Use of Ultra-High Performance Concrete in Geotechnical and Substructure Applications

Similar documents
This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.

INTERFACE STRESSES BETWEEN SOIL AND LARGE DIAMETER DRILLED SHAFT UNDER LATERAL LOADING

Lesson 25. Static Pile Load Testing, O-cell, and Statnamic. Reference Manual Chapter 18

INCREASE IN PILE CAPACITY WITH TIME IN MISSOURI RIVER ALLUVIUM

Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Interpretation

Experimental Investigation of Interface Stresses between Soil and Laterally Loaded Shaft

ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED FIXED HEADED SINGLE FLOATING PILE IN MULTILAYERED SOIL USING BEF APPROACH

Liquefaction and Foundations

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF ARKANSAS TEST SERIES PILE #2 USING OPENSEES (WITH LPILE COMPARISON)

Jose Brito, Cenor, Portugal

Type approval granted by the Finnish Ministry of the Environment

Table 3. Empirical Coefficients for BS 8002 equation. A (degrees) Rounded Sub-angular. 2 Angular. B (degrees) Uniform Moderate grading.

NEW DOWN-HOLE PENETROMETER (DHP-CIGMAT) FOR CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS

BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION

CPT Data Interpretation Theory Manual

EFFECT OF SOIL TYPE LOCATION ON THE LATERALLY LOADED SINGLE PILE

Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration

S E C T I O N 1 2 P R O D U C T S E L E C T I O N G U I D E - H E L I C A L S C R E W P I L E F O U N D A T I O N S

Analysis of the horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile

K Design Graphs and Charts for Raft Foundations Spanning Local Depressions

CPT: Geopractica Contracting (Pty) Ltd Total depth: m, Date:

Assessment of Calculation Procedures for Piles in Clay based on Static Loading Tests Anders Hust Augustesen

MECE 3321 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS CHAPTER 3

LOAD RESISTANCE FACTOR DESIGN (LRFD) FOR DRIVEN PILES BASED ON DYNAMIC METHODS WITH ASSESSMENT OF SKIN AND TIP RESISTANCE FROM PDA SIGNALS

Analysis of Pile Foundation Subjected to Lateral and Vertical Loads

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown?

Congreso Internacional de Fundaciones Profundas de Bolivia Santa Cruz, Bolivia, 12 al 15 de Mayo de 2015 Day 1: Software Demonstrations

Implementation of Laterally Loaded Piles in Multi-Layer Soils

Experimental Study on The Seismic Assessment of Pile Foundation in Volcanic Ash Ground

Implementation of Pile Setup in the LRFD Design of Driven Piles in Louisiana

Verification of a Micropile Foundation

Clayey sand (SC)

CPT: _CPTU1. GEOTEA S.R.L. Via della Tecnica 57/A San Lazzaro di Savena (BO)

Solid Mechanics Homework Answers

Chapter 7: Settlement of Shallow Foundations

Appendix K Design Examples

Appendix J. Example of Proposed Changes

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Sample Problem 4.2

Design of RC Retaining Walls

Evaluation of short piles bearing capacity subjected to lateral loading in sandy soil

= 50 ksi. The maximum beam deflection Δ max is not = R B. = 30 kips. Notes for Strength of Materials, ET 200

INTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS PDPI 2013

1 of 7. Law of Sines: Stress = E = G. Deformation due to Temperature: Δ

Engineeringmanuals. Part2

Theory of Shear Strength

Comparison of Static and Dynamic Pile Load Tests at Thi Vai International Port in Viet Nam

Part 1 is to be completed without notes, beam tables or a calculator. DO NOT turn Part 2 over until you have completed and turned in Part 1.

Liquefaction Induced Negative Skin Friction from Blast-induced Liquefaction Tests with Auger-cast Piles

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PILES IN SAND BASED ON SOIL-PILE INTERACTION

Maximum Envelope of Lateral Resistance through Dynamic Increasing Energy Test in Piles

PILE SETUP LA-1 EXPERIENCE. Ching-Nien Tsai, P.E.

vulcanhammer.info the website about Vulcan Iron Works Inc. and the pile driving equipment it manufactured Terms and Conditions of Use:

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

Experimental Lab. Principles of Superposition

8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses.

