On Representability of a Finite Local Ring

Similar documents
Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35

4.1. Paths. For definitions see section 2.1 (In particular: path; head, tail, length of a path; concatenation;

MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA

Integral Extensions. Chapter Integral Elements Definitions and Comments Lemma

A GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF RINGS VIA AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS

Ring Theory Problems. A σ

Topics in Module Theory

12. Projective modules The blanket assumptions about the base ring k, the k-algebra A, and A-modules enumerated at the start of 11 continue to hold.

Groups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order

(1) A frac = b : a, b A, b 0. We can define addition and multiplication of fractions as we normally would. a b + c d

Math 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems

ALGEBRA EXERCISES, PhD EXAMINATION LEVEL

NOTES ON FINITE FIELDS

4.4 Noetherian Rings

Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 3 Due Friday, February 5 at 08:35

REPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEKS 10 11

Homological Methods in Commutative Algebra

REPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS

Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra


REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 9

Solutions to odd-numbered exercises Peter J. Cameron, Introduction to Algebra, Chapter 2

The Proj Construction

Math 120 HW 9 Solutions

ALGEBRA PH.D. QUALIFYING EXAM September 27, 2008

Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings

COHEN-MACAULAY RINGS SELECTED EXERCISES. 1. Problem 1.1.9

BENJAMIN LEVINE. 2. Principal Ideal Domains We will first investigate the properties of principal ideal domains and unique factorization domains.

Projective and Injective Modules

x y B =. v u Note that the determinant of B is xu + yv = 1. Thus B is invertible, with inverse u y v x On the other hand, d BA = va + ub 2

Exercises on chapter 1

De Rham Cohomology. Smooth singular cochains. (Hatcher, 2.1)

IDEAL CLASSES AND RELATIVE INTEGERS

FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS.

Algebra Qualifying Exam Solutions January 18, 2008 Nick Gurski 0 A B C 0

Subrings of Finite Commutative Rings

EXTERIOR AND SYMMETRIC POWERS OF MODULES FOR CYCLIC 2-GROUPS

The Segre Embedding. Daniel Murfet May 16, 2006

Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society

5 Dedekind extensions

Assigned homework problems S. L. Kleiman, fall 2008

Definitions. Notations. Injective, Surjective and Bijective. Divides. Cartesian Product. Relations. Equivalence Relations

A Generalization of VNL-Rings and P P -Rings

INJECTIVE MODULES: PREPARATORY MATERIAL FOR THE SNOWBIRD SUMMER SCHOOL ON COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA

Math 711: Lecture of September 7, Symbolic powers

Noetherian property of infinite EI categories

MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES STEFAN GILLE

Infinite-Dimensional Triangularization

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM SPRING 2012

ELEMENTARY SUBALGEBRAS OF RESTRICTED LIE ALGEBRAS

Math 210B:Algebra, Homework 2

Q N id β. 2. Let I and J be ideals in a commutative ring A. Give a simple description of

Acta Acad. Paed. Agriensis, Sectio Mathematicae 28 (2001) THE LIE AUGMENTATION TERMINALS OF GROUPS. Bertalan Király (Eger, Hungary)

38 Irreducibility criteria in rings of polynomials

MINIMAL FAITHFUL MODULES OVER ARTINIAN RINGS GEORGE M. BERGMAN

MINIMAL NUMBER OF GENERATORS AND MINIMUM ORDER OF A NON-ABELIAN GROUP WHOSE ELEMENTS COMMUTE WITH THEIR ENDOMORPHIC IMAGES

Notes on p-divisible Groups

Math Introduction to Modern Algebra

Universal localization at semiprime Goldie ideals

Finite Fields. [Parts from Chapter 16. Also applications of FTGT]

Chapter 5. Linear Algebra

Pacific Journal of Mathematics

Theorem 5.3. Let E/F, E = F (u), be a simple field extension. Then u is algebraic if and only if E/F is finite. In this case, [E : F ] = deg f u.

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS LINEAR ALGEBRA

INTRO TO TENSOR PRODUCTS MATH 250B

FINITE GROUP THEORY: SOLUTIONS FALL MORNING 5. Stab G (l) =.

