Background on c-projective geometry

Similar documents
Representation theory and the X-ray transform

Parabolic geometry in five dimensions

Conformally Fedosov Manifolds

Conformally invariant differential operators

Quaternionic Complexes

Representation theory and the X-ray transform

Conformal and CR Geometry from the Parabolic Viewpoint

Invariant differential operators on the sphere

H-projective structures and their applications

ALMOST COMPLEX PROJECTIVE STRUCTURES AND THEIR MORPHISMS

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

Modern Geometric Structures and Fields

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries

How to recognise the geodesics of a metric connection

How to recognize a conformally Kähler metric

From holonomy reductions of Cartan geometries to geometric compactifications

How to recognise a conformally Einstein metric?

Summary of Prof. Yau s lecture, Monday, April 2 [with additional references and remarks] (for people who missed the lecture)

OVERDETERMINED SYSTEMS, CONFORMAL DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, AND THE BGG COMPLEX

Subcomplexes in Curved BGG Sequences

As always, the story begins with Riemann surfaces or just (real) surfaces. (As we have already noted, these are nearly the same thing).

Projective parabolic geometries

Invariant calculus for parabolic geometries

The gap phenomenon in parabolic geometries

Symmetric Spaces. Andrew Fiori. Sept McGill University

ESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES. 1. Introduction

Classification problems in conformal geometry

Generalized complex geometry and topological sigma-models

Conformal geometry and twistor theory

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

Self-dual conformal gravity

Infinitesimal Einstein Deformations. Kähler Manifolds

William P. Thurston. The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds

Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky

An Invitation to Geometric Quantization

Two simple ideas from calculus applied to Riemannian geometry

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 16 Nov 2017

Observer dependent background geometries arxiv:

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

Symmetries of Parabolic Geometries

Some brief notes on the Kodaira Vanishing Theorem

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION Harvard University Department of Mathematics Tuesday January 20, 2015 (Day 1)

Holography of BGG-Solutions

Complex line bundles. Chapter Connections of line bundle. Consider a complex line bundle L M. For any integer k N, let

Math 550 / David Dumas / Fall Problems

Projective space and twistor theory

Parallel and Killing Spinors on Spin c Manifolds. 1 Introduction. Andrei Moroianu 1

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula

Section 2. Basic formulas and identities in Riemannian geometry

Holonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. Mathematics Colloquium School of Mathematics and Physics The University of Queensland. October 31, 2011 May 28, 2012

Some Elliptic and Subelliptic Complexes from Geometry

5 Constructions of connections

class # MATH 7711, AUTUMN 2017 M-W-F 3:00 p.m., BE 128 A DAY-BY-DAY LIST OF TOPICS

SOME ALMOST COMPLEX STRUCTURES WITH NORDEN METRIC ON THE TANGENT BUNDLE OF A SPACE FORM

A COMPLEX FROM LINEAR ELASTICITY. Michael Eastwood

Linear connections on Lie groups

Symplectic geometry of deformation spaces

The topology of symplectic four-manifolds

The X-ray transform on projective space

Some Research Themes of Aristide Sanini. 27 giugno 2008 Politecnico di Torino

C-PROJECTIVE COMPACTIFICATION; (QUASI )KÄHLER METRICS AND CR BOUNDARIES

Reduction of Homogeneous Riemannian structures

AFFINE SPHERES AND KÄHLER-EINSTEIN METRICS. metric makes sense under projective coordinate changes. See e.g. [10]. Form a cone (1) C = s>0

WEYL STRUCTURES FOR PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES

Transparent connections

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

Holomorphic line bundles

Torus actions and Ricci-flat metrics

η = (e 1 (e 2 φ)) # = e 3

First structure equation

Holonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. School of Mathematical Sciences Colloquium University of Adelaide, May 7, /15

Geometric Structures in Mathematical Physics Non-existence of almost complex structures on quaternion-kähler manifolds of positive type

Riemannian geometry of the twistor space of a symplectic manifold

Contact pairs (bicontact manifolds)

Integration of non linear conservation laws?

