Convolutions Involving the Exponential Function and the Exponential Integral

Similar documents
ON THE SINE INTEGRAL AND THE CONVOLUTION

A Result on the Neutrix Composition of the Delta Function

RESULTS ON THE BETA FUNCTION. B(x, y) = for x, y > 0, see for example Sneddon [4]. It then follows that

FURTHER RESULTS ON CONVOLUTIONS INVOLVING GAUSSIAN ERROR FUNCTION erf( x 1/2 )

Defining Incomplete Gamma Type Function with Negative Arguments and Polygamma functions ψ (n) ( m)

Some Fixed Point Theorems for Certain Contractive Mappings in G-Metric Spaces

Results on the Commutative Neutrix Convolution Product Involving the Logarithmic Integral li(

On imbalances in oriented multipartite graphs

COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS FOR FOUR MAPPINGS WITH SOME WEAK CONDITIONS OF COMMUTATIVITY

ON STRUCTURE AND COMMUTATIVITY OF NEAR - RINGS

Math Calculus f. Business and Management - Worksheet 12. Solutions for Worksheet 12 - Limits as x approaches infinity

ANALYSIS AND APPLICATION OF DIFFUSION EQUATIONS INVOLVING A NEW FRACTIONAL DERIVATIVE WITHOUT SINGULAR KERNEL

Yunhi Cho. 3 y = y yy,.

A Structure of KK-Algebras and its Properties

A fixed point theorem for (µ, ψ)-generalized f-weakly contractive mappings in partially ordered 2-metric spaces

SOME RESULTS ON SPECIAL CONTINUED FRACTION EXPANSIONS IN REAL QUADRATIC NUMBER FIELDS

ZEROS OF THE JOST FUNCTION FOR A CLASS OF EXPONENTIALLY DECAYING POTENTIALS. 1. Introduction

A NOTE ON MULTIPLIERS OF L p (G, A)

On Generalized Derivations and Commutativity. of Prime Rings with Involution

Trace Inequalities for a Block Hadamard Product

SEVERAL PRODUCTS OF DISTRIBUTIONS ON MANIFOLDS

(Lj DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION WITH OPERATOR COEFFICIENTS ON THE INTITIAL VALUE PROBLEM FOR A PARTIAL

Some Inequalities for Commutators of Bounded Linear Operators in Hilbert Spaces

A Note about the Pochhammer Symbol

ON THE ENDOMORPHISM RING OF A CHAIN MODULE

Extension of Summation Formulas involving Stirling series

A RELATED FIXED POINT THEOREM FOR THREE METRIC SPACES

Existence and Uniqueness Results for Nonlinear Implicit Fractional Differential Equations with Boundary Conditions

A CHARACTERIZATION OF WARPED PRODUCT PSEUDO-SLANT SUBMANIFOLDS IN NEARLY COSYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS

SOME GENERALIZED SEQUENCE SPACES OF INVARIANT MEANS DEFINED BY IDEAL AND MODULUS FUNCTIONS IN N-NORMED SPACES

FIBONACCI NUMBERS AND SEMISIMPLE CONTINUED FRACTION. and Ln

TIMELIKE BIHARMONIC CURVES ACCORDING TO FLAT METRIC IN LORENTZIAN HEISENBERG GROUP HEIS 3. Talat Korpinar, Essin Turhan, Iqbal H.

MATH 1010E University Mathematics Lecture Notes (week 8) Martin Li

THE STRUCTURE OF A RING OF FORMAL SERIES AMS Subject Classification : 13J05, 13J10.

Fixed points and functional equation problems via cyclic admissible generalized contractive type mappings

Two-Step Iteration Scheme for Nonexpansive Mappings in Banach Space

This condition was introduced by Chandra [1]. Ordonez Cabrera [5] extended the notion of Cesàro uniform integrability

Characterizations on Heavy-tailed Distributions by Means of Hazard Rate

A Common Fixed Point Theorem for Multivalued Mappings Through T-weak Commutativity

Section 11.1 Sequences

Some common fixed points of multivalued mappings on complex-valued metric spaces with homotopy result

ON THE HILBERT INEQUALITY. 1. Introduction. π 2 a m + n. is called the Hilbert inequality for double series, where n=1.

