High Accuracy EUV Reflectometry and Scattering at the Advanced Light Source

Similar documents
The Periodic Table. Periodic Properties. Can you explain this graph? Valence Electrons. Valence Electrons. Paramagnetism

Element Cube Project (x2)

Atoms and the Periodic Table

The Periodic Table of Elements

Radiometric Dating (tap anywhere)

Ch. 9 NOTES ~ Chemical Bonding NOTE: Vocabulary terms are in boldface and underlined. Supporting details are in italics.

CLASS TEST GRADE 11. PHYSICAL SCIENCES: CHEMISTRY Test 4: Matter and materials 1

(C) Pavel Sedach and Prep101 1

Last 4 Digits of USC ID:

CHEM 10113, Quiz 5 October 26, 2011

Guide to the Extended Step-Pyramid Periodic Table

5 questions, 3 points each, 15 points total possible. 26 Fe Cu Ni Co Pd Ag Ru 101.

Chemistry 431 Practice Final Exam Fall Hours

(please print) (1) (18) H IIA IIIA IVA VA VIA VIIA He (2) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17)

Nucleus. Electron Cloud

PART 1 Introduction to Theory of Solids

Solutions and Ions. Pure Substances

Made the FIRST periodic table

PERIODIC TABLE OF THE ELEMENTS

DO NOW: Retrieve your projects. We will be reviewing them again today. Textbook pg 23, answer questions 1-3. Use the section 1.2 to help you.

Metallurgical Chemistry. An Audio Course for Students

Circle the letters only. NO ANSWERS in the Columns!

02/05/09 Last 4 Digits of USC ID: Dr. Jessica Parr

8. Relax and do well.

9/20/2017. Elements are Pure Substances that cannot be broken down into simpler substances by chemical change (contain Only One Type of Atom)

1 of 5 14/10/ :21

610B Final Exam Cover Page

NAME: FIRST EXAMINATION

CHEM 130 Exp. 8: Molecular Models

Chapter 12 The Atom & Periodic Table- part 2

7. Relax and do well.

Instructions. 1. Do not open the exam until you are told to start.

CHEM 107 (Spring-2005) Exam 3 (100 pts)

Lab Day and Time: Instructions. 1. Do not open the exam until you are told to start.

Using the Periodic Table

Atomic Structure & Interatomic Bonding

The exam must be written in ink. No calculators of any sort allowed. You have 2 hours to complete the exam. Periodic table 7 0

Marks for each question are as indicated in [] brackets.

CHEM 167 FINAL EXAM MONDAY, MAY 2 9:45 11:45 A.M GILMAN HALL

Secondary Support Pack. be introduced to some of the different elements within the periodic table;

Chapter 3: Stoichiometry

Modified from: Larry Scheffler Lincoln High School IB Chemistry 1-2.1

Speed of light c = m/s. x n e a x d x = 1. 2 n+1 a n π a. He Li Ne Na Ar K Ni 58.

B. X : in phase; Y: out of phase C. X : out of phase; Y: in phase D. X : out of phase; Y: out of phase

PHYSICAL SCIENCES MARCH CONTROLLED TEST GRADE

CMSC 313 Lecture 17 Postulates & Theorems of Boolean Algebra Semiconductors CMOS Logic Gates

Circle the letters only. NO ANSWERS in the Columns! (3 points each)

single-layer transition metal dichalcogenides MC2

HANDOUT SET GENERAL CHEMISTRY II

Lab Day and Time: Instructions. 1. Do not open the exam until you are told to start.

Chemistry Standard level Paper 1

CHM 101 PRACTICE TEST 1 Page 1 of 4

Atomic Emission Spectra. and. Flame Tests. Burlingame High School Chemistry

Lab Day and Time: Instructions. 1. Do not open the exam until you are told to start.

PHYSICAL SCIENCES GRADE : 10

Chemistry 2 Exam Roane State Academic Festival. Name (print neatly) School

The Periodic Table of the Elements

8. Relax and do well.

BROOKLYN COLLEGE Department of Chemistry. Chemistry 1 Second Lecture Exam Nov. 27, Name Page 1 of 5

If anything confuses you or is not clear, raise your hand and ask!