Math 120: Homework 6 Solutions

RING ELEMENTS AS SUMS OF UNITS

Rings and groups. Ya. Sysak

Injective Modules and Matlis Duality

4. Noether normalisation

1. Background and motivation

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem

School of Mathematics and Statistics. MT5836 Galois Theory. Handout 0: Course Information

Introduction to modules

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 10.

On some properties of elementary derivations in dimension six

φ(xy) = (xy) n = x n y n = φ(x)φ(y)

TC10 / 3. Finite fields S. Xambó

Homological Dimension

Modules over Principal Ideal Domains

Section 18 Rings and fields

Symplectic representation theory and the Weyl algebra in positive characteristic

1 Fields and vector spaces

ON HOCHSCHILD EXTENSIONS OF REDUCED AND CLEAN RINGS

Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010

HONDA-TATE THEOREM FOR ELLIPTIC CURVES

NOTES ON SPLITTING FIELDS

Problems in Linear Algebra and Representation Theory

COMMUNICATIONS IN ALGEBRA, 15(3), (1987) A NOTE ON PRIME IDEALS WHICH TEST INJECTIVITY. John A. Beachy and William D.

MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12

Appendix Homework and answers

On p-monomial Modules over Local Domains

Category O and its basic properties

How many units can a commutative ring have?

LIFTED CODES OVER FINITE CHAIN RINGS

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III

Lecture 2. (1) Every P L A (M) has a maximal element, (2) Every ascending chain of submodules stabilizes (ACC).

5 Dedekind extensions

Synopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 4. Proposition (4.1.6). The canonical homomorphism ( ) is surjective [(3.2.4)].

Transcription:

Journal of Algebra 228, 417 427 (2000) doi:10.1006/jabr.1999.8242, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on On Representability of a Finite Local Ring A. Z. Anan in Departamento de Matemática do IMECC, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brasil E-mail: ananin@ime.unicamp.br Communicated by Efim Zelmanov Received January 10, 1999 This article is devoted to the following problem: Let R be a finite local ring with identity. Can R be embedded into a matrix ring over a commutative ring? The question is reduced to an explicitly described class of test-cases. 2000 Academic Press Key Words: finite local ring; embedding into matrices. 1. INTRODUCTION This article is devoted to the following Problem 2 from [6, p. 401]: Let R be a finite local ring with identity. Can R be embedded into a matrix ring over a commutative ring? By a local (noncommutative) ring, we mean an associative ring with identity which has a unique maximal left ideal (it has to be two-sided). The question is deeply related to the articles of Bergman [2, 5], Bergman and Vovsi [3], and Bergman et al. [4], which led the author to the mistaken belief that it was raised by Bergman. The author sincerely thanks Bergman who kindly pointed out the reference [6] and the referee who made many improvements on the style of the article and suggested some simplification of the construction. First, an example of a finite local ring: Suppose we are given a prime integer p>0, an integer n>0, and integers i n i n 1 i k i 1 0. Let E = End B denote the ring of all automorphisms of the finite abelian p-group B= /p n /p n /p n 1 /p n 1 }{{}}{{} i n times i n 1 times 417 0021-8693/00 $35.00 Copyright 2000 by Academic Press All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

418 a. z. anan in /p k /p k /p /p }{{}}{{} i k times i 1 times = B 1 B 2 B α B r = C n C n 1 C k C 1 where B α = /p k α (with k α k β for α β), r = i n + i n 1 + + i k + +i 1, and C k = /p k /p k. As is well known, every element c E can be written in the form of a matrix, c = c αβ, where }{{} i k times c αβ Hom B β B α, and the multiplication (and addition) in E is defined using the usual rule for multiplication (and addition) of matrices and the composition (and addition) of homomorphisms. Let R = R p i1 i n E be the subset of all matrices of the form T nn T n1 a 1 + (1) T 1n T 11 where a and every block T kk End C k is lower triangular modulo p, 0 0 T kk mod p 0 I claim that R is a local ring (in fact, it is a maximal local subring in E containing the identity of E). Let N denote the ideal of matrices occurring on the right-hand side of (1). It is not hard to see from the definition that every member of N sends each B i into B i+1 + +B r +pb. Hence any member of N r sends B into pb and hence any member of N rn sends B into p n B = 0 ; son is nilpotent. Therefore, N is contained in N R (the nilpotent radical of R). Clearly, p 1 is also contained in N R. Thus, R/N R is at most /p. In some sense, the example presented is a general one. For an arbitrary finite local ring R with the nilpotent radical N R, the field R/N R can be lifted into R in the form of a local commutative subring A which can be described quite explicitly (see the next section). I have not succeeded in answering the question. The main result is the Theorem 1. Let R be a finite local ring. Then there is an embedding R Matr m R preserving identity such that R = A R p i1 i n, where A is a commutative finite local ring satisfying p n A = 0. Thus, the question is reduced to the one concerning the concrete finite local ring R p i1 i n. It seems likely to me is that it will not in general be

