H IGHWAY 3 WILDLIFE MORTALITY

Similar documents
Spatio-temporal Patterns of Wildlife Distribution and Movement in Canmore s Benchlands Corridor.

Lesson Nine Population Problems. Key question How does growth of Florida s human population affect bear populations?

GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

Safety effects of lower speed limits during winter months

Putative Canada Lynx (Lynx canadensis) Movements across I-70 in Colorado

The Climate of Payne County

The Climate of Grady County

Mountain View Community Shuttle Monthly Operations Report

The Climate of Haskell County

ENGINE SERIAL NUMBERS

Science Standard 1: Students analyze monthly precipitation and temperature records, displayed in bar charts, collected in metric units (mm).

The Climate of Murray County

Calculations Equation of Time. EQUATION OF TIME = apparent solar time - mean solar time

Life Cycle of Convective Systems over Western Colombia

The Climate of Kiowa County

Tornado Hazard Risk Analysis: A Report for Rutherford County Emergency Management Agency

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

The Climate of Marshall County

The Climate of Texas County

Relationship between weather factors and survival of mule deer fawns in the Peace Region of British Columbia

P7.7 A CLIMATOLOGICAL STUDY OF CLOUD TO GROUND LIGHTNING STRIKES IN THE VICINITY OF KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLORIDA

The Climate of Pontotoc County

Monthly Magnetic Bulletin

The Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 4 Northern Cascades

8.5. Modelling Data with Sinusoidal Functions. INVESTIGATE the Math

The Climate of Seminole County

Drought Characterization. Examination of Extreme Precipitation Events

The Climate of Bryan County

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 347 moose

Analysing The Temporal Pattern Of Crime Hotspots In South Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Technical note on seasonal adjustment for M0

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES

REDWOOD VALLEY SUBAREA

Drought in Southeast Colorado

Climatography of the United States No

8 VISIBILITY. 8.1 Setting. 8.2 Assessment Focus. Table 8-1: Key Issue for Visibility

Practice Test Chapter 8 Sinusoidal Functions

Climatography of the United States No

2019 Settlement Calendar for ASX Cash Market Products. ASX Settlement

Monitoring on Subsidence Claims. John Parvin Subsidence Claims Manager

Climatography of the United States No

Monthly Magnetic Bulletin

Statistical Models for Rainfall with Applications to Index Insura

ZUMWALT WEATHER AND CLIMATE ANNUAL REPORT ( )

Monthly Magnetic Bulletin

Computing & Telecommunications Services Monthly Report January CaTS Help Desk. Wright State University (937)

LAB 3: THE SUN AND CLIMATE NAME: LAB PARTNER(S):

Computing & Telecommunications Services

Responsive Traffic Management Through Short-Term Weather and Collision Prediction

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY MILITARY SURFACE DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION COMMAND (SDDC) 1 SOLDIER WAY SCOTT AFB, IL 62225

A Report on a Statistical Model to Forecast Seasonal Inflows to Cowichan Lake

Grant Opportunity Monitoring Bi-State Sage-grouse Populations in Nevada

Montana Drought & Climate

Monthly Magnetic Bulletin

MiSP Astronomy - Seasons Worksheet #1 L2

The Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 5 High Plateau

Published by ASX Settlement Pty Limited A.B.N Settlement Calendar for ASX Cash Market Products

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 358 moose

Champaign-Urbana 1998 Annual Weather Summary

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

KING EDWARD POINT OBSERVATORY MAGNETIC DATA

Outage Coordination and Business Practices

P7: Limiting Factors in Ecosystems

DAILY QUESTIONS 28 TH JUNE 18 REASONING - CALENDAR

Climatography of the United States No

Creating a Pavement Management System Using GIS

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Corn Basis Information By Tennessee Crop Reporting District

Dates and Prices ICAEW - Manchester In Centre Programme Prices

Climatography of the United States No

Project Appraisal Guidelines

GTR # VLTs GTR/VLT/Day %Δ:

Annual Average NYMEX Strip Comparison 7/03/2017

Climate also has a large influence on how local ecosystems have evolved and how we interact with them.

Champaign-Urbana 2000 Annual Weather Summary

Appendix BAL Baltimore, Maryland 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Suppression of colonies of Reticulitermes spp. using the Sentricon termite colony elimination system: : A case study in Chatsworth, CA

WIND DATA REPORT. Vinalhaven

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

TMC Monthly Operational Summary

Jayalath Ekanayake Jonas Tappolet Harald Gall Abraham Bernstein. Time variance and defect prediction in software projects: additional figures

Determine the trend for time series data

A SUMMARY OF RAINFALL AT THE CARNARVON EXPERIMENT STATION,

Monthly Magnetic Bulletin

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

The 2017 Statistical Model for U.S. Annual Lightning Fatalities

Transcription:

