Electron spin coherence exceeding seconds in high-purity silicon

Similar documents
arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 13 Jul 2018

Pulse techniques for decoupling qubits

Electron Spin Qubits Steve Lyon Electrical Engineering Department Princeton University

arxiv: v2 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 24 Jan 2011

Shallow Donors in Silicon as Electron and Nuclear Spin Qubits Johan van Tol National High Magnetic Field Lab Florida State University

Long-lived spin echoes in magnetically diluted system: an NMR study of the Ge single crystals Alexander M. Panich,

arxiv:cond-mat/ v2 23 Jan 2007

Davies electron-nuclear double resonance revisited: Enhanced sensitivity and nuclear spin relaxation

Lecture2: Quantum Decoherence and Maxwell Angels L. J. Sham, University of California San Diego

Direct observation of the donor nuclear spin in a near-gap bound exciton transition: 31 P in highly enriched 28 Si*

Single Electron Spin in Interacting Nuclear Spin Bath Coherence Loss and Restoration

Disordered Solids. real crystals spin glass. glasses. Grenoble

Understanding spin-qubit decoherence: From models to reality

Lecture 2: Double quantum dots

Nuclear spins in semiconductor quantum dots. Alexander Tartakovskii University of Sheffield, UK

Electron spins in nonmagnetic semiconductors

Dipole-coupling a single-electron double quantum dot to a microwave resonator

Electron spin qubits in P donors in Silicon

Circuit QED with electrons on helium:

A single-atom electron spin qubit in silicon

Optimizing a Dynamical Decoupling Protocol for Solid-State Electronic Spin Ensembles in Diamond

Scheme for a spin-based quantum computer employing induction detection and imaging

Electrical Control of Single Spins in Semiconductor Quantum Dots Jason Petta Physics Department, Princeton University

CIRCUIT QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS WITH ELECTRONS ON HELIUM

Andrea Morello. Nuclear spin dynamics in quantum regime of a single-molecule. magnet. UBC Physics & Astronomy

Electron spin decoherence due to interaction with a nuclear spin bath

DNP in Quantum Computing Eisuke Abe Spintronics Research Center, Keio University

Joint Project between Japan and Korea M. Jeong, M. Song, S. Lee (KAIST, Korea) +KBSI T. Ueno, M. Matsubara (Kyoto University, Japan)+Fukui Univ.

Nomenclature: Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Electron Magnetic Resonance (EMR) Electron Spin Resonance (ESR)

Overview. Magnetism. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) 28/02/2014. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance and Dynamic Nuclear Polarisation AS:MIT CH916

Semiclassical limit and longtime asymptotics of the central spin problem. Gang Chen Doron Bergman Leon Balents

Coherent spin manipulations in Yb 3+ : CaWO_4 at X - and W -band EPR frequencies

Semiconductors: Applications in spintronics and quantum computation. Tatiana G. Rappoport Advanced Summer School Cinvestav 2005

Developing Quantum Logic Gates: Spin-Resonance-Transistors

Towards quantum simulator based on nuclear spins at room temperature

We have already demonstrated polarization of a singular nanodiamond (or bulk diamond) via Nitrogen-Vacancy (NV) centers 1

Spin Qubits in Silicon

Quantum-Bath Decoherence of Hybrid Electron-Nuclear Spin Qubits

Martes cuántico Zaragoza, 8 th October Atomic and molecular spin qubits. Fernando LUIS Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragón

Quantum manipulation of NV centers in diamond

Manipulating and characterizing spin qubits based on donors in silicon with electromagnetic field

Quantum Information Processing with Semiconductor Quantum Dots

Supplementary Information

High Field EPR at the National High. Johan van Tol. Magnetic Field Lab

Introduction. Resonant Cooling of Nuclear Spins in Quantum Dots

Quantum Information Processing with Semiconductor Quantum Dots. slides courtesy of Lieven Vandersypen, TU Delft

Classical behavior of magnetic dipole vector. P. J. Grandinetti

CONTENTS. 2 CLASSICAL DESCRIPTION 2.1 The resonance phenomenon 2.2 The vector picture for pulse EPR experiments 2.3 Relaxation and the Bloch equations

