Handling Non-Convexities: Entrepreneurship and Financial Frictions

Similar documents
Productivity Losses from Financial Frictions: Can Self-financing Undo Capital Misallocation?

Some applications of Mean Field Games

Lecture 8. The Workhorse Model of Income and Wealth Distribution in Macroeconomics. ECO 521: Advanced Macroeconomics I.

Equilibrium Conditions and Algorithm for Numerical Solution of Kaplan, Moll and Violante (2017) HANK Model.

Mean Field Games in Economics Part I

(a) Write down the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) Equation in the dynamic programming

Heterogeneous Agent Models in Continuous Time Part I

1 The Basic RBC Model

Inequality and Financial Development: A Power-Law Kuznets Curve

Hopenhayn Model in Continuous Time

problem. max Both k (0) and h (0) are given at time 0. (a) Write down the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) Equation in the dynamic programming

When Inequality Matters for Macro and Macro Matters for Inequality

Online Appendix I: Wealth Inequality in the Standard Neoclassical Growth Model

When Inequality Matters for Macro and Macro Matters for Inequality

Do Financial Factors Drive Aggregate Productivity? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing Establishments

Lecture 6: Competitive Equilibrium in the Growth Model (II)

Lectures 7 and 8. The Workhorse Model of Income and Wealth Distribution in Macroeconomics. Distributional Macroeconomics. Part II of ECON 2149

Lecture XI. Approximating the Invariant Distribution

2. What is the fraction of aggregate savings due to the precautionary motive? (These two questions are analyzed in the paper by Ayiagari)

Labor-Market Matching with Precautionary Savings

Macroeconomics IV Problem Set I

The Dynamics of Inequality

Part A: Answer question A1 (required), plus either question A2 or A3.

Heterogeneous Agent Models in Continuous Time Part I

Sufficient Statistics for Top End Wealth Inequality

ECON 581: Growth with Overlapping Generations. Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko

Practice Questions for Mid-Term I. Question 1: Consider the Cobb-Douglas production function in intensive form:

Ramsey Cass Koopmans Model (1): Setup of the Model and Competitive Equilibrium Path

Neoclassical Growth Model: I

Business Failure and Labour Market Fluctuations

Lecture 1: Basic Models of Growth

Interest Rate Liberalization and Capital Misallocation 1

Cross-Country Differences in Productivity: The Role of Allocation and Selection

Economics 210B Due: September 16, Problem Set 10. s.t. k t+1 = R(k t c t ) for all t 0, and k 0 given, lim. and

Heterogeneous Agent Models: I

Lecture 2 The Centralized Economy

Permanent Income Hypothesis Intro to the Ramsey Model

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Questions and Answers Econ 8712

Micro Data for Macro Models Topic 4: Firm Lifecycle

Slow Convergence in Economies with Organization Capital

Lecture 2: Firms, Jobs and Policy

Lecture 7: Stopping Time Problems Firm Size Distribution

Equilibrium Conditions for the Simple New Keynesian Model

Government The government faces an exogenous sequence {g t } t=0

Optimal Simple And Implementable Monetary and Fiscal Rules

CREDIT SEARCH AND CREDIT CYCLES

Advanced Macroeconomics

Small Open Economy RBC Model Uribe, Chapter 4

1 Bewley Economies with Aggregate Uncertainty

Foundation of (virtually) all DSGE models (e.g., RBC model) is Solow growth model

The Ramsey Model. (Lecture Note, Advanced Macroeconomics, Thomas Steger, SS 2013)

Greenwood, Sanchez, and Wang (2013), Quantifying the Impact of Financial Development on Economic Development

PROPERTY RIGHTS IN GROWTH THEORY

Lecture 1: Overview, Hamiltonians and Phase Diagrams. ECO 521: Advanced Macroeconomics I. Benjamin Moll. Princeton University, Fall

Lecture 15. Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model. Randall Romero Aguilar, PhD I Semestre 2017 Last updated: July 3, 2017

The Lucas Imperfect Information Model

Advanced Macroeconomics

Monetary Economics: Solutions Problem Set 1

The Natural Rate of Interest and its Usefulness for Monetary Policy

HOMEWORK #3 This homework assignment is due at NOON on Friday, November 17 in Marnix Amand s mailbox.

Lecture 12. Estimation of Heterogeneous Agent Models. ECO 521: Advanced Macroeconomics I. Benjamin Moll. Princeton University, Fall

Equilibrium in a Production Economy

Theoretical premises of the Keynesian approach

Mean Field Games in Economics Part II

1 Two elementary results on aggregation of technologies and preferences

Simulating Aggregate Dynamics of Buffer-Stock Savings Models using the Permanent-Income-Neutral Measure

Robust Comparative Statics of Non-monotone Shocks in Large Aggregative Games

Growth Theory: Review

Taxing capital along the transition - Not a bad idea after all?

Endogenous information acquisition

Chaotic Price Dynamics, Increasing Returns & the Phillips Curve. by Graciela Chichilnisky, Columbia University Geoffrey Heal, Columbia Business School

Lecture 2. (1) Aggregation (2) Permanent Income Hypothesis. Erick Sager. September 14, 2015

Modelling Czech and Slovak labour markets: A DSGE model with labour frictions

Assumption 5. The technology is represented by a production function, F : R 3 + R +, F (K t, N t, A t )

Lecture 3: Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equations. Distributional Macroeconomics. Benjamin Moll. Part II of ECON Harvard University, Spring

Cointegration and the Ramsey Model

Adverse Selection, Risk Sharing and Business Cycles

A Global Economy-Climate Model with High Regional Resolution

Lecture 5: Competitive Equilibrium in the Growth Model

Economic Growth: Lecture 8, Overlapping Generations

Accounting for Business Cycles

A simple macro dynamic model with endogenous saving rate: the representative agent model

Economic Growth (Continued) The Ramsey-Cass-Koopmans Model. 1 Literature. Ramsey (1928) Cass (1965) and Koopmans (1965) 2 Households (Preferences)

Interest-Rate Liberalization and Capital Misallocations

Economic Growth: Lecture 13, Stochastic Growth

Chapter 11 The Stochastic Growth Model and Aggregate Fluctuations

Optimal Insurance of Search Risk

Technical Appendix. The Steady State

General Equilibrium with Incomplete Markets

The Basic New Keynesian Model, the Labor Market and Sticky Wages

Signaling Effects of Monetary Policy

Dynamic Bertrand and Cournot Competition

Bequest Motives, Estate Taxes, and Wealth Distributions in Becker-Tomes Models with Investment Risk

Volume 30, Issue 3. Ramsey Fiscal Policy and Endogenous Growth: A Comment. Jenn-hong Tang Department of Economics, National Tsing-Hua University

Growth Theory: Review

INTEREST-RATE LIBERALIZATION AND CAPITAL MISALLOCATIONS. I. Introduction

A t = B A F (φ A t K t, N A t X t ) S t = B S F (φ S t K t, N S t X t ) M t + δk + K = B M F (φ M t K t, N M t X t )

Optimal Monetary Policy with Informational Frictions

Public Economics The Macroeconomic Perspective Chapter 2: The Ramsey Model. Burkhard Heer University of Augsburg, Germany

Endogenous Growth: AK Model

Transcription:

Handling Non-Convexities: Entrepreneurship and Financial Frictions Benjamin Moll Model Setup This note describes a model of entrepreneurship and financial frictions, similar to that in Buera and Shin () and Cagetti and De Nardi (6). In particular, occupational choice in combination with financial friction introduces a non-convexity in individuals optimization problems. We also introduce a second additional non-convexity, namely a choice between operating two technologies. Achdou et al. () consider a version with aggregate shocks and examine its business cycle implications s(here we focus on the model with idiosyncratic shocks only). Individuals preferences E e ρt u(c t )dt Workers earn labor income wz θ where θ Entrepreneurs choose technology, maximize profits Two technologies productive (p) and unproductive (u) y u = F u (z, k, l) = zb u k α l β y p = F p (z, k, l) = zb p ((k f k ) + ) α ((l f l ) + ) β B p > B u, but per-period overhead cost f k, f l Notation: for any scalar x, x + = max{x, } F p non-concave in k and l z: idiosyncratic shock, diffusion process Collateral constraints k λa, λ.

