Thermonuclear Reactions

Similar documents
Stellar Interiors - Hydrostatic Equilibrium and Ignition on the Main Sequence.

Chemical Evolution of the Universe

Fundamental Stellar Parameters. Radiative Transfer. Stellar Atmospheres. Equations of Stellar Structure

Stellar Structure. Observationally, we can determine: Can we explain all these observations?

From Last Time: We can more generally write the number densities of H, He and metals.

Ay 1 Lecture 8. Stellar Structure and the Sun

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON

What Powers the Stars?

Week 4: Nuclear physics relevant to stars

Stellar Interior: Physical Processes

Introductory Astrophysics A113. Death of Stars. Relation between the mass of a star and its death White dwarfs and supernovae Enrichment of the ISM

Solar Interior. Sources of energy for Sun Nuclear fusion Solar neutrino problem Helioseismology

Selected Topics in Nuclear Astrophysics

THIRD-YEAR ASTROPHYSICS

Star Formation and Protostars

Accretion Mechanisms

The Sun: Our Nearest Star

11/19/08. Gravitational equilibrium: The outward push of pressure balances the inward pull of gravity. Weight of upper layers compresses lower layers

Pre Main-Sequence Evolution

9.1 Introduction. 9.2 Static Models STELLAR MODELS

Section 12. Nuclear reactions in stars Introduction

Solar Neutrinos. Solar Neutrinos. Standard Solar Model

1 Stellar Energy Generation Physics background

The Virial Theorem for Stars

Astronomy 404 October 9, 2013

Astro Instructors: Jim Cordes & Shami Chatterjee.

:Lecture 27: Stellar Nucleosynthesis. Cassieopia A

Lecture 1. Overview Time Scales, Temperature-density Scalings, Critical Masses

Lecture 1. Overview Time Scales, Temperature-density Scalings, Critical Masses. I. Preliminaries

Stars and their properties: (Chapters 11 and 12)

MAJOR NUCLEAR BURNING STAGES

The CNO Bi-Cycle. Note that the net sum of these reactions is

7. The Evolution of Stars a schematic picture (Heavily inspired on Chapter 7 of Prialnik)

Core evolution for high mass stars after helium-core burning.

Nuclear Astrophysics

Astronomy 112: The Physics of Stars. Class 13 Notes: Schematics of the Evolution of Stellar Cores

Stellar Structure and Evolution

13 Synthesis of heavier elements. introduc)on to Astrophysics, C. Bertulani, Texas A&M-Commerce 1

Physics 556 Stellar Astrophysics Prof. James Buckley. Lecture 9 Energy Production and Scaling Laws

August We can therefore write for the energy release of some reaction in terms of mass excesses: Q aa = [ m(a)+ m(a) m(y) m(y)]. (1.

Life of a High-Mass Stars

Nuclear Binding Energy

ORIGIN OF THE ELEMENETS

Outline I. Overview. Equations of Stellar structure and Evolution. Pre Main sequence evolution. Main sequence evolution. Post-Main sequence evolution

Astronomy II (ASTR1020) Exam 3 Test No. 3D

Stellar structure and evolution. Pierre Hily-Blant April 25, IPAG

PHY-105: Nuclear Reactions in Stars (continued)

LECTURE 15 Jerome Fang -

Fundamental Stellar Parameters. Radiative Transfer. Stellar Atmospheres

P M 2 R 4. (3) To determine the luminosity, we now turn to the radiative diffusion equation,

Nuclear Astrophysics

Basic concepts in stellar physics

Primordial (Big Bang) Nucleosynthesis

Nuclear Astrophysics - I

Nuclear Binding Energy

HR Diagram, Star Clusters, and Stellar Evolution

Stellar Models ASTR 2110 Sarazin

Computational Applications in Nuclear Astrophysics using JAVA

The Later Evolution of Low Mass Stars (< 8 solar masses)

Stellar structure and evolution

(2) low-mass stars: ideal-gas law, Kramer s opacity law, i.e. T THE STRUCTURE OF MAIN-SEQUENCE STARS (ZG: 16.2; CO 10.6, 13.

LECTURE 15: WHITE DWARFS AND THE ADVANCED EVOLUTION OF MASSIVE STARS.

