Towards a physical understanding of the m b :M s Event Screening Criterion

Similar documents
Detecting and Identifying Seismic Events Using the Egyptian National Seismic Network

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

28th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Latitude (North) Longitude (East) Latitude (North) Longitude (East)

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

SEISMIC LOCATION CALIBRATION FOR 30 INTERNATIONAL MONITORING SYSTEM STATIONS IN EASTERN ASIA. Sponsored by Defense Threat Reduction Agency

SEISMIC CALIBRATION OF GROUP ONE INTERNATIONAL MONITORING SYSTEM STATIONS IN EASTERN ASIA FOR IMPROVED EVENT LOCATION

Dealing with Hard-to-Identify Seismic Events Globally and Those near Nuclear Test Sites

Underlying Reasons for the Wide Range of Yield Estimates for the Underground Nuclear Explosion of September 3, 2017, in North Korea

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

STUDY OF BROADBAND Lg/P AND ITS APPLICATION TO SOURCE DISCRIMINATION

SOURCE AND PROPAGATION CHARACTERISTICS OF EXPLOSIVE AND OTHER SEISMIC SOURCES

Seismology BY LYNN R. SYKES AND PAUL G. RICHARDS

Bradley B. Woods and Chandan K. Saikia Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, Pasadena, CA. F C-0046 Sponsored by AFOSR ABSTRACT

in Seismic Monitoring

24th Seismic Research Review Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Innovation and Integration

DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMATED MOMENT TENSOR SOFTWARE AT THE PROTOTYPE INTERNATIONAL DATA CENTER

High-precision location of North Korea s 2009 nuclear test

24th Seismic Research Review Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Innovation and Integration

24th Seismic Research Review Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Innovation and Integration

A Scaling Analysis of Frequency Dependent Energy Partition for Local and Regional Phases from Explosions

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Analysis of the 29th May 2008 Ölfus earthquake and aftershock sequence using three-component t processing on ICEARRAY

Regional Seismic Characteristics of the 9 October 2006 North Korean Nuclear Test

DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMATED MOMENT TENSOR SOFTWARE AT THE PROTOTYPE INTERNATIONAL DATA CENTER

IDENTIFICATION OF ROCKBURSTS AND OTHER MINING EVENTS USING REGIONAL SIGNALS AT INTERNATIONAL MONITORING SYSTEM STATIONS

28th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

28th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

CEPSTRAL F-STATISIC PERFORMANCE AT REGIONAL DISTANCES. Sponsored by Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Contract No. DSWA01-98-C-0142

Mid-Period Rayleigh Wave Attenuation Model for Asia

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

A NEW REGIONAL 3-D VELOCITY MODEL OF THE INDIA-PAKISTAN REGION. Weston Geophysical Corporation 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2

26th Seismic Research Review - Trends in Nuclear Explosion Monitoring

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Application of Phase Matched Filtering on Surface Waves for Regional Moment Tensor Analysis Andrea Chiang a and G. Eli Baker b

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp, , August 1979 TIME FUNCTIONS APPROPRIATE FOR NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS

CTBT Monitoring Capability

24th Seismic Research Review Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Innovation and Integration

RESEARCH IN REGIONAL SEISMIC MONITORING. Sponsored by the Department of Defense. Contract No. F C-0001

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Constraints on earthquake epicentres independent of seismic velocity models

PHASE TIME INVERSION: A SIMPLE METHOD FOR REGIONAL WAVEFORM INVERSION. Charles A. Langston. University of Memphis

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

28th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies IMPROVED EVENT LOCATION UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATES

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Regional Seismic Travel Time (RSTT) Modeling Technique. Science & Technology Conference, June Presented By Stephen C. Myers

Rapid Source Estimation from Global Calibrated Paths

EXCITATION AND ATTENUATION OF REGIONAL WAVES, AND MAGNITUDE DEPENDENCE OF PN/LG RATIOS IN EASTERN EURASIA

28th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

APPLICATION OF RECEIVER FUNCTION TECHNIQUE TO WESTERN TURKEY

ON NEAR-FIELD GROUND MOTIONS OF NORMAL AND REVERSE FAULTS FROM VIEWPOINT OF DYNAMIC RUPTURE MODEL

INTEGRATING DIVERSE CALIBRATION PRODUCTS TO IMPROVE SEISMIC LOCATION

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964, USA

25th Seismic Research Review - Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Building the Knowledge Base

Semiannual Technical Summary

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies MODELING P WAVE MULTIPATHING IN SOUTHEAST ASIA

