in a circular cylindrical cavity K. Kakazu Department of Physics, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa , Japan Y. S. Kim

Similar documents
arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 11 Nov 1995

Bogoliubov Transformation in Classical Mechanics

7.2 INVERSE TRANSFORMS AND TRANSFORMS OF DERIVATIVES 281

CHAPTER 8 OBSERVER BASED REDUCED ORDER CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR LARGE SCALE LINEAR DISCRETE-TIME CONTROL SYSTEMS

A novel protocol for linearization of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation

Physics 741 Graduate Quantum Mechanics 1 Solutions to Final Exam, Fall 2014

A Constraint Propagation Algorithm for Determining the Stability Margin. The paper addresses the stability margin assessment for linear systems

Lecture 17: Analytic Functions and Integrals (See Chapter 14 in Boas)

NULL HELIX AND k-type NULL SLANT HELICES IN E 4 1

Chapter 4. The Laplace Transform Method

where F (x) (called the Similarity Factor (SF)) denotes the function

Approximate Analytical Solution for Quadratic Riccati Differential Equation

New bounds for Morse clusters

Laplace Transformation

84 ZHANG Jing-Shang Vol. 39 of which would emit 5 He rather than 3 He. 5 He i untable and eparated into n + pontaneouly, which can alo be treated a if

Fermi Distribution Function. n(e) T = 0 T > 0 E F

To appear in International Journal of Numerical Methods in Fluids in Stability analysis of numerical interface conditions in uid-structure therm

ON THE APPROXIMATION ERROR IN HIGH DIMENSIONAL MODEL REPRESENTATION. Xiaoqun Wang

One Class of Splitting Iterative Schemes

Control Systems Analysis and Design by the Root-Locus Method

UNIQUE CONTINUATION FOR A QUASILINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATION IN THE PLANE

Online Appendix for Managerial Attention and Worker Performance by Marina Halac and Andrea Prat

Factor Analysis with Poisson Output

Automatic Control Systems. Part III: Root Locus Technique

Notes on Phase Space Fall 2007, Physics 233B, Hitoshi Murayama

A PROOF OF TWO CONJECTURES RELATED TO THE ERDÖS-DEBRUNNER INEQUALITY

A BATCH-ARRIVAL QUEUE WITH MULTIPLE SERVERS AND FUZZY PARAMETERS: PARAMETRIC PROGRAMMING APPROACH

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

Math 273 Solutions to Review Problems for Exam 1

Avoiding Forbidden Submatrices by Row Deletions

Supplementary Figures

PHYS 110B - HW #6 Spring 2004, Solutions by David Pace Any referenced equations are from Griffiths Problem statements are paraphrased

V = 4 3 πr3. d dt V = d ( 4 dv dt. = 4 3 π d dt r3 dv π 3r2 dv. dt = 4πr 2 dr

Convex Hulls of Curves Sam Burton

IEOR 3106: Fall 2013, Professor Whitt Topics for Discussion: Tuesday, November 19 Alternating Renewal Processes and The Renewal Equation

Clustering Methods without Given Number of Clusters

Unbounded solutions of second order discrete BVPs on infinite intervals

696 Fu Jing-Li et al Vol. 12 form in generalized coordinate Q ffiq dt = 0 ( = 1; ;n): (3) For nonholonomic ytem, ffiq are not independent of

Euler-Bernoulli Beams

Chapter 5 Consistency, Zero Stability, and the Dahlquist Equivalence Theorem

MATEMATIK Datum: Tid: eftermiddag. A.Heintz Telefonvakt: Anders Martinsson Tel.:

Optimization model in Input output analysis and computable general. equilibrium by using multiple criteria non-linear programming.

Multi-dimensional Fuzzy Euler Approximation

TRIPLE SOLUTIONS FOR THE ONE-DIMENSIONAL

Chapter 7. Root Locus Analysis

The Hassenpflug Matrix Tensor Notation

Copyright 1967, by the author(s). All rights reserved.

