Houston Journal of Mathematics. c 1999 University of Houston Volume 25, No. 4, 1999

Similar documents
POSITIVE SOLUTIONS FOR SINGULAR THREE-POINT BOUNDARY-VALUE PROBLEMS

Positive Solutions of Operator Equations on Half-Line

KRASNOSEL SKII TYPE FIXED POINT THEOREM FOR NONLINEAR EXPANSION

Set Integral Equations in Metric Spaces

LYAPUNOV-TYPE INEQUALITIES FOR NONLINEAR SYSTEMS INVOLVING THE (p 1, p 2,..., p n )-LAPLACIAN

Variational Techniques for Sturm-Liouville Eigenvalue Problems

ON A GENERALIZED STURM-LIOUVILLE PROBLEM

A HELLY THEOREM FOR FUNCTIONS WITH VALUES IN METRIC SPACES. 1. Introduction

WHEN IS A FUNCTION NOT FLAT? 1. Introduction. {e 1 0, x = 0. f(x) =

Math 61CM - Solutions to homework 9

REGULARITY OF NONLOCAL MINIMAL CONES IN DIMENSION 2

(4.1) D r v(t) ω(t, v(t))

The final exam will take place on Friday May 11th from 8am 11am in Evans room 60.

Some estimates on the Hermite-Hadamard inequality through quasi-convex functions

Multiple Positive Solutions for the System of Higher Order Two-Point Boundary Value Problems on Time Scales

ODE: Existence and Uniqueness of a Solution

Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. On positive solutions for fourth-order boundary value problem with impulse

ON BERNOULLI BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEM

1.3 The Lemma of DuBois-Reymond

New Expansion and Infinite Series

f(t, ε) = o(g(t, ε)) as ε 0

On the Continuous Dependence of Solutions of Boundary Value Problems for Delay Differential Equations

EXISTENCE OF ENTIRE POSITIVE SOLUTIONS FOR A CLASS OF SEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC SYSTEMS

Three solutions to a p(x)-laplacian problem in weighted-variable-exponent Sobolev space

Calculus of Variations

The Hadamard s inequality for quasi-convex functions via fractional integrals

LYAPUNOV-TYPE INEQUALITIES FOR THIRD-ORDER LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 55 (130) (2005), , Abbotsford. 1. Introduction

Sturm-Liouville Eigenvalue problem: Let p(x) > 0, q(x) 0, r(x) 0 in I = (a, b). Here we assume b > a. Let X C 2 1

arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 28 Jan 2013

INEQUALITIES FOR GENERALIZED WEIGHTED MEAN VALUES OF CONVEX FUNCTION

ON A CONVEXITY PROPERTY. 1. Introduction Most general class of convex functions is defined by the inequality

The Regulated and Riemann Integrals

W. We shall do so one by one, starting with I 1, and we shall do it greedily, trying

Mapping the delta function and other Radon measures

THE EXISTENCE-UNIQUENESS THEOREM FOR FIRST-ORDER DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS.

a n+2 a n+1 M n a 2 a 1. (2)

Integrals along Curves.

Remark on boundary value problems arising in Ginzburg-Landau theory

Lecture 19: Continuous Least Squares Approximation

STURM-LIOUVILLE BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

Bounds for the Riemann Stieltjes integral via s-convex integrand or integrator

21.6 Green Functions for First Order Equations

WENJUN LIU AND QUÔ C ANH NGÔ

Lyapunov-type inequalities for Laplacian systems and applications to boundary value problems

DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS SUPPLEMENT 2007 pp Natalija Sergejeva. Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Parades 1 LV-5400 Daugavpils, Latvia

f(x)dx . Show that there 1, 0 < x 1 does not exist a differentiable function g : [ 1, 1] R such that g (x) = f(x) for all

SOME PROPERTIES OF CHEBYSHEV SYSTEMS

Theoretical foundations of Gaussian quadrature

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 1 Nov 2014

GENERALIZATIONS OF WEIGHTED TRAPEZOIDAL INEQUALITY FOR MONOTONIC MAPPINGS AND ITS APPLICATIONS. (b a)3 [f(a) + f(b)] f x (a,b)

Travelling Profile Solutions For Nonlinear Degenerate Parabolic Equation And Contour Enhancement In Image Processing

