CMB Anisotropy. Ned Wright, UCLA

Similar documents
What s New in Cosmology. Edward L. (Ned) Wright UCLA 10 November 2006

Galaxies 626. Lecture 3: From the CMBR to the first star

Cosmic Microwave Background Introduction

The cosmic background radiation II: The WMAP results. Alexander Schmah

Taking the Measure of the Universe. Gary Hinshaw University of British Columbia TRIUMF Saturday Series 24 November 2012

Really, really, what universe do we live in?

Cosmology with CMB: the perturbed universe

Introduction. How did the universe evolve to what it is today?

A5682: Introduction to Cosmology Course Notes. 11. CMB Anisotropy

Cosmology. Jörn Wilms Department of Physics University of Warwick.

Physical Cosmology 6/6/2016

n=0 l (cos θ) (3) C l a lm 2 (4)

MODERN COSMOLOGY LECTURE FYTN08

CMB studies with Planck

CMB Anisotropies Episode II :

CMB Anisotropies: The Acoustic Peaks. Boom98 CBI Maxima-1 DASI. l (multipole) Astro 280, Spring 2002 Wayne Hu

Concordance Cosmology and Particle Physics. Richard Easther (Yale University)

A5682: Introduction to Cosmology Course Notes. 11. CMB Anisotropy

Structure in the CMB

Thermal History of the Universe and the Cosmic Microwave Background. II. Structures in the Microwave Background

Brief Introduction to Cosmology

Correlations between the Cosmic Microwave Background and Infrared Galaxies

El Universo en Expansion. Juan García-Bellido Inst. Física Teórica UAM Benasque, 12 Julio 2004

Announcements. Homework. Set 8now open. due late at night Friday, Dec 10 (3AM Saturday Nov. 11) Set 7 answers on course web site.

Lecture 03. The Cosmic Microwave Background

V. The Thermal Beginning of the Universe

Cosmology II: The thermal history of the Universe

Power spectrum exercise

AST5220 lecture 2 An introduction to the CMB power spectrum. Hans Kristian Eriksen

Physics 661. Particle Physics Phenomenology. October 2, Physics 661, lecture 2

Galaxy A has a redshift of 0.3. Galaxy B has a redshift of 0.6. From this information and the existence of the Hubble Law you can conclude that

Cosmic Microwave Background. References: COBE web site WMAP web site Web sites of Wayne Hu, Max Tegmark, Martin White, Ned Wright and Yuki Takahashi

Ringing in the New Cosmology

The Big Bang. Olber s Paradox. Hubble s Law. Why is the night sky dark? The Universe is expanding and We cannot see an infinite Universe

Modern Cosmology April 4, Lecture 3 1

20 Lecture 20: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation continued

Astronomy 182: Origin and Evolution of the Universe

Analyzing the CMB Brightness Fluctuations. Position of first peak measures curvature universe is flat

Dark Universe II. The shape of the Universe. The fate of the Universe. Old view: Density of the Universe determines its destiny

Lecture 09. The Cosmic Microwave Background. Part II Features of the Angular Power Spectrum

Observational evidence for Dark energy

The cosmic microwave background radiation

AST5220 lecture 2 An introduction to the CMB power spectrum. Hans Kristian Eriksen

The Growth of Structure Read [CO 30.2] The Simplest Picture of Galaxy Formation and Why It Fails (chapter title from Longair, Galaxy Formation )

MIT Exploring Black Holes

Galaxy Formation Seminar 2: Cosmological Structure Formation as Initial Conditions for Galaxy Formation. Prof. Eric Gawiser

Dark Universe II. Prof. Lynn Cominsky Dept. of Physics and Astronomy Sonoma State University

Structures in the early Universe. Particle Astrophysics chapter 8 Lecture 4

Modern Cosmology / Scott Dodelson Contents

CMB anisotropy & Large Scale Structure : Dark energy perspective

Astr 102: Introduction to Astronomy. Lecture 16: Cosmic Microwave Background and other evidence for the Big Bang

Understanding the Properties of Dark Energy in the Universe p.1/37

The Search for the Complete History of the Cosmos. Neil Turok

Chapter 22 Lecture. The Cosmic Perspective. Seventh Edition. The Birth of the Universe Pearson Education, Inc.