Conformal field theory in the sense of Segal, modified for a supersymmetric context

Twistor constructions of quaternionic manifolds and asymptotically hyperbolic Einstein Weyl spaces. Aleksandra Borówka. University of Bath

Notes on torsion. Arkadiusz Jadczyk. October 11, 2010

INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD

Flat complex connections with torsion of type (1, 1)

Minimal surfaces in quaternionic symmetric spaces

Global aspects of Lorentzian manifolds with special holonomy

Metrisability of Painleve equations and Hamiltonian systems of hydrodynamic type

1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties

CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES

The X-ray transform: part II

The parallelism of shape operator related to the generalized Tanaka-Webster connection on real hypersurfaces in complex two-plane Grassmannians

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY AND THE QUATERNIONS. Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) The Chern Lectures Berkeley April 9th-18th 2013

Spin(10,1)-metrics with a parallel null spinor and maximal holonomy

12 Geometric quantization

Hard Lefschetz Theorem for Vaisman manifolds

Eta Invariant and Conformal Cobordism

INTRO TO SUBRIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

Atiyah classes and homotopy algebras

Geometry of symmetric R-spaces

Some new torsional local models for heterotic strings

Conification of Kähler and hyper-kähler manifolds and supergr

Space of surjective morphisms between projective varieties

The Erwin Schrödinger International Boltzmanngasse 9 Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Wien, Austria

Twistors and Conformal Higher-Spin. Theory. Tristan Mc Loughlin Trinity College Dublin

Transcription:

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 1/26 Background on c-projective geometry Michael Eastwood [ following the work of others ] Australian National University

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 2/26 Classical question Given a Riemannian metric, is there another with the same geodesics as unparameterised curves? EG (Thales circa 6 BC) the round sphere (1+y 2 )dx 2 xy dxdy+(1+x 2 )dy 2 (1+x 2 + y 2 ) 2

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 3/26 Better (classical) question Given a projective structure, is there a metric connection in the projective class and, if so, how many? Geometric Def n Two torsion-free affine connections α and ˆ α are projectively equivalent iff they have the same geodesics as unparameterised curves Operational Def n Two torsion-free affine connections α and ˆ α are projectively equivalent iff ˆ α φ β = α φ β Υ α φ β Υ β φ α for some 1-form Υ α better derivation

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 4/26 Tensors on oriented smooth manifolds Frame bundle principal GL + (n,r)-bundle Tangent bundle GL + (n,r) acting on R n (defining rep n ) Cotangent bundle GL + (n,r) acting on(r n ) Symmetric covariant tensors GL + (n,r) acting on 2 (R n ) Embed GL + (n,r) SL(n+1,R) λ 1 B λ B λ> * * * gl(n,r) (trace-free) raising lowering Cartan * *

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 5/26 The (co-)tangent bundle gl(n,r) lowest weight vector 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = = 1 1 2 1 1 = 1 1 1 1 = minus lowest weight 1 1 1 dual bundle Λ 1 2 1 =

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 6/26 The de Rham complex In three dimensions (grad, curl, div) R Λ d Λ 1 d Λ 2 d Λ 3 Use our new notation! R 2 1 3 1 4 Already redolent of projective differential geometry! Cf. de Rham complex in four conformal dimensions 2 3 R 1 2 1 3 2 1 4 1 4

Easy algorithms! Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 7/26

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 8/26 Real projective geometry Change of connection (contorsion) ˆ α φ β = α φ β Γ αβ γ φ γ for Γ αβ γ Λ 1 Λ 1 T change of torsion τ γ αβ = 2Γ γ [αβ] Λ 2 T Λ 1 Λ 1 T Λ 2 T coker = ker = 2 Λ 1 4 2 T = 1 1 3 2 = 1 2 1 ˆ α φ β = α φ β Υ α φ β Υ β φ α Projective differential geometry from thin air!

