Evergreen Packaging, Inc. Waste Management Plan

Evergreen Packaging, Inc. Waste Management Plan June 29, 2012

Waste Management Plan Prepared for: Evergreen Packaging, Inc. Pine Bluff Mill 5201 Fairfield Road Pine Bluff, AR 71601 Prepared by: GBM c & Associates 219 Brown Lane Bryant, AR 72022 June 29, 2012

CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 WASTE GENERATING PROCESS AND ANNUAL PRODUCTION... 3 3.0 WASTE STORAGE PRACTICES... 3 4.0 WASTE TRANSPORTATION AND APPLICATION METHODS... 4 5.0 SLUDGE CHARACTERISTICS... 8 6.0 LOCATION MAPS... 10 7.0 SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN... 10 7.1 Waste Application Rate Calculations... 11 7.2 Soil Analysis... 12 7.3 Application Area Map Information... 15 FIGURES Figure 1. Schematic diagram of wastewater treatment.... 2 Figure 2. Topographic View of Evergreen Facility.... 5 Figure 3. Aerial View of Evergreen facility.... 6 Figure 4. Six application fields (Fields A-F) utilized by Evergreen.... 7 Figure 5. Flood Insurance Map.... 14 TABLES Table 1. Sludge storage practices and location.... 4 Table 2. Sludge Waste Analytical Data Average concentration values of Evergreen s sludge sources from 2008 to 2011.... 9 Table 3. Sludge Analysis - Total plant available nitrogen (PAN), dry basis.... 10 Table 4. Calculated sludge application rates.... 11 Table 5. Total acres required per sludge product... 12 Table 6. Average soil characteristics for fields A, D, and E... 13 June 29, 2012 i

APPENDICES Appendix A Arkansas Permit No. 4579-WR-4 Appendix B Land Application Soil Information Appendix C Soil and Waste Analysis Summary (2008-2011) Appendix D Historical Analytical Data (2008-2011) June 29, 2012 ii

1.0 INTRODUCTION Evergreen Packaging, Inc (Evergreen) in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, manufactures coated publication and food grade paper products and is currently permitted (State Permit No. 4579- WR-4) to operate and maintain a waste disposal system for the land application of sludge wastes and process water. A copy of this permit is located in Appendix A. The sludge waste land applied include; Ash Pond Solids, Lime Mud Solids, Main Ditch Sludge, Aeration Basin Spoils, Green Liquor Dreg/Ash (50:50 mixture), and Brownstock Pulping Knots. Other sludge sources are generated by the Evergreen manufacturing process and may include unclaimed raw materials, byproducts, and waste material typically associated with the production of paper. Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the wastewater treatment. The sludge management plan (Plan) covers the land application of the sludge waste, manufacturing byproducts. The Plan also documents the characteristics of the applied sludge, soil characteristics of the land application sites, and methods utilized in the application process. Evergreen s waste disposal system is operated and maintained in accordance with this Plan. June 29, 2012 1

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of wastewater treatment. June 29, 2012 2

2.0 WASTE GENERATING PROCESS AND ANNUAL PRODUCTION Sludge from the facility is generated from two sources: 1) the wastewater treatment system, and 2) the manufacturing process. The sludges generated from the wastewater treatment system are solids dredged from the ASB and the Main Ditch. Other sludge sources may include unclaimed raw materials, byproducts, and waste material. Annual sludge production quantities are recorded by Evergreen on monthly summary land application spreadsheets. Since 2008, Evergreen has averaged approximately 91,260 cubic yards/year land applied. Sources applied since 2008 have included a mixture of Green Liquor Dreg (GLD) and Ash, ASB Spoils, Ash Pond, and Lime Mud. Recent sludge application volumes are as follows: 2008: 91,660 cubic yards with an average consistency of 30% solids, was land applied. 2009: 99,016 cubic yards with an average consistency of 32% solids, was land applied. 2010: 83,100 cubic yards with an average consistency of 55% solids, was land applied. Evergreen s permit was modified in August 2006 to include process wastewater; however, process wastewater has not been land applied since its permit date. The permit renewal in 2011-12 removed the inclusion of process wastewater land application. 3.0 WASTE STORAGE PRACTICES Table 1 below explains the storage practices and locations of sludge waste generated at the Evergreen facility. June 29, 2012 3

Table 1. Sludge storage practices and location. Ash Source Lime Mud Main Ditch ASB Spoils Green Liquor Dreg (GLD) Knots Storage Practice and Location Typically stored in one of 2 concrete lined ponds located west of the Main Ditch (Ash Ponds). Excess water decanted and returned to Main Ditch. Typically stored in one of 2 concrete lined ponds located west of the Main Ditch (Ash Ponds). Excess water decanted and returned to Main Ditch. Stockpiled along both sides of the Main Ditch. Stockpiled within Mill Facility. Typically stored on either a concrete pad surrounding the lined ponds or in a section of the ponds. Stored on the solid waste fuel pad. 4.0 WASTE TRANSPORTATION AND APPLICATION METHODS Evergreen is permitted to land apply sludge to six areas surrounding the facility. Figures 2 through 4 provide topographic and aerial views of the Evergreen facility location and show the locations of the six application fields (Fields A-F). An independent farmer under Evergreen s guidance farms the land application areas. The individual sludge sources are not combined prior to land application. The sludges are loaded in a dump truck or spreader equipment at their respective storage locations and moved directly to the land application areas. During transfer, none of the sludge is carried over public roads or on property that does not belong to Evergreen. Spreading equipment at the application areas distributes the sludge as evenly as possible. As stated in Section 2.0, each sludge source has a relatively high percent solid, minimizing runoff potential. However, runoff from the application of sludge is contained through the use of berms constructed during the application process. Berms are constructed so that runoff is not allowed to leave the application area. Each field is isolated by the installation of a perimeter berm. A minimum fifty-foot buffer zone is maintained between land application areas and land not owned by Evergreen. A one hundred-foot buffer is maintained between application areas and any creek or ponding water. Sludge is not applied during periods of standing water or during a time when rainfall is occurring or expected. After the sludge and soil has dried, the land is disked to mix the sludge and soil. June 29, 2012 4