Nuclear Reactions and Solar Neutrinos ASTR 2110 Sarazin. Davis Solar Neutrino Experiment

Lecture 20: Deuterium Burning and Hydrogen Burning

The Stars. Chapter 14

Lecture notes 8: Nuclear reactions in solar/stellar interiors

5. Energy Production and Transport

Summary of stellar equations

The Later Evolution of Low Mass Stars (< 8 solar masses)

Neutron-to-proton ratio

Phases of Stellar Evolution

Chapter CHAPTER 11 ORIGIN OF THE ELEMENTS

Nucleosynthesis. W. F. McDonough 1. Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai , Japan. (Dated: Tuesday 24 th April, 2018)

Stellar Interiors ASTR 2110 Sarazin. Interior of Sun

Gravitational collapse of gas

Chapter 19: The Evolution of Stars

Chapter IX: Nuclear fusion

Chapter 7 Particle physics in the stars

Heavy Element Nucleosynthesis. A summary of the nucleosynthesis of light elements is as follows

80 2 Observational Cosmology L and the mean energy

The Microphysics. EOS, opacity, energy generation

Filling the intellectual Vacuum: Energy Production. Contenders: From early 1920s: probably fusion, but how?

Chapter 14. Stellar Evolution I. The exact sequence of evolutionary stages also depends on the mass of a star.

Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics of Exploding Stars

Topics in Nuclear Astrophysics II. Stellar Reaction Rates

High Mass Stars. Dr Ken Rice. Discovering Astronomy G

Stars: Their Life and Afterlife

Announcements. - Homework #5 due today - Review on Monday 3:30 4:15pm in RH103 - Test #2 next Tuesday, Oct 11

10/17/2012. Stellar Evolution. Lecture 14. NGC 7635: The Bubble Nebula (APOD) Prelim Results. Mean = 75.7 Stdev = 14.7

Homologous Stellar Models and Polytropes

AST1100 Lecture Notes

Interactions. Laws. Evolution

Lecture #1: Nuclear and Thermonuclear Reactions. Prof. Christian Iliadis

t KH = GM2 RL Pressure Supported Core for a Massive Star Consider a dense core supported by pressure. This core must satisfy the equation:

Outline - March 18, H-R Diagram Review. Protostar to Main Sequence Star. Midterm Exam #2 Tuesday, March 23

Topics ASTR 3730: Fall 2003

James Maxwell ( )

Stellar Evolution ASTR 2110 Sarazin. HR Diagram vs. Mass

Evolution of High Mass Stars

AST101 Lecture 13. The Lives of the Stars

Transcription:

Thermonuclear Reactions

Eddington in 1920s hypothesized that fusion reactions between light elements were the energy source of the stars. Stellar evolution = (con) sequence of nuclear reactions E kinetic kt c 8.62 10 8 T~ kev, but E Coulomb barrier = Z 1Z 2 e 2 r = 1.44 Z 1Z 2 r[fm] higher than the kinetic energy of the particles. ~ MeV, 3 orders Tunneling effect in QM proposed by Gamow (1928, Z. Physik, 52, 510); applied to energy source in stars by Atkinson & Houtermans (1929, Z. Physik, 54, 656) 2

George Gamow (1904-1968) Russian-born physicist, stellar and big bang nucleosynthesis, CMB, DNA, Mr. Thompkins series 1929 U Copenhagen 1960s U Colorado 3

4

Quantum mechanics tunneling effect 5

e πz 1Z 2 e 2 /ε 0 hν This as v e mv2 /2kT This as v 6

Clayton 7

Clayton 8

Resonance very sharp peak in the reaction rate ignition of a nuclear reaction So there exists a narrow range of temperature in which the reaction rate a power law an ignition (threshold) temperature For a thermonuclear reaction or a nucleosynthesis (fusion) process, the reaction rate is expressed as q energy released per mass ρ m T n Resonance reactions Energy of interacting particles Energy level of compound nucleus 9

σ v t n v N = n (σvt) N t = n σv t col = 1/ n σv l = vt col = 1/n σ 10

r 12 n 1 n 2 σv n 1 n 2 exp C z 1 2 z 2 2 n i X i q 12 Q ρ X 1 X 2 /m 1 m 2 [erg g 1 s 1 ] T 6 1/3 [cm 3 s 1 ] n i m i = ρx i 11

