Vapour Liquid Equilibrium in Asymmetric Mixtures of n-alkanes with Ethane

Similar documents
Thermophysical Properties of Ethane from Cubic Equations of State

Thermodynamic Properties of Refrigerant R116 from Cubic Equations of State

A modification of Wong-Sandler mixing rule for the prediction of vapor-liquid equilibria in binary asymmetric systems

Modelling the Solubility of Solid Aromatic Compounds in Supercritical Fluids

EQUATION OF STATE DEVELOPMENT

CALCULATION OF THE COMPRESSIBILITY FACTOR AND FUGACITY IN OIL-GAS SYSTEMS USING CUBIC EQUATIONS OF STATE

REV. CHIM. (Bucureºti) 58 Nr

SOFTWARE INTELIGENT PACKAGE FOR PHASE EQULIBRIA (PHEQ) IN SYSTEMS APPLIED IN CHEMISTRY AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING

MODELING OF PHASE EQUILIBRIA FOR BINARY AND TERNARY MIXTURES OF CARBON DIOXIDE, HYDROGEN AND METHANOL

Modeling Vapor Liquid Equilibrium of Binary and Ternary Systems of CO 2 + Hydrocarbons at High-Pressure Conditions

Phase Equilibria of binary mixtures by Molecular Simulation and PR-EOS: Methane + Xenon and Xenon + Ethane

Accuracy of vapour ^ liquid critical points computed from cubic equations of state

SOLUBILITY OF CO 2 IN BRANCHED ALKANES IN ORDER TO EXTEND THE PPR78 MODEL TO SUCH SYSTEMS

Vapor liquid equilibrium of carbon dioxide with ethyl caproate, ethyl caprylate and ethyl caprate at elevated pressures

Solubility of solids in supercritical fluids using equations of state - excess Gibbs free energy models.

PETE 310 Lectures # 36 to 37

Generalized binary interaction parameters in the Wong Sandler mixing rules for mixtures containing n-alkanols and carbon dioxide

ScienceDirect. Modelling CO 2 Water Thermodynamics Using SPUNG Equation of State (EoS) concept with Various Reference Fluids

Prediction of phase equilibria in waterralcoholralkane systems

The simultaneous prediction of vapor-liquid equilibrium and excess enthalpy. Kwon, Jung Hun. Thermodynamics and properties lab.

A Cubic Hard-Core Equation of State

Vapor liquid equilibria of carbon dioxide with diethyl oxalate, ethyl laurate, and dibutyl phthalate binary mixtures at elevated pressures

Preliminary Evaluation of the SPUNG Equation of State for Modelling the Thermodynamic Properties of CO 2 Water Mixtures

PVTpetro: A COMPUTATIONAL TOOL FOR ISOTHERM TWO- PHASE PT-FLASH CALCULATION IN OIL-GAS SYSTEMS

Peng-Robinson Equation of State Predictions for Gas Condensate Before and After Lumping

Vapor liquid equilibria of carbon dioxide with ethyl benzoate, diethyl succinate and isoamyl acetate binary mixtures at elevated pressures

Vapor-liquid equilibria for the binary mixtures of methanol+ cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME)

Prediction of surface tension of binary mixtures with the parachor method

Zhen-hua Chen, Zhen Yao, Yan Li, Kun Cao,* and Zhi-ming Huang

"Energy Applications: Impact of Data and Models"

THERMODYNAMIC CONSISTENCY TESTS FOR PHASE EQUILIBRIUM IN LIQUID SOLUTE+SUPERCRITICAL SOLVENT MIXTURES

Comparison of different mixing rules for prediction of density and residual internal energy of binary and ternary Lennard Jones mixtures

Modelling of methane gas hydrate incipient conditions via translated Trebble-Bishnoi-Salim equation of state

PREDICTION OF SATURATED LIQUID VOLUMES FROM A MODIFIED VAN DER WAALS EQUATION. By Charles R. Koppany

Phase Behavior Modeling of Asymmetric n-alkane + Aromatic and Naphthenic Hydrocarbon Mixtures. Sourabh Ahitan

Cohesion Factor Relations for Cubic Equations of State: Soave-Redlich-Kwong Equation of State

Cooling Temperatures of Binary Mixed Refrigerants: Vapor-Liquid-Liquid Equilibrium versus Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium

4.3 CONCLUSION: HOW TO CHOOSE A MODEL The right questions Ionic liquids What is the property of interest?

Review Article. VLE Properties from ISM Equation of State: Application to Pure and Mixture

PREDICTION OF VAPOR PRESSURES AND MIXTURE VLE FROM A SECOND MODIFICATION OF THE VAN DER WAALS EQUATION. Part 3

VLE Measurements for Asymmetric Mixtures of Fischer-Tropsch Hydrocarbons

On the Boyle temperature

New correlation for hydrogen-natural gas mixture compressibility factor

Available online at Energy Procedia 00 (2011) TCCS-6

Rigorous calculation of LNG flow reliefs using the GERG-2004 equation of state

Phase equilibria experiments and calculations for carbon dioxide + methanol binary system

Using Supercritical Fluid Extraction

Application of Simulated Annealing Technique to Non-Linear Optimization of PC-SAFT for Petroleum Reservoir Fluids

Overall: 75 ECTS: 7.0

Calculation of Solid Solubility of Complex Molecules in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide using a Solution Model Approach

A generalized set of correlations for plus fraction characterization

SOLUBILITY CALCULATION OF AROMATIC COMPOUNDS IN SUPERCRITICAL CO 2 BY GROUP CONTRIBUTION METHODS

Fluid Phase Equilibria 4639 (2001) Surface tension of pure heavy n-alkanes: a corresponding states approach

Published in: Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. DOI: /je Document Version Peer reviewed version

CHAPTER SIX THERMODYNAMICS Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium in a Binary System 6.2. Investigation of the Thermodynamic Properties of Pure Water

Comparison of the GERG-2008 and Peng-Robinson Equations of State for Natural Gas Mixtures

ChBE BIBLE. Robert A. Pinnick. 28 April 2006

Prediction of Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium of Polypropylene Oxide Solution Systems by Cubic Equations of State

Calorimetry in the near-critical and supercritical regions. Nitrous oxide + hydrocarbon mixtures*

Phase equilibrium studies of impure CO 2 systems to underpin developments of CCS technologies

Yutaek Seo. Subsea Engineering

THE PROPERTIES OF GASES AND LIQUIDS

CH.7 Fugacities in Liquid Mixtures: Models and Theories of Solutions

Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics

A Thermodynamic Study of Methane Hydrates Formation In Glass Beads

Viscosity and Liquid Density of Asymmetric n-alkane Mixtures: Measurement and Modeling 1

Bubble Pressure Measurement and Modeling for n-alkane + Aromatic Hydrocarbon Binary Mixtures. Qingchen Liu

Status and results of group contribution methods

Chemical and Engineering Thermodynamics

VAN DER WAALS MIXING RULES FOR CUBIC EQUATIONS OF STATE. APPLICATIONS FOR SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTION MODELLING

Surface Tension Prediction for Liquid Mixtures

Prediction of Asphaltene Instability under Gas Injection with the PC-SAFT Equation of State

Reservoir Eng FOB :18 Page i Second Edition

r sat,l T sr sat,l T rf rh Ž 4.

An augmented hard core equation of state generalized in terms of T,, P, and o

Calculation of Phase Equilibrium of Natural Gases with the Peng-Robinson and PC-SAFT Equations of State

Evaluation of the SPUNG Equation of State for use in Carbon Capture and Storage Modelling

Prediction of methanol content in natural gas with the GC-PR-CPA model Hajiw, Martha; Chapoy, Antonin; Coquelet, Christophe; Lauermann, Gerhard

Application of Crossover Theory to the SAFT-VR Equation of State: SAFT-VRX for Pure Fluids

Comparing Some Models for Predicting the Density of Liquid Mixtures

Analyzing solubility of acid gas and light alkanes in triethylene glycol

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Group contribution methodsðideal tools for the synthesis and design of separation processes*

An extension of the group contribution method for estimating thermodynamic and transport properties. Part IV. Noble gas mixtures with polyatomic gases

Predictive Equation of State

Preparation of Psychrometric Charts for Alcohol Vapours in Nitrogen

P1: IML/FFX P2: IML/FFX QC: IML/FFX T1: IML AT029-FM AT029-Manual AT029-Manual-v8.cls December 11, :59. Contents

Fluid Phase Equilibria

Vapor liquid equilibria for the binary system 2,2 dimethylbutane + 1,1 dimethylpropyl methyl ether (TAME) at , , and 338.

