Mode of Feeding and Growth of Nephotettix virescens (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) on Selected Resistant and Susceptible Rice Varieties

Similar documents
Fiji disease resistance in sugarcane: Relationship to cultivar preference in field populations of the planthopper vector Perkinsiella saccharicida

Determination of Economic Threshold level (ETL) of brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens Stal. population in different stages of rice crop at Raipur

Levels of Resistance to the Whitebacked Planthopper, Sogatella furcifera (Homoptera: Delphacidae), in Rice Varieties with Different Resistance Genes 1

Brown planthopper: THREAT TO RICE PRODUCTION IN ASIA

Available online at ScienceDirect. Rice Science, 2016, 23(2):

6 2 Insects and plants

Parasitism of Brown Planthopper and Whitebacked Planthopper by Agamermis unka in Korea

Economic thresholds, nature of damage, and losses caused by the brown planthopper

REACTION OF RICE LANDRACES AGAINST BROWN PLANTHOPPER NILAPARVATA LUGENS STAL.

Identification of antibiosis and tolerance in rice varieties carrying brown planthopper resistance genes

Screening of Rice Genotypes for Resistance to the Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens Stål

Integrated Pest Management in rice

Studies of varietal resistance in rice to the brown planthopper at the International Rice Research Institute

Management Of Insect And Mite Vectors Of Vegetable Diseases

Investigating aphid resistance in. Lactuca sativa to Myzus persicae.

Ovicidal Activity of Insecticides Against Planthoppers 1 on Rice 2

Forewarning models of the insects of paddy crop

Unit D: Controlling Pests and Diseases in the Orchard. Lesson 5: Identify and Control Diseases in the Orchard

2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 1

Probing Behavior of Empoasca vitis (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) on Resistant and Susceptible Cultivars of Tea Plants

2016 Soybean Vein Necrosis Disease Survey

Phloem specific aphid resistance in Cucumis melo linear5:effectson feeding behaviour and performance of Aphis gossypii

Residual effect of two insecticides and neem oil against epilachna beetle, Epilachna vigintioctopunctata (Fab.) on bitter gourd

Evaluation of rice varieties for resistance to whitebacked planthopper, Sogatella furcifera (Horvath)

How Do I Get Rid Of Mealybugs?

Biophysical Basis of Resistance against Shoot Bug (Peregrinus maidis) in Different Genotypes of Rabi Sorghum

Photosynthesis and Translocation of Assimilates in Rice Plants Following Phloem Feeding by the Planthopper Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera: Delphacidae)

Functional response of the predators mirid bug and wolf spider against white-backed planthopper, Sogatella furcifera (Horvath)

Development of test methods and screening for resistance to thrips in Capsicum species

THE LIFE HISTORY AND CONSUMPTION HABITS OF CYRTORHINUS LIVIDIPENNIS REUTER (HEMIPTERA: MIRIDAE)l

Feeding Behavior Comparison of Soybean Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Biotypes on Different Soybean Genotypes

Unit G: Pest Management. Lesson 2: Managing Crop Diseases

Polymorphism of the Southern Green Stink Bug Nezara viridula Linnaeus, 1758 (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) In Vietnam

TYPES AND MECHANISMS. Course teacher Dr. A. Prabhuraj Professor Department of Entomology UAS, Raichur

Toxicity of Insecticides to Predators of Rice Brown Planthoppers~ Nilaparvata lugens (Stal) (Homoptera: Delphacidae)

Ent. exp. & appl. 12 (1969): North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam

HOST PREFERENCE AND LIFE CYCLE PARAMETERS OF CHROMATOMYA HORTICOLA GOUREAU (DIPTERA: AGROMYZIDAE) ON CANOLA CULTIVARS

Save My Exams! The Home of Revision For more awesome GCSE and A level resources, visit us at Transport in plants

Impact of Tobacco Thrips on Cowpea

Sharpshooter & Whiteflies: What s New in Ornamental Research

Varietal resistance to brown planthopper in India

SUSCEPTIBILITY OF PREDATORY STINK BUG Podisus nigrispinus (DALLAS) (HETEROPTERA: PENTATOMIDAE) TO GAMMA CYHALOTHRIN

SCREENING OF CARNATION VARIETIES AGAINST THRIPS, Thrips tabaci (LINDERMAN) IN PROTECTED CULTIVATION

Studies on varietal resistance to the brown planthopper in Taiwan

Part 1: /15 Part 2: /77 Part 3: /16 Part 4: /24.5

COVARIANCE ANALYSIS. Rajender Parsad and V.K. Gupta I.A.S.R.I., Library Avenue, New Delhi

