Equations of Motion for Micro Air Vehicles

Similar documents
UAV Coordinate Frames and Rigid Body Dynamics

16.333: Lecture #3. Frame Rotations. Euler Angles. Quaternions

Lecture AC-1. Aircraft Dynamics. Copy right 2003 by Jon at h an H ow

Autonomous Fixed Wing Air Vehicles

Quadrotor Dynamics and Control Rev 0.1

Chapter 4 The Equations of Motion

Dynamics and Control of Rotorcraft

Applications Linear Control Design Techniques in Aircraft Control I

Aircraft Flight Dynamics & Vortex Lattice Codes

UAVBook Supplement Full State Direct and Indirect EKF

UNCLASSIFIED. Control of Spinning Symmetric Airframes. Curtis P. Mracek Max Stafford and Mike Unger Raytheon Systems Company Tucson, AZ 85734

Chapter 1. Introduction. 1.1 System Architecture

AA 242B/ ME 242B: Mechanical Vibrations (Spring 2016)

A SIMPLIFIED ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS AND CONCEPTUAL CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN

Linear Flight Control Techniques for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

AE Stability and Control of Aerospace Vehicles

Developing a Framework for Control of Agile Aircraft Platforms in Autonomous Hover

Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics

Direct spatial motion simulation of aircraft subjected to engine failure

Spacecraft and Aircraft Dynamics

CHAPTER 1. Introduction

uavbook supplement January 22, 2019 Small Unmanned Aircraft

Chapter 1 Lecture 2. Introduction 2. Topics. Chapter-1

LPV model reference control for fixed-wing UAVs

AE Stability and Control of Aerospace Vehicles

NONLINEAR CONTROL OF A HELICOPTER BASED UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE MODEL

/ m U) β - r dr/dt=(n β / C) β+ (N r /C) r [8+8] (c) Effective angle of attack. [4+6+6]

Problem 1: Ship Path-Following Control System (35%)

Adaptive Trim and Trajectory Following for a Tilt-Rotor Tricopter Ahmad Ansari, Anna Prach, and Dennis S. Bernstein

DYNAMICS & CONTROL OF UNDERWATER GLIDERS I: STEADY MOTIONS. N. Mahmoudian, J. Geisbert, & C. Woolsey. acas

Adaptive Control of Micro Air Vehicles

Formation Control of Multi Agent System in Cyclic Pursuit with Varying Inter-Agent Distance

Chapter 9. Nonlinear Design Models. Beard & McLain, Small Unmanned Aircraft, Princeton University Press, 2012, Chapter 9, Slide 1

Fundamentals of Airplane Flight Mechanics

April 15, 2011 Sample Quiz and Exam Questions D. A. Caughey Page 1 of 9

Flight Control Simulators for Unmanned Fixed-Wing and VTOL Aircraft

Linearized Equations of Motion!

Linearized Longitudinal Equations of Motion Robert Stengel, Aircraft Flight Dynamics MAE 331, 2018

Sailing Performance and Maneuverability of a Traditional Ryukyuan Tribute Ship

Introduction to Flight Dynamics

Stability and Control

c 2016 Jan Willem Vervoorst

MODELING AND DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF A MULTI-JOINT MORPHING AIRCRAFT

Aerobatic Maneuvering of Miniature Air Vehicles Using Attitude Trajectories

Chapter 10. Path Following. Beard & McLain, Small Unmanned Aircraft, Princeton University Press, 2012, Chapter 10, Slide 1

Aerial Rendezvous Between an Unmanned Air Vehicle and an Orbiting Target Vehicle

Feasibility study of a novel method for real-time aerodynamic coefficient estimation

Minimal Altitude Loss Pullout Maneuvers

Autopilot design for small fixed wing aerial vehicles. Randy Beard Brigham Young University

Topic # Feedback Control

Design and modelling of an airship station holding controller for low cost satellite operations

AM25 UNMANNED AIR VEHICLE FLIGHT CONTROL

Lecture #AC 3. Aircraft Lateral Dynamics. Spiral, Roll, and Dutch Roll Modes

Modeling of a Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

Dynamics exploration and aggressive maneuvering of a Longitudinal Vectored Thrust VTOL aircraft

Mechanics of Flight. Warren F. Phillips. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Professor Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Utah State University WILEY