Nuclear Fission (e.g., power planets) Fusion (e.g., stars) 12

13

Star Brown dwarf Planet Burrows 14

Stars Brown Dwarfs Planets M M > 0.08, core H fusion Spectral types O, B, A, F, G, K, M 0.065 > M M > 0.013, core D fusion 0.080 > M M > 0.065, core Li fusion Spectral types M6.5 9, L, T, Y Electron degenerate core 10 g cm 3 < ρ c < 10 3 g cm 3 T c < 3 10 6 K M M < 0.013, no fusion ever 15 39

16

17

Brown dwarfs and very lowmass stars partial P e deg White dwarfs completely degenerate, R as M Terrestrial planets R as M complicated EoSs Mass-radius relation max @ M Jupiter ( 1 1000) M 18

M c 2 = 2 10 54 ergs 1 amu = 931 Mev/c 2 19

n + p D + γ (production of D) D + D 4 He + γ (destruction) faster The lower the mass density, the more the D abundant D as a sensitive tracer of the density of the early Universe 4 He 4 He n/2 (n+p)/4 = 2n n+p n/p 0.12 4 He 2/9 20

D H 156 ppm Terrestrial seawater 1.56 10 4 22~26 ppm Jupiter 17 ppm Saturn 55 ppm Uranus 200 ppm Halley s Comet 21

22

Clayton 23

Protostars are heavily embedded in clouds, so obscured, with no definition of T eff Birthline=beginning of PMS; star becomes optically visible deuterium main sequence Stahler (1983, 1988), Palla & Stahler (1990) 24

compared with observations 25

26

Presence of Li I λ6707 absorption stellar youth Ca I λ6718 prominent in late-type stars Stahler & Palla 27

For protostars with T c 3 10 6 K, the central lithium is readily destroyed. Stars 0.9 M become radiative at the core, so Li not fully depleted. Li abundance age clock 7,000 K 4,000 K Stahler & Palla 28

Stahler & Palla29

0.420 MeV to the positron and neutrino; position and electron (each 0.511 MeV rest energy) annihilate 1.442 MeV 30

p + p 2 He p + p 31

32

pp I important when T c > 5 10 6 K Q total = 1.44 2 + 5.49 2 +12.85 = 27.7 MeV Q net = 27.7 0.26 2 = 26.2 MeV The baryon number, lepton number, and charges are all conserved. All 3 branches operate simultaneously. pp I is responsible for > 90% stellar luminosity 33

Exercise Assuming that the solar luminosity if provided by 4 1 H 4 He, liberating 26.73 MeV, and that the neutrinos carry off about 2% of the total energy. Estimate how many neutrinos are produced each second from the sun? What is the solar neutrino flux at the earth? 34

Solution 3% is carried away by neutrinos, so the actual energy produced for radiation E = (0.98 26.731 MeV) 1.6 10 12 erg/ev Each alpha particle produced 2 neutrinos, so with L = 3.846 10 33 ergs/s, the neutrino production rate is 2 10 38 ν/s, and the flux at earth is 2 10 38 /4π (1 AU) 2 6.6 10 10 ν cm 2 s 1 35

The thermonuclear reaction rate, r pp = 3.09 10 37 n 2 2 p T 3 1 3 6 exp 33.81 T 6 1 (1 + 0.0123 T 3 2 6 + 0.0109 T 3 6 + 0.0009 T 6 ) [cm 3 s 1 ], where the factor 3.09 10 37 n 2 p = 11.05 10 10 ρ 2 2 X H q pp = 2.38 10 6 ρ X H 2 T 6 2 3 exp 33.81 T 6 1 3 (1 + 0.0123 T 6 1 3 + 0.0109 T 6 2 3 + 0.0009 T 6 ) [erg g 1 s 1 ] 36

6.54 MeV per proton n ~ 6 for T 5 10 6 K n ~ 3.8 for T 15 10 6 K (Sun) n ~ 3.5 for T 20 10 6 K 37

Among all fusion processes, the p-p chain has the lower temperature threshold, and the weakest temperature dependence. Q pp = (M 4H M He ) c 2 = 26.73 MeV But some energy (up to a few MeV) is carried away by neutrinos. 38