representability of a finite local ring 419 representable by matrices over a commutative ring. However, even if it is representable, the representation should be a little bit sophisticated: The ring R p 1 0 0 1 is representable and the minimal possible size of matrices is p. Such a representation is pointed out at the very end of the article. 2. SOME ELEMENTARY REMARKS Let R be a finite local ring with identity. Denote by N R the nilpotent radical (= maximal ideal) of R. As is known F = R/N R is a finite field of p m elements, where p is a prime integer. Clearly, p = p 1 N R and p n = 0inR. We take the least possible n to satisfy the last equality. The multiplicative group of F is cyclic. It is generated by y = y + N R. Therefore, y pm 1 = 1 + a, for some a N R. Since 1 + a pn = 1 for N 0, we obtain y pm 1 p N = 1. Since p N and p m 1 are coprime, we can replace y by y pn. For this new y, we have y pm 1 = 1. Denote by A the subring (with identity) generated by y. Obviously, A + N R =R. Hence, A is a commutative local ring with identity. Moreover, A/N A F. Note that the minimal polynomial for y over the prime field F p /p has the form t m f 0 t, deg f 0 <m. We can regard f 0 t as a polynomial over the integers. The commutative F p -algebra A/pA is generated by y which satisfies the equality y pm = y; therefore, A/pA satisfies the identity: z pm = z, z A/pA. In particular, A/pA is semisimple, which means that pa N A and, hence, N A =pa. Thus, we obtain y m = f 0 y +pg 1 y where g 1 t is a suitable polynomial over the integers. By use of this equality, we can replace every term of the form y m+i in g 1 y by f 0 y y i + pg 1 y y i on the right-hand side of the equality. After few such replacements, we shall acquire the equality y m = f 0 y +pf 1 y +p 2 g 2 y, where f 1 g 2 t and deg f 1 <m. After applying the same procedure to the terms in g 2 y, then to those in g 3 y, and so on, we shall obtain the equality y m = f 0 y +pf 1 y + +p n 1 f n 1 y where f i t, deg f i <m,0 i<n. Denote f t =f 0 t +pf 1 t + + p n 1 f n 1 t. We can regard f t as a polynomial over /p n, deg f<m. We will show that A /p n t / Ideal ( t m f t ) 2a Indeed, if g t is a nonzero polynomial over /p n, deg g<m, such that g y =0, then, multiplying g t by a suitable power p i, we have p i g t =