Load Capacity Evaluation of Pennsylvania s Single Span T-Beam Bridges

(C) Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management

INDOT/Purdue Pile Driving Method for Estimation of Axial Capacity

Transmission Line Design Structures & Foundations TADP 549

Experimental Investigation of Steel Pipe Pile to Concrete Cap Connections

Deep Foundations 2. Load Capacity of a Single Pile

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

CPT Guide 5 th Edition. CPT Applications - Deep Foundations. Gregg Drilling & Testing, Inc. Dr. Peter K. Robertson Webinar # /2/2013

DYNAMIC CENTRIFUGE TEST OF PILE FOUNDATION STRUCTURE PART TWO : BEHAVIOR OF STRUCTURE AND GROUND DURING EXTREME EARTHQUAKE CONDITIONS

In-class Exercise. Problem: Select load factors for the Strength I and Service I Limit States for the. Loading Diagram for Student Exercise

Reliability of Settlement Analysis for Shallow Foundations

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture

Flexible Pavement Stress Analysis

Solution: The moment of inertia for the cross-section is: ANS: ANS: Problem 15.6 The material of the beam in Problem

1 of 12. Law of Sines: Stress = E = G. Deformation due to Temperature: Δ

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

Steel Cross Sections. Structural Steel Design

PILE LOAD TEST IN OLD ALLUVIUM

Civil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx

LRFD Application in Driven Piles (Recent Development in Pavement & Geotech at LTRC)

Introduction to Structural Member Properties

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Martin Achmus Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower Engineering. Monopile design

Effective stress analysis of pile foundations in liquefiable soil

Understanding Dynamic Pile Testing and Driveability

EVALUATION OF STRENGTH OF SOILS AGAINST LIQUEFACTION USING PIEZO DRIVE CONE

Seismic Fragility Analysis of Highway Bridges. Sponsored by Mid-America Earthquake Center Technical Report MAEC RR-4 Project

Nonlinear pushover analysis for pile foundations

Evaluation of Geotechnical Hazards

3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties

THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF PILE FOUNDATIONS BASED ON LRFD FOR JAPANESE HIGHWAYS

Gapping effects on the lateral stiffness of piles in cohesive soil

2004 OpenSees User Workshop. OpenSees. Geotechnical Capabilities and Applications. (U.C. San Diego) Roadmap

Minnesota Department of Transportation Geotechnical Section Cone Penetration Test Index Sheet 1.0 (CPT 1.0)

Additional Pile Design Considerations

Verification of Signal Matching Analysis of Pile Driving Using a Finite Difference Based Continuum Numerical Method

CPT Pore Water Pressure Correlations with PDA to Identify Pile Drivability Problem

Lateral impact loading and snap-back testing to estimate linear and nonlinear dynamic response of near-shore piles

B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

DETAILED INVESTIGATION OF PILES DAMAGED BY HYOGOKEN NAMBU EARTHQUAKE

IN SITU TESTING TECHNOLOGY FOR FOUNDATION & EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING. Wesley Spang, Ph.D., P.E. AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc.

Ch 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing

TC211 Workshop CALIBRATION OF RIGID INCLUSION PARAMETERS BASED ON. Jérôme Racinais. September 15, 2015 PRESSUMETER TEST RESULTS

CHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY

Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

Transcription:

Use of Ultra-High Performance Concrete in Geotechnical and Substructure Applications i PI: Muhannad Suleiman Co-PI: Sri Sritharan Graduate Research Assistant: Thomas L. Vande Voort January 13, 29 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY

Research Funding Seed funding received from IHRB for a highrisk, high-reward project that can lead to substantive advancements in highway transportation 2

Objectives Demonstrate the potential use of UHPC in geotechnical applications Evaluate the behavior of UHPC piles using large-scale tests and analytical procedures

Motivation Grand d Challenges issued by AASHTO 25: Extending service life of bridges to 75 years with minimal maintenance Optimizing structural systems using new materials Piles made of conventional materials have suffered damage

Why UHPC? Property UHPC HPC Normal Concrete Compressive Strength 26-3 ksi 12-18 ksi 4-8 ksi Tensile Strength 1.7 ksi.8-.9 ksi.3-.7 ksi Elastic Modulus 8 ksi 48-64 ksi 36-51 ksi Durability Up to 4x lower Up to 7x lower 1 arameter Re elative to Normal Con ncrete P.8 6.6.4.2 UH HPC HPC Normal Con ncrete Chloride Ion Penetration Depth PC UH HPC Normal Con ncrete PC UH HPC Oxygen Permeabilty Water Absorption Carbonation Depth (3 years) Normal Con ncrete UHPC HPC Normal Con ncrete PC UH HPC Normal Con ncrete Reinforcement Corrosion Rate