USPAS Course on Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linear Accelerators

Reliability Analysis of Embedded System with Different Modes of Failure Emphasizing Reboot Delay

Long-term returns in stochastic interest rate models

An Inequality for Nonnegative Matrices and the Inverse Eigenvalue Problem

ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES AND PHOTONS

How a charge conserving alternative to Maxwell s displacement current entails a Darwin-like approximation to the solutions of Maxwell s equations

Determination of the local contrast of interference fringe patterns using continuous wavelet transform

Math Skills. Scientific Notation. Uncertainty in Measurements. Appendix A5 SKILLS HANDBOOK

Comparison of Low Field Electron Transport Properties in Compounds of groups III-V Semiconductors by Solving Boltzmann Equation Using Iteration Model

Estimation of Peaked Densities Over the Interval [0,1] Using Two-Sided Power Distribution: Application to Lottery Experiments

March 18, 2014 Academic Year 2013/14

Lecture 21. The Lovasz splitting-off lemma Topics in Combinatorial Optimization April 29th, 2004

The continuous time random walk (CTRW) was introduced by Montroll and Weiss 1.

General Field Equation for Electromagnetism and Gravitation

GEOMETRY OF OPTIMAL COVERAGE FOR TARGETS AGAINST A SPACE BACKGROUND SUBJECT TO VISIBILITY CONSTRAINTS

Reading assignment: In this chapter we will cover Sections Definition and the Laplace transform of simple functions

Computers and Mathematics with Applications. Sharp algebraic periodicity conditions for linear higher order

X R. U x U x B. U x U x B X R. U x U x B. U x U x B. one solution. solution. two solutions no solution. one. R two solutions no solution.

WELL-POSEDNESS OF A ONE-DIMENSIONAL PLASMA MODEL WITH A HYPERBOLIC FIELD

Theoretical study of the dual harmonic system and its application on the CSNS/RCS

Social Studies 201 Notes for November 14, 2003

Calculation of the temperature of boundary layer beside wall with time-dependent heat transfer coefficient

Finite Element Truss Problem

Root Locus Diagram. Root loci: The portion of root locus when k assume positive values: that is 0

Reformulation of Block Implicit Linear Multistep Method into Runge Kutta Type Method for Initial Value Problem

ME2142/ME2142E Feedback Control Systems

SOME RESULTS ON INFINITE POWER TOWERS

Introduction to Laplace Transform Techniques in Circuit Analysis

List coloring hypergraphs

Codes Correcting Two Deletions

Solving Differential Equations by the Laplace Transform and by Numerical Methods

Correction for Simple System Example and Notes on Laplace Transforms / Deviation Variables ECHE 550 Fall 2002

Technical Appendix: Auxiliary Results and Proofs

The Fundamental Invariants of the Evans Field Theory

Preemptive scheduling on a small number of hierarchical machines

BUBBLES RISING IN AN INCLINED TWO-DIMENSIONAL TUBE AND JETS FALLING ALONG A WALL

OBSERVER-BASED REDUCED ORDER CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR THE STABILIZATION OF LARGE SCALE LINEAR DISCRETE-TIME CONTROL SYSTEMS

On mild solutions of a semilinear mixed Volterra-Fredholm functional integrodifferential evolution nonlocal problem in Banach spaces

STOCHASTIC GENERALIZED TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM WITH DISCRETE DISTRIBUTION OF DEMAND

EELE 3332 Electromagnetic II Chapter 10

A SIMPLE NASH-MOSER IMPLICIT FUNCTION THEOREM IN WEIGHTED BANACH SPACES. Sanghyun Cho

Chapter 1 Basic Description of Laser Diode Dynamics by Spatially Averaged Rate Equations: Conditions of Validity

into a discrete time function. Recall that the table of Laplace/z-transforms is constructed by (i) selecting to get

STOCHASTIC EVOLUTION EQUATIONS WITH RANDOM GENERATORS. By Jorge A. León 1 and David Nualart 2 CINVESTAV-IPN and Universitat de Barcelona

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Singular perturbation theory

