A Note on V. I. Arnold s Chord Conjecture. Casim Abbas. 1 Introduction

Similar documents
An integral lift of contact homology

THE EXISTENCE PROBLEM

Embedded contact homology and its applications

A SHORT GALLERY OF CHARACTERISTIC FOLIATIONS

Stein fillings of contact 3-manifolds obtained as Legendrian sur

1 Contact structures and Reeb vector fields

NON-ISOTOPIC LEGENDRIAN SUBMANIFOLDS IN R 2n+1

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 20 Dec 2017

LECTURE 5: SOME BASIC CONSTRUCTIONS IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

A 21st Century Geometry: Contact Geometry

A Crash Course of Floer Homology for Lagrangian Intersections

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gt] 14 Dec 2004

(Non-)Existence of periodic orbits in dynamical systems

LECTURE 5: COMPLEX AND KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

Existence of Engel structures

Symplectic folding and non-isotopic polydisks

The Arnold Chord Conjecture. Heather Macbeth

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 12 Aug 2016

The topology of symplectic four-manifolds

Hofer s Proof of the Weinstein Conjecture for Overtwisted Contact Structures Julian Chaidez

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

Diffraction by Edges. András Vasy (with Richard Melrose and Jared Wunsch)

Reeb dynamics in dimension 3

ONATHEOREMOFCHEKANOV [39]

Symplectic topology and algebraic geometry II: Lagrangian submanifolds

ON THE FOLIATION OF SPACE-TIME BY CONSTANT MEAN CURVATURE HYPERSURFACES

Applications of embedded contact homology

The Strominger Yau Zaslow conjecture

Corrigendum to: Geometric Composition in Quilted Floer Theory

We thank F. Laudenbach for pointing out a mistake in Lemma 9.29, and C. Wendl for detecting a large number errors throughout the book.

arxiv:math/ v3 [math.sg] 20 Sep 2004

LECTURES ON THE TOPOLOGY OF SYMPLECTIC FILLINGS OF CONTACT 3-MANIFOLDS

RELATIVE ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF PSEUDOHOLOMORPHIC HALF-CYLINDERS

KODAIRA DIMENSION OF LEFSCHETZ FIBRATIONS OVER TORI

Contact Geometry of the Visual Cortex

Transversality. Abhishek Khetan. December 13, Basics 1. 2 The Transversality Theorem 1. 3 Transversality and Homotopy 2

Math 868 Final Exam. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each). Y (φ t ) Y lim

Manifolds and tangent bundles. Vector fields and flows. 1 Differential manifolds, smooth maps, submanifolds

arxiv: v1 [math.sg] 27 Nov 2017

Foliations of Three Dimensional Manifolds

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gt] 26 Sep 2005

Differential Geometry qualifying exam 562 January 2019 Show all your work for full credit

Lecture VI: Projective varieties

Lecture Fish 3. Joel W. Fish. July 4, 2015

THE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF MANIFOLDS OF POSITIVE ISOTROPIC CURVATURE AND SURFACE GROUPS

Introduction to Floer Homology and its relation with TQFT

Basic Objects and Important Questions

Lectures on the topology of symplectic fillings of contact 3-manifolds

Contact Geometry and 3-manifolds

TAUBES S PROOF OF THE WEINSTEIN CONJECTURE IN DIMENSION THREE

Algebraic Topology European Mathematical Society Zürich 2008 Tammo tom Dieck Georg-August-Universität

Knot Contact Homology, Chern-Simons Theory, and Topological Strings

PLANAR OPEN BOOK DECOMPOSITIONS OF 3-MANIFOLDS

ON KNOTS IN OVERTWISTED CONTACT STRUCTURES

Legendrian graphs generated by tangential families

Closed characteristics on non-compact mechanical contact manifolds 1

Nodal symplectic spheres in CP 2 with positive self intersection

Solutions to the Hamilton-Jacobi equation as Lagrangian submanifolds

Lagrangian Intersection Floer Homology (sketch) Chris Gerig

Holomorphic line bundles

Existence of Engel structures. Thomas Vogel

Lecture I: Overview and motivation

Transversal torus knots

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f))

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 23 Dec 2001

Multiplicity of singularities is not a bi-lipschitz invariant

Stable tangential families and singularities of their envelopes

A Quantitative Look at Lagrangian Cobordisms

ON r-neighbourly SUBMANIFOLDS IN R N. Victor A. Vassiliev. 1. Introduction. Let M be a k-dimensional manifold, and r a natural number.

