Solutions to exam : 1FA352 Quantum Mechanics 10 hp 1

Similar documents
Quantum Mechanics Solutions

8.05 Quantum Physics II, Fall 2011 FINAL EXAM Thursday December 22, 9:00 am -12:00 You have 3 hours.

Approximation Methods in QM

Quantum Mechanics II Lecture 11 ( David Ritchie

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours.

Physics 139B Solutions to Homework Set 4 Fall 2009

Problem 1: Spin 1 2. particles (10 points)

Quantum Computing Lecture 3. Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Anuj Dawar

Time Independent Perturbation Theory Contd.

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 6

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Department of Physics College Park, Maryland. PHYSICS Ph.D. QUALIFYING EXAMINATION PART II

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2008 Final Exam Solutions

Quantum Mechanics II

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

Physics 580: Quantum Mechanics I Department of Physics, UIUC Fall Semester 2017 Professor Eduardo Fradkin

General Exam Part II, Fall 1998 Quantum Mechanics Solutions

PHY 407 QUANTUM MECHANICS Fall 05 Problem set 1 Due Sep

Addition of Angular Momenta

Mathematical Tripos Part IB Michaelmas Term Example Sheet 1. Values of some physical constants are given on the supplementary sheet

Time dependent perturbation theory 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon 11 May 2012

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

PHYSICS DEPARTMENT, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PHYSICS 505 FINAL EXAMINATION. January 18, 2013, 1:30 4:30pm, A06 Jadwin Hall SOLUTIONS

( r) = 1 Z. e Zr/a 0. + n +1δ n', n+1 ). dt ' e i ( ε n ε i )t'/! a n ( t) = n ψ t = 1 i! e iε n t/! n' x n = Physics 624, Quantum II -- Exam 1

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 5

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Department of Physics College Park, Maryland. PHYSICS Ph.D. QUALIFYING EXAMINATION PART II

In the following, we investigate the time-dependent two-component wave function ψ(t) = ( )

Physics 139B Solutions to Homework Set 5 Fall 2009

ECEN 5005 Crystals, Nanocrystals and Device Applications Class 20 Group Theory For Crystals

Lecture 4 Quantum mechanics in more than one-dimension

Chemistry 120A 2nd Midterm. 1. (36 pts) For this question, recall the energy levels of the Hydrogenic Hamiltonian (1-electron):

Non-relativistic scattering

Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals

Ket space as a vector space over the complex numbers

Lecture #1. Review. Postulates of quantum mechanics (1-3) Postulate 1

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 14 Coupling of Angular Momenta

Chem 442 Review for Exam 2. Exact separation of the Hamiltonian of a hydrogenic atom into center-of-mass (3D) and relative (3D) components.

Implications of Time-Reversal Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics

(a) Write down the total Hamiltonian of this system, including the spin degree of freedom of the electron, but neglecting spin-orbit interactions.

Angular momentum. Quantum mechanics. Orbital angular momentum

Graduate Quantum Mechanics I: Prelims and Solutions (Fall 2015)

does not change the dynamics of the system, i.e. that it leaves the Schrödinger equation invariant,

Single Electron Atoms

LECTURES ON QUANTUM MECHANICS

Preliminary Examination - Day 1 Thursday, August 9, 2018

Collection of formulae Quantum mechanics. Basic Formulas Division of Material Science Hans Weber. Operators

Chm 331 Fall 2015, Exercise Set 4 NMR Review Problems

Qualifying Exam. Aug Part II. Please use blank paper for your work do not write on problems sheets!

Goal: find Lorentz-violating corrections to the spectrum of hydrogen including nonminimal effects

PHY413 Quantum Mechanics B Duration: 2 hours 30 minutes

Lecture 4 Quantum mechanics in more than one-dimension

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department

Physics 221A Fall 2017 Notes 20 Parity

Classical field theory 2012 (NS-364B) Feynman propagator

Quantum Mechanics FKA081/FIM400 Final Exam 28 October 2015

QUANTUM MECHANICS. Franz Schwabl. Translated by Ronald Kates. ff Springer

Intro to Nuclear and Particle Physics (5110)

Physics 828 Problem Set 7 Due Wednesday 02/24/2010

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics

Quantization of the E-M field

1 Commutators (10 pts)

Ch 125a Problem Set 1

Sommerfeld (1920) noted energy levels of Li deduced from spectroscopy looked like H, with slight adjustment of principal quantum number:

IV. Electronic Spectroscopy, Angular Momentum, and Magnetic Resonance


Angular Momentum. Classical. J r p. radius vector from origin. linear momentum. determinant form of cross product iˆ xˆ J J J J J J

Optical Lattices. Chapter Polarization

5.111 Lecture Summary #6

J10M.1 - Rod on a Rail (M93M.2)

Solution Exercise 12

5.4 Given the basis e 1, e 2 write the matrices that represent the unitary transformations corresponding to the following changes of basis:

Chapter 6: SYMMETRY IN QUANTUM MECHANICS

Physics 70007, Fall 2009 Answers to Final Exam

Lectures on Quantum Mechanics

ψ s a ˆn a s b ˆn b ψ Hint: Because the state is spherically symmetric the answer can depend only on the angle between the two directions.