Robust Decentralized Design of H -based Frequency Stabilizer of SMES

STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL GAMES:THE LINEAR QUADRATIC ZERO SUM CASE

Problem Set 8 Solutions

DYNAMIC MODELS FOR CONTROLLER DESIGN

CHAPTER 4 DESIGN OF STATE FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS AND STATE OBSERVERS USING REDUCED ORDER MODEL

[Saxena, 2(9): September, 2013] ISSN: Impact Factor: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES & RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY

Weber Schafheitlin-type integrals with exponent 1

Transcription:

Quantization of electromagnetic eld in a circular cylindrical cavity K. Kakazu Department of Phyic, Univerity of the Ryukyu, Okinawa 903-0, Japan Y. S. Kim Department of Phyic, Univerity of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 We preent a quantization procedure for the electromagnetic eld in a circular cylindrical cavity with perfectly conducting wall, which i baed on the decompoition of the eld. A new decompoition procedure i propoed; all vector mode function atifying the boundary condition are obtained with the help of thi decompoition. After expanding the quantized eld in term of the vector mode function, it i poible to derive the Hamiltonian for thi quantized ytem. PACS:42.50.-p, 03.70.+k

Introduction The behavior of an atom depend on the mode tructure of the electromagnetic eld urrounding it []. The mode tructure in a cavity i determined by it boundary condition which are quite dierent from the periodic boundary condition ued in Lorentz-covariant electrodynamic. There are many intereting eect on the interaction of the atom with the eld with variou boundary condition. It i poible to calculate them and compare them with experimental data [2]. Thank to many new \high-tech" experimental intrument, cavity electrodynamic ha become one of the mot active branche of phyic in recent year. In quantum electrodynamic, we ue the plane wave atifying the periodic boundary condition whoe quantization volume eventually become innite. A a reult, the orientation of the eld i not eential. On the other hand, the eld in a cavitymut atify the boundary condition and the orientation of the eld with repect to cavity wall become an important factor. For thi reaon, we have to ue vector mode function to deal with thi problem. Thee function atify the boundary condition and the boundary eect in turn i contained in the function. Thu, for a given cavity, the mot important tep in the quantization proce i to contruct the vector mode function. Indeed, everal author have invetigated the quantization procedure for the eld in cavitie [3]. They have tudied the eld quantization, the emiion rate, and the atomic level hift in the cavitie with one or two innite plane mirror. Cavity electrodynamic with rectangular coordinate ytem doe not preent further ignicant mathematical problem. However, the cae i quite dierent for cavitie with curved boundary condition. Even for circular cylindrical or pherical cavitie, the quantization procedure ha not yet been rmly etablihed. The purpoe of the preent paper i to dicu in detail the mathematical problem in contructing the vector mode function with a circular cylindrical boundary condition. We hope to dicu the pherical cavity in a later paper. Recently, wehave carried out the eld quantization for everal dierent rectangular boundary condition including a rectangular tube uing the vector mode function [4]. Thee function have been derived with the help of an orthogonal matrix. However, the procedure developed there i not applicable to other cavitie in a traightforward manner. In thi paper, we preent a more general method of obtaining the vector mode function and apply it to the eld quantization in a circular cylindrical cavity with perfectly conducting wall. Thi will be ummarized in two theorem. With thi in mind, we rt decompoe the eld into three part in the circular cylindrical coordinate in the following ection. Then, in Sec. 3, we apply it to the circular cylindrical cavity. After obtaining all vector mode function by uing the decompoition, we arrive at the quantized eld and the quantized electromagnetic Hamiltonian in Sec. 4. 2 Decompoition of Electromagnetic eld Let u now derive the decompoition formula for the electromagnetic eld from Maxwell' equation. Uing the cylindrical coordinate ytem, we hall decompoe the olution of Maxwell' equation into three term, in preparation for the eld quantization within the 2