CMB Anisotropies and Fundamental Physics. Lecture II. Alessandro Melchiorri University of Rome «La Sapienza»

COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND ANISOTROPIES

Physics 218: Waves and Thermodynamics Fall 2003, James P. Sethna Homework 11, due Monday Nov. 24 Latest revision: November 16, 2003, 9:56

Weighing the universe : baryons, dark matter, and dark energy

Cosmology. An Analogy 11/28/2010. Cosmology Study of the origin, evolution and future of the Universe

What is the evidence that Big Bang really occurred

Polarization from Rayleigh scattering

Lecture 37 Cosmology [not on exam] January 16b, 2014

The Millennium Simulation: cosmic evolution in a supercomputer. Simon White Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics

Dark Energy in Light of the CMB. (or why H 0 is the Dark Energy) Wayne Hu. February 2006, NRAO, VA

Cosmic Microwave Background John Carlstrom

Astronomy 422. Lecture 20: Cosmic Microwave Background

What can we Learn from the Cosmic Microwave Background

Astronomy 162, Week 10 Cosmology Patrick S. Osmer Spring, 2006

Chapter 17 Cosmology

INFLATIONARY COSMOLOGY. and the ACCELERATING UNIVERSE. Alan Guth, MIT

BAO AS COSMOLOGICAL PROBE- I

Astr 2320 Thurs. May 7, 2015 Today s Topics Chapter 24: New Cosmology Problems with the Standard Model Cosmic Nucleosynthesis Particle Physics Cosmic

Weighing the dark side of the universe

The Contents of the Universe (or/ what do we mean by dark matter and dark energy?)

Cosmology: The History of the Universe

WMAP 9-Year Results and Cosmological Implications: The Final Results

Structures in the early Universe. Particle Astrophysics chapter 8 Lecture 4

Cosmology. Thornton and Rex, Ch. 16

Chapter 23 Lecture. The Cosmic Perspective Seventh Edition. Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and the Fate of the Universe Pearson Education, Inc.

BASICS OF COSMOLOGY Astro 2299

Today. life the university & everything. Reminders: Review Wed & Fri Eyes to the web Final Exam Tues May 3 Check in on accomodations

Ta-Pei Cheng PCNY 9/16/2011

Cosmology: Building the Universe.

Cosmic Microwave Background. Eiichiro Komatsu Guest Lecture, University of Copenhagen, May 19, 2010

An Acoustic Primer. Wayne Hu Astro 448. l (multipole) BOOMERanG MAXIMA Previous COBE. W. Hu Dec. 2000

The CMB since WMAP

The State of the Universe [2010] There is only data and the interpretation of data (green text = assumptions)

Chapter 21 Evidence of the Big Bang. Expansion of the Universe. Big Bang Theory. Age of the Universe. Hubble s Law. Hubble s Law

Physics 463, Spring 07. Formation and Evolution of Structure: Growth of Inhomogenieties & the Linear Power Spectrum

WMAP Cold Spot Extragalactic Radio Sources and

FURTHER COSMOLOGY Book page T H E M A K E U P O F T H E U N I V E R S E

Present limits to cosmic bubbles from the COBE-DMR three point correlation function.