Condensed Phase Ethanol Conversion to Higher Alcohols. Tyler L. Jordison, Carl T. Lira, and Dennis J. Miller

Optimization of the Sulfolane Extraction Plant Based on Modeling and Simulation

MODELING THE PHASE EQUILIBRIUM OF THE CLOVE OIL + CO 2 SYSTEM

Fluid data consistency testing incorporation into the ThermoDataEngine

Solubility of Supercritical CO 2 in Polystyrene during Foam Formation via Statistical Associated Fluid Theory (SAFT) Equation of State

Supporting Information

Temperature Prediction for High Pressure High Temperature Condensate Gas Flow Through Chokes

Aspen Dr. Ziad Abuelrub

QUESTION 1 The boiling temperature of hydrocarbons making up crude oil depends on the strength of intermolecular forces known as:

DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SRM UNIVERSITY COURSE PLAN

Equations of State. Equations of State (EoS)

Transcription:

Turk J Chem 26 (22), 481 489. c TÜBİTAK Vapour Liquid Equilibrium in Asymmetric Mixtures of n-alkanes with Ethane Anca DUTA Transylvania University, Chemistry Dept., I. Maniu 5, RO-22 Brasov-ROMANIA e-mail: a.duta@info.unitbv.ro Dan GEANA Politehnica Univ., Dept. of Applied Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Politehnicii 289, Bucharest-ROMANIA Received 24.1.2 The paper presents a vapour liquid equilibria study in binary mixtures of n-alkanes with high dimensional asymmetry. Each mixture contains ethane and alkanes higher than eicosane. Calculations were done using two equations of state, Peng-Robinson (PR) and Soave (SRK), in combination with van der Waals mixing rules, corrected with two interaction parameters. A limited temperature dependence of the interaction parameters was found. The correlations between the interaction parameters and the number of carbon atoms of the higher n-alkane led to equations valid for systems ethane + C 3 up to C 44. The results of the prediction calculations were good, both with PR and SRK. Key Words: Vapour liquid equilibrium, Interaction parameters, Asymmetric mixtures Introduction Fluid phase equilibrium in binary n-alkanes mixtures of very large size difference was studied in the last decade to find an answer to the practical problems arising in high depth hyperbaric reservoirs of oil and natural gas or in the gas-slurry processes in the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Experimental data are reported for systems of low alkanes in supercritical state (methane, ethane and propane) and high normal or branched alkanes, up to hexacontane. Describing the vapour liquid equilibria (VLE) in these systems is a challenge for any given model, and different attempts are made mainly because the prediction capacities of the models are rather poor and empirical. For example, the molecular simulation based on a united-atom force field is considered in describing the VLE of the system ethane-tetracontane at constant pressure, [1]. Calculations based on the description of the liquid phase through Excess Gibbs Energy models, G E, and the vapour phase using an equation of state, EOS, (G E EOS) are also reported to be successful considering the system ethane-eicosane at different temperatures [2]. More recently, the van der Waals equation of state has been successfully used with the thermodynamically consistent Wong-Sandler mixing rules to determine the critical properties of high alkanes, [3,4]. Equations of state (EOS) for long chain alkanes based on the statistical-mechanical 481

perturbation theory have lately been reported, as is the case with the three parameters equation introduced by Eslami, [5], for n-alkanes up to eicosane. However, the prediction of the VLE is widely made using the cubic equations of state in combination with mixing rules including interaction parameters. In this paper we examine the VLE of the binary systems of ethane and higher n-alkanes components (from eicosane to tetratetracontane). In the VLE calculations we use two phenomenological EOS: Peng- Robinson (PR, [6]) and Soave (SRK, [7]). We develop correlations between interaction parameters and the number of carbon atoms of the higher n-alkane and we use the estimated values in the VLE prediction calculations. Considering mediated values of the parameters on the investigated temperature range, prediction calculations are also made. Review of the Models The standard cubic EOS may be generalised using the following expression: The parameters u and w have certain values for each EOS: P = RT v b a(t ) v 2 + uvb + wb 2 (1) PR:u=2w=-1 SRK:u=1w= Both equations are mentioned in specialised studies as suitable for describing VLE of hydrocarbons, but both were originally developed for systems of short chain alkanes. The temperature dependent parameter, a(t) and the parameter b are calculated using the critical parameters T c,p c and the acentric factor, ω: a = R2 T 2 c P c Ω a β(t r ) β(t r )=[1+m(1 T.5 r )] 2 (2) m = α 1 + α 2 ω α 3 ω 2 b = R T c P c Ω b (2a) The parameters Ω a,ω b, α 1, α 2 and α 3 depend on the EOS and are presented in Table 1 for the cubic equations that we used: Table 1. Characteristic values of the parameters in EOS EOS Ω a Ω b α 1 α 2 α 3 SRK.42747.866.48 1.574.176 PR.45724.778.37464 1.5422.2699 For binary mixtures the following mixing rules are used: 482

