Interest Rate Models:

Similar documents
Strong uniqueness for stochastic evolution equations with possibly unbounded measurable drift term

PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS

Brownian Motion. 1 Definition Brownian Motion Wiener measure... 3

PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS

State Space Representation of Gaussian Processes

A Concise Course on Stochastic Partial Differential Equations

The concentration of a drug in blood. Exponential decay. Different realizations. Exponential decay with noise. dc(t) dt.

I forgot to mention last time: in the Ito formula for two standard processes, putting

Finite element approximation of the stochastic heat equation with additive noise

Mathematical Methods for Neurosciences. ENS - Master MVA Paris 6 - Master Maths-Bio ( )

Stochastic contraction BACS Workshop Chamonix, January 14, 2008

Stochastic differential equation models in biology Susanne Ditlevsen

Harnack Inequalities and Applications for Stochastic Equations

{σ x >t}p x. (σ x >t)=e at.

Analysis of SPDEs Arising in Path Sampling Part I: The Gaussian Case

Stochastic Calculus. Kevin Sinclair. August 2, 2016

Fonctions on bounded variations in Hilbert spaces

UNBOUNDED OPERATORS ON HILBERT SPACES. Let X and Y be normed linear spaces, and suppose A : X Y is a linear map.

Bernardo D Auria Stochastic Processes /10. Notes. Abril 13 th, 2010

Gaussian Processes. 1. Basic Notions

Tools of stochastic calculus

Some SDEs with distributional drift Part I : General calculus. Flandoli, Franco; Russo, Francesco; Wolf, Jochen

Modelling energy forward prices Representation of ambit fields

Affine realizations with affine state processes. the HJMM equation

Homogenization with stochastic differential equations

Introduction to Diffusion Processes.

Lecture 4: Introduction to stochastic processes and stochastic calculus

Deterministic. Deterministic data are those can be described by an explicit mathematical relationship

MATH 56A SPRING 2008 STOCHASTIC PROCESSES 197

Linear Filtering of general Gaussian processes

Regularization by noise in infinite dimensions

BV functions in a Gelfand triple and the stochastic reflection problem on a convex set

where r n = dn+1 x(t)

1. Stochastic Processes and filtrations

Potential Theory on Wiener space revisited

Stochastic Gradient Descent in Continuous Time

A Lévy-Fokker-Planck equation: entropies and convergence to equilibrium

Intertwinings for Markov processes

Partial Differential Equations with Applications to Finance Seminar 1: Proving and applying Dynkin s formula

Kolmogorov equations in Hilbert spaces IV

Convoluted Brownian motions: a class of remarkable Gaussian processes

On Stochastic Adaptive Control & its Applications. Bozenna Pasik-Duncan University of Kansas, USA

Functional Limit theorems for the quadratic variation of a continuous time random walk and for certain stochastic integrals

SPDEs, criticality, and renormalisation

Controlled Diffusions and Hamilton-Jacobi Bellman Equations

Continuous Time Approximations to GARCH(1, 1)-Family Models and Their Limiting Properties

Gaussian processes for inference in stochastic differential equations

A Spectral Gap for the Brownian Bridge measure on hyperbolic spaces

Stochastic process for macro

Signal Processing Problems on Function Space: Bayesian Formulation, Stochastic PDEs and Effective MCMC Methods

On a class of stochastic differential equations in a financial network model

The Wiener Itô Chaos Expansion

Karhunen-Loève decomposition of Gaussian measures on Banach spaces

Bernardo D Auria Stochastic Processes /12. Notes. March 29 th, 2012

BOOK REVIEW. Review by Denis Bell. University of North Florida

Brownian Motion and Poisson Process

Modelling Interactions Between Weather and Climate

Moment Properties of Distributions Used in Stochastic Financial Models

In terms of measures: Exercise 1. Existence of a Gaussian process: Theorem 2. Remark 3.