Soybean stem fly outbreak in soybean crops

EVALUATION OF AVOCADO COLD HARDINESS

Model plants and their Role in genetic manipulation. Mitesh Shrestha

Characterization of electrical penetration graphs of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri,in sweet orange seedlings

Parasitic Diseases. Plants killing plants

Feeding Habits of Leatboppers

Effect of Weather Parameters on Population Dynamics of Paddy Pests

A.2. Identification of Insects

Abiotic Stress in Crop Plants

Welcome to the Iowa Certified Nursery Professional Training program Module 7: Introduction to Plant Diseases and Insects.

Biology of sweet potato weevil, Cylas formicarius F. on sweet potato

Aphids belong in the order Hemiptera and family

Redacted for Privacy

Seasonal incidence of major insect pests of okra in the north eastern hill region of India

Dectes Stem Borer: A Summertime Pest of Soybeans

Penetration into rice tissues by brown planthopper and fine structure of the salivary sheaths

Location of resistance factors in the leaves of potato and wild tuber-bearing Solanum species to the aphid Myzus persicae

Investigating San Jose scale in northwest Michigan sweet cherries

Interspecific ant competition over novel aphid resources and changes in plant chemistry. due to ant-aphid mutualisms on milkweed plants

Jie Chen 1), De-Run Huang 1), Lei Wang 1), Guang-Jie Liu 1,2) and Jie-Yun Zhuang* 1) Introduction

American Journal of Plant Biology. Performance of Brinjal (Solanum melongena) Genotypes through Genetic Variability Analysis

Breeding for resistance to planthoppers in rice

Key Words: conservation biology, insectary plants, cover crops, nectar, pollen, syrphids, biological control

Deterioration of Crop Varieties Causes and Maintenance

Frost Survival of Plants

FALL ARMYWORM! OVIPOSITION AND EGG DISTRIBUTION ON RICE

Mechanisms of resistance: a major gap in understanding planthopper-rice interactions

Relative Performance of Different Colour Laden Sticky Traps on the Attraction of Sucking Pests in Pomegranate

Invasive Species Test. 30 Stations 90 seconds each -or- 15 stations (2/seat) 3 minutes each

PEST AND DISEASE MANAGEMENT

Duelling aphids: electrical penetration graphs reveal the value of fighting for a feeding site

Tree and Shrub Insects

Supplementary Material. An analysis of the role of the ShSUT1 sucrose transporter in sugarcane using RNAi suppression

Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with resistance to brown planthopper in the indica rice cultivar Col.

Feeding Behavior of Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) and Response on Feeding Stimulants of Some Plants

Plant Structure and Growth

Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (TSWV) Information and Control Strategies

INSECTS AND PESTS OF AFRICAN VIOLETS By Mary Lou Harden

Effect of the age and planting area of tomato (Solanum licopersicum l.) seedlings for late field production on the physiological behavior of plants

Pulse Knowledge. Pea Aphid. Identification and Life Cycle. Host Crops and Crop Injury. Scouting and Economic Thresholds. Jennifer Bogdan, P.Ag.

Acoustic Emission Technique for the Detection of Abnormal Cavitation in Pine Trees Infected with Pine Wilt Disease

White flies and their natural enemies. Moshe cohen Bio-bee Sde Eliyahu Ltd. October 2015

EFFECTS OF SEED SIZE AND EMERGENCE TIME ON SUBSEQUENT GROWTH OF PERENNIAL RYEGRASS

Influence of Rice Genotypes on Folding and Spinning Behaviour of Leaffolder (Cnaphalocrocis medinalis) and Its Interaction with Leaf Damage

Minute Pirate Bug: A Beneficial Generalist Insect Predator

ESTIMATION OF GERMINATION POSSIBILITIES OF SOME PEAS STORAGES ACCESSIONS AND THE EVALUATION OF SOME QUALITATIVE INDICATORS ON ALBANIAN PLANT GENE BANK

Leaf and Stem Feeding Aphids

An Anatomical and Physiological Basis for Flood-Mediated Rice Blast Field Resistance