Income maximization: occupation and technology choice Individuals solve M(a, z, A; w, r) = max{wz θ, Π u (a, z, A; w, r), Π p (a, z, A; w, r)} Π j (a, z, A; w, r) = max k λa F j(z, A, k, l) (r + δ)k wl, j = p, u. max {c t} E e ρt u(c t )dt s.t. da t = [M(a t, z t, A t ; w t, r t ) + r t a t c t ]dt dz t = µ(z t )dt + σ(z t )dw t a t Optimal capital and labor choices corresponding to the productive technology k p (a, z; w, r) = min { λa, (zab p ) α β ( ) βzabp β l p (a, z; w, r) = kp (a, z; w, r) α β w ( ) β ( ) β } α α β β α β + fk r + δ w and a similar expression for optimal capital and labor choices corresponding to the unproductive technology. + fl Representative firm Y c = F c (A, K c, L c ) = AB c K η c L η c, Equilibrium Conditions Individual optimization and evolution of distribution ρv(a, z, t) = max c u(c) + a v(a, z, t)[m(a, z; w(t), r(t)) + r(t)a c] + z v(a, z, t)µ(z) + zzv(a, z, t)σ (z) + t v(a, z, t) () t g(a, z, t) = a [s(a, z, t)g(a, z, t)] z [µ(z)g(a, z, t)] + zz[σ (z)g(a, z, t)], () s(a, z, t) =M(a, z; w(t), r(t)) + r(t)a c(a, z, t) ()

Public firms r(t) = K F c (A, K c (t), L c (t)) δ, w(t) = L F c (A, K c (t), L c (t)) () Capital market clearing: K c (t)+ + = k u (a, z; w(t), r(t)) {Πu>max{Π p,wz θ }} k p (a, z; w(t), r(t)) {Πp>max{Π u,wz θ }} a () Labor market clearing: L c (t)+ + = l u (a, z; w(t), r(t)) {Πu>max{Π p,wz θ }} l p (a, z; w(t), r(t)) {Πp>max{Π u,wz θ }} z θ {wz θ >max{π u,π p}} (6) Given initial condition g (a, z), the two PDEs (), () together with () and the equilibrium conditions (), () and (6) fully characterize equilibrium. Numerical Solution The algorithm for solving the HJB equation () and the Kolmogorov Forward equation () are nearly identical to that used for solving the Huggett model with a diffusion process described in section here http://www.princeton.edu/~moll/hactproject/hact_ Numerical_Appendix.pdf. The algorithm is then a simple bisection algorithm on the equilibrium interest rate.. Algorithm for Steady State Use a bisection algorithm for r min r r max. Given an initial guesses r for l =,,,... follow. given r l, find ξ l = K c /L c from (). given ξ l find w from ()

. given r l and w l, solve the HJB equation. find K c,l from (). Compute L c,l = K c,l /ξ l and compute excess labor demand D l =L c (t) + l u (a, z; w(t), r(t)) {Πu>max{Π p,wz θ }} + l p (a, z; w(t), r(t)) {Πp>max{Π u,wz θ }} z θ {wz θ >max{π u,π p}} 6. Update r l : if D l >, choose r l+ < r l and vice versa. Results Figure plots the saving and consumption policy functions. The policy functions can be non-monotonic. Figure plots the wealth distribution. The wealth distribution has a fat right tail as in Cagetti and De Nardi (6). Saving s(a, z) 7 6 ( a) Saving, with Entrepreneurship low z medium z high z 6 8 Consumption c(a, z) 8 7 6 ( c) Consumption, with Entrepreneurship low z medium z high z 6 8 Figure : Saving and Consumption Policy Functions References Achdou, Yves, Jean-Michel Lasry, Pierre-Louis Lions, and Benjamin Moll.. Wealth Distribution and the Business Cycle: The Rold of Private Firms. Princeton University Working Papers. Buera, Francisco J., and Yongseok Shin.. Financial Frictions and the Persistence of History: A Quantitative Exploration. Journal of Political Economy, Forthcoming.

.6 ( a) with Entrepreneurship.. Density... 6 7 8 Figure : Wealth Distribution Cagetti, Marco, and Mariacristina De Nardi. 6. Entrepreneurship, Frictions, and Wealth. Journal of Political Economy, (): 8 87.