2 2 a = X i X j a ij a ij =(a i a j ) 1/2 (1 k ij ) i, j = 1, 2 (3) i=1 j=1 2 2 b = X i X j b ij b ij = 1 2 (b i + b j )(1 h ij ) (4) i=1 j=1 The mixing rules employ two interaction parameters, k ij and h ij. The values of the interaction parameters are calculated by minimising an objective function in conjunction with a Bubble P isothermal algorithm: FOBP = NEXP i=1 ( P exp i Pi calc P exp i )2 (5) The average absolute deviation in pressure estimation, AADP, is used for estimating the quality of the VLE calculations. For a data set with NEXP experimental points, AADP is AADP = NEXP 1 NEXP i=1 P exp i P calc i P exp i 1 (6) Database Different specialised sources mention and use different values for the critical parameters of the components. In this paper the critical parameters of ethane are those given by Reid [8] and the values for the heavy components are calculated using the correlations of Magoulas and Tassios [9]. In the VLE calculations we used literature data, presented in Table 2. Table 2. Experimental database for binary systems of ethane and n-alkanes n-alkane T / K NEXP Ref. 323.2; 373.2; 4 6; 6; 7 [1] eicosane (C 2 H 44 ) 323.2; 373.2 9; 9 [1]+[11] 3; 35; 423.2; 1; 14; 9; 6; 4; 4 [11] 45; 473.2; 572.9 docosan (C 22 H 46 ) 31; 33; 35 5; 9; 7 [12] tetracosane (C 24 H 5 ) 33; 34; 35 7; 7; 4 [13] 348.2; 373.2; 423.2 1; 7 ; 7 [1] octacosane (C 28 H 58 ) 373.2 11 [1]+[14] 473.2; 573.2 4; 4 [14] hexatriacontane (C 36 H 74 ) 373.2; 423.2 7; 6 [1] tetratetracontane (C 44 H 9 ) 373.2; 423.3 9; 6 [1] 483

Results and Discussion The VLE calculations were done using PR and SRK EOS coupled with mixing rules corrected first with one and then with two interaction parameters. The results are presented in Table 3. Both equations of state provide good results, and the use of a second interaction parameter (h ij ) leads to a significant improvement in the quality of the calculations; therefore, further prediction calculations were carried out by using only two interaction parameters. Table 3. Results of the VLE calculations T/K EOS: PR EOS: SRK k ij h ij AADP/ % k ij h ij AADP / % ethane n-eicosane 3.176.247.179 1.1.61.188.231.117 1.18 1.2 323.2 -.253.179.29 7.37.67 -.24.216.211 7.39.77 323.2 -.167.324.258 8.44 1.71 -.139.316.231 8.37 1.38 35 -.17.292.237 9.45 1.26 -.71.292.237 9.45 1.26 373.2 -.379.148.218 9.34.88 -.29.26.218 9.53.81 373.2 -.85.312.271 8.88 2.7 -.42.363.266 8.92 2.1 4 -.34.314.237 9.4 1.7 -.2.329.36 8.66 1.28 423.2 -.38.275.31 6.36.46 -.252.346.34 6.33.45 423.2 -.234.325.328 6.81.95 -.176.4.323 6.76.94 45 -.6.48.418 8.11.79 -.4.441.387 7.67.59 473.2 -.467.443.346 3.33.84 -.41.52.33 3.27.85 572.9.56.649.51.76.53.635.742.32.73.47 Overall -.113.326.263 6.59.91 -.153.352.279 7.58.99 ethane n-docosane 31.245.247.19 3.38 3.37.249.245 -.72 4.9 4.7 33 -.22.32.22 12.26 3.51.5.346.192 12.21 3.35 35 -.159.281.22 11.72 2.27 -.13.32.215 11.83 2.25 Overall.21.283.147 9.12 3.6.41.34.167 9.36 3.22 484