Behavioral evidence for local reduction of aphid-induced resistance

BIOL 305L Laboratory One

XEROPHYTES, HYDROPHYTES AND CULTIVATED PLANTS

Do we understand how pinewood nematode kills trees? Some hypotheses

Abstract. Introduction

Effect of Allelopathic weeds on Characteristics seed Growth in maize (Zea mays L. cv. KSC 704)

Transcription:

Mode of Feeding and Growth of Nephotettix virescens (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) on Selected Resistant and Susceptible Rice Varieties Z. R. KHAN AND R. C. SAXENA Department of Entomology, International Rice Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines J. Econ. Entomol. 78: 583-587 (1985) ABSTRACT The feeding activity of a leafhopper, Nephotettix virescens (Distant), on nine genetically diverse rice varieties was monitored with an electronic recording device. The varieties tested were the leafhopper resistant 'Pankhari 203' (Glh 1), 'ASD7' (Glh 2), 'IR8' (Glh 3), 'Ptb 8' (glh 4), 'ASD8' (Glh 5), 'IR36' (Glh 6), 'Moddai Karuppan' (Glh 7), the highly resistant 'IR29' (resistance gene not identified), and the susceptible 'Taichung Native l' (TN1) (no resistance gene). Distinct differences in waveforms for probing, salivation, phloem feeding, and xylem drinking were recorded on resistant and susceptible rice plants. The waveforms indicated that the insect fed primarily from the phloem of susceptible 'TNl' plants, but switched to the xylem on resistant varieties. N. virescens made a significantly higher number of brief and repeated probes on resistant varieties than on susceptible 'TN}' plants. However, differences in the mean duration of salivation on resistant and susceptible varieties were not associated with resistance. Bulk seedling screening of the test varieties and the insect's growth on them were used as criteria for evaluation of resistance to N. virescens for comparison with results of electronic recording. Nephotettix virescens (Distant) is a doubly destructive leafhopper pest of rice in tropical Asia. The insect causes direct damage to the rice plant by sucking the sap from vascular tissues; it causes indirect damage by transmitting a number of virus diseases including the rice tungro virus during feeding. This pest has caused heavy crop losses throughout south and southeast Asia. Incorporation of resistance to N. virescens is an important objective of the rice improvement programs at the International Rice Research Institute. Of 48,000 rice varieties and accessions from all over the world that have been screened, about 2,000 have shown potential for resistance to this pest (Heinrichs et al. 1985). Resistance to the vector, however, cannot always be correlated with resistance to the virus. For example, 'IR8' is moderately resistant to the leafhopper, but susceptible to tungro virus (Ling 1972, Rapusas and Heinrichs 1982). Recently, the most popular rice variety, 'IR36,' that is planted in almost 11 million ha all over the world (International Rice Research Institute 1982), has succumbed to the rice tungro virus in a few locations in the Philippines. N. virescens primarily feeds through the phloem on susceptible varieties, but has been found to switch to xylem drinking on resistant varieties (Auclair et al. 1982, Khan and Saxena 1984a). The rice tungro virus is phloem-specific. Even in plants showing severe disease symptoms, the virus particles are not detectable in the mesophyll or the xylem tissue (Favali et al. 1975). Consequently, if the leafhopper feeds less in the phloem, the chances of its acquiring or transmitting the virus are considerably reduced. Knowledge of the mode of N. virescens feeding on the rice plant is, therefore, useful in evaluating rice germ plasm for resistance to this pest and its transmitted virus diseases. However, studies involving homopteran feeding are particularly difficult because plant penetration by mouthparts, and subsequent salivation and ingestion, all occur within plant tissues (Triplehorn et al. 1984). McLean and Kinsey (1964, 1968) developed an electronic monitoring system for recording feeding behavior of sucking insects and correlated the waveform patterns with various phases of feeding, i.e., probing, salivation, and ingestion. Khan and Saxena (1984b) described a DC variant of the electronic recording system. In the study reported here, we used the DC recording system to investigate the feeding activity of N. virescens on nine rice varieties with diverse genes for resistance to the leafhopper. We made parallel observations on damage ratings of the test varieties by means of a free-choice bulk seedling screening method (Saxena and Khan 1984), and on insect growth on those varieties. Materials and Methods A virus-free colony of N. virescens was maintained in the insectary on 30- to 40-day-old healthy plants of leafhopper-susceptible 'Taichung Native l' (TN 1) rice variety. The varieties tested were the resistant 'Pankhari 203' (elk 1), 'ASD7' (elk 2), 'IR8' (elk 3), 'Ptb 8' (glh 4), 'ASD8' (elh 5), 'IR36' 583