INSTRUCTIONS: Exam III. November 10, 1999 Lab Section

CHEM 108 (Spring-2008) Exam. 3 (105 pts)

Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences Chemistry Department. Semester Test 1. Analytical Chemistry CMY 283. Time: 120 min Marks: 100 Pages: 6

Advanced Placement. Chemistry. Integrated Rates

Chemistry 1 First Lecture Exam Fall Abbasi Khajo Levine Mathias Mathias/Ortiz Metlitsky Rahi Sanchez-Delgado Vasserman

1 Genesis 1:1. Chapter 10 Matter. Lesson. Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. (NKJV)

8. Relax and do well.

SCIENCE 1206 UNIT 2 CHEMISTRY. September 2017 November 2017

MANY ELECTRON ATOMS Chapter 15

M10/4/CHEMI/SPM/ENG/TZ2/XX+ CHEMISTRY. Wednesday 12 May 2010 (afternoon) 45 minutes INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES

Lab Day and Time: Instructions. 1. Do not open the exam until you are told to start.

CHEM Come to the PASS workshop with your mock exam complete. During the workshop you can work with other students to review your work.

What is the periodic table?

M14/4/CHEMI/SPM/ENG/TZ1/XX CHEMISTRY. Monday 19 May 2014 (afternoon) 45 minutes INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES

8. Relax and do well.

From Quantum to Matter 2005

K. 27 Co. 28 Ni. 29 Cu Rb. 46 Pd. 45 Rh. 47 Ag Cs Ir. 78 Pt.

Why all the repeating Why all the repeating Why all the repeating Why all the repeating

8. Relax and do well.

Spin Cut-off Parameter of Nuclear Level Density and Effective Moment of Inertia

CHEM 10123/10125, Exam 2

8. Relax and do well.


INSTRUCTIONS: CHEM Exam I. September 13, 1994 Lab Section

[ ]:543.4(075.8) 35.20: ,..,..,.., : /... ;. 2-. ISBN , - [ ]:543.4(075.8) 35.20:34.

UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY FACULTY OF SCIENCE MIDTERM EXAMINATION CHEMISTRY 353 READ ALL THE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY

8. Relax and do well.

X-RAY DATA BOOKLET Center for X-ray Optics and Advanced Light Source Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

7. Relax and do well.

Instructions. 1. Do not open the exam until you are told to start.

Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences Chemistry Department. Semester Test 1 MEMO. Analytical Chemistry CMY 283

HANDOUT SET GENERAL CHEMISTRY I

M09/4/CHEMI/SPM/ENG/TZ1/XX+ CHEMISTRY. Monday 18 May 2009 (afternoon) 45 minutes INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES

CHEM 172 EXAMINATION 1. January 15, 2009

CHEM 107 (Spring-2004) Exam 2 (100 pts)

Chem Exam 1. September 26, Dr. Susan E. Bates. Name 9:00 OR 10:00

Part 2. Multiple choice (use answer card). 90 pts. total. 3 pts. each.

Lab Day and Time: Instructions. 1. Do not open the exam until you are told to start. Page # Points possible Points awarded

30 Zn(s) 45 Rh. Pd(s) Ag(s) Cd(s) In(s) Sn(s) white. 77 Ir. Pt(s) Au. Hg(l) Tl. 109 Mt. 111 Uuu. 112 Uub. 110 Uun. 65 Tb. 62 Sm. 64 Gd. 63 Eu.

K. 27 Co. 28 Ni. 29 Cu Rb. 46 Pd. 45 Rh. 47 Ag Cs Ir. 78 Pt.

Transcription:

High Accuracy EUV Reflectometry and Scattering at the Advanced Light Source Eric Gullikson Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1

Reflectometry and Scattering Beamline (ALS 6.3.2) Commissioned Fall 1994 High accuracy reflectometry High spectral purity Novel VLS-PGM design 2

Reflectometry of EUVL Optics MET Secondary Mirror ETS C1 condensor mirror.

High Precision and Accuracy is Required The thickness control of the multilayer coatings must be better than the figure tolerance of the optics (~0.1 nm). This requires precise reflectometry. So as not to add figure errors, the multilayer coating thickness must be carefully controlled. The wavelength precision required to measure the multilayer thickness error is ±0.03% (3σ) for a figure tolerance of 0.1 nm.