TTK4190 Guidance and Control Exam Suggested Solution Spring 2011

AUTOMATIC AIRSPACE AVOIDANCE USING ADVANCED FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM

Lecture 11 Overview of Flight Dynamics I. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

Modeling and Sliding Mode Control of a Quadrotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

NONLINEAR SIMULATION OF A MICRO AIR VEHICLE

Nonlinear Landing Control for Quadrotor UAVs

Aerodynamics SYST 460/560. George Mason University Fall 2008 CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH. Copyright Lance Sherry (2008)

MATHEMATICAL MODELS FOR CONTROL OF AIRCRAFT AND SATELLITES THOR I. FOSSEN

Modeling and Control Strategy for the Transition of a Convertible Tail-sitter UAV

Optimal Control, Guidance and Estimation. Lecture 17. Overview of Flight Dynamics III. Prof. Radhakant Padhi. Prof.

Sensor Fault Diagnosis in Quadrotors Using Nonlinear Adaptive Estimators

Flight Dynamics and Control

Modeling and Control of mini UAV

Stability and Control Analysis in Twin-Boom Vertical Stabilizer Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)

Single GPS antenna attitude determination of a fixed wing aircraft aided with aircraft aerodynamics

Simulation of Kinematic and Dynamic Models of an Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle

Robot Control Basics CS 685

Non-linear Dynamic Inversion

DYNAMIC MODELING AND STABILITY ANALYSIS OF A HIGH ALTITUDE AIRSHIP

Flight Test Results for Circular Path Following by Model Predictive Control

Modeling and Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation for a Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

ABSTRACT. Bei, Lu. Linear Parameter-Varying Control of an F-16 Aircraft at High Angle of Attack. (Under the direction of Dr. Fen Wu).

Dynamic Modeling of Fixed-Wing UAVs

2 Rotation Kinematics

Small lightweight aircraft navigation in the presence of wind

Aircraft Equations of Motion: Translation and Rotation Robert Stengel, Aircraft Flight Dynamics, MAE 331, 2018

Incremental control and guidance of hybrid aircraft applied to the Cyclone tailsitter UAV

Aggressive Maneuvering Flight Tests of a Miniature Robotic Helicopter

Robot Dynamics Fixed-wing UAVs: Dynamic Modeling and Control

Aircraft Performance, Stability and control with experiments in Flight. Questions

Development of a novel method for autonomous navigation and landing of unmanned aerial vehicles

Non-linear Model Predictive Control for Longitudinal and Lateral Guidance of a Small Fixed-Wing UAV in Precision Deep Stall Landing

Near-Hover Flapping Wing MAV Aerodynamic Modelling - a linear model approach

Research Article Shorter Path Design and Control for an Underactuated Satellite

Optimal Control, Guidance and Estimation. Lecture 16. Overview of Flight Dynamics II. Prof. Radhakant Padhi. Prof. Radhakant Padhi

Flight and Orbital Mechanics

State Estimation for Autopilot Control of Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Windy Conditions

The Generalized Missile Equations of Motion

Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II. Tecniche di Simulazione di Volo

Nonlinear Wind Estimator Based on Lyapunov

Robust Nonlinear Design of Three Axes Missile Autopilot via Feedback Linearization

Fault-Tolerant Control of a Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Partial Wing Loss

SMALL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT

Traction Power Generation with Tethered Wings

Transcription:

Equations of Motion for Micro Air Vehicles September, 005 Randal W. Beard, Associate Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Brigham Young University Provo, Utah 84604 USA voice: (80 4-839 fax: (80 4-00 beard@ee.byu.edu

CONTENTS CONTENTS Contents Cover Page Table of Contents i ii UAV Coordinate Frames UAV State Variables 3 3 UAV Model 3 4 Linear Pitch Model 5 5 Linear Roll Model 7 6 Trim 7 7 Linearization 8 7. Longitudinal Dynamics.......................................... 8 7. Lateral Dynamics............................................. 9 7.3 Coefficients from Aviones........................................ 0 8 Transfer Functions 0 ii