Brownian motion. Samy Tindel. Purdue University. Probability Theory 2 - MA 539

Stochastic Stokes drift of a flexible dumbbell

EXISTENCE OF AFFINE REALIZATIONS FOR STOCHASTIC PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS DRIVEN BY LÉVY PROCESSES

MATH4210 Financial Mathematics ( ) Tutorial 7

Stochastic Volatility and Correction to the Heat Equation

Evaluation of the HJM equation by cubature methods for SPDE

Multi-Factor Lévy Models I: Symmetric alpha-stable (SαS) Lévy Processes

On continuous time contract theory

Ergodicity for Infinite Dimensional Systems

HJB equations. Seminar in Stochastic Modelling in Economics and Finance January 10, 2011

Elliptic Operators with Unbounded Coefficients

Introduction to multiscale modeling and simulation. Explicit methods for ODEs : forward Euler. y n+1 = y n + tf(y n ) dy dt = f(y), y(0) = y 0

Solving Stochastic Partial Differential Equations as Stochastic Differential Equations in Infinite Dimensions - a Review

Existence of Invariant Measures of Stochastic Systems with Delay in the Highest Order Partial Derivatives

Stochastic Partial Differential Equations with Levy Noise

Asymptotic Properties of an Approximate Maximum Likelihood Estimator for Stochastic PDEs

Stochastic Integration and Stochastic Differential Equations: a gentle introduction

Stationary distributions of non Gaussian Ornstein Uhlenbeck processes for beam halos

An Introduction to Stochastic Partial Dierential Equations

Hodge de Rham decomposition for an L 2 space of differfential 2-forms on path spaces

Densities for the Navier Stokes equations with noise

ON THE FRACTIONAL CAUCHY PROBLEM ASSOCIATED WITH A FELLER SEMIGROUP

Lecture 12: Detailed balance and Eigenfunction methods

A Short Introduction to Diffusion Processes and Ito Calculus

Lévy Processes and Infinitely Divisible Measures in the Dual of afebruary Nuclear2017 Space 1 / 32

Introduction to Random Diffusions

1 Brownian Local Time

Northwestern University Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science

2012 NCTS Workshop on Dynamical Systems

Local vs. Nonlocal Diffusions A Tale of Two Laplacians

WHITE NOISE APPROACH TO THE ITÔ FORMULA FOR THE STOCHASTIC HEAT EQUATION

p 1 ( Y p dp) 1/p ( X p dp) 1 1 p

Kolmogorov Equations and Markov Processes

Lecture 1: Pragmatic Introduction to Stochastic Differential Equations

Gaussian Process Approximations of Stochastic Differential Equations

Stochastic Differential Equations

Statistics of Stochastic Processes

Exercises in stochastic analysis

Lecture 12: Detailed balance and Eigenfunction methods

LAN property for sde s with additive fractional noise and continuous time observation

Stochastic (intermittent) Spikes and Strong Noise Limit of SDEs.

Transcription:

1/17 Interest Rate Models: from Parametric Statistics to Infinite Dimensional Stochastic Analysis René Carmona Bendheim Center for Finance ORFE & PACM, Princeton University email: rcarmna@princeton.edu URL: http://www.princeton.edu/ rcarmona/ IPAM / Financial Math January 3-5, 2001

Chapter 6 2/17 Infinite Dimensional Ornstein Uhlenbeck Processes

One Dimensional O-U Processes 3/17

One Dimensional O-U Processes 3/17 Solution of the SDE

One Dimensional O-U Processes 3/17 Solution of the SDE dξ t = aξ t dt + bdw t

One Dimensional O-U Processes 3/17 Solution of the SDE a R or a > 0, b > 0 dξ t = aξ t dt + bdw t

One Dimensional O-U Processes 3/17 Solution of the SDE a R or a > 0, b > 0 dξ t = aξ t dt + bdw t {w t } t 0 one dimensional Wiener process

One Dimensional O-U Processes 3/17 Solution of the SDE a R or a > 0, b > 0 dξ t = aξ t dt + bdw t {w t } t 0 one dimensional Wiener process ξ 0 (implicitly) assumed to be independent of {w t } t 0

