Euramet project 1075 Bilateral comparison

Similar documents
NEW VSL Conditioning plate!

WGFF Guidelines for CMC Uncertainty and Calibration Report Uncertainty

Supplementary Comparison EURAMET.EM-S19 EURAMET Project No. 688

AFRIMETS. Supplementary Comparison Programme. Calibration of Gauge Blocks. by Mechanical Comparison Method AFRIMETS.L S3.

Comparison of V and 10 V DC Voltage References

Final Report on APMP.M.M-K4.1 - Bilateral Comparison of 1 kg Stainless Steel Mass Standards between KRISS and A*STAR

Calibration, traceability, uncertainty and comparing measurement results. Workshop 16 March 2015 VSL, Delft The Netherlands

INTERNATIONAL KEY COMPARISON OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON FLOW FACILITIES CCM-FF-K2 (Final Report) BIPM Pavillon de Breteuil F Sevres France

Final Report on the EURAMET.PR-K1.a-2009 Comparison of Spectral Irradiance 250 nm nm

R SANAS Page 1 of 7

Technical Protocol of the Bilateral Comparison in Primary Angular Vibration Calibration CCAUV.V-S1

Evaluation of the Effect of Relative Humidity of Air on the Coefficients of Critical Flow Venturi Nozzles

Technical Protocol of the CIPM Key Comparison CCAUV.V-K5

Comparison of primary standards for liquid micro flow rates

Final Report EUROMET PROJECT 818 CALIBRATION FACTOR OF THERMISTOR MOUNTS. Jan P.M. de Vreede

Document No: TR 12 Issue No: 1

High pressure comparisons between seven European National Laboratories

The MMs are 4 KRAL screw meters, normally permanently installed in the BEV test rig as secondary working standards.

Comparison protocol EURAMET project

Portuguese Institute for Quality. Contents

NORTH SEA FLOW MEASUREMENT WORKSHOP 2004 In. St Andrews, Scotland

Calibration Models and Uncertainty Analysis of the Euroloop Liquid Hydrocarbon Flow Facility

Nanometrology and its role in the development of nanotechnology

Final Report on Comparison of Hydraulic Pressure Balance Effective Area Determination in the Range up to 80 MPa

Inter-laboratory Comparison of Impedance-Type Hygrometer in the Range from 10 % to 95 % at 5 C to 55 C

INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON BETWEEN TUBITAK-UME TURKEY AND INM ROMANIA IN THE FIELD OF FORCE MEASUREMENTS

Supplementary Comparison EUROMET.EM-S23 EURAMET PROJECT No 815 FINAL REPORT

Metrology Principles for Earth Observation: the NMI view. Emma Woolliams 17 th October 2017

Report on Key Comparison COOMET.AUV.A-K5: Pressure calibration of laboratory standard microphones in the frequency range 2 Hz to 10 khz

ANNEXE 8. Technical protocols for the interlaboratory comparisons

Appendix B1. Reports of SMU

Force Key Comparison EUROMET.M.F-K2. (50 kn and 100 kn) EURAMET Project No 518. Final Report. 14 July Pilot: NPL, United Kingdom

Physikalisch- Technische Bundesanstalt

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF PLATINUM RESISTANCE THERMOMETERS BETWEEN CHILE AND ECUADOR

Development of the High-Temperature Dew-Point Generator Over the Past 15 Years

EURAMET Project no Inter-comparison of a 1000 L proving tank

Science of Stability 2017

*Corresponding author,

E v a l u a t i o n C e r t i f i c a t e

EURAMET Project No. 1296

Measurement & Uncertainty - Basic concept and its application

AN EXPLANATION OF THE DG-1000 ACCURACY SPECIFICATIONS

The new Closed Loop pigsar and its projected CMC. Jos van der Grinten, Detlef Vieth, Bodo Mickan

Metrology for single nanometer manufacturing. Richard Koops, Arthur van de Nes, Marijn van Veghel

Final Results of Bilateral Comparison between NIST and PTB for Flows of High Pressure Natural Gas

