G : Statistical Mechanics

Similar documents
Note 2. Ling fong Li. 1 Klein Gordon Equation Probablity interpretation Solutions to Klein-Gordon Equation... 2

22.51 Quantum Theory of Radiation Interactions

( ) r! t. Equation (1.1) is the result of the following two definitions. First, the bracket is by definition a scalar product.

763622S ADVANCED QUANTUM MECHANICS Solution Set 1 Spring c n a n. c n 2 = 1.

ψ = i c i u i c i a i b i u i = i b 0 0 b 0 0

3. Stress-strain relationships of a composite layer

14 The Postulates of Quantum mechanics

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Canonical Transformation II

n α j x j = 0 j=1 has a nontrivial solution. Here A is the n k matrix whose jth column is the vector for all t j=0

Lecture 6/7 (February 10/12, 2014) DIRAC EQUATION. The non-relativistic Schrödinger equation was obtained by noting that the Hamiltonian 2

k p theory for bulk semiconductors

Quantum Statistical Mechanics

Canonical transformations

PHYS 215C: Quantum Mechanics (Spring 2017) Problem Set 3 Solutions

ELASTIC WAVE PROPAGATION IN A CONTINUOUS MEDIUM

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Calculus of Variations II

The Feynman path integral

Chapter 6. Rotations and Tensors

C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 3 Solutions Out: Oct 1, 2008., where ( 00. ), so the overall state of the system is ) ( ( ( ( 00 ± 11 ), Φ ± = 1

Nested case-control and case-cohort studies

Lecture 12: Discrete Laplacian

LECTURE 21 Mohr s Method for Calculation of General Displacements. 1 The Reciprocal Theorem

Salmon: Lectures on partial differential equations. Consider the general linear, second-order PDE in the form. ,x 2

Quantum Mechanics I - Session 4

Quantum Runge-Lenz Vector and the Hydrogen Atom, the hidden SO(4) symmetry

Snce h( q^; q) = hq ~ and h( p^ ; p) = hp, one can wrte ~ h hq hp = hq ~hp ~ (7) the uncertanty relaton for an arbtrary state. The states that mnmze t

CHAPTER 14 GENERAL PERTURBATION THEORY

2. Postulates of Quantum Mechanics. [Last revised: Friday 7 th December, 2018, 21:27]

Inner Product. Euclidean Space. Orthonormal Basis. Orthogonal

Physics 607 Exam 1. ( ) = 1, Γ( z +1) = zγ( z) x n e x2 dx = 1. e x2

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

Quantum Mechanics for Scientists and Engineers. David Miller

MARKOV CHAIN AND HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL

Thermodynamics and statistical mechanics in materials modelling II

2.3 Nilpotent endomorphisms

Poisson brackets and canonical transformations

On the Power Function of the Likelihood Ratio Test for MANOVA

The line method combined with spectral chebyshev for space-time fractional diffusion equation

Thermodynamics II. Department of Chemical Engineering. Prof. Kim, Jong Hak

Phys304 Quantum Physics II (2005) Quantum Mechanics Summary. 2. This kind of behaviour can be described in the mathematical language of vectors:

The non-negativity of probabilities and the collapse of state

ON MECHANICS WITH VARIABLE NONCOMMUTATIVITY

THEOREMS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

Module III, Lecture 02: Correlation Functions and Spectral Densities

Crystal Interpretation of Kerov Kirillov Reshetikhin Bijection II

1 Vectors over the complex numbers

Einstein Summation Convention

COXREG. Estimation (1)

Bezier curves. Michael S. Floater. August 25, These notes provide an introduction to Bezier curves. i=0

CHAPTER 6 BOLTZMANN'S H-THEOREM

A how to guide to second quantization method.