High wavelength precision and accuracy are required for EUV mask reflectometry Mask tolerance driven by the illumination uniformity requirement. 1.01 1.00 Throughput 0.99 0.98 +- 0.7% +- 0.05 nm 0.97 0.96 13.25 13.30 13.35 13.40 13.45 13.50 Mask Wavelength (nm) Mask Uniformity < 1% (3σ) Wavelength Precision: 0.09% Wavelength Accuracy: 0.09% Reflectance Precision: 0.36%

High precision and accuracy is required for the reflectometry of multilayer coatings Minimum uncertainties ETS Beta-tool Ultimate Optics (rms Figure) 0.25 nm 0.1 nm 0.05 nm Wavelength Precision 0.06% 0.03% 0.015% Wavelength Accuracy 0.09% 0.09% 0.06% Mask (3σ Uniformity) 1% 1% 0.5% Wavelength Precision 0.09% 0.09% 0.06% Wavelength Accuracy 0.09% 0.09% 0.06% Reflectance Precision 0.36% 0.36% 0.18% 6

High precision is achieved 13.344 M1-010503A1D FS4038 Reflectance 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 M1-010503A1D_FS4038_PRE Wavelength (nm) 13.342 13.340 13.338 13.336 +/- 2 pm 13.334 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Date 0.0 13.0 13.2 13.4 13.6 13.8 Wavelength (nm) Reflectivity measurements of a standard multilayer mirror demonstrate the high precision in reflectivity and wavelength. Peak reflectance (%) 67.9 67.8 67.7 67.6 67.5 M1-010503A1D FS4038 +/- 0.10% (rel) 67.4 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Date 7

Accuracy tested in International Reflectivity Round Robins ALS BL 6.3.2 provided the standard measurements in the 2001 and 2006 international round-robins of EUV reflectometers. Most recently organized by SEMATECH the participants included NIST, PTB, New Subaru, NSLS (NRL), AIXUV and EUV Technology. The results were presented at the Fall 2006 International EUVL Symposium. Peak Reflectance Sample CXRO Sigma Other Sigma Difference FS9328 68.64 0.01 70.37 0.02 1.73 FS9112 68.55 0.038 68.6 0.05 0.05 FS9310 68.56 0.009 68.43 0.018-0.13 FS9329 68.62 0.007 69.12 0.104 0.5 FS9110 68.62 0.012 70.08 0.216 1.45 FS9326 68.57 0.061 68.54 0.261-0.03 Wavelength Sample CXRO Sigma Other Sigma Difference FS9328 13.443 0.001 13.437 0.000-0.006 FS9112 13.491 0.001 13.491 0.001 0.000 FS9310 13.500 0.000 13.501 0.001 0.001 FS9329 13.491 0.001 13.495 0.001 0.004 FS9110 13.445 0.001 13.433 0.002-0.013 FS9326 13.442 0.001 13.467 0.003 0.025 8

EUV optics lifetime Contamination is a serious concern for the optics in EUVL steppers due to the high power and outgassing from resists or vacuum components. Debris from the source limits the lifetime of collector optics. Accelerated contamination testing results in very small changes in reflectivity. Reflectivity measurements with high accuracy and spatial resolution are required. 9

Scattering from normal incidence optics As the wavelength is reduced scattering increases roughly as 1/λ 2. Roughness of optical surfaces must be controlled or scattering will result in loss of contrast. Scattering can significantly impact the ability to utilize the light from high emmitance sources. 10

EUV scattering from can be predicted from measured surface roughness

The effects of scattering have been verified for a multi-element EUV imaging system image = PSF * object The PSF is proportional to the angular scattering distribution. PSF sc ( r) = 1 2 ρ 1 P R 0 dp dω For a multi-element imaging system: 2 16π S 2 α nr PSF ( r) = A( r) S + α n PSD ( ) 4 2 n λ ρ λρ The flare was measured for the assembled systems at ALS 12.0.1. Excellent agreement with predictions was demonstrated. Flare (%) 25 20 15 10 5 0 Predicted Measured 1 10 100 Linewidth (μm) 12

EUV scattering provides an independent test of standard roughness measurements Improvements in the roughness optics and mask substrates will push the limits of the standard roughness metrology tools (AFM and optical micro-interferometry). EUV scattering can provide the independent measurements of surface roughness needed to validate the standard metrology tools. Power Spectral Density (nm 4 ) 1000 100 10 1 0.1 θ 1 =5 deg θ 1 =10 deg AFM HSQ313UB 0.01 1E-4 1E-3 0.01 0.1 Spatial Frequency (1/nm) 13