Quantum control of spin qubits in silicon

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 18 May 2012

The Development of a Quantum Computer in Silicon

Enhanced solid-state multi-spin metrology using dynamical decoupling

Lecture 8, April 12, 2017


Ultrafast optical rotations of electron spins in quantum dots. St. Petersburg, Russia

Principles of Magnetic Resonance

Single Spin Qubits, Qubit Gates and Qubit Transfer with Quantum Dots

Quantum gates in rare-earth-ion doped crystals

CHEM / BCMB 4190/6190/8189. Introductory NMR. Lecture 10

Polarised Nucleon Targets for Europe, 2nd meeting, Bochum 2005

13/02/2017. Overview. Magnetism. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) Electron Paramagnetic Resonance and Dynamic Nuclear Polarisation CH916

Magnetization Gradients, k-space and Molecular Diffusion. Magnetic field gradients, magnetization gratings and k-space

NMR: Formalism & Techniques

Controlling Spin Qubits in Quantum Dots. C. M. Marcus Harvard University

Deterministic Coherent Writing and Control of the Dark Exciton Spin using Short Single Optical Pulses

Suppression of the low-frequency decoherence by motion of the Bell-type states Andrey Vasenko

Quantum error correction on a hybrid spin system. Christoph Fischer, Andrea Rocchetto

Spins and spin-orbit coupling in semiconductors, metals, and nanostructures

General NMR basics. Solid State NMR workshop 2011: An introduction to Solid State NMR spectroscopy. # nuclei

Decoherence in Josephson and Spin Qubits. Lecture 3: 1/f noise, two-level systems

Atomic Tunneling Systems in Solids

Quantum Optics with Mesoscopic Systems II

Measuring errors in single-qubit rotations by pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance

Gamma-ray decay. Introduction to Nuclear Science. Simon Fraser University Spring NUCS 342 March 7, 2011

Towards quantum metrology with N00N states enabled by ensemble-cavity interaction. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

400 nm Solid State Qubits (1) Daniel Esteve GROUP. SPEC, CEA-Saclay

All-Silicon Quantum Computer Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 89, (2002) Kohei M. Itoh. Dept. Applied Physics, Keio University

Nuclear spin maser with a novel masing mechanism and its application to the search for an atomic EDM in 129 Xe

Optically-controlled controlled quantum dot spins for quantum computers

What is it all about?

Quantum Computing with Semiconductor Quantum Dots

Influence of hyperfine interaction on optical orientation in self-assembled InAs/GaAs quantum dots

Квантовые цепи и кубиты

Topological Quantum Computation with Majorana Zero Modes. Roman Lutchyn. Microsoft Station

Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Pål Erik Goa Associate Professor in Medical Imaging Dept. of Physics

From trapped ions to macroscopic quantum systems

Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy

NMR Dynamics and Relaxation

Decoherence in molecular magnets: Fe 8 and Mn 12

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Spin electric coupling and coherent quantum control of molecular nanomagnets

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 20 Sep 2013

S.A.Moiseev 1,2 *, and V.A.Skrebnev 2 **

ESR studies of low P-doped Si: T 1 measurement at high fields and DNP at low temperatures

NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE. The phenomenon of nuclear magnetic resonance will be used to study magnetic moments of nuclei.

Linear and nonlinear spectroscopy

Switchable resonant hyperpolarization transfer from phosphorus-31 nuclei to silicon-29 nuclei in natural silicon

Atomic magnetometers: new twists to the old story. Michael Romalis Princeton University

Chapter 8 Magnetic Resonance

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Transcription:

Electron spin coherence exceeding seconds in high-purity silicon Alexei M. Tyryshkin, Shinichi Tojo 2, John J. L. Morton 3, H. Riemann 4, N.V. Abrosimov 4, P. Becker 5, H.-J. Pohl 6, Thomas Schenkel 7, Michael L. W. Thewalt 8, Kohei M. Itoh 2, and Stephen A. Lyon Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University 2 School of Fundamental Science and Technology, Keio University 3 Dept. of Materials, and CAESR, Clarendon Laboratory, Dept. of Physics, Oxford University 4 Institute for Crystal Growth, IKZ 5 PTB Braunschweig 6 VITCON Projectconsult GmbH 7 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 8 Dept. Physics, Simon Fraser University

