The Model and Preliminaries Problems and Solutions

Similar documents
Math 201 Assignment #11

SOURCE IDENTIFICATION FOR THE HEAT EQUATION WITH MEMORY. Sergei Avdonin, Gulden Murzabekova, and Karlygash Nurtazina. IMA Preprint Series #2459

Review Sol. of More Long Answer Questions

PoS(CSTNA2005)015. Controllability of the Gurtin-Pipkin equation. Luciano Pandolfi Politecnico Di Torino

MA 201: Method of Separation of Variables Finite Vibrating String Problem Lecture - 11 MA201(2016): PDE

MATH 220: Problem Set 3 Solutions

Plot of temperature u versus x and t for the heat conduction problem of. ln(80/π) = 820 sec. τ = 2500 π 2. + xu t. = 0 3. u xx. + u xt 4.

There are five problems. Solve four of the five problems. Each problem is worth 25 points. A sheet of convenient formulae is provided.

Existence Results for Multivalued Semilinear Functional Differential Equations

MATH 251 Final Examination December 16, 2015 FORM A. Name: Student Number: Section:

1 Wave Equation on Finite Interval

Stability of an abstract wave equation with delay and a Kelvin Voigt damping

Exponential stability of abstract evolution equations with time delay feedback

Spectra of the Gurtin-Pipkin type equations

MATH 251 Final Examination August 14, 2015 FORM A. Name: Student Number: Section:

Math 342 Partial Differential Equations «Viktor Grigoryan

MATH 251 Final Examination May 3, 2017 FORM A. Name: Student Number: Section:

SAMPLE FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS

Existence And Uniqueness Of Mild Solutions Of Second Order Volterra Integrodifferential Equations With Nonlocal Conditions

Hyperbolic PDEs. Chapter 6

Method of Separation of Variables

Math 124A October 11, 2011

Vibrating-string problem

Nontrivial Solutions for Boundary Value Problems of Nonlinear Differential Equation

Functional Differential Equations with Causal Operators

Week 4 Lectures, Math 6451, Tanveer

Boundary value problems for partial differential equations

17 Source Problems for Heat and Wave IB- VPs

Lecture Notes on PDEs

Math 220A - Fall 2002 Homework 5 Solutions

MATH 131P: PRACTICE FINAL SOLUTIONS DECEMBER 12, 2012

MATH 251 Final Examination August 10, 2011 FORM A. Name: Student Number: Section:

Linear Differential Equations. Problems

Wave type spectrum of the Gurtin-Pipkin equation of the second order

ON SPECTRAL METHODS FOR VOLTERRA INTEGRAL EQUATIONS AND THE CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS * 1. Introduction

Mathematics of Physics and Engineering II: Homework problems

Nonlinear Control Lecture 5: Stability Analysis II

Reflected Brownian Motion

MA 201: Partial Differential Equations D Alembert s Solution Lecture - 7 MA 201 (2016), PDE 1 / 20

Differential equations, comprehensive exam topics and sample questions

Fractional differential equations with integral boundary conditions

0 3 x < x < 5. By continuing in this fashion, and drawing a graph, it can be seen that T = 2.

A proof for the full Fourier series on [ π, π] is given here.

MA Chapter 10 practice

SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS FROM ASSIGNMENT 5. Problems 3.1:6bd

Lecture Notes 4: Fourier Series and PDE s

Conservative Control Systems Described by the Schrödinger Equation

Partial differential equation for temperature u(x, t) in a heat conducting insulated rod along the x-axis is given by the Heat equation:

Math 5587 Midterm II Solutions

NONLOCAL DIFFUSION EQUATIONS

1. The one-dimensional linear wave equation (WE) on the real line is:

Diffusion on the half-line. The Dirichlet problem

u xx + u yy = 0. (5.1)

Partial Differential Equations

SOLUTIONS TO QUASI-LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH ITERATED DEVIATING ARGUMENTS

Superconvergence analysis of multistep collocation method for delay Volterra integral equations

Numerical Solutions to Partial Differential Equations

Lecture 3. This operator commutes with translations and it is not hard to evaluate. Ae iξx = ψ(ξ)e iξx. T t I. A = lim