CN cycle more significant NO cycle efficient only when T > 20 10 6 K Recognized by Bethe and independently by von Weizsäcker CN cycle + NO cycle Cycle can start from any reaction as long as the involved isotope is present. after that carried away by the neutrinos 39

Schwarzschild At the center of the Sun, q CNO /q pp 0.1 CNO dominates in stars > 1.2 M, i.e., of a spectral type F7 or earlier large energy outflux a convective core This separates the lower and upper MS. CN cycle takes over from the PP chains near T 6 =18. He burning starts ~10 8 K. 41

The Solar Standard Model (SSM) Best structural and evolutionary model to reproduce the observational properties of the Sun L = 3.842 10 33 [ergs/s] R = 6.9599 10 10 [cm] M = 1.9891 10 33 [gm] Spectroscopic observations Z/X =0.0245 (latest value seems to indicate Z = 0.013) Neglecting rotation, magnetic fields, and mass loss (dm/dt ~ 10 14 M /yr) Sun Fact Sheet http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/sunfact.html 42

bottleneck A succession of α, γ processes 16 O, 20 Ne, 24 Mg (the α-process) 43

C-buring ignites when Tc ~ (0.3-1.2) 10 9 K, i.e., for stars 15-30 M O-buring ignites when Tc ~ (1.5-2.6) 10 9 K, i.e., for stars > 15-30 M The p and α particles produced are captured immediately (because of the low Coulomb barriers) by heavy elements isotopes O burning Si 44

q PP = 2.4 10 6 ρ X 2 T 6 2/3 exp 33.8 T 6 1/3 erg g 1 s 1 q ρ X H 2 T 4 q CN = 8 10 27 ρ X X CN T 6 2/3 exp 152.3 T 6 1/3 erg g 1 s 1 q ρ X H X CN T 16 X CN X H = 0.02 ok for Pop I q 3α = 3.9 10 11 ρ 2 X 3 α T 3 8 exp 42.9 T 8 erg g 1 s 1 4.4 10 8 ρ 2 X 3 40 α T 8 erg g 1 s 1 (if T 8 1) Clayton 45

Photoionization Photodisintegration 46

For example, 16 O + α 20 Ne + γ If T < 10 9 K but if T 1.5 10 9 K in radiation field So 28 Si disintegrates at 3 10 9 K to lighter elements (then recaptured ) Until a nuclear statistical equilibrium is reached But the equilibrium is not exact pileup of the iron group nuclei (Fe, Co, Ni) which can resist photodisintegration until 7 10 9 K 47

Nuclear Fuel Process T threshold (10 6 K) Products Energy per nucleon (MeV) H p-p ~4 He 6.55 H CNO 15 He 6.25 He 3α 100 C, O 0.61 C C + C 600 O, Ne, Na, Mg 0.54 O O + O 1,000 Mg, S, P, Si ~0.3 Si Nuc. Equil. 3,000 Co, Fe, Ni <0.18 From Prialnik Table 4.1 48

56 Fe + 100 MeV 13 4 He + 4 n If T, even 4 He p + + n 0 So stellar interior has to be between a few T 6 and a few T 9. Lesson: Nuclear reaction that absorb energy from ambient radiation field (in stellar interior) can lead to catastrophic consequences. 49

Time Scales Different physical processes inside a star, e.g., nuclear reactions (changing chemical composition) are slow (longer time scales); structural adjustments ( dp dt) take places on relatively shorter time scales. Dynamical timescale Thermal timescale Nuclear timescale Diffusion timescale 52

Dynamical Timescale hydrostatic equilibrium perturbation motion adjustment hydrostatic equilibrium Free-fall collapse Equation of motion r = GM r r 2 1 ρ Near the star s surface r = R, M r = M, so R = GM dp dr R 2 1 ρ Free-fall means pressure gravity, so R GM R 2 Assuming a constant acceleration R = R 2 τ 2 ff, so τ ff = 2R 3 GM 1 2 = 1 ρ 2 1 2 0.04 ρ πg ρ 3 1 2 [d] dp dr 53