584 JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 78, no. 3 (Glh 6), 'Moddai Karuppan' (Glh 7), the highly resistant '1R29' (resistance gene not identified), and the susceptible check 'TNl' (no resistance gene). Feeding Behavior on Resistant Varieties. To determine N. virescens feeding activity, a 5-cmlong, 18 ~m gold wire (Tanaka Denshi, Kogyo, K.K., Tokyo) was attached to the dorsum of a nonviruliferous, 8- to lo-h-old female by means of silver paint (Litsilber 200, Demetron, Hanau, W. Germany). The insect was starved but water-satiated for 2 h and then placed on an intact leaf blade of a 30-day-old susceptible or resistant rice plant. The gold wire was connected directly to the negative input terminal of a transistorized, automatic, and null-balancing DC chart recorder having 250-mm recording width and input resistance of 1 Mfl (Unicorder, Pantos, Nippon Denshi, Kagaku, Japan). The voltage source consisted of two 1.5-V DC batteries connected in series. The positive battery terminal was connected with the plant roots through moistened filter paper and aluminum foil. The negative battery terminal was connected directly to the positive input terminal of the chart recorder. The recorder pen was adjusted to the chart baseline and insect feeding was monitored for 180 min. A chart speed of 1.5 cm/min at 500-m V amplifier power was adequate for distinguishing various voltage reversals during insect feeding. Each variety was tested 10 times using 10 new plants and 10 new insects. All recordings were done at 27 ± 2 C and 65 to 70% RH. Waveforms recorded during N. virescens feeding were compared and interpreted according to Chang's (1978) identification of waveform patterns associated with the feeding behavior of the sugarcane leafhopper, Perkinsiella saccharicida Kirkaldy. Voltage signals in xylem drinking were stronger than those in phloem feeding. Bulk Seedling Test. For bulk seedling screening, all nine test varieties were seeded in 40-cmlong rows in wooden trays (60 by 45 by 10 cm) in a greenhouse. One week after germination, the seedlings in each tray were thinned to 15 per row and placed inside screen cages (55 cm long, 40 cm wide, and 50 cm high). The seedlings were infested uniformly with five second-instar N. virescens nymphs per seedling. Seedling damage, based on individual seedling score (International Rice Research Institute 1980), was graded as soon as the susceptible check 'TNl' variety was killed. Treatments were replicated five times in a randomized complete block design. Nymphal Growth and Development. Thirtyday-old, virus-free plants of the test varieties, grown separately in clay pots, were covered with mylar cages (90 cm high, 10 cm diam) and arranged in a randomized complete block design in a waterfilled iron tray in the insectary. The room temperature was maintained at 27 ± 1 C with 65 to 70% RH and a LD 12:12 photoperiod. Each plant was infested with 10 first-instar nymphs. Each treatment was replicated four times. Insect growth was measured in terms of the number of nymphs that became adults and the time taken to reach the adult stage. A growth index was calculated as a ratio of the percentage of nymphs becoming adults to the mean growth period in days (Saxena et al. 1974). The higher the growth index, the more suitable was the variety for N. virescens nymphal growth. Data of the experiments on N. virescens feeding behavior, bulk seedling test, and nymphal growth were subjected to an analysis of variance, and means were compared with Duncan's (1951) multiple range test at the P < 0.05 level. Results Distinct waveform patterns for probing, salivation, phloem ingestion, and xylem ingestion (Fig. 1) were recorded during N. virescens feeding on the resistant and susceptible rice varieties (Table 1). Susceptible and resistant varieties differed in each of the events analyzed. The most notable difference in insect feeding behavior on susceptible and resistant plants was in the duration of phloem feeding and xylem drinking. The mean duration of phloem feeding on the susceptible 'TNl' (31.8 min) was significantly longer than that on resistant varieties. No phloem ingestion was recorded on resistant '1R29.' Correspondingly, the mean duration of xylem drinking was significantly shorter on 'TN l' plants than on resistant ones. Another indication of resistance was the significantly higher mean number of separate probes by N. virescens during feeding on resistant plants than on susceptible 'TNl.' The highest probing activity (122 mean number of probes) was on '1R36.' Differences in the mean durations of salivation on susceptible and resistant varieties were not associated with resistance. For instance, although the mean salivation period was shortest for N. virescens feeding on susceptible 'TNI' plants (13.2 min) and longest on resistant 'IR36' (30.3 min) and 'ASD7' (23.5 min) plants, the mean duration of salivation of the insect on susceptible 'TN I' and resistant 'Ptb8' (13.5 min) and 'IR29' (16.6 min) did not differ significantly. In bulk seedling screening (Table 1), 'Moddai Karuppan' and 'Ptb 8' had resistance scores of 3.3 and 3.7, respectively, followed in order of decreasing resistance by 'IR29,' 'Pankhari 203,' 'ASD7,' '1R8,' and 'ASD8.' The score of 6.1 for '1R36' indicated moderate susceptibility to N. virescens. Despite significant differences in resistance scores of the test varieties, nymphal growth (as indicated by percentages of nymphs that became adults) on resistant 'Moddai Karuppan,' 'Ptb 8,' and '1R36' was as high as on susceptible 'TNl' (Table 2). However, significantly fewer nymphs reached adult stage on resistant varieties 'ASD7,' 'ASD8,' 'IR8,' 'IR29,' and 'Pankhari 203.' The growth period was shortest (13.8 days) on 'TNl' plants, followed by that on 'Ptb 8' (15.4 days) and 'Moddai