Figure 2. Topographic View of Evergreen Facility. June 29, 2012 5

Figure 3. Aerial View of Evergreen facility. June 29, 2012 6

Figure 4. Six application fields (Fields A-F) utilized by Evergreen. June 29, 2012 7

5.0 SLUDGE CHARACTERISTICS Table 2 shows a tabulation of the six existing sources that is to be land applied and the average concentration values of analyzed parameters from 2008 to 2011. The laboratory data sheets that were used to compile this data have been included in Appendix D of the application. Table 3 provides an estimate of the total sludge PAN based on the data provided in Table 2. These calculations were derived from equations provided in the Guidelines for Land Application of Municipal Sewage Sludge. In accordance with Permit 4579-WR-4 all sludge results are summarized and submitted to ADEQ as part of the annual report. Sludge metals analysis results are evaluated annually for ceiling concentrations and cumulative loading. A comparison is made of the metals concentrations with the ceiling concentrations listed in Table 1 of 40 CFR 503.13 as required by Permit No. 4579-WR-4. Additionally, metals are evaluated along with previously land applied sludge analysis results to estimate whether cumulative loading rates are exceeded as required by Permit No. 4579-WR-4. Should it be determined that either ceiling concentrations or cumulative loading rates are exceeded, land application for the acreage in question will cease. In addition to the parameters listed in Table 2, Evergreen monitors dioxin from the primary clarifier sludge for 2,3,7,8 TCDD. Results of dioxin analysis are summarized and submitted to ADEQ as part of the annual reporting requirements of permit 4579-WR-4. June 29, 2012 8

Table 2. Sludge Waste Analytical Data Average concentration values of Evergreen s sludge sources from 2008 to 2011. Parameters Ash Pond Dry Weight Basis Lime Mud Dry Weight Basis Main Ditch Dry Weight Basis ASB Spoils Dry Weight Basis 50:50 GLD/Ash Dry Weight Basis Press Sludge Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg -- -- -- 2.3 2.4 -- Cadmium, mg/kg -- -- -- 1.1 4.4 -- Chromium mg/kg 7.5 2.3 11.6 15.8 15.1 3.4 Copper, mg/kg 38.8 1.6 30.2 45.9 155 4.3 Lead, mg/kg -- -- -- 13.3 15.7 -- Mercury, mg/kg 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.0 0.04 Molybdenum, mg/kg -- -- -- 0.3 0.3 -- Nickel, mg/kg 11.2 3.6 19.0 6.8 61.2 4.2 Zinc, mg/kg 211 1340 52.5 154 336 10.3 Selenium, mg/kg -- -- -- 2.7 2.8 -- TKN, mg/kg 224 173 713 779 316 236 Phosphorus, mg/kg 1085 1084 958 1010 1034 136 Potassium, mg/kg 3171 170 1301 1196 3532 357 Nitrate-N, mg/kg 27 31.5 67.9 117 41 68.6 Ammonia-N, mg/kg 29 32.8 38.3 117 37 26.6 % Solids 33.5 66.1 45.7 40.9 33.9 36.2 % Volatile Solids 24.6 40.9 19.0 37.9 22.6 76.2 ph (su) 9.8 10.8 7.2 7.6 11.8 9.4 PCB's mg/kg -- -- -- 0.26 0.29 -- * Where values were less than the Detection Limit (DL), ½ the detection value was used for calculations. June 29, 2012 9

Table 3. Sludge Analysis - Total plant available nitrogen (PAN), dry basis. Source TKN mg/l Ammonia Nitrogen Total (mg/l) Available (mg/l) Organic Nitrogen Total (mg/l) Available (mg/l) Available Nitrate Nitrogen (mg/l) Total PAN* (lb/mm Gal) Ash Pond 224 28.8 14.4 195 58.6 26.8 0.20 Lime Mud 173 32.8 16.4 141 42.2 31.5 0.18 Main Ditch 713 38.3 19.1 675 202 67.9 0.58 ASB Spoils 779 117 58.5 662 199 117 0.75 GLD/Ash 316 36.5 18.3 280 83.9 41.3 0.29 Press Sludge 236 26.6 13.3 209 62.8 68.6 0.29 * PAN = ((0.3 x (TKN - Ammonia)) + (0.5 x Ammonia N) + Nitrite N + Nitrate N)/500. 6.0 LOCATION MAPS A USGS 7.5 minute series topographic map of the Ladd quadrangle and an aerial map of the facility are provided as Figure 2 and Figure 3. The maps display information such as the facility location, approximate facility boundary, adjacent land use, and nearby receiving streams. Figures 3 and 4 also depict application area information such as legal descriptions, field locations, and boundaries. 7.0 SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN The following sections discuss Evergreen s site management for each sludge waste and application areas. Site management information includes soil characteristics of the applied fields, waste application rates, suitable crops for planting, crop requirements, and total acres required for applications. Land application area information is also included in Section 7.3. In addition, sludge loadings are limited in the permit by the following: 1) plant available nitrogen (PAN) of the sludge, which cannot exceed the expected nitrogen uptake of the proposed crop that will be planted, 2) ceiling concentration limits for metals, and 3) cumulative loading rates for metals. June 29, 2012 10

