Arizona Pavements and Materials Conference Phoenix, Arizona. November 15-16, John Siekmeier P.E. M.ASCE

Similar documents
Performance Specification for Geogrid Reinforced Aggregate Base

Flexible Pavement Design

TRB Webinar: Estimating Stiffness of Subgrade and Unbound Materials for Pavement Design

2002 Design Guide Preparing for Implementation

Effect of Suction on the Resilient Modulus of Compacted Fine- Grained Subgrade Soils

2008 SEAUPG CONFERENCE-BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA

2012 Road School Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD)

Application of DCP in Prediction of Resilient Modulus of Subgrade Soils

Workshop 4PBB First Steps for the perpetual pavement design: through the analysis of the fatigue life

Mn/DOT Flexible Pavement Design Mechanistic-Empirical Method

GeoShanghai 2010 International Conference Paving Materials and Pavement Analysis

Stress Rotations Due to Moving Wheel Loads and Their Effects on Pavement Materials Characterization

Performance Characteristics of Asphalt Mixtures Incorporating Treated Ground Tire Rubber Added During the Mixing Process

The Superpave System Filling the gaps.

Standardizing Lightweight Deflectometer (LWD) Modulus Measurements for Compaction Quality Assurance LWD study TPF-5(285)

Using the Bitumen Bond Strength Test & Sessile Drop Method

Use of the Light Falling Weight Deflectometer (LFWD) as a site investigation tool for residual soils and weak rock

AMPT Cyclic Fatigue Test

INTERPRETATION OF UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH OF UNSATURATED SOILS IN TERMS OF STRESS STATE VARIABLES

Determination of AASHTO Layer Coefficients for Granular Materials by Use of Resilient Modulus

FULL-DEPTH HMA PAVEMENT DESIGN

LRRB INV 828 Local Road Material Properties and Calibration for MnPAVE

Developing an Economical and Reliable Test for Measuring the Resilient Modulus and Poisson s Ratio of Subgrade

Determination of Resilient Modulus Model for Road-Base Material

NJDOT RESEARCH PROJECT MANAGER: Mr. Anthony Chmiel

Mechanistic Pavement Design

Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide Distress Models

Evaluation of Laboratory Performance Tests for Cracking of Asphalt Pavements

Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design

Superpave Implementation Phase II: Comparison of Performance-Related Test Results

Modulus-Based Construction Specification for Compaction of Earthwork and Unbound Aggregate: Appendices DRAFT FINAL REPORT.

Quantifying Moisture Effects in DCP and LWD Tests Using Unsaturated Mechanics

Asphalt Mix Performance Testing on Field Project on MTO Hwy 10

Dynamic Resilient Modulus and the Fatigue Properties of Superpave HMA Mixes used in the Base Layer of Kansas Flexible Pavements

Phenomenological models for binder rutting and fatigue. University of Wisconsin Research Team

Revised Manuscript No

Pullout Tests of Geogrids Embedded in Non-cohesive Soil

Use of Ultra-High Performance Concrete in Geotechnical and Substructure Applications

Status Update: NCHRP Project 9-48

Linear Amplitude Sweep Test:

Of course the importance of these three problematics is affected by the local environmental conditions.

Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design

SPR-4230: Alternative Quality Assurance Methods for Compacted Subgrade

MECHANICAL BEHAVIOUR OF DAMAGED HDPE GEOMEMBRANES

Mechanistic Investigation of Granular Base and Subbase Materials A Saskatchewan Case Study

Impact of Water on the Structural Performance of Pavements

Liquefaction Potential Variations Influenced by Building Constructions

Lesson 25. Static Pile Load Testing, O-cell, and Statnamic. Reference Manual Chapter 18

Implementation of M-E PDG in Kansas

Modulus of Rubblized Concrete from Surface Wave Testing

COARSE VERSUS FINE-GRADED SUPERPAVE MIXTURES: COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF RESISTANCE TO RUTTING

Development and Validation of Mechanistic-Empirical Design Method for Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavement

Research. Continuous Compaction Control MnROAD Demonstration Final Report

Chapter (12) Instructor : Dr. Jehad Hamad

NCAT Report Results of Inter- laboratory Study for AMPT Pooled Fund Study TPF- 5(178) By Adam Taylor, P.E. Nam Tran, Ph.D., P.E.

The Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Research & Development Executive Summary Report

Field Rutting Performance of Various Base/Subbase Materials under Two Types of Loading

Geotechnical Engineering I CE 341

Seasonal Resilient Modulus Inputs for Tennessee Soils and Their Effects on Asphalt Pavement Performance

Mandal, Tinjum, and Edil 1 NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING OF CEMENTITIOUSLY STABILIZED MATERIALS USING ULTRASONIC PULSE VELOCITY TEST

The CPT in unsaturated soils

EVALUATION OF VACUUM DRYING FOR DETERMINATION OF BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF HMA SAMPLES

Cyclic Triaxial Behavior of an Unsaturated Silty Soil Subjected to Suction Changes

Chapter 1 - Soil Mechanics Review Part A

Unbound Pavement Applications of Excess Foundry System Sands: Subbase/Base Material

TRANSPORTATION POOLED FUND PROGRAM QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT. Lead Agency (FHWA or State DOT): Maryland Department of Transportation

Dynamic Modulus of Asphalt Mixtures for Development of

Estimating Damage Tolerance of Asphalt Binders Using the Linear Amplitude Sweep

The Use of Terrafix TBX Biaxial Geogrids in an MTO Empirical Pavement Design

Evaluating Structural Performance of Base/Subbase Materials at the Louisiana Accelerated Pavement Research Facility

Yield Energy of Asphalt Binders Using the Dynamic Shear Rheometer

DYNAMIC MODULUS MASTER CURVE AND CHARACTERIZATION OF SUPERPAVE HMA CONTAINING VARIOUS POLYMER TYPES

Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide: A User s Perspective. Brian D. Prowell, Ph.D., P.E.

FHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges

Role of Binders in Pavement Performance

Farimah MASROURI. Professor in Geotechnical Engineering. LAEGO : Research Center In Geomechanics & Geoenvironmental Engineering

Advanced Numerical Study of the Effects of Road Foundations on Pavement Performance

Development of a Quick Reliability Method for Mechanistic-Empirical Asphalt Pavement Design

Analysis of Non-Linear Dynamic Behaviours in Asphalt Concrete Pavements Under Temperature Variations

INVESTIGATION OF AGGREGATE SHAPE EFFECTS ON HOT MIX PERFORMANCE USING AN IMAGE ANALYSIS APPROACH

Geotechnical Properties of Soil

Estimating Fatigue Resistance Damage Tolerance of Asphalt Binders Using the Linear Amplitude Sweep

FACTORS AFFECTING RESILIENT MODULUS

MATERIALS FOR CIVIL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERS

Lecture 7 Constitutive Behavior of Asphalt Concrete

A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia

Solid Mechanics Homework Answers

CHARACTERIZATION OF A TWO-LAYER SOIL SYSTEM USING A LIGHTWEIGHT DEFLECTOMETER WITH RADIAL SENSORS Paper #

8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 1, No 4, 2011

UTC ETT160. Incorporation of Hands-on Experiments in an Introductory Structural Analysis Course

Role of the Geotechnical Consultant in Design Build Projects a General Contractors Geotechnical Engineer s Perspective

Predicting Settlement and Stability of Wet Coal Ash Impoundments using Dilatometer Tests

University of Wisconsin-Madison. Railway Substructure Stabilization with Polyurethane Injections

15. Supplementary Notes Conducted in Cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration

Traction Prediction of a Smooth Rigid Wheel in Soil Using Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian Analysis

Canadian Geotechnical Journal SUBGRADE RESILIENT MODULUS PREDICTION FROM LIGHT WEIGHT DEFLECTOMETER

Modified Dry Mixing (MDM) a new possibility in Deep Mixing

Use of Free-Free Resonant Column Testing for Characterizing Infrastructure Materials

LRFD Application in Driven Piles (Recent Development in Pavement & Geotech at LTRC)

Transcription:

Arizona Pavements and Materials Conference Phoenix, Arizona November 15-16, 2017 John Siekmeier P.E. M.ASCE

Minnesota DOT Districts and Local Agencies Other State DOTs, FHWA and NCHRP Contractors and Manufacturers Universities and Consulting Engineers U.S. Congress MAP-21 and FAST

Pavement Foundations are Important Pavement Design Framework Performance Based Specifications Quantifying Moisture and Geogrid Lessons Learned and Next Steps

Surface Condition Remaining Service Life 4

Future performance of each section is estimated. Annual condition of each section is measured. If reference year is 2016. 6 years If RQI is estimated to be 2.5 in 2022. Then the remaining service life = 6 years.