June 1985 KHAN AND SAXENA: N. virescens ON RESISTANT RICES 585 P PpRP S P P P R S S S Xi C9 P-Probe S -Solivation Pi-Phloem ingestion Xi- Xylem ingestion R -Rest.. 40 seconds (Right to left) o Pi Fig. 1. Waveforms recorded during N. vtrescens feeding on susceptible TNl (a-c) and resistant 'Pankhari 203' (d-f) rice varieties, using an electronic monitoring device. Karuppan' (16.1 days), but it was significantly longer by 6 to 10 days on other resistant varieties. The growth index was highest in 'TN1,' followed by that in 'Moddai Karuppan' and 'Ptb 8'; the other rice varieties were less suitable for N. virescens growth and development. Discussion The feeding of N. virescens on resistant rice varieties was characterized by reduced periods of phloem feeding and a corresponding increase in the frequency of probing and xylem drinking. A significantly greater number of feeding punctures made by N. virescens females on resistant varieties compared to susceptible varieties was also recorded by Rezaul-Karim (1978). Likewise, increased probing and reduced phloem feeding on resistant cultivars and non host plants has been reported in other leafhoppers such as Perkinsiella vitiensis Kirkaldy and P. saccharicida (Chang and Ota 1978), and Graminiella nigrifrons (Forbes) (Triplehorn et al. 1984). Causes of the shift from phloem feeding to xylem drinking on resistant rices are not well understood. The existence of a physical barrier that suppresses phloem feeding in or around the vascular tissue in the resistant varieties is unlike Iy. Ling (1968) demonstrated that the sclerenchyma cap on the abaxial side of the vascular bundle in a cross section of the resistant 'Pankhari 203' leaf sheath was not wide enough to prevent N. virescens stylets from reaching the vascular bundle. Auclair et al. (1982) speculated that differences in feeding were due to either the presence of a feeding deterrent in tissues adjacent to or within sieve elements of resistant plants or formation of callose or slime plugs in phloem in response to N. virescens probing. Rice plant volatile chemicals may also play an important role in resistance. Application