7.1 Waste Application Rate Calculations Several crops are suitable for use in Evergreen s land application areas. Each potential crop was evaluated for sludge application rates using nutrient uptake information (crop nitrogen requirement, CNR) from Table 4-11 of the Process Design Manual for Land Treatment of Municipal Wastewater, USEPA, October 1981. Table 4 shows a tabulation of the resulting sludge application rates and the amount of acreage necessary for the various crops based on the PAN calculated in Table 3. Table 5 shows the total acres required for potential crops. These calculations are derived from averaged sludge waste percent solids and average tons applied of each sludge waste from 2008 to 2011. Evergreen may elect to apply sludge to fields on a rotating basis. During any non-farm years, natural grasses will be allowed to grow on the soil that is not receiving sludge. Since sludge will not be applied during years the fields are not farmed, the uptake of natural grasses has not been considered in the nutrient uptake calculations for determining acreage requirements. Table 4. Calculated sludge application rates. Crop Crop Nitrogen Requirement (lb/ac-yr) Sludge Application Rate (tons/acre-year) = Crop Nitrogen Requirement (CNR) in (lb/yr) divided by Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) in (lbs/ton of sludge) 50:50 Ash Lime Mud Main Ditch ASB Spoils Press Sludge GLD/Ash Cotton 100 502 555 173 134 349 346 Bermuda Grass 300 1,505 1,665 518 401 1,046 1,037 Soybeans 223 1,118 1,238 385 298 778 771 Sorghum 120 602 666 207 161 419 415 Ryegrass 178 893 988 308 238 621 615 Fescue 134 672 744 232 179 467 463 Corn 156 782 866 270 209 544 539 Wheat 143 717 794 247 191 499 494 June 29, 2012 11

Table 5. Total acres required per sludge product Crop Ash Lime Mud Main Ditch 2,009 Dry Tons/Year Sludge Application Rate 3,962 Dry Tons/Year Sludge Application Rate 2,551 Dry Tons/Year Sludge Application Rate ASB Spoils 3,320 Dry Tons/Year Sludge Application Rate 50:50 GLD/Ash 15,746 Dry Tons/Year Sludge Application Rate Acres Required (Existing Sources) Cotton 4.0 7.1 14.8 24.8 45.1 95.9 Bermuda Grass 1.3 2.4 4.9 8.3 15.0 32.0 Soybeans 1.8 3.2 6.6 11.1 20.2 43.0 Sorghum 3.3 5.9 12.3 20.7 37.6 79.9 Ryegrass 2.3 4.0 8.3 13.9 25.4 53.9 Fescue 3.0 5.3 11.0 18.5 33.7 71.5 Corn 2.6 4.6 9.5 15.9 28.9 61.4 Wheat 2.8 5.0 10.3 17.4 31.6 67.0 * Press Sludge has not been Land Applied. 7.2 Soil Analysis In accordance with Permit 4579-WR-4 all soil results are summarized and submitted to ADEQ as part of the annual report. Table 6 shows the averaged results of the soils analysis from samples collected from 2008 to 2011 for fields A, D, and E. The remaining fields (B, C, and F) have not been applied to over the past five years and soil data is not available. Soil samples are taken from several locations across a land application field. These soil samples are then mixed and composited to make a single sample for each 25-30 acre area. The portion of field E located south of the railroad track is not being utilized due to its position in the 100-year flood plain. The remaining five fields contain approximately 459 acres with about 85% (390 acres) of this amount being available for sludge waste application. Current land application areas are located outside the 100-year flood plain according to the Flood Insurance maps (Figure 5) for this area (FEMA Community Panel Number 05069C0325D dated March 16, 2009). June 29, 2012 12

Table 6. Average soil characteristics for fields A, D, and E. Parameters Field A Field D Field E Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg 2.2 2.2 2.5 Cadmium, mg/kg 0.55 0.93 1.0 Chromium mg/kg 5.9 9.3 9.0 Copper, mg/kg 11.9 11.0 20.7 Lead, mg/kg 4.2 6.2 8.8 Mercury, mg/kg <0.1 0.10 0.1 Molybdenum, mg/kg 0.3 0.31 0.3 Nickel, mg/kg 6.6 6.8 11.8 Nitrate as N, mg/kg 65.9 64.0 64.5 Phosphorus, mg/kg 501.5 577 519.5 Potassium, mg/kg 1160 1238 1552 Selenium, mg/kg 2.8 2.83 2.7 Sodium mg/kg 1.0 0.51 0.6 Zinc, mg/kg 36.2 48.0 74.9 CEC, mg-eq/100g 10.0 10.20 12.7 Specific Conductance (µs/cm) 1900 243 1387 ph (su) 9.7 8.7 9.5 June 29, 2012 13

