arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 30 Nov 2005

Similar documents
Distinguishing magnetic moment from oscillation solutions of the solar neutrino problem with Borexino

Recent development in Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics LNGS, September 4-7, 2017

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 18 Sep 2002

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 20 Oct 2005

Review of Solar Neutrinos. Alan Poon Institute for Nuclear and Particle Astrophysics & Nuclear Science Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 14 Jan 1993

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 9 Feb 2006

4p 4 He + 2e + +2ν e. (1)

Solar Neutrino Road Map. Carlos Pena Garay IAS

Neutrino Oscillations

Solar Neutrinos & MSW Effect. Pouya Bakhti General Seminar Course Nov IPM

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 22 Jan 2009

Solar Neutrinos: Status and Prospects. Marianne Göger-Neff

Solar spectrum. Nuclear burning in the sun produce Heat, Luminosity and Neutrinos. pp neutrinos < 0.4 MeV

SOLAR NEUTRINOS REVIEW Revised December 2007 by K. Nakamura (KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Japan).

Status of Solar Neutrino Oscillations

Neutrino oscillation experiments: Recent results and implications

What can be learned by measuring the fluxes of the 7 Be and the pep solar neutrino lines?

Metallicities in stars - what solar neutrinos can do

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 10 Mar 2001

hep-ph/ Oct 1994

Search for Sterile Neutrinos with the Borexino Detector

WHY DO SOLAR NEUTRINO EXPERIMENTS BELOW 1 MEV? a

Detection of MeV scale neutrinos and the solar energy paradigm

TIME-FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF GALLEX AND GNO SOLAR NEUTRINO DATA: EVIDENCE SUGGESTIVE OF ASYMMETRIC AND VARIABLE NUCLEAR BURNING P.A.

LOW ENERGY SOLAR NEUTRINOS WITH BOREXINO. Lea Di Noto on behalf of the Borexino collaboration

14-th Lomonosov conference on elementary particle physics Moscow, August 19-25,2009 BNO INR V.N. Gavrin. The Solar Neutrinos

Where do we stand with solar neutrino oscillations?

Results from Borexino 26th Rencontres de Blois

Neutrino Oscillations

Sterile Neutrinos & Neutral Current Scattering

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 2 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

KamLAND Data and the Solution to the Solar Neutrino Problem

Recent advances in neutrino astrophysics. Cristina VOLPE (AstroParticule et Cosmologie APC, Paris)

Solar Neutrinos: Solved and Unsolved Problems

Relations between the SNO and the Super Kamiokande solar. Waikwok Kwong and S. P. Rosen

Low-energy Anti-neutrinos from the Sun

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 16 May 1997

Hint of CPT Violation in Short-Baseline Electron Neutrino Disappearance

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 4 Dec 1998

LENS Prototyping Status Report

The Variation of the Solar Neutrino Fluxes over Time in the Homestake, GALLEX(GNO) and Super-Kamiokande Experiments

arxiv:hep-ph/ v6 23 Jun 2005

Solar neutrinos and the MSW effect

UNIT1: Experimental Evidences of Neutrino Oscillation Atmospheric and Solar Neutrinos

Sterile Neutrinos in July 2010

Can Neutrinos Decay?

Measuri g the low energy neutrino spectrum with the LENS experiment

Review of Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

Solar Neutrino and Neutrino Physics in Brazil

Solar Neutrinos in Large Liquid Scintillator Detectors

Wave Packet Description of Neutrino Oscillation in a Progenitor Star Supernova Environment

No Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein Effect in Maximal Mixing arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 26 Jan 1996

Precision Measurement of the Low Energy Solar Neutrino Spectrum with the LENS Experiment Mark Pitt * Virginia Tech for the LENS Collaboration

Neutrino Physics: an Introduction

Li in a WbLS Detector

Hydrogen Burning in More Massive Stars and The Sun.

The Solar Neutrino Problem. There are 6 major and 2 minor neutrino producing reactions in the sun. The major reactions are

Neutrinos from the Sun and other sources: Results from the Borexino experiment

Non-Standard Interaction of Solar Neutrinos in Dark Matter Detectors

DFTT 61/98 hep-ph/ October 6, 1998 Is bi-maximal mixing compatible with the large angle MSW solution of the solar neutrino problem? C. Giunti I

Past, Present, and Future of Solar Neutrino Physics

Solar Neutrino Oscillations

Recent results and status of the

Hydrogen Burning in More Massive Stars.