586 JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 78, no. 3 Table 1. Means of electronically recorded events during 180-min feeding by N, virescens on selected resistant and susceptible rice varieties Electronically recorded events" Variety Probes Salivation Xylem drinking Phloem feeding Tungro disease ratingb (no.) (min) (min) (min) 'IR 29' 71b 16.6cd 25.0abcd O.Oe Intermediate (1) 'ASD7' 108a 23.5b 21.6cd 0.4e I 'Pankhari 203' 78b 20.6bc 33.7a 0.7de I 'IR 36' 122a 30.3a 30.4ab 1.3cde Susceptible (S) 'IR 8' Illa 21.5b 19.5d l.6cde S 'ptb 8' l09a 13.5d 27.2abc 3.3bcd SC 'Moddai Karuppan' l09a 19.8bc 21.8bcd 4.obc S 'ASD8' 8lb 20.lbc 19.900 6.0b I 'TNl' (susceptible check) 25c 13.2d 1l.Oe 31.8a S In a column, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05; Duncan's [1951] multiple range test). "Average of 10 replications, each replication using a new insect and a new plant. b Tungro disease rating from International Rice Research Institute greenhouse, provided by H. Hibino, virologist. C From Heinrichs and Rapusas (1983). of steam distillate extracts of the resistant 'ASD7' to susceptible 'TN l' plants disrupted the insect's normal feeding-i.e., reduced phloem feeding and increased xylem drinking (Khan and Saxena 1985). Among the nine test varieties that we tested, phloem feeding was not recorded on 'IR29,' and was extremely low on 'ASD7' and 'Pankhari 203' plants. These varieties were also resistant to both the vector and the tungro virus. Low phloem intake from these varieties was also reflected in poor growth of N. virescens nymphs. High mortality and slow growth of N. virescens nymphs on 'ASD7' and 'Pankhari 203' plants were also reported by Cheng and Pathak (1972). Despite reduced phloem feeding on 'IR8' and 'IR36,' 70 to 75% leafhopper nymphs became adults. However, the much longer developmental period on these varieties can be ascribed to feeding on xylem sap of lower nutritive value. 'IR8' is moderately resistant while 'IR36' is moderately susceptible to the vector, but both are susceptible to the virus. Similar reactions of 'IR8' and 'IR36' to the vector and the virus have been reported by Rapusas and Heinrichs (1981, 1982). Among the resistant varieties, phloem feeding by N. virescens was longer on 'ASD8,' 'Moddai Karuppan,' and 'Ptb 8.' In spite of substantial feeding from the phloem, 'Moddai Karuppan' and 'Ptb 8' were rated as resistant to the leafhopper in the bulk seedling screening test. The comparability of the growth indices of the leafhopper on varieties 'Moddai Karuppan' and 'Ptb 8' to that on susceptible 'TN1' indicates a possible tolerance of 'Moddai Karuppan' and 'Ptb 8' for N. virescens feeding. However, the two varieties are susceptible to the tungro virus (Heinrichs and Rapusas 1983). A somewhat higher damage score for 'ASD8' was reflected in a correspondingly high phloem intake. Causes of the insect's poor growth on 'ASD8' and resistance to tungro virus are presently unknown. Our findings show that electronic monitoring of insect feeding activity can be a useful and convenient adjunct to other methods for screening host plant resistance to the vector and the transmitted diseases. In N. virescens feeding, phloem ingestion should be considered as the key criterion in evaluating resistance to the vector and the tungro virus. For example, on 'IR29,' which derives its high Table 2. Growth of N. virescens nymphs on susceptible and resistant rice plants Variety Nymphs becoming Developmental Phloem feedingh Insect damage Growth index" adults (%) period (days) (min) rating< 'IR 29' 8e 21.5a 0.7d O.Oe 3.8bc 'ASD7' loe 22.0a 0.5d O.4e 4.7bc 'Pankhari 203' 48cd 23.6a 2.0cd 0.7de 4.0bc 'IR 36' 75abc 22.7a 3.3b 1.3cde 6.Ib 'IR 8' 70bc 23.9a 2.9bc 1.6cde 4.8bc 'Ptb 8' 88ab 15.4b 5.6a 3.3bOO 3.7c 'Moddai Karuppan 98a 16.1b 6.1b 4.0bc 3.3c 'ASD8' 28de 23.5a 1.2d 6.0b 5.lbc 'TN!' (susceptible check) 93ab 13.8b 6.7a 31.8a 9.0a In a column, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05; Duncan's [1951] multiple range test). Average of four replications, each replication with 10 first-instar nymphs. " Growth index = percentage of nymphs becoming adult divided by mean developmental period (days). b From Table 1. c Average of five replications, scored On a 0-9 scale: 0, highly resistant; 9, highly susceptible (International Rice Research Institute 1980).