ENGI 9420 Lecture Notes 8 - PDEs Page 8.01

Elliptic Operators with Unbounded Coefficients

FOURIER METHODS AND DISTRIBUTIONS: SOLUTIONS

The multidimensional Ito Integral and the multidimensional Ito Formula. Eric Mu ller June 1, 2015 Seminar on Stochastic Geometry and its applications

JUNXIA MENG. 2. Preliminaries. 1/k. x = max x(t), t [0,T ] x (t), x k = x(t) dt) k

UNCERTAINTY FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS FOR FINANCE

A numerical method for the wave equation subject to a non-local conservation condition

Final: Solutions Math 118A, Fall 2013

BLOW-UP OF SOLUTIONS FOR VISCOELASTIC EQUATIONS OF KIRCHHOFF TYPE WITH ARBITRARY POSITIVE INITIAL ENERGY

Partial Differential Equations for Engineering Math 312, Fall 2012

PDE and Boundary-Value Problems Winter Term 2014/2015

FINAL EXAM MATH303 Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations. Spring dx dt = x + 3y dy dt = x y.

MA 201: Differentiation and Integration of Fourier Series Applications of Fourier Series Lecture - 10

Tutorial 2. Introduction to numerical schemes

Relative Controllability of Fractional Dynamical Systems with Multiple Delays in Control

CIS 4930/6930: Principles of Cyber-Physical Systems

Final Examination Linear Partial Differential Equations. Matthew J. Hancock. Feb. 3, 2006

Determining the Length of a One-Dimensional Bar

Asymptotic behaviour of the heat equation in twisted waveguides

Least Squares Based Self-Tuning Control Systems: Supplementary Notes

DUHAMEL S PRINCIPLE FOR THE WAVE EQUATION HEAT EQUATION WITH EXPONENTIAL GROWTH or DECAY COOLING OF A SPHERE DIFFUSION IN A DISK SUMMARY of PDEs

MATH 251 Final Examination December 16, 2014 FORM A. Name: Student Number: Section:

Math 4263 Homework Set 1

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Midterm 2: Sample solutions Math 118A, Fall 2013

Feedback Stabilization of Systems with

Volterra Integral Equations of the First Kind with Jump Discontinuous Kernels

Ma 221 Final Exam Solutions 5/14/13

EXISTENCE OF NEUTRAL STOCHASTIC FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH ABSTRACT VOLTERRA OPERATORS

Brownian Motion. 1 Definition Brownian Motion Wiener measure... 3

Mean-field SDE driven by a fractional BM. A related stochastic control problem

Chapter 3 Second Order Linear Equations

THE WAVE EQUATION. F = T (x, t) j + T (x + x, t) j = T (sin(θ(x, t)) + sin(θ(x + x, t)))

Partial differential equations (ACM30220)

Regularity of the density for the stochastic heat equation

ENGI 9420 Lecture Notes 8 - PDEs Page 8.01

MULTIPLICITY OF CONCAVE AND MONOTONE POSITIVE SOLUTIONS FOR NONLINEAR FOURTH-ORDER ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

Semigroup Generation

Partial Differential Equations

On the solvability of an inverse fractional abstract Cauchy problem

Propagation of Solitons Under Colored Noise

The method of successive approximations for exact solutions of Laplace equation and of heat-like and wave-like equations with variable coefficients

Transcription:

Chapter The Model and Preliminaries Problems and Solutions Facts that are recalled in the problems The wave equation u = c u + G(x,t), { u(x,) = u (x), u (x,) = v (x), u(x,t) = f (x,t) x Γ, u(x,t) = x Ω \Γ (.) and its solutions u(t) = R + (c t)u + A R (c t)v + A R (c (t s))g(s)ds c c c A R (c (t s))d f (s)ds, (.) u (t) = c A R (c t)u + R + (c t)v + R + (c (t s))g(s)ds c A R + (c (t s))d f (s)ds. (.3) The equations with persistent memory: w (x,t) = cw (x,t) + c w(x,t) + M(t s) w(x,s)ds + F(x,t), (.4) w (x,t) = cw(x,t) + N(t s) w(x,s)ds + H(x,t). (.5) Eq. (.5) is the HEAT EQUATION WITH MEMORY. In particular, when Ω is an interval, we get: θ = N(t s)θ xx (s)ds + H(t), θ(,t) = f (t), θ(π,t) =. (.6) This equation is obtained when the Fourier law for the flux q(x,t) is replaced by

