CVaR and Examples of Deviation Risk Measures

Similar documents
Inverse Stochastic Dominance Constraints Duality and Methods

Decomposability and time consistency of risk averse multistage programs

The Subdifferential of Convex Deviation Measures and Risk Functions

Generalized quantiles as risk measures

On Kusuoka Representation of Law Invariant Risk Measures

Robust Optimization for Risk Control in Enterprise-wide Optimization

Generalized quantiles as risk measures

Stochastic Optimization with Risk Measures

Duality in Regret Measures and Risk Measures arxiv: v1 [q-fin.mf] 30 Apr 2017 Qiang Yao, Xinmin Yang and Jie Sun

The Canonical Model Space for Law-invariant Convex Risk Measures is L 1

Competitive Equilibria in a Comonotone Market

On Kusuoka representation of law invariant risk measures

RISK AND RELIABILITY IN OPTIMIZATION UNDER UNCERTAINTY

Topics in Stochastic Programming

Lectures for the Course on Foundations of Mathematical Finance

Aggregate Risk. MFM Practitioner Module: Quantitative Risk Management. John Dodson. February 6, Aggregate Risk. John Dodson.

Minimax and risk averse multistage stochastic programming

Asymptotics of minimax stochastic programs

Cf "Expected shortage and surplus functions", in Stochastic Programming, by Willem K. Klein Haneveld and Maarten H. van der Vlerk, Dept of

Portfolio optimization with stochastic dominance constraints

Coherent risk measures

Generalized Hypothesis Testing and Maximizing the Success Probability in Financial Markets

Risk Measures in non-dominated Models

Course Notes for EE227C (Spring 2018): Convex Optimization and Approximation

Coherent Risk Measures. Acceptance Sets. L = {X G : X(ω) < 0, ω Ω}.

Motivation General concept of CVaR Optimization Comparison. VaR and CVaR. Přemysl Bejda.

Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) Norm: Stochastic Case

Optimization for Communications and Networks. Poompat Saengudomlert. Session 4 Duality and Lagrange Multipliers

COHERENT APPROACHES TO RISK IN OPTIMIZATION UNDER UNCERTAINTY

Stability of optimization problems with stochastic dominance constraints

Dynamic risk measures. Robust representation and examples

Birgit Rudloff Operations Research and Financial Engineering, Princeton University

On a class of minimax stochastic programs

Importance sampling in scenario generation

Variational approach to mean field games with density constraints

4. Conditional risk measures and their robust representation

ORIGINS OF STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING

Dual representations of risk measures

Monetary Risk Measures and Generalized Prices Relevant to Set-Valued Risk Measures

Convex analysis and profit/cost/support functions

Bounded uniformly continuous functions

Online Companion: Risk-Averse Approximate Dynamic Programming with Quantile-Based Risk Measures

Lecture 3: Lagrangian duality and algorithms for the Lagrangian dual problem

A new approach for stochastic ordering of risks

6.1 Variational representation of f-divergences

Convex Optimization Theory. Chapter 5 Exercises and Solutions: Extended Version

c 2004 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

Parcours OJD, Ecole Polytechnique et Université Pierre et Marie Curie 05 Mai 2015

Decision principles derived from risk measures

THE FUNDAMENTAL QUADRANGLE OF RISK

Higher Moment Coherent Risk Measures

Risk averse stochastic programming: time consistency and optimal stopping

LECTURE 10 LECTURE OUTLINE

CVaR (Superquantile) Norm: Stochastic Case

SDS 321: Introduction to Probability and Statistics

Representation theorem for AVaR under a submodular capacity

Continuous Random Variables

Probability and Measure

General approach to the optimal portfolio risk management

THEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 515

Measure-theoretic probability

Phenomena in high dimensions in geometric analysis, random matrices, and computational geometry Roscoff, France, June 25-29, 2012

Computational and Statistical Learning Theory

Electrodynamics PHY712. Lecture 3 Electrostatic potentials and fields. Reference: Chap. 1 in J. D. Jackson s textbook.