Ph 219a/CS 219a. Exercises Due: Wednesday 23 October 2013

Physics 443, Solutions to PS 7

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. D Alembert s Principle and The Lagrangian-1

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Principle of Virtual Work-1

1 Rabi oscillations. Physical Chemistry V Solution II 8 March 2013

we have E Y x t ( ( xl)) 1 ( xl), e a in I( Λ ) are as follows:

Linear Approximation with Regularization and Moving Least Squares

Feb 14: Spatial analysis of data fields

From Biot-Savart Law to Divergence of B (1)

SOME CHARACTERS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP R. E. INGRAM, SJ.

L-Edge Chromatic Number Of A Graph

Module 1 : The equation of continuity. Lecture 1: Equation of Continuity

EPR Paradox and the Physical Meaning of an Experiment in Quantum Mechanics. Vesselin C. Noninski

Lorentz Group. Ling Fong Li. 1 Lorentz group Generators Simple representations... 3

Lecture 14: Forces and Stresses

Density matrix. c α (t)φ α (q)

Foundations of Arithmetic

Solution 1 for USTC class Physics of Quantum Information

coordinates. Then, the position vectors are described by

An Inequality for the trace of matrix products, using absolute values

A finite difference method for heat equation in the unbounded domain

12. The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation Michael Fowler

9 Characteristic classes

Asymptotics of the Solution of a Boundary Value. Problem for One-Characteristic Differential. Equation Degenerating into a Parabolic Equation

In this section is given an overview of the common elasticity models.

Grover s Algorithm + Quantum Zeno Effect + Vaidman

Transfer Functions. Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: ( ) system

A DIMENSION-REDUCTION METHOD FOR STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS SECOND-MOMENT ANALYSIS

Bernoulli Numbers and Polynomials

The Order Relation and Trace Inequalities for. Hermitian Operators

Norms, Condition Numbers, Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors

7. Products and matrix elements

APPENDIX A Some Linear Algebra

Solution 1 for USTC class Physics of Quantum Information

The Multiple Classical Linear Regression Model (CLRM): Specification and Assumptions. 1. Introduction

Now that we have laws or better postulates we should explore what they imply

Research on Complex Networks Control Based on Fuzzy Integral Sliding Theory

More metrics on cartesian products

3.1 Expectation of Functions of Several Random Variables. )' be a k-dimensional discrete or continuous random vector, with joint PMF p (, E X E X1 E X

1 (1 + ( )) = 1 8 ( ) = (c) Carrying out the Taylor expansion, in this case, the series truncates at second order:

THE VIBRATIONS OF MOLECULES II THE CARBON DIOXIDE MOLECULE Student Instructions

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Newtonian Mechanics

CHAPTER 5 NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC RESPONSE

CHAPTER 5: Lie Differentiation and Angular Momentum

10. Canonical Transformations Michael Fowler

= = = (a) Use the MATLAB command rref to solve the system. (b) Let A be the coefficient matrix and B be the right-hand side of the system.

Monica Purcaru and Nicoleta Aldea. Abstract

Mechanics Physics 151

Predicting Model of Traffic Volume Based on Grey-Markov

Transcription:

G25.2651: Statstca Mechancs Notes for Lecture 11 I. PRINCIPLES OF QUANTUM STATISTICAL MECHANICS The probem of quantum statstca mechancs s the quantum mechanca treatment of an N-partce system. Suppose the correspondng N-partce cassca system has Cartesan coordnates and momenta and Hamtonan q 1,..., q 3N p 1,..., p 3N H = 3N =1 p 2 2m + U(q 1,..., q 3N ) Then, as we have seen, the quantum mechanca probem conssts of determnng the state vector Ψ(t) from the Schrödnger equaton H Ψ(t) = t Ψ(t) Denotng the correspondng operators, Q 1,..., Q 3N and P 1,..., P 3N, we note that these operators satsfy the commutaton reatons: [Q, Q j ] = [P, P j ] = 0 [Q, P j ] = Iδ j and the many-partce coordnate egenstate q 1...q 3N s a tensor product of the ndvdua egenstate q 1,..., q 3N : q 1...q 3N = q 1 q 3N The Schrödnger equaton can be cast as a parta dfferenta equaton by mutpyng both sdes by q 1...q 3N : [ 3N =1 h 2 2m 2 q 2 + U(q 1,..., q 3N ) q 1...q 3N H Ψ(t) = t q 1...q 3N Ψ(t) ] Ψ(q 1,..., q 3N, t) = t Ψ(q 1,..., q 3N, t) where the many-partce wave functon s Ψ(q 1,..., q 3N, t) = q 1...q 3N Ψ(t). Smary, the expectaton vaue of an operator A = A(Q 1,..., Q 3N, P 1,..., P 3N ) s gven by ( A = dq 1 dq 3N Ψ (q 1,..., q 3N )A q 1,..., q 3N, h,..., h ) Ψ(q 1,..., q 3N ) q 1 q 3N 1