Problems of Chapter The cosine formula: q(x,t) = k N(t s)θ x (x,s)ds, (.7) R + (t)r + (τ) = (R +(t) + R + (τ)) t,τ IR. (.8) Fourier expansion for the cosine operator R + (t) ( n= We introduce also the operators R (t) = Integration by parts: α n ϕ n ) = n= (α n cosλ n t)ϕ n (x). (.9) [ e A t e A t], S(t) = A R (t), t IR. R + (t s)u (s)ds = = u(t) R + (t)u() + c A Finally, we recall: R (t s)u (s)ds = = R (t)u() + c A R (t s)u(s)ds, (.) R + (t s)u(s)ds. (.) Theorem.. Let u doma, v doma, G D(Ω (,T )) and f D(Γ (,T )). Then, the function u(t) in (.) is a regular solution of Eq. (4.) and the following equality holds for every t: u (t) = c A(u(t) D f (t)) + G(t). (.) The Problems.. Consider the following system of two ordinary differential equations: u = 3u + w, w = 3w + u. Let the initial conditions be u() = u, u () =, w() = w, w () =. Represent the solution as the operator S(t) called SINE OPERATOR.

Problems of Chapter 3 ( ) ( ) u(t) u = R(t). w(t) w Prove that R(t) is a cosine operator in the sense that it verifies equality (.8)... Show that the family of the operators R + (t) defined by (R + (t)ϕ)(x) = (ϕ(x +t) + ϕ(x t)) (.3) is a cosine operator in L (IR), in the sense that equality (.8) holds for this family of operators. Decide whether it is possible to represent this cosine operator with a Fourier type expansion, as in (.9)..3. Show that the series representation (.9) for the cosine operator can be obtained by separation of variables. Write it explicitly in the case Ω = (,π)..4. Write the series (.9) which represents the cosine operator of the problem u = u xx + u yy (x,y) Q = (,π) (,π), u = on Q ( Q is not of class C but the results we have seen extend to this case)..5. Prove the integration by parts formulas (.) and (.)..6. Prove Theorem. when f =, G = but the initial conditions are not zero; and do the same when control and initial conditions are zero, but G..7. Prove that under the condition of Theorem., and if furthermore u and v belong to D(Ω) then the function u(t) is of class C ([,T ];L (Ω))..8. Let x (,π) and u = u(x,t) while w = w(t) depends only on the time. Assuming zero initial conditions, discuss the time at which the effect of the input f affects the output y in the case of the systems w = w + f (t) u = u xx, u(,t) = f (t), u(π,t) = w = w + / /3 u(x,s)dx y(t) = w(t), u tt = u xx + (/3,/) (x)w(t) u(,t) = u(π,t) = y(t) = 3/4 u(x,t)dt The function (/3,/) (x) is the characteristic function of (/3,/)..9. The notations u and w are as in Problem.8 while x (,7). Let y(t) = w(t) IR be the output of the following system (α > is a real parameter): 6 u = u xx + (,α) (x) f (t), w = w + u(x, t)dx 3 (u = u(x, t) with x (, 7)) and conditions

4 Problems of Chapter { u(,t) =, u(7,t) = f (t), u(x,) =, u (x,) =, w() =. Study at what time the effect of the external input f (t) will influence the observation y(t) and specify whether the time depends on α... On a region Ω, consider the problem w = w + w(s)ds, w() = u L (Ω), w = on Ω. (.4) This equation is not of the same type as those studied in this paper (it is called a Jeffrey, or a Colemann-Gurtin model. Of course in general the memory kernel is not a constant). Its solution cannot be obtained using cosine operators. Prove that Eq. (.4) can be reduced to a Volterra integral equation using the semigroup e At. It is a fact that the controllability properties of Eq. (.4) are very different from those of Eq. (.5), see [,, 3, 4]... Let Ω = (,) and consider the heat equation with memory (.6) with H = and N(t) (hence, an integrated version of the string equation). Assume zero initial condition and θ(,t) = f (t), θ(,t) =. Use (.7) with initial time t = and k =. Compute the flux q(t) on t (,) and show that the function t q(t) belongs to C([,];L (,)). Let either T = or T =. Study whether the pair (θ(t ),q(t )) can be controlled to hit any target (ξ,η) L (,) L (,) using a control f L (,T ). The Solutions Solution of Problem. Let ξ = u + w and η = u w. Then ξ and η solve ξ = ξ, η = 4η with initial condition So we have ξ () = u + w, ξ () =, η() = u w, η () =. ξ (t) = (u + v )cos t, η(t) = (u w )cost. We compute w(t) = (/)(ξ η) and u(t) = (/)(ξ + η) and we find [ ] [ ] u(t) u = R(t) w(t) where w

