Interpretation of Reflection Seismic Data Acquired for Knight Hawk Coal, LLC

Similar documents
NUTC R367. Assessment of Active Karst Features in Proximity to Paved Roadways

UTC R189 GEOPHYSICAL ASSESSMENT OF KARST ACTIVITY. Neil L. Anderson

CENTER FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING STUDIES

UTC ETT160. Incorporation of Hands-on Experiments in an Introductory Structural Analysis Course

NUTC R296. Advanced Moisture Modeling of Polymer Composites. K. Chandrashekhara Curators Professor Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

UTC R161. Geotechnical Site Characterization of Transportation Construction Sites and Structures. Neil L. Anderson. Derek B. Apel.

Falling Weight Deflectometer vs Laboratory Determined Resilient Modulus (Slab Curling Study)

CENTER FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING STUDIES

Computer Aided Modeling of Soil Mix Designs to Predict Characteristics and Properties of Stabilized Road Bases

SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION OF RUN OFF ROAD CRASH LOCATIONS IN WISCONSIN FINAL REPORT

FUNDAMENTAL STUDIES OF THE CATALYTIC IGNITION PROCESS

Adapting Risk Management and Computational Intelligence Network Optimization Techniques to Improve Traffic Throughput and Tail Risk Analysis

MAPPING THE RAINFALL EVENT FOR STORMWATER QUALITY CONTROL

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT (03/lfi?lfibr-~/15/1998):

NUTC R360. Integrated Embedded Frequency Selective Surface Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring. August 2014

DRAFT. Evaluation of Joint Sealant Materials, US-36, Doniphan County, Kansas. Report No. FHWA-KS-08-2

PERMEABILITY CHANGES in SOIL DUE TO FILL LOADING and its EFFECT on the GROUNDWATER FLOW REGIME

AIRFOIL DESIGN PROCEDURE A MODIFIED THEODORSEN E-FUNCTION. by Raymond L. Barger. Langley Research Center NASA TECHNICAL NOTE NASA TN D-7741

Volume 6 Water Surface Profiles

CENTER FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING STUDIES

GEOPHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION IN SUPPORT OF HIGHWAY EXPANSION PROJECT

The Development of a Performance Specification for Granular Base and Subbase Material

Contractor Name and Address: Oxy USA, Inc. (Oxy), Midland, Texas OBJECTIVES

Upper Ocean Measurements of Water Masses and Circulation in the Japan Sea

Seismic Reflection Imaging across the Johnson Ranch, Valley County, Idaho

Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Ice-Albedo Feedback Processes in the Arctic Basin

Data Comparisons Y-12 West Tower Data

Prediction and Prevention of Tripped Rollovers

ANALYSIS OF LOCALIZED HIGH MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY ZONES AT JEFFERSON PROVING GROUND, INDIANA

Intercity Bus Stop Analysis

CanAlaska Ventures Ltd

Solar Radiation Alert System

A Geological and Geophysical Assessment of the Royal Center Gas Storage Field in North-Central Indiana, a Joint NIPSCO, DOE & GRI Case Study

CCR Rule Compliance: Innovative Use of Geophysics to Certify Landfill Stability and Site Groundwater Monitoring Wells

Fletcher Junction Project Technical Update December 18, 2008

Kelly Creek Basin. EXPLORATION UPDATE June 23, Reno Office 10 Greg Street, Suite 170 Sparks, Nevada

Technical Report Documentation Page

CFIRE. Exploratory Data Project: Freight Resiliency Performance Measures. CFIRE March 2010

Development and Validation of High-Resolution State Wind Resource Maps for the United States

Modeling Driver Behavior During Merge Maneuvers

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

A GPR ASSESSMENT OF THE PREHISTORIC NAPLES CANAL NAPLES, FLORIDA ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL CONSERVANCY, INC.