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies IMPROVED DEPTH-PHASE DETECTION AT REGIONAL DISTANCES

Seismological Evidence for a Low-Yield Nuclear Test on 12 May 2010 in North Korea

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Steven R. Taylor, EES-3 Hans E. Hartse, EES-3 DOE DELIVERABLE

Contract F C-0093 Sponsored by ARPA ABSTRACT

Kursk Explosion. by Brian Savage and Don V. Helmberger. Introduction. Underwater Explosive Sources

RELOCATION OF THE MACHAZE AND LACERDA EARTHQUAKES IN MOZAMBIQUE AND THE RUPTURE PROCESS OF THE 2006 Mw7.0 MACHAZE EARTHQUAKE

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 115, B11309, doi: /2010jb007707, 2010

Identifying Isotropic Events Using an Improved Regional Moment Tensor Inversion Technique

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

APPLICATION OF A GLOBAL 3D MODEL TO IMPROVE REGIONAL EVENT LOCATIONS

Reference Events for Regional Seismic Phases at IMS Stations in China

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

BROADBAND SEISMIC STUDIES IN SOUTHERN ASIA. Sponsored by Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Contract No. DTRA01-00-C-0028

FOCAL MECHANISM DETERMINATION USING WAVEFORM DATA FROM A BROADBAND STATION IN THE PHILIPPINES

Preparation of a Comprehensive Earthquake Catalog for Northeast India and its completeness analysis

CAP M S Wallace. Vol. 27 No. 2 Jun EARTHQUAKE RESEARCH IN CHINA M S 4. 8 CAP. 3km - - P315

RESEARCH IN REGIONAL SEISMIC MONITORING. Sponsored by Air Force Technical Applications Center. Contract No. F C-0055

VALIDATION AND GENERATION OF REFERENCE EVENTS BY CLUSTER ANALYSIS. E. R. Engdahl and Eric A. Bergman. University of Colorado, Boulder

Semiannual Technical Summary

Properties of three seismic events in September in the northern Korean Peninsula from moment tensor

SEISMIC CALIBRATION OF THE EUROPEAN ARCTIC

EVALUATION OF CROSS-CORRELATION METHODS ON A MASSIVE SCALE FOR ACCURATE RELOCATION OF SEISMIC EVENTS

SEISMIC EVENT LOCATION STRATEGY AND PATH CALIBRATION IN AND AROUND THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT. Chandan K. Saikia and Gene Ichinose. URS Group, Inc.

The political subdivision of Southeast Asia and Northwest Africa in the Flinn-Engdahl Regionalization Scheme

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Teleseismic receiver function using stacking and smoothing of multi seismic-records at a single station

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

SOURCE SPECIFIC STATION CORRECTIONS (SSSCS) FOR INTERNATIONAL MONITORING SYSTEM (IMS) SEISMIC STATIONS IN NORTH AFRICA, MIDDLE EAST AND WESTERN ASIA

A PLAN FOR LOCATION CALIBRATION OF IMS STATIONS IN AND NEAR KAZAKHSTAN

Rupture Dynamics of Large Earthquakes inferred from Hydroacoustic Data

The use of waveform cross correlation to recover the aftershock sequence of the August 14, 2016 earthquake within Sakhalin Island

Near field travel-time solutions for Anatolia

26th Seismic Research Review - Trends in Nuclear Explosion Monitoring

24th Seismic Research Review Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Innovation and Integration

Egyptian National Seismological Network (ENSN) and its Roles for Monitoring the Seismic Activity

ANEWJOINTP AND S VELOCITY MODEL OF THE MANTLE PARAMETERIZED IN CUBIC B-SPLINES

Transcription:

Towards a physical understanding of the m b :M s Event Screening Criterion Neil D. Selby UK NDC 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page 1

Introduction Event Screening is the rejection of H0 at a given significance level, where the null hypothesis, H 0, is that seismic (hydroacoustic, infrasound) signals are from a single explosion source. mb :Ms is one of the four experimental provisional event screening criteria in use at the International Data Centre. mb :Ms is based on teleseismic body-wave magnitude m b and surface wave magnitude Ms. Improving our understanding of the physical basis of mb :Ms may enable us to enhance screening performance. 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page

Introduction Body-waves travel through the interior of the Earth, while surface waves are guided by the surface of the Earth. The basis of the mb :Ms criterion is that, in general, explosions generate smaller surface waves than earthquakes with the same body-wave magnitude. 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page

Body waves and surface waves 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page