Problems of Chapter 5 ( R(t) = cos ) ( t + cost cos ) t cost (cos ) ( t cost cos ). t + cost The cosine formula of trigonometry easily shows that R(t) satisfies the (operator) cosine formula (.9). Solution of Problem. We compute [ ] R + (t)(r + (τ)ϕ) = R + (t) (ϕ(x + τ) + ϕ(x τ)) = [{ϕ(x +t + τ) + ϕ(x t + τ)} + {ϕ(x τ +t) + ϕ(x τ t)}]. 4 It is easily seen that this is equal to R +(τ +t)ϕ + R (t τ)ϕ = [ϕ(x +t + τ) + ϕ(x t τ) + ϕ(x +t τ) + ϕ(x t + τ)]. 4 So, the cosine formula holds. Expression (.3) represents the solution of the problem u = u xx x IR with conditions u(x,) = ϕ(x) L (IR), u (x,) =. Hence, R(t) is the cosine operator generated by A in L (IR), where dom(a) = H (IR), Au = u xx. It is easy to see that the operator A does not have any eigenvalue so that R + (t) cannot be represented using a Fourier expansion. Solution of Problem.3 Inner product of both the sides of u = u with ϕ n (x) shows that u n (t) = u(x,t)ϕ n (x)dx Ω solves u n = λn u n, { un () = Ω u (x)ϕ n (x)dx = u n,, u n() = Ω v (x)ϕ n (x)dx = v n,. So we have u n (t) = u n, cosλ n t + v n, λ n sinλ n t, u(t) = R + (t)u + A R (t)v = = n= In the special case Ω = (,π) we have ϕ n (x)[u n, cosλ n t] + ϕ n (x) [v n, sinλ n t]. (.5) λ n ϕ n (x) = n= π sinnx

6 Problems of Chapter and we get the Fourier expansion of the solution u(x,t): [ u(x, t) = π u n, cosnt sinnx + ] n= n v n, sinnt sinnx [ = π u n, {sinn(x +t) + sinn(x t)} ] n v n, {cosn(x t) cosn(x +t)}. n= Solution of Problem.4 The formula is the same as (.5), as soon as noted that the eigenvalues are the numbers λ nm = ( n + m ) and the eigenfunctions are ϕ nm = π sinnxsinmy where n and m are natural (strictly positive). Note that different eigenfunctions may correspond to the same eigenvalue. For example, the eigenfunctions of 3 are π sinxsin3y, π sin3xsiny. There exist also simple eigenvalues. For example 8 has solely the (normalized) eigenfunction π sin3xsin3y. Solution of Problem.5 It is known from semigroup theory that the following formula holds when A generates any C -semigroup and ξ C : e A (t s) ξ (s)ds = ξ (t) e A t ξ () + A e A (t s) ξ (s)ds (.6) (see [5, p. 7]). Note that this formula makes sense because when ξ C the last integral takes values in doma. The integration by parts follows from this formula and the definitions of R + (t) and R (t) (note that R () = ). Solution of Problem.6 When f = and F = we must study the function u (t) = R + (c t)u + c A R (c t)v = R + (c t)u +R (c t)ξ, ξ = c A v hence with both u and ξ in doma = doma. This proves that both R + (c t)u and R (c t)ξ take values in doma, are twice differentiable and solve u = Au. When u =, v = and f = we have to study u (t). A new analysis is not needed since we can write