UAV COORDINATE FRAMES UAV Coordinate Frames For UAVs there are several coordinate systems that are of interest. The inertial frame C I. The inertial coordinate system is an earth fixed coordinate system with origin at the defined home location. The x-axis of C I points North, the y-axis points East, and the z axis points toward the center of the earth. The vehicle frame C v. The origin of the vehicle frame is at the center of mass of the UAV. However, the axes of C v are aligned with the axis of the inertial frame C I. In other words, the x-axis points North, the y-axis points East, and the z-axis points toward the center of the earth. The body frame C b. The origin of the body frame is also at the center of mass of the UAV. The x-axis points out the nose of the UAV, the y-axis points out the right wing, and the z-axis point out the belly. As the attitude of the UAV moves, the body frame remains fixed with respect to the airframe. The wind frame C w. To maintain lift, the UAV is required to maintain a positive pitch angle with respect to the velocity vector of the UAV. It is often convenient to align the body fixed reference frame with the velocity vector. This is the purpose of the wind frame. The origin of the wind frame is the center of mass of the UAV. The x-axis is aligned with the projection of the velocity vector on the x z plane of the body axis. The y- axis points out the right wing of the UAV and the z-axis is constructed to complete a right handed orthogonal coordinate systems. Figure shows the body and the wind axes. The velocity vectory of the UAV points in the direction of the x w axis which makes a angle α with the x b axis. Figure : The body and the wind axes of the UAV. The x-axis of the body frame C b is aligned with the body of the UAV, whereas the x-axis of the wind frame C w is aligned with the velocity vector of the UAV. The angle between x b and x w is the angle of attack α. The orientation of an aircraft is specified by three angles, roll (φ, pitch (θ, and yaw (ψ, which are called the Euler angles. The yaw angle is defined as the rotation ψ about the z v -axis in the vehicle frame C v. The resulting coordinate frame is denoted C and is shown in Figure. It can be seen from the figure that the transformation from C v to C is given by cos(ψ sin(ψ 0 R yaw (ψ R v sin(ψ cos(ψ 0. 0 0

UAV COORDINATE FRAMES C v x v y ψ C x ψ y v z z v Figure : Yaw Angle. The pitch angle is defined as the rotation θ about the y axis in C. The resulting coordinate frame is denoted by C and is shown in Figure 3. It can be seen from the figure that the transformation from C to C is given by x θ x y y C θ C z z Figure 3: Pitch Angle. cos(θ 0 sin(θ R pitch (θ R 0 0. sin(θ 0 cos(θ The roll angle is defined as the rotation φ about the x axis in C. The resulting coordinate frame is the body frame, denoted by C b, and shown in Figure 4. It can be seen from the figure that the transformation from C to C is given by R roll (φ R b 0 0 0 cos(φ sin(φ. 0 sin(φ cos(φ Therefore, the complete transformation from the vehicle frame C v to the body frame C b is given by where p b R v b p v, R v b R roll (φr pitch (θr yaw (ψ cθcψ cθsψ sθ sφsθcψ cφsψ sφsθsψ + cφcψ sφcθ, cφsθcψ + sφsψ cφsθsψ sφcψ cφcθ

3 UAV MODEL x x b y φ y b C C b z φ z b Figure 4: Roll Angle. where cϕ cos(ϕ and sϕ sin(ϕ. UAV State Variables The state variables of the UAV are the following twelve quantities x the inertial position of the UAV along x I in C I, y the inertial position of the UAV along y I in C I, h the altitude of the aircraft measured along z v in C v, u the body frame velocity measured along x b in C b, v the body frame velocity measured along y b in C b, w the body frame velocity measured along z b in C b, φ the roll angle defined with respect to C, θ the pitch angle defined with respect to C, ψ the yaw angle defined with respect to C v, p the roll rate measured along x b in C b, q the pitch rate measured along y b in C b, r the yaw rate measured along z b in C b. The state variables are shown schematically in Figure 5. 3 UAV Model If we assume that the inertia matrix has the form J x 0 J xz J 0 J y 0, J xz 0 J z and that the aerodynamic moments are linear, then the rotational dynamics of the UAV are given by 3