Table 3. Continued 33 -.125.351 34 -.136.351 35 -.172.254 Overall -.144.319 348.2 -.487.98 373.2 -.534.18 373.2 -.489.58 423.2 -.971.34 473.2 -.971.34 573.2 -.896.3 Overall -.683.41 373.2 -.777.37 423.2 -.745.27 Overall -.761.122 373.2 -.111.138 423.2 -.551 -.172 Overall -.831 -.17 ethane n-tetracosane 15.49 -.83.231 6.2.46 15.74 -.93.231 6.25.35 9.87 -.133.244 3.41.299 13.7 -.13.24 5.23.352 ethane n-octacosane 6.8 -.432.198.94.153 6.81 -.481.173 1.19.12 6.8 -.431.178 1.81.133 3.81 -.656.288 1.73.125 3.81 -.893.288 1.73.97 2.13 -.693.256.83.13 5.26 -.598.219 1.66.121 ethane n-hexatriacontane 7.56 -.682.183.65.12 7.85 -.65.245 1.14.38 7.71 -.666.214.9.214 ethane n-tetratetracontane 1.69 -.974.234 1.4.226 1.88 -.37.162.74 -.117 6.26 -.672.198.89.54.225.216.234.225.188.178.173.23.264.23.21.166.227.196.23.137.17 14.99 5.12 15.22 6.28 9.92 3.37 13.38 4.92 6.15.9 6.86 1.29 6.87 1.85 5.93.68 3.75 1.71 1.79.7 5.22 1.21 7.62.7 7.81 1.13 7.71.91 1.76 1.9 1.51.72 6.14.91 The values of the interaction parameter have weak temperature dependence. Considering this, we calculated temperature mediated values of k ij and h ij for each ethane + n-alkane system. These values were tested in VLE prediction calculations and the global results are presented in Table 4. Based on the results presented in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, we found correlations between the interaction parameters and the number of carbon atoms of the heavy component, n C,shown by Eq. (6) and (7). Functions of second degree did not improve significantly the quality of the correlation. 485

Table 4. Results of the VLE prediction for binary systems of ethane - n-alkane with n C carbon atoms AADP PR /% AADP SRK /% n C * ** * ** 2 3.46 4.76 5.6 5.81 22 5.6 3.5 6.23 3.71 24 5.31 6.94 5.66 6.26 28 3.79 5.19 3.15 3.64 36 1.54 1.73 1.48 1.95 44 1.85 1.97 1.86 1.85 Overall 3.5 4.1 4. 3.87 using interaction parameters mediated on the temperature interval (Table 2) using interaction parameters calculated with eq. (6) and (7) Figure 1. Temperature mediated values of k ij. (Reference data from Table 3) Figure 2. Temperature mediated values of h ij. (Reference data from Table 3) PR k ij =.584.138 n C h ij =.236.8 n C SRK k ij =.561-.113 n C h ij =.2647.3 n C (6a) (6b) (7a) (7b) 486

The interaction parameters calculated from eq. (6) and eq. (7) can be used to predict the parameters of the EOS and the VLE in the systems ethane + n-alkane. The results are also tabulated in Table 4. Using PR and SRK we obtained the same quality results and this work indicates that by neglecting the temperature dependence of the interaction parameters one can obtain only results of average quality. For one temperature, T = 373.2K, we found a new set of correlations (far better results were obtained choosing polynomials of second degree): PR k ij =.132.76 n C +1.44 1 4 n 2 C h ij =.392.226 n C +4.41 1 5 n 2 C SRK k ij =.1619.89 n C +1.31 1 4 n 2 C h ij =.665.35 n C +4.73 1 5 n 2 C (8a) (8b) (9a) (9b) The average results of these prediction calculations are presented in Table 5. The results are good, better than those predicted using eq. (6) and eq. (7). This implies that even being weak, the temperature dependence of the interaction parameters is not to be neglected in highly accurate calculations. Table 5. Results of VLE prediction (T = 373.2K) using eq. (8) and (9) System ethane - AADP PR /% AADP SRK /% - n-eicosane 2.18 1.42 - n-octacosane 1.37 3.28 -n hexatriaconatene.75 4.68 -n tetratetracosane 1.5 7.35 Overall 1.34 4.12 As an application, we present in Fig. 3, and Fig. 4 two VLE diagrams calculated for highly asymmetric mixtures, using predicted values of the interaction parameters and the experimental P-X data as reference. Figure 3. Phase equilibrium diagram. System ethane docosane (T=33K) using PR-EOS and calculated interaction parameters: line mediated on the temperature interval; dots using eq. (6); circles - experimental data. 487