Lecture 3. Limits of Functions and Continuity

S. S. Dragomir. 2, we have the inequality. b a

ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF INTERMEDIATE POINTS IN CERTAIN MEAN VALUE THEOREMS. II

Parametrized inequality of Hermite Hadamard type for functions whose third derivative absolute values are quasi convex

MEAN VALUE PROBLEMS OF FLETT TYPE FOR A VOLTERRA OPERATOR

AN INEQUALITY OF OSTROWSKI TYPE AND ITS APPLICATIONS FOR SIMPSON S RULE AND SPECIAL MEANS. I. Fedotov and S. S. Dragomir

Physics 116C Solution of inhomogeneous ordinary differential equations using Green s functions

Convex Sets and Functions

FUNCTIONS OF α-slow INCREASE

UNIQUENESS THEOREMS FOR ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH HÖLDER CONTINUITY

Math 554 Integration

1. On some properties of definite integrals. We prove

Regulated functions and the regulated integral

8 Laplace s Method and Local Limit Theorems

SPACES DOMINATED BY METRIC SUBSETS

4. Calculus of Variations

f (a) + f (b) f (λx + (1 λ)y) max {f (x),f (y)}, x, y [a, b]. (1.1)

The presentation of a new type of quantum calculus

Partial Derivatives. Limits. For a single variable function f (x), the limit lim

g i fφdx dx = x i i=1 is a Hilbert space. We shall, henceforth, abuse notation and write g i f(x) = f

IN GAUSSIAN INTEGERS X 3 + Y 3 = Z 3 HAS ONLY TRIVIAL SOLUTIONS A NEW APPROACH

AMATH 731: Applied Functional Analysis Fall Some basics of integral equations

II. Integration and Cauchy s Theorem

Chapter 28. Fourier Series An Eigenvalue Problem.

MAT612-REAL ANALYSIS RIEMANN STIELTJES INTEGRAL

ON THE C-INTEGRAL BENEDETTO BONGIORNO

Advanced Calculus: MATH 410 Notes on Integrals and Integrability Professor David Levermore 17 October 2004

Phil Wertheimer UMD Math Qualifying Exam Solutions Analysis - January, 2015

SOLUTIONS FOR ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL (1 + µ(f n )) f(x) =. But we don t need the exact bound.) Set

dx dt dy = G(t, x, y), dt where the functions are defined on I Ω, and are locally Lipschitz w.r.t. variable (x, y) Ω.

MA Handout 2: Notation and Background Concepts from Analysis

ON THE OSCILLATION OF FRACTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

Abstract inner product spaces

(2) x't(t) = X> (í)mm0)píj'sgnfoíffyít))], l<i<n, 3 = 1

Research Article Moment Inequalities and Complete Moment Convergence

Appendix to Notes 8 (a)

An optimal 3-point quadrature formula of closed type and error bounds

International Jour. of Diff. Eq. and Appl., 3, N1, (2001),

Note 16. Stokes theorem Differential Geometry, 2005

Math 426: Probability Final Exam Practice

1 The fundamental theorems of calculus.

MORE FUNCTION GRAPHING; OPTIMIZATION. (Last edited October 28, 2013 at 11:09pm.)

Research Article Some Extensions of Banach s Contraction Principle in Complete Cone Metric Spaces

PENALIZED LEAST SQUARES FITTING. Manfred von Golitschek and Larry L. Schumaker

Integral points on the rational curve

Calculus of variations with fractional derivatives and fractional integrals

Research Article On Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions of a Nonlinear Integral Equation

Transcription:

Houston Journl of Mthemtics c 999 University of Houston Volume 5, No. 4, 999 ON THE STRUCTURE OF SOLUTIONS OF CLSS OF BOUNDRY VLUE PROBLEMS XIYU LIU, BOQING YN Communicted by Him Brezis bstrct. Behviour of continu of the solution set of both opertor equtions nd clss of boundry vlue problems re obtined, which prtilly nswers n open problem of mbrosetti [].. Introduction In recent pper [],. mbrosetti, H. Brezis nd C. Cermi studied the combined effects of concve nd convex nonlinerities to elliptic boundry vlue problems of the following type u = λu q + u p, x Ω u >, x Ω (.) u =, x Ω with < q < < p. They proved the existence of two positive solutions to (.) for λ smll by upper nd lower solutions nd vritionl techniques when p is subcriticl. In tht pper, they lso indicted severl interesting open problems. See M [] for exmple. One of those is wht the structure of the solutions is in the one-dimensionl cse. The purpose of the present pper is to study this problem. We will give different pproch nd generl setting of the problem. The min feture is the presence of nonlinerity hving subliner nd superliner behvior. By pplying topologicl methods on cones we will show the existence of brnch C of solutions bifurcting from (, ) tht touches bck {} (P \{}). 99 Mthemtics Subject Clssifiction. 35J65, 34B5, 47H5. Key words nd phrses. continu, boundry vlue problems, cones. This work is supported in prt by NSF(Youth) of Shndong Province nd NNSF of Chin. 757