3 UAV MODEL (θ, q (φ, p (x, u Roll Axis (y, v Pitch Axis (z, w (ψ, r Yaw Axis Figure 5: Definition of Axes ḣ u sin θ v sin φ cos θ w cos φ cos θ ( u rv qw g sin θ + ρv S C X0 + C Xα α + C Xq V + C X δ δ e e + ρs prop C prop (kδ t V ( v pw ru + g cos θ sin φ + ρv S bp C Y0 + C Yβ β + C Yp V + C br Y r V + C Y δ δ a a + C δ Yδ r r (3 ẇ qu pv + g cos θ cos φ + ρv S C Z0 + C Zα α + C Zq V + C Z δ δ e e (4 φ p + q sin φ tan θ + r cos φ tan θ (5 θ q cos φ r sin φ ψ q sin φ sec θ + r cos φ sec θ (7 ṗ Γ pq Γ qr + ρv S b bp C p0 + C pβ β + C pp V + C br p r V + C p δ δ a a + C δ pδ r r (8 q J xz (r p + J z J x pr + ρv cs C m0 + C mα α + C mq J y J y J y V + C m δ δ e e (9 ṙ Γ 3 pq Γ 4 qr + ρv S b bp C r0 + C rβ β + C rp V + C br r r V + C r δa δ a + C rδr δ r, (0 (6 4

4 LINEAR PITCH MODEL where Γ (J x J z J xz Γ J xz (J x J y + J z /Γ, Γ (J z (J z J y + J xz/γ Γ 3 ((J x J y J x + J xz/γ Γ 4 (J xz (J x J y + J z /Γ C p0 C pβ C pp C pr C pδ a C pδ r C r0 C rβ C rp C rr C rδ a C rδ r J z Γ C l 0 + J xz Γ C n 0 J z Γ C l β + J xz Γ C n β J z Γ C l p + J xz Γ C n p J z Γ C l r + J xz Γ C n r J z Γ C l δ a + J xz Γ C n δ a J z Γ C l + J xz δ r Γ C n δ r J xz Γ C l 0 + J x Γ C n 0 J xz Γ C l β + J x Γ C n β J xz Γ C l p + J x Γ C n p J xz Γ C l r + J x Γ C n r J xz Γ C l δ a + J x Γ C n δ a J xz Γ C l + J x δ r Γ C n. δ r 4 Linear Pitch Model In this section we will derive a linear equation for the evolution of the pitch angle θ. From Equation (6 we have θ q cos φ r sin φ q + q(cos φ r sin φ q + d θ, where d θ q(cos φ r sin φ. Differentiating we get θ q + d θ. 5

4 LINEAR PITCH MODEL Plugging in from Equation (9 and using the relationship θ α + γ, where γ is the flight path angle, we get θ J xz (r p + J z J x pr + ρv cs C m0 + C mα α + C mq J y J y J y V + C m δ δ e e + d θ J xz (r p + J z J x pr + ρv cs c C m0 + C mα (θ γ + C mq J y J y J y V ( θ d θ + C δ mδ e e ( ( c ρv cs + C mq J y V + J z J x J y pr + J y ρv cs a θ θ + aθ θ + a θ3 + d θ, θ + ρv csc mα J y c C m0 C mα γ C mq V d θ ( θ + ρv csc mδ e J y } + d θ δ e + { Jxz J y (r p + d θ where a θ, a θ, a θ3, and d θ have been appropriately defined. We have therefore derived a linear model for the evolution of the pitch angle. Taking the Laplace transform we have ( ( a θ3 θ(s s δ e (s + + a θ s + a θ s d θ (s + a θ s + a θ Note that in straight and level flight, r p φ γ 0 In addition, airframes are usually designed such that C m0 0, which implies that d θ 0. In general however, we have the equivalent block diagrams shown in Figures 6 and 7. Figure 6: Output disturbance form. Figure 7: Input disturbance form. 6