One Dimensional O-U Processes 3/17 Solution of the SDE a R or a > 0, b > 0 dξ t = aξ t dt + bdw t {w t } t 0 one dimensional Wiener process ξ 0 (implicitly) assumed to be independent of {w t } t 0 Explicit solution

One Dimensional O-U Processes 3/17 Solution of the SDE a R or a > 0, b > 0 dξ t = aξ t dt + bdw t {w t } t 0 one dimensional Wiener process ξ 0 (implicitly) assumed to be independent of {w t } t 0 Explicit solution ξ t = e ta ξ 0 + b t 0 e (t s)a dw s, 0 t < +

One Dimensional O-U Processes 3/17 Solution of the SDE a R or a > 0, b > 0 dξ t = aξ t dt + bdw t {w t } t 0 one dimensional Wiener process ξ 0 (implicitly) assumed to be independent of {w t } t 0 Explicit solution ξ t = e ta ξ 0 + b t 0 e (t s)a dw s, 0 t < +

Mean value 4/17

Mean value Eξ t = e ta Eξ 0 4/17

Mean value Autocovariance function Eξ t = e ta Eξ 0 4/17

Mean value Autocovariance function Eξ t = e ta Eξ 0 cov{ξ s, ξ t } = [var{ξ 0 } + b 2a (e2(s t)a 1)]e (s+t)a 4/17

Mean value Autocovariance function Eξ t = e ta Eξ 0 cov{ξ s, ξ t } = [var{ξ 0 } + b 2a (e2(s t)a 1)]e (s+t)a {ξ t } is a Gaussian process whenever ξ 0 is Gaussian 4/17

Mean value Autocovariance function Eξ t = e ta Eξ 0 cov{ξ s, ξ t } = [var{ξ 0 } + b 2a (e2(s t)a 1)]e (s+t)a {ξ t } is a Gaussian process whenever ξ 0 is Gaussian {ξ t } is a (strong) Markov process. {ξ t } has a unique invariant measure N(0, b/2a) 4/17

Mean value Autocovariance function Eξ t = e ta Eξ 0 cov{ξ s, ξ t } = [var{ξ 0 } + b 2a (e2(s t)a 1)]e (s+t)a {ξ t } is a Gaussian process whenever ξ 0 is Gaussian {ξ t } is a (strong) Markov process. {ξ t } has a unique invariant measure N(0, b/2a) if ξ 0 N(0, b/2a), {ξ t } is stationary ergodic Markov (mean zero) Gaussian process. Autocovariance function: Eξ s ξ t = b 2a e a t s. 4/17

n-dimensional O-U Processes 5/17

n-dimensional O-U Processes 5/17 a > 0 A n n symmetric positive definite matrix

n-dimensional O-U Processes 5/17 a > 0 A n n symmetric positive definite matrix b > 0 B n n symmetric positive definite matrix

n-dimensional O-U Processes 5/17 a > 0 A n n symmetric positive definite matrix b > 0 B n n symmetric positive definite matrix {w t } t 0 1 dim. Wiener Proc. {W t } t 0 n dim. Wiener Proc.

n-dimensional O-U Processes 5/17 a > 0 A n n symmetric positive definite matrix b > 0 B n n symmetric positive definite matrix {w t } t 0 1 dim. Wiener Proc. {W t } t 0 n dim. Wiener Proc. As before, solution of the SDE

n-dimensional O-U Processes 5/17 a > 0 A n n symmetric positive definite matrix b > 0 B n n symmetric positive definite matrix {w t } t 0 1 dim. Wiener Proc. {W t } t 0 n dim. Wiener Proc. As before, solution of the SDE dx t = AX t dt + BdW t

n-dimensional O-U Processes 5/17 a > 0 A n n symmetric positive definite matrix b > 0 B n n symmetric positive definite matrix {w t } t 0 1 dim. Wiener Proc. {W t } t 0 n dim. Wiener Proc. As before, solution of the SDE dx t = AX t dt + BdW t {W t } t 0 n-dimensional Wiener process

n-dimensional O-U Processes 5/17 a > 0 A n n symmetric positive definite matrix b > 0 B n n symmetric positive definite matrix {w t } t 0 1 dim. Wiener Proc. {W t } t 0 n dim. Wiener Proc. As before, solution of the SDE dx t = AX t dt + BdW t {W t } t 0 n-dimensional Wiener process X 0 (implicitly) assumed to be independent of {W t } t 0

n-dimensional O-U Processes 5/17 a > 0 A n n symmetric positive definite matrix b > 0 B n n symmetric positive definite matrix {w t } t 0 1 dim. Wiener Proc. {W t } t 0 n dim. Wiener Proc. As before, solution of the SDE dx t = AX t dt + BdW t {W t } t 0 n-dimensional Wiener process X 0 (implicitly) assumed to be independent of {W t } t 0 Explicit solution

n-dimensional O-U Processes 5/17 a > 0 A n n symmetric positive definite matrix b > 0 B n n symmetric positive definite matrix {w t } t 0 1 dim. Wiener Proc. {W t } t 0 n dim. Wiener Proc. As before, solution of the SDE dx t = AX t dt + BdW t {W t } t 0 n-dimensional Wiener process X 0 (implicitly) assumed to be independent of {W t } t 0 Explicit solution X t = e ta X 0 + t 0 e (t s)a BdW s, 0 t < +

n-dimensional O-U Processes 5/17 a > 0 A n n symmetric positive definite matrix b > 0 B n n symmetric positive definite matrix {w t } t 0 1 dim. Wiener Proc. {W t } t 0 n dim. Wiener Proc. As before, solution of the SDE dx t = AX t dt + BdW t {W t } t 0 n-dimensional Wiener process X 0 (implicitly) assumed to be independent of {W t } t 0 Explicit solution X t = e ta X 0 + t 0 e (t s)a BdW s, 0 t < +

Mean value 6/17

Mean value EX t = e ta EX 0 6/17

Mean value EX t = e ta EX 0 6/17 Autocovariance function

Mean value EX t = e ta EX 0 6/17 Autocovariance function cov{x s, X t } = e sa var{x 0 }e ta + s t 0 e (s u)a Be (t u)a du

Mean value EX t = e ta EX 0 6/17 Autocovariance function cov{x s, X t } = e sa var{x 0 }e ta + s t 0 e (s u)a Be (t u)a du {X t } is a Gaussian process whenever X 0 is Gaussian

Mean value 6/17 EX t = e ta EX 0 Autocovariance function cov{x s, X t } = e sa var{x 0 }e ta + s t 0 e (s u)a Be (t u)a du {X t } is a Gaussian process whenever X 0 is Gaussian {X t } is a (vector valued) Markov process. Could drive the system with a r-dimensional Wiener process: The n n matrix B replaced by a d r matrix C

Mean value 6/17 EX t = e ta EX 0 Autocovariance function cov{x s, X t } = e sa var{x 0 }e ta + s t 0 e (s u)a Be (t u)a du {X t } is a Gaussian process whenever X 0 is Gaussian {X t } is a (vector valued) Markov process. Could drive the system with a r-dimensional Wiener process: The n n matrix B replaced by a d r matrix C role of B played by C C

Mean value 6/17 EX t = e ta EX 0 Autocovariance function cov{x s, X t } = e sa var{x 0 }e ta + s t 0 e (s u)a Be (t u)a du {X t } is a Gaussian process whenever X 0 is Gaussian {X t } is a (vector valued) Markov process. Could drive the system with a r-dimensional Wiener process: The n n matrix B replaced by a d r matrix C role of B played by C C

{X t } has a unique invariant measure, say µ = N(0, Σ) n- dimensional Gaussian measure µ(dx) = 1 Z(Σ) e <Σ 1 x,x>/2 dx, 7/17 Z(Σ) being a normalizing constant Σ = 0 e sa Be sa ds. Notice that the fact that Σ solves: ΣA + AΣ = B is the crucial property of the matrix Σ

If X 0 µ, {X t } t 0 is stationary mean zero (Markov) Gaussian process with autocovariance tensor: 8/17 Γ(s, t) = E µ {X s X t } = { Σe (t s)a whenever 0 s t e (s t)a Σ whenever 0 t s.

If X 0 µ, {X t } t 0 is stationary mean zero (Markov) Gaussian process with autocovariance tensor: 8/17 Γ(s, t) = E µ {X s X t } = { Σe (t s)a whenever 0 s t e (s t)a Σ whenever 0 t s. Cumbersome formulae when A & B do not commute

If X 0 µ, {X t } t 0 is stationary mean zero (Markov) Gaussian process with autocovariance tensor: 8/17 Γ(s, t) = E µ {X s X t } = { Σe (t s)a whenever 0 s t e (s t)a Σ whenever 0 t s. Cumbersome formulae when A & B do not commute

If A & B do commute 9/17

If A & B do commute Σ = B 0 e 2sA ds = B(2A) 1 9/17

If A & B do commute Σ = B 0 e 2sA ds = B(2A) 1 9/17 If x, y R n we have: < x, Γ(s, t)y >= E µ {< x, X s >< y, X t >} =< Σx, Σe t s A y > with the notation: =< x, e t s A y > Σ <, > D =< D, D >=< D, >

If A & B do commute Σ = B 0 e 2sA ds = B(2A) 1 9/17 If x, y R n we have: < x, Γ(s, t)y >= E µ {< x, X s >< y, X t >} =< Σx, Σe t s A y > with the notation: =< x, e t s A y > Σ <, > D =< D, D >=< D, >

The Markov process {X t } t 0 is symmetric (Fukushima) 10/17

The Markov process {X t } t 0 is symmetric (Fukushima) Generated by the Dirichlet form of the measure µ, i.e. to the quadratic form: Q(f, g) = < f(x), g(x) > B µ Σ (dx) R n defined on the subspace Q of L 2 (R n, µ Σ (dx)) comprising the absolutely continuous functions whose first derivatives (in the sense of distributions) are still in the space L 2 (R n, µ Σ (dx)). 10/17

Infinite Dimensional O-U Processes 11/17

Infinite Dimensional O-U Processes 11/17 Generalizations of the Three Approaches used in the Finite Dimensional Case

Infinite Dimensional O-U Processes 11/17 Generalizations of the Three Approaches used in the Finite Dimensional Case The state space R d of the Wiener noise is replaced by a (possibly infinite dimensional) Hilbert space, say H, or a Banach space E

Infinite Dimensional O-U Processes 11/17 Generalizations of the Three Approaches used in the Finite Dimensional Case The state space R d of the Wiener noise is replaced by a (possibly infinite dimensional) Hilbert space, say H, or a Banach space E are replaced by a Wiener pro- The Wiener noise terms ξ (j) t cess in H or E

Infinite Dimensional O-U Processes 11/17 Generalizations of the Three Approaches used in the Finite Dimensional Case The state space R d of the Wiener noise is replaced by a (possibly infinite dimensional) Hilbert space, say H, or a Banach space E are replaced by a Wiener pro- The Wiener noise terms ξ (j) t cess in H or E The d n dispersion matrix B is replaced by a map σ from H or E into the state space F of f t replacing R n The n n drift coefficient matrix A is replaced by a (possibly unbounded) operator which we will still denote by A

Infinite Dimensional O-U Processes 11/17 Generalizations of the Three Approaches used in the Finite Dimensional Case The state space R d of the Wiener noise is replaced by a (possibly infinite dimensional) Hilbert space, say H, or a Banach space E are replaced by a Wiener pro- The Wiener noise terms ξ (j) t cess in H or E The d n dispersion matrix B is replaced by a map σ from H or E into the state space F of f t replacing R n The n n drift coefficient matrix A is replaced by a (possibly unbounded) operator which we will still denote by A