THE JORDAN-BROUWER SEPARATION THEOREM

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.ag] 18 Oct 2003

Floer homology and Gromov-Witten invariant over integer of general symplectic manifolds - summary -

Qualifying Exams I, Jan where µ is the Lebesgue measure on [0,1]. In this problems, all functions are assumed to be in L 1 [0,1].

PERIODIC ORBITS FOR HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS

arxiv: v4 [math.sg] 28 Feb 2016

On a relation between the self-linking number and the braid index of closed braids in open books

arxiv: v4 [math.gt] 14 Oct 2013

On the homotopy invariance of string topology

arxiv: v1 [math.sg] 6 Nov 2015

Morse-Bott Homology. Augustin Banyaga. David Hurtubise

DISTINGUISHING EMBEDDED CURVES IN RATIONAL COMPLEX SURFACES

Kähler manifolds and variations of Hodge structures

APPROXIMATE YANG MILLS HIGGS METRICS ON FLAT HIGGS BUNDLES OVER AN AFFINE MANIFOLD. 1. Introduction

An invariant of Legendrian and transverse links from open book decompositions of contact 3-manifolds

Geometry of generating function and Lagrangian spectral invariants

On growth rate and contact homology

ERRATA FOR INTRODUCTION TO SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

CONORMAL BUNDLES, CONTACT HOMOLOGY, AND KNOT INVARIANTS

Vector fields in the presence of a contact structure

Minimal Log Discrepancy of Isolated Singularities and Reeb Orbits

Lagrangian and Legendrian Singularities

On the topology of fillings of contact manifolds and applications

GLOBAL PROPERTIES OF TIGHT REEB FLOWS WITH APPLICATIONS TO FINSLER GEODESIC FLOWS ON S 2

Math 752 Week s 1 1

A FRANKS LEMMA FOR CONVEX PLANAR BILLIARDS

MONODROMY OF COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS AND SURFACE POTENTIALS

Qualifying Exams I, 2014 Spring

Contact Structures and Classifications of Legendrian and Transverse Knots

1.2. Examples of symplectic manifolds 1. (R 2n, ω 0 = n

Area preserving isotopies of self transverse immersions of S 1 in R 2

Transcription:

IMRN International Mathematics Research Notices 1999, No. 4 A Note on V. I. Arnold s Chord Conjecture Casim Abbas 1 Introduction This paper makes a contribution to a conjecture of V. I. Arnold in contact geometry, which he stated in his 1986 paper [4]. A [4] on a closed, oriented three manifold M is a 1-form τ so that τ dτ is a volume form. There is a distinguished vectorfield X τ, called the Reeb vectorfield of τ, which is defined by i Xτ dτ 0 and i Xτ τ 1. The standard example on S 3 is the following: Consider the 1-form λ on R 4 defined by λ = 1 2 (x 1dy 1 y 1 dx 1 + x 2 dy 2 y 2 dx 2 ). This induces a contact form on the unit three sphere S 3. Observe that all the orbits of the Reeb vectorfield are periodic; they are the fibres of the Hopf fibration. Note that the dynamics of the Reeb vectorfield changes drastically in general if we replace λ by the contact form fλ where f is a nowhere vanishing function on S 3 (see the example in [3]; see also [1], [2]). A Legendrian knot in a contact manifold (M, τ) is a knot which is everywhere tangent to ker τ. Then V. I. Arnold stated the following conjecture. Conjecture ([4]). Let λ be the above contact form on the three sphere. If f: S 3 (0, ) is a smooth function and L is a Legendrian knot in S 3, then there is a characteristic chord for (fλ, L), i.e., a trajectory x of the Reeb vectorfield and some number T 0 so that x(0) L and x(t) L. There is almost nothing known about this problem. V. I. Arnold only mentioned the case where f 1: Projecting the Legendrian knot onto S 2 using the Hopf fibration, we observe that the area enclosed by this curve is a multiple of 4π. Hence, it must have Received 1 July 1998. Revision received 20 October 1998. Communicated by Helmut Hofer.