Tasks Conduct a literature review on the use of UHPC in super- and any sub-structural systems related to transportation structures in the United States and abroad Design of UHPC pile section Conduct comparative driveability study for UHPC and other piles Conduct laboratory tests on UHPC pile elements Conduct dynamic tests (PDA/CAPWAP) on UHPC and steel piles Perform large-scale vertical and lateral load tests on UHPC piles

Pile Section Shapes Considered Simple H-Shape X-Shape Tapered H-Shape

Final Section Properties Parameter Steel HP 1 x 57 UHPC Tapered H-Shape Area 16.8 in 2 56.8 in 2 Weight/ft 57.2 lb 61.1 lb Moment of Inertia 294 in 4 795 in 4 Stiffness Term (E I) 8.53 1 6 kip in 2 6.36 1 6 kip in 2

Construction b

Laboratory Testing Cells Top Tilt Gauge Curvature, φ (mm -1 )..2.4.6.8.1 1 DCDTs String Deflection Gauges Moment, M (in k kip) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 Calculated Response Lab Test Measured Data 1 8 6 4 Moment, M (kn m) 2 2 1..5.1.15.2.25.3 Curvature, φ (in -1 )

Field Investigation: US63 Oskaloosa, IA

Site Soil Profile SPT Blow Count (blows/ft) Tip Resistance, q 2 c (ton/ft ) Friction, f 2 s (ton/ft ) Friction Ratio, F r (%) Soil Classification Undrained Shear Strength, s u (psi) 5 1 5 1 2 4 6 8 % 5% 1% 15% Clay 2 4 6 8 1 Friction Angle, φ 2 3 4 5 6 5 Sensitive Fine Grained 5 2 1 1 Clay 4 15 15 Depth (ft) 2 Sand Sandy Silt to Clayey Silt 2 6 Depth (m) 25 Sand to Silty Sand 25 8 3 35 5 Tip Resistance, q c (kpa) 2 4 6 Friction, f s (kpa) 3 Sandy Silt to Clayey Silt Very Stiff 1 Fine Clay Grained 35 36 Gravelly Sand 2 4 6 to Sand Undrained Shear Strength, s u (kpa)

Field Testing Plan Reaction Pile Reaction Beam Reaction Pile Reaction Pile 6.5 ft 6.5 ft 5. ft 4. ft Unit UHPC 1 Steel Pile Reaction Pile Unit UHPC 2

Driving of UHPC and Steel Piles Hammer Leads Pile PDA Accelerometer PDA Strain Gauge

Driving Logs Cum Blows 5 1 15 2 25 3 etration Depth (m) Pen 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Blows/.3m of Steel HP 1x57 Blows/.3 m of UHPC 1 Cum blows for steel HP 1x57 Cum blows for UHPC 1 5 1 15 2 25 h (ft) Pen netration Dept 9 3 1 11 5 1 15 2 25 35 Blows/ ft

Driving

Vertical Load Tests

Load-Displacement Relationship Load (kn) Load (kn) 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18. 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18. 4 8 12 16 2 1.1.2 Extrapolation.3 1.1.2.3 Displacement (mm) Displacement (in.) Displacement (mm) Displace ment (in.) Davi avisson Pile Capacity = 198 Kips 4.4.5.6 4 8 4.4.5.6 Davisson Failure Crit Criterion Davisson son Failure Criterion 7.7 Davisson Pile Capacity = 369 Kips 2 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 12 16 7.7 Load (Kips) Load (Kips) UHPC Steel Pile

Load Transfer Depth (m) Vertical Load (kn) 2 4 6 8 1-1 1 5 2 3 1 4 Ground Surface 5 15 6 2 7 8 25 9 3 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 22 Vertical Load (Kips) Depth (ft) Load (kn) 183.7 27.8 234.4 261.7 292. 313.7 345.2 369.5 396.6 425.7 451.3 477.3 52.7 529.2 554.8 616.6 7.3 79. 876.7

Lateral Load Test

UHPC Pile Lateral Load-Displacement Lateral Displacement (in.) 11 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 24 22 9 2 8 18 Lateral Load (kn) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 UHPC 1 UHPC 2 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 La ateral Load (K Kips) Shear cracks Bundle of wires (a) Bundle of wires 5 1 15 2 25 (b) Lateral Displacement (mm)

UHPC Pile Lateral Load-Displacement Strain (με) De epth (m) -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 4 6 8 1 Ground Surface 15.9 kn 27.9 kn 4.7 kn 55.9 kn 68.8 kn 77.8 kn 92.7 kn 11.2 kn 4 8 12 16 2 24 28 32 epth (ft) D

Questions