ONE AND MANY ELECTRON ATOMS Chapter 15

Notes on Quantum Mechanics

University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Physics. Quantum Mechanics Qualifying Examination. January 7, 2013 (Tuesday) 9:00 am - 12:00 noon

Cold molecules: Theory. Viatcheslav Kokoouline Olivier Dulieu

Lecture Notes. Quantum Theory. Prof. Maximilian Kreuzer. Institute for Theoretical Physics Vienna University of Technology. covering the contents of

16.1. PROBLEM SET I 197

Total Angular Momentum for Hydrogen

Physics 228 Today: Ch 41: 1-3: 3D quantum mechanics, hydrogen atom

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2004 Assignment 3

Final Examination. Tuesday December 15, :30 am 12:30 pm. particles that are in the same spin state 1 2, + 1 2

GROUP THEORY IN PHYSICS

量子力学 Quantum mechanics. School of Physics and Information Technology

The rotation group and quantum mechanics 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon 30 January 2012

20 The Hydrogen Atom. Ze2 r R (20.1) H( r, R) = h2 2m 2 r h2 2M 2 R

UGC ACADEMY LEADING INSTITUE FOR CSIR-JRF/NET, GATE & JAM PH 05 PHYSICAL SCIENCE TEST SERIES # 1. Quantum, Statistical & Thermal Physics

Decays, resonances and scattering

Coupling of Angular Momenta Isospin Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction

INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS by Lawrence R. Mead, Prof. Physics, USM

3. Quantum Mechanics in 3D

Lecture 11 Spin, orbital, and total angular momentum Mechanics. 1 Very brief background. 2 General properties of angular momentum operators

Lecture: Scattering theory

( ) in the interaction picture arises only

LSU Dept. of Physics and Astronomy Qualifying Exam Quantum Mechanics Question Bank (07/2017) =!2 π 2 a cos π x

Semi-Classical Theory of Radiative Transitions

Physics 215 Quantum Mechanics I Assignment 8

Schrödinger equation for the nuclear potential

Transcription:

Solutions to exam 6--6: FA35 Quantum Mechanics hp Problem (4 p): (a) Define the concept of unitary operator and show that the operator e ipa/ is unitary (p is the momentum operator in one dimension) (b) Show that e ipa/ x is an eigenstate to the position operator What is the eigenvalue? Hint: Consider [x, e ipa/ ] (a) An operator U is unitary if it satisfies U U = UU = With U = e ipa/ where p is Hermitian, it follows that U = e ipa/ and, therefore, U U = e ipa/ e ipa/ = = e ipa/ e ipa/ = UU (b) With the position operator x x = x x, we should demonstrate that x e ipa/ x = C e ipa/ x where C is the eigenvalue: x e ipa/ x = {[x, e ipa/ ] + e ipa/ x} x = ( using [x i, F ( p)] = i F p i from the collection of formulae ) = i eipa/ x + e ipa/ x x = i ia p eipa/ x + e ipa/ x x = ( a + x )e ipa/ x, ie eigenstate of x with eigenvalue x a This means a translation by a, which is in accordance with e ipa/ being the translation operator Problem (4 p): Consider the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator: states n, energies E n = ω(n + ) (a) Show that the expectation value n x n = for all n (b) Construct the state α = c + c that makes α x α as large as possible (c, c can be chosen real) (c) With the oscillator in state α at time t =, derive the state vector (in Schrödinger picture) for t > and calculate the expectation value α x α as a function of time (a) Using x = mω (a+a ) and a n = n n, a n = n + n+ (from collection of formulae) one obtains n x n = mω n a+a ( ) n = mω n n n + n + n n + = due to orthonormality m n = δ mn of the energy eigenstates of the harmonic oscillator In words, operator x is given by creation and annihilation operators that shift the state n to n ± which is orthogonal to n, giving zero expectation value (b) x = α x α = (c + c )x(c + c ) = c c x + c c x + c c x + c c x Using x, a, a as in (a) one obtains x = mω (c c + c c ) = c mω c, where in the last step the normalisation condition c + c = has been used together with c, c real since a complex phase does not affect the following Maximum of x is then obtained by d x /dc = giving c = / (maximum since d x /dc < for c = / ), and then c = / Hence x max = /mω for α = ( + )/ (up to an overall phase factor) (c): Applying the time evolution operator e iht/, and using e iht/ n = e iω(n+/)t n, one gets α, t = e iht/ α, t = = e iht/ ( + )/ = (e iωt/ + e 3iωt/ )/ as the state vector for t > in the Schrödinger picture The expectation value is then α, t x α, t = / (e iωt/ +e 3iωt/ )x(e iωt/ +e 3iωt/ )/ = ( x +e iωt x + e iωt x + x )/ = (again using x a + a as in (a)) = /mω cos ωt

