Research Update: Race and Male Joblessness in Milwaukee: 2008

Similar documents
Vibrancy and Property Performance of Major U.S. Employment Centers. Appendix A

Kathryn Robinson. Grades 3-5. From the Just Turn & Share Centers Series VOLUME 12

The Elusive Connection between Density and Transit Use

ASSESSING ACCURACY: HOTEL HORIZONS FORECASTS

2/25/2019. Taking the northern and southern hemispheres together, on average the world s population lives 24 degrees from the equator.

1. Evaluation of maximum daily temperature

Scaling in Biology. How do properties of living systems change as their size is varied?

Trends in Metropolitan Network Circuity

Chapter 4: Displaying and Summarizing Quantitative Data

North American Geography. Lesson 5: Barnstorm Like a Tennis Player!

Lab Activity: Weather Variables

NAWIC. National Association of Women in Construction. Membership Report. August 2009

HI SUMMER WORK

During the latter half of the twentieth. Modest Progress:

Lesson 1 - Pre-Visit Safe at Home: Location, Place, and Baseball

Solving Quadratic Equations by Graphing 6.1. ft /sec. The height of the arrow h(t) in terms

Hotel Industry Overview. UPDATE: Trends and outlook for Northern California. Vail R. Brown

MEASURING RACIAL RESIDENTIAL SEGREGATION

Demographic Change Near Rail Stations

Using the ACS to track the economic performance of U.S. inner cities

Heat and Health: Reducing the Impact of the Leading Weather-Related Killer

Authors: Antonella Zanobetti and Joel Schwartz

The Spatial Structure of Cities in the United States

FIRM FRAGMENTATION AND URBAN PATTERNS 1. INTRODUCTION

Measures of Urban Patterns in Large Urban Areas in the U.S.,

Climate Uncovered: Media Fail to Connect Hurricane Florence to Climate Change

Online Robustness Appendix to Endogenous Gentrification and Housing Price Dynamics

Income Change in Milwaukee s Inner City, A UWM Center for Economic Development Research Update

Land-Use Controls, Natural Restrictions, and Urban Residential Land Prices

34 ab ArchitectureBoston

COMMUTING ANALYSIS IN A SMALL METROPOLITAN AREA: BOWLING GREEN KENTUCKY

Accessibility and Transit Performance

Tracking and Explaining Neighborhood Socio- Economic Change in U.S. Metropolitan Areas between 1990 and 2010

SHSU ECONOMICS WORKING PAPER

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION SERIES

Inter and Intra Buffer Variability: A Case Study Using Scale

Access Across America: Transit 2017

C) Discuss two factors that are contributing to the rapid geographical shifts in urbanization on a global scale.

Urban Revival in America

JUPITER MILLER BUSINESS CENTER 746,400 SF FOR LEASE

Can Public Transport Infrastructure Relieve Spatial Mismatch?

American Tour: Climate Objective To introduce contour maps as data displays.

A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R 2nd Edition. Brian S. Everitt and Torsten Hothorn

This work is distributed as a Discussion Paper by the STANFORD INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH. SIEPR Discussion Paper No.

Compact city policies: a comparative assessment

Understanding the Impact of Weather for POI Recommendations

Get involved in the City Nature Challenge 2018!

Access Across America: Transit 2016

The Americas Political Map Ng Country Region Maps

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN BOOKSTACKS

Do Regions Matter for the Behavior of City Relative Prices in the U. S.?

Viewpoint Integra Realty Resources Real Estate Value Trends

Lecture: Sampling and Standard Error LECTURE 8 1

Multi-Dimensional Geometric Complexity in Urban Transportation Systems

RNR 516A. Computer Cartography. Spring GIS Portfolio

Exercises 36 CHAPTER 2/ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF DATA

Do the Causes of Poverty Vary by Neighborhood Type?

