Spatial variation in suspended sediment transport in the Murrumbidgee River, New South Wales, Australia

Similar documents
The contribution of subsoil to sediment yield in the Murrumbidgee River basin, New South Wales, Australia

Success of soil conservation works in reducing soil erosion rates and sediment yields in central eastern Australia

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

Sources of uncertainty in estimating suspended sediment load

Towards the design of a strategy for sampling suspended sediments in small headwater catchments

Calculating the suspended sediment load of the Dez River

The contribution of gully erosion to the sediment budget of the River Leira

Recent changes of suspended sediment yields in the Upper Yangtze River and its headwater tributaries

Sediment movement on hillslopes measured by caesium-137 and erosion pins

Suspended sediment yields of rivers in Turkey

Each basin is surrounded & defined by a drainage divide (high point from which water flows away) Channel initiation

DOMINANT DISCHARGE IN THE KOR RIVER, FARS PROVINCE, IRAN

Appendix O. Sediment Transport Modelling Technical Memorandum

Stream suspended sediment transport monitoring why, how and what is being measured?

CSIRO LAND and WATER. Sediment supply and transport in the Murrumbidgee and Namoi Rivers since European settlement

STREAM SYSTEMS and FLOODS

Precipitation Evaporation Infiltration Earth s Water and the Hydrologic Cycle. Runoff Transpiration

ADAM ŁAJCZAK Jan Kochanowski University, Institute of Geography, ul. Świętokrzyska 15, Kielce, Poland

Monitoring of suspended sediment concentration in discharge from regulated lakes in glacial deposits

GEOL 1121 Earth Processes and Environments

Tarbela Dam in Pakistan. Case study of reservoir sedimentation

Squaw Creek. General Information

Fluvial Systems Lab Environmental Geology Lab Dr. Johnson

Analysis of coarse sediment connectivity in semiarid river channels

Protecting Moreton Bay: How can we reduce sediment and nutrients loads by 50%? Jon Olley, Scott Wilkinson, Gary Caitcheon and Arthur Read

The impact of hill land clearance and urbanization on runoff and sediment yield of small catchments in Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

Recent Changes of Suspended Sediment Yields in the Upper Yangtze River and Its Headwater Tributaries

WATER ON AND UNDER GROUND. Objectives. The Hydrologic Cycle

Dynamics of Sediment Transport in the Mississippi River Basin: A Temporal Scaling Analysis

Influence of the timing of flood events on sediment yield in the north-western Algeria

Introduction Fluvial Processes in Small Southeastern Watersheds

7.3 Sediment Delivery Analysis

11/12/2014. Running Water. Introduction. Water on Earth. The Hydrologic Cycle. Fluid Flow

Gully Erosion Part 1 GULLY EROSION AND ITS CAUSES. Introduction. The mechanics of gully erosion

Rivers and Streams. Streams. Hydrologic Cycle. Drainage Basins and Divides. Colorado River Drainage Basin. Colorado Drainage Basins.

Sediment and nutrient transport and storage along the urban stream corridor

Wetland & Floodplain Functional Assessments and Mapping To Protect and Restore Riverine Systems in Vermont. Mike Kline and Laura Lapierre Vermont DEC

ES 105 Surface Processes I. Hydrologic cycle A. Distribution % in oceans 2. >3% surface water a. +99% surface water in glaciers b.

The effectiveness of check dams in controlling upstream channel stability in northeastern Taiwan

A distributed runoff model for flood prediction in ungauged basins

Modeling Great Britain s Flood Defenses. Flood Defense in Great Britain. By Dr. Yizhong Qu

Sediment Deposition LET THE RIVER RUN T E A C H E R. Activity Overview. Activity at a Glance. Time Required. Level of Complexity.

5/4/2017 Fountain Creek. Gage Analysis. Homework 6. Clifton, Cundiff, Pour, Queen, and Zey CIVE 717

3/3/2013. The hydro cycle water returns from the sea. All "toilet to tap." Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

Diego Burgos. Geology 394. Advisors: Dr. Prestegaard. Phillip Goodling

River Response. Sediment Water Wood. Confinement. Bank material. Channel morphology. Valley slope. Riparian vegetation.

Variation of suspended sediment yields around New Zealand: the relative importance of rainfall and geology

Which map shows the stream drainage pattern that most likely formed on the surface of this volcano? A) B)

Illinois State Water Survey Division

Technical Memorandum No

Variability in discharge, stream power, and particlesize distributions in ephemeral-stream channel systems

Water Supply Conditions and Outlook October 1, 2018

Sedimentation in the Nile River

Erosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.

Summary. Streams and Drainage Systems

Strategies for managing sediment in dams. Iwona Conlan Consultant to IKMP, MRCS

Dan Miller + Kelly Burnett, Kelly Christiansen, Sharon Clarke, Lee Benda. GOAL Predict Channel Characteristics in Space and Time

Decoupling of sediment sources in large river basins

SCOPE OF PRESENTATION STREAM DYNAMICS, CHANNEL RESTORATION PLANS, & SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ANALYSES IN RELATION TO RESTORATION PLANS

Suspended Sediment and Bedload Budgets for the Western Port Bay Basin

low turbidity high turbidity

2. PRESENT CONDITION OF THE RESERVOIR 2.1 View of Wonogiri Reservoir (1/3)

EFFICIENCY OF THE INTEGRATED RESERVOIR OPERATION FOR FLOOD CONTROL IN THE UPPER TONE RIVER OF JAPAN CONSIDERING SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF RAINFALL

Techniques for Targeting Protection and Rehabilitation of Riparian Vegetation In the Middle and Upper Murrumbidgee Catchment

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions. Section Instructions

Assessment of Lake Forest Lake Sediment Trapping Efficiency and Capacity. Marlon R. Cook Groundwater Assessment Program Geological Survey of Alabama

Upper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California

H Y D R O L O G Y I R R I G A T I O N C E

Continuing Education Associated with Maintaining CPESC and CESSWI Certification

Geog Lecture 19

Overview of fluvial and geotechnical processes for TMDL assessment

May 7, Roger Leventhal, P.E. Marin County Public Works Laurel Collins Watershed Sciences

Influence of the Major Drainages to the Mississippi River and Implications for System Level Management

Platte River Flow and Sediment Transport Between North Platte and Grand Island, Nebraska ( )

Final Report. Prepared for. American Rivers, California Trout, Friends of the River and Trout Unlimited

Impact of Dam and Weirs on Cross-Sectional Characteristics of Urmodi Channel, Maharashtra: An Approach to Geoinformatics

1. Evaluation of Flow Regime in the Upper Reaches of Streams Using the Stochastic Flow Duration Curve

Floods Lecture #21 20

Laboratory Exercise #4 Geologic Surface Processes in Dry Lands

Modelling runoff from large glacierized basins in the Karakoram Himalaya using remote sensing of the transient snowline

Unregulated Diversions Water Outlook for Melbourne Water Licence Holders

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

Earth Science Chapter 6 Section 2 Review

Souris River Basin Spring Runoff Outlook As of March 1, 2019

Fluvial Processes In Dryland Rivers

State Water Survey Division SURFACE WATER SECTION

Climate Adaptation Challenges for Boston s Water and Sewer Systems

Summary of Hydraulic and Sediment-transport. Analysis of Residual Sediment: Alternatives for the San Clemente Dam Removal/Retrofit Project,

Annex 29. Sediment Transport with the Danube River Flow and Sedimentation Rates along the Danube- Black Sea Navigation Route

FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE, DEHRADUN

SPECIFIC DEGRADATION AND RESERVOIR SEDIMENTATION. By Renee Vandermause & Chun-Yao Yang

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

Altered morphodynamics in tidallyinfluenced rivers: re-thinking catchment management, flood risk & material fluxes

9. PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION AND PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD

Fresh Water: Streams, Lakes Groundwater & Wetlands

River floodplain regime and stratigraphy. Drs. Nanette C. Kingma.

mountain rivers fixed channel boundaries (bedrock banks and bed) high transport capacity low storage input output

Landslides, degradation and erosion in Hong Kong

Critical assessment and addressed challenges in deploying innovative technologies in small-scale irrigation scheme in Uganda

Transcription:

Variability in Stream Erosion and Sediment Transport (Proceedings of the Canberra Symposium, December 1994). IAHS Publ. no. 224, 1994. 241 Spatial variation in suspended sediment transport in the Murrumbidgee River, New South Wales, Australia L. J. OLIVE Department of Geography and Oceanography, Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia J. M. OLLEY, A. S. MURRAY & P. J. WALLBRINK Division of Water Resources, CSIRO, PO Box 1666, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia Abstract The Murrumbidgee is a large regulated river within the Murray-Darling basin. Spatial variation in suspended sediment transport is examined based on turbidity records for six stations along a 1200 km reach of the river. Transport is dominated by flood events. The downstream patterns of suspended sediment concentrations and loads show an increase to Wagga Wagga and then a significant decrease in the lower section of the river. The upstream tributaries are the major source of sediment which is only transported a short distance in the trunk stream to be deposited on the flood plain, especially between Wagga Wagga and Narrandera. Some additional sediment is lost to irrigation abstractions. Less than 20% of the sediment load at Wagga Wagga is delivered to the Murray River. INTRODUCTION Australian rivers are noted for their low sediment yields and high variability in sediment transport, especially the rivers of Australia's largest basin the Murray-Darling. Most studies of Australian rivers have examined basins at one location and have thus characterized temporal variation. Spatial variability has been considered in some parts of the Murray-Darling basin (Olive & Rieger, 1986) but this was based on limited data of doubtful accuracy. Also, Thorns & Walker (1991) have reported on spatial trends in sediment transport in the Murray River. In this paper spatial variability is examined along a 1200 km reach of the Murrumbidgee River. THE MURRUMBIDGEE BASIN The Murrumbidgee River forms part of the Murray-Darling basin and drains an area of approximately 82 000 km 2 (Fig. 1). The river rises in the Snowy Mountains and flows through undulating terrain with a well defined valley to Wagga Wagga. Downstream of Wagga Wagga there is a decrease in relief and the gradient is extremely low as it crosses the Riverine and Hay Plains. There is a flood plain 1 to 2 km wide between Gundagai and Wagga Wagga which broadens considerably between Wagga Wagga and Narrandera to widths of 5 to 20 km. Below Narrandera the river is highly sinuous to its junction with the Murray River. The study area extends from Burrinjuck and Blowering Dams

242 L. J. Olive et al. ^1 Fig. 1 The Murrumbidgee basin. downstream to the Murray junction. The major tributaries join the river between the storages and the area around Wagga Wagga. Downstream of Wagga Wagga there are a number of distributaries, some of which leave the Murrumbidgee system and enter the Murray River. The only major tributary in the lower basin is the Lachlan River which drains a large basin and joins the Murrumbidgee above Balranald. The Lachlan passes through an extensive area of low gradient marshes above the junction where its flow is dissipated, thus it only contributes flow to the Murrumbidgee during infrequent large flood events. There was no significant contribution from the Lachlan during the period reported in this paper. The upper part of the basin is predominantly used for grazing, while the more undulating area around Wagga Wagga is a major grain producing area. Extensive grazing is widespread in the Riverine and Hay Plains, with intensive cropping in the irrigation areas. There is a strong rainfall gradient across the basin. Average annual totals vary from 1600 mm in the Snowy Mountains to 300 mm at Balranald (Fig. 1). Most of the flow in the study reach is derived from the storage reservoirs and the upstream tributaries. Discharge is a maximum at Wagga Wagga while downstream the river enters a semi-arid area and there is a progressive decrease in flow. The river has been increasingly regulated during this century to provide irrigation water. There are two large storage reservoirs, Burrinjuck on the Murrumbidgee and Blowering on the Tumut River (Fig. 1) with a series of low diversion weirs downstream. Major extractions occur at Berembed Weir and Gogelderie Weir with smaller extractions throughout the downstream sections. Prior to regulation, flow regimes exhibited winter maximums, but flows were highly variable. Regulation has altered the flow to a summer dominated regime when irrigation demands are greatest. The impact of regulation on flood events varies according to their magnitude. The occurrence of small and moderate floods has been reduced as flow from the upper basin can be contained by the storage reservoirs (Page, 1988). The hydrologie response for larger events remains similar to the pre-regulation regime, especially in the mid and lower river where weir gates are lifted during these events.

THE DATA Spatial variation in suspended sediment transport in the Murrumbidgee River 243 A good discharge record is available from a network of continuous gauging stations. However, the sediment record is far less detailed and samples are only taken at 4 to 6 weekly intervals. This is not sufficient to determine changes in sediment concentration which can occur over intervals of several days. An alternative data base has been used, based on turbidity observations made at water treatment plants at six towns which derive their water supply from the river (Fig. 1). Most plants were established in the late 1980s but longer records do exist up to a maximum of 44 years at Wagga Wagga. The river water is generally too turbid for direct domestic use and turbidity is measured to determine treatment dose rates for sediment removal. Samples are taken from the water supply inlet at a fixed point in the section. These were found to be representative of the cross-sectional average as sediment was well mixed. Readings are usually taken daily, but during flood events when turbidity changes more quickly additional observations are made. Hach 2100A turbidity meters were used at all stations except for Wagga Wagga, where observations were made by visual comparison with a set of formazine standards. A relationship between turbidity and suspended sediment concentration has been established at each location by sampling a wide range of turbidities and sediment concentrations over a three year period. These were all significant to the/? = 0.05 level. Most storm events have a duration of at least 2 to 3 days so, while the daily sample may underestimate actual peak values, turbidity events will not be completely missed (Figs 2 and 3). Detailed sampling of a flood in July 1991 at Narrandera revealed only minimal information loss resulting from the use of daily samples. However this loss may be 200 DAILY DISCHARGE ~~jf JAJ SUSPENDED SOLIDS 100-800- 400- UULL^ klhl i i. jkk,..ill LJ4 100' LOAD JiL JaL Ai_ JL U.1W VA^K., U...J. 1 l*ju. 1989 1990 1991 1992 Fig. 2 Murrumbidgee River at Wagga Wagga - discharge and sediment 1989-1992.

244 L. J. Olive et al. 600 JUGIONG 600' TUMUT, h.?. «JV Jk_i^ 600' GUNDAGA! 0. 600' WAGGA WAGGA ="=T- _ = I ' I r 0' 6001 HAY 0. 600- BALRANALD M M J J A S 1991 Fig. 3 Murrumbidgee River suspended sediment concentrations 1991 0 N greater upstream where sediment response times are shorter. The loss of resolution will decrease downstream, where response patterns are attenuated and changes occur less rapidly. A second source of data was a detailed sampling of a flood event at Narrandera in 1991. Samples were obtained every six hours by pumping from a fixed point. Crosssectional sampling during the event showed that the fixed point sample was representative. In all cases, suspended sediment concentrations were determined using 0.45 jum membrane filters. RESULTS Sediment concentrations There is great variation in sediment concentrations. This is evident in the 1989 to 1992 results for Wagga Wagga (Fig. 2) which show that while flow is dominated by two large flood events in 1989 and 1991, there are many peaks in suspended sediment concentration often associated with much smaller flow events. Variations in concentration for all stations throughout the system during 1991 are shown in Fig. 3. A number of general patterns can be observed. Low flow

Spatial variation in suspended sediment transport in the Murrumbidgee River 245 concentrations increase downstream, as shown in Fig. 4, which shows the frequency ranking of sediment concentration observations by percentiles (10, 50 (median) and 90). This observation is supported by four low flow samplings carried out along the length of the river over a two year period by Murray et al. (1993) and the results of Bek & Robinson (1991). Storm responses are more peaked and high sediment concentrations are of shorter duration at Tumut on the Tumut River than those on the Murrumbidgee River. On the Murrumbidgee, sediment response peakedness increases downstream to Wagga Wagga and then decreases significantly below there with increasing attenuation of the storm responses. In contrast to the low flow pattern, concentrations increase from the upstream stations to Wagga Wagga then decrease considerably in the two downstream stations, as shown in the 90 percentile values in Fig. 4. At Jugiong the more pronounced peaks were associated with high flows in Jugiong Creek, which is the only significant tributary between Jugiong and Burrinjuck Reservoir. In the lower river, at Hay and Balranald, there were no concentration peaks which were not also present at Wagga Wagga, suggesting that events in the downstream section of the basin do not contribute significantly (Murray et al., 1993). 1,,, GUNDAGAI WAGGA HAY BALRANALD WAGGA Fig. 4 Sediment concentration frequency ranking by percentile. Sediment loads Sediment loads have been calculated, based on the data for 1990 and 1991. They are determined using the total daily discharge and the suspended sediment concentrations from daily turbidity readings. Inevitably errors will result from the use of a single daily turbidity value, especially during flood events when sediment concentration is changing more rapidly. The magnitude of these errors was tested during the 1991 flood at Narrandera, and was relatively small. Detailed load results are presented for Wagga Wagga for the period 1989 to 1992 (Fig. 2) and show the dominance of storm events in the transport of sediment loads. Fig. 2 reveals that while there are a relatively large number of high sediment concentration peaks, the load exhibits fewer peaks. Many of the sediment concentration peaks were associated with minor discharge events where flow was derived from tributary runoff and the resulting mass of sediment transport was relatively small. During the four year

246 L. J. Olive et al. period, shown transport was dominated by the large flood in July 1991, which had a return period of approximately 10 years. During this flood, approximately 220 0001 of sediment were transported at Wagga Wagga, 37 % of the long term average annual load of 600 000 t. ANNUAL SEDIMENT LOAD DISCHARGE 0 2 4 tonnes x 10 I I I - dm -GUNDAGAI 0 2 4 ML x 10 BURRINJUCK, BLOWERING Jlf -HAY (b) FLOOD JULY-AUGUST 1991 V 0 1 2 tonnes x 10 i 1 I *m -GUNDAGAI WAGGA WAGGA^ 0 4 8 ML x 10 I I I 8URRINJUCK TUMUT NARRANDERA iîsb HAY r^ WAGGA WAGGA- BALRANALD- BALRANALD- V Fig. 5 Murrumbidgee River sediment budgets (a) annual sediment loads (b) sediment loads for flood July-August 1991.

Spatial variation in suspended sediment transport in the Murrumbidgee River 247 Downstream trends in sediment load and discharge are shown in the annual sediment budget and flows for the trunk stream based on 1990 and 1991 data (Fig. 5(a)). Although the value for Wagga Wagga was close to the long term average, care must be taken with these results because sediment transport in the Murrumbidgee is highly variable and two years of record may not accurately characterize longer term trends (Olive & Rieger, 1992). A significant proportion of the flow was generated by releases from the two storage reservoirs accounting for approximately 70-75% of the flow at Wagga Wagga. With tributary contributions, discharge increased steadily downstream to reach a maximum at Wagga Wagga. Below Wagga Wagga there was a large decrease in discharge due to extraction of irrigation water and transmission losses. Flow at Hay and Balranald was approximately 50% and 35% respectively of that at Wagga Wagga. Sediment loads cannot be calculated for the upstream station at Jugiong as there are no discharge data. However, the data available for Burrinjuck Dam and Jugiong Creek suggests that most of the load at Jugiong was derived from Jugiong Creek. The load for the Tumut River at Tumut was approximately 13 400 t year" 1 with a discharge of 2 200 000 Ml year" 1. By Gundagai the annual load was 380 000 t year" 1. These results indicate that the storage reservoirs were not significant sources of sediment. The load increased downstream to 580 000 t year" 1 at Wagga Wagga. It then decreased significantly downstream to approximately 180 000 t year" 1 at Hay and 115 000 t year" 1 at Balranald. Less than 20% of the sediment transported through Wagga Wagga was delivered by the Murrumbidgee to the Murray River. Some of the decrease in load was associated with irrigation abstractions. The magnitude of this loss cannot be accurately calculated but an approximate figure can be derived. During the irrigation season approximately 75% of the water passing Wagga Wagga was abstracted. Assuming that the same proportion of load was lost, then over the two years considered, the average loss of sediment from the river was approximately 105 000 t year" 1 - This is 26% of the decrease between Wagga Wagga and Hay. The abstractions involve a significant quantity of water, most of which comes from dam releases where sediment concentrations in the river are low. Conversely, during significant storm events, when most of the sediment was transported, there was little demand for irrigation water. This is especially so in winter and early spring, which is the most common period for flood events. A sediment budget has been determined for the large flood in July-August 1991 (Fig. 5(b)) and includes data from detailed sampling at Narrandera (Murray et al., 1993). A more thorough analysis of this flood is given in Olive et al. (submitted). This flood made up a significant portion of the annual budget (Fig. 5(a)). Approximately 60% of the flow at Gundagai was accounted for by release from Burrinjuck Dam with the remainder from the tributaries. Total discharge was similar from Gundagai to Wagga Wagga, while below Wagga Wagga there was a decrease in flow. Narrandera had 83% of the Wagga Wagga flow, Hay 50% and Balranald 20%. The sediment load increased to Wagga Wagga, but then decreased significantly to Narrandera, where it was approximately 37% of the Wagga Wagga load. Smaller decreases occurred further downstream, with Hay having 20% and Balranald 9% of the Wagga Wagga load. A similar pattern was observed in a smaller flood generated by a Blowering Reservoir release and tributary runoff in October-November 1992.

248 L. J. Olive et al. DISCUSSION The spatial variations in both sediment concentrations and loads show a consistent pattern. Both are relatively low in the upper section immediately below the storage reservoirs, increase progressively downstream to Wagga Wagga and then decrease significantly below Wagga Wagga. The magnitude of the decrease is much greater than the corresponding decrease in river discharge. This pattern is also evident during the flood event of July-August 1991, but the relative magnitude of the decrease of sediment concentration and load is greater than the annual average trends. In contrast, the low flow sediment concentration pattern shows a progressive downstream increase. The section above Wagga Wagga, where sediment increases, corresponds to the region with all the major tributaries, is steeper and drains agricultural land. Downstream, where sediment decreased, there are few tributaries and relief is much less. This pattern is in direct contrast to the results of Thorns & Walker (1991) for the adjacent Murray River, a basin with similar topography but with tributaries throughout the reach studied. Their results show a progressive downstream increase in sediment load. In addition, the Murrumbidgee at Wagga Wagga has more than double the annual load of the highest loads reported in the Murray but the total discharges are very similar. However, care must be taken with this comparison, because Thorns and Walker used sediment rating curves to estimate loads and these are known to commonly underestimate loads (Walling & Webb, 1988). The Murrumbidgee pattern is consistent with other results from the Murray-Darling basin (Olive & Rieger, 1986). This pattern of spatial variation is the result of the limited area of sediment sources and the pattern of deposition. The evidence suggests that the two storage reservoirs do not contribute a large amount of sediment to the river. Sediment loads at Tumut, downstream of Blowering Reservoir, are low and the response at Jugiong indicates that the majority of sediment passing there is not derived from Burrinjuck Reservoir. Tributary streams appear to be the major source of sediment in the reach from the reservoirs to Wagga Wagga. In this reach, the trunk channel has remained relatively stable over the past 50 years (Murray et al., 1993) and so the sediment can only come from the tributaries. The precise source within these basins has not been determined at present. All sediment sampled in the river system has measurable 137 Cs suggesting that there is a top soil component and 210 Pb/ 137 Cs ratios indicate some element of surface material (Murray et al, 1993). However, the 137 Cs concentrations are relatively low, indicating a significant subsurface source. Wasson (this volume) concludes, that within Murray-Darling basin a large part of the variance of sediment yield in gullied basins can be accounted for by drainage density, and gullies and channel erosion in small basins are a significant source. In the Murrumbidgee tributary area such gullies, cut into the almost ubiquitous valley infill deposits, are common. Research is continuing to establish the sediment sources within the tributaries. The decrease in sediment load below Wagga Wagga is the result of two factors. Sediment loss associated with irrigation abstraction accounts for approximately 25 % of the decrease, considerably less than the proportion of flow abstracted. The most important decrease in sediment is through deposition of sediment on the flood plain. Below Wagga Wagga there is a considerable decrease in gradient with a resulting loss in energy. Also, there is a major widening of the flood plain from 1 to 2 km above Wagga Wagga to 5 to 20 km between Wagga Wagga and Narrandera. The detailed

Spatial variation in suspended sediment transport in the Murrumbidgee River 249 results for the 1991 flood indicate that majority of the deposition occurs in the reach between Wagga Wagga and Narrandera, where approximately 60% of the load is lost, with continuing but reduced deposition downstream. Deposition rates for this flood were calculated as 216 t km" 2 on the flood plain in the Wagga Wagga-Narrandera reach, and 40 t km" 2 for the Narrandera-Hay reach (Olive et al., submitted). CONCLUSIONS The Murrumbidgee River shows considerable spatial variation in the transport of sediment through the 1200 km reach studied. Sediment concentrations show two patterns: (a) a downstream increase in concentrations during periods of low flow; (b) an increase downstream to Wagga Wagga, then a decrease below Wagga Wagga during flood events. The flood sediment loads have a similar pattern to the flood concentrations. The annual sediment loads are dominated by flood sediment transport. Most of the sediment is generated in a limited area from the tributaries above Wagga Wagga. It is then transported only a short distance to be deposited on the flood plain between Wagga Wagga and Narrandera, with deposition continuing downstream. Sediment transport is minimal over much of the lower low energy semi-arid section. While this pattern differs from that reported by Thorns & Walker (1991), it is consistent with the other research in the Murray-Darling basin, suggesting a very inefficient delivery of sediment (Olive & Rieger, 1986). REFERENCES Bek, P. & Robinson, G. (1991} Sweet Water or Bitter Legacy, State of the Rivers - Water Quality in New South Wales. Dept Water Resources, New South Wales, Sydney. Murray, A. S., Olive, L. J., Oliey, J. M., Caitcheon, G. G., Wasson, R. J. & Wallbrink, P. J. (1993) Tracing the source of suspended sediment in the Murrumbidgee River, Australia. In: Tracers in Hydrology (ed. by N. E. Peters, E. Hoehn, Ch. Leibundgut, N. Tase & D. E. Walling) (Proc. Yokohama Symp., July 1993), 293-302. IAHS Publ. no. 215. Olive, L. J. & Rieger, W. A. (1986) Low Australian sedimentyields a question of inefficientdelivery. In: Drainage Basin Sediment Delivery (ed. by R. F. Hadley) (Proc. Albuquerque Symp., August 1986), 355-364. IAHS Publ. no. 159. Olive, L. J. & Rieger, W. A. (1992) Stream suspended sediment transport monitoring - why, how and what is being measured? In: Erosion and Sediment Transport Monitoring Programmes in River Basins (ed. by J. Bogen, D. E. Walling & T. Day) (Proc. Oslo Symp., August 1992), 245-254. IAHS Publ. no. 210. Olive, L. J., Murray, A. S., Olley, J. M. & Wallbrink, P. J. (submitted) Patterns of sediment transport during floods in the Murrumbidgee River system, NSW. Z. Geomorphol. Supplement. Page, K. J. (1988) Bankfull discharge frequency forthe Murrumbidgee River.New South Wales. In: Fluvial Geomorphology of Australia (ed. by R. F. Warner), 267-282. Academic Press, Sydney. Thorns, M. C. & Walker, K. F. (1991) Sediment transport in a regulated semi-arid river: the River Murray, Australia. In: Aquatic Ecosystems in Semi-arid Regions: Implications for Resource Management (ed. by R. D. Roberts & M. L. Bothwell), 239-250. NHRI Symposium Series 7, Environment Canada, Saskatoon. Walling, D. E. &Webb, B. W. (1988) The reliability of rating curve estimates of suspended sediment yield: some further comments. In: SedimentBudgets (ed. bym. P. Bordas &D. E. Walling) (Proc. Porto Alegre Symp., December 1988), 337-350. IAHS Pub. no. 174. Wasson, R. J. (1994) Annual and decadal variation of sediment yield in Australia, and some global comparisons. In: Variability in Stream Erosion and Sediment Transport (ed. by L. J. Olive, R. J. Loughran & J. A. Kesby) (Proc. Canberra Symp., December 1994). IAHS Publ. no. 224 (this volume).