A Sub-millikelvin Calibration Facility in the Range 0 C to 30 C

CHARACTERIZATION OF LPM'S 1-T DEW POINT GENERATOR

Infrared Thermometer Calibration A Complete Guide

CCM short note on the dissemination process after the proposed redefinition of the kilogram

High pressure comparison among seven European national laboratories

The National Unitary Institution "Belarusian State Institute of Metrology" (BelGIM)

Euramet project 1187 Comparison of Instrument Current Transformers up to 10 ka. Technical protocol (March 2012)

Supplementary comparison SIM.M.FF-S12. Final Report for Volume of Liquids at 20 L

Establishment of a Traceability Chain in Metrology for Materials

Final Report 06 July 2006 Frank Wilkinson, Gan Xu, and Yuanjie Liu

Final Report on COOMET Supplementary Comparison of Capacitance at 100 pf (COOMET.EM-S4)

Measurement & Uncertainty - Concept and its application

Development of procedures for calibration of meteorological sensors. Case study: calibration of a tipping-bucket rain gauge and data-logger set

E C t y p e - e x a m i n a t i o n C e r t i f i c a t e

405 Compact Orifice Series and 1595 Conditioning Orifice Plate Flow Test Data Book and Flow Handbook

405 Compact Orifice Series and 1595 Conditioning Orifice Plate Flow Test Data Book and Flow Handbook

Upgrade of 5m-Bench System for Traceable Measurements of Tapes and Rules at SASO-NMCC Dimensional Laboratory

Quality assurance for sensors at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)

405 Compact Orifice Series and 1595 Conditioning Orifice Plate Flow Test Data Book and Flow Handbook

Final Report on COOMET Key Comparison of Capacitance at 10 pf (COOMET.EM-K4)

The Journey from Ω Through 19 Orders of Magnitude

Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) and its supplemental guides

IMPORTANT FEATURES OF ESTIMATION & INTERPRETATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY. B. Bhattacharya, K. Ramani, P.H. Bhave

Guidelines for the Selection and Operation of Provers with Micro Motion ELITE Coriolis Flow Meters

by A.Tonina*, R.Iuzzolino*, M.Bierzychudek* and M.Real* S. Solve + R. Chayramy + and M. Stock +

Calibration of Temperature Block Calibrators

TOLERANCES AND UNCERTAINTIES IN PERFORMANCE DATA OF REFRIGERANT COMPRESSORS JANUARY 2017

Report on EURAMET.M.M-S9

Vocabulary of Metrology

Develop and characterize a flow metering standard down to 1 nl/min

ERROR SOURCE IDENTIFICATION AND STABILITY TEST OF A PRECISION CAPACITANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM

National Physical Laboratory Hampton Road Teddington Middlesex United Kingdom TW11 0LW

Investigating the Change in Acceleration of a Trolley Running Down an Inclined Plane

Pascal ET is an handheld multifunction calibrator for the measurement and simulation of the following parameters: - pressure

Quality assurance for sensors at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)

METHODS TO CONFIRM THE MEASUREMENT CAPABILITY OF THE FORCE STANDARD MACHINES AFTER REINSTALLATION

Final Report On COOMET Vickers PTB/VNIIFTRI Key Comparison (COOMET.M.H- K1.b and COOMET.M.H- K1.c)

ALASTAIR MCLACHLAN Applications Cameron

A compression load cell, with strain gauges, tested as a part of a weighing instrument. Manufacturer : Molen or Precia Molen.

EAS 535 Laboratory Exercise Weather Station Setup and Verification

Establishing traceability and estimating measurement uncertainty in physical, chemical and biological measurements

2.1. Accuracy, n- how close the indication of the thermometer is to the true value.

SAMPLE. Accuracy Calibration Certificate. Mettler Toledo 1900 Polaris Parkway Contact: Instrument Type: EURAMET cg-18 v. 4.0 Sample ACC WI v.1.

TYPICAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY DEFINED BY AN FPG8601 FORCE BALANCED PISTON GAUGE

Typical pressure measurement uncertainty defined by an FPG8601 Force Balanced Piston Gauge

Standard Practices for Air Speed Calibration Testing

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

Final Report August 2010

COOMET.M.V-S2 (587/RU-a/12) COOMET SUPPLEMENTARY COMPARISON IN THE FIELD OF MEASUREMENTS OF LIQUIDS KINEMATIC VISCOSITY

CMM Uncertainty Budget

H1: Metrological support. Milena Horvat, Polona Vreča, Tea Zuliani, Radojko Jaćimović, Radmila Milačič

SHENZHEN MORLAB COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD

A comparison of primary platinum-iridium kilogram mass standards among eighteen European NMIs

Numerical Methods Applied to Fluid Flow Metering. Ernst von Lavante University of Duisburg-Essen

SIM FORCE STANDARDS COMPARISON UP TO 10 kn

Transcription:

Bilateral comparison Between the gas flow standards of the national Metrology Institutes of Bulgaria (BIM-NCM) and The Netherlands (VSL) Copyright VSL B.V. Dutch Metrology Institute

Page 2 of 19 VSL Thijsseweg 11 2629 JA Delft Postbus 654 2600 AR Delft The Netherlands T 015 269 1500 F 015 261 2971 E info@vsl.nl I www.vsl.nl

Page 3 of 19 Introduction and purpose of the bilateral comparison. The purpose of this bilateral comparison of gas flow measurement standards is to support the Calibration and Measurement Capabilities (CMC) of the Bulgarian Institute of Metrology (BIM-NCM). This comparison has been performed under the framework of Euramet (known as project number 1075). The aim of the comparison was that the measurement s at different flow rates between the three gas flow measurement standards found using three flow meters did not exceed the summed uncertainty claims of the two gas flow measurement standards according to the E n value calculation for bilateral comparisons (E n <1). VSL was the pilot laboratory for the bilateral comparison due to the fact that VSL has an entry in the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) Mutual Recognition Arrangement (known as the CIPM MRA) for gas flow measurement. For this bilateral comparison VSL has used Euramet Guide no. 3 -Euramet Guidelines on Conducting Comparisons. In addition VSL has followed the technical aspects of ILAC guideline G13 -ILAC Guidelines for the Requirements for the Competence of Providers of Proficiency Testing Schemes. Dordrecht, Rowald Haze May 2009

Page 4 of 19 1 The reference value... 5 2 Specification of the measurement standards... 6 2.1 Specification of the gas flow standard of BIM-NCM... 6 2.2 Specification of the gas flow standard of VSL... 7 3 The test protocol... 9 3.1 Description of the travel standards... 9 3.2 Measurement protocol, flow rates and flow points...10 4 Summarized results of the flow meters...11 4.1 Results overview...11 4.1.1 Elster IRM-A-DUO / G40, no.: 20515215 / 2008...11 4.1.2 5-dm3 wet gas, Meterfabriek no. 21306 / 1972...12 4.1.3 1-dm3 wet gas, Schlumberger no. 26023 /1986...12 5 Calculation of the E n values based upon the uncertainty claims...13 5.1 E n values of Elster IRM-A-DUO I G40, no.: 20515215 I 2008...13 5.2 E n values of 5-dm 3 wet gas, Meterfabriek no. 21306 / 1972...14 5.3 E n values of 1-dm 3 wet gas, Schiumberger no. 26023 11986...14 6 Conclusion...15 Contact details of project members...16 7 Measurement results of BIM-NCM and NMi-VSL...17 7.1 Measurements results as reported from BIM-NCM...17 7.2 Measurement results from NMi-VSL...18 8 Reference documents...19

Page 5 of 19 1 The reference value To compare the two gas flow measurement standards three well known flow meters have been selected. For flow measurement standards it is impossible to have a direct reference value like a volume of a prover tank. Therefore the reference value is the measurement of the quantity indication, in this case the in volume of the flow meters at given flow-rates. The volumetric measurement is defined as: V = V indication V reference V reference *100 (1.1) V V indication V reference = The measurement in the volume indication of the flow meter = The measurement indication as given by the flow meter under test = The volume that has passed through the reference flow meter In this formula V indication is the volumetric volume that is indicated by the flow meter under test during a test run and V reference is the volume that passes through the reference flow meter during a test run. To determine this V reference a calculation has to be made that determines the volume that has passed through the reference flow meter. During the comparison all the flow rates that are mentioned in the protocol will be used in the evaluation of the results.