22 cities with at least 10 million people See map for cities with red dots

Density and Walkable Communities

Employment Decentralization and Commuting in U.S. Metropolitan Areas. Symposium on the Work of Leon Moses

Ch. 13: Urban Patterns

CURRICULUM VITAE Lingqian Hu Updated on January 1, 2018

Public Library Use and Economic Hard Times: Analysis of Recent Data

CEP Discussion Paper No 778 February 2007 Decomposing the Growth in Residential Land in the United States Henry G. Overman, Diego Puga and Matthew A.

Spatial approach to analyzing dynamics of racial diversity in large U.S. cities:

CHAPTER 6: AIR MASSES & WEATHER PATTERNS

Investigation 11.3 Weather Maps

SOUTH COAST COASTAL RECREATION METHODS

A Convenient Transit of Mercury: November 8-9, 2006

CRP 608 Winter 10 Class presentation February 04, Senior Research Associate Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity

Effects of Urban Rail Transit Expansions: Evidence from Sixteen Cities,

Human Geography. Urban Development. Urban Development. Urban Development. Unit 8: Urban Development. I. Why are Settlements Established?

Missed Opportunity: Transit and Jobs in Metropolitan America

Non-Parametric Two-Sample Analysis: The Mann-Whitney U Test

ECONOMIES Recent explanations of international export performance have been developed and outlined in New Trade Theory (NTI). In essence, NTT asserts

Missed Opportunity: Transit and Jobs in Metropolitan America

arxiv: v1 [q-bio.pe] 19 Dec 2012

Equity, Accessibility and Transit Use in large American cities

TESTING PROTOCAL. Via & US Mail. April 30, 2010

Chapter 5 Integer Programming

Explaining Racial/Ethnic Gaps In Spatial Mismatch: The Primacy of Racial Segregation

Explaining Racial/Ethnic Gaps in Spatial Mismatch: The Primacy of Racial Segregation

A Note on Commutes and the Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis

Summary of Terminal Master s Degree Programs in Philosophy

John D. Landis a a Department of City and Regional Planning, University of. Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA Published online: 18 May 2015.

Mahesh Somashekhar Curriculum Vitae

Finite mathematics & Applied calculus

Using Census Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMAs) as Primary Sampling Units in Area Probability Household Surveys

Keywords: Program Evaluation; Methodology; Economic Redevelopment; Employment; Firm Location

Rank University AMJ AMR ASQ JAP OBHDP OS PPSYCH SMJ SUM 1 University of Pennsylvania (T) Michigan State University

A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R 3rd Edition. Torsten Hothorn and Brian S. Everitt

Short-Term Job Growth Impacts of Hurricane Harvey on the Gulf Coast and Texas

A Shift to the Sunbelt

+ Statistical Methods in

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Shock Wave Petunia. P. x hybrida Seed Count (Pelleted): 33,000 S./oz. (1,200 S./g)

Powder River Basin Coal Update

Transferability of Household Travel Data Across Geographic Areas Using NHTS 2001

Invoice Information. Remittance Account Number: Invoice Number: Invoice Date: Due Date: Total Amount Due: PLEASE SEND PAYMENT TO:

List of Supplemental Figures

Transcription:

Research Update: Race and Male Joblessness in Milwaukee: 2008 by: Marc V. Levine University of Wisconsin Milwaukee Center for Economic Development Briefing Paper September 2009