Problems of Chapter 7 the same form as u 3 (t). u(t) = c A R (c s) c A G(t s)ds, Solution of Problem.7 The function u 3 (t) is clearly of class C when f D( Ω (,T )) since the computations of the derivatives in the proof of Theorem. can be iterated as many times as we whish. The argument in Problem.6 proves that u C. The function u (t) is of class C because D(Ω) doma k for every k. Solution of Problem.8 One of the equations is an ordinary differential equation: it does not introduce any delay. Instead signals propagate with velocity in the space variable x. In the case of the system on the left, y(t) will be affected by the input y as soon as we have u(x,s) for some values of x (/3,/) and this is the case if s > /3. Let us consider the system on the right. The affine term (/3,/) (x)w(t) is affected by the input f at every time t > but it enteres u on the interval (/3,/). It needs a time t > /4 before u affects the integral in the definition of y(t): the hyperbolic part of the system introduces a time lag h = /4 from the input and the output. Solution of Problem.9 If α then the time lag from the input and the outpit is. If α (,3) then the time lag is 3 α. If α > 3 then there is no time lag. Solution of Problem. This equation can be considered as a perturbation of the heat equation w = w + F, F(t) = w(s)ds. The semigroup representation of the solution of the heat equation is w(t) = e At u + e A(t s) F(s)ds where A = with domain H (Ω) H (Ω). So we have, formally, w(t) = e At u + = e At u = e At u s e A(t s) A d ds ea(t s) w(r)dr + s w(r)dr dsds = w(r)dr dsds = e A(t s) w(s)ds. (.7) These formal computations lead to an integral equation of Volterra type for w(t) (in which no unbounded operator appears). The solution of Eq. (.4) is by definition the unique mild solution of this Volterra integral equation. When u D(Ω) we have u doma k for every k and so e At u is of class C ([,);L (Ω)). Hence also the solution w is of class C and the integration

8 Problems of Chapter by parts formula (.6) shows that the integration by parts is correct in this special case. For every T >, the solution w C([,T ];L (Ω)) depends continuously on u L (Ω) and this justifies the definition of the mild solution. Solution of Problem. We first study the system on the time interval [,]. In this case θ(x,t) = f (t x)h(t x) so that q(x,t) = if x > t. Otherwise we have q(x,t) = x = x f (s x)h(s x)ds = x x f (s)ds = f (t x) = θ(x,t). x f (s x)ds = So, the flux and the temperature coincide when < x < t and they cannot be controlled to independent targets: the flux q(x,) and the temperature θ(x,) are not independent. Consequently, also the flux, as the temperature, belongs to C([,T ];L (,)) for T. Now we consider the system on the interval of time (,) and we compute the solution. The function f (t x)h(t x) solves the wave equation and also the boundary condition at x = also when t [,] but it is not zero for x = when t >. We force this second boundary condition by choosing θ(x,t) = f (t x)h(t x) f (t + x)h(t + x), t. Note that the second addendum is equal zero when t [,] and that both the boundary conditions are satisfied for t [,]. Now we compute the flux. We compute first So, θ(x,s)ds = H(t x) = H(t x) x x f (s x)ds H(t + x) f (r)dr H(t + x) +x f (r)dr. x q(x,t) = H(t x) f (t x) + H(t + x) f (t + x) f (s + x)ds = because x +x δ(t x) f (r)dr + δ(t + x) f (r)dr = (compare the remarks in the solutions of Problem.4). Lebesgue theorem on the continuity of the shift in L p spaces shows that q C([,T ];L (,)) for every T.

References 9 Now we compare θ(x,) and q(x,). We have θ(x,) = f ( x) f (x), q(x,) = f ( x) + f (x). We can impose θ(x, ) = ξ (x) and q(x, ) = η(x) (for x (, )) by choosing f (t) = [η(t) ξ (t)] t (,), f (t) = [η( t) + ξ ( t)] t (,). References. Guerrero, S., Imanuvilov, O.Y.: Remarks on non controllability of the heat equation with memory. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 9, 88-3 (3). Halanay, A., Pandolfi, L.: Lack of controllability of the heat equation with memory. Systems Control Lett. 6, 999- () 3. Halanay, A., Pandolfi, L.: Lack of controllability of thermal systems with memory. In print, Evol. Equ. Control Theory. 3 n. 3 4, ArXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/34.386 4. Halanay, A., Pandolfi, L.: Approximate controllability and lack of controllability to zero of the heat equation with memory, submitted, ArXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/44.745 5. Pazy, A.: Semigroups of linear operators and applications to partial differential equations. Applied Mathematical Sciences 44. Springer-Verlag, New York (983)

Problems of Chapter