Figure 4. P-X equilibrium diagram. System ethane n-tetratetracontane (T= 373.2K) using SRK and predicted interaction parameters: line eq. (9); dots eq. (7); squares - experimental data. Many VLE calculations for binary systems ethane + n-alkanes up to eicosane are presented in specialised studies and were previously presented by the authors [15]. The next step in this work was to extend the investigated domain with respect to n C considering all the binary mixtures of n-alkanes in which one component is ethane and the other ranges from propane to tetratetracontane. We developed correlations between the interaction parameters, k ij,h ij (temperature mediated) and n C, for the systems C 2 +C 3...44 : PR k ij =.1576.218 n C +5.251 5 n 2 C h ij =.91968 +.196 n C 2.971 5 n 2 C SRK k ij =.3633.28 n C + 4.628 1 5 n 2 C h ij =.12255 +.275 n C 2.177 1 6 n 2 C (1a) (1b) (11a) (11b) The quality of the correlations was tested in prediction calculations of the VLE. All the systems in the database were used in the calculations. Average AADP values were then calculated for each system and the results are tabulated in Table 6. The results of these calculations can be described as successful, considering the high asymmetry of the components. Table 6. Results of the VLE prediction, using eq. (1) and (11) System: Ethane - AADP PR /% AADP SRK /% - n-eicosane 5.3 6.32 - n-docosane 3.72 4.19 - n-tetracosane 7.13 7.19 - n-octacosane 5.17 5.15 -n hexatriaconatene 2.42 1.67 -n tetratetracosane 1.82 5.26 Overall 4.26 4.79 488

Conclusions Two cubic EOS (PR and SRK) used with standard mixing rules with two interaction parameters may describe the VLE in binary systems ethane + heavy n-alkanes from eicosane to tetratetracontane. The interaction parameters slightly depend on temperature, and prediction calculations done with mediated values (on the temperature interval) are of average quality. In this work we presented correlations between the interaction parameters and the number of carbon atoms in the heavy component molecule. The correlations are applicable for the systems ethane + C 2...44 and ethane + C 3...44. The prediction calculations done with these values led to good results. References 1. S. Nath, et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 37, 3195-322 (1998). 2. H. Orbey, S. I. Sandler, Fluid Phase Equilibria,132, 1-14 (1997). 3. M. Castier, S. Sandler, Chem.Eng.Sci.,52,3393, (1997). 4. M. Castier, S. Sandler, Chem.Eng.Sci.,52,3579, (1997). 5. H. Eslami, Fl. Ph. Equilib., 169, 19-3, (2). 6. D.Y.Peng,D.B.Robinson,Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 15, 59 (1976). 7. G.Soave, Chem.Eng.Sci.,27,1197-123 (1972). 8. R. C.Reid, J. M. Prausnitz, E. M. Pooling, Properties of Gases and Liquids, 4-rd. Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1988. 9. K. Magoulas, D. Tassios, Fluid Phase Equilibria, 56, 119 (199). 1. K. Gasem, et al., J.Chem.Eng.Data,34,187-191 (1989). 11. C. J. Peters, et al., Fluid Phase Equilibria, 41, 245-256 (1988). 12. C. J. Peters, J. L. de Roo, Fluid Phase Equilibria, 34, 287-38 (1987). 13. C. J. Peters, et al., J. Chem. Thermodynamics, 19, 395-45 (1987). 14. H. S. Huang et al., J. Chem Eng. Data, 33, 143-145 (1988). 15. A. Duta, PVT Properties and VLE Calculations for n-alkanes Systems, Ph. D., Politechnica University of Bucharest, Romania, 1997. 489