758 XIYU LIU ND BOQING YN s pplictions, we will discuss in detil clss of boundry vlue problems of ordinry differentil equtions. Some further structure theorems re obtined, nd prtil nswer is given to the question rised in [].. Structure of Solutions of Opertor Equtions This section is devoted to the bstrct setting of the problem. We will discuss the behviour of continu of solutions of equtions with prmeter when both superliner nd subliner effects re present. The min results re Theorem..3. Let E be Bnch spce with cone P, nd I : R + P P be completely continuous opertor, where R + = [, ). Let = {(λ, x) R + P : x = I(λ, x)}. Then clerly is closed nd loclly compct. Write B r = {x P : x < r} for r >. First we list the following conditions for this section. (H) (H) (H3) (H4) x I(,x) x <. I(λ,x) x,λ λ x is rbitrry. (H5) x >, for ny λ >. I(λ,x) x >, uniformly for λ R +. λ + I(λ, x) =, uniformly for x P, ε x ε x,λ + I(λ,x) x >. Lemm.. Suppose tht (H) is stisfied. point of I(, x). Moreover, i(i(, ),, P ) =. where ε (, ) Then x = is the isolted fixed Proof. By condition (H) there exists δ > such tht I(, x) λ x for x < δ, where λ <. Hence I(, ) = nd i(i(, ),, P ) = by [3]. Lemm.. Suppose tht (H) is stisfied. Then for ny λ, λ >, there exists τ > such tht ([λ, λ ] B τ ) [λ, λ ] {}. Proof. Suppose tht there exists sequence λ n [λ, λ ], x n, x n such tht (λ n, x n ). ssume without loss of generlity tht λ n λ [λ, λ ]. Then x n = I(λ n, x n ) in contrdiction with condition (H). Now suppose (H) is stisfied. Then (, ). Recll tht continuum is mximl connected set. Let C be the continuum of contining (, ). Clerly C is closed.

STRUCTURE OF SOLUTIONS OF BOUNDRY VLUE PROBLEMS 759 Lemm.3. Suppose tht (H)(H) re stisfied. Let C + = C \ ((, ) {}). Then C + is connected nd closed. Proof. Let (λ n, x n ) C +, (λ n, x n ) (λ, x). Then (λ, x) C. If λ =, then (λ, x) C +. If λ >, then by Lemm. we know x. Hence (λ, x) C + nd C + is closed. Next if there exist closed nonempty sets S, T such tht C + = S T. Let (, ) S. Then C = ([S ([, ) {})] C + ) T. Clerly T ([, ) {}) =, nd [S ([, ) {})] C + is closed, which implies tht C is not connected. Now we re in position to give the structure of. Theorem.. Suppose tht (H)(H) re stisfied. Then the continuum C of contining (, ) hs the following properties. (i) C contins connected closed subset C + [(, ) (P \{})] ({} P ). (ii) λ = is the bifurction point of I if I(λ, ). (iii) There exists λ > such tht [{λ} (P \{})] C + for λ (, λ ). Proof. Let C + be s in Lemm.3. Then C + is closed nd connected by Lemm.3. Thus the projection of C + onto R + is n intervl, nd we need only to show tht there exists λ > such tht [{λ} (P \{})] C. In fct, if [{λ} (P \{})] C = for ny λ >, then C ((, ) {}) ({} P ). Tke λ > nd let Z = [, λ ] P. Then Z is closed nd convex. By Lemm.,. nd condition (H) there exists τ > such tht [{λ } B τ ] (λ, ), [{} B τ ] (, ), nd I(λ, x) > x for x B τ. Write Q = [, λ ] B τ. Then Q = [, λ ] ( B τ P ) in Z. Let X = Q, then X is compct metric spce. Denote S = C Q, S = Q. Thus S, S re compct disjoint subsets of X, nd no subcontinuum of X cn both meet S nd S. By Lemm. of [4] there exist compct disjoint subsets K, K of X such tht X = K K, S K, S K. Thus K Q =, nd we cn choose n open set U of Q with K U, U K =, U K =, hence U =. By the generl homotopy invrince of fixed point index (see mnn [5]) we hve i(i(λ, ), U(λ), P ) = µ = const, λ [, λ ] where U(λ) = {x : (λ, x) U}. By Lemm. µ = when λ =. Since I(λ, x) > x for x B τ, then by Lemm.3.3 of [3] (pge 9) we hve i(i(λ, ), U(λ ), P ) = i(i(λ, ),, P ) =.