CMB Polarization Experiments: Status and Prospects. Kuo Assistant Professor of Physics Stanford University, SLAC

Observational Cosmology

Licia Verde. Introduction to cosmology. Lecture 4. Inflation

Lecture 32: Astronomy 101

baryons+dm radiation+neutrinos vacuum curvature

Introduction to Cosmology

The Early Universe John Peacock ESA Cosmic Vision Paris, Sept 2004

1920s 1990s (from Friedmann to Freedman)

Transcription:

CMB Anisotropy Ned Wright, UCLA

True Contrast CMB Sky 33, 41 & 94 GHz as RGB, 0-4 K scale

Enhanced Contrast: Conklin 1969-2σ Henry 1971-3σ Corey & Wilkinson 1976-4σ Smoot et al. 1977-6σ

Personal History: Anisotropy

A Big Media Splash in 1992: 25 April 1992 Prof. Stephen Hawking of Cambridge University, not usually noted for overstatement, said: It is the discovery of the century, if not of all time.

Inflation: Repulsion exponential growth

Solving Horizon & Flatness-Oldness A small patch grows to be bigger than the observable Universe. T=const is explained. Whatever the curvature of the patch may be, it will look flat. Density=critical is explained.

Animated View of Inflation Quantum fluctuations occur uniformly throughout spacetime Future light cones have radii of (c/h)[exp(hδt)-1] As small circles become large, new small circles are formed. Equal Power on All Scale - EPAS

COBE DMR vs EPAS Chi-by-eye suggests that the Equal Power on All Scales prediction of inflation is correct.

Sachs-Wolfe Effect

Measured Δφ Leads to Structure

Prediction of Doppler Peaks: From Bond & Efstathiou, 1987, MNRAS, 226, 655-687

Two Fluids in the Early Universe Most of the mass is dark matter 80-90% of the density Zero pressure Sound speed is zero The baryon-photon fluid baryons are protons & neutrons = all ordinary matter energy density of the photons is bigger than c 2 times the density of baryons Pressure of photons = u/3 = (1/3)ρ c 2 Sound speed is about c/ 3 = 170,000 km/sec

Traveling Sound Wave: c s = c/ 3

Stay at home Dark Matter

Interference at last scattering For the wavelength illustrated [1/2 period between the Big Bang and recombination], the denser = hotter effect and potential well = cooler effect have gotten in phase. For larger wavelengths they are out of phase at recombination:

Density contrast vs a(t)

Contrast at last scattering vs κ

Potential survival vs κ See Seljak, astro-ph/9406050, Two-fluid approximation

Spherical Harmonic Decomposition

Conversion from k to l Mean l is (π/4)kr LS for density effects, and (3π/16)kR LS for velocity effects Velocity effects give a broad spectrum in l and contribute little to the peaks in the angular power spectrum.

Many parameters to measure Careful measurements of the power at various angular scales can determine the Hubble constant, the matter density, the baryon density, and the vacuum density.

COBE View was Blurry

Observations pour in after COBE By 1994 Scott & White give > 95% confidence that the Doppler peaks are present: 9407073

Observations since 1994 More Saskatoon QDMAP Saskatoon on a balloon TOCO Saskatoon on a truck (Mobile Anisotropy Telescope) in Chile + D band (150 GHz channel) BOOMERanG MAXIMA DASI ARCHEOPS CBI

Smaller Scale Experiments

BOOMERanG First acoustic peak was well established and position known before BOOMERanG: l pk = 210±15 (L. Page, 2 Jan 2000) The Italian-American BOOMERanG balloonborne experiment announced the flat Universe in April 2000: l pk = 197±6 BOOMERanG was a big improvement in sky coverage and sensitivity, and thus reduced the first peak position uncertainty to about 3% (unfortunately 4σ off the true l pk = 220)

DASI:Degree Angular Scale Interferometer

At the South Pole where it s very cold & dry 26-36 GHz

2000 Power Spectrum

2001 Power Spectrum

The Very Small Array 14 antennae 4.5 o or 2 o FOV 0.5 o or 0.2 o res 26-36 GHz 1.5 GHz bandwidth Teide on Tenerife

VSA Sky Map

Cosmic Background Imager Chile @ 5.08 km 13 antennae 26-36 GHz 10 GHz band 0.75 o FOV 0.075 o res Mosaic many FOV s together