DOT/FAA/AM-17/8 Office of Aerospace Medicine Washington, DC Kyle Copeland

USER S GUIDE. ESTCP Project ER

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Report Title: Technical Progress on Project Entitled: 24-Channel Geophone Array for Horizontal or Vertical Boreholes

Engineering Geophysical Application to Mine Subsidence Risk Assessment

Cookbook for Rheological Models Asphalt Binders

Evaluation of Potential NEXRAD Dual Polarization Products

ION EXCHANGE SEPARATION OF PLUTONIUM AND GALLIUM (1) Resource and Inventory Requirements, (2) Waste, Emissions, and Effluent, and (3) Facility Size

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION. CORPS OF ENGINEERS P. 0. BOX 631 VICKSBURG. MISSISSIPPI 39180

KULTIWAVELENGTH LASER PROPAGATION STUDY ~ III. Quarterly Progress Report No. h March 16, June 15, J. Richard Kerr

CCR Surface Impoundment Location Restrictions Demonstration. MidAmerican Energy Company, Louisa Generating Station

PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT (06/16/1998-9/15/1998):

Quarterly Report April 1 - June 30, By: Shirley P. Dutton. Work Performed Under Contract No.: DE-FC22-95BC14936

A GPR ASSESSMENT OF THE NAPLES CANAL 8CR59: PHASE II NAPLES, FLORIDA ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL CONSERVANCY, INC.

Parametric Models of NIR Transmission and Reflectivity Spectra for Dyed Fabrics

A Career Mineral Exploration, Resource and Mining Geology

Mustafa Saribudak Environmental Geophysics Associates, 2000 Cullen Avenue, Number 7, Austin, TX, 78757, USA,

Seismic anisotropy in coal beds David Gray Veritas, Calgary, Canada

An Observational and Modeling Study of Air-Sea Fluxes at Very High Wind Speeds

Predicting Tropical Cyclone Formation and Structure Change

GEOL4714 Final Exam Fall 2005, C. H. Jones instructor

Dalradian Provides Update on Norwegian Exploration Programs

FINAL REPORT INTEGRATING P-WAVE AND S-WAVE SEISMIC DATA TO IMPROVE CHARACTERIZATION OF OIL RESERVOIRS. Innocent J. Aluka

Swash Zone Dynamics: Modeling and Data Analysis

Determine the Inside Wall Temperature of DSTs using an Infrared Temperature Sensor

Goldsource Completes Winter Drill Program At Border; 34 Holes Contain Aggregate Coal Intercepts Ranging From 10 to 100 Meters

Inside Wall Temperature Measurements of DSTs Using an Infrared Temperature Sensor

FHWA/IN/JTRP-2008/1. Final Report. Jon D. Fricker Maria Martchouk

GEOPHYSICAL IMAGING TO ENHANCE ANALYSIS, DESIGN AND DRILLING OF LARGE-SCALE GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS. Abstract

RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES AT THE CNS (Y-12 AND PANTEX) NUCLEAR DETECTION AND SENSOR TESTING CENTERS (NDSTC)

Interconversion of Dynamic Modulus to Creep Compliance and Relaxation Modulus: Numerical Modeling and Laboratory Validation

Ground-Water Exploration in the Worthington Area of Nobles County: Summary of Seismic Data and Recent Test Drilling Results

Large Epithermal Quartz Veins Found in Outcrop at Shot Rock, Nova Scotia; Dozens of Large Angular Boulders Suggest Extensive System

CRS Report for Congress

Slope Stability Evaluation Ground Anchor Construction Area White Point Landslide San Pedro District Los Angeles, California.

IMPROVED SYNTHESIS AND REACTION CHEMISTRY OF FN 3

Benefits of Force Limiting Vibration Testing

Licensed Science Officer Benchmark

AD-A FATION PAGE cmb No SUPPLEMENTARY NOTESlIII lllll II ili JUN PRICE CODE

ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY SURVEY OF INTREPID POTASH INJECTION WELL SITE: EDDY COUNTY, NEW MEXICO

Quantitation and Ratio Determination of Uranium Isotopes in Water and Soil Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)

Dynamics of Transport and Variability in the Denmark Strait Overflow

AD-AISS "3 IMPACT OF DETECTOR LOCATION AND ORIENTATION ERRORS ON in THE PERPENDICULAR METHOD AN INTRODUCTION(U) JET PROPULSION LAB PASADENA CA 03 OCT

NEWS RELEASE NOVEMBER 15, 2018 HANNAN COMPLETES DRILLING AT BALLYHICKEY, DEFINES SIGNIFICANT ZINC TARGET AT KILMURRY, CO.

Downtown Anchorage Seismic Risk Assessment & Land Use Regulations to Mitigate Seismic Risk

Identification of Lateral Spread Features in the Western New Madrid Seismic Zone J. David Rogers and Briget C. Doyle

J.H. Campbell Generating Facility Pond A - Location Restriction Certification Report

GEOLOGY AND SOILS. This chapter summarizes geologic and geotechnical aspects of the site as they relate to the Project.