ON SOME INEQUALITIES FOR THE INCOMPLETE GAMMA FUNCTION

Attractivity of the Recursive Sequence x n+1 = (α βx n 1 )F (x n )

ON QUALITATIVE PROPERTIES OF SOLUTIONS OF QUASILINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS WITH STRONG DEPENDENCE ON THE GRADIENT

EQUIVALENCE OF TOPOLOGIES AND BOREL FIELDS FOR COUNTABLY-HILBERT SPACES

On Derivations of BCC-algebras

INITIAL-VALUE PROBLEMS FOR FIRST-ORDER DIFFERENTIAL RECURRENCE EQUATIONS WITH AUTO-CONVOLUTION

An Application of Wilf's Subordinating Factor Sequence on Certain Subclasses of Analytic Functions

ON 3-PRIME NEAR-RINGS WITH GENERALIZED DERIVATIONS

Some Remarks on Contraction Mappings in Rectangular b-metric Spaces

ON TAUBERIAN CONDITIONS FOR (C, 1) SUMMABILITY OF INTEGRALS

Research Article Common Fixed Points of Weakly Contractive and Strongly Expansive Mappings in Topological Spaces

RIGHT SELF-INJECTIVE RINGS IN WHICH EVERY ELEMENT IS A SUM OF TWO UNITS

NOTES ON PLANAR SEMIMODULAR LATTICES. IV. THE SIZE OF A MINIMAL CONGRUENCE LATTICE REPRESENTATION WITH RECTANGULAR LATTICES

SUBELLIPTIC CORDES ESTIMATES

In last semester, we have seen some examples about it (See Tutorial Note #13). Try to have a look on that. Here we try to show more technique.

A note on a construction of J. F. Feinstein

THE ZERO-DISTRIBUTION AND THE ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF A FOURIER INTEGRAL. Haseo Ki and Young One Kim

Chih-Hung Yen and Hung-Lin Fu 1. INTRODUCTION

arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 25 Jan 2011

POISSON BRACKETS OF HYDRODYNAMIC TYPE, FROBENIUS ALGEBRAS AND LIE ALGEBRAS

Polynomial Equation in Radicals

arxiv: v1 [math-ph] 5 May 2015

Yunhi Cho and Young-One Kim

NOTES ON PLANAR SEMIMODULAR LATTICES. IV. THE SIZE OF A MINIMAL CONGRUENCE LATTICE REPRESENTATION WITH RECTANGULAR LATTICES

On the Integral of Almost Periodic Functions. of Several Variables

High-order Newton-type iterative methods with memory for solving nonlinear equations

Sang-baek Lee*, Jae-hyeong Bae**, and Won-gil Park***

ON MATRIX VALUED SQUARE INTEGRABLE POSITIVE DEFINITE FUNCTIONS

Math RE - Calculus I Exponential & Logarithmic Functions Page 1 of 9. y = f(x) = 2 x. y = f(x)

INTRODUCTION TO REAL ANALYSIS II MATH 4332 BLECHER NOTES

Kaczmarz algorithm in Hilbert space

Some Hecke Algebra Products and Corresponding Random Walks

Houston Journal of Mathematics. c 2008 University of Houston Volume 34, No. 4, 2008

Generalized Near-Bell Numbers

Periodic solutions of a class of nonautonomous second order differential systems with. Daniel Paşca

Taylor Series and Asymptotic Expansions

Derivations of B-algebras

C-Normal Topological Property

On (θ, θ)-derivations in Semiprime Rings

SOLVABILITY OF A QUADRATIC INTEGRAL EQUATION OF FREDHOLM TYPE IN HÖLDER SPACES

CHEBYSHEV S BIAS AND GENERALIZED RIEMANN HYPOTHESIS

On Common Fixed Point and Approximation Results of Gregus Type

Some fixed point results for dual contractions of rational type

The Maximum Dimension of a Subspace of Nilpotent Matrices of Index 2

Solutions Quiz 9 Nov. 8, Prove: If a, b, m are integers such that 2a + 3b 12m + 1, then a 3m + 1 or b 2m + 1.