Scattered Light Limits Spectral Purity Scattering from a monochromator grating leads to spectrally impure light which limits reflectance measurement accuracy. Photodiode Current (na) 1 0.1 0.01 Monochromatic Peak Scattered Light Background 11.3 nm 13.4 nm 14.5 nm 1E-3 0 5 10 15 20 Wavelength (nm) Measurements of spectral contamination in BL6.3.2 (2001)

In a collaborative effort with Hitachi both diffraction efficiency and scattered light were improved 50 Hitachi 200 l/mm gratings 1 hν=92 ev 40 0.1 Efficiency (%) 30 20 Intensity 0.01 1E-3 10 Old grating New grating 0 0 50 100 150 200 Photon energy (ev) 1E-4 Old grating New grating 1E-5 0 2 4 6 8 Angle (deg)

The reduced scattered light led to improved reflectance accuracy 0.68 0.67 AP1 in AP1 out Old Grating CXRO4023 0.68 0.67 AP1 in AP1 out New Grating CXRO4023 Reflectance 0.66 0.65 Reflectance 0.66 0.65 0.64 0.64 0.63 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 13.6 Wavelength (nm) Using the new grating there is no observable change in reflectivity using an aperture to block the scattered light. Peak reflectance (%) 0.63 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 13.6 67.60 67.55 67.50 67.45 Wavelength (nm) Repeatability 28 July 2005 AP1 in 67.51% σ=0.011% (abs) AP1 out 67.51% σ=0.008% (abs) 67.40 0 5 10 15 20 Measurement CXRO4023

X-Ray Interactions with Matter website December 1993 Mosaic browser released. October 1994 First Netscape browser. October 1995 X-ray interactions with matter website introduced at the SRI95 meeting at the APS. Today ~ 1 million hits per year. ~ 4000 users each month. 17

The atomic scattering factors are revised as new measurements are made Zirconium (Z=40) At BL 6.3.2, new measurements have been made for 14 elements. Many studies performed as part of student thesis research. Absorption coefficient (cm 2 /gm) 10 5 10 4 Accessible with new 80 l/mm grating CXRO Tables ALS 6.3.2 H He Li Be B C N O F Ne Na Mg Al Si P S Cl Ar K Ca Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Kr Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Tc Ru Rh Pd Ag Cd In Sn Sb Te I Xe Cs Ba Hf Ta W Re Os Ir Pt Au Hg Tl Pb Bi Po At Rn Fr Ra La Ce Pr Nd Pm Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu Ac Th Pa U Np Pu Am Cm Bk Cf Es Fm Md No Lr Measured on BL632 Absorption coefficient (cm 2 /gm) 10 3 10 100 1000 Photon energy (ev) 10 5 10 4 Tantalum (Z=73) CXRO Tables Measured (ALS 6.3.2) 10 3 10 100 1000 Photon energy (ev) 18

EUV optical properties of photoresists Particular interest in the the EUV optical properties of materials for: photoresists mask materials filters Reflectance PMMA (λ=13.5 nm) 1 δ=0.0242, β=0.0054 0.1 0.01 1E-3 1E-4 d = 286.5 nm 1E-5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Angle (deg) Kwark Young-Je, JP Bravo-Vasquez, M Chandhok, H Cao, Deng Hai, E Gullikson, CK Ober, "Absorbance measurement of polymers at extreme ultraviolet wavelength: correlation between experimental and theoretical calculations." JVST B 24, 1822 (July 2006). 19

Accuracy of the scattering factors can be improved for many elements in the soft x-ray and EUV range Lots of room for improvement. H He Li Be B C N O F Ne Na Mg Al Si P S Cl Ar K Ca Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Kr Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Tc Ru Rh Pd Ag Cd In Sn Sb Te I Xe Cs Ba Hf Ta W Re Os Ir Pt Au Hg Tl Pb Bi Po At Rn Fr Ra La Ce Pr Nd Pm Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu Ac Th Pa U Np Pu Am Cm Bk Cf Es Fm Md No Lr Good Accuracy Moderate Poor Accuracy 20

Summary Accurate reflectometry has been pushed forward by the developments in EUV lithography. EUV scattering have provided confidence in our ability to predict the flare of EUV optics. Spectral purity is an important issue for reflectometry. Improvements in diffraction gratings have allowed for improved spectral purity of EUV monochromators. Accurate measurements of EUV optical constants are important for EUV masks, filters, photoresists,...

Thank you! 22