Page 6 of 19 2 Specification of the measurement standards 2.1 Specification of the gas flow standard of BIM-NCM The gas flow measurement standard used by BIM is a test rig that is based on venturi nozzles which are used at their critical flow. The flow rate through the nozzle depends on the geometry of the nozzle and the thermodynamic behavior of the gas upstream of the nozzle. The medium used is ambient temperature air. The test rig consist of 11 nozzles that can be individually selected or put parallel so that different flow rates can be selected [1]. A maximum of six different nozzles can be put parallel to achieve a defined flow rate. The maximum flow rate of the test rig is 70,7 m 3 /h and the minimum flow rate of the test rig is 0,025 m 3 /h. The vacuum pump assures the necessary pressure difference over the nozzles in order to deliver the needed flow to calibrate the meter under test. As can be seen in the layout the calibration rig is supplied with pressure and temperature transmitters at the location of the meter under test and with pressure transmitters at the location of the nozzles. In total there are eight temperature transmitters, nine sensors for absolute pressure and a hygrometer to measure air humidity in the range of 10 to 90. During a calibration relevant calibration parameters are recorded by data acquisition with PC and software. The nozzles are periodically calibrated at PTB and the temperature and pressure transmitters at the national center of metrology. Figure 1: Layout of the calibration rig of BIM with the maximum number of nozzles that can be put parallel.

Page 7 of 19 2.2 Specification of the gas flow standard of VSL The gas flow travel standards that are used by VSL during the bilateral comparison are the following. A 1 liter wet gas travel meter and a 5 liter wet gas travel meter. To calibrate the 1 liter wet gas travel meter a 5 liter wet gas master was used as a reference. For the 5 I wet gas travel meter the 5 I and a 50 I wet gas meter were used as a reference standard. The 5 and 50 liter wet gas reference meter are calibrated on a regular basis. The uncertainty of the 5 liter wet gas reference meter is 0.24 and the uncertainty of the 50 liter wet gas reference meter is 0.21. The manufacturer of both wet gas meters is Meterfabriek Dordrecht. The calibration of the G40 travel meter was performed on a bell prover. The bell prover is divided in three different volumes. These volumes are 200, 100 and 30 liters. The uncertainties of the different volumes of the bell prover are 0.15 for the 30 liter volume, 0.16 for the 100 liter volume and 0.20 for the 30 liter volume. Both calibration set ups are equipped with temperature and pressure transmitters. The data acquisition, recording of the readout of the flow meter, temperature and pressure is performed manually. The tests are performed under atmospheric pressure. Type ID code[-] Manufacturer CMC (] 5 Liter wet gas meter 10V35/0608 Meterfabriek Dordrecht 0.24 50 Liter wet gas meter 10V35/0601 Meterfabnek Dordrecht 0.21 Bell prover (0.50 m 3 ) 10V21/1601 Wilson 0.15; 0.16; 0.20 Table 2.1: References used at NM1-VSL in Delft in the comparison.

Page 8 of 19 Figure 2.1: On the left the bell prover make Wilson and on the right the 50 liter wet gas meter make Meterfabriek Dordrecht.

Page 9 of 19 3 The test protocol 3.1 Description of the travel standards Three travel standards are used in the comparison. Two travel standards are or of the type wet gas meter and one is of the type rotary piston meter. In the table below the specifications of the travel standards are mentioned futher. Description Meter no. 1: Meter no. 2: Meter no. 3: Principal Wet gas meter Wet gas meter Duo rotor meter Make Schlumberger Meterfabriek Dordrecht Model 1 liter 5 liter G40 Elster-Instromet B.V. Serial number 26023/1986 21306/1972 20515215/2008 Minimum flow 16 I/h 60 I/h 0,5 m 3 /h Maximum flow 300 I/h 1200 I/h 65 m 3 /h Table 3.1: Description of the three travel standards used in the comparison. Figure 3.1: On the left the 5 liter wet gas meter, make Meterfabriek Dordrecht, on the right G40 duo rotor meter, make Elster-lnstromet B. V.