6 TRIM 5 Linear Roll Model In this section we will derive similar equations for roll. From Equation (5 we have Differentiating and using Equation (8 we get φ ṗ + d φ φ p + q sin φ tan θ + r cos φ tan θ p + d φ. Γ pq Γ qr + ρv S b bp C p0 + C pβ β + C pp V + C br p r V + C p δ δ a a + C δ pδ r r + d φ Γ pq Γ qr + ρv S b b C p0 + C pβ β + C pp V ( φ br d φ + C pr V + C p δa δ a + C pδr δ r ( ρv S b ( C b p p φ + V ρv S b C p δa δ a { + Γ pq Γ qr + ρv S b } b C p0 + C pβ β C pp V (d br φ + C pr V + C p δ δ r r + d φ a φ φ + aφ δ a + d φ. In the Laplace domain we have ( φ(s 6 Trim a φ s(s + a φ ( δ a (s + s(s + a φ d φ (s + d φ The notion of trim is an important topic in flight dynamics. The objective of this section is to briefly describe trim conditions. Suppose that we are given the nonlinear system described by the differential equations ẋ f(x, u, where f : R n R m R n, x is the state of the system and u is the input. The system is said to be in equilibrium at the state ˆx and input û if f(ˆx, û 0. When a UAV is in wings level steady flight, a subset of its states are in equilibrium. In the aerodynamics literature, an aircraft in equilibrium is said to be in trim. Trim is usually found about several flight conditions. The following four flight conditions are particularly useful.. Wings level flight. In wings level flight, airspeed is assumed to be constant. The wings are level but the flight path angle may not be zero. In other words, we allow for constant rate climbs and descents. Wings level flight is a pure longitudinal motion.. Constant altitude turn. In a constant altitude turn, the velocity is assumed constant and the altitude is held constant. To maintain constant altitude, both longitudinal and lateral controls are required. 3. Turn with a constant climb rate. This flight condition is a combination of wings-level flight and constant altitude turn maneuvers. Wings level flight and constant altitude turns are special cases of this flight condition. It is particularly useful for autonomous take-off and landing of mini-uavs. 4. Pull-up and push-down maneuvers. Pull-up and push-down maneuvers are not really equilibrium maneuvers in that f(ˆx, û 0 cannot be maintained indefinitely. Instead they may only be maintained for short periods of time. In pull-up and push-down maneuvers, airspeed is held constant, and the UAV travels a constant radius path in the longitudinal direction. The system equations given in ( (0 can be linearized around these trim conditions to obtain linear models for UAV flight. 7

7 LINEARIZATION 7 Linearization The UAV dynamics can be represented by the general nonlinear system of equations ẋ f(x, u, where x R is the state, u R 4 is the control vector, and f is given by Equations?? (??. Suppose that we have trimed the UAV with a trim input û and a trim state ˆx where ˆx f(ˆx, û. Letting x x ˆx we get x ẋ ˆx f(x, u f(ˆx, û f(x + ˆx ˆx, u + û û f(ˆx, û f(ˆx + x, û + ũ f(ˆx, û. Taking the Taylor series expansion of the first term about the trim state we get f(ˆx, û x f(ˆx, û + x + x f(ˆx, û x + x f(ˆx, û ũ + H.O.T f(ˆx, û Therefore, the linearized dynamics are determined by finding f f x and. 7. Longitudinal Dynamics f(ˆx, û ũ. ( The typical approach in the autopilot literature is to separate the dynamics into longitudinal and lateral modes. Longitudinal modes are the dynamics in the x-z plane and are described the state variables h, V, α, u, w, q, and θ. The lateral modes are the roll and pitch dynamics and are described by the state variables β, v, p, r, φ, and ψ. From Equations ( (0 we get u rv qw g sin θ + ρv S ẇ qu pv + g cos θ cos φ + ρv S q J xz (r p + J z J x pr + J y J y θ q cos φ r sin φ ḣ u sin θ v sin φ cos θ w cos φ cos θ. C X0 + C Xα α + C Xq V + C X δ e δ e C Z0 + C Zα α + C Zq + ρs prop C prop V + C Z δ δ e e ρv cs C m0 + C mα α + C mq J y V + C m δ δ e e (kδ t V The first step is to assume that all of the lateral states are zero, i.e., set φ p r β v 0 and substitute ( α tan w u V u + w 8

7. Lateral Dynamics 7 LINEARIZATION from Equation (?? to get u qw g sin θ + ρ(u + w S ( C X0 + C Xα tan w u + ρs prop C prop (kδ t (u + w ẇ qu + g cos θ cos φ + ρ(u + w S ( C Z0 + C Zα tan w u q ( ρ(u + w cs C m0 + C mα tan w J y u θ q ḣ u sin θ w cos θ. + C δ Xδ e e The next step is to linearize Equation?? according to Equation ( where Toward that end, note that f x f ( w tan u ( w w tan u δ e δ e δ e δ e δ e w w w w w δ t δ t δ t δ t δ t + w u + w u + C δ Zδ e e + ρ u + w S C Xq + ρ u + w S C Zq + C mδe δ e + J y ρ u + w csc mq q q q q q. ( u ( u θ θ θ θ θ h h h h h w u + w w V u u + w u V, where we have used Equation (?? and the fact that v 0. Working out the derivatives we get that the linearized state space equations are ũ X u X w X q g cos w ˆθ 0 ũ q Z u Z w Z q g sin ˆθ X δe X δt 0 w M u M w M q 0 0 q θ 0 0 0 0 θ + Z δe 0 ( M δe 0 δe 0 0 δ t, h sin ˆθ cos ˆθ 0 û cos ˆθ + ŵ sin ˆθ 0 h 0 0 where the coefficients are given in Table 7.. 7. Lateral Dynamics A similar approach can be followed for the lateral dynamics to obtain v Y v ˆv û g cos ˆθ v Y δa Y δr ṗ ṙ L v L p L r 0 p N v N p N r 0 r + L δa L δr N φ 0 tan ˆθ δa N δr 0 φ 0 0 ( δa δ r. 9