Neutrino Oscillations And Sterile Neutrinos

Borexino Source Experiment

Proton decay and neutrino astrophysics with the future LENA detector

Carlo Giunti. CERN Particle and Astro-Particle Physics Seminar. work in collaboration with Mario Acero Marco Laveder Walter Winter

Oklahoma State University. Solar Neutrinos and their Detection Techniques. S.A.Saad. Department of Physics

Low Energy Neutrino Astronomy and Results from BOREXINO

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 8 Feb 2000

MINOS Result. The ND analysis predicts: events in the Far Detector 54 observed, 0.7σ excess. 49.1±7.0(stat.)±2.7(syst.

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 4 Jan 2002

192 days of Borexino. Neutrino 2008 Christchurch, New Zeland May 26, Cristiano Galbiati on behalf of Borexino Collaboration

The future of neutrino physics (at accelerators)

AN INTRODUCTION TO SOLAR NEUTRINO RESEARCH

LONG BASELINE NEUTRINO OSCILLATION EXPERIMENTS

ν?? Solar & Atmospheric Oscillation Experiments Greg Sullivan University of Maryland Aspen Winter Conference January 21, 1999 )Past )Present )Future

SOLAR NEUTRINO EXPERIMENTS: STATUS AND PROSPECTS M. C. Chen

Does the Sun appear brighter at night in neutrinos?

The SOX experiment. Stefano Davini (on behalf of the Borexino-SOX collaboration) Brussels, December 1 st 2017

PLAN. Lecture I: Lecture II: Neutrino oscillations and the discovery of neutrino masses and mixings. Lecture III: The quest for leptonic CP violation

Radiation and the Atom

Neutrino Oscillation Measurements, Past and Present. Art McDonald Queen s University And SNOLAB

PoS(HEP2005)177. Status of the OPERA experiment. Francesco Di Capua. Universita Federico II and INFN.

ECT Lecture 2. - Reactor Antineutrino Detection - The Discovery of Neutrinos. Thierry Lasserre (Saclay)

Optimization of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters Using Differential Evolution

Phenomenology of neutrino mixing in vacuum and matter

Neutrino Oscillations

Neutrino mixing II. Can ν e ν µ ν τ? If this happens:

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 30 Mar 2000

Low-energy Anti-neutrinos from the Sun

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 30 Jul 1998

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 8 Sep 2000

Lehrstuhl E 15 Institut für Astro-Teilchenphysik Fakultät für Physik Technische Universität München Prof. Dr. Franz von Feilitzsch

Solar Neutrinos and the Borexino experiment

11 Neutrino astronomy. introduc)on to Astrophysics, C. Bertulani, Texas A&M-Commerce 1

1. Neutrino Oscillations

Jarek Nowak University of Minnesota. High Energy seminar, University of Virginia

Transcription:

hep-ph/0511341 Solar Neutrinos: Spin Flavour Precession and LMA arxiv:hep-ph/0511341v1 30 Nov 2005 João Pulido, Bhag C. Chauhan CENTRO DE FÍSICA TEÓRICA DAS PARTÍCULAS (CFTP) Departamento de Física, Instituto Superior Técnico Av. Rovisco Pais, P-1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal and R. S. Raghavan Department of Physics Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) Blacksburg VA 24060 USA Abstract Thetimedependencethatappearstobehintedbythedatafromthefirst13yearsof the solar neutrino Gallium experiments is viewed as resulting from a partial conversion of active neutrinos to light sterile ones through the resonant interaction between the magnetic moment of the neutrino and a varying solar field. A summary of the model and its predictions are presented for the forthcoming experiments Borexino and LENS. On leave from Govt. Degree College, Karsog (H P) India 171304. E-mail: chauhan@cftp.ist.utl.pt E-mail: raghavan@vt.edu