Miistakis Institute for the Rockies H IGHWAY 3 WILDLIFE MORTALITY CONTENTS Introduction 1 Methods 2 Data Limitations 3 Results 3 Discussion 8 Special points of interest: The analysis includes mortality data from 1997-24 from the Alberta/ British Columbia border to Lundbreck. INTRODUCTION The Municipality of Crowsnest Pass is situated in a rare east-west corridor bisecting the Canadian Rocky Mountains in SW Alberta. Highway 3, which runs the length of the Pass, is a major transportation route supporting over 6 vehicles per day. Wildlife mortality, due to collisions with vehicles, has been identified as a major human safety and wildlife conservation issue on this 44 km stretch of highway with approximately 19 large mammal deaths each year. It is important that decision makers acquire information on where wildlife are most likely to cross the road to ensure effective mitigation measures are implemented. This report highlights the results of an analysis of eight years of wildlife mortality data Bighorn Sheep Grazing close to the Highway (M. Quinn) (1997-24) collected by Volker Stevins from the Alberta/ British Columbia border extending east to Lundbreck, Alberta. Deer account for 88% of the mortality records. An average of 19 large mammals are killed each year. Ten high collision zones were identified in the study area. M ETHODS Mortality data are collected daily along Highway 3 by Volker Stevins, a contractor hired by Alberta Transportation to maintain Highway 3. Volker Stevin s staff drive the road in the morning and evening to remove wildlife killed on the highway. Information is recorded on the type of species, date (d/m/y), time (AM or PM), sex and location (distance from local landmarks) on hard copy forms. The majority of records are for ungulates. Alberta Fish and Wildlife are contacted when a carnivore is killed and information on the event is entered into the ENFOR database at the Fish and Wildlife office. ENFOR data were not included in this analysis. Volkers Stevins mortality data was obtained from Alberta Fish and Wildlife Blairmore office. The mortality data was entered into a GIS database. Location information was entered as a distance in meters east or west from specified local landmarks. Local landmarks were given a spatial location by driving highway 3 and using a global positioning system (GPS) to mark their location. A route processing wizard in ArcGIS was used to accurately place each morality point the appropriate distance from the specified landmark. The resulting database was used to create graphs highlighting the total mortality per year, type of species and seasonal variations in mortality. The spatial data were used to determine high mortality zones along Highway 3.

Page 2 D ATA LIMITATIONS There are a number of data limitations that should be considered when evaluating the results of this analysis. The true accuracy of each morality point is unknown. The data collected by Volker Stevins is described in meters from a local landmark. As with any study that relies on human estimates of distance, we are not sure of the accuracy level. Other studies have documented mortality points within 25 m segments or 1/1 of a mile. In our spatial analysis we also used 25 m segments to represent high collision areas. Other data limitations include missing data for the months of April and July 21 and December and February 22. These data are missing from the analysis and represent an inconsistency and limitation of the database. R ESULTS Mortality (Number of Animals) 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Mortality per Year (1997-24) 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 Year M O R T A L I T Y P E R Y E A R The mortality data indicate that over the eight year period (1997-24) an average of 19 animals were killed per year. This is likely an underestimate because the calculation does not include animals (mainly carnivores) that are collected by Alberta Fish and Wildlife, animals that are picked up by people for various purposes or injured animals that may wander off into the bush to die. Additionally, there are data missing for 21 and 22, resulting in a lower overall average per year. A VERAGE MORTALITY PER MONTH Mortality varies seasonally in the region. The mortality data indicates that months of higher collisions include February to April and October to November. Mortality (average number per month) 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Average Mortality per Month (1997-24) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month

Highway 3 Wildlife Mortality Page 3 M ORTALITY PER SPECIES There was a total of 877 mortality occurrences recorded along Highway 3 from 1997 to 24. Deer account for 88% of the total mortality records. 56% of the collisions involved mule deer and 32 % involved white tailed deer. Elk accounted for just under 5% of the total mortality records. Although carnivores appear infrequently, this data analysis did not include data from the Alberta Fish and Wildlife database in which most carnivore data is stored. Mortality (Number of Animals) 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Fox Black Bear Coyote Moose Deer Bighorn Sheep Elk White Tailed Deer Mule Deer Mortality per Species (1997-24) Lynx Cougar Badger S PECIES MORTALITY PER MONTH Mortality (Number of Animals) 75 7 65 6 55 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Species Mortality per Month (1997-24) Mule Deer White Tailed Deer Elk Bighorn Sheep Jan Feb Mar April May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month Alberta Transportation has proposed the expansion and realignment of Highway 3. The expansion has many implications for wildlife, specifically in relation to direct mortality and human safety. Information such as that included in this report is pertinent to decision makers as they address human safety and wildlife movement in the future. This graph represents species mortality per month over the eight year period (1997-24). Of interest here is the pattern between mule deer and white tailed deer. Mule deer account for the highest mortality numbers between Jan-Jun and Sep-Dec (represented by the blue line). White tailed deer however account for the highest mortality numbers from Jul-Aug (represented by the green line).

