Locality, Realism, and the Quantum World Michael Raymer, Professor of Physics University of Oregon

Similar documents
Chemistry 271 Quantum Mechanics

Singlet State Correlations

Quantum Field Theory. Chapter Introduction. 8.2 The Many Particle State

How to use the simulator

Is Faster-Than-Light Communication Possible?

Quantum Entanglement, Bell s Theorem, and Reality

We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.!

PHYS 280 Week 7 Homework Summer Choose the better choice of all choices given.

Physics Capstone. Karsten Gimre May 19, 2009

PHYS 280 Week 7 Homework Summer Choose the better choice of all choices given.

Modern Physics notes Spring 2007 Paul Fendley Lecture 27

Lecture 8: Wave-Particle Duality. Lecture 8, p 2

Hardy s Paradox. Chapter Introduction

1.1.1 Bell Inequality - Spin correlation

Quantum Measurement and Bell s Theorem

Experiment 6 - Tests of Bell s Inequality

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 14 Sep 1999

Neutrinos Must be Tachyons

Limitations of Newtonian Physics

1 1D Schrödinger equation: Particle in an infinite box

MITOCW watch?v=0usje5vtiks

Bohmian particle trajectories contradict quantum mechanics

PHYS 280 Practice Final Exam Summer Choose the better choice of all choices given.

Are these states normalized? A) Yes

Closing the Debates on Quantum Locality and Reality: EPR Theorem, Bell's Theorem, and Quantum Information from the Brown-Twiss Vantage

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and Bell s inequalities

1 1D Schrödinger equation: Particle in an infinite box

Collapse versus correlations, EPR, Bell Inequalities, Cloning

3/10/11. Which interpreta/on sounds most reasonable to you? PH300 Modern Physics SP11

Quantum Mechanics - I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Lecture - 16 The Quantum Beam Splitter

Locality and simultaneous elements of reality

Review of Quantum Mechanics, cont.

Underneath the wave function

Bell s Theorem. Ben Dribus. June 8, Louisiana State University

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen thought-experiment and Bell s theorem

Notes - Special Relativity

EPR Paradox Solved by Special Theory of Relativity

Quantum mechanics and reality

Superposition - World of Color and Hardness

MITOCW watch?v=8osuq1yxcci

1. Griffiths Suppose two spin-1/2 particles are known to be in the singlet configuration.

The controlled-not (CNOT) gate exors the first qubit into the second qubit ( a,b. a,a + b mod 2 ). Thus it permutes the four basis states as follows:

PHYS 280 Practice Final Exam Summer Choose the better choice of all choices given.

COLLEGE PHYSICS. Chapter 30 ATOMIC PHYSICS

Quantum Entanglement. Chapter Introduction. 8.2 Entangled Two-Particle States

MATH4104: Quantum nonlinear dynamics. Lecture Two. Review of quantum theory.

Quantum correlations and group C -algebras

Ph 12b. Homework Assignment No. 3 Due: 5pm, Thursday, 28 January 2010

Chp 6: Atomic Structure

Entanglement. Michelle Victora Advisor: Paul G. Kwiat. Physics 403 talk: March 13, 2017

Quantum Physics & Reality

Properties of Elementary Particles

OPTI510R: Photonics. Khanh Kieu College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona Meinel building R.626

Counterfactuals in Quantum Mechanics arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 4 Sep 2007

The Building Blocks of Nature

Basic Quantum Mechanics Prof. Ajoy Ghatak Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

PHYS 3313 Section 001 Lecture #7

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen thought experiment and Bell s theorem

1 Polarization of Light

Wave function and Quantum Physics

Theory and Experiment

CHAPTER 3 The Experimental Basis of Quantum Theory

CHAPTER 3 Prelude to Quantum Theory. Observation of X Rays. Thomson s Cathode-Ray Experiment. Röntgen s X-Ray Tube

Physics 1C. Chapter 28 !!!!

Has CHSH-inequality any relation to EPR-argument?

CHAPTER 3 The Experimental Basis of Quantum

Substituting a qubit for an arbitrarily large amount of classical communication

How to Train Your Photon Dragon

Quantum Computers. Todd A. Brun Communication Sciences Institute USC

Physics 107 Final Exam May 6, Your Name: 1. Questions

Understanding the quantum Cheshire Cat experiment of Denkmayr et al.

Physics 1C. Lecture 27A

CONTENTS Page Rounding 3 Addition 4 Subtraction 6 Multiplication 7 Division 10 Order of operations (BODMAS)

SCH4U: History of the Quantum Theory

Introduction to Bell s theorem: the theory that solidified quantum mechanics

Advanced Optical Communications Prof. R. K. Shevgaonkar Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay

Wavelength (λ)- Frequency (ν)- Which of the following has a higher frequency?