76 XIYU LIU ND BOQING YN Theorem.. Suppose tht (H)(H) re stisfied. Let C, C + be s in Theorem.. Then either (i) C + is unbounded, or (ii) C meets {} (P \{}). Proof. Suppose C + is bounded nd C [{} (P \{})] =. Tke R > such tht C + [, R) B R. Write Q R = [, R] B R, Z = [, R] P, X = ( Q R ) (R, ). Then X is compct in Z, nd Q R = [, R] B R in Z. Let S = (C Q R ) (R, ), S = ( [ Q R ({, R} BR )]) \{(R, ), (, )} which re compct disjoint subsets of X by Lemm.,.. By Lemm. of Rbinowitz [4] we get compct disjoint subsets K, K of X such tht X = K K, S K, S K, nd K QR =, K ({R} BR ) = (R, ), K ({} BR ) = (, ). Tke open set U Q R such tht K U, U K =, U Q R =, U K =, U K =. Hence U =, nd U(R) P = {}. Moreover i(i(λ, ), U(λ), P ) = µ = const, λ [, R]. By Lemm. µ = when λ = since U() = {}, while by Lemm.3.3 of [3]. i(i(r, ), U(R), P ) = i(i(r, ),, P ) = Theorem.3. Suppose tht (H) (H5) re stisfied. Then the continuum C of contining (, ) hs the following properties. (i) C contins connected closed subset C + [(, ) (P \{})] ({} P ). (ii) λ = is the bifurction point of I if I(λ, ). (iii) C + meets {} (P \{}). (iv) There exists λ > such tht x = I(λ, x) hs t lest two nontrivil solutions x λ, x λ for λ (, λ ), nd (λ, x λ ), (λ, x λ ) C+. Proof. Let C + be s in Theorem.. First we will prove tht C + is bounded. In fct, by (H3) there exists R > such tht x R for (λ, x). Let (λ n, x n ), λ n. If there exists ε > with x n > ε, then by (H4) we get contrdiction. On the other hnd if x n, then it will contrdicts (H5). Thus C + is bounded nd ssertion (iii) is true. Next we will show tht if there exists λ >, x P such tht C + ({λ} P ) = {x}, then C + ([, λ] P ) is connected. In fct, if there exist nonempty closed disjoint subsets S, S with C + ([, λ] P ) = S S nd (λ, x) S, then C + = S S3, where S 3 = S (C + [λ, )

STRUCTURE OF SOLUTIONS OF BOUNDRY VLUE PROBLEMS 76 P ). Evidently S 3 nd S re disjoint. This contrdicts with the fct tht C + is connected. Now suppose tht there exist λ n >, λ n such tht the set C + ({λ n } P ) is single-pointed for n >. Let Cn = C + ([, λ n ] P ). Then Cn is connected nd closed. By (iii) there exists x >, (, x ) C +. Let C = n Cn = {z : there exist subsequence n k with z nk Cn k, z nk z}. Hence (, x ) C. By Liu [6] we know tht C is connected nd closed. Moreover C, nd by definition C {} P. Hence x = could not be n isolted fixed point of I(λ, ). 3. utonomous nd Non-utonomous Boundry Vlue Problems In this section, we will use the results obtined in section to study clss of utonomous nd non-utonomous boundry vlue problems of ordinry differentil equtions. First we consider the following non-utonomous problem { (Lx)(t) = f(λ, t, x(t)), t (, ) αx() β p(t)x (t) = γx() + δ p(t)x (3.) (t) = t t where (Lx)(t) = p(t) (p(t)x (t)), p C[, ] C (, ), p(t) > for t (, ), α, β, γ, δ, βγ +αδ +αγ >, nd f C[R + (, ) R +, R + ]. We will ssume p(t) dt < throughout this section. Denote τ (t) = t ρ = βγ + αδ + αγ p(t) dt, nd ρ >. Define p(t) dt, τ (t) = t p(t) dt, u(t) = ρ [δ + γτ (t)], v(t) = ρ [β + ατ (t)], (3.) Then γv + αu ρ. Let E = C[, ] nd { u(t)v(s)p(s), s t k(t, s) = v(t)u(s)p(s), t s (3.3) Then problem (3.) is equivlent to the opertor eqution x = I(λ, x), x P [7], where I(λ, x) = k(t, s)f(λ, s, x(s))ds (3.4) nd P = P (, b) = {x E : min x(t) m(, b) x }, where m(, b) is determined t [,b] by the next lemm, nd, b (, ) be fixed ( = 4, b = 3 4 for exmple). Lemm 3.. The following estimtes hold. min k(t, s) m(, b) mx k(t, s) t [,b] t [,]