Page 10 of 19 3.2 Measurement protocol, flow rates and flow points To perform the comparison a number of flow rates were chosen. These flow rates were chosen in such a way that there would be overlap between the different flow standards. And also that the whole range of the calibration rig of BIM-NCM could be compared with the flow standards of NMi. In the table below the different flow rates and flow points can be seen. The tests are performed with ambient air at local conditions. The readout of the G40 flow meter is a pulse output. The pulse can be connected at the center two pins of the six pins that are available. The readout of the wet gas meters is an analog readout. The setup of the wet gas meters is especially important. The wet gas meters are filled with oil and the oil level should be set at such a level that the pin that is used to set oil level does not break the oil level. The flow meter should be level when filling the flow meter. During the comparison relevant flow parameters are recorded and reported to NMi- VSL. Flow meter [-] Wet gas meter Schlumberger Wet gas meter Meterfabriek Dordrecht Duo rotor meter Elster Instromet Flow rates [m 3 /h] 0.025; 0.040; 0.060; 0.13; 0.27 0.13; 0.27; 0.41; 0.83; 1.10 0.83; 1.10; 5.06; 20.0; 39.7; 64.6 Number of runs per flow rate [-] 5 5 5 Table 3.2: The flow rates and number of runs per flow rate that have been used in the comparison.

Page 11 of 19 4 Summarized results of the flow meters To be able to compare the results of the comparison the measurement results were put into graphs. The numerical overview of the results can be found in chapter 5 and 6. The first graph shows the results of the Elster Duo Rotor meter, the second graph shows the results of the 5 liter wet gas meter and the third graph shows the results of the 1 liter wet gas meter. 4.1 Results overview 4.1.1 Elster IRM-A-DUO / G40, no.: 20515215 / 2008 Graph 4.1.: The graphical results of the found s of BIM and NMi-VSL.

Page 12 of 19 4.1.2 5-dm3 wet gas, Meterfabriek no. 21306 / 1972 Graph 4.2.: The graphical results of the found s of BIM and NMi-VSL. 4.1.3 1-dm3 wet gas, Schlumberger no. 26023 /1986 BMi and NMi Schlumberger no. 26023 / 1986 Graph 4.3.: The graphical results of the found s of BIM and NM1-VSL.

Page 13 of 19 5 Calculation of the E n values based upon the uncertainty claims To evaluate the bilateral comparison the so called En value should be calculated. An Envalue of 1 and smaller indicates measurements results that overlap. Envalues of 1 and larger indicate measurement results that do not overlap. For each flow rate this calculation is performed. The formula for the En is: E n = X lab - X pilot Sqrt( U 2 exp lab + U 2 exp pilot) (5.1) In this formula E n = the E n value in the comparison X lab, X pilot = the reported s in the measurement results U exp lab, U exp pilot = The calculated expanded uncertainties of the measurement results In the tables below the results can be seen of the calibration of the three flow meters. The table indicates the flow rates at which the was determined. The mean of the five calibration runs and the expanded uncertainty of the reported. Finally at the end of the table the E n values are indicated as they are calculated from the reported s and uncertainties. 5.1 E n values of Elster IRM-A-DUO I G40, no.: 20515215 I 2008 BIM NMi BIM-NMi Flow rate Mean U exp Flow rate Mean (m 3 /h) () [m 3 /h] [] () (-) 64.6 0.02 0.17 64.8 0.07 0.16-0.19 39.7 0.01 0.15 39.7 0.03 0.16-0.12 20.0 0.00 0.16 20.0-0.01 0.16 0.03 5.06-0.02 0.14 5.07-0.02 0.16 0.00 1.10-0.10 0.17 1.10-0.14 0.16 0.18 0.83-0.20 0.17 0.83-0.18 0.17-0.06 U exp E n Table 5.1.: Flow rates, found s and E n results of the Elster IRM-A -DUO / G40