RANDOM VARIABLES, MONOTONE RELATIONS AND CONVEX ANALYSIS

Translation invariant and positive homogeneous risk measures and portfolio management. Zinoviy Landsman Department of Statistics, University of Haifa

Question 1. The correct answers are: (a) (2) (b) (1) (c) (2) (d) (3) (e) (2) (f) (1) (g) (2) (h) (1)

MEASURES OF RISK IN STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION

Optimization Problems with Probabilistic Constraints

Aliprantis, Border: Infinite-dimensional Analysis A Hitchhiker s Guide

Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming with CVaR Risk Constraints Applied to Hydrothermal Scheduling. ICSP 2013 Bergamo, July 8-12, 2012

On duality theory of conic linear problems

I. ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY

VaR vs. Expected Shortfall

Optimization Tools in an Uncertain Environment

On a Class of Multidimensional Optimal Transportation Problems

Complexity of Bilevel Coherent Risk Programming

Multivariate comonotonicity, stochastic orders and risk measures

Operations Research Letters. On a time consistency concept in risk averse multistage stochastic programming

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.265/15.070J Fall 2013 Lecture 9 10/2/2013. Conditional expectations, filtration and martingales

ON GAP FUNCTIONS OF VARIATIONAL INEQUALITY IN A BANACH SPACE. Sangho Kum and Gue Myung Lee. 1. Introduction

Probability Review. Yutian Li. January 18, Stanford University. Yutian Li (Stanford University) Probability Review January 18, / 27

Lecture 3: Expected Value. These integrals are taken over all of Ω. If we wish to integrate over a measurable subset A Ω, we will write

A Note on Robust Representations of Law-Invariant Quasiconvex Functions

Economics 204 Summer/Fall 2011 Lecture 5 Friday July 29, 2011

Buered Probability of Exceedance: Mathematical Properties and Optimization

Random sets. Distributions, capacities and their applications. Ilya Molchanov. University of Bern, Switzerland

4th Preparation Sheet - Solutions

Risk Measures. A. Shapiro School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia , USA ICSP 2016

Central-limit approach to risk-aware Markov decision processes

ECE 4400:693 - Information Theory

HW1 solutions. 1. α Ef(x) β, where Ef(x) is the expected value of f(x), i.e., Ef(x) = n. i=1 p if(a i ). (The function f : R R is given.

Chapter 3 sections. SKIP: 3.10 Markov Chains. SKIP: pages Chapter 3 - continued

2) Let X be a compact space. Prove that the space C(X) of continuous real-valued functions is a complete metric space.

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.436J/15.085J Fall 2008 Lecture 11 10/15/2008 ABSTRACT INTEGRATION I

Finanzrisiken. Fachbereich Angewandte Mathematik - Stochastik Introduction to Financial Risk Measurement

CHANGE OF MEASURE. D.Majumdar

ST5215: Advanced Statistical Theory

Time inconsistency of optimal policies of distributionally robust inventory models

SOME REMARKS ON THE SPACE OF DIFFERENCES OF SUBLINEAR FUNCTIONS

Transcription:

CVaR and Examples of Deviation Risk Measures Jakub Černý Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics Stochastic Modelling in Economics and Finance November 10, 2014 1 / 25

Contents CVaR - Dual Representation 1 CVaR - Dual Representation 2 3 2 / 25

Contents CVaR - Dual Representation 1 CVaR - Dual Representation 2 3 3 / 25

General Function Let P be a probability measure on (Ω, F) and consider spaces X := L 1 (Ω, F, P) and Y := L (Ω, F, P). For constants ε 1 > 0 and ε 2 > 0, consider the function ρ(x ) = E P [X ] + φ(x ), where φ(x ) := inf = inf z R Ω z R { ε1 [z X (ω)] + + ε 2 [X (ω) z] + } dp(ω) { ε1 [z x] + + ε 2 [x z] + } dg(x), and G(x) := P({ω : X (ω) x}) is cumulative distribution function (cdf) of X (ω) with respect to the probability measure P. 4 / 25

α-quantile CVaR - Dual Representation The infimum at the right-hand side of previous equation is attained at any z such that P [X z] α and P [X z] 1 α, where α := ε 2 ε 1 + ε 2 = 1 ε 1 ε 1 + ε 2 ; the point z is called a α-quantile of the cdf G(x). Therefore and ε 2 = αε 1 1 α ε 1 [z X ] + + ε 2 [X z] + = = ε 1 { z X + [X z]+ } + ε2 [X z] + = ε 1 { z X + [X z]+ } + αε 1 = ε 1 { z X + 1 1 α [X z] + 1 α [X z] + }. 5 / 25

CVaR Risk Function Consequently, ρ(x ) = E P (X ) + inf z R = (1 ε 1 )E P (X ) + ε 1 inf { ε 1 z x + 1 } 1 α [x z] + dg(x) z R = (1 ε 1 )E P (X ) + ε 1 CVaR α (X ) { z + 1 } dg(x) 1 α [x z] + } {{ } := CVaR α(x ) So in case that ε 1 = 1 we obtain well-known conditional value at risk. ρ(x ) = CVaR α (X ) 6 / 25

Dual Representation The respective conjugate function is the indicator function of the set U := dom(ρ ) and ρ can be represented in the dual form where ρ(x ) = sup h, X h U U := {h Y : 1 ε 1 h(ω) 1 + ε 2, a.e. ω Ω, E P [h] = 1} The set U is a set of probability measures if ε 1 1. This shows that for ε 1 (0, 1] and ε 2 > 0, the function ρ is a risk function. In particular for ε 1 = 1 the dual representation of CVaR holds with the set U := { h Y : 0 h(ω) (1 α) 1, a.e. ω Ω, E P [h] = 1 } 7 / 25

Subdifferential Because ρ is convex, positively homogeneous, and continuous, we have that for any X X, the subdifferential ρ(x ) is nonempty and is given by formula ρ(x ) = arg max h, X. h Y So the risk function ρ is subdifferentiable at every X X and ρ(x ) = arg max hx dp : γ 1 h(ω) γ 2, a.e. ω Ω, E h Y P [h] = 1, where γ 1 = 1 ε 1 and γ 2 = 1 + ε 2. Ω 8 / 25

Argmax Problem Let us consider maximization problem on the right-hand side of previous equation. The Lagrangian of that problem is L(h, λ) = h, X + λ (1 E P [h]) = h, X λ + λ We can write it in the max-min form max inf (X λ)hdp + λ γ 1 h( ) γ 2 λ R. And its dual is the problem min sup (X λ)hdp + λ. λ R γ 1 h( ) γ 2 Ω Ω 9 / 25

Dual Problem Because 0 < γ 1 < γ 2 we have that sup h, X λ = max [γ 1 (X λ), γ 2 (X λ)] dp. γ 1 h( ) γ 2 Ω Therefore the dual problem is equivalent to min max [γ 1 (X λ), γ 2 (X λ)] dp + λ λ R. Ω In case that γ 1 = 0, i.e. CVaR α (X ), we obtain { min (1 α) 1 E P [X λ] + + λ }. λ R 10 / 25

Solution CVaR - Dual Representation Let λ be an optimal solution of the dual problem. Considering leftand right-side derivatives, at λ, of the objective function in the dual problem, we obtain 1 γ 1 P(X < λ) γ 2 P(X λ) 0 1 γ 1 P(X λ) γ 2 P(X > λ) This can be rewritten as follows: ε 1 P(X < λ) ε 2 P(X λ) 0 ε 1 P(X λ) ε 2 P(X > λ). Recalling α = ε 2 / (ε 1 + ε 2 ), we conclude that the set of optimal solutions is the set of α-quantiles of the cdf G, i.e. P(X λ) ε 1 ε 1 + ε 2, P(X λ) ε 2 ε 1 + ε 2. 11 / 25

Solution cont. Recall that the α- quantile of the cdf G is called Value-at-Risk and is denoted by VaR α (X ). For simplicity suppose that the set of α- quantiles of G is a singleton, i.e. α-quantile or VaR α (X ) is defined uniquely. Then arg max set at the beginning is given by such h(ω) that h(ω) = γ 2 if X (ω) > VaR α (X ), ρ(x ) = h : E P [h] = 1, h(ω) = γ 1 if X (ω) < VaR α (X ), h(ω) (γ 1, γ 2 ) if X (ω) = VaR α (X ), and h(ω) for CVaR α (X ) h(ω) = (1 α) 1 if X (ω) > VaR α (X ), h(ω) = 0 if X (ω) < VaR α (X ), h(ω) (0, (1 α) 1 ) if X (ω) = VaR α (X ), 12 / 25

Contents CVaR - Dual Representation 1 CVaR - Dual Representation 2 3 13 / 25

Definition CVaR - Dual Representation One of well-known examples of deviation measures is CVaR-deviation defined as CVaR α (X ) = CVaR α (X E[X ]) for α [0, 1). For α = 1 follows CVaR1 (X ) = E[X ] E[X ] = 0 is not a deviation measure, since it is zero for all random variables (not only for constants). 14 / 25