circular cylindrical cavity in Sec. 3. We emphaize here again that thi decompoition proce i the key to the quantization. Maxwell' equation for the electric eld E and the magnetic eld B in free pace are given by re=0; (2.) rb=0; (2.2) re+@ t B=0; (2.3) rb c 2@ te=0; (2.4) where c i the velocity of light in free pace and @ t = @=@t. Aiwell known, it follow from Maxwell' equation that the eld E and B atify the wave equation: 4 c 2@2 t E=0; 4 c 2@2 t B=0; (2.5) where 4 i the Laplacian operator. The electromagnetic eld E and B can be written in the cylindrical coordinate (r;';z) a E = E T + E z ; B = B T + B z ; (2.6) where E T = e r E r + e ' E ' i the tranvere component of the eld and E z = e z E z. Here e r, e ', and e z are the unit vector in the r, ', and z direction, repectively. Similarly, re, re, and r ( a caler function) can alo be divided into two part. For example, re=r T E+r z E, where the rt term contain the derivative with repect to r and ', while the econd term contain the derivative with repect to z. For implicity, the derivative with repect to r;', and z are decribed a @=@r = @ r, @=@' = @ ' and @=@z = @ z, repectively. Since r z E z = 0, Eq. (2.3) give Similarly, from Eq. (2.4), we have @ t B z = r T E T ; @ t B T = r T E z r z E T : (2.7) c 2@ te z =r T B T ; Equation (2.7) and (2.8) give which lead to c 2@ te T =r T B z +r z B T : (2.8) c 2 @2 t E T = r T @ t B z r z (r T E z +r z E T ); c 2@2 t B T = c 2r T @ t E z r z (r T B z +r z B T ); (2.9) c 2 @2 t E T + r z r z E T r T r T E z =r@ t B z rre z ; c 2@2 t B T +r z r z B T r T r T B z = c 2r@ te z rrb z ;(2.0) 3

where we have ued r T E z = re z. Let u note that r z r z E T = 4 z E T ; r T r T E z = 4 T E z ; c 2 @2 t E T =(4E) T =4E T ; (2.) where (4E) T i the tranvere part of 4E; the lat equation hold in the preent coordinate, although it i not correct in general. (For example, it i not correct in the pherical coordinate.) Then, from Eq. (2.0), we arrive at 4 T E= r r E z + r@ t B z ; 4 T B= c 2r@ te z rrb z : (2.2) To rewrite Eq. (2.2), we mut obtain an expreion for the component E z and B z. Suppoe that the eld i in a nite region and expand E z and B z in term of a certain complete ytem of function with mode : E z (r;t) = B z (r;t) = (E z (r;t)+c:c:); (B z (r;t)+c:c:); (2.3) where E z (r;t)= ~ E z (r)e i! t ; B z (r;t)= ~ B z (r)e i! 2t : (2.4) Here! (! 0; =;2) i determined by uing given boundary condition. Since E z and B z atify the wave equation, their component atify the Helmholtz equation: 4E z = k 2 E z; 4B z = k 2 2 B z; (2.5) where We aume that the component atify k 2 =!2 c 2 : (2.6) @ 2 z E z = h 2 E z; @ 2 z B z = h 2 2 B z; (2.7) where h 2 i alo determined by the boundary condition. Then we havetwo dimenional Helmholtz equation: 4 T E z = g 2 E z; 4 T B z = g 2 2 B z; (2.8) where g 2 = k 2 h 2 : (2.9) Now we dene two function F from E z and B z with g 2 6=0a F (r;t)= g 2 6=0 [F (r;t)+c:c:]= 4 g 2 6=0 [ ~ F (r) e i!t +c:c:]; (2.20)