218 Casim Abbas a self-intersection, which in turn shows that an orbit of the Reeb vectorfield intersects the Legendrian knot at two different times. Definition 1.1. A three-dimensional submanifold of R 4 is called a strictly convex hypersurface in R 4 if it is closed and if it bounds a compact, strictly convex set containing the origin. We provide an existence proof for characteristic chords in the case where the contact manifold is a strictly convex hypersurface S R 4 with contact form λ S, and where we confine ourselves to special Legendrian knots: We only consider Legendrian knots which are not linked with a certain periodic orbit of the Reeb vectorfield. Our result is based on the following crucial theorem by H. Hofer, K. Wysocki, and E. Zehnder [10], [8]. Theorem 1.2. Let S be a strictly convex hypersurface in R 4 and let J be a complex structure on the symplectic vectorbundle ker λ S compatible with dλ; i.e.,dλ (Id J) should be a bundle metric on ker λ (such J always exist; see [3]). Then there exist: an unknotted periodic orbit P 0 of the Reeb vectorfield X λ with self-linking number 1 and generalized Conley-Zehnder index 3 (binding orbit); and a diffeomorphism Φ: S 1 C S\P 0 with the following properties. For every τ S 1, the map u τ := Φ(τ,.) is an embedding and has the following properties: u τ (C) is transversal to X λ. u τ (Re 2πit ) P 0 (T 0 t)asr + with convergence in C, where T 0 is the minimal period of P 0. The maps u τ satisfy the following partial differential equation: π λ s u τ + J(u τ )π λ t u τ = 0, where π λ : TS ker λ is the projection along χ λ, d(u τλ i) = 0. dλ uτ (C) is nondegenerate and C u τ dλ = T 0 (0, ). Each u τ (C) gives rise to a global surface of section; i.e. the closure of u τ (C) is an embedded disk D τ with D τ = P 0, and for each point p S\P 0, there are real numbers t (p) < 0 and t + (p) > 0 so that ϕ t (p)(p), ϕ t + (p)(p) D τ = u τ (C), where ϕ denotes the flow of X λ.

A Note on V. I. Arnold s Chord Conjecture 219 H. Hofer, K. Wysocki, and E. Zehnder have actually shown that any periodic orbit P 0 of X λ, which is unknotted with self-linking number 1 and generalized Conley-Zehnder index 3, is a binding orbit as described in Theorem 1.2 (see Theorem 1.6 in [9] and Section 7 of [10]). Our result is the following theorem. Theorem 1.3. Let S be a strictly convex hypersurface in R 4 equipped with the contact form λ S. Let L S be a Legendrian knot with the following additional property: Assume there is an unknotted periodic orbit P 0 of X λ which has self-linking number 1 and generalized Conley-Zehnder index 3, so that L and P 0 are not linked. Then there exists a characteristic chord for the knot L. We note that such an orbit P 0 always exists in view of Theorem 1.2, so there are many knots L for which the assumptions are satisfied. The obvious drawback is, of course, that the hypothesis is in general difficult to verify. Remark. The assumption of P 0 having generalized Conley-Zehnder index 3 can be dropped since Theorem 1.2 also holds without this assumption (see [7]). In fact, it follows from Theorem 1.2 that there always exist at least two unknotted periodic orbits P 0 and P 1 which have self-linking number 1 and are linked with lk(p 0,P 1 ) = 1. In view of this remark, the following is true. P 0 P 1 Theorem 1.4. Let S be a strictly convex hypersurface in R 4 equipped with the contact form λ S. Let L S be a Legendrian knot with the following additional property: Assume there is an unknotted periodic orbit P 0 of X λ which has self-linking number 1, so that L and P 0 are not linked. Then there exists a characteristic chord for the knot L. The relation between Theorem 1.3 and V. I. Arnold s conjecture is the following: The projection along the rays issuing from the origin in R 4 defines a diffeomorphism φ: S 3 S by z h(z)z with a suitable smooth function h: S 3 (0, ). Then φ λ S = h 2 λ S 3. Hence Theorem 1.3 gives an affirmative answer to V. I. Arnold s conjecture if we restrict the class of admissible Legendrian knots and the class of contact forms fλ.

220 Casim Abbas 2 Proof of Theorem 1.3 We assume, of course, that P 0 L = since we are done otherwise. Let us choose τ 0 S 1 so that our given knot L and u τ0 (C) intersect transversally. We define the map Ψ: Z = D R S\P 0, (x, y, z) ϕ z (u 0 (x, y)), where ϕ denotes the flow of X λ,dis the open unit disk in R 2, and u 0 = Φ(τ 0,φ(.)) with φ being the diffeomorphism φ: D C,re iϕ (1 r 2 ) 1 re iϕ. Then L and Σ := u 0 (D) intersect transversally. Denote by T ± : Σ R ± the positive (resp., negative) return time; i.e., T + (p) (resp., T (p) ) is the smallest positive (resp., largest negative) time t where we have ϕ t (p) Σ. Let us denote by P Σ : Σ Σ the Poincaré map; i.e.,p Σ (p) = ϕ T + (p)(p). The inverse P 1 Σ is given by p ϕ T (p)(p). We observe that inf T ± (p) > 0 (1) p Σ and that the derivative of Ψ is an isomorphism at every point (x, y, z) Z. Assume now Ψ(x, y, z) = Ψ(x,y.z ) for some points (x, y, z), (x,y,z ) Z. Then ϕ z z (u 0 (x, y)) = u 0 (x,y ) and there is some k Z so that and u 0 (x,y ) = P k Σ (u 0(x, y)) k 1 z = z (T ± P ±l Σ l=0 u 0)(x, y), where ±=sign k and PΣ 0 := Id Σ. Using this and (1), we see that Ψ: Z S\P 0 is the universal cover of S\P 0. A straightforward calculation shows that the 1-form ν = Ψ λ on Z is given by ν = dz + u 0 λ.