The m b :M s plot Earthquakes: from IDC REB for 00. surface wave magnitude, M s REB Events 00 China 9081 China 9008 Pakistan 9808 India: mb from Bowers et al. 00; Ms from Douglas et al 00. Pakistan: mb and Ms from Bowers et al. 00. China: mb from pidc REB; Ms from Bonner et al. 00. China 909 India 98011 body wave magnitude, m b 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page

Original IDC Experimental Screening Line Screening line: Fisk et al 00. Earthquakes: from IDC REB for 00. surface wave magnitude, M s REB Events 00 M s = 1.m b.0 Original IDC Experimental Screening Line China 9081 China 9008 Pakistan 9808 India: mb from Bowers et al. 00; Ms from Douglas et al 00. Pakistan: mb and Ms from Bowers et al. 00. China: mb from pidc REB; Ms from Bonner et al. 00. China 909 India 98011 body wave magnitude, m b 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page

DPRK 00 DPRK 00: UK NDC mb =.9, Ms =.8. (REB: m b =.1). surface wave magnitude, M s REB Events 00 M s = 1.m b.0 Original IDC Experimental Screening Line China 9081 China 9008 Pakistan 9808 Screening line: Fisk et al 00. Earthquakes: from IDC REB for 00. India: mb from Bowers et al. 00; Ms from Douglas et al 00. Pakistan: mb and Ms from Bowers et al. 00. China: mb from pidc REB; Ms from Bonner et al. 00. DPRK 01009 China 909 India 98011 body wave magnitude, m b 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page

DPRK 009 DPRK 009: UK NDC mb =., Ms =.. (REB: m b =., Ms =.). surface wave magnitude, M s DPRK 090 REB Events 00 M s = 1.m b.0 Original IDC Experimental Screening Line China 9081 China 9008 Pakistan 9808 DPRK 00: UK NDC mb =.9, Ms =.8. (REB: m b =.1). Screening line: Fisk et al 00. DPRK 01009 China 909 India 98011 body wave magnitude, m b 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page 8

01 Experimental Screening Line Screening line: Selby et al. 01. DPRK 009: UK NDC mb =., Ms =.. (REB: m b =., Ms =.). surface wave magnitude, M s DPRK 090 REB Events 00 M s = m b 0. IDC Experimental Screening Line China 9081 China 9008 Pakistan 9808 DPRK 00: UK NDC mb =.9, Ms =.8. (REB: m b =.1). DPRK 01009 China 909 India 98011 body wave magnitude, m b 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page 9

DPRK 01 DPRK 01: UK NDC mb =.0, Ms =.9. (REB: m b =.9, Ms =.9). Screening line: Selby et al. 01. surface wave magnitude, M s REB Events 00 DPRK 101 DPRK 090 M s = m b 0. IDC Experimental Screening Line China 9081 China 9008 Pakistan 9808 DPRK 009: UK NDC mb =., Ms =.. (REB: m b =., Ms =.). DPRK 00: UK NDC mb =.9, Ms =.8. (REB: m b =.1). DPRK 01009 China 909 India 98011 body wave magnitude, m b 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page 10

NTS explosions Explosion magnitudes from Selby et al. (01). surface wave magnitude, M s REB Events 00 M s = 1.m b.0 Original IDC Experimental Screening Line NTS Explosions body wave magnitude, m b 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page 11

East Kazakhstan explosions Explosion magnitudes from Selby et al. (01). surface wave magnitude, M s REB Events 00 M s = 1.m b.0 Original IDC Experimental Screening Line East Kazakh Explosions NTS Explosions body wave magnitude, m b 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page 1

Novaya Zemlya explosions Explosion magnitudes from Selby et al. (01). surface wave magnitude, M s REB Events 00 M s = 1.m b.0 Original IDC Experimental Screening Line East Kazakh Novaya Zemlya NTS body wave magnitude, m b 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page 1

Lop Nor explosions Explosion magnitudes from Selby et al. (01). surface wave magnitude, M s REB Events 00 M s = 1.m b.0 Original IDC Experimental Screening Line East Kazakh Novaya Zemlya Lop Nor NTS body wave magnitude, m b 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page 1

FSU PNEs surface wave magnitude, M s REB Events 00 M s = 1.m b.0 Original IDC Experimental Screening Line East Kazakh PNEs Novaya Zemlya Lop Nor Peaceful Nuclear Explosions in the Former Soviet Union. Explosion magnitudes from Selby et al. (01). NTS body wave magnitude, m b 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page 1