A. The densty matrx and densty operator In genera, the many-body wave functon Ψ(q 1,..., q 3N, t) s far too arge to cacuate for a macroscopc system. If we wsh to represent t on a grd wth just 10 ponts aong each coordnate drecton, then for N = 10 23, we woud need 10 1023 tota ponts, whch s ceary enormous. We wsh, therefore, to use the concept of ensembes n order to express expectaton vaues of observabes A wthout requrng drect computaton of the wavefuncton. Let us, therefore, ntroduce an ensembe of systems, wth a tota of members, and each havng a state vector Ψ (α), α = 1,...,. Furthermore, ntroduce an orthonorma set of vectors φ ( φ φ j = δ j ) and expand the state vector for each member of the ensembe n ths orthonorma set: Ψ (α) = φ The expectaton vaue of an observabe, averaged over the ensembe of systems s gven by the average of the expectaton vaue of the observabe computed wth respect to each member of the ensembe: A = 1 Substtutng n the expanson for Ψ (α), we obtan Let us defne a matrx and a smar matrx Ψ (α) A Ψ (α) A = 1, = ( 1, ρ = ρ = 1 φ A φ ) φ A φ Thus, ρ s a sum over the ensembe members of a product of expanson coeffcents, whe ρ s an average over the ensembe of ths product. Aso, et A = φ A φ. Then, the expectaton vaue can be wrtten as foows: A = 1 ρ A = 1 (ρa) = 1 Tr(ρA) = Tr( ρa), where ρ and A represent the matrces wth eements ρ and A n the bass of vectors { φ }. The matrx ρ s nown as the densty matrx. There s an abstract operator correspondng to ths matrx that s bass-ndependent. It can be seen that the operator and smary ρ = Ψ (α) Ψ (α) ρ = 1 Ψ (α) Ψ (α) 2

have matrx eements ρ when evauated n the bass set of vectors { φ }. φ ρ φ = Note that ρ s a hermtan operator φ Ψ (α) Ψ (α) φ = ρ = ρ = ρ so that ts egenvectors form a compete orthonorma set of vectors that span the Hbert space. If w and w represent the egenvaues and egenvectors of the operator ρ, respectvey, then severa mportant propertes they must satsfy can be deduced. Frsty, et A be the dentty operator I. Then, snce I = 1, t foows that 1 = 1 Tr(ρ) = Tr( ρ) = w Thus, the egenvaues of ρ must sum to 1. Next, et A be a projector onto an egenstate of ρ, A = w w P. Then But, snce ρ can be expressed as P = Tr( ρ w w ) ρ = w w w and the trace, beng bass set ndependent, can be therefore be evauated n the bass of egenvectors of ρ, the expectaton vaue becomes P = j w j w w w w w w j =,j w δ j δ δ j = w However, P = 1 = 1 Ψ (α) w w Ψ (α) Ψ (α) w 2 0 Thus, w 0. Combnng these two resuts, we see that, snce w = 1 and w 0, 0 w 1, so that w satsfy the propertes of probabtes. Wth ths n mnd, we can deveop a physca meanng for the densty matrx. Let us now consder the expectaton vaue of a projector a a P a onto one of the egenstates of the operator A. The expectaton vaue of ths operator s gven by P a = 1 Ψ (α) P a Ψ (α) = 1 Ψ (α) a a Ψ (α) = 1 a Ψ (α) 2 But a Ψ (α) 2 P a (α) s just probabty that a measurement of the operator A n the αth member of the ensembe w yed the resut a. Thus, P a = 1 3 P P (α) a