Risk Envelope Deviation measure D(X ) have dual characterization in terms of risk envelopes Q L 2 (Ω) defined by properties: 1 Q is nonempty, closed and convex, 2 for every nonconstant X there is some Q Q such that E[XQ] < E[X ], 3 E[Q] = 1 for all Q Q. 4 Q 0 for all Q Q. One-to-one correspondence between deviation measures and risk envelopes was shown: D(X ) = E[X ] inf Q Q E[XQ] Q = {Q L 2 (Ω), D(X ) E[X ] E[XQ] for all X } 15 / 25

Risk Envelopes cont. Risk envelope can ve viewed as a set of probability measures providing alternatives for the given probability measure P. In this case, the corresponding deviation measure D(X ) = E[X ] inf Q Q E[XQ] = E P[X ] inf Q Q E Q[X ] estimates the difference of what the agent can expect under P and under the worst probability distribution. 16 / 25

Risk Envelope CVaR-deviation The CVaR-deviation corresponding risk envelope is given by D(X ) = CVaR α (X ) Q = { Q, E[Q] = 1, 0 Q (1 α) 1} For example, if X is discretely distributed with P(X = x k ) = p k, k = 1,..., n then with the risk envelope representation, the CVaR-deviation are simply restated into the linear programming form CVaR α (X ) = = E[X ] min q k { n q k p k x k, 0 q k (1 α) 1, k=1 } n q k p k = 1. k=1 17 / 25

Contents CVaR - Dual Representation 1 CVaR - Dual Representation 2 3 18 / 25

General Function Let P be a probability measure on (Ω, F) and consider the space X := L p (Ω, F, P) for some p [1, ) and Y := L q (Ω, F, P) where 1/p + 1/q = 1. Define ρ(x ) := E P [X ] + cψ p (X ), where c 0 is a constant and ψ p (X ) := X E P [X ] p = Ω 1/p X (ω) E P [X ] p dp(ω). Note that for p = 2, the function ρ( ) corresponds to the classical mean-variance model of Markowitz, but with the standard deviation instead of variance. 19 / 25

Dual Representation The function ρ is convex continuous and positively homogeneous. Also (E P [ X p ]) 1/p = X p = sup h q 1 h, X, and hence (E [ X E P [X ] p ]) 1/p = sup h, X E P [X ] h q 1 = sup h E P [h], X h q 1 It follows that dual representation holds with the set A given by A = { h Y : h = 1 + h E P [h], h q c } 20 / 25

Coherence Conditions, p = 1 Now we know that ρ satisfies convexity, positive homogenity and translation invariance. But the monotonicity condition is more involved. Suppose that p = 1. Then q = +, i.e. the dual norm h is given by the essential maximum of h(ω), ω Ω, and hence for any h A and a.e. ω Ω we have h (ω) = 1 + h(ω) E P [h] 1 h(ω) E P [h] 1 2c for a.e. ω Ω. It follows that if c [0, 1/2], then h A are almost everywhere nonnegative values, and hence A is a set of probability measures. Therefore all coherent conditions are satisfied. 21 / 25

Coherence Conditions, p = 1, cont. Conversely, take h := c ( ) 1 A + 1 Ω/A. for some A F, and h = 1 + h E P [h]. Then h = c, Ω h dp = c[1 2P(A)], and hence 1 + h(ω) h dp = 1 2c + 2cP(A). Ω It follows that if c > 1/2, then h (ω) < 0 for all ω A, provided that P(A) is small enough. We obtain that for c > 1/2 the monotnonicity property does not hold if the following condition is satisfied: For any ε > 0 there exists A F such that ε > P(A) > 0. ( ) 22 / 25

Coherence Conditions, p > 1 Suppose now that p > 1. For a set A F and α > 0 let us take h := α1 A and h = 1 + h E P [h]. Then h q = αp(a) 1/q and h (ω) = 1 α + αp(a) ω Ω If p > 1, then for any c > 0 the mean deviation measure does not satisfy monotonicity condition if ( ) holds. Because and αp(a) 1/q c 1 α + αp(a) 1 cp(a) 1/q + cp(a)p(a) 1/q = 1 c 1 P(A) P(A) 1/q. 23 / 25

CVaR - Dual Representation P.Krokhmal, M.Zabarankin, S.Uryasev: Modeling and Optimization of Risk, Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science 16, 49-66, 2011. A. Ruszczynski, A. Shapiro: Optimization of Convex Risk Functions Mathematics of Operations Research 31(3),pp. 433-452, 2006. A. Shapiro, D. Dentcheva, A. Ruszczynski: Lectures on Stochastic Programming Modeling and Theory Mathematical modeling society, 2009. 24 / 25

Thank you for your attention. 25 / 25