420 a. z. anan in p n 1 h t for a polynomial h t t, deg h<m, which is nonzero modulo p. Since the image of h y under the natural map A F is nonzero, h y is invertible in A. Thus, the equalities 0 = p i g y =p n 1 h y imply p n 1 = 0, contradiction. Arguing similarly, for an arbitrary 0 a A, we obtain a = p i q y, 0 i<n, deg q<m, and q t is nonzero modulo p. This means that q y is invertible. Consequently, every ideal in A has the form p i A. From this fact, we can deduce self-injectivity of A by use of the Baer criterion: If p i A A is an A-module homomorphism from an arbitrary ideal into A, 0 i n, then the image of p i has the form p k u, k i, with u A invertible. Therefore, the homomorphism is induced by multiplication by p i k u. The same arguments lead to self-injectivity of A/p k A, k>0. The homomorphism A F A/N A induces a homomorphism α Aut A Aut F of groups. I claim that it is an isomorphism. Indeed, if ϑ belongs to the kernel of α, then ϑ y y + pa, a A. Since y is nonzero in F, y is invertible in A, so we can write y + pa = y 1 + pb for a suitable b A. It follows that ϑ y pm 1 y pm 1 1 + pb pm 1 ; therefore, 1 = 1 + pb pm 1. On the other hand, 1 + pb pn = 1 for N 0. This means that 1 + pb = 1 and ϑ y y. Hence, α is an embedding. The group Aut F is generated by the Frobenius automorphism φ. It remains to show that there exists an automorphism of A which maps y to y p. Consider the group ring of the cyclic group G of order p m 1 over the ring /p n, i.e., B = /p n G /p n t / Ideal t pm 1 1. There exists an epimorphism B A which maps t to y. The well-known decomposition of a finite commutative ring into a direct sum of local rings, B = B 1 B r, for some i, yields an epimorphism B i A induced by the epimorphism B A. (Otherwise the local ring A would contain a nontrivial idempotent.) The epimorphism B i A induces an epimorphism B i /N B i A/N A of fields, which must be an isomorphism. Since p n 1 B i 0 by using the arguments which led to (2), we have B i /p n t / Ideal ( t m g t ), deg g<m, and card B i = card A; therefore, B i A is an isomorphism. The automorphism of G mapping x to x p induces an automorphism ψ of B. Every automorphism of B is formed by automorphisms of B i s and a permutation of B i s. We can find the permutation which corresponds to ψ by looking at ψ modulo p. Since B/pB F p G is a semisimple algebra and the induced automorphism is given by the rule x x p, we see that the permutation is trivial. This yields the automorphism of B i and, therefore, the desired automorphism of A. Denote this automorphism of A by ϕ. Let T = F F. For every i = 0 1 m 1, we define the ring homomorphisms h i T F onto F by the rule h i α β φ i α β. ( These homomorphisms have the kernels pairwise different, since h j α 1 1 φ i α ) = φ j α φ i α for all α F. Being semisimple (in view of the identity z pm = z), T is the direct sum of fields T = T 0 T m 1

representability of a finite local ring 421 with the isomorphisms T i F induced by h i s. Comparing cardinalities, we conclude that T = T 0 T m 1. Since the T -module F given by h i and the T -module T i are isomorphic, we obtain α 1 t i = ( 1 φ i α ) t i for all α F and t i T i. The ring B = A A has a decomposition into the direct sum of local rings B = B 0 B m 1. Modulo the radical N B =pb this decomposition induces the decomposition of T. Therefore, for every b i B i, we have ( y 1 1 ϕ i y ) b i pb B i = pb i. Thus, u n B i = 0, where u = x z pi, x = y 1, and z = 1 y. The equalities z pi pm = z pi and x pm = x imply x u = x u pm = x + p m uv + u 2 w for suitable v w B. Hence u 1 + p m v + uw =0. Since u n B i = 0, the element p m v + uw is nilpotent modulo the annihilator of B i in B. Therefore, ub i = 0. Thus, for every b i B i, the subring a A a 1 b i = ( 1 ϕ i a ) b i contains y. In other words, a 1 b i = ( 1 ϕ i a ) b i for all aıa and b i B i. Let M be an arbitrary A A -bimodule. Regarding M as a left B-module, we obtain the bimodule decomposition M = M 0 M m 1, where M i = B i M. It is clear that am i = m i ϕ i a for all a A and m i M i Summarizing, we arrive at the Proposition 2. Let R be a finite local ring with residue field F = R/N R of cardinality p m, where p is prime. Then there exists a y R such that y pm 1 = 1. The subring A generated by y satisfies the following properties: A is a commutative finite local ring and the ring A/p k A is selfinjective for every k 0; R = A + N R and N A =A N R =pa; the group Aut A is naturally isomorphic to the cyclic group Aut F with the automorphism ϕ y y p corresponding to the Frobenius automorphism φ; every A A -bimodule M admits an A A -bimodule decomposition M = M 0 M m 1 such that am i = m i ϕ i a for all a A and m i M i. 3. THE CONSTRUCTION The idea of this and the next sections is to put A into the center of some finite local ring R and represent the initial finite local ring R by matrices over R. The construction presented here is composed with the following picture in mind: The subring A of R is living in Matr m R in a twisted form on the diagonal R A a diag ( ϕ 0 a ϕ m 1 a ) Matr m R Let R and A be as in the preceding section. Applying the proposition to the A A -bimodules N = N R and R, we obtain two decompositions