76 XIYU LIU ND BOQING YN mx t [,] k(t, s)ds mx{v() up, u(b) where m(, b) = min{ u(b) u(), v() v() }, nd the opertor I mps R+ P (, b) into P (, b) nd is completely continuous. Proof. It is stright forwrd. Now we will list the conditions used in this section. f(,t,x) (F): x x λ, uniformly for t (, ) nd λ u()v() mx p(t) <. t [,] f(λ,t,x) F(): x,λ λ x λ (λ ), uniformly for t (, ), where λ (λ )C(, b) >, C(, b) = m(, b) mx{v() up, u(b) vp}, nd λ > is rbitrry. f(λ,t,x) (F3): x x λ 3, uniformly for λ R +, t (, ) where λ 3 C(, b) >. (F4): f(λ, t, x) = +, uniformly for x [x, x ], t (, ), nd λ + x, x >. f(λ,t,x) (F5): x λ 5, uniformly for t (, ), where λ 5 C(, b) >. x,λ + Lemm 3.. Let (F)(F) be stisfied. Then conditions (H)(H) re vlid. Proof. Choose r > such tht f(, t, x) (λ +ε)x for x < r. Then for x < r we hve I(, x) uvpf(, s, x)ds (λ + ε) x Thus condition (H) is true. Similrly choose r > such tht f(λ, t, x) (λ (λ ) ε)x for λ λ < r, x < r. Then for λ λ < r, x < r, x P (, b) we hve (λ (λ ) ε) I(λ, x)(t) = k(t, s)f(λ, s, x)ds k(t, s)x(s)ds (λ (λ ) ε)m(, b) x vp} uvp k(t, s)ds Lemm 3.3. Let (F) (F5) be stisfied. Then conditions (H) (H5) re vlid. Proof. () Let R > such tht f(λ, t, x) (λ 3 ε)x for x R, λ. Then for x P (, b), x > we hve R m(.b) I(λ, x)(t) k(t, s)f(λ, s, x)ds

STRUCTURE OF SOLUTIONS OF BOUNDRY VLUE PROBLEMS 763 (λ 3 ε) k(t, s)x(s)ds (λ 3 ε)m(, b) x k(t, s)ds () Let x P (, b), ε x ε. Then for t (, b) we hve εm(, b) x(t) ε. Let λ > such tht f(λ, t, x) > T for λ > λ, εm(, b) x ε. Then I(λ, x)(t) k(t, s)f(λ, s, x)ds T k(t, s)ds (3) Let f(λ, t, x) (λ 5 ε)x for x < r, λ > λ. Then for λ > λ, x < r we hve (λ 5 ε) I(λ, x)(t) k(t, s)f(λ, s, x)ds k(t, s)x(s)ds (λ 5 ε)m(, b) x k(t, s)ds Theorem 3.. Suppose tht (F)(F) re stisfied. Then the continuum C contining (, ) of the solution set of problem (3.) hs the following properties. (i) C contins connected closed subset C + [(, ) (P \{})] ({} P ). (ii) λ = is the bifurction point of I if f(λ, t, ). (iii) There exists λ > such tht [{λ} (P \{})] C + for λ (, λ ). Theorem 3.. Suppose tht (F) (F5) re stisfied. Then the continuum C of contining (, ) hs the following properties. (i) C contins connected closed subset C + [(, ) (P \{})] ({} P ). (ii) λ = is the bifurction point of I if f(λ, t, ). (iii) C + meets {} (P \{}). (iv) There exists λ > such tht problem (3.) hs t lest two nontrivil solutions for λ (, λ ). Corollry 3.. Let f(λ, t, x) = λg(t, x) + h(t, x) where g, h : [, ] R + R + re continuous nd g(t, x) > for t [, ], x >. If h(t, x) g(t, x) h(t, x) =, = +, = + x x x x x + x Uniformly for t [, ], then the conclusions of Theorem 3. 3. hold. Now we consider more specil type of utonomous problems, nmely { x (t) = λg (x(t)) + h (x(s)), t (, ) x() = x() =, x C[, ] (3.5)