Stellar Pulsation The star pulsates about the equilibrium configuration same as dynamical timescale τ pul 1/ ρ Propagation of Sound Speed (pressure wave) Pressure induced perturbation, R τ 2 ff = R = GM + 1 dp 1 dp 2 R 2 ρ dr ρ dr 1 ρ P R so R τ ff P ρ c s (sound speed) T (for ideal gas) τ s R c s In general, τ dyn 1 G ρ 1.6 1015 n s = 1000 R R 3 M M [S] 54

Thermal Timescale Kelvin-Helmholtz timescale (radiation by gravitational contraction) E total = E grav + E thermal = 1 E 2 grav = 1 α GM 2 R 2 This amount of energy is radiated away at a rate L, so timescale τ KH = E total = 1 α GM 2 RL L 2 = 2 10 7 M 2 RL [yr] in solar units τ KH 2 10 7 M M 2 R R L L [yr] 55

M = 1 M, R = 1 pc τ dyn 1.6 10 7 yr τ ther 1 yr M = 1 M, R = 1 R τ dyn 1.6 10 3 s 30 min τ ther 3 10 7 yr 56

Nuclear Timescale Time taken to radiate at a rate of L on nuclear energy 4 1 H 4 He (Q = 6.3 10 18 erg/g) τ nuc = E nuc L = 6.3 1018 M L τ nuc 10 11 M M L L [yr] From the discussion above, τ nuc τ KH τ dyn 57

Main-Sequence Lifetime of the Sun M 2 10 33 g L 4 10 33 [ergs/s] Nuclear physics τ MS M 0.007 0.1 c 2 L Stellar physics = 3.15 10 17 s = 10 10 [yr] Given L MS L M M 4 τ MS 10 10 M M 3 [yr] 58

Diffusion Timescale Time taken for photons to randomly walk out from the stellar interior to eventual radiation from the surface r e = 1 e 2 4πε 0 m e c2 ( classical radius of the electron) σ Thomson = 8π 3 r e 2 = 6.6525 10 29 [m 2 ] for interactions with photon energy hν m e c 2 (electron rest energy) Thus, mean free path l = 1/ σ T n e, where for complete ionization of a hydrogen gas, n e = M/(m p R 3 ). So, l m p R 3 σ T M = 4 [mm] for the mean density. At the core, it is 100 times shorter. τ dif 10 4 [yr] (Exercise: Show this.) 59

For an isotropic gas P = 1 3 0 p vp n p dp - p and v p : relativistic case - n p : particle type & quantum statistics For a photon gas, p = hν/c, so P rad = 1 1 3 0 hν n ν dν = u = 1 3 3 at4, a = 7.565 10 15 ergs cm 3 K 4 60

Radiation Pressure P total = P radiation + P gas Since P rad ~ T 4 ~ But P tot ~ M 2 R 4 P rad P tot ~ M 2 M 4 R 4 So the more massive of stellar mass, the higher relative contribution by radiation pressure (and γ decreases to 4/3.) 61

P rad F = d P rad dr κρ dp rad dr = 4ac 3 ~ κρ c T3 dt L 4πr 2 dr = L 4πr 2 dp tot dr dp rad dp tot = Gm = ρ r 2 κl 4πcGm 62

P gas P rad P tot dp tot > dp rad L < 4πcGM κ m = M, P = 0, κl 4πcGm This is the Eddington luminosity limit = Maximum luminosity of a celestial object in balance between the radiation and gravitational force. L Edd L = 3.27 10 4 μ e M M L X < 10 38 erg sec 1 63

L 4πGm p σ T M L Edd 10 38 M M [erg s 1 ] M L Edd 5 10 4 L, M bol = 7.0 M M bol = 11.0 L 5 10 6 L M bol = 11.6 M 120 M 64

NGC 3372 α = 10: 45.1, b = 59: 52 (J2000) l = 287.7, b = 0.8 D = 2.3 kpc HST 3.0 x2.5. DSS image. AAO/ROE http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/nebulae/ngc3372.html 65

66

Evolution of the Sun in the HRD 67

Comparison of 1, 5, and 25 M stars 68