June 1985 KHAN AND SAXENA: N. virescens ON RESISTANT RICES 587 level of resistance from 'Gam Pai,' a Thai variety, the insect was not able to feed at all on the phloem. Hence, 'IR29' proved to be highly resistant. Other sibling varieties of the same origin (e.g., 'IR28' and 'IR34') also have high levels of resistance to both N. virescens and the tungro virus (Rapusas and Heinrichs 1982) Acknowledgment This paper reports a part of collaborative research with the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya. References Cited Auclair, J, L" E. Baldos, and E. A. Heinrichs. 1982. Biochemical evidence for the feeding sites of the leafhopper Nephotettix virescens within susceptible and resistant rice plants. Insect Sci. Appl. 3: 29-34. Chang, V. C. S. 1978. Feeding activities of the sugarcane leafhopper: identification of electronically recorded waveforms. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 71: 31-36. Chang, V. C. S., and A. K. 018. 1978. Feeding activities of Perkinsiella leafhoppers and Fiji disease resistance of sugarcane. J. Econ. Entomol. 71: 297-300. Cheng, C. H., and M. D. Pathak. 1972. Resistance of Nephotettix virescens in rice varieties. Ibid. 65: 1149-1153. Duncan, D. B. 1951. A significance test for difference between ranked treatments in an analysis of variance. Va. J. Sci. 2: 171-189. Favali, M. A., S. Pellegrini, and M. Bassi. 1975. Ultrastructural alterations induced by tungro virus in rice leaves. Virology 66: 502-507. Heinrichs, E. A., and H. R. Rapusas. 1983. Correlation of resistance to the green leafhopper, Nephotettix virescens (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) with tungro virus infection in rice varieties having different genes for resistance. Environ. Entomol. 12: 201-205. Heinrichs, E. A., F. G. Medrano, and H. R. Rapusas. 1985. Genetic evaluation for insect resistance in rice. International Rice Research Institute, Laguna, Philippines. International Rice Research Institute. 1980. Standard evaluation system for rice, international rice testing program. International Rice Research Institute, Laguna, Philippines. 1982. IR36-the world's most popular rice. International Rice Research Institute, Laguna, Philippines. Khan, Z. R., and R. C. Saxena. 1984a. Technique for demonstrating phloem or xylem feeding by leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) and planthoppers (Homoptera: Delphacidae) in rice plant. J. Econ. Entomol. 77: 550-552. 1984b. Electronically recorded waveforms associated with the feeding behavior of Sogatella furcifera (Homoptera: Delphacidae) on susceptible and resistant rice varieties. Ibid. 77: 1479-1482. 1985. Effect of steam distillate extract of a resistant rice variety on feeding behavior of Nephotettix virescens (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Ibid. 78: 562-566. Ling, K. C. 1968. Mechanism of tungro-resistance in rice variety Pankhari 203. Philippine Phytopathol. 4: 21-38. 1972. Rice virus diseases. International Rice Research Institute, Laguna, Philippines. McLean, D. L., and M. G. Kinsey. 1964. A technique for electronically recording aphid feeding and salivation. Nature (London) 202: 1358-1359. 1968. Probing behavior of pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum II. Comparisons of salivation and ingestion in host and non host plant leaves. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 61: 730-739. Rapusas, H. R., and E. A. Heinrichs. 1981. Green leafhopper resistance and tungro infection in IR varieties. Int. Rice Res. Newsl. 6: 7-8. 1982. Plant age and levels of resistance to green leafhopper, Nephotettix virescens (Distant), and tungro virus in rice varieties. Crop Prot. 1: 91-98. Rezaul-Karim, A. N. M. 1978. Varietal resistance of rice to green leafhopper, Nephotettix virescens (Distant): sources, mechanisms, and genetics of resistance. Ph.D. dissertation, University of the Philippines, Los Banos. Saxena, R. C., and Z. R. Khan. 1984. Comparison between free-choice and no-choice seedling bulk tests for evaluating resistance of rice varieties to the whitebacked planthopper. Crop Sci. 24: 1204-1206. Saxena, K. N., J. R. Gandhi, and R. C. Saxena. 1974. Patterns of relationship between certain leafhoppers and plants. Part I. Responses to plants. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 17: 303-318. Triplehorn, B. W., L. R. Nault, and D. J. Horn. 1984. Feeding behavior of Graminella nigrifons (Forbes). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 77: 102-107. Received for publication 10 October 1984; accepted 2 February 1985.