where F = E z =g 2 ; F 2 = B z =g 2 2 : (2.2) The function F and their component F atify the ame equation a the z component of the eld: 4F = @ F c 2 ; 4 T F = g 2 @ F (2.22) t From Eq. (2.2) and (2.22) the component F i a olution of the Poion equation 4 T F = E z ; 4 T F 2 = B z (2.23) and then the function 4 T F atify 4 T F = 4 T F 2 = g 2 6=0 (g 2 F +c:c:)= g 2 2 6=0 (g 2 2 F 2 +c:c:)= g 2 6=0 (E z +c:c:); g 2 2 6=0 (B z +c:c:): (2.24) On the other hand, if there i a component E z or B z with g 2 = 0, Eq. (2.8) reduce to the two dimenional Laplace equation: 4 T E z =0or4 T B z =0. Now dene E 0z and B 0z a E 0z = (E z +c:c:); B 0z = (B z +c:c:); (2.25) g 2 =0 g2 2 =0 which atify 4 T E 0z =0; 4 T B 0z =0: (2.26) Then we have a ueful expreion for E z and B z ; for any E z and B z there exit function F given by Eq. (2.20) and function E 0z and B 0z are given by Eq. (2.25) uch that E z = 4 T F + E 0z ; B z = 4 T F 2 + B 0z : (2.27) It i worth emphaizing again that the function F are contructed with the component E z and B z with g 2 6= 0, while E 0z and B 0z conit of the component with g 2 =0. Uing Eq. (2.27) and dening F by we can rewrite Eq. (2.2) a F = e z F ; (2.28) 4 T E rrf +r@ t F 2 = rre0z +r@ t B 0z ; (2.29) 4 T B c 2 r@ tf rrf 2 = c 2r@ te 0z rrb 0z ; (2.30) where E 0z = e z E 0z and B 0z = e z B 0z. Let u dene E 0 and B 0 a the quantitie in the parenthee at the left hand ide in Eq. (2.29) and (2.30), repectively. The reult of thi ection are then ummarized in the following theorem. 5

Theorem : The eld can be decompoed into three component a follow: E = rrf r@ t F 2 +E 0 ; B= c 2r@ tf +rrf 2 +B 0 ; (2.3) where E 0 and B 0 atify 4 T E 0 = rre 0z +r@ t B 0z ; 4 T B 0 = c 2r@ te 0z rrb 0z : (2.32) Theorem play a central role in performing eld quantization in thi paper. Take the z component of Eq. (2.3), we nd that the z component of E 0 and B 0 are given by E 0z and B 0z in Eq. (2.27), repectively. Furthermore, Eq. (2.32) i conitent with Eq. (2.2). Let u conider the phyical meaning of the above decompoition formula. Firt it i worth emphaizing that each term in Eq. (2.3) i a olution to Maxwell' equation. That i, each term containing F (F term) atie Eq. (2.) - (2.4), which i eaily hown by uing the fact that F atie the wave equation (2.22). A a reult, the third term E 0 ; B 0 i alo a olution to Maxwell' equation, o that it atie Eq. (2.2), a mentioned above. Next take a particular example of the boundary condition atifying E 0z ;B 0z = 0. Then the eld E 0 ; B 0 decribe o-called the TEM (tranvere electromagnetic) mode [5]. Since the F term ha no z component of the magnetic eld, it become TM (tranvere magnetic), while the F 2 term become TE (tranvere electric), becaue it doe not contain the z component of the electric eld. In the above particular cae where E 0z ;B 0z = 0, Maxwell' equation for the eld E 0 ; B 0 reduce to r T E 0 =0; r T E 0 =0; r T B 0 =0; r T B 0 =0; r z E 0 +@ t B 0 =0; r z B 0 c 2@ te 0 =0: (2.33) 3 Determination of Function F We are conidering here the cavity encloed by a circular cylindrical wall with radiu a and height L: r < a,0 <z<l. We aume that the cavity ha perfectly conducting wall at z =0;L and at r = a. The tangential component of the electric eld Ej tan and the normal component of the magnetic eld Bj norm mut accordingly vanih at the boundary of the cavity. The above boundary condition reduce to that for the z component E z =0; @ r B z =0; (r=a); (3.) B z =0; @ z E z =0; (z=0; L): (3.2) 6