422 a. z. anan in N = N 0 N m 1 and R = R 0 R m 1. Since A + N = R and A R 0, we see that R 0 = A + N 0 and R i = N i for 0 <i<m. It is easy to see that R = R 0 R m 1 is graded by the group Aut A = Aut F. In particular, R 0 is a subring. Note that p n 1 r = 0 implies r N; otherwise, r would be invertible and p n 1 = 0. On the other hand, if p n 1 r 0, then the ideal a A ar = 0 A does not contain p n 1 and, hence, equals zero, which means that the left A-module Ar is isomorphic to A. By using the self-injectivity of A, we can split R 0 into a direct sum of left A-modules, R 0 = A B 0.Ifp n 1 B 0 0, then we can similarly split B 0 : There exists r 1 B 0 such that p n 1 r 1 0; therefore, B 0 = Ar 1 B 1 and R 0 = A Ar 1 B 1. Finally, we obtain R 0 = A Ar 1 Ar t B t with p n 1 B t = 0. The last equality implies the inclusion B t N. For every r i, there are two possibilities: either r i N or N r i A + N = R. Inthe second case r i = a + b, where a A \ N and b N. Since A is local, we can replace such an r i by a 1 r i = 1 + c, where c = a 1 b N. Note that A A 1 + c =A Ac. Thus, we can suppose that all r i s belong to N. Summarizing, we obtain the decompositions of A A -bimodules R = A R 0 R 1 R m 1 R 0 = A R 0 R i N 2b where, for 0 <i<m, we denote R i = R i. (Observe that R 0 is an A A subbimodule, since it is a left A-submodule and A is in the center of R 0.) We will view all indices modulo m. Denote by R A r r i R R i r r i the respective projections, so that, for every r R, r = r + r 0 + +r m 1. Let C be a cyclic group of order m on one generator c, let S be the skew group ring on C over A defined by the relations ca = ϕ a c, a A, and let P = S A R be the coproduct ( free product ) of S and R with amalgamation of the common subring A. By [1, Corollary 8.1], the A A -bimodule decomposition (2) of R and the A A -bimodule decomposition S = A Ac Ac 2 Ac m 1 imply the following structure of P: The ring P is the direct sum of S and the A A -bimodules c i 0 R j0 R j1 c i k R jk where k 0, 0 <i l <mfor l = 1 2 k, 0 i 0 i k+1 <m, and 0 j l <mfor l = 0 1 k. The above summand has the structure of additive group R j0 A A R jk with the lth A twisting the action of elements of A by ϕ i l (i.e., r jl 1 ar jl = r jl 1 ϕ i l a rjl for a A, r jl 1 R jl 1, and r jl R jl ), and the A-bimodule structure of the whole tensor product likewise twisted via ϕ i 0 on the left and via ϕ i k+1 on the right. The multiplication in P is given by the rules r j c i c i r j = r j c i+i r j if i + i 0 3

representability of a finite local ring 423 r j c i c i r j = r j r j if i + i = 0 and j + j 0 r j c i c i r j = r j r j 0 + ( r j r j ) if i + i = 0 and j + j = 0 where the product ( r j r j ) can be calculated with the same rules by induction. It is easy to verify that the ring P is /m -graded: the degree of the term (3) is j 0 + +j k i 0 i k+1, so that ax i = x i ϕ i a for every a A and every x i P homogeneous of degree i. In particular, R is a /m -graded subring of P. Denote by Q the centralizer of A in P. As is easy to see c i R i j c j Q (in fact Q is generated by all the c i R i j c j s and A). There is a standard embedding of a /m -graded ring into the m m- matrices over it, ψ P Matr m P x x i j ij where x i stands for the homogeneous component of x of degree i. Let T = diag c 0 c m 1. It follows from the rule ax i = x i ϕ i a that the embedding P Matr m P, x Tψ x T 1, maps P into Matr m Q. Consequently, we obtain the embedding R Matr m Q r c i r i j c j + δ ij ϕ i r ij where δ ij is the Kronecker delta. Obviously, A is in the center of Q. 4. THE EMBEDDING Denote by I the ideal of P( generated by all R i. Here we will prove that, for M large enough, I M A + c i R i j c )= j 0, which thus yields the i j embedding R Matr m R, where R = Q/ I M Q is a finite local ring such that the subring à constructed from this ring R as A was constructed from R lies in the center of R. For some q>0, N q+1 = 0. We define R l i pa + R i for l 1by induction on l>0: For l = 1, put R 1 i = R i. For l>1, put R l i = α+β=i R l 1 α R 1 β. Clearly, R l i is an A A -subbimodule, R l 1 i 1 R l 2 i 2 R l 1+l 2 i 1 +i 2, and R l i N l. In particular, R l i = 0 for l>q. Now R l i R i if i 0. For i = 0, let r R l 0. We know that r = r + r 0 with r 0 R 0 N, r r 0 N, and r A; therefore r A N pa and thus R l 0 pa + R 0.