Outline Why long coherence? Spin echo method for T 2 measurements Phosphorus donors in high-purity 28 Si (only 50ppm 29 Si) Three decoherence processes identified (all related to donor-donor interactions) Upon suppressing these mechanisms, we demonstrate T 2 ~ 0 seconds for P donors in silicon

Why Long Coherence Times? Quantum bits (qubits) for quantum computation and quantum communication: Kane quantum computer (Nature, 998) Qubits as sensitive probes of the environment: Maze et al, Nature (2008) Expected field sensitivity ~ nt Basic physics of relaxation and dephasing of quantum states: Still many unsolved questions

Three Characteristic Relaxation Times B 0 ψ = cos θ 0 + sin θ e iφ T relaxation time (involves energy exchange with the environment) T 2 * dephasing time (not real decoherence since includes static field inhomogeneities) T 2 coherence time (irreversible dephasing) Typical arrangement: T > T 2 > T 2 *

Measuring T 2 : 2-Pulse (Hahn) Echo Experiment 90 0 80 0 echo 90 0 q 2 echo T T T T Hahn echo experiment 2-pulse echo experiment

Electron Spins in Solid State Devices Electron spins have a magnetic moment sensitive to magnetic field noise 3 Sources of noise: 3 Nuclear spins Defect spins Other (uncontrolled) donors 2 Ideal host material would have no other (uncontrolled) spins

Hahn Echo Decay Example: Magnetic Nuclei in Host Material.2 P donors in natural silicon Quantum dots in GaAs (Bluhm et al, Nat Physics, 20).0 0.8 T 2 = 0.6 ms 0.6 0.4 T 2 = 35 ms 0.2 0.0 0.0 0. 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 tau (ms) 4.7% of 29 Si nuclei (spin /2) Fast (non-exponential) decay 00% magnetic nuclei ( 69,7 Ga, 75 As, both spins 3/2) Ideal host would have no magnetic nuclei: Silicon, germanium, carbon, and helium are promising materials

Phosphorus Donors in Very Pure 28 Si kilogram 28 Si sphere for accurate Avogadro number Our samples (came from Avogadro project): 50 ppm 29 Si nuclei Donor densities *0 4 to 3*0 5 P/cm 3 Experimental details: X-band ESR (microwave 9.6 GHz, magnetic field 0.35 T) Spin polarization ~ 0% at 2 K Two-pulse echo experiment to measure T 2 90 0 q 2 echo T T

Relaxation Times, T and T 2 (s) Donor T 2 Depends on Donor Density 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0-0 -2 0-3 0-4 0-5 T 0 4 0 5 0 6 (Gordon, 958) (Feher, 959) 0 6 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 Temperature (K) 90 0 80 0 echo T T Instantaneous diffusion dominates T 2 at low temperatures

Hahn Echo Signal What Is Instantaneous Diffusion? (.20 4 P/cm 3, at 2.K) 90 0 q 2 echo T T 8 6 4 T 2 = 20 ms 2 0 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 Time (s) q 2 = 80 0 gives the best echo signal But also maximal instantaneous diffusion

Suppressing Instantaneous Diffusion Instantaneous diffusion maximized Instantaneous diffusion suppressed 90 0 80 0 echo 90 0 T T T 4 0 T echo Salikhov et al. (JMR, 98) Kurshev, Ichikawa (JMR, 992)

Hahn Echo Signal Hahn Echo Signal Instantaneous Diffusion Is Dominant T 2 Mechanism 8 (.20 4 P/cm 3, at 2.K).2.0 6 4 T 2 = 20 ms 0.8 0.6 0.4 T 2 = 0.45 s 2 0.2 0 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Time (s) 90 0 80 0 echo 90 0 T T T 4 0 T echo Instantaneous diffusion maximized Instantaneous diffusion suppressed