or the expectaton vaue of P a s just the ensembe averaged probabty of obtanng the vaue a n each member of the ensembe. However, note that the expectaton vaue of P a can aso be wrtten as P a = Tr( ρp a ) = Tr( w w w a a ) =, w w w w a a w =, = w δ w a a w w a w 2 Equatng the two expressons gves 1 P a (α) = w a w 2 The nterpretaton of ths equaton s that the ensembe averaged probabty of obtanng the vaue a f A s measured s equa to the probabty of obtanng the vaue a n a measurement of A f the state of the system under consderaton were the state w, weghted by the average probabty w that the system n the ensembe s n that state. Therefore, the densty operator ρ (or ρ) pays the same roe n quantum systems that the phase space dstrbuton functon f(γ) pays n cassca systems. B. Tme evouton of the densty operator The tme evouton of the operator ρ can be predcted drecty from the Schrödnger equaton. Snce ρ(t) s gven by the tme dervatve s gven by ρ t = 1 [H, ρ] ρ t = = 1 ρ(t) = Ψ (α) (t) Ψ (α) (t) [( ) ( )] t Ψ(α) (t) Ψ (α) (t) + Ψ (α) (t) t Ψ(α) (t) = 1 (Hρ ρh) = 1 [H, ρ] [( ) ( )] H Ψ (α) (t) Ψ (α) (t) Ψ (α) (t) Ψ (α) (t) H where the second ne foows from the fact that the Schrödnger equaton for the bra state vector Ψ (α) (t) s t Ψ(α) (t) = Ψ (α) (t) H Note that the equaton of moton for ρ(t) dffers from the usua Hesenberg equaton by a mnus sgn! Snce ρ(t) s constructed from state vectors, t s not an observabe e other hermtan operators, so there s no reason to expect that ts tme evouton w be the same. The genera souton to ts equaton of moton s ρ(t) = e Ht/ h ρ(0)e Ht/ h = U(t)ρ(0)U (t) The equaton of moton for ρ(t) can be cast nto a quantum Louve equaton by ntroducng an operator 4

In term of L, t can be seen that ρ(t) satsfes L = 1 [..., H] ρ t = Lρ ρ(t) = e Lt ρ(0) What nd of operator s L? It acts on an operator and returns another operator. Thus, t s not an operator n the ordnary sense, but s nown as a superoperator or tetradc operator (see S. Muame, Prncpes of Nonnear Optca Spectroscopy, Oxford Unversty Press, New Yor (1995)). Defnng the evouton equaton for ρ ths way, we have a perfect anaogy between the densty matrx and the state vector. The two equatons of moton are t Ψ(t) = ī h H Ψ(t) ρ(t) = Lρ(t) t We aso have an anaogy wth the evouton of the cassca phase space dstrbuton f(γ, t), whch satsfes f t = Lf wth L = {..., H} beng the cassca Louve operator. Agan, we see that the mt of a commutator s the cassca Posson bracet. C. The quantum equbrum ensembes At equbrum, the densty operator does not evove n tme; thus, ρ/t = 0. Thus, from the equaton of moton, f ths hods, then [H, ρ] = 0, and ρ(t) s a constant of the moton. Ths means that t can be smutaneousy dagonazed wth the Hamtonan and can be expressed as a pure functon of the Hamtonan ρ = f(h) Therefore, the egenstates of ρ, the vectors, we caed w are the egenvectors E of the Hamtonan, and we can wrte H and ρ as H = ρ = E E E f(e ) E E The choce of the functon f determnes the ensembe. 1. The mcrocanonca ensembe Athough we w have practcay no occason to use the quantum mcrocanonca ensembe (we reed on t more heavy n cassca statstca mechancs), for competeness, we defne t here. The functon f, for ths ensembe, s f(e )δe = θ(e (E + δe)) θ(e E) where θ(x) s the Heavsde step functon. Ths says that f(e )δe s 1 f E < E < (E + δe) and 0 otherwse. The partton functon for the ensembe s Tr(ρ), snce the trace of ρ s the number of members n the ensembe: Ω(N, V, E) = Tr(ρ) = [θ(e (E + δe)) θ(e E)] 5