Solutions to exam 6--6: FA35 Quantum Mechanics hp Problem 3 (4 p): (a) Derive the relation m m j j ; m m j j ; jm = for Clebsch-Gordan coefficients and comment on its physical interpretation (b) An electron is in a p-orbital (l = ) Give, with motivations/explanations, all possible states jm of total angular momentum j of the electron, expressed in terms of its spin and orbital angular momentum (a) When combining two angular momenta j, j, the new states with total angular momentum j can be expressed (using the completeness relation) as j j ; j, m = m m j j ; m m j j ; m m j j ; j, m in the old direct-product basis Multiplying with j j ; jm gives the left-hand side j j ; jm j j ; jm = and the right-hand side m m j j ; jm j j ; m m j j ; m m j j ; jm = m m j j ; m m j j ; jm, ie the desired relation is obtained Since the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients are the expansion coefficients of the new j j ; jm basis states in the old direct-product basis, the given relation expresses the conservation of probability, ie the sum of squared amplitude coefficients should be unity (b) Add orbital angular momentum l = (m l =,,,) and spin angular momentum s = / (m s = /, /) to total angular momentum j = l s,, l + s = /, 3/ (m j = j, j +, j, j for j = / and j = 3/, resp) and m j = m l + m s Express new states (eigenstates to L, S, J, J z ) as linear combinations in old direct product basis (eigenstates to L, S, L z, S z ) using change of basis via completeness relation: l, s; j, m j = m l m s l, s; m l, m s l, s; m l, m s l, s; j, m j, where the scalar products are the expansion coefficients called Clebsch-Gordan coefficients Reading them from the table gives (suppressing l, s): j = 3, m j = + 3 = m l = +, m s = + j = 3, m j = + = +, +, + j =, m 3 3 j = + = +,, + 3 3 j = 3, m j = =, +, + j =, m 3 3 j = =,, + 3 3 j = 3, m j = 3 = m l =, m s = Here one should note the orthogonality between all states, in particular those on the same line due to the relative + and signs To derive all these states, one starts with the extreme state j = 3, m j = + 3 = m l = +, m s = + with coefficient (chosen real by convention) since only possibility is maximum m l and m s Then one operates with ladder operators J = L +S on respective sides giving j = 3, m j = + = above Iterating with the ladder operators gives the following states with j = 3/ The state j =, m j = + is then constructed to be orthogonal to j = 3, m j = + and have sum of squared coefficients equal unity The ladder operators are then iteratively applied to get the remaining j = / states Problem 4 (5 p): A hydrogen atom in its ground state nlm = is at time t = placed in a time-dependent electric field E(t) = E ẑ exp( t/τ) along ẑ direction, with E the field strength (a) In first-order time-dependent perturbation theory, which ones of the excited states lm are accessible in a direct transition? Motivate your answer (b) Calculate the transition probability from the ground state to these excited states You do not need to perform the radial integral, but perform all other integrals Hint: Energy levels: E n = e a ; Bohr radius: a n = ; Y me (θ, φ) =