Case study 2: Using seismic reflection to design a mine

Supplementary Figure 1. Distribution of seismic event locations determined using the final 3-D velocity model. We separate the crust-related

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-02/1863-1

Sabal Trail Pipeline Project Evaluation of Karst Topography and Sinkhole Potential for Pipeline and Facilities

Characterization of Geologic Anomalies Through Horizontal Directional Drilling

Closed-form and Numerical Reverberation and Propagation: Inclusion of Convergence Effects

ATTENUATION OF LG WAVES IN THE EASTERN TIBETAN PLATEAU. Jiakang Xie. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University

Transcription:

Interpretation of Reflection Seismic Data Acquired for Knight Hawk Coal, LLC by Neil Anderson Professor & Professional Geologist Missouri University of Science and Technology NUTC R256

Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s), who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program and the Center for Transportation Infrastructure and Safety NUTC program at the Missouri University of Science and Technology, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government and Center for Transportation Infrastructure and Safety assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. NUTC ###

Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NUTC R256 4. Title and Subtitle Interpretation of Reflection Seismic Data Acquired for Knight Hawk Coal, LLC 5. Report Date October 2011 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author/s 8. Performing Organization Report No. Neil Anderson, Professor & Professional Geologist Project #00027720 9. Performing Organization Name and Address Center for Transportation Infrastructure and Safety/NUTC program Missouri University of Science and Technology 220 Engineering Research Lab Rolla, MO 65409 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) 11. Contract or Grant No. DTRT06-G-0014 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Final 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract The Missouri University of Science and Technology geophysical crew acquired approximately 3000 lineal feet of reflection seismic data along five separate traverses (1-5) at the PEUG South mine site. The objective was to determine if any of the traverses overlie previously mined ground. 17. Key Words High-resolution reflection seismic, coal mining, subsidence 18. Distribution Statement No restrictions. This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161. 19. Security Classification (of this report) 20. Security Classification (of this page) 21. No. Of Pages 22. Price unclassified unclassified 10 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72)

Technical Report Entitled Interpretation of Reflection Seismic Data Acquired for Knight Hawk Coal, LLC Submitted by: Neil Anderson, Professor & Professional Geologist Missouri University of Science and Technology

Executive Summary: The interpretation of the acquired reflection seismic data suggests that the five traverses (shown in Figure 1) probably do not overly previously mined ground, with the possible exception of a segment of traverse 1 (stations 25+41 to 30+46; see Profile A; Figure 2). Discussion: The Missouri University of Science and Technology geophysical crew acquired approximately 3000 lineal feet of reflection seismic data along five separate traverses (1-5) at the PEUG South mine site (Figure 1). The objective was to determine if any of the traverses overlie previously mined ground. Figure 1: Plan view map showing location of five traverses (1-5) along which highresolution reflection seismic data were acquired. The edge of previously mined ground (as per available mine maps) is also shown. Seismic Profile A (Figure 2) was acquired along traverse 1 (Stations 25+41 to 30+46). As depicted in Figure 2, the time-depth to the refection from the top of bedrock (yellow line) appears to vary significantly across the seismic profile, being higher to the north and south than in the center. Such lateral variations in the depth to bedrock are typically associated with (and

often indicative of) irregular subsidence above previously mined ground. However, in my opinion, it is more likely that the time-structural relief observed along this profile at the bedrock level is due to natural causes (erosion). This interpretation is based on three observations: 1) traverse 1 parallels an existing stream; 2) bedrock is anomalously low over a distance of 250 ft; and 3) the reflection from the near-coal reflector (blue) almost parallels the bedrock event and is characterized by relatively uniform amplitudes. With respect to the last observation, I would anticipate seeing high amplitude reflections and diffractions from the top and base of mined out rooms on the seismic profile, if such rooms underlay traverse 1. In my opinion, if traverse 1 overlies previously mined ground, such ground would most probably be encountered by borehole placed at station 28+00. Figure 2: Seismic Profile A was acquired along traverse 1 (Stations 25+41 to 30+46). Two reflectors have been mapped on the seismic profile. The yellow-colored seismic event represents the top of bedrock; the blue-colored event represents a reflector in proximity to the coal layer (estimated depth of 100 ft). Seismic Profiles B, C and D (Figures 3, 4 and 5) were acquired along traverse 2 (Stations 11+92 to 25+41). As depicted in Figures 3, 4 and 5, the reflection from the top of bedrock (yellow line) does not vary significantly (in terms of apparent depth) across the three seismic profiles and is characterized everywhere by relatively uniform amplitudes. The reflection from the near-coal reflector (blue) almost parallels the bedrock event and is also characterized by relatively uniform