Overview Over the past decade, the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee Center for Economic Development has documented the alarming extent to which joblessness among working age African American males has grown in Milwaukee since the 1970s. 1 Once one of the nation s most opportunity filled urban labor markets for black males, by 2000 Milwaukee registered among the highest rates of black male joblessness and largest racial disparities in jobless rates among U.S. cities and metropolitan areas. In our in depth study, The Crisis of Black Male Joblessness in Milwaukee, we analyzed the reasons for the sharp racial disparities in the Milwaukee labor market, examined the shortcomings of existing policies, and recommended a sweeping set of new strategies to meet the challenge nothing short of a Milwaukee Marshall Plan to attack the city s job crisis. 2 The tables and chart in this update provide the most recent measures on race and male joblessness, drawn from the just released 2008 data of the U.S. Bureau of the Census American Community Survey (ACS). Although the rate of black male joblessness in metropolitan Milwaukee remains unconscionably high, as it does across the country, the percentage of black working age males not employed (for whatever reason) in Milwaukee fell from 51.1 percent to 47.1 percent between 2007 and 2008 (see Table 1). Although any decline in the black male joblessness rate is welcome, three caveats are in order. First, even though the rate declined between 2007 2008, at 47.1 percent it remains unacceptably high. Milwaukee registered the fifth highest rate of black male joblessness among 35 of the largest metro areas in the U.S. (see 1 See Marc V. Levine, Stealth Depression: Joblessness in the City of Milwaukee Since 1990 (UWM Center for Economic Development, August 2003); Marc V. Levine, After the Boom: Joblessness in Milwaukee Since 2000 (UWM Center for Economic Development, 2004); Marc V. Levine, The Crisis of Black Male Joblessness in Milwaukee: Trends, Explanations, and Policy Options (UWM Center for Economic Development, March 2007); Marc V. Levine, The Crisis of Black Male Joblessness in Milwaukee: 2006 (UWM Center for Economic Development, October 2007); and Marc V. Levine, The Crisis Continues: The Crisis of Black Male Joblessness in Milwaukee: 2007 (UWM Center for Economic Development, October 2008). 2 See Levine, The Crisis of Black Male Joblessness in Milwaukee: Trends, Explanations, and Policy Options, pp. 56-63. 2

chart below) in 2008, and posted the largest racial disparity in jobless rates of any metropolitan area in the country (see Table 4). The jobless rate for prime working age (25 54) black males living in the city of Milwaukee in 20008 was over 4 times the rate for prime working age white males living in the region s suburbs (see Table 3). Second, at least some of the decline between 2007 2008 may simply reflect the margin of error in ACS tabulations. There is around a 4% error margin in the reported results for Milwaukee ACS sample for working age black males (ages 16 64) and black male employment, so at the outer edge of the margin it is possible, though not likely, that the jobless rate was unchanged between 2007 and 2008. And third, even though some improvement in the joblessness picture may have occurred in 2008, the lag in the data means that these figures do not reflect the serious deterioration in the Milwaukee labor market that has occurred since the Great Recession took full hold in the city in late 2008 and through 2009. Since August 2008, employment in the city of Milwaukee has declined by over 18,000 (6.9 percent). 3 If even a small fraction of those job losses were incurred by African American males, as seems highly plausible, then the black male jobless rate will have climbed well north of 50 percent by the time the 2009 data are available next year, perhaps as high as 55 57%, if the black male share of the 2008 09 employment losses was commensurate with the proportion of black males in the Milwaukee labor force. In short, there is little reason to celebrate the marginal improvements revealed in the 2008 ACS data. The crisis of black male joblessness in Milwaukee continues, the current mix of policies and strategies remains ineffective, and the need for dramatic new directions in policy remains undeniable. 3 Marc V. Levine, Monthly Employment Watch: Milwaukee and the Nation s Largest Cities (UWM Center for Economic Development, 2009). 3

Tables and Charts Black Male Joblessness In Selected U.S. Metropolitan Areas: 2008 Buffalo San Diego Detroit Pittsbugh Milwaukee San Francisco Chicago Philadelphia Memphis Cleveland St. Louis Columbus Cincinnati Hartford Los Angeles Richmond Las Vegas Birmingham Seattle Minneapolis Jacksonville New York Miami Kansas City Baltimore Indianapolis Dallas Phoenix Nashville Houston Boston Atlanta Denver Charlotte Washington D.C. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 % jobless 4