1. After LMA has been ascertained as the dominant solution to the solar neutrino problem, the next step in solar neutrino experiments will be the search for time variations of the active flux. Such an effect remains much of an open question because so far most analyses have relied on time averaged solar neutrino data. Moreover, its investigation is of extreme importance because it may reveal the existence of electromagnetic properties of neutrinos and provide a significant addition to our understanding of solar dynamics. Although the idea of a sizeable neutrino magnetic moment interacting with the solar field [1] lay dormant for some time, it was reintroduced in 1986 [2] to explain the claimed periodicity of the Chlorine event rate, but the effect remains inconclusive. In summary it works as follows: active neutrinos can be converted to sterile ones owing to the interaction of µ ν with B. At times of intense solar activity Strong B large µ ν B large conversion (1) with little or no conversion otherwise. Hence a neutrino flux anticorrelated to solar activity. Period 1991-97 1998-03 SAGE & Ga-GNO 77.8±5.0 63.3±3.6 Ga-GNO only 77.5±7.7 62.9±6.0 no. of suspots 52 100 Table I - Event rates in solar neutrino units for Ga experiments in two different periods of solar activity and number of sunspots in the same periods. In table I the neutrino event rate in Gallium experiments (SAGE and Gallex-GNO[3]) is shown as a function of time with the number of sunspots in the same period. It is seen from thistablethatthereisa2.4σ discrepancy inthecombinedresultsover thetwoperiods. Since the sunspot number is correlated to solar activity, this is suggestive of an anticorrelation of the Ga event rate with the 11-year solar cycle. No other experiments show such a variational effect, therefore since Ga are the only ones with a significant contribution of pp, 7 Beneutrinos ( 80%), the timedependence ofthese fluxes becomes anopenpossibility. 2. The bottom of the solar convective zone is a region where, owing to the relatively strong rotationgradient, the solar field is expected to have a maximum which can be as high as 300 kg and may be connected to the magnetic surface activity. The typical density profile of the sun requires the mass square difference associated to resonant conversion from active to nonactive neutrinos to be of the order of 10 8 ev 2 [4],[5]. This excludes the solar and atmospheric mass square differences, m 2 21 and m 2 32, and therefore conversion to ν µ or ν τ. Since only three neutrino families are known to exist, we must introduce sterile neutrinos. 1

We consider the simplest possible assumption whereby they mix with active ones through the magnetic moment only, so that in the vacuum ν s ν e ν x = 1 0 0 0 c θ s θ 0 s θ c θ ν 0 ν 1 ν 2 (2) while in matter with a magnetic field H M = m 2 10 µ 2E ν B 0 µ ν B m2 21 m 2 21 0 2E s2 θ +V e m 2 21 s 4E 2θ 4E s 2θ m 2 21 2E c2 θ +V x (3) with standard notation. The new mass square difference m 2 10 = m 2 1 m 2 0 fixes the location of the active sterile transition for each neutrino energy. 10-9 10-10 λ 2 10-11 Radiative Zone Convective Zone ev 10-12 λ 1 10-13 10-14 λ 0 10-15 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 r/r s Figure 1: The evolution of the mass matter eigenvalues along the solar neutrino trajectory. Fortypical parameter values(peakfieldb 0 = 2.2 10 5 G, m 2 10 = 6.0 10 9 ev 2, E = 0.33MeV) the eigenvalue evolution within the sun is shown in fig.1. All pp neutrinos resonate around the bottom of the convective zone in this case. It is seen that the strongly For details see ref. [4]. 2