Page 14 of 19 5.2 E n values of 5-dm 3 wet gas, Meterfabriek no. 21306 / 1972 BIM NMI BIM-NMi Flow rate Mean U exp Flow rate Mean U exp [m 3 /h] [] [] [m 3 /h] [] [] [-] 1.1-0.22 0.18 1.11 0.40 0.23-2.12 0.83-0.01 0.17 0.83 0.62 0.22-2.31 0.41-0.02 0.18 0.41 0.71 0.21-2.60 0.27 0.02 018 0.27 0.75 0.21-2.62 0.13-0.07 0.21 0.13 0.77 0.21-2.81 E n Table 5.2.: Flow rates, found s en E n results of the 5 liter wet gas meter Meterfabriek 5.3 E n values of 1-dm 3 wet gas, Schiumberger no. 26023 11986 BIM NMI BIM-NMi Flow rate Mean U exp Flow rate Mean U exp [m 3 /h] [] [] [m 3 /h] [] [] [-] 0.27-0.06 0.16 0.27 0.40 0.29-1.39 0.13 0.02 0.18 0.13 0.45 0.24-1.43 0.06 0.06 0.16 0.06 0.46 0.27-1.27 0.04-0.02 0.21 0.04 0.44 0.26-1.38 0.03-0.12 0.21 0.03 0.44 0.25-1.72 E n Table 5.3.: Flow rates, found s en E n results of the 1 liter wet gas meter Schlumberger

Page 15 of 19 6 Conclusion The purpose of the bilateral comparison of gas flow standards was to support the Calibration and Measurement Capabilities (CMC) of the Bulgarian Institute of Metrology (BIM-NCM). Since the results of only one of the flow meters falls within the E n value of 1 it is not possible to determine that the entire flow range falls within the uncertainty claims. The results of BIM-NCM of the two wet gas meters show an offset when compared to the results from NMi-VSL. However the results of the Elster duo rotor flow meter in the range of 0,8 to 64 m3/h are well within the E n value of 1. The results of the wet gas meters are more easily influenced by flow meter setup. Setting the oil level correctly is essential to be able to achieve accurate results. The handling of the G40 duo rotor flow meter is more straight forward. After interviewing and discussions with and between BIM and NMi it was established that the procedure for setting up the wet gas meter was not consistent between BIM and NMi. For this reason the measurement results for both wet gas meters are not useful for the comparison between the gas calibration standards of BIM and BIM. This indicates that the calibration daims for the higher flow rates can be verified. But it is not possible to demonstrate this, at the present moment, for flows lower than 0.83m 3 /h.

Page 16 of 19 Contact details of project members Conact person Richard Paton Chairman Euramet technical Euramet TUV NEL committee Flow. Coordinator bilateral and contact person VSL Project leader for Comparison between BIM-NCM and VSL Contact person BIM-NCM Contact person Euramet Rowald Haze NMi Nederland B.V. Hugo de Grootplein 1 3314 EG DORDRECHT The Netherlands T +31 786332374 E rhaze@nmi.nl Jos Verbeek VSL B.V. Thijsseweg 11 2629JADELFT The Netherlands T+31 152691644 E Jverbeek@vsl.nl Eugene Mitev Directorate of Measures and Measuring Instruments Bulgarian Institute of Metrology 52B, G.M.Dimitrov Blvd Sofia, 1125 Bulgaria e.mitev@maii.bg Richard Paton TUV NEL Scottish Enterprise Technology Park East Kilbride Glasgow G75 OQU Scotland E rpaton@tuvnel.com Responsible for organizing the bilateral comparison and execution of the tests at VSL. Contact if there are any problems with any communications with coordinator. Responsible for performing of the tests at BIM-NCM. Chairman Euramet technical committee Flow