Table 1: Male Joblessness in Metropolitan Milwaukee, 2000 2008 (percentage of working age* males unemployed or not in the labor force) YEAR BLACK WHITE HISPANIC 2000 47.6% 16.0% 34.1% 2006 46.8% 17.9% 22.7% 2007 51.1% 18.6% 22.9% 2008 47.1% 18.1% 22.1% Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population, 2000; American Community Survey, 2006, 2007, 2008 *Working age = between ages of 16 64 Table 2: Metropolitan Milwaukee Male Jobless Rates: 2007 2008 By Race, Ethnicity, and Age AGE CATEGORY BLACK WHITE HISPANIC 2007 2008 2007 2008 2007 2008 16 24 64.5% 69.6% 37.8% 35.6% 44.4% 43.2% 25 54 43.2% 36.2% 10.4% 10.9% 15.7% 13.8% 55 64 61.8% 53.2% 28.4% 27.2% 25.6% 33.7% Source: American Community Survey, 2007, 2008. 5

Table 3: City Suburban Disparities in Male Joblessness in Metropolitan Milwaukee: 2008 Jobless Rates (%), by Race, Ethnicity, Age, and Place of Residence AGE BLACK BLACK WHITE WHITE HISPANIC HISPANIC CITY SUBURBS CITY SUBURBS CITY SUBURBS All Working Age 47.4% 44.7% 23.1% 16.4% 24.2% 17.0% Young Adults 70.1% 64.0% 36.8% 35.2% 53.0% 23.8% Prime Working Age 36.2% 36.2% 16.0% 8.2% 14.6% 11.5% All working age= 16 64; Young adults = 16 24; Prime working age = 25 54 6

Table 4: Male Jobless Rates in Selected Metropolitan Areas, By Race: 2008 Percentage of working age (16 64) males either unemployed or out of the labor force METRO AREA BLACK JOBLESS % WHITE JOBLESS % BLACK/ WHITE RATIO PCT. GAP IN BLACK/ WHITE RATES Milwaukee 47.1 17.8 2.60 29.3 Buffalo 52.0 23.8 2.18 28.2 Pittsburgh 47.6 22.8 2.09 24.8 Detroit 49.9 25.5 1.96 24.4 Chicago 43.5 19.2 2.27 24.3 Memphis 41.4 18.1 2.33 23.3 San Diego 50.6 28.2 1.79 22.4 San Francisco 44.1 21.9 2.01 22.2 Philadelphia 43.2 21.3 2.02 21.9 Minneapolis 37.0 16.5 2.24 20.5 St. Louis 40.5 20.8 1.95 19.7 Hartford 39.4 19.8 1.99 19.6 Cleveland 41.2 21.7 1.90 19.5 Richmond 38.8 19.7 1.97 19.1 Columbus 40.1 21.4 1.87 18.7 Kansas City 36.2 18.1 2.00 18.1 Cincinnati 39.7 22.4 1.77 17.3 Dallas 34.7 17.7 1.96 17.0 Baltimore 36.1 19.4 1.86 16.7 Los Angeles 38.9 22.7 1.71 16.2 Seattle 37.3 21.4 1.74 15.9 Birmingham 37.9 22.6 1.68 15.3 Denver 31.6 16.4 1.93 15.2 Houston 33.6 18.5 1.82 15.1 Indianapolis 35.5 20.6 1.72 14.9 New York 36.6 22.0 1.66 14.6 Las Vegas 37.9 23.5 1.61 14.4 Nashville 34.1 19.7 1.73 14.4 Jacksonville 36.6 23.5 1.56 13.1 Charlotte 31.1 18.4 1.69 12.7 Phoenix 34.4 21.9 1.57 12.5 Atlanta 32.3 20.0 1.62 12.3 Boston 32.5 20.6 1.58 11.9 Miami 36.2 24.4 1.48 11.8 Washington, D.C. 27.7 19.2 1.44 8.5 7

8