It i eay to get the econd condition in Eq. (3.) if we take the ' component of Eq. (2.4). Equation (2.) lead to the econd condition in Eq. (3.2). Before obtaining the component E z and B z,we how that the folowing lemma. Lemma : E 0 =0,B 0 =0. Proof: Firt we how that E 0z ;B 0z =0. Conider the component E 0z, which atie the Laplace equation 4 T E 0z = 0 [ee Eq. (2.26)] with the boundary condition E 0z =0at the boundary (r = a). Then we havee 0z = 0; thi i a well known property of the Laplace equation. Next conider the component B 0z atifying 4 T B 0z = 0 with the boundary condition @ r B 0z =0(r=a). Then B 0z mut be a contant, i.e., independent of the variable r and ': B 0z = f(z; t). Applying the two-dimenional Gau' theorem to rb 0 = r T B 0T +@ z B 0z =0, we get @ z B 0z = 0, becaue B 0r =0(r=a) and, a a reult, B 0z i independent of the variable r, ', and z. On the other hand, B 0z mut be zero at z =0;L, which lead to B 0z =0. A mentioned in the preceding ection, the eld E 0 ; B 0 become TEM atifying Eq. (2.33), becaue E 0z ;B 0z = 0. There exit no TEM in the preent cavity. That i, from Eq. (2.33) we haver T B 0 = 0 and r T B 0 = 0. A a reult, there exit a function ' uch that B 0 = r T ', which give B 0 =0by the boundary condition at r = a. Similarly, we getavector function A uch that E 0 = ra. The boundary condition lead u to E 0 =0. Q.E.D. Since E 0 ; B 0 = 0, Theorem how that the eld i contructed from the function F. Conequently, from Eq. (2.20), the eld only contain the component with g 2 6=0. Moreover, it i eay to prove that g 2 > 0by uing Gau' theorem and the boundary condition. Next we olve the Helmholtz equation (2.5) for the component E z and B z under the boundary condition (3.) and (3.2). Since g 2 > 0, the olution i given by E z (r;t)=c (t)j m ( r=a) e im' co(nz=l); B z (r;t)=c 2 (t)j m ( 2 r=a) e im' in(nz=l); (3.3) where the mode index i =(m; ; n) (m=0;;2;; =;2;3;;n =0;;2;), J m i the Beel function of the rt kind, m i the th zero point of J m, and 2 m2 i the th zero point ofjm, 0 the derivative ofj m. It follow from Eq. (2.4) that C (t) / exp( i! t). From the olution (3.3) we have which give 4 T E z = (k 2 (n=l) 2 )E z = ( =a) 2 E z ; 4 T B z = (k 2 2 (n=l) 2 )B z = ( 2 =a) 2 B z ; (3.4) g 2 =( =a) 2 ; k 2 =( =a) 2 +(n=l) 2 : (3.5) Let u next obtain the function F, which are dened in Eq. (2.20) and (2.2); they are given by F (r;t)= a2 E z (r;t) 2 h! i a (t) (r); 2" 0 7

where we haveintroduced a and : F 2 (r;t)= a2 B z (r;t) h!2 2 i a 2 (t) 2 (r); (3.6) 2 2" 0 a (t) =a (0)e i!t ; (3.7) (r;t)=c J m ( r=a) e im' co(nz=l); (3.8) 2(r;t)=c 2 J m ( 2 r=a) e im' in(nz=l); (3.9) where c are normalization contant. The function have the orthonormality property, which i ued in quantization in the next ection. Lemma 2: where R c dr = R cavity Z c dr (r) 0 (r) = 2 jc j 2 V 0; (3.0) rdrd'dz, V i the cavity volume, and m = J 2 m+ ( m); 2 m2 = J 2 m( m2 ) J 2 m+( m2 ): (3.) Here the quantity co(nz=l) in Eq. (3.8) mut be changed to = p 2 when n =0. Proof: The orthonormality property (3.0) i eaily derived from the following equality for the Beel function: Z a 0 dr rj m ( m r=a)j m ( m0 r=a) = 2 a2 0: (3.2) To prove Eq. (3.2), let u rt oberve the following two integral [6] Z dx xj m ( i x)j m ( j x) = h i i J m+ ( i )J m ( j ) j J m+ ( j )J m ( i ) 0 Z 0 = dx xj 2 m( i x) = 2 2 i 2 i 2 j 2 j h i J 0 m ( i)j m ( j )+ j J m ( i )J 0 m ( j) i (3.3) hj 2 m( i ) J m ( i )J m+ ( i ) i h J 2 m( i ) J 2 m+( i ) 2J 0 m( i )J m+ ( i ) i ; (3.4) = 2 where i (i =;2;) i a poitive real number and i 6= j. Conidering that m i the th zero point ofj m (x) and that J m ( m )+J m+ ( m )= 0, from Eq. (3.3) and (3.4), we have Z 0 dx xj m ( m x)j m ( m0 x) = 2 m 0; (3.5) where m i given by Eq. (3.). If we change the variable x to r=a, Eq. (3.5) give Eq. (3.2) for =. Similarly, Eq. (3.3) and (3.4) lead to Z 0 dx xj m ( m2 x)j m ( m0 2x) = 2 m2 0; (3.6) where m2 i given by Eq. (3.). Equation (3.6) give u Eq. (3.2) for = 2. Q.E.D. 8