Page 4 H IGH COLLISION ZONES ALONG HIGHWAY3 To assess high collision zones along Highway 3 the highway was divided into 187, 25 m segments. The total number of mortality records occurring in each segment was summed. The mean number of mortality records per segment was 8.57, with a standard deviation of 7.5. The data ranged from to 37 total mortalities per segment. To determine high collision zones, we compared the spatial pattern exhibited by the mortality data with that expected from a random distribution based on a Poisson distribution. Assuming a Poisson distribution and a significance level of.5, each segment is expected to have -14 mortality records. This means that there is a 95% chance of a segment having between and 14 mortality records assuming a Poisson distribution. High collision zones were defined as a minimum of 2 adjacent segments with 15 or greater mortality records. This analysis includes total morality (all species). Based on these criteria there are 1 high collision zones in the study area from the Alberta/British Columbia border to Lundbreck, based on the mortality data from 1997-24. The graph below depicts the segments along the y-axis and the number of wildlife mortality records on the x- axis. The green line represents the cut off for expected results assuming a Poisson distribution. High Collision Zones on Highway 3 4 35 Number of Animals per segment 3 25 2 15 1 5 1 9 17 25 33 41 49 57 65 73 81 89 97 15 113 121 129 137 145 153 161 169 177 185 Segment Number (25 m)

Highway 3 Wildlife Mortality Page 5 H IGH COLLISION ZONES ALONG HIGHWAY 3 A new project, Road Watch in the Pass provides the community with an opportunity to report their wildlife observations along Highway 3 using an on-line tool. This project will provide another valuable information source on wildlife movement and crossing locations. The website is www. rockies.ca/roadwatch. F OCUS AREA OF HIGH COLLISION ZONE 3 The map above depicts all high collision zones along Highway 3. High collision zones are defined as 2 or more adjacent segments with 15 or greater mortality records. The zones are labeled from 1 through 1. Zones 1-6 occur within the Municipality of Crowsnest Pass. The map to the right focuses on high collision zone 3 near the West Coleman assess. This type of information is useful when considering human safety issues in the Pass, because it reflects where collisions have been most prominent in the last eight years.

Page 6 M ORTALITY OCCURENCES ALONG HIGHWAY 3 The map to the left depicts total mortality per 25m segment. The red bars illustrate proportional mortality, visually highlighting the high collision zones. E LK HIGH COLLISION ZONES The graph and maps represented on the previous page depict total mortality (88% deer). Species can be assessed separately to depict species-specific high collision zones. Elk account for 5% of the mortality records and are a species of management interest. The graph below depicts high collision zones for elk 5 based on the same methodology used for the 4 total mortality high collision 3 zones. The mean mortality per 25m segment 2 was.223 with a standard deviation of.717. 1 Mortality records per segment ranged from -4. Therefore any Mortality (Number of Elk) segment with 1 or greater mortality records occurring in 2 or more adjacent segments is considered a high collision zone. Based on these assumptions there are five high collision zones for elk. High Collision Zones for Elk along Highway 3 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 5 57 64 71 78 85 92 99 16 113 12 127 134 141 148 155 162 169 176 183 Segment Number

H i g h wa y 3 W i ld li fe M or t a li t y Page 7 ELK HIGH COLLISION ZONES ALONG HIGHWAY ELK FOCUS AREA OF COLLISION ZONES The map at the top of the page depicts spatially the high collision zones along Highway 3 for elk. All the five zones occur within the Municipality of Crowsnest Pass. The map to the right focuses in on high collision zones 3 and 4. 3 AND 3 4

D ISCUSSION Atlas Sawmill in the Crowsnest Pass (M. Quinn) Miistakis Institute for the Rockies, C/o EVDS, University of Calgary 25 University Drive NW Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4 T: 43-22-8968 E: institute@rockies.ca It is important that decision makers and the community of the Crowsnest Pass have access to information regarding the location of collision zones along Highway 3. This information is important when addressing human safety through the development of mitigation measures to reduce vehicle and wildlife collisions. The collision zones along Highway 3 identified by the mortality data are based on 877 mortality records from 1997-24. Eighty-eight percent of the records are comprised of deer. Zones of high collision may be linked to habitat variables or road characteristics, such as curvature and line of sight. Characteristics associated with these zones were not assessed in this report. The information presented in this report is ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS important for decision makers to identify both general and species-specific movement areas. As an example, we highlighted high collision zones for elk. There were 42 mortality records for elk over the eight year period. There were not enough mortality records for Bighorn sheep to run a similar analysis. The mortality data presented in this report represents one information source of information that focuses on wildlife and Highway 3. However, it does not contain sufficient information for carnivores. Other data sets that provide insight on crossing locations in this region will greatly enhance the knowledge base needed by decision makers. The information in this unsolicited report was prepared for the community of the Crowsnest Pass. Miistakis would like to acknowledge the assistance of Jim Clark, from the Alberta Fish and Wildlife Blairmore office, Chester Markowski, from Volker Stevins Contracting Ltd. and Janet Quinn from Road Watch in the Pass in providing Miistakis with the mortality data.