/T 2 (s - ) Extrapolating to Small Rotating Angles Removes Instantaneous Diffusion Effect 50 40 30 6K 4.8K.9K T 2 = 20 ms 90 0 80 0 echo T T T 2 = 0.7 s 20 0 90 0 T 22 0 T echo Slope = 49 s - corresponds to.2*0 4 P/cm 3 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8.0 sin 2 (q 2 /2) Salikhov et al. (JMR, 98) Kurshev, Ichikawa (JMR, 992)

Relaxation Times, T and T 2 (s) Extrapolated Donor T 2 (Instantaneous Diffusion Suppressed) 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 T Hahn echo T 2 Extrapolated T 2 0-0 -2 0-3 0-4 0 4 0 6 0 5 0 6 0-5 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 Temperature (K)

T 2 (s) Extrapolated T 2 at Different Donor Densities Flip-Flops Donor Flips (T ).2*0 4 T limit Above 8 K: Phonon-relaxation (T ) processes 0..2*0 5 Between 4 K and 8 K: Spectral diffusion by donor T -flips 0.0 3.3*0 5 Below 4 K: Spectral diffusion by donor flip-flops 2 4 6 8 Temperature (K) Solid fit curves: T 2 T T SD T ( T flips) SD( flip flops)

T -Induced Donor Flips Donor spins flip randomly on T timescale B 0 90 0 80 0 echo T T Random flips modulate the dipole fields and thus decohere the central spin Theory: Decay ~ exp time T SD 2 Donors: Characteristic time: T P T 2 SD Dipole interactions: Mims (Phys Rev 68, 370, 968) Hu and Hartmann (PRB 9,, 972)

2-Pulse Echo Signal Simulated Decays for Spectral Diffusion by Donor T -Induced Flips.0 Simulation parameters: 0.8 0.6 0.4 2.K [P] =.2*0 4 P/cm 3 T =.6 s (5.8 K) T = 8 s (4.7 K) 0.2 5.8K 4.7K 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8.0 Mims (PR 68, 370, 968): Time (s) Decay ~ exp time T SD 2 T = 300 s (2. K), where T P T 2 SD

Donor Flip-Flops B 0 90 0 80 0 echo T T Random flip-flops modulate the dipole fields causing decoherence of the central spin Theory: Salikhov et al. (JMR, 98) Kurshev, Ichikawa (JMR, 992) Witzel et al. (PRL, 20) Donors: Dipole interactions:

Donor Flip-Flops Can Be Suppressed Spin flip-flops are induced by dipole interactions: dipole interactions ~ 0 Hz at.20 4 P/cm 3 Flip-flop can only occur if Zeeman energies are close: (n n 2 ) < dipole interaction Flip-flops can be turned off: - By low temperature (our 2K is not low enough) - By very high magnetic field (our 0.35 T is not high enough) - By inhomogeneous broadening (e.g. external magnetic field gradient, 29 Si hyperfine broadening, etc.)

Echo Signal Intensity /T 2 (s - ) ESR Signal Intensity Suppressing Donor Flip-Flops by Magnetic Field Gradient 50.2 0 4 P/cm 3, at 2 K 4 ESR linewidth 40 2 30 90 deg 0 20 3482. 3482.4 3482.7 3483.0 3483.3 Magnetic Field (Gauss) 0.0 Echo decays q 2 = 90 deg 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8.0 sin 2 (q 2 /2) No gradient T 2 =.3 0. sec Gradient (0.3Hz/nm) T 2 = 2 7 sec 0.5 0.0 0.00 0.05 0.0 Time (s)

Summary Donor T 2 ~ 0 seconds in high-purity 28 Si Three order of magnitude longer than in other materials Comparable to 3 P nuclear T 2 = 50 s at.4 K (Mike Thewalt) Decoherence mechanisms: Above 8 K Phonon-relaxation (T ) processes Below 8 K Instantaneous diffusion Between 4-8 K Spectral diffusion by donor T -induced flips Below 4 K Spectral diffusion by donor flip-flops Still much T 2 is shorter than T ~ 2000 s at 2 K: The new 28 Si sample with lower donor densities (4 0 2 P/cm 3 ) hopefully provides more answers