424 a. z. anan in It is clear that I M is the sum of c i 0 R l 1 j 0 R l 2 j 1 c i k R l k j k 4 where k 1, i 1 i k 0, q l 1 l k 1, and l 1 + +l k M (in particular, k M/q). We will reduce (4) to the canonical form (3) eliminating the factors R l t j t by using the inclusion R l t j t pa + R jt, c i 0 R l 1 j 0 R l 2 j 1 c i k R l k j k c i 0 pa + R j0 pa + R j1 c i2 c i k pa + R jk c i 0 R j0 R j1 c i k R jk + pi k 1 + p 2 I k 2 + +p n 1 I k n+1 c i 0 R j0 R j1 c i k R jk + pi k n c i 0 R j0 R j1 c i k R jk + pi M/q n since p n = 0. Note that the term c i 0 Rj0 Rj1 c i k Rjk is in the canonical form (3). Now we can apply the same procedure to I M/q n. Since p n = 0, for M large enough, we arrive finally at the canonical form (3) with k 2. This yields the fact needed. Proof of the Theorem ( the tensor division ). Now we can assume that R is an A-algebra and has a faithful finite (left) R-module M (for instance, M = R). Using induction on card M, we will show that R R p i1 i n End A M, where the ring R p i1 i n is similar to the ring R p i1 i n described in the introduction. The only difference between R p i1 i n and R p i1 i n is that, for the latter, the ring A is used in place of /p n. Let M = v M pv = 0. Since M is an R-submodule, we have the homomorphism R End A M/M. The image is a finite local A-algebra and we can apply the induction hypothesis to it. Thus, M/M has a basis b 1 b r over A such that M/M = r α=1 Ab α(as an A-module), every b α has additive order p k α,1 k α n (with k α k β if α β), and, for every c R, r cb α = a βα c b β 1 α r β=1 where a βα c A, all a αα c s have the same image in F = R/N R as c, and a βα c pa if β<αand k β =k α. Denote by b α M some preimage of b α. The sum S = r α=1 Ab α is direct: If r α=1 a α b α = 0, a α A, then a α b α = 0, hence a α = p k α d α for some d α A and every α. Now p r α=1 p k α 1 d α b α = 0, so

representability of a finite local ring 425 rα=1 p k α 1 d α b α M, which implies p k α 1 d α b α = 0 and d α = pf α, f α A. Since a α = p k α +1 f α and p k α +1 b α = 0, the fact follows. Moreover, we have proved that the additive order of b α is p k α +1. As an A-module, M is simply an F-vector space (recall that F = A/pA). Clearly, M = M S = r α=1 Ap k α b α and the p k α b α s form an F-basis for M. Note that M is an R-submodule: For c R, cb α = r a βα c b β + q α c β=1 where q α c M. Since k α 1, we obtain c p k α b α = r β=1 p k α a βα c b β S. Obviously, c p k α b α M. In other words, RM M. The R-module M is in fact an R/p R-module and R/p R in its turn is a local finite-dimensional F-algebra. As is known, there is an F-basis for M /M such that R/p R acts on M /M in a lower triangular way with respect to this basis. Denote by b r+1 b r+s some preimage of this basis. Now, for c R and 1 α r, we can write q α c as q α c = r g βα c p k β b β + β=1 r+s γ=r+1 where g βα c a γα c A. Forr<ϑ r + s, we have cb ϑ = r a βϑ c pk β b β + β=1 r+s γ=r+1 a γα c b γ a γϑ c b γ where a βϑ c a γϑ c A, a γϑ c =0 for r<γ<ϑ r + s, and all a ϑϑ c s have the same image in F = R/N R as c. For 1 α β r<ϑ r + s, denote a βα c =a βα c +p k β g βα c and a βϑ = a βϑ c pk β. For 1 π r + s, denote by p k π the additive order of b π. (Thus, for 1 π r, we obtain k π =k π +1.) It is straightforward that k π k δ if π δ. Summarizing, we obtain: For all c R and 1 π r + s r+s cb π = a δπ c b δ δ=1 where a δπ c A, all a ππ c s have the same image in F = R/N R as c, and a δπ c pa if δ<πand k δ =k π. The rest is clear: R R p i1 i n, M = A B (the finite abelian p-group defined in the introduction), and R p i1 i n = A R p i1 i n.

426 a. z. anan in 5. REPRESENTABILITY OF R p 1 0 0 1 Note that the ring R p 1 0 0 1, n > 1, is generated by 1, e n1 Hom /p /p n induced by,1 p n 1, and e 1n Hom /p n /p induced by, 1 1, which satisfy the relations p n = 0 pe n1 = 0 pe 1n = 0 e 2 n1 = 0 e2 1n = 0 e 1ne n1 = 0 e n1 e 1n = p n 1 Conversely, if a ring R is generated by e n1, e 1n, and 1 which satisfy the above presented relations and p n 1 0, then R is isomorphic to R p 1 0 0 1 : Every element x R can be written as a + be n1 + ce 1n with a /p n and b c /p. Ifx = 0, then 0 = px = pa and a = p n 1 a, a. Therefore, 0 = xe 1n = bp n 1 and 0 = e n1 x = cp n 1, which implies b = c = 0 and, hence, a = 0. Thus, R has p n+2 elements like R p 1 0 0 1. Suppose that R is a subring of Matr m D (with the same identity), where D is a commutative ring with identity. Then 0 = tr e 1n e n1 =tr e n1 e 1n =mp n 1 and m is divisible by p. Denote by D 0 the commutative /p -algebra (without identity) with the basis b 1 b 2 b p 1 b b z and the multiplication given by the rule b b = z b 2 i = z i = 1 2 p 1 (all the others elements in the basis have zero product). Clearly, D 3 0 = 0 and D 0 is associative. Consider D 0 as a /p n -algebra and adjoin a formal identity to it. Then identify the elements p n 1 and z in the algebra D 1 = /p n 1 + D 0 to obtain ( D = /p n 1 + /p b 1 + + /p b p 1 )/ + /p b + /p b + /p z Ideal z p n 1 Since Ideal z p n 1 = /p z p n 1, we conclude that p n 1 0 in D. In the ring D, we have b 2 1 = pn 1, b 2 2 = pn 1,, b 2 p 1 = pn 1, b b = p n 1, and b 2 1 + b2 2 + +b2 p 1 + b b = pp n 1 = 0; therefore, the matrices 0 0 b 1 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 2 e n1 = and e 1n = 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 p 1 0 0 b b 1 b 2 b p 1 b satisfy the above relations. At the moment I do not know whether the ring R 2 0 1 1 (of 256 elements) is representable.

representability of a finite local ring 427 REFERENCES 1. G. M. Bergman, The diamond lemma for ring theory, Adv. Math. 29, No. 2 (1978), 178 218. 2. G. M. Bergman, Embedding rings in completed graded rings: 1. Triangular embeddings, J. Algebra 84 (1983), 14 24. 3. G. M. Bergman and S. M. Vovsi, Embedding rings in completed graded rings: 2. Algebras over a field, J. Algebra 84 (1983), 25 41. 4. G. M. Bergman, D. J. Britten, and F. W. Lemire, Embedding rings in completed graded rings: 3. Algebras over general k, J. Algebra 84 (1983), 42 61. 5. G. M. Bergman, Embedding rings in completed graded rings: 4. Commutative algebras, J. Algebra 84 (1983), 62 106. 6. Yu.I.Mal tsev, On the representation of finite rings by matrices over commutative rings, Math. USSR Sb. 56, No. 2 (1987), 379 402.