Provides the framework for using performance based material properties Free pavement design software available www.dot.state.mn.us/app/mnpave/index.html Just Google MnPAVE 7

8

Draft specifications produced by NCHRP 10-84 and Transportation Pooled Fund TPF 5(285) Modified version is available at NRRA Pooled Fund website (Geotechnical Team) http://www.dot.state.mn.us/mnroad/nrra/index.html Just Google NRRA

From Traditional Construction Testing Specify Relative Density Specify Gravimetric Moisture Observation and Test Rolling To Performance Based Construction Testing Specify Modulus and/or Strength Specify Volumetric and/or Gravimetric Moisture Observation, Test Rolling, and/or Intelligent Compaction

DCPs and LWDs in Indiana DCPs LWDs Indiana DOT 130+ 60+ Private Sector 30+ 10+ DCP Indiana DOT Test Method No. 509-15P LWD Indiana DOT Test Method No. 508-12T

Strength is not achieved by density alone. Optimum moisture is for compaction. Need to avoid rutting during construction. photo courtesy of Dr. J. David Rogers University of Missouri-Rolla

Methods for hand compaction, such as dropping various weight tampers from different heights and mechanical tampers, were tried and discarded. No use is made of the actual peak dry weight. The measure of soil compaction used is the indicated saturation penetration resistance.

Photo courtesy of Humboldt

ASTM D 6951-03

ASTM E 2583 07 (includes load measurement) ASTM E 2835 11 (no load measurement) AASHTO TP 123-01 draft (determining lab target values) AASHTO TP 456-01 draft (field quality assurance) http://roads.maryland.gov/opr_research/ MD-17-TPF-5-285-LWD_REPORT.pdf

Empowers inspector with useful measures Verifies pavement design inputs Creates as-built record of construction Optimizes future pavement designs

Pavement Design Construction Quality Control Performance Measurement Construction Quality Assurance

LWDs and DCPs are being used to measure properties that significantly affect performance (this includes moisture measurement). Minnesota DOT policy encourages compaction equipment be used to fully map the as-built pavement layers. AASHTO draft specifications are available for performance based construction management.

Ruth Roberson Thesis, 2007

Modulus and strength are greatly affected by the moisture between the particles, which causes a suction or tensile stress between the particles. Tensile stress between particles depends on: Quantity of sand, silt, and clay particles (gradation) Particle shape (roughness) Porosity (total void space openness ) Moisture content (how much water is in the voids)

air void sand grain moisture bridges

moisture included here 25

For typical moistures suction range is 1 60 kpa

Particle Friction 0.9 Suction Stress 5 kpa Confining Stress 100 kpa Modulus (slope) 204 MPa Particle Friction 0.9 Suction Stress 30 kpa Confining Stress 100 kpa Modulus (slope) 242 MPa Increasing suction increases resilient modulus. 29

original factors 1 0.5 0.7 1.2 DEM results from PFC 30

Photo courtesy of Jim Bittmann

Photo courtesy of Jim Bittmann

Photos courtesy of Jim Bittmann

Ideally geogrid would be the only difference between test sections. Reality is that other variables include soil, water, and temperature.

Automated Plate Load Test (Ingios) Trunk Highway 72 September 2016 MnROAD July August 2017

Figure Courtesy of Ingios Geotechnics Link to Research Pays Off Seminar, David White, October 2017 http://www.dot.state.mn.us/mnroad/researchpaysoff/index.html

Aggregate gradation Friction between particles (roughness) Moisture content (suction/tensile stress) Confining stress Geogrid depth within aggregate base layer

Modulus of 8 Inch Aggregate Base Layer Confinement = 150 kpa Particle Friction =.8 Moisture Tension = 1 kpa (gap 3 mm) No Grid M 1 = 61 MPa (8.8 ksi) M 2 = 63 MPa (9.1 ksi) M 3 = 74 MPa (10.7 ksi) M 4 = 79 MPa (11.5 ksi) M 5 = 79 MPa (11.5 ksi) M 6 = 84 MPa (12.2 ksi)

Modulus of 8 Inch Aggregate Base Layer Confinement = 150 kpa Particle Friction =.8 Moisture Tension = 1 kpa (gap 3 mm) With Grid M = 149 MPa (21.6 ksi) M = 166 MPa (24.1 ksi) M = 169 MPa (24.5 ksi)

Modulus of 8 Inch Aggregate Base Layer Confinement = 150 kpa Particle Friction =.8 Moisture Tension = 1 kpa (gap 3 mm) No Grid With Grid Slope = M ng Slope = M grid Geogrid Gain Factors (M 2 /M 1 at axial strain) (0.02%) (0.05%) (0.1%) 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.0

Fatigue Rutting Damage must be less than of 1.0 to achieve 20 year design life. 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.5 Geogrid Gain Factor

Modulus increases as moisture suction increases. Geogrid provides a quantifiable benefit that enhances pavement performance. Implementation continues so that the people s investments are used more effectively. 49

Please ask questions and keep pulling together.