STABILITY OF A GENERALIZED MIXED TYPE ADDITIVE, QUADRATIC, CUBIC AND QUARTIC FUNCTIONAL EQUATION

Solve Wave Equation from Scratch [2013 HSSP]

C-COLOR COMPOSITIONS AND PALINDROMES

MAPPING CHAINABLE CONTINUA ONTO DENDROIDS

Dragan S. Djordjević. 1. Introduction

arxiv: v2 [math.dg] 27 Jan 2017

ON 2-ABSORBING PRIMARY AND WEAKLY 2-ABSORBING ELEMENTS IN MULTIPLICATIVE LATTICES

LOCAL INVARIANCE OF FREE TOPOLOGICAL GROUPS

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, P. O. Box: 80111, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.

Monotone Iterative Method for a Class of Nonlinear Fractional Differential Equations on Unbounded Domains in Banach Spaces

A.M. HAMMAS Department of Mathematics College of Education. P.O.Box 344 King Abdulaziz University Madinah, Saudi Arabia. can be presented as

Weighted differentiation composition operators from the logarithmic Bloch space to the weighted-type space

New Generalizations of Caristi s Fixed Point Theorem Via Brézis Browder Principle

Transcription:

Mathematica Moravica Vol. 19-2 (215), 65 73 Convolutions Involving the Eponential Function and the Eponential Integral Brian Fisher and Fatma Al-Sirehy Abstract. The eponential integral ei(λ) and its associated functions ei (λ) and ei (λ) are defined as locally summable functions on the real line and their derivatives are found as distributions. The convolutions r ei () s e and r ei () s e are evaluated. 1. Introduction and Results The eponential integral ei() is defined for > by (1) ei() u 1 e u d u, see Sneddon [8, the integral diverging for. It was pointed out in [1 that equation (1) can be rewritten in the form (2) ei() u 1 [e u H(1 u) d u H(1 ) ln, where H denotes Heaviside s function. The integral in this equation is convergent for all and so we use equation (2) to define ei() on the real line. More generally, see [1, if λ, we define ei(λ) in the obvious way by (3) ei(λ) λ u 1 [e u H(1 u) d u H(1 λ) ln λ. Further, we define the functions ei (λ) and ei (λ) by so that ei (λ) H() ei(λ), ei (λ) H() ei(λ) (4) ei(λ) ei (λ) ei (λ). (5) In particular, if λ >, we have ei(λ) u 1 [e λu H(1 λu) d u H(1 λ) ln λ, 21 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary: 33B1, 46F1. Key words and phrases. eponential integral, convolution. 65 c 215 Mathematica Moravica

66 Convolutions Involving the Eponential Function... (6) (7) where and ei (λ) ei (λ) γ(λ) u 1 e λu d u, >, γ u 1 (e λu 1) d u ln, <, γ(λ) γ ln λ u 1 [e λu H(1 λu) d u is Euler s constant. The derivatives of these functions are given by (8) for all λ. In particular, we have (9) where ei() ei () [ei(λ) e λ 1, [ei (λ) e λ 1 γ(λ)δ(), [ei (λ) e λ 1 ei () γ γ γ(λ)δ()), u 1 [e u H(1 u) d u H(1 ) ln, u 1 e u d u, >, u 1 (e u 1) d u ln, <, u 1 [e u H(1 u) d u is Euler s constant. The derivatives of these functions are given by (1) [ei() e 1, [ei () e 1 γδ(), [ei () e 1. The classical definition of the convolution of two functions f and g is as follows: Definition 1. Let f and g be functions. defined by (f g)() for all points for which the integral eist. Then the convolution f g is f(t)g( t) d t