7.3 Coefficients from Aviones 8 TRANSFER FUNCTIONS Longitudinal X u X w X q X δe X δt Z u Z w Z q Z δe M u M w M q M δe ûρs m ˆq + ŵρs m C X0 + C Xα ˆα + C Xδ e C X0 + C Xα ˆα + C Xδ e ŵρs m Formula ˆδ e ρsŵc Xα ˆδ e + ρs cc Xq ŵˆq ˆV ŵ + ρ ˆV SC X q ĉ ρ ˆV SC Xδe ρs prop C X p kˆδ e m ˆq + ûρs m C Z0 + C Zα ˆα + C Zδ e C Z0 + C Zα ˆα + C Zδ e ûρs c J y û + ρ ˆV SC Z q c ρ ˆV SC Zδe C m0 + C mα ˆα + C mδe ˆδe + ρs cc Xq ûˆq ˆV ˆδ e ρsc Zα ŵ ˆδ e + ρsc Zα û ρs ccm α ŵ J y ŵρs c J y C m0 + C mα ˆα + C mδe ˆδe + ρs ccm α û J y ρ ˆV S c C m q J y ρ ˆV S cc mδe J y + ρs ˆV C X α û ρspropcpropû m + ûρsc Zq cˆq ˆV m + ρŵs cc Zq ˆq m ˆV + ρs c C mq ˆqû J y ˆV + ρs c C m q ˆqŵ J y ˆV ρs propc prop ŵ Table : Longitudinal Coefficients State Space Models. 7.3 Coefficients from Aviones The linearized equations around level flight for the UAV model in Aviones, are given by ũ 0.3356.38.976 9.68 0 ũ 0.7436 6.878 w q.96 3.9003 9.85.895 0 w 0.700 3.5735.390 0 0 q θ 0 0.0000 0 0 θ + 3.7855 0 ( δe 47.970 0, 0 0 δ t h 0.98 0.98 0 0.0000 0 h 0 0 0.88 v.050.976 9.85 9.67 β ṗ ṙ.3.955.0096 0 p.755 0.099.798 0 r + 8.3479 0.8560 4.400.7 0 0 φ 0.0000 0.964 0.0000 φ 0 0 8 Transfer Functions Transfer function models can be extracted from the state-space models using the Matlab sstf command. For example the transfer function from δ e to u can be obtained using the following commands: >> num,den sstf(a_lon, B_lon,,0,0,0,0, 0,0, >> H_u_elevator zpk(minreal(tf(num,den. Using this method we the following transfer function: H u,δt 6.878(s 0.08383(s + 5.38s + 80.79 (s + 0.4543s + 0.8368(s + 5.7s + 79.8, ( δa δ r. 0

8 TRANSFER FUNCTIONS H u,δe 0.74363(s + 3.(s +.684s + 8.9 (s + 0.4543s + 0.8368(s + 5.7s + 79.8, H w,δe 3.7855(s + 35.8(s + 0.3845s +.06 (s + 0.4543s + 0.8368(s + 5.7s + 79.8, H q,δe H θ,δe H v,δa 47.97s(s + 3.038(s + 0.905 (s + 0.4543s + 0.8368(s + 5.7s + 79.8, 47.6(s + 3.038(s + 0.905 (s + 0.4543s + 0.8368(s + 5.7s + 79.8, 5.536(s 3.59(s +.4 (s +.6(s 0.0570(s +.58s +, H p,δa 8.3479(s 0.709(s + 3.454s + 5.95 (s +.6(s 0.0570(s +.58s +, H r,δa 4.4(s + 3.548(s 0.40s +.53 (s +.6(s 0.0570(s +.58s +, H φ,δa 9.808(s + 3.7s + 4.07 (s +.6(s 0.0570(s +.58s +.