CBI Map

Pre-MAP Power Spectrum Flat, n=1; ω b = 0.021, ω c = 0.196, H o = 47; ω b = 0.022, ω c = 0.132, H o = 68, Λ = 2/3

Some definitions T(l,b) = T o + ΔT d cos θ + Σ a lm Y lm (l,b) C l = < a lm 2 > Baryon density ω b = Ω b h 2 or the density relative to the critical density for H o = 100 which is 18.8 10-30 grams/cm 3 or 18.8 yoctograms per cubic meter in SI. Cold Dark Matter density ω c = Ω c h 2 Vacuum energy density Λ = Ω Λ or energy density = 10.5 Ω Λ h 2 kev/cm 3

Calibration Uncertainties Each experiment (except for COBE and later WMAP) has amplitude uncertainty of several percent that is correlated across all the data from that experiment. I have done fits and plots that solve separately for calibration adjustment nuisance parameters which are included in the χ 2 but not in the errorbars. Combining data from many experiments gives a flexible observed spectrum due to these calibration errors.

WMAP Science Working Group

The MAP RF plumbing is very complex with 10 horns per side, 20 DA s, 40 amplifier chains.

Seeing WMAP at L2 You need a pretty big telescope. These pictures were taken on 16 Nov 2001 with the KPNO 4m by Ian Dell Antonio The 3 stars are mag 15.2, 15.4 & 17.3 FOV is 115 wide.

Seeing WMAP at L2 You need a pretty big telescope. These pictures were taken on 16 Nov 2001 with the KPNO 4m by Ian Dell Antonio The 3 stars are mag 15.2, 15.4 & 17.3 FOV is 115 wide.

First map from WMAP, day 01186

Combination to remove foreground

Foreground vs CMB Power

Nobs for K, Q & W

Remove v SS, 2000x contrast

Remove Galaxy, 19000x Contrast

QVW as RGB

No Galaxy on same scale

Effects on Peak Position: l pk + Open or vacuum dominated Universes give larger distance to last scattering surface + High matter density gives smaller wavelength

What We Have Learned: pre-wmap

With WMAP replacing COBE

Info from peak & trough heights Overall Amplitude of the perturbations Agrees with large scale structure if sum of neutrino masses is < 0.7 ev Primordial power spectrum power law spectral index: n = 0.99 ± 0.04 without running index. Agrees with inflationary prediction Baryon/photon and DM/baryon density ratios ρ b = 0.42 yoctograms/m 3 = 0.42 10-30 gm/cc ρ cdm = 2.1 yg/m 3 [ω Ωh 2 = ρ/{18.8 yg/m 3 }]

Pre-WMAP densities

With WMAP replacing COBE Note the new BBNS value from astro-ph/0302006

Key to Models

ΛCDM is a Good Fit H o = 71, Ω Λ = 0.73, Ω b h 2 = 0.0224, Ω m h 2 = 0.135, Ω tot = 1

Super-Sandage is Closed H o = 32, Ω Λ = 0, Ω b h 2 = 0.0232, Ω m h 2 = 0.139, Ω tot = 1.3

Best Fit: Two Many Tooth Fairies H o = 50, Ω Λ = 0.51, Ω b h 2 = 0.0233, Ω m h 2 = 0.141, Ω tot = 1.08

Einstein de Sitter Model Fails H o = 50, Ω Λ = 0, Ω b h 2 = 0.0236, Ω m h 2 = 0.25, Ω tot = 1

Can this model be saved? Einstein de Sitter fails because it is off the degeneracy line. To get the peak positions right the densities have to be pushed out of the sweet spot. As a result the amplitude, especially at low l, is wrong. An 8σ discrepancy on C l Blanchard et al. astro-ph/0304237 fix this with a broken power law primordial P(k). They use a mixed dark matter approach to get the Large Scale Structure right. Their EdS model is still 3σ off on H o and 10σ off on the accelerating Universe data from supernovae.