4 Vector Mode Function and Field Quantization After dening the vector mode function, we quantize the eld and obtain the quantized Hamiltonian. The mode function are contructed according to the decompoition formula given in Eq. (2.3) In the cavity with the perfectly conducting wall, the decompoition (2.3) in Theorem reduce to E = rrf r@ t F 2 ; B= c 2r@ tf +rrf 2 ; (4.) becaue of E 0 ; B 0 = 0 [ee Lemma ]. Subtituting the function F in Eq. (3.6) into E in Eq. (4.), we nd E(r;t)=i h! where the vector mode function u are given by 2" 0 h a (t)u (r) a (t)u (r) i ; (4.2) u = rre z ; u 2 =i! 2 re z 2 : (4.3) Similarly, ubtituting F into B and conidering the equality we obtain ru =k 2 re z ; (4.4) h h i a (t)ru (r)+a (t)ru (r) : (4.5) 2" 0! B(r;t)= Before obtaining the quantized eld and Hamiltonian, let u preent ome propertie of the mode function. Lemma 3: ru =0; (4.6) (4 + k 2 )u =0; (4.7) u j tan =0; ru j norm =0; (on wall); (4.8) Z c dru (r) u 0 0(r) = 0 0; (4.9) Proof: We give a proof of the orthonormality property (4.9), becaue it i obviou to prove the other equation. From Eq. (4.3), the mode function u i rewritten a u = r(re z ) 4e z =k 2 e z +r(@ z ); (4.0) which give u u 0 = h k 2 k2 0 k 2 h2 0 i 0 h +k 2 0 zh @ (@z ) i + r 0 (@z )r@ z 0 i : (4.) 9

Taking into account Gau' theorem and the boundary condition, we nd that the lat two term in Eq. (4.) have no eect on the volume integration of u u 0. Equation (4.) give the orthonormality relation for u : Z c dru (r)u 0 (r)= 0; (4.2) where we have ued Eq. (3.0) and et 2c c = 2 a 2 V 2 : (4.3)!2 In the cae of u 2,we make ue of the equality (re z 2)(re z 0 2) = e z 2 (rre z 0 2)+r he i z 2 (re z 0 2) = 2 0 2 a 2 2 2+r( 0 2 r T 0 2): (4.4) The orthonormality property ofu 2 i then obtained from Eq. (3.0) if we et the normalization contant: 2a c 2 = 2 V 2 2 : (4.5) 2! 2 2 Finally we how that the mode function u and u 0 2 are orthogonal to each other. Since u 2 ha no z component, we ee that u u 0 2 = i! 0 2 k 2 e z + r@ z (re z 0 2) = i! 0 2r(@ z ) (re z 0 2) = i! 0 2r which ha no eect on the volume integration of u u 0 2. Q.E.D. h (@z )(re z 0 2) i ; (4.6) We are now ready to carry out the eld quantization. To get the quantized eld the function a (t) are regarded a annihilation operator, which annihilate photon with indice and atify the commutation relation: [a (t);a y 0 0(t)] = 0 0; (4.7) where a y 0 0(t) are creation operator. Then the eld given by Eq. (4.2) and (4.5) become operator. The quantized electromagnetic Hamiltonian H R i obtained by uing the equality Z c dr (ru (r)) (ru 0 0(r)) = k2 0 0 Thee are ummarized in the following theorem. Theorem 2: The quantized eld and the Hamiltonian are given by E(r;t)=i B(r;t)= H R = 2 h! h! Z c dru (r) u 0 0(r): (4.8) 2" 0 h a (t)u (r) a y (t)u (r)i ; (4.9) h h a (t)ru (r)+a y (r)i 2" 0! (t)ru : (4.20) a y a + a a y = : (4.2) 0 h! a y a + 2