Page 17 of 19 7 Measurement results of BIM-NCM and NMi-VSL 7.1 Measurements results as reported from BIM-NCM Measuring instrument: Duo rotor meter Manufacturer: Elster Serial number: 20515215 I 2008 Flow rate m3/h mean Unc. type A Unc. typeb Unc. A+B Number of runs Degree of freedom Coefficient of expansion Expanded uncertainty 0.830-0.1973 0.0331 0.0762 0.0831 5 158.7 2.02 0.1675 1.100-0.1014 0.0352 0.0771 0.0848 5 134.1 2.02 0.1711 5.060-0.0209 0.0072 0.0690 0.0694 5 INF 2.00 0.1390 20.000 0.0022 0.0393 0.0688 0.0792 5 66.3 2.04 0.1615 39.700 0.0080 0.0229 0.0707 0.0743 5 444.6 2.01 0.1490 64.600 0.0222 0.0443 0.0717 0.0843 5 52.4 2.05 0.1727 Measuring instrument: Wet gas meter Manufacturer: Meterfabriek Serial number: 21306/1972 Flow rate m3/h mean Unc. type A Unc. type B Unc. A+B number of runs degree of freedom coefficient of expansion expanded uncertainty 0.130-0.0680 0.0487 0.0935 0.1055 5 87.8 2.03 0.2140 0.270 0.0247 0.0286 0.0833 0.0881 5 360.9 2.01 0.1768 0.410-0.0191 0.0374 0.0803 0.0886 5 125.6 2.02 0.1791 0.830-0.0093 0.0275 0.0775 0.0822 5 320.0 2.01 0.1651 1.100-0.2164 0.0428 0.0786 0.0895 5 76.4 2.03 0.1820 Measuring instrument: Wet gas meter Manufacturer: Schlumberger Serial number: 26023/1986 Flow rate m3/h mean Unc. type A Unc. type B Unc. A+B number of runs degree of freedom coefficient of expansion expanded uncertainty 0.025-0.1220 0.0199 0.1042 0.1061 5 INF 2.00 0.2125 0.040-0.0213 0.0221 0.1043 0.1066 5 INF 2.00 0.2135 0.060 0.0617 0.0176 0.0761 00781 5 INF 2.00 0.1564 0.130 0.0163 0.0135 0.0904 0.0914 5 INF 2.00 0.1830 0.270-0.0642 0.0123 0.0799 0.0809 5 INF 2.00 0.1620

Page 18 of 19 7.2 Measurement results from NMi-VSL Measuring instrument: Duo rotor meter Manufacturer: Elster Serial number: 20515215/2008 Flowrate [m 3 /h] Mean [] U b [J U a [] U exp [] 64.8 0.07 016 0.02 0.16 39.7 0.03 0.16 0.02 0.16 20.0-0.01 0.16 0.01 0.16 5.07-0.02 0.16 0.02 0.16 1.10-0.14 0.16 0.03 0.16 0.83-0.18 0.16 0.07 0.17 Measuring instrument: Wet gas meter Manufacturer Meterfabriek Serial number: 21306/1972 Flowrate [m 3 /h] Mean [] U b [J U a [] U exp [] 1.11 0.40 0.21 0.09 0.23 0.83 0.62 0.21 0.06 0.22 0.41 0.71 0.21 0.04 0.21 0.27 0.75 0.21 0.01 0.21 0.13 0.77 0.21 0.01 0.21 Measuring instrument: Wet gas meter Manufacturer Schlumberger Serial number: 26023/1986 Flowrate [m 3 /h] Mean [] U b [J U a [] U exp [] 0.27 0.40 0.24 0.16 0.29 0.13 0.45 0.24 0.03 0.24 0.06 0.46 0.24 0.12 0.27 0.041 0.44 0.24 0.09 0.26 0.027 0.44 0.24 0.05 0.25

Page 19 of 19 8 Reference documents 1 Euramet Guide no. 3 Euramet Guidelines on Conducting Comparisons. 2 ILAC guideline G13 ILAC Guidelines for the Requirements for the Competence of Providers of Proficiency Testing Schemes 3 JCGM 100:2008 Evaluation of measurement data Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement 4 EA 4/02 Expression of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration