arxiv:cond-mat/ v2 11 Dec 2000

Similar documents
TESTS BASED ON MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD

Lecture 9: Tolerant Testing

Chapter 9 Jordan Block Matrices

Chapter 2 - Free Vibration of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems - II

Part 4b Asymptotic Results for MRR2 using PRESS. Recall that the PRESS statistic is a special type of cross validation procedure (see Allen (1971))

MATH 247/Winter Notes on the adjoint and on normal operators.

best estimate (mean) for X uncertainty or error in the measurement (systematic, random or statistical) best

Lecture 07: Poles and Zeros

Lecture 3. Sampling, sampling distributions, and parameter estimation

Lecture 7. Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Tests in the Simple CLR Model

C-1: Aerodynamics of Airfoils 1 C-2: Aerodynamics of Airfoils 2 C-3: Panel Methods C-4: Thin Airfoil Theory

9 U-STATISTICS. Eh =(m!) 1 Eh(X (1),..., X (m ) ) i.i.d

Estimation of Stress- Strength Reliability model using finite mixture of exponential distributions

MOLECULAR VIBRATIONS

ANALYSIS ON THE NATURE OF THE BASIC EQUATIONS IN SYNERGETIC INTER-REPRESENTATION NETWORK

CIS 800/002 The Algorithmic Foundations of Data Privacy October 13, Lecture 9. Database Update Algorithms: Multiplicative Weights

{ }{ ( )} (, ) = ( ) ( ) ( ) Chapter 14 Exercises in Sampling Theory. Exercise 1 (Simple random sampling): Solution:

Point Estimation: definition of estimators

Non-degenerate Perturbation Theory

III-16 G. Brief Review of Grand Orthogonality Theorem and impact on Representations (Γ i ) l i = h n = number of irreducible representations.

F. Inequalities. HKAL Pure Mathematics. 進佳數學團隊 Dr. Herbert Lam 林康榮博士. [Solution] Example Basic properties

Summary of the lecture in Biostatistics

Non-uniform Turán-type problems

Econometric Methods. Review of Estimation

PTAS for Bin-Packing

1 Mixed Quantum State. 2 Density Matrix. CS Density Matrices, von Neumann Entropy 3/7/07 Spring 2007 Lecture 13. ψ = α x x. ρ = p i ψ i ψ i.

Introduction to local (nonparametric) density estimation. methods

Lecture 02: Bounding tail distributions of a random variable

Chapter 14 Logistic Regression Models

Chapter 3 Sampling For Proportions and Percentages

CHAPTER 4 RADICAL EXPRESSIONS

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2016 Seshia and Walrand DIS 10b

02/15/04 INTERESTING FINITE AND INFINITE PRODUCTS FROM SIMPLE ALGEBRAIC IDENTITIES

Chapter 5 Properties of a Random Sample

ENGI 3423 Simple Linear Regression Page 12-01

Extreme Value Theory: An Introduction

Mu Sequences/Series Solutions National Convention 2014

STK4011 and STK9011 Autumn 2016

Ordinary Least Squares Regression. Simple Regression. Algebra and Assumptions.

THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY HIGHER CERTIFICATE

Arithmetic Mean and Geometric Mean

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gm] 8 Dec 2005

A Markov Chain Competition Model

The Mathematical Appendix

X ε ) = 0, or equivalently, lim

Lecture Notes Types of economic variables

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRIC APPROACH TO HAMILTONIAN MECHANICS

QR Factorization and Singular Value Decomposition COS 323

MA/CSSE 473 Day 27. Dynamic programming

Beam Warming Second-Order Upwind Method

STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF LEAST SQUARES ESTIMATORS. x, where. = y - ˆ " 1

Class 13,14 June 17, 19, 2015

ON THE ELEMENTARY SYMMETRIC FUNCTIONS OF A SUM OF MATRICES

Bounds on the expected entropy and KL-divergence of sampled multinomial distributions. Brandon C. Roy

BIOREPS Problem Set #11 The Evolution of DNA Strands

CHAPTER VI Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Ahmed Elgamal. MDOF Systems & Modal Analysis

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

ESS Line Fitting

Lecture 16: Backpropogation Algorithm Neural Networks with smooth activation functions

Some Notes on the Probability Space of Statistical Surveys

Multiple Regression. More than 2 variables! Grade on Final. Multiple Regression 11/21/2012. Exam 2 Grades. Exam 2 Re-grades

We have already referred to a certain reaction, which takes place at high temperature after rich combustion.

Functions of Random Variables

5 Short Proofs of Simplified Stirling s Approximation

Lecture 12 APPROXIMATION OF FIRST ORDER DERIVATIVES

ECONOMETRIC THEORY. MODULE VIII Lecture - 26 Heteroskedasticity

UNIT 2 SOLUTION OF ALGEBRAIC AND TRANSCENDENTAL EQUATIONS

LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS

2006 Jamie Trahan, Autar Kaw, Kevin Martin University of South Florida United States of America

Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design. Introduction to Analysis of Variance. Introduction to Analysis of Variance

Bayes Estimator for Exponential Distribution with Extension of Jeffery Prior Information

Unsupervised Learning and Other Neural Networks

Assignment 5/MATH 247/Winter Due: Friday, February 19 in class (!) (answers will be posted right after class)

( ) = ( ) ( ) Chapter 13 Asymptotic Theory and Stochastic Regressors. Stochastic regressors model

The Occupancy and Coupon Collector problems

1 Lyapunov Stability Theory

THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY 2016 EXAMINATIONS SOLUTIONS HIGHER CERTIFICATE MODULE 5

Lecture 2 - What are component and system reliability and how it can be improved?

1 Solution to Problem 6.40

Lecture 4 Sep 9, 2015

A Study of the Reproducibility of Measurements with HUR Leg Extension/Curl Research Line

Derivation of 3-Point Block Method Formula for Solving First Order Stiff Ordinary Differential Equations

Homework 1: Solutions Sid Banerjee Problem 1: (Practice with Asymptotic Notation) ORIE 4520: Stochastics at Scale Fall 2015

Statistics: Unlocking the Power of Data Lock 5

hp calculators HP 30S Statistics Averages and Standard Deviations Average and Standard Deviation Practice Finding Averages and Standard Deviations

1 Onto functions and bijections Applications to Counting

Applying the condition for equilibrium to this equilibrium, we get (1) n i i =, r G and 5 i

22 Nonparametric Methods.

. The set of these sums. be a partition of [ ab, ]. Consider the sum f( x) f( x 1)

Strong Convergence of Weighted Averaged Approximants of Asymptotically Nonexpansive Mappings in Banach Spaces without Uniform Convexity

Chapter 4 (Part 1): Non-Parametric Classification (Sections ) Pattern Classification 4.3) Announcements

Special Instructions / Useful Data

A Remark on the Uniform Convergence of Some Sequences of Functions

Third handout: On the Gini Index

Physics 114 Exam 2 Fall Name:

Lecture 3 Probability review (cont d)

Lecture Note to Rice Chapter 8

Simulation Output Analysis

Can we take the Mysticism Out of the Pearson Coefficient of Linear Correlation?

Transcription:

arxv:cod-mat/0006 v Dec 000 THE NTURE OF THE LON TIME DECY T SECOND ORDER TRNSITION POINT Moshe Schwartz School of Physcs ad stroomy Tel vv Uversty Tel vv, Ramat vv, Israel d S. F. Edwards Cavedsh Laboratory Maddgley Rd. CB3 OHE, Cambrdge, UK We show that at a secod order phase trasto, of 4 φ lke system, a ecessary codto for stretched expoetal decay of the tme depedet structure factor s obeyed. Usg the deas preseted ths proof a crude estmate of the decay of the structure factor s obtaed ad show to yeld stretched expoetal decay uder very reasoable codtos.

The decay of dsturbaces some physcal systems s kow to be a stretched expoetal tme. The caocal lst of those systems cludes glasses, -3 polymer solutos 4,5 ad such a form of decay s also characterstc of delectrc ad vscoelastc relaxato. 6,7 I recet work 8,9 we have show that ths form of decay s much wder spread tha expected. We clam, fact, that such a decay s preset may o-lear systems such as magets at ther crtcal pot, systems of the KPZ type etc. These systems share the property that a dsturbace of wave vector, µ decays at eulbrum wth a characterstc decay rate, ω, that s proportoal to wth µ >. Sce, the problems volved are very dffcult, the dervato has to rely o approxmatos. Therefore, t s very mportat to have some exact results that may also suggest a tutve uderstadg of the stretched expoetal decay. We start by gvg a exact proof that the codto for a slow form of decay s fulflled at the crtcal pot of a system of the φ 4 type. We cotue the, by employg the same basc deas, to argue that deed the decay s a stretched expoetal tme. The system we have md s a classcal φ 4 system at ts crtcal pot or ay geeralzato of t. We wll also assume that the classcal Hamltoa, W, that govers the statcs s eve the feld φ. It s well kow that Lagev dyamcs of the system leads to a Schroedger lke evoluto euato 0-3 ψ Hψ, () t where ψ s related to the probablty dstrbuto of obtag a gve feld cofgurato { φ } at tme t, P{ φ, t}, by P{ φ, t} exp[ W / ] ψ{ φ, t} ad where the "Hamltoa" H λ W W W { + } ( λ λ > 0) 4 () s Hermta, o egatve ad ts oly egefucto wth egevalue zero, s the groud state ψ Pe exp[ W / ]. I the followg we wll chose λ to be proportoal to θ wth θ that s ot too egatve. (The meag of the last phrase wll become clear later). Past studes of the dyamcs of the o θ 0 ad θ. 3-5 4 φ system cocetrated The persstece of a dsturbace of wave vector the ormalzed tme depedet structure factor at eulbrum s descrbed by

Φ ( < φ (0) φ( > α (, Φ (0) < φ (0) φ (0) > where the averages o the rght had sde of the above mea that φ s measured eulbrum at tme t 0 the the system s allowed to evolve freely ad φ s measured at tme t. Next, we express α (t ) terms of the egefuctos ad egevalues of the "Hamltoa" H. Sce H commutes wth the mometum operator, the egefuctos of H ca be chose also to be egefuctos of the mometum operator. Let ψ } be the set of ormalzed egefuctos of H, that {, are also egefuctos of the mometum operator wth egevalue. The correspodg set of egevalues of H s { λ }. We fd that α ( ( ψ, ( ψ, φ ψ, ), φ ψ λ t e ) (3) It s obvous that f the smallest egevalue the set { λ }, λ o, s really postve, α ( caot decay slower tha expoetal. Our frst goal s to show that to zero order Ω, the volume of the system, λo s deed zero at the crtcal pot. Cosder the set of uormalzed egefuctos of the mometum operator wth mometum, ( χ ;,..., ) Πφ ψ > ( ) (4) (To smplfy we restrct ourselves the followg to sets { } that do ot have a subset that sums up to zero. Ths restrcto ca be avoded a more detaled presetato). The expectato value of H, ( ) < χ( ;,..., ) H χ( ;,..., ) > µ (,,..., ), (5) < χ(,,..., ) χ (,,..., ) > s a exact upper boud o λ o by the varatoal theorem (appled to the sector of states wth mometum ). The expectato value µ ca be easly calculated, usg the detty ψ Λ HΛ ψ > < ψ [ Λ,[ H, Λ ]] ψ > (6) <

The result s ( ) λ ( ;,..., ) ( µ + O ) Φ (0) Ω, (7) so that the lmt of the fte system the sum o the rght had of the above yelds the exact result. Note, that although the fal result may seem to be the result of a aussa approxmato t s fact the full exact result. The o aussa correctos vash whe the volume of the system teds to fty. t the trasto (0) +η Φ s proportoal to, so that the term that s zero order Ω o the rght had sde of e.(7) has the form Γ ( ). It s straghtforward to show that K f Γ such a sum attas ts mmal value whe. The value of the sum at ( ) (+ θ ) + η + θ η the mmum s µ ( ) α. If θ s ot too egatve +θ η s postve ( ) ad µ ( ) teds to zero as teds to fty, for all. Ths mples at oce that λ s deed zero. What we have show s that the (postve) spectrum λ } s ot o boud from below by ay postve value. We have thus prove that the ecessary codto for the exstece of a stretched expoetal decay holds at the pot of trasto. We tur ow to obtag a crude estmate of α ( at log tmes, that s based o the smple deas that have already bee preseted above. We wll assume that the system has exctatos carryg mometum ad eergy ω z B ad that all the states of the system ca be approxmately descrbed as a collecto of such exctato, so that each state ca be tagged by the total umber of exctatos preset ad the "eergy" of a state carryg total mometum s gve approxmately by ( ) λ ( ;,..., ) ω (8) Ths assumpto s motvated by the form of the tral fuctos (e. 5) ad the correspodg dagoal elemets of the Hamltoa H, (e. 7). The decay fucto α ( s gve by { α ( Πd δ ( ) a (,..., ω t ) e (9),3 By the varatoal theorem t s obvous that z >, so that the mmal value of ( ) λ ( ;,..., ) s B z z ad ths value s attaed at the pot { / }. Cosder the uatty 3

t Π δ (0) (, d ( ) a (,..., ) e ω It s clear that the most domat cotrbuto to (, comes from the vcty of the pot { / }. Stadard asymptotcs yelds the large t behavour of (, t ) d z (, exp[ f ( ) ( ) ( ω ωt]. () I obtag the above we also reured that (, ( ω. The log tme behavour of α ( s ow determed by obtag the most domat ( ω from the euato ' d z f ( ) ( ω + ( z ) ω t 0 () The fucto f () s ot kow detal. We have good reaso, however, to beleve b d that exp[ f ( )] c [ ] ( wth d > 0) for large. The argumets for such a form are beyod the scope of ths paper, so we are gog to use the above form as a assumpto ad obta the resultg log tme behavour of α (. We wll the cosder how the behavour of α ( s chaged f we assume the less lkely a behavour of f (), f () for large wth a >. For the frst case we fd that to leadg order ω the domat cotrbuto comes from *, where t z * [ ωt], (up to a logarthmc factor ω (3) so that z θ α( ω [ ω t] exp[ γω t], ( θ b / z) (4) where aga we have eglected logarthmc factors that multply ω t, just for the sake of smplcty. The stretched expoetal form obtaed here s exactly the form we foud usg etrely dfferet methods. 8,9 a Now suppose f ( ) wth a >. Stll the stretched expoetal decay s recovered but wth a dfferet stretchg expoet α a θ ' a+ z ( ω [ ω t] exp[ γωt], (5) ' where θ s to be determed from fer detals of f (). We see that oly the lmt a we obta the expoetal behavour, that ca be show deed to be a exact lower boud o the decay. The cocluso s that eve f a >, as log as t s fte, the decay must be domated by a stretched expoetal fucto. 4

Refereces. V. Chamberle,. Muzorkewch ad R. Orbach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 867 (984).. F. Meze ad. P. Mura, Jour. Mag. Matt., 4, (976). 3. J. C. Phllps, Rep. Prog. Phys. 59, 33 (996). 4... Joes et al., Macromolecules 6, 658 (983). 5. K. L. L et al., Macromolecules, 940 (983). 6.. Wllams ad D.c. Watts, Tras. Faraday Soc. 66, 680 (970). 7. R. Kohlraush,. Phys. (Lepzg), 393 (847). 8. M. Schwartz ad S. F. Edwards submtted. 9. S. F. Edwards ad M. Schwartz submtted. 0. H. Rske "The Fokker Plack Euato", Sprger Verlag, Berl 989.. T. Scheder, M. Zaett, R. Bad ad H. R. Jausl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 9 (984).. T. Scheder, M. Zaett ad R. Bad, Phys. Rev. B3, 94 (985). 3. T. Scheder ad M. Schwartz, Phys. Rev. B. Rc 3, 7484 (985). 4. B. I. Halper ad P.C. Hoheberg, Phys. Rev. 77, 95 (969). 5. B. I. Halper, P. C. Hoheberg ad S. K. Ma, Phys. Rev. B0, 39 (974). 5