The role played by BdW t is now played by a H-valued (cylindrical) Wiener process with covariance given by the operator B. The appropriate mathematical object is a linear function, say W B, from the tensor product L 2 ([0, ), dt) ˆ 2 H B into a Gaussian subspace of L 2 (Ω, F, P) where (Ω, F, P) is the complete probability space we work with. If x H B and t 0, then W B (1 [0,t) ( )x) should play the same role as < x, W t > in the finite dimensional case. 12/17

HJM Stochastic PDE 13/17

HJM Stochastic PDE 13/17 For the sake of the present discussion:

HJM Stochastic PDE 13/17 For the sake of the present discussion: Take α t 0

HJM Stochastic PDE 13/17 For the sake of the present discussion: Take α t 0 Choose σ t σ deterministic & independent of t df t dt = Af t + σ dw dt SPDE when A is a partial differential operator

HJM Stochastic PDE 13/17 For the sake of the present discussion: Take α t 0 Choose σ t σ deterministic & independent of t df t dt = Af t + σ dw dt SPDE when A is a partial differential operator Integral form f t = f 0 t 0 Af s ds + σw (t)

Weak Form: for f H < f, f t >=< f, f 0 > t 0 < A f, f s > ds+ < σ f, W (t) > which makes sense when f belongs to the domain D(A ) of the adjoint operator A and the domain D(σ ) of the adjoint operator σ. Very seldom tractable Evolution Form (variation of constant formula): f t = e ta f 0 + t 0 e (t s)s σdw (s) This requires that the exponentials of operators exist, i.e. that A generates a semigroup of operators. 14/17

OU Set Up 15/17

OU Set Up 15/17 X = {X t ; t 0} stochastic process in a Banach/Hilbert space F

OU Set Up 15/17 X = {X t ; t 0} stochastic process in a Banach/Hilbert space F Probability space (Ω, F, P)

OU Set Up 15/17 X = {X t ; t 0} stochastic process in a Banach/Hilbert space F Probability space (Ω, F, P) Filtration (F t ) t 0 (satisfying the usual assumptions)

OU Set Up 15/17 X = {X t ; t 0} stochastic process in a Banach/Hilbert space F Probability space (Ω, F, P) Filtration (F t ) t 0 (satisfying the usual assumptions) Drift operator A, possibly unbounded operator on F. A is the infinitesimal generator of a C 0 -semigroup {e ta ; t 0} of bounded operators on F. The domain of A, D(A) = {f F ; lim t 0 e ta f f t is (generally) is a proper subset of F exists.},

OU Set Up 15/17 X = {X t ; t 0} stochastic process in a Banach/Hilbert space F Probability space (Ω, F, P) Filtration (F t ) t 0 (satisfying the usual assumptions) Drift operator A, possibly unbounded operator on F. A is the infinitesimal generator of a C 0 -semigroup {e ta ; t 0} of bounded operators on F. The domain of A, D(A) = {f F ; lim t 0 e ta f f t is (generally) is a proper subset of F exists.},

Noise W = {W t ; t 0} is a Wiener process in a real separable Banach space E with H W the reproducing kernel Hilbert space associated with the Guassian measure µ (abstract Wiener space) 16/17 E H W H W ( Riesz identification) E

Noise W = {W t ; t 0} is a Wiener process in a real separable Banach space E with H W the reproducing kernel Hilbert space associated with the Guassian measure µ (abstract Wiener space) 16/17 E H W H W ( Riesz identification) E The variance/covariance operator B : E F is a bounded linear operator (thus it has a restriction to H W and this restriction is Hilbert-Schmidt when F is a Hilbert space.) Note one could take B from H W only if we start with a cylindrical Brownian motion. Formally the Ornstein Uhlenbeck process satisfies the stochas-

tic differential equation or in integral form dx t = AX t dt + BdW t 17/17 X t = X 0 + t 0 AX s ds + t 0 BdW s.