Electronic Structure of Atoms. Chapter 6

EPR Paradox and Bell s Inequality

Comparing quantum and classical correlations in a quantum eraser

WHY DOES NONLOCALITY SUPPORT BOHM s THEORY?

Lamps, lasers and detectors - Misconceptions i in the interpretation i of

Lecture 4. QUANTUM MECHANICS FOR MULTIPLE QUBIT SYSTEMS

Quantum Entanglement, Quantum Cryptography, Beyond Quantum Mechanics, and Why Quantum Mechanics Brad Christensen Advisor: Paul G.

Quantum Measurements: some technical background

Short introduction to Quantum Computing

ACTIVITY 3 Introducing Energy Diagrams for Atoms

Counterfactuals in Quantum Mechanics

Erwin Schrödinger and his cat

Quantum Mechanics without Complex Numbers: A Simple Model for the Electron Wavefunction Including Spin. Alan M. Kadin* Princeton Junction, NJ

In a particular investigation the atomic spacing of the crystal is m and the electrons are accelerated through 3000 V.

Quantum Computing. Vraj Parikh B.E.-G.H.Patel College of Engineering & Technology, Anand (Affiliated with GTU) Abstract HISTORY OF QUANTUM COMPUTING-

Quantum measurements and Kolmogorovian probability theory

Physics 43 Exam 2 Spring 2018

Semiconductor Physics and Devices

Chapter 32 Lecture Notes

PHYS 172H: Modern Mechanics Fall 2010

Reference Texts. Principles of Quantum Mechanics R Shanker Modern Quantum Mechanics J.J. Sakurai

Special Relativity Lecture

PanHomc'r I'rui;* :".>r '.a'' W"»' I'fltolt. 'j'l :. r... Jnfii<on. Kslaiaaac. <.T i.. %.. 1 >

Transcription:

Locality, Realism, and the Quantum World Michael Raymer, Professor of Physics University of Oregon Q: What is reality? A: I have no idea, but experimental physics can help address this question. 2004 Page 1 of 24

PROPERTIES THE WORLD SHOULD HAVE (A. Einstein) 1. Locality -- all causes and effects are local. No influence can travel faster than the (finite) speed of light. 2. Realism -- physical quantities exist simultaneously, even if they cannot be measured simultaneously. e.g., position and momentum Reality is defined by its elements. Something is an element of reality if, without altering its value (or properties) in any way, one can make a correct, definite prediction about its value. Page 2 of 24

John Bell s example (modified a la L. Hardy): Bertleman s Socks Prof. Bertleman is known to wear one red and one blue sock, or two blue socks, but never two red socks together. Page 3 of 24

Bertleman s Socks If Prof. Bertleman comes around the corner and you see a red sock, then... The colors of both socks are elements of Einstein s Reality. Page 4 of 24

If each sock has two distinct properties Each sock has a color (blue or red) and a size (LARGE or small). In every other way they are identical. In Einstein s world, each of these properties (color and size) should be independently measurable if they are elements of reality. Bertleman s laundry service delivers a thousand pairs of socks each week, bundled as pairs wrapped in paper that hides their properties. Their method for pairing up the socks is not entirely random but is unknown to Bertleman. He pulls a wrapped pair out of his hamper and unwraps it. He finds two socks, each having a particular color and size. Page 5 of 24

The first four sock pairs that he 1 2 3 4 pulls out: pair L R L R L R L R color size blue red LARGE small After many pairs are examined: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS: (left; right) never (blue; LARGE) never (LARGE; blue) never (red; red) Implies that if one is LARGE, the other is red. This would seem to imply that (LARGE; LARGE) is impossible. Page 6 of 24

PROOF BY CONTRADICTION GENERAL OBSERVATIONS: never (blue; LARGE) never (LARGE; blue) never (red; red) (LARGE; LARGE) sometimes occurs. In those cases: ASSUME TRUE: both socks must be red This would seem to imply that (LARGE; LARGE) is impossible. This is inconsistent with never (red; red) Page 7 of 24

Not with socks, but in analogous experiments with electrons or photons Page 8 of 24

Sock-Properties Measuring Apparatus Blue color B/L R/S color Red Large size size Small hamper no need to see socks before they are measured. Page 9 of 24

Sock-Properties Measuring Apparatus Blue Large color size hamper color size Red Small What is wrong with this picture? For socks, nothing, but for electrons,... Page 10 of 24