The thermodynamcs that are derved from ths partton functon are exacty the same as they are n the cassca case: etc. S(N, V, E) = n Ω(N, V, E) ( ) 1 n Ω T = E N,V 2. The canonca ensembe In anaogy to the cassca canonca ensembe, the quantum canonca ensembe s defned by ρ = e βh f(e ) = e βe Thus, the quantum canonca partton functon s gven by Q(N, V, T) = Tr(e βh ) = e βe and the thermodynamcs derved from t are the same as n the cassca case: etc. Note that the expectaton vaue of an observabe A s A(N, V, T) = 1 n Q(N, V, T) β E(N, V, T) = nq(n, V, T) β P(N, V, T) = 1 nq(n, V, T) β V A = 1 Q Tr(Ae βh ) Evauatng the trace n the bass of egenvectors of H (and of ρ), we obtan A = 1 E Ae βh E = 1 e βe E A E Q Q The quantum canonca ensembe w be partcuary usefu to us n many thngs to come. 3. Isotherma-sobarc and grand canonca ensembes Aso usefu are the sotherma-sobarc and grand canonca ensembes, whch are defned just as they are for the cassca cases: (N, P, T) = (µ, V, T) = 0 dv e βpv Q(N, V, T) = e βµn Q(N, V, T) = N=0 N=0 0 dv Tr(e β(h+pv ) ) Tr(e β(h µn) ) 6

D. A smpe exampe the quantum harmonc oscator As a smpe exampe of the trace procedure, et us consder the quantum harmonc oscator. The Hamtonan s gven by and the egenvaues of H are Thus, the canonca partton functon s E n = Q(β) = H = P 2 2m + 1 2 mω2 X 2 ( n + 1 ) hω, n = 0, 1, 2,... 2 e β(n+1/2) hω = e β hω/2 ( e β hω ) n n=0 Ths s a geometrc seres, whch can be summed anaytcay, gvng Q(β) = e β hω/2 1 e β hω = 1 e β hω/2 e β hω/2 = 1 2 csch(β hω/2) The thermodynamcs derved from t as as foows: 1. Free energy: The free energy s n=0 A = 1 β nq(β) = hω 2 + 1 β n( 1 e β hω) 2. Average energy: The average energy E = H s E = β nq(β) = hω 2 + hωe β hω 1 e β hω = ( ) 1 2 + n hω 3. Entropy The entropy s gven by S = nq(β) + E T = n ( 1 e β hω) + hω T e β hω 1 e β hω Now consder the cassca expressons. Reca that the partton functon s gven by ( ) Q(β) = 1 dpdxe β p 2 2m + 1 2 mω2 x 2 = 1 ( ) 1/2 ( ) 1/2 2πm 2π h h β βmω 2 = 2π βωh = 1 β hω Thus, the cassca free energy s A c = 1 β n(β hω) In the cassca mt, we may tae h to be sma. Thus, the quantum expresson for A becomes, approxmatey, n ths mt: and we see that A Q hω 2 + 1 β n(β hω) A Q A c hω 2 The resdua hω/2 (whch truy vanshes when h 0) s nown as the quantum zero pont energy. It s a pure quantum effect and s present because the owest energy quantum mechancay s not E = 0 but the ground state energy E = hω/2. 7