adiabatic LMA transition, whose location is determined for each energy by m 2 21, takes place in the solar core. The active sterile transition, whose adiabaticity depends on the magnetic field strength and its extension, takes place around the upper radiative/lower convective zone (i. e. the tachocline). The large order of magnitude difference between m 2 21 (7 8 10 5 ev 2 ) and m 2 10 ( 6 10 9 ev 2 ) ensures the two resonances to be located far apart so they do not interfere. In fig.1 the vanishing field case is denoted by the two dotted lines crossing at the place where λ 1 and λ 0 nearly meet (critical density). The two field profiles chosen are peaked at the bottom of the convective zone and can be seen in fig.1 of ref.[5]. If these are time dependent (possibly connected to solar activity), the effect provides a modulation of the pp neutrino flux mainly. For larger m 2 10 (ev 2 ) (= 1.0 10 8 ev 2 ) the spin flavour precession resonance moves in the direction of the solar surface and both pp and 7 Be fluxes become modulated (pp+ 7 Be modulation). 3. Our knowledge of the solar neutrino spectrum is very limited. 8 B, the best well known flux, accounts for just 10 4 of the total, while pp and 7 Be accounting for more than 98%, have only been observed in the radiochemical Ga experiments in accumulation with all other fluxes. In view of a hint from Ga experiments that low energy fluxes might be time dependent, we need real time dedicated low energy experiments to ascertain this possibility. We next consider the predictions for two of the forthcoming ones: Borexino and LENS [4]. (I) Borexino This is a liquid scintillator detector installed in Gran Sasso Laboratory using ν e scattering, aiming at starting physics in late 2006. The kinetic energy threshold of 250 kev and maximum of 664 kev ensures that this experiment is directed mainly at 7 Be neutrino flux (E Be = 0.86MeV). The reduced rate for Borexino is, in standard notation R Bor = Tmax T min dt E max E min deφ(e)[p ee (E) dσνe +(1 P dt ee(e)) dσνx Tmax T min dt E max E min deφ(e) dσνe dt dt ] (4) and is shown in fig.2 as a function of the peak field B 0. It is seen that in the pp + 7 Be dominated modulation the rate decreases faster for increasing B 0, thus exhibiting more sensitivity to solar activity than in the pp case: the more sensitive 7 Be flux is to the peak field, the more sensitive will the event rate be. As the Borexino collaboration expects a combined error (statistical+systematic) of 10% and 5% after 1 and 3 years run, both scenarios can be perceptible after 1 year. 3

0.8 pp Modulation pp + 7 Be Modulation 0.7 Reduced Rate 0.6 0.5 0.4 5.0 10 4 1.0 10 5 1.5 10 5 2.0 10 5 2.5 10 5 3.0 10 5 B 0 Figure 2: Reduced Borexino event rate as a function of the peak field value. (II) LENS (Low Energy Neutrino Spectroscopy) LENS is a real time detector in late stages of development measuring solar neutrinos through the charged current reaction ν e + 115 In 115 Sn+e (5) with the lowest threshold yet: Q=114 kev. The signal energy is directly and uniquely related to the neutrino energy, hence a resolved spectrum of all low energy components (pp, 7 Be, pep, CNO) can be obtained that qualitatively shows how the sun shines. The LENS event rate is R LENS (E e ) = Emax Q P ee (E)f(E e,e e )φ(e)de (6) where E e is the physical electron energy, E e = E Q. For pp + 7 Be modulation ( m 2 10 = 1.0 10 8 ev 2 ) R LENS (E e ) is shown in fig.3. 4. To conclude: low energy solar neutrino experiments should at present be regarded as a major objective in the solar neutrino program, as time modulation is hinted by the Gallium experiments. Running Borexino and LENS during a significant fraction of a solar cycle will 4

25 20 SSM LMA - Quiet Sun LMA +rsfp - SemiQuiet Sun LMA+rsfp - Active Sun Events/10 KeV/10t/yr 15 10 5 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Signal Electron Kinetic Energy (MeV) Figure 3: LENS rate for pp+ 7 Be modulation and a peak field 250 kg for the lower line. certainly test the possible modulation effect in the low energy sector, thus providing evidence for µ ν and new physics. References [1] A. Cisneros, Astrophys. Space Sci. 10 (1971) 87. [2] L. B. Okun, M. B. Voloshin and M. I. Vysotsky, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 44 (1986) 440 [Yad. Fiz. 44 (1986) 677]. [3] C. M. Cattadori, talk at XXI International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics, Neutrino 2004, http://neutrino2004.in2p3.fr/. [4] B. C. Chauhan and J. Pulido, JHEP 0406 (2004) 008 [arxiv:hep-ph/0402194]. [5] B. C. Chauhan, J. Pulido and R. S. Raghavan, JHEP 0507 (2005) 051 [arxiv:hepph/0504069]. 5