Brian Fisher and Fatma Al-Sirehy 67 It follows easily from the definition that if f g eists then g f eists and (11) f g g f and if (f g) and f g (or f g) eists, then (12) (f g) f g ( or f g). Definition 1 can be etended to define the convolution f g of two distributions f and g in D with the following definition, see Gel fand and Shilov [7. Definition 2. Let f and g be distributions in D. Then the convolution f g is defined by the equation (f g)(), ϕ f(y), g(), ϕ( y) for arbitrary ϕ in D, provided f and g satisfy either of the conditions (a) either f or g has bounded support, (b) the supports of f and g are bounded on the same side. It follows that if the convolution f g eists by this definition then equations (1) and (11) are satisfied. The locally summable functions e and e are defined by e H()e e H()e. In the following we need the following lemma, which is easily proved by induction. Lemma 1. for, 1, 2,.... t e t d t t e 2t d t i i! ui e u!,! 2 i1 ui e 2u! 2 1, We now prove the following theorem.

68 Convolutions Involving the Eponential Function... Theorem 1. The convolution r ei () s e eists and (13) r ei () s e r )(1) (r )! s[ i1 (i 1)! 2 ij j! j e (i 1)! 2 i e j ( ) s (1) (r )! s [e ei (2) e ei () ln 2 e )(1) (r )! s[ r i (1 e ) ei (), for r, s, 1, 2,... and r, s not both zero. In particular, (14) for r 1, 2,... and r ei () e r! r [ i1 j (i 1)! 2 ij j! j e (i 1)! 2 i e r![e ei (2) e ei () ln 2 e [ r i r! (1 e ) ei (), (15) ei () e ei () e ei (2) ln 2 e. Proof. The convolution r ei () s e if < and so when >, we have r ei () s e t r ( t) s e t u 1 e u d u d t (16) where (17) t u 1 e u t r ( t) s e t d t d u I 1 I 2, t r ( t) s e t d t u 1 e u t r ( t) s e t d t d u ( s u )(1) s t r e t d t )(1) (r )! s[ r u i eu (e u 1)

Brian Fisher and Fatma Al-Sirehy 69 and in particular when r s, (18) e t d t e u 1, on using the lemma. Hence ( ) s I 1 (1) (r )! s e (19) (2) [r u i1 e 2u u 1 (e 2u e u ) d u r ( s (r )! )(1) s e u i1 e 2u d u ( s )(1) (r )! s e u 1 (e 2u e u ) d u. Further, we have u i1 on using the lemma, and (21) (22) Similarly i1 e 2u d u j u 1 [e u H(1 u) d u (i 1)! 2 ij j! j e 2 u 1 [e u H(1 u) d u u 1 e u d u γ ei () (i 1)! 2 i, u 1 H(1 u) d u u 1 H(1 u) d u. u 1 [e 2u H(1 2u) d u γ ei (2) It follows from equations (21) and (22) that (23) u 1 (e u e 2u ) d u ei (2) ei () ei (2) ei () ln 2. u 1 H[1 2u d u. u 1 [H(1 u) H(1 2u) d u

7 Convolutions Involving the Eponential Function... In particular, when r s, we have (24) I 1 [ei (2) ei () ln 2e. Net, as in equation (17), we have t r ( t) s e t d t (25) )(1) (r )! s[ r i e (e 1) and so (26) I 2 )(1) (r )! s[ r i (1 e ) ei (). In particular, when r s, we have (27) I 2 (e 1) u 1 e u d u (e 1) ei (). Equation (13) now follows from equations (2), (21), (22), (25) and (26). Equation (14) follows on putting s in equation (13) and equation (15) follows on putting r in equation (14). In the corollary, the distribution 2 as in Gel fand and Shilov. is defined by 2 (1 ) and not Corollary 1.1. The convolutions (e 1 ) e and (e 2 ) e eist and (28) (29) (e 1 ) e e ei (2) γ(2)e (e 2 ) e 2e ei (2) 2γ(2)e e 1. Proof. The convolution (e 1 ) e eists by Definition 2, since e 1 and e are both bounded on the left. From equation (12), we have [ei () e [e 1 γδ() e (e 1 ) e γe ei () [e δ() e ei (2) ln 2 e and equation (28) follows. From equations (12) and (28), we now have [(e 1 ) e (e 1 e 2 ) e e ei (2) γ(2)e (e 2 ) e (e 1 ) [e δ() e ei (2) γ(2)e e 1