764 XIYU LIU ND BOQING YN where g, h C [, ), g() = h() =, g (x), h (x) > for x >. Let λ nd x be nontrivil solution to (3.5); i.e.; x(t) > for t (, ), nd x = x(t) =, x(ω) =. Then x (t) for t (, ω) nd x (t) for mx t [,] t (ω, ). By integrtion we hve Hence x (t) = λg(x) + h(x) λg() h() x (t) = ö λg(x) h(x) + λg() + h() where ö= for t (, ω) nd ö= for t (ω, ). Write F,λ (x) = E(λ, ) = x du λ(g() g(u)) + (h() h(u)), x (, ] (3.6) x λ (t) = { F,λ (t), t (, ω) F,λ ( t), t (ω, ) (3.7) du λ(g() g(u)) + (h() h(u)), > (3.8) If x is nontrivil solution of (3.5), then by (3.7) we know ω =. Thus we hve the following: Lemm 3.4. Let λ nd x be nontrivil solution of (3.5), then E(λ, x ) =. Conversely, if there exists λ, > such tht E(λ, ) =, then x λ is solution of (3.5), where x λ is determined by (3.7). Lemm 3.5. E : R + (, ) (, ) is continuous function. Moreover, E is strictly decresing with respect to λ. Proof. Let u = t, then E(λ, ) = λ(g() g(t)) + (h() h(t)) dt, > (3.9) Thus for t (, ) by the men vlue theorem we hve λ(g() g(t)) + (h() h(t)) = λg (θ + ( θ )t) + h (θ + ( θ )t) t C() t where θ, θ [, ] nd C() is constnt. Hence E(λ, ) is continuous.

STRUCTURE OF SOLUTIONS OF BOUNDRY VLUE PROBLEMS 765 g Lemm 3.6. Suppose (x) x x = +. Then dt = + g() g(t) Proof. Note tht g increses, hence we hve θ such tht dt g() g(t) θ g (θ ) g (θ ) g() g( ) Similrly we hve t θ such tht dt g() g(t) θ dt t g (θ ) dt g (θ ) t Let M >, > be such tht g () > M for < <. Consequently dt g() g(t) M dt t Lemm 3.7. Suppose h (x) x + x = +. Then dt = + h() h(t)

766 XIYU LIU ND BOQING YN Proof. Similr to the proof of Lemm 3.6, we hve h() h(t) dt dt = h() h( ) h (θ ) h() h(t) dt h (θ ) t Theorem 3.3. Suppose tht the following conditions re stisfied h (x) g (x) = +, = + (3.) x + x x x Then there exists λ (, ) such tht problem (3.5) hs t lest two nontrivil solutions for < λ < λ, nd no nontrivil solutions for λ > λ. Proof. By Lemm 3.5 3.7 we know tht E(λ, ) is continuous with respect to, E(λ, ) > for >, nd for fixed λ >, E(λ, ) = E(λ, ) =. Let > be such tht for > + h() h(t) dt < ε Then E(λ, ) < ε for >. Let C > be such tht h() h(t) dt C, < + Then E(λ, ) C λ for <. Hence E(λ, ) = uniformly for λ >. s result, eqution E(λ, ) = hs no solutions for λ lrge enough. In order to consider continu of the solution set, we need the following lemm. Let, C, C + be s before, nd Ω = {(λ, ) R : E(λ, ) =, λ, > }. Lemm 3.8. Let S E be closed nd connected subset of. Denote S R = {(λ, x ) : (λ, x) S E }. Then S E is closed nd connected in R. Conversely, if S R Ω is closed nd connected. Let S E = {(λ, x λ ) : x λ is determined by (3.7)}. Then S R is closed nd connected in R + E.