Theorem 2 will play a fundamental role when weinvetigate the electromagnetic property of a phyical ytem in the circular cylindrical cavity. There are alo important iue in the preent cavity including, for example, pontaneou (timulated) emiion, aborption, the atomic energy hift, and the Caimir eect; they will be invetigated with the help of Theorem 2. It i neceary to expand the eld in term of the vector mode function a in Theorem 2. According to Fourier analyi, the eld can be expanded in term of, for intance, the periodic function a in ordinary quantum electrodynamic. However, in thi cae, the operator a and a y cannot decribe the phyical photon. Conider the ituation where the eld conit of only one mode correponding to the photon with a u, where u atie the periodic boundary condition. Thi mut be impoible, becaue thi eld doe not atify the boundary condition; the photon i then ctitiou. 5 Concluion The quantization procedure of the eld in the cavity without E 0 ; B 0 i a follow: (a) obtain the decompoition formula (2.3) in the circular cylindrical coordinate; (b) olve the Helmholtz equation (2.5) for the component E z and B z under the boundary condition (3.) and (3.2); (c) determine the function F, which are the olution of the Poion equation (2.23), from E z ;B z ; (d) ubtitute F into the decompoition formula (2.3) and obtain the vector mode function atifying the orthonormality property (4.9); (e) then we arrive at the quantized eld and Hamiltonian in Theorem 2. A ha been hown explicitly in Theorem 2 in Sec. 4, the energy h! of the photon depend on the polarization index a well a the wave number index. Thi i one of the characteritic of the circular cylindrical cavity. The photon energy i independent ofthe polarization index in a rectangular cavity and in free pace. In the entire proce of quantization, the decompoition formula in Theorem play the eential role. We mut nd uch a formula in an appropriate coordinate ytem if we tudy other type of cavitie. Alo, if a cavity allow the third term E 0 ; B 0 in (2.3), we haveto contruct a methodology to deal with the problem. We hope to dicu the quantization of electromagnetic eld inide a pherical cavity in a future publication. Acknowledgment We would like to thank Prof. Y. Ezawa, Dr. R. Ray, Dr. G. Gat, Dr. S. Kobayahi, Dr. Kurennoy, and Mr. K. Ohhiro for numerou valuable dicuion. We are alo grateful to Prof. M. S. Kim for bringing ome of the reference to our attention. Reference [] E. M. Purcell, Phy. Rev. 69, 68 (946); D. Kleppner, Phy. Rev. Lett. 47, 233 (98).

[2] G. Barton and N. S. J. Fawcett, Phy. Report 70, (988); P. Meytre, ibid 29, 243 (992); H. Walther, ibid 29, 263 (992); Cavity Quantum Electrodynamic, edited by P. R. Berman (Academic Pre, New York, 994); P. W. Milonni, The Quantum Vacuum: An Introduction to Quantum Electrodynamic (Academic Pre, New York, 994). [3] C. K. Carniglia and L. Mandel, Phy. Rev. D 3, 280 (97); P. W. Milonni, Phy. Rev. A 25, 35 (982); E. A. Power and T. Thirunamachandran, Phy. Rev. A 25, 2473 (982). [4] K. Kakazu and Y. S. Kim, Phy. Rev. A 50, 830 (994). [5] J. D. Jackon, Claical Electrodynamic (John Wiley and Son, New York, 975). [6] G. N. Waton, A Treatice on the Theory of Beel Function (Cambridge Univerity Pre, Cambridge, 962). 2