All Explosion magnitudes from Selby et al. (01). surface wave magnitude, M s REB Events 00 DPRK 101 DPRK 090 M s = m b 0. IDC Experimental Screening Line East Kazakh PNEs Novaya Zemlya Lop Nor DPRK 01009 NTS body wave magnitude, m b 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page 1

Magnitude yield relationships m b m b = 0.log 10 Y + NTS FSU PNEs Kazakhstan Explosion magnitudes from Selby et al. (01). NTS yields from Springer et al. (00). Nominal magnitude yield relationships. 0 1 log 10 Y M s = log 10Y + M s 0 1 log 10 Y 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page 1

Magnitude yield relationships m b m b = 0.log 10 Y + NTS FSU PNEs Kazakhstan Explosion magnitudes from Selby et al. (01). NTS yields from Springer et al. (00). PNE yields from Sultanov et al. (1999). Nominal magnitude yield relationships. 0 1 log 10 Y M s = log 10Y + M s Both mb and Ms higher for PNEs than NTS explosions of same yield. 0 1 log 10 Y 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page 18

Magnitude yield relationships m b m b = 0.log 10 Y + 0 1 log 10 Y NTS FSU PNEs Kazakhstan Explosion magnitudes from Selby et al. (01). NTS yields from Springer et al. (00). PNE yields from Sultanov et al. (1999). Magnitude yield relationships: Mueller & Murphy (191) model suggests mb -yield and Ms-yield relationships should have the same slope. This does not seem to be the case for NTS. M s = log 10Y + M s 0 1 log 10 Y Both mb and Ms higher for PNEs than NTS explosions of same yield. For Kazakhstan, mb higher than NTS but Ms similar. Higher mb usually attributed to difference in t. 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page 19

Yield and depth...0.0 log 10 h. log 10 h..0.0 1. 0 1 log 10 Y 1. 0 1 log 10 Y NTS explosions (blue) mostly at scaled depth, FSU PNEs (red) deeper, with no obvious relationship between depth and yield. If m b and Ms scale differently with depth, could this, together with differences in t, explain the difference in m b - and Ms-yield relationships between NTS and the PNEs? 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page 0

Earthquake mb Ms regional variability. I I I I 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0.8 REB magnitudes 010 Nb 10, Ns 10. Depth, h = 0.0. mb Ms plotted at event epicentre. 1.0 mb Ms 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page 1

M s path effects Selby et al. 00. -0. 0.0 0. δγ 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page

Questions Is the variation in m b -yield between NTS, Kazakhstan and the PNEs due to t? If so, what is the correct value of t for DPRK? Are the differences in M s -yield between NTS/Kazakhstan and the FSU PNEs due to the depth of burial? Is the difference in the m b -yield and M s -yield relationships for NTS due to the scaled depth of burial? What is the appropriate depth / depth-scaling for DPRK? Can the variability of earthquake m b :M s values be reduced by cleverer measurements of m b and M s? 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page

References Bonner J.L., Russell D.R., Harkrider D.G., Reiter D.T., and Herrmann R.B., 00. Development of a time-domain, variable-period surface-wave magnitude measurement procedure for application at regional and teleseismic distances, part II: application and Ms-m b performance. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 9, 8 9. Bowers, D., Douglas, A., Selby, N.D., Marshall, P.D., Porter, D., and Wallis, N. J., 00. Seismological identification of the 1998 May 8 Pakistan nuclear test. Geophys. J. Int., 10, 1-11. Douglas A., Selby N.D., and Bowers D., 00. Seismic magnitude and yield for the Indian nuclear test of 11 May 1998. Current Science 8, 989-9. Fisk, M., D. Jepsen and J.R. Murphy, 00. Experimental seismic event-screening criteria at the Prototype International Data Centre, Pure Appl. Geophys., 19, 8-888. Selby, N.D., D. Bowers, P.D. Marshall and N.D. Selby, 00. Empirical path and station corrections for surface-wave magnitude, Ms, using a global network. Geophys. J. Int., 1, 9-90. Selby, N.D., P.D. Marshall, and D. Bowers, 01. mb :Ms event screening revisited. Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 10, 88-9. Springer, D.L., G.A. Pawloski, J.L. Ricca, R.F. Rohrer, and D.K. Smith, 00. Seismic source summary for all U.S. below-surface nuclear explosions. Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 9, 180-180. Sultanov, D. D., J.R. Murphy, and Kh. D. Rubinstein, 1999. A seismic source summary for Soviet peaceful nuclear explosions. Bull. seism. Soc. Amer., 89, 0-. 01 British Crown Owned Copyright/MOD Page