STRUCTURE OF SOLUTIONS OF BOUNDRY VLUE PROBLEMS 767 Proof. It suffices to note tht the following mps re continuous, where x λ is determined by (3.7). R + E R : (λ, x) (λ, x ) Ω R + E : (λ, ) (λ, x λ ) Theorem 3.4. Suppose (3.) is stisfied, then there exist λ, > such tht \((, ) {}) [, λ ] B R, nd ny continuum of will either meet {} P twice, or lie in {} P. Proof. By the proof of Theorem 3.3 we know there exists λ > such tht E(λ, ) 4 for λ > λ, >. By Lemm 3.7 there exists > such tht E(λ, ) 4 for λ, >. Therefore Ω [, λ ] [, ], \((, ) {}) [, λ ] B R. Let Ω = { > : E(, ) > }. Then Ω is n open set composed of open intervls. Let J Ω be one of its mximl open intervls, then the implicit function theorem implies tht there exists continuous curve λ = λ() : J [, λ ] such tht E(λ(), ) =. Hence {(λ(), ) : J} Ω is connected. Let (λ, x), λ >, then (, x ) Ω since E(λ, ) is strictly decresing with respect to λ. Theorem 3.5. Suppose the following conditions re stisfied h (x) h (x) g (x) =, = +, = + (3.) x x x + x x x xh (x) h(x)is strictly incresing for x > (3.) Then = C nd C + meets {} P exctly twice. Proof. By Theorem 3. nd Corollry 3. we know tht C + meets {} (P \{}). Thus by Lemm 3.4, (iii) of Theorem 3. nd Corollry 3. there exists λ > with E(λ, x λ ) =, where (λ, x λ) C +, < λ < λ. By Lemm 3.5 we know E(, x λ ) > for < λ < λ. Hence (, λ ) Ω. Thus by Lemm 3.4 we need only to prove tht E(, ) is strictly decresing. In fct, let t (, ), φ() = h() h(t), then by (3.) 3 φ () = h () h() + h(t) th (t) >, t (, ) Hence φ() is strictly incresing, nd E(, ) = [ h() h(t) ] dt is strictly decresing. Therefore Ω is n open intervl.

768 XIYU LIU ND BOQING YN Corollry 3.. Consider problem (.) in the sclr cse, i.e., x = λx q + x p, t (, ) x(t) >, t (, ) x() = x() =, (3.3) with < q < < p. Then ll the conclusions of Theorem 3. 3.5 hold for (3.3). cknowledgements.the finl version of this work is ccomplished while the first uthor is visiting Institute of Mthemtics, cdemi Sinic. The uthor is grteful to Professor Shujie Li for his hospitlity. References [] mbrosetti., Brezis H., nd Cermi C., Combined effects of concve nd convex nonlinerities in some problems, J. Func. nlysis,, No.4,(994), 59 543. [] Ruyun M, On conjecture concerning the multiplicity of positive solutions of elliptic problems, Nonliner nl., 7, No.7,(996), 775 78. [3] Guo Djun nd Lkshmiknthm, Nonliner Problems in bstrct Cones, cdemic Press, Orlndo, FL(988). [4] Rbinowitz, Some globl results for nonliner eigenvlue problems, J. Func. nlysis, 7, (97), 487 53. [5] mnn H., Fixed point equtions nd nonliner eigenvlue problems in ordered Bnch spces, SIM Review, 8, No.4,(976), 6 79. [6] Liu Xiyu, Structure of solutions of some singulr opertors with pplictions to impulsive integrodifferentil boundry vlue problems, SUT J. Mth., 3, No.,(996), 9. [7] Liu Xiyu, Some existence nd nonexistence principles for clss of singulr boundry vlue problems, Nonl. nl., 7, No.,(996), 47 64. Received June 3, 997 Revised version received November 6, 997 Finl version for publiction received ugust 3, 999 (Xiyu Liu) Deprtment of Mthemtics, Shndong Norml University, Ji-Nn, Shndong 54, People s Republic of Chin E-mil ddress: Yliu@jn-public.sd.cninfo.net (Current ddress) Deprtment of Computer Sciences, School of Informtion nd Mngement, Shndong Norml University, Ji-Nn, Shndong 54, People s Republic of Chin (Boqing Yn) Deprtment of Mthemtics, Shndong Norml University Ji-Nn, Shndong 54, People s Republic of Chin E-mil ddress: ynbq@sdnu.edu.cn