amplitudes. Perhaps most significantly, we do not see any high-amplitude reflections or diffractions in proximity to the blue-colored (near-coal) event. Such features would normally be observed if water- or air-filled voids were from the top and base of mined out rooms on the seismic profile, if such rooms underlay traverse 2. In my opinion, traverse 2 does not overly previously mined ground. Figure 3: Seismic Profile B was acquired along eastern segment of traverse 2 (Stations 11+92 to 25+41). Two reflectors have been mapped on the seismic profile. The yellowcolored seismic event represents the top of bedrock; the blue-colored event represents a reflector in proximity to the coal layer (estimated depth of 100 ft). Seismic Profile E (Figure 6) was acquired along traverse 3 (Stations 8+25 to 11+92). As depicted in Figure 6, the reflection from the top of bedrock (yellow line) does not vary significantly (in terms of apparent depth) across the three seismic profiles and is characterized everywhere by relatively uniform amplitudes. The reflection from the near-coal reflector (blue) almost parallels the bedrock event and is also characterized by relatively uniform amplitudes. Perhaps most significantly, we do not see any high-amplitude reflections or diffractions in proximity to the blue-colored event. Such features would normally be observed if water- or airfilled voids were from the top and base of mined out rooms on the seismic profile, if such rooms underlay traverse 3. In my opinion, traverse 3 does not overly previously mined ground.

Figure 4: Seismic Profile C was acquired along central segment of traverse 2 (Stations 11+92 to 25+41). Two reflectors have been mapped on the seismic profile. The yellowcolored seismic event represents the top of bedrock; the blue-colored event represents a reflector in proximity to the coal layer (estimated depth of 100 ft). Figure 5: Seismic Profile D was acquired along western segment of traverse 2 (Stations 11+92 to 25+41). Two reflectors have been mapped on the seismic profile. The yellow-colored seismic event represents the top of bedrock; the blue-colored event represents a reflector in proximity to the coal layer (estimated depth of 100 ft).

Figure 6: Seismic Profile E was acquired along traverse 3 (Stations 8+25 to 11+92). Two reflectors have been mapped on the seismic profile. The yellow-colored seismic event represents the top of bedrock; the blue-colored event represents a reflector in proximity to the coal layer (estimated depth of 100 ft). Seismic Profile F (Figure 7) was acquired along traverse 4 (Stations 6+02 to 8+25). As depicted in Figure 7, the reflection from the top of bedrock (yellow line) does not vary significantly (in terms of apparent depth) across the three seismic profiles and is characterized everywhere by relatively uniform amplitudes. The reflection from the near-coal reflector (blue) almost parallels the bedrock event and is also characterized by relatively uniform amplitudes. Perhaps most significantly, we do not see any high-amplitude reflections or diffractions in proximity to the blue-colored event. Such features would normally be observed if water- or air-filled voids were from the top and base of mined out rooms on the seismic profile, if such rooms underlay traverse 1. In my opinion, traverse 4 does not overly previously mined ground. Seismic Profile G (Figure 8) was acquired along traverse 5 (Stations 0+00 to 6+02). As depicted in Figure 8, the reflection from the top of bedrock (yellow line) does not vary significantly (in terms of apparent depth) across the three seismic profiles and is characterized everywhere by relatively uniform amplitudes. The reflection from the near-coal reflector (blue) almost parallels the bedrock event and is also characterized by relatively uniform amplitudes. Perhaps most significantly, we do not see any high-amplitude reflections or diffractions in proximity to the blue-colored event. Such features would normally be observed if water- or air-filled voids were from the top and base of mined out rooms on the seismic profile, if such rooms underlay traverse 1. In my opinion, traverse 5 does not overly previously mined ground.

Figure 7: Seismic Profile F was acquired along western segment of traverse 4 (Stations 6+02 to 8+25). Two reflectors have been mapped on the seismic profile. The yellow-colored seismic event represents the top of bedrock; the blue-colored event represents a reflector in proximity to the coal layer (estimated depth of 100 ft). Figure 8: Seismic Profile G was acquired along traverse 5 (Stations 8+25 to 11+92). Two reflectors have been mapped on the seismic profile. The yellow-colored seismic event represents the top of bedrock; the blue-colored event represents a reflector in proximity to the coal layer (estimated depth of 100 ft).