Is the Universe Really Flat? CMB data alone give some limits but adding H o and SNe priors gives much better limits. Replacing COBE by WMAP does not dramatically change the limits on Ω tot. CMB only CMB+SNe CMB+H o All Pre-WMAP 1.18(11) 1.04(4) 1.02(3) 1.02(2) With WMAP 1.16(9) 1.04(3) 1.03(3) 1.02(2)

More Restrictions on Models Quintessence is restricted: w = P/ρc 2-0.78 in the dark energy Neutrino masses add up to less than 0.7 ev ΔP(k)/P = -8 Ω ν /Ω m (Hu et al. astro-ph/9712057) So this limit, about 7% of the CDM density, gives a 50% reduction in small-scale power

Going Flat Out with LSS & Lyα Assuming a flat, Ω tot = 1, Universe gives: H o = 71 ± 3.5 km/s/mpc t o = 13.7 ± 0.2 Gyr Ω Λ = 0.73 ± 0.04 Ω b h 2 = 0.0224 ± 0.001 or 0.25 baryons/m 3 Ω m h 2 = 0.135 ± 0.009 or 2.54 yoctograms/m 3 σ 8 = 0.84 ± 0.04

Late ISW Effect Potential only changes if Ω m 1 (or in non-linear collapse, but that s another story [Rees-Sciama effect]).

Potential decays at z 0.6

Correlated with Observed LSS This late ISW effect occurs on our past light cone so the ΔT we see is due to structures we also see. Search for correlation between LSS at z=0.6 and the CMB anisotropy: see Boughn & Crittenden, astroph/0111281 Expected 0.035 cross-correlation between NVSS sources and COBE DMR observed -0.003 ± 0.025

Correlation is seen with WMAP Correlation between WMAP and LSS seen by: Boughn & Crittenden (astro-ph/0305001) at 2.75σ with hard Xray background and 2.25σ with NVSS Nolta et al. (astro-ph/0305097) at 2σ with NVSS

ΛCDM is OK, sscdm fails at 3σ

Possible Improvements? Less noisy and higher resolution CMB data. Use a better tracer of LSS. IR surveys trace old stars and thus are close to a mass survey.

2MASS Galaxies at z 0.15 Milky Way stars To get a deeper sample, use:

WISE WISE will provide an all-sky survey from 3 to 23 µm with three orders of magnitude better sensitivity than IRAS. The survey will help search for the origins of planets, stars, and galaxies and will be a valuable precursor for JWST. WISE will Find the most luminous galaxies in the Universe. Find the closest stars to the sun. Detect most main belt asteroids larger then 3km. Mission Overview Circular 500-km Sun-synchronous orbit. 7-month mission including a 1-month checkout. Four 1024 2 focal plane arrays. 40-cm telescope cooled by a two-stage solidhydrogen cryostat. Scan mirror to stabilize the line-of-sight while the spacecraft scans the sky.

Nothing really funny Where the hell does it all come from? And where does the vacuum energy come from? Why 3.9 kev/cc?

We (and all of chemistry) are a small minority in the Universe.

CONCLUSION The basic ΛCDM model for the Big Bang with inflation is confirmed: The baryon density is measured to an accuracy of 4% from the CMB and agrees with the value from BBNS (9% accuracy) to within 5%. Flat model fit only to CMB data matches the Hubble constant, supernova and large scale structure data. Age of the Universe in a flat ΛCDM model is 13.7 ± 0.2 Gyr Get more information at http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov

WMAP Status At L2, having completed of 4 th full year of observations. Approved for an extended mission of 8 years total at L2 if the spacecraft and instrument continue to work and we ever get the polarization data out. WMAP has already greatly exceeded the minimum space mission goal discussed at Snowmass in 1994 of measuring the anisotropy to the cosmic variance limit for all scales larger than a degree. More integration will greatly improve the SNR on polarization and l s up to 1000.