Figure 5. Flood Insurance Map. June 29, 2012 14

7.3 Application Area Map Information Figure 3 and Figure 4 depict fields A, B, C, D, E, and F locations, boundaries, and legal descriptions. All land application sites are located in Jefferson County. Dominant surrounding land use consists of pasture and crop land. The Arkansas River is the nearest receiving stream. The Arkansas River levee system borders the facility to the northwest. State highway 63 borders the facility to the west and Fairfield Road borders the facility to the south. Pine Bluff, Arkansas is the nearest community and is located approximately 3.5 miles west of the facility. Soil series boundaries, soil map unit names, and soil ratings are for the application areas are provided in the Web Soil Survey figures provided in Appendix B. June 29, 2012 15

Appendix A Arkansas Permit No. 4579-WR-4

Appendix B Land Application Soil Information

Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field A) 34 14' 21'' 34 14' 7'' 3788810 3788880 3788950 3789020 3789090 3789160 3789230 91 54' 28'' 91 54' 28'' 600580 600580 600650 600650 600720 600720 600790 600790 Map Scale: 1:3,160 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet. 600860 600860 Meters 0 40 80 160 240 0 150 300 600 900 36 Feet 600930 600930 601000 601000 601070 601070 601140 601140 24 601210 601210 91 54' 2'' 91 54' 2'' 3788810 3788880 3788950 3789020 3789090 3789160 3789230 34 14' 21'' 34 14' 7'' Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/28/2011 Page 1 of 3

Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field A) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Ratings Political Features Area of Interest (AOI) Soil Map Units Oklared fine sandy loam, occasionally flooded Roxana silt loam, occasionally flooded Not rated or not available Cities Water Features Transportation Streams and Canals Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads MAP INFORMATION Map Scale: 1:3,160 if printed on A size (8.5" 11") sheet. The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: UTM Zone 15N NAD83 This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Survey Area Data: Version 8, Dec 2, 2008 Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Data not available. The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/28/2011 Page 2 of 3

Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Evergreen Packaging Field A Map Unit Name Map Unit Name Summary by Map Unit Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (AR660) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 24 Oklared fine sandy loam, occasionally flooded 36 Roxana silt loam, occasionally flooded Oklared fine sandy loam, occasionally flooded Roxana silt loam, occasionally flooded 0.0 0.0% 35.7 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 35.7 100.0% Description A soil map unit is a collection of soil areas or nonsoil areas (miscellaneous areas) delineated in a soil survey. Each map unit is given a name that uniquely identifies the unit in a particular soil survey area. Rating Options Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary Tie-break Rule: Lower Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/28/2011 Page 3 of 3

Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field B) 34 14' 49'' 34 14' 26'' 3789360 3789440 3789520 3789600 3789680 3789760 3789840 3789920 3790000 91 55' 57'' 91 55' 57'' 598320 598320 51 598400 598400 30 598480 598480 Map Scale: 1:3,420 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet. 598560 8 598560 Meters 0 30 60 120 180 Feet 0 100 200 400 600 598640 63 598640 22 35 598720 598720 598800 598800 91 55' 36'' 91 55' 36'' 3789360 3789440 3789520 3789600 3789680 3789760 3789840 3789920 3790000 34 14' 49'' 34 14' 25'' Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 1 of 3

Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field B) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Units Soil Ratings Coushatta silt loam McGehee silt loam Portland clay Roxana silt loam Yorktown silty clay Not rated or not available Political Features Cities Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads MAP INFORMATION Map Scale: 1:3,420 if printed on A size (8.5" 11") sheet. The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: UTM Zone 15N NAD83 This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Survey Area Data: Version 8, Dec 2, 2008 Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Data not available. The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Local Roads Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 2 of 3

Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Evergreen Packaging Field B Map Unit Name Map Unit Name Summary by Map Unit Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (AR660) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 8 Coushatta silt loam Coushatta silt loam 19.9 44.9% 22 McGehee silt loam McGehee silt loam 9.0 20.4% 30 Portland clay Portland clay 13.6 30.7% 35 Roxana silt loam Roxana silt loam 1.7 3.9% 51 Yorktown silty clay Yorktown silty clay 0.1 0.1% Totals for Area of Interest 44.3 100.0% Description A soil map unit is a collection of soil areas or nonsoil areas (miscellaneous areas) delineated in a soil survey. Each map unit is given a name that uniquely identifies the unit in a particular soil survey area. Rating Options Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary Tie-break Rule: Lower Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 3 of 3

Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field C) 34 13' 37'' 34 13' 8'' 3787000 3787100 3787200 3787300 3787400 3787500 3787600 3787700 3787800 91 55' 51'' 91 55' 50'' 598500 598500 598600 598600 598700 19 Okeefe Rd 598700 598800 598800 33 598900 598900 Map Scale: 1:6,440 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet. Meters 0 50 100 200 300 599000 599000 599100 599100 599200 Paper Mill Rd 35 599200 0 350 700 1,400 2,100 Feet 599300 599300 599400 599400 599500 33 599500 599600 Fairfield Rd 599600 599700 599700 599800 599800 91 54' 57'' 91 54' 58'' 3787000 3787100 3787200 3787300 3787400 3787500 3787600 3787700 3787800 34 13' 36'' 34 13' 7'' Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 1 of 3

Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field C) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Ratings Political Features Area of Interest (AOI) Soil Map Units Hebert silt loam Rilla silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Roxana silt loam Not rated or not available Cities Water Features Transportation Streams and Canals Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads MAP INFORMATION Map Scale: 1:6,440 if printed on A size (8.5" 11") sheet. The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: UTM Zone 15N NAD83 This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Survey Area Data: Version 8, Dec 2, 2008 Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Data not available. The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 2 of 3

Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Evergreen Packaging Field C Map Unit Name Map Unit Name Summary by Map Unit Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (AR660) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 19 Hebert silt loam Hebert silt loam 10.5 18.0% 33 Rilla silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Rilla silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 17.4 30.0% 35 Roxana silt loam Roxana silt loam 30.2 52.0% Totals for Area of Interest 58.0 100.0% Description A soil map unit is a collection of soil areas or nonsoil areas (miscellaneous areas) delineated in a soil survey. Each map unit is given a name that uniquely identifies the unit in a particular soil survey area. Rating Options Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary Tie-break Rule: Lower Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 3 of 3

Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field D) 34 14' 9'' 34 13' 22'' 3787400 3787600 3787800 3788000 3788200 3788400 3788600 3788800 91 56' 18'' 91 56' 18'' 597800 Paper Mill Rd 597800 598000 598000 63 598200 598200 26 30 8 19 598400 598400 Map Scale: 1:10,300 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet. 19 598600 Paper Mill Rd 598600 Meters 0 100 200 400 600 35 Andrews Rd Okeefe Rd 598800 598800 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet 599000 599000 599200 599200 599400 599400 599600 599600 599800 599800 91 54' 54'' 91 54' 53'' 3787400 3787600 3787800 3788000 3788200 3788400 3788600 3788800 34 14' 8'' 34 13' 21'' Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 1 of 3

Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field D) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Units Soil Ratings Coushatta silt loam Hebert silt loam Perry clay Portland clay Roxana silt loam Not rated or not available Political Features Cities Water Features Streams and Canals MAP INFORMATION Map Scale: 1:10,300 if printed on A size (8.5" 11") sheet. The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: UTM Zone 15N NAD83 This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Survey Area Data: Version 8, Dec 2, 2008 Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Data not available. The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 2 of 3

Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Evergreen Packaging Field D Map Unit Name Map Unit Name Summary by Map Unit Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (AR660) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 8 Coushatta silt loam Coushatta silt loam 1.7 1.2% 19 Hebert silt loam Hebert silt loam 38.9 28.9% 26 Perry clay Perry clay 0.7 0.5% 30 Portland clay Portland clay 6.4 4.8% 35 Roxana silt loam Roxana silt loam 86.8 64.6% Totals for Area of Interest 134.5 100.0% Description A soil map unit is a collection of soil areas or nonsoil areas (miscellaneous areas) delineated in a soil survey. Each map unit is given a name that uniquely identifies the unit in a particular soil survey area. Rating Options Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary Tie-break Rule: Lower Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 3 of 3

Celia Rd Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field E) 34 13' 20'' 34 12' 48'' 3786400 3786500 3786600 3786700 3786800 3786900 3787000 3787100 3787200 3787300 91 54' 10'' 91 54' 10'' 601100 601100 601200 601200 601300 601300 35 601400 Fairfield Rd 601400 Map Scale: 1:4,770 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet. Meters 0 45 90 180 270 Feet 0 150 300 600 900 601500 30 601500 601600 33 33 601600 49 601700 601700 91 53' 41'' 91 53' 41'' 3786400 3786500 3786600 3786700 3786800 3786900 3787000 3787100 3787200 3787300 34 13' 20'' 34 12' 47'' Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/28/2011 Page 1 of 3

Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field E) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Ratings Political Features Area of Interest (AOI) Soil Map Units Portland clay Rilla silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Roxana silt loam Wabbaseka-Latanier complex, undulating Not rated or not available Cities Water Features Transportation Streams and Canals Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads MAP INFORMATION Map Scale: 1:4,770 if printed on A size (8.5" 11") sheet. The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: UTM Zone 15N NAD83 This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Survey Area Data: Version 8, Dec 2, 2008 Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Data not available. The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Local Roads Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/28/2011 Page 2 of 3

Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Evergreen Packaging Field E Map Unit Name Map Unit Name Summary by Map Unit Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (AR660) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 30 Portland clay Portland clay 7.6 9.6% 33 Rilla silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Rilla silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 23.5 29.6% 35 Roxana silt loam Roxana silt loam 42.2 53.1% 49 Wabbaseka-Latanier complex, undulating Wabbaseka-Latanier complex, undulating 6.1 7.7% Totals for Area of Interest 79.4 100.0% Description A soil map unit is a collection of soil areas or nonsoil areas (miscellaneous areas) delineated in a soil survey. Each map unit is given a name that uniquely identifies the unit in a particular soil survey area. Rating Options Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary Tie-break Rule: Lower Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/28/2011 Page 3 of 3

Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field F) 34 13' 56'' 34 13' 32'' 3787800 3787900 3788000 3788100 3788200 3788300 3788400 91 55' 22'' 91 55' 22'' Paper Mill Rd 599300 599300 52 8 599400 599400 599500 599500 Map Scale: 1:5,260 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet. 35 599600 52 599600 Meters 0 50 100 200 300 599700 599700 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 599800 599800 Feet 599900 599900 600000 600000 52 600100 600100 600200 600200 91 54' 38'' 600300 600300 91 54' 39'' 3788400 3788300 3788200 3788100 3788000 3787900 3787800 34 13' 56'' 34 13' 32'' Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 1 of 3

Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (Evergreen Packaging Field F) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Units Soil Ratings Coushatta silt loam Roxana silt loam Water Not rated or not available Political Features Cities Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads MAP INFORMATION Map Scale: 1:5,260 if printed on A size (8.5" 11") sheet. The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: UTM Zone 15N NAD83 This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Survey Area Data: Version 8, Dec 2, 2008 Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Data not available. The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 2 of 3

Map Unit Name Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas Evergreen Packaging Field F Map Unit Name Map Unit Name Summary by Map Unit Jefferson and Lincoln Counties, Arkansas (AR660) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 8 Coushatta silt loam Coushatta silt loam 16.4 52.2% 35 Roxana silt loam Roxana silt loam 13.3 42.5% 52 Water Water 1.7 5.3% Totals for Area of Interest 31.3 100.0% Description A soil map unit is a collection of soil areas or nonsoil areas (miscellaneous areas) delineated in a soil survey. Each map unit is given a name that uniquely identifies the unit in a particular soil survey area. Rating Options Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary Tie-break Rule: Lower Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/14/2011 Page 3 of 3

Appendix C Soil and Waste Analysis Summary (2008-2010)

2008-2011 Average Soil Characteristics for Fields A-F Parameter Concentration (mg/kg) Concentration (lb/ton) Fields A (44 acres) Arsenic, mg/kg 2.15 0.0043 Cadmium, mg/kg 0.55 0.0011 Chromium mg/kg 5.93 0.012 Copper, mg/kg 11.88 0.024 Lead, mg/kg 4.23 0.0085 Mercury, mg/kg < 0.10 < 0.0002 Molybdenum, mg/kg 0.25 0.0005 Nickel, mg/kg 6.58 0.013 Nitrate-N, mg/kg 65.94 0.132 Phosphorus, mg/kg 501.50 1.003 Potassium, mg/kg 1,160.25 2.32 Selenium, mg/kg 2.83 0.0057 Sodium mg/kg 0.53 0.00 Zinc, mg/kg 36.18 0.072 CEC, mg-eq/100g 9.98 -- Specific Conductance (µs/cm) 1,900.00 -- ph (su) 9.65 -- Fields D (118 acres) Arsenic, mg/kg 2.23 0.0045 Cadmium, mg/kg 0.93 0.0019 Chromium mg/kg 9.28 0.019 Copper, mg/kg 11.03 0.022 Lead, mg/kg 6.23 0.0125 Mercury, mg/kg < 0.10 < 0.0002 Molybdenum, mg/kg 0.31 0.0006 Nickel, mg/kg 6.78 0.014 Nitrate-N, mg/kg 63.95 0.128 Phosphorus, mg/kg 576.25 1.153 Potassium, mg/kg 1,237.75 2.48 Selenium, mg/kg 2.83 0.0057 Sodium mg/kg 0.51 0.00 Zinc, mg/kg 47.98 0.096 CEC, mg-eq/100g 10.20 -- Specific Conductance (µs/cm) 243.33 -- ph (su) 8.68 -- Fields E (64 acres) Arsenic, mg/kg 2.5 0.0049 Cadmium, mg/kg 1.0 0.0020 Chromium mg/kg 9.0 0.018 Copper, mg/kg 20.7 0.041 Lead, mg/kg 8.8 0.0176 Mercury, mg/kg 0.1 < 0.0002 Molybdenum, mg/kg 0.3 0.0006 Nickel, mg/kg 11.8 0.024 Nitrate-N, mg/kg 64.5 0.129 Phosphorus, mg/kg 519.5 1.039 Potassium, mg/kg 1552.0 3.10 Selenium, mg/kg 2.7 0.0054 Sodium mg/kg 0.6 0.00 Zinc, mg/kg 74.9 0.150 CEC, mg-eq/100g 12.7 -- Specific Conductance (µs/cm) 1386.7 -- ph (su) 9.5 --

Evergreen Packaging Inc 2008 - Field Data Summary (Soils) Parameter Field A Field B Field C Field D Field E Field F Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg 1.1 Did not apply 1.4 2.3 Cadmium, mg/kg 0.80 1.6 1.20 Chromium mg/kg 3.00 4.4 3.4 Copper, mg/kg 4.6 4.5 9.1 Lead, mg/kg 7.9 9.8 14.4 Mercury, mg/kg <0.05 0.03 <0.05 0.03 <0.05 0.03 Molybdenum, mg/kg <0.1 0.05 <0.1 0.05 <0.1 0.05 Nickel, mg/kg 3.3 3.9 6.2 *Nitrate as N, mg/kg 240.0 254.0 245.0 Phosphorus, mg/kg 226.0 275.0 228.0 Potassium, mg/kg 641.0 751.0 808.0 Selenium, mg/kg 0.80 0.80 0.30 Sodium, mmhos/cm 0.53 0.51 0.58 Zinc, mg/kg 3.7 4.9 4.7 CEC, mg-eq/100g 19.0 17.0 24.0 % Solids Specific Conductance (µs/cm) ph (su) 8.3 7.9 8.5 *reported as Nitrates Did not apply 2009 - Field Data Summary (Soils) Parameter Field A Field B Field C Field D Field E Field F Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg <5 2.5 Did not apply <5 2.5 <5 2.5 Did not apply Cadmium, mg/kg <0.4 0.20 <0.4 0.2 <0.4 0.2 Chromium mg/kg 7.20 7.3 11.0 Copper, mg/kg 3.9 3.5 6.9 Lead, mg/kg <4 2.0 <4 2.0 4.1 Mercury, mg/kg <0.1 0.05 <0.1 0.05 <0.1 0.05 Molybdenum, mg/kg <0.8 0.4 <0.8 0.4 <0.8 0.4 Nickel, mg/kg 5.2 5.0 7.6 Nitrate as N, mg/kg 15.0 1.3 4.9 Phosphorus, mg/kg 360.0 330.0 440.0 Potassium, mg/kg 1400.0 1200.0 1800.0 Selenium, mg/kg <7 3.50 <7 3.50 <7 3.50 Sodium, mmhos/cm -- -- -- Zinc, mg/kg 21.0 19.0 35.0 CEC, mg-eq/100g 4.2 4.0 7.6 % Solids -- -- -- Specific Conductance (µs/cm) 1800 130 860 ph (su) 10.3 8.4 9.2

2010 - Field Data Summary (Soils) Parameter Field A Field B Field C Field D Field E Field F Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg <5 2.5 Did not apply <5 2.5 <5 2.5 Did not apply Cadmium, mg/kg <0.4 0.2 <0.4 0.4 <0.4 0.4 Chromium mg/kg 6.6 6.4 7.5 Copper, mg/kg 13 5.1 5.9 Lead, mg/kg 5 4.7 6.7 Mercury, mg/kg <0.1 0.05 <0.1 0.05 <0.1 0.05 Molybdenum, mg/kg <0.8 0.4 <0.8 0.4 <0.8 0.4 Nickel, mg/kg 5.8 5.2 6.2 Nitrate as N, mg/kg 8.5 <0.5 0.25 4.3 Phosphorus, mg/kg 420 400 430 Potassium, mg/kg 1500 1200 1200 Selenium, mg/kg <7 3.50 <7 3.50 <7 3.50 Zinc, mg/kg 26 18 30 CEC, mg-eq/100g 5.7 5.8 7.3 ph 10 9.5 10.2 Specific Conductance (µs/cm) 1800 280 1500 2011 - Field Data Summary (Soils) Parameter Field A Field B Field C Field D Field E Field F Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg < 5 2.5 Did not apply < 5 2.5 < 5 2.5 Did not apply Cadmium, mg/kg 1 1.5 2.2 Chromium mg/kg 6.9 19 14 Copper, mg/kg 26 31 61 Lead, mg/kg < 4 2 8.4 10 Mercury, mg/kg <0.1 0.05 <0.1 0.05 <0.1 0.05 Molybdenum, mg/kg <0.8 0.4 <0.8 0.4 <0.8 0.4 Nickel, mg/kg 12 13 27 Nitrate as N, mg/kg < 0.5 0.25 < 0.5 0.25 3.6 Phosphorus, mg/kg 1000 1300 980 Potassium, mg/kg 1100 1800 2400 Selenium, mg/kg <7 3.50 <7 3.50 <7 3.50 Zinc, mg/kg 94 150 230 CEC, mg-eq/100g 11 14 12 ph 10 8.9 10.3 Specific Conductance (µs/cm) 2100 320 1800

2008 - Waste Analysis Data Summary Parameters Ash Pond Lime Mud Main Ditch ASB Spoils GLD/Ash Press Sludge Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg -- -- -- 1.70 1.90 -- Cadmium, mg/kg -- -- -- 1.30 6.30 -- Chromium mg/kg 1.40 1.90 3.30 3.00 17.00 0.70 Copper, mg/kg 15.20 3.30 21.70 29.70 243.50 7.20 Lead, mg/kg -- -- -- 6.90 29.90 -- Mercury, mg/kg 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 Molybdenum, mg/kg -- -- -- 0.05 0.05 -- Nickel, mg/kg 0.60 1.20 6.90 3.20 87.60 1.60 Zinc, mg/kg 1.90 2.00 3.80 4.10 14.80 0.90 Selenium, mg/kg -- -- -- 0.40 0.60 -- TKN, mg/kg 483.00 564.00 481.00 725.00 534.00 503.00 Phosphorus, mg/kg 389.00 507.00 652.00 619.00 277.00 124.00 Potassium, mg/kg 1384.00 178.00 515.00 325.00 4627.00 269.00 Nitrate-N, mg/kg 104.00 123.00 255.00 144.00 162.00 263.00 Ammonia-N, mg/kg 78.00 126.00 98.00 68.00 73.00 81.00 % Solids 0.21 0.61 0.42 0.30 0.32 0.31 % Volatile Solids 0.07 0.39 0.11 0.70 0.09 0.29 ph (su) PCB's mg/kg 8.84 -- 9.69 -- 7.14 -- 6.50 0.50 11.60 0.50 9.11 -- 2009 - Waste Analysis Data Summary Parameters Ash Pond Lime Mud Main Ditch ASB Spoils GLD/Ash Press Sludge Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg -- -- -- 2.50 2.50 -- Cadmium, mg/kg -- -- -- 0.20 6.20 -- Chromium mg/kg 11.00 3.40 14.00 15.00 21.00 1.70 Copper, mg/kg 55.00 1.70 22.00 110.00 230.00 4.00 Lead, mg/kg -- -- -- 26.00 14.00 -- Mercury, mg/kg 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Molybdenum, mg/kg -- -- -- 0.40 0.40 -- Nickel, mg/kg 12.00 4.90 16.00 7.70 100.00 1.80 Zinc, mg/kg 94.00 540.00 81.00 200.00 670.00 13.00 Selenium, mg/kg -- -- -- 3.50 3.50 -- TKN, mg/kg 110.00 23.00 900.00 1200.00 380.00 180.00 Phosphorus, mg/kg 1400.00 1400.00 1300.00 840.00 650.00 140.00 Potassium, mg/kg 3200.00 210.00 890.00 1400.00 3000.00 440.00 Nitrate-N, mg/kg 2.50 2.50 16.00 200.00 2.50 7.00 Ammonia-N, mg/kg 15.00 1.30 24.00 150.00 20.00 9.70 % Solids 0.29 0.78 0.41 0.47 0.32 0.36 % Volatile Solids 0.48 0.18 0.33 0.29 0.25 0.91 ph (su) 9.30 12.50 6.80 8.00 10.90 8.90 PCB's mg/kg -- -- -- 0.11 0.16 --

2010 - Waste Analysis Data Summary Parameters Ash Pond Lime Mud Main Ditch ASB Spoils GLD/Ash Press Sludge Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg -- -- -- 2.50 2.50 -- Cadmium, mg/kg -- -- -- 0.20 2.90 -- Chromium mg/kg 10.00 2.10 13.00 14.00 13.00 11.00 Copper, mg/kg 51.00 1.10 63.00 15.00 94.00 4.70 Lead, mg/kg -- -- -- 9.10 11.00 -- Mercury, mg/kg 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Molybdenum, mg/kg -- -- -- 0.40 0.40 -- Nickel, mg/kg 22.00 4.40 23.00 9.20 43.00 13.00 Zinc, mg/kg 180.00 8.00 61.00 120.00 350.00 18.00 Selenium, mg/kg -- -- -- 3.50 3.50 -- TKN, mg/kg 270.00 93.00 510.00 600.00 250.00 -- Phosphorus, mg/kg 550.00 1500.00 1000.00 780.00 610.00 230.00 Potassium, mg/kg 1500.00 130.00 2000.00 2300.00 2200.00 350.00 Nitrate-N, mg/kg 0.25 0.25 0.25 5.80 0.25 4.25 Ammonia-N, mg/kg 11.00 2.35 18.00 80.00 11.00 7.80 % Solids 0.53 0.64 0.43 0.56 0.48 0.54 % Volatile Solids 0.11 0.10 0.23 0.19 0.12 0.89 ph (su) PCB's mg/kg 11.30 -- 9.10 -- 7.70 -- 8.10 -- 12.10 -- 9.60 -- 2011 - Waste Analysis Data Summary Parameters Ash Pond Lime Mud Main Ditch ASB Spoils GLD/Ash Press Sludge Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis Arsenic, mg/kg -- -- -- 2.50 2.50 -- Cadmium, mg/kg -- -- -- 2.80 2.10 -- Chromium mg/kg 7.40 1.60 16.00 31.00 9.40 0.35 Copper, mg/kg 34.00 0.30 14.00 29.00 54.00 1.10 Lead, mg/kg -- -- -- 11.00 8.00 -- Mercury, mg/kg 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Molybdenum, mg/kg -- -- -- 0.40 0.40 -- Nickel, mg/kg 10.00 3.90 30.00 7.00 14.00 0.50 Zinc, mg/kg 570.00 9.00 64.00 290.00 310.00 9.10 Selenium, mg/kg -- -- -- 3.50 3.50 -- TKN, mg/kg 33.00 13.50 960.00 590.00 100.00 24.50 Phosphorus, mg/kg 2000.00 930.00 880.00 1800.00 2600.00 49.00 Potassium, mg/kg 6600.00 160.00 1800.00 760.00 4300.00 370.00 Nitrate-N, mg/kg 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Ammonia-N, mg/kg 11.00 1.50 13.00 170.00 42.00 7.70 % Solids 0.31 0.61 0.57 0.31 0.24 0.33 % Volatile Solids 0.32 0.97 0.10 0.33 0.44 0.96 ph (su) 9.60 12.10 7.20 7.90 12.40 9.95 PCB's mg/kg -- -- -- 0.17 0.21 --

Evergreen Packaging Cubic Yards per Year (wet) Data Pulled from Land App - BeneficialUse.xls in each year's Annual Report Folder Year CY (Cubic Yards) Applied* Ash Lime Main Ditch ASB GLD/Ash 2008 -- -- 5,472 2,628 31,238 2009 -- -- -- -- 64,277 2010 5,880 5,880 13,300 41,080 Average 5,880 5,880 5,472 7,964 45,532 Average (tons) 5,994 5,994 5,578 8,118 46,414 * Used CY = Tons * 0.981 Location % Solids CY/yr (wet) Ton/yr (wet) Gallon/yr (wet) CY/yr (dry) Tons/yr (dry) Ash 33.5% 5,880 5,994 1,187,760 1,971 2,009 Lime Mud 66.1% 5,880 5,994 1,187,760 3,887 3,962 Main Ditch 45.7% 5,472 5,578 1,105,344 2,502 2,551 ASB Spoils 40.9% 7,964 8,118 1,608,728 3,257 3,320 GLD/Ash 33.9% 45,532 46,414 9,197,397 15,447 15,746

Appendix D Historical Analytical Data (2008-2011)

Blevins, Terri From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Ungerank, Ralph Tuesday, July 03, 2012 7:11 AM Blevins, Terri 4579-WR-5 Revised WMP Revised_WMP_6-29-12.pdf Can you put this on the web? Colby Ungerank Engineer ADEQ, Water Division 5301 Northshore Drive North Little Rock, AR 72118 501 682 0047 1