Solutions to exam 6--6: FA35 Quantum Mechanics hp 3 (a) The perturbation is an electric field E(t) along the ẑ direction, which gives a perturbation potential dependent on z, V (t) = ee z exp( t/τ), using the potential in electrodynamics The initial state is and the final states are lm, with l =, and m =,, + The transition amplitudes in the zero th and first order are c () (t) = δ, c () lm (t) = i t with the difference in the energy levels is ω = E E elements of the perturbation dt e iω t V lm, (t ), = e ( 3e a ) = 4 8a V lm, (t ) = lm ( ee ) ze t /τ = ee e t /τ lm z and the matrix The possible transitions from to lm are the ones where the matrix elements of the operator z are non-zero The parity of the z operator is odd and lm states (or Yl m ) have parity ( ) l, which excludes transition from to states with even l Moreover, z is the zero-component of a rank- spherical tensor (z Y ), so the Wigner-Ekhardt theorem applies and gives the selection rules l = l ± and m = m Therefore, the only non-zero matrix element is z (which can also be obtained by detailed inspection of the polar angle integrals) Thus, the only direct transition in first-order perturbation theory is (b) We calculate the matrix element z using the position representation and write the wave function in spherical coordinates Ψ nlm (x) = x nlm = R nl (r) Yl m (θ, φ), z = d 3 x Ψ (x) z Ψ (x) = d 3 x R (r)y (θ, φ) z R (r)y (θ, φ) = r drdω R (r)y (θ, φ) r cos θ R (r)y (θ, φ) = dr r R (r)r (r) dω Y (θ, φ) cos θy (θ, φ) where we have separated the radial part and the angular part The radial integral does not need to be estimated and we can denote it I r = dr r R (r)r (r) = = 4 6 a ( 3) 5 The angular integral can be estimated using the spherical harmonics Y and Y π 3 I θ,φ = dω Y (θ, φ) cos θy (θ, φ) = dφ d(cos θ) cos θ cos θ 3 = π d(cos θ) cos θ = 3 The transition amplitude to first order is c () (t) = i = i ( ee ) t t dt e iω t V, (t ) = i t dt e iω t ( ee ) e t /τ z dt e iω t e t /τ I r I θ,φ = iee exp(iω t t ) τ iω I r I θ,φ τ The transition probability for is finally given by ( ) P (t) = c () (t) ee [ ] = + e t τ e t τ cos(ω t) ω + Ir 3 τ

Solutions to exam 6--6: FA35 Quantum Mechanics hp 4 Problem 5 (4 p): Consider the elastic scattering of particles, with mass m and wave vector k, on an atom represented by a 3D δ-potential V (x) = V δ(x), with V > (a) Calculate the differential scattering cross-section and the total scattering cross-section using the Born approximation (b) Perform the same calculations for a molecule represented by a double δ-potential V (x) = V (δ(x + R) + δ(x R)), where R k (a) The scattering amplitude in Born approximation is given by f () (k, k) = m (π) 3 k V k = m d 3 x e i(k k) x V (x ) Using the single δ-potential V (x) = V δ(x), the expression becomes f () (k, k) = m d 3 x e i(k k) x ( V )δ(x ) = m V k) ei(k = mv π The differential scattering cross-section and the total scattering cross-section become ( ) dσ dω = f () (k, k) mv =, σ π tot = dω dσ ( ) dω = mv σ π atom (b) Using the double δ-potential V (x) = V (δ(x + R) + δ(x R)), the amplitude is f () (k, k) = m d 3 x e i(k k) x ( V )(δ(x +R)+δ(x R)) = m V ( ) e i(k k) R + e i(k k) R With the notation that θ = (k, k) and considering that R k, the scattering amplitude becomes f () (k, k) = mv π ( e ikr( cos θ) + e ikr( cos θ)) The differential scattering cross-section becomes ( ) dσ dω = f () (k, k) mv ( = + e ikr( cos θ) + e ikr( cos θ)), π and the total scattering cross-section after performing the angular integrals is σ tot = dω dσ dω = π d(cos θ) dσ ( ) ( dω = mv + sin(4kr) ) π 4kR Finally, we note that ( σ molecule = σ atom + sin(4kr) ) 4kR

Solutions to exam 6--6: FA35 Quantum Mechanics hp 5 Problem 6 (3 p): To determine possible violation of the Bell inequality, one needs to evaluate expectation values of operators on the form a σ b σ, where a = (a x, a y, a z ) and b = (b x, b y, b z ) are unit vectors and σ= (σ x, σ y, σ z ) are Pauli matrices Suppose Alice and Bob share the Bell state Φ + = ( + ) (a) Calculate the expectation value Φ + a σ b σ Φ + (b) Suppose these are spin / states and Alice decides to measure S z, ie she chooses her vector a = (,, ) Which measurement must Bob choose to get a maximum expectation value? (a) With the notation a = (a x, a y, a z ) and b = (b x, b y, b z ) we can calculate the expectation value using the properties of the Pauli matrices σ x, σ y, σ z Φ + a σ b σ Φ + = ( + )(a σ b σ)( + ) = ( a σ b σ + a σ b σ ) + a σ b σ + a σ b σ = [ a z b z + (a x ia y ) (b x ib y ) ] + (a x + ia y ) (b x + ib y ) + ( a z ) ( b z ) = a x b x a y b y + a z b z Here we made use of a σ = a x σ x + a y σ y + a z σ z = a z, and so on (b) If Alice measures S z, then a x =, a y =, a z =, in which case the expectation value becomes Φ + a σ b σ Φ + = b z The maximum value is, when Bob also measures S z, ie b = (,, ) Simply put, this corresponds to the case where Alice and Bob measure S z on entangled spins and discover their measurements are fully correlated