A Note on V. I. Arnold s Chord Conjecture 221 Moreover, it is a contact form with Reeb vectorfield X ν (x, y, z) = = (0, 0, 1). z Let γ: [0, 1] S\P 0 be a parametrization of our Legendrian knot L; i.e., γ(0) = γ(1), γ([0, 1]) = L, and γ is an embedding. Take any lift γ: [0, 1] Z of γ. Note that γ is a smoothly embedded curve since Ψ is a local diffeomorphism. Moreover, γ is Legendrian with respect to the contact structure ker ν on Z. The homology groups H 1 (L, Z) and H 1 (S\P 0, Z) are isomorphic to Z; denote generators by [L] and [S\P 0 ]. Then the inclusion L S\P 0 induces a homomorphism i : H 1 (L, Z) H 1 (S\P 0, Z), so there exists k Z so that i [L] = k [S\P 0 ]. Then lk(l,s\p 0 ) = k is the linking number of L and P 0 in S. By our assumption that L and P 0 are not linked, we have k = 0. If {L} is a generator of π 1 (L) Z, and if i # : π 1 (L) π 1 (S\P 0 ) is the homomorphism induced by the inclusion i, then the following hold. L and P 0 are not linked if and only if i # {L} π 1 (S\P 0 ) is the trivial class. A lift γ: [0, 1] Z of γ is a closed curve if and only if L and P 0 are not linked. Hence, any lift γ: [0, 1] Z = D R of γ is a closed curve. Writing γ(t) = (ζ(t),z(t)) D R, we obtain 0 = γ ν = ζ (u S 1 S 1 0 λ). We use the following lemma (Proposition 5.4. of [10]). Lemma 2.1. Consider on D the 2-form f(x, y)dx dy with f>0and integrable on D. Then there exists a diffeomorphism τ: D D satisfying τ (fdx dy) = cdx dy for a suitable constant c>0. Applying this to our situation, we get τ d(u 0λ) = cdx dy. If ζ: D D is any smooth extension of ζ: S 1 D, and if we write ξ := τ 1 ζ, ξ := τ 1 ζ, then 0 = ζ (u S 1 0 λ) = ζ d(u 0 λ) D = c ξ (dx dy) D = c ξ (xdy ydx). 2 S 1

222 Casim Abbas This means that the area of the set enclosed by the curve ξ equals zero, so ξ must have a self-intersection. This implies that ζ must also have a self-intersection; hence there is a characteristic chord for the Legendrian knot γ. Because γ was a lift of the curve γ with respect to Ψ and because Ψ maps orbits of X ν to orbits of X λ, we also have obtained a characteristic chord for the knot L. References [1] C. Abbas, Asymptotic behaviour of pseudoholomorphic half-planes in symplectisations, PhD thesis, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, Zürich, 1997. [2], Finite energy surfaces and the chord problem, Duke Math. J. 96 (1999), 241-316. [3] C. Abbas and H. Hofer, Holomorphic curves and global questions in contact geometry, to appear in Birkhäuser. [4] V. I. Arnold, First steps in symplectic topology, Russ. Math. Surv. 41 (1986), 1 21. [5] Y. Eliashberg, to appear in IAS/Park City Math. Ser. [6] Y. Eliashberg and H. Hofer, Contact homology, in preparation. [7] H. Hofer, private communication. [8] H. Hofer, K. Wysocki, and E. Zehnder, A characterization of the tight three sphere, Duke Math. J. 81 (1995), 159 226. [9], A characterization of the tight three sphere, II, to appear in Comm. Pure Appl. Math. [10], The dynamics on a strictly convex energy surface in R 4, to appear in Ann. of Math., 1998. Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, 251 Mercer Street, New York, New York 10012, USA