H dif ν generated by the x n s, so H ν = C[ν] x 1, x 2,..., x n,.... Moreover, formulæ 1 2 give m n m + 1 x n = x n 1+1 x n + ν k k m=1 k=1 Sx n = x n m n m + 1 m=1 k=1 νk S P m k x x n m = k = x n m n m + 1 m=1 k=1 νk k for all n N + whence we see by hands that the following holds: P k m x x n m, ɛx n = 0 P k m x Sx n m Lemma 3.1. Formulæ above make H ν = C[ν] x 1, x 2,..., x n,... into a Hopf C[ν] subalgebra, embedded into H dif ν := Cν C H dif as a Hopf subalgebra. Moreover, H ν is a quantisation of H dif at ν 1, for its specialisation at ν = 1 is isomorphic to H dif, i.e. H 1 := H ν /ν 1 H ν = H dif via x n mod ν 1 H ν a n n N + as Hopf algebras over C. The previous result shows that H ν is a deformation of H dif, which is recovered as specialisation limit of H ν at ν = 1. The next result shows that H ν is also a deformation of UL, which is recovered as specialisation limit at ν = 0. Lemma 3.2. H ν is a quantized universal enveloping algebra at ν = 0. More precisely, the specialisation limit of H ν at ν = 0 is H 0 := H ν /ν H ν = UL via x n mod ν H ν x n n N +, thus inducing on UL the structure of co- Poisson Hopf algebra uniquely provided by the Lie bialgebra structure on L given by δx n = l=1 l + 1 x n l x l for all n N +, where a b := a b b a. Next, we can consider H ν, again at p = ν. By direct computation one finds Theorem 3.3. a Let x := ν x for all x H ν, and let [a, c] := a c c a. Then { H } / { ν = L = C[ν] bb [ bb1, b ] } b B b2 ν [bb1, b b2 ] b 1, b 2 B. Czech. J. Phys. 51 2001, 1330 1335 5

Fabio Gavarini: A global version of the quantum duality principle b H ν is a Hopf C[ν] subalgebra of H ν, and H dif is naturally embedded into H ν as a Hopf subalgebra via a n x n for all n N +. c H 0 := H ν / ν H ν = F [ G L ], where G L is an infinite dimensional connected Poisson algebraic group with cotangent Lie bialgebra isomorphic to L. 3.3 Specialisation limits. So far, I have already pointed out by Lemmas 3.1 2 and Theorem 3.3c the ν 1 following specialisation limits: H ν H dif ν 0 ν 0, H ν UL, H ν F [ G ] L. ν 1 In addition, Theorem 3.3a implies that H ν H dif as well. To summarize, H dif can be thought of as a deformation of UL, because we can see H ν as a one-parameter family of Hopf algebras linking UL = H 0 to H 1 = H dif. Similarly, H dif can also be seen as a deformation of F [ G ] L, in that H ν acts as a one-parameter family of Hopf algebras linking F [ G ] L = H 0 to H 1 = H dif. The two families match at the value ν = 1, corresponding in both families to the common element H dif. At a glance, we have UL = H 0 0 ν 1 H 1 = H dif = H 1 1 ν 0 H 0 = F [ G L ]. Note that the leftmost and the rightmost term above are Hopf algebras of classical type, having a very precise geometrical meaning: in particular, they both have a Poisson structure, arising as semiclassical limit of their deformation. Since H dif is intermediate between them, their geometrical meaning should shed some light on it. In turn, the physical meaning of H dif should have some reflect on the meaning of the semiclassical geometrical objects UL and F [ G L ]. Finally, I wish to stress that the discussion about this example applies to a much more general framework, namely to every Hopf C algebra H instead of H dif which is graded and is generated by a set of generators of positive degree. The author thanks the organizers of the X International Colloquium Quantum Groups and Integrable Systems for their kind invitation. References [1] V. G. Drinfeld: Proc. Intern. Congress of Math., Berkeley, 1986, Ed. AMS, 1987, pp. 798 820. [2] F. Gavarini: The quantum duality principle, preprint math.qa/9909071 1999, to appear in Annales de l Institut Fourier. [3] F. Gavarini: The global quantum duality principle: theory, examples, applications, preprint math.qa/0108015 2001. [4] C. Brouder and A. Frabetti, Noncommutative renormalization for massless QED, preprint hep-th/0011161 2000. 6 Czech. J. Phys. 51 2001