Blue xxxx Quantum Sock-Properties Measuring Apparatus Color and Size could be Incompatible Properties. We can measure only one of these for each sock. We must choose what to measure. color Left Sock size measurement selector hamper Right Sock color size measurement selector Red xxx xxxx Large color Left Sock size measurement selector hamper Right Sock color size measurement selector Red xxx Page 11 of 24

Produce one million sock pairs. Choose at random the single property to measure for each sock. Left Sock color size measurement selector hamper color size measurement selector measure L ; R L ; R L ; R L ; R Right Sock color/size Blue ; Large Red ; Small Red ; Large Blue ; Small 0 1/6 1/6 2/3 size/color Large ; Blue Small ; Red Small ; Blue Large ; Red 0 1/6 2/3 1/6 size/size Large ; Large Small ; Small Small ; Large Large ; Small 1/12 3/4 1/12 1/12 color/color Blue ; Blue Red, Red Red ; Blue Blue ; Red 1/3 0 1/3 1/3 Page 12 of 24

Results: Observations cannot be explained by a model of Reality in which every sock has a definite color and a definite size before being measured. Conclusion: In the Quantum World it is not true that every sock has a definite color and a definite size before being measured. It is not simply the case that definite properties exist but we just don t know them. Page 13 of 24

xx Photons instead of Socks A photon is an elementary particle of light. Light is an oscillating electric and magnetic force that travels in space. The direction of oscillation is called polarization. Can choose axis of polarization to be Horizontal or Vertical H V Page 14 of 24

Photons Can alternatively choose axis of polarization to be Plus 45 degrees or Minus 45 degrees. Measure on H / V axes H V Measure on P / M axes P M Page 15 of 24

Measuring H/V Photon Polarization: Polarizing beam splitter V H/V V H/V H H Measuring the degree of verticalness Page 16 of 24

Measuring P/M Photon Polarization: Polarization Rotator P V H/V V H/V M H H Measuring the degree of plusness Page 17 of 24

Produce one million photon pairs. Choose at random the polarization axis to measure for each photon. value xxxx xxxx H / V P / M measurement selector ph-1 photon source ph-2 H / V P / M measurement selector xxxx xxxx value Results: Results cannot be explained by a model of Reality in which every photon has a definite H / V polarization and a definite P / M polarization before being measured. Conclusion: It is not true that every photon has a definite H / V polarization and a definite P / M polarization before being measured. Page 18 of 24

What state of two photons can produce such results? Label states using Dirac s notation. Single photons: V L H R V polarized (Photon on Left) H polarized (Photon on Right) State of a pair of photons: Ψ = V L H R the state discussed by Lucien Hardy (Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 1665, 1993) Page 19 of 24

Ψ = 1 [ 3 V H H V H H ] L R + L R L R H = 1 2 P 1 2 M V = 1 2 P + 1 2 M Measure on H / V axes H V Measure on P / M axes P M Page 20 of 24

Ψ = 1 [ 3 V H H V H H ] L R + L R L R H = 1 2 P 1 2 M ; V = 1 2 P + 1 2 M Ψ = 0 H L P R 16 V L M R + 1 6 V L P R + 2 3 H L M R Ψ = 0 P L H R 16 M L V R + 2 3 M L H R + 1 Ψ = 1 12 P L P R 3 4 M L M R + 1 12 M L P R + 1 6 P L V R 12 P L M R Ψ = 1 3 H L H R + 0 V L V R + 1 3 V L H R + 13 H L V R Page 21 of 24

The Bertleman State measure L ; R L ; R L ; R L ; R color/size Blue ; Large Red ; Small Red ; Large Blue ; Small 0 1/6 1/6 2/3 size/color Large ; Blue Small ; Red Small ; Blue Large ; Red 0 1/6 2/3 1/6 size/size Large ; Large Small ; Small Small ; Large Large ; Small 1/12 3/4 1/12 1/12 color/color Blue ; Blue Red, Red Red ; Blue Blue ; Red 1/3 0 1/3 1/3 Page 22 of 24

The Hardy State measure L ; R L ; R L ; R L ; R HV;PM PM;HV PM;PM HV;HV 1 2 0 H L P R 3 H M L R 6 V M 1 L R 6 V P L R 1 2 0 P L H R 3 M H L R 6 M V L R 1 12 P L P R 1 3 H L H R 3 4 M L M R 1 12 M L P R 0 V L V R 13 V L H R 1 6 P L V R 1 12 P L M R 1 3 H L V R Page 23 of 24

There appear to be certain quantities in nature that are not Elements of Reality in the sense that Einstein hoped for. color? size? fabric? N.D. Mermin, American Journal of Physics, 62, 880 (1994) Page 24 of 24