Brian Fisher and Fatma Al-Sirehy 71 and equation (29) follows. Theorem 2. The convolution r ei () s e eists and r ( ) s (1) r ei () s e (r )! 2 i s e (3) ( ) s (1) ln 2(r )! s e, for r, s, 1, 2,... and r, s not both zero. In particular r (31) r ei () e r! 2 i e ln 2r!e, for r 1, 2,... and (32) ei () e ln 2 e (33) ei () e ln 2 e ln 2 e 1 2 e. Proof. We have r ei () s e t r ( t) s e t u 1 e u d u d t t u 1 e u t r ( t) s e t d t d u r )(1) (r )! s e u i1 e 2u d u ( s )(1) (r )! s e (u 1 e 2u u 1 e u ) d u r ( ) s (1) (r )! 2 i s e i ( ) s (1) ln 2(r )! s e on maing use of equation (17), the lemma and noting that u 1 (e 2u e u ) d u ln u(2e 2u e u ) d u Γ (1) ln 2 Γ (1) ln 2, proving equation (3). Equation (31) follows on putting s in equation (3) and equation (32) follows on putting r in equation (31).

72 Convolutions Involving the Eponential Function... Equation (31) follows on putting r and s 1 in equation (3). Corollary 2.1. The convolution (e n ) e eists and (34) e n e (1)n 2 n1 γ(2)e (n 1)! for n 1, 2,.... In particular, (35) e 1 e γ(2)e 1 2 e. Proof. Differentiating equation (32), we get [e 1 γδ() e (e 1 ) e γe ln 2e and we see that equation (34) is true when n 1. Now assume that equation (34) is true for some n. Then differentiating equation (34), we get It follows that (e n ne n1 ) e (e n ) e. ne n1 e 2(e n ) e (1)n1 2 n γ(2)e (n 1)! and so equation (33) is true for n1. Equation (34) now follows by induction. Differentiating equation (33), we get and equation (35) follows. [e 1 γδ() e ln 2 e 1 2 e For further results involving the eponential integral, see [2, 3, 4, 5 and [6. References [1 B. Fisher and J.D. Nicholas, The eponential integral and the convolution, SUT J. Math., 33(2)(1997), 139-148. [2 B. Fisher and J.D. Nicholas, The neutri convolution product of ei(λ) and r, Math. Montisnigri, 9(1998), 51-64. [3 B. Fisher and J.D Nicholas, On the eponential integral, Hacet. Bull. Nat. Sci. Eng. Ser. B, 28(1999), 55-64. [4 B. Fisher and J.D Nicholas, The eponential integral and the neutri convolution product, J. Nat. Sci. Math., 4(1,2)(2), 23-36. [5 B. Fisher and J.D. Nicholas, On the eponential integral and the non-commutative convolution product, Integral Transforms Spec. Funct., 11(4)(21), 353-362.

Brian Fisher and Fatma Al-Sirehy 73 [6 B. Fisher, E. Özçaḡ and Ü. Gülen, The eponential integral and the commutative neutri convolution product, J. Analysis, 7(1999), 7-2. [7 I.M. Gel fand and G.E. Shilov, Generalized functions, Vol. I, Academic Press (1964). [8 I.N. Sneddon, Special Functions of Mathematical Physics and Chemistry, Oliver and Boyd, (1961). Brian Fisher Department of Mathematics University of Leicester Leicester, LE1 7RH England E-mail address: fbr@le.ac.u Fatma Al-Sirehy Department of Mathematics King Abdulaziz University Jeddah Saudi Arabia E-mail address: falserehi@au.edu.sa