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 9/26 The flat model G/P or (better) RP n = SL(n+1,R)/ S n = SL(n+1,R)/ λ for λ> a b c d e Irreducible homogeneous vector bundles

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 1/26 PILDOs Examples Metrisability 2 2 1 2 2 T( 2) σ βγ ( α σ βγ ) Projective Killing Killing tensors!! 1 1 (2) 3 2 1 X γ ( (α β) X γ + P αβ X γ + W γ δ(α β) X δ ) d 2 d+1 d Λ 1 (2d) X βγ δ (α X βγ δ) All PILDOs BGG a b c (a+1) a 2 a+b+1 c (b+1) a a b 3 b+c+1 (c+1) a a b c 4 b

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 11/26 Holomorphic projective geometry Repeat previous discussion in the holomorphic category! ˆ a φ b = a φ b Υ a φ b Υ b φ a for some holomorphic 1-form Υ a Crucial difference!! An (n + 1)-fold covering Do not be afraid: cf. spinors GL(n,C) / SL(n+1,C) λ 1 B λ B Upshot: insist on an(n+1) st root of the canonical bundle. Ω n =O( n 1) as on CP n (the flat model)

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 12/26 Tensors on almost complex manifolds Reduced structure group GL(n,C) GL(2n,R) by GL(n,C) {M GL(2n,R) s.t. MJ=JM}, where, for example, J is the 2n 2n matrix Complexify ( 1 1 ). GL(n,C) GL(n,C) GL(n,C) C GL(2n,C) C 2n CT= T 1, T,1 ={v s.t. Jv= iv} {v s.t. Jv= iv}.

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 13/26 Covering subgroup of SL(n+1,C) λ B Homomorphism GL(n,C) given by λ B λ 1 B. Recall: it is an(n+1)-fold covering.

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 14/26 Representations GL(n,C) C GL(n,C) GL(n,C) Lie algebra (case n=5), and decorate p a b c d q e f g h and optionally insist that p+2a+3b+4c+5d q+ 2e+3f+ 4g+ 5h mod 6. External tensor product p a b c d q e f g h but keeps track of real structure.

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 15/26 Conjugate bundles Conjugate of p a b c d q e f g h is q e f g h p a b c d Prototype 1 1 CT= T 1, T,1 = 1 1 Dual Λ 1 = Λ,1 Λ 1, = 2 1 2 1

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 16/26 2-tensors and 3-forms Λ 2 = Λ 1,1 (Λ 2, Λ,2 ) 2 1 Λ 2 = 2 1 3 1 ( Cc) 2 1 2 Λ 1 = 2 1 4 2 ( Cc) Λ 3 =(Λ 2,1 Λ 1,2 ) (Λ 2, Λ,2 ) 3 1 Λ 3 =( 2 1 4 1 Cc) ( Cc)

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 17/26 The de Rham complex Remark in advance: c-projective geometry is 1 -graded (integrable case) Λ, Λ 1, Λ 2, Λ,1 Λ 1,1 Λ,2 2 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 1

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 18/26 Torsion Λ 2 T decomposes into five R-irreducibles 2 1 2 ( 1 1 1 ( 2 1 Cc) Cc) 2 1 1 ( Cc) 3 1 ( 1 1 Cc)

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 19/26 Complex connections Λ 1 gl(n,c) decomposes into six R-irreducibles 2 1 3 ( 1 1 1 ( 2 1 Cc) Cc) 2 1 1 ( Cc) 3 2 1 ( Cc)

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 2/26 Compare! 2 1 ( 3 2 1 Cc) ( Λ 1 gl(n,c) Λ 2 TM Cc) 3 1 ( 1 1 Cc), where Γ αβ γ 2Γ [αβ] γ. 3 1 ( 1 1 Cc) the Nijenhuis tensor

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 21/26 C-projective geometry (from thin air) 2 1 ( 3 2 1 Cc) ( Λ 1 gl(n,c) Λ 2 TM Cc) 3 1 ( 1 1 Cc), where Γ αβ γ 2Γ [αβ] γ. 2 1 ( Cc) C-projective freedom

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 22/26 C-projective freedom In real money ˆ α φ β = α φ β 1 2 (Υ αφ β +Υ β φ α J α γ Υ γ J β δ φ δ J β γ Υ γ J α δ φ δ ) In complex money (barred and unbarred indices) ˆ a φ b = a φ b Υ a φ b Υ b φ a ˆ āφ b = āφb ( Λ 1, Λ,1 Λ 1, ) ˆ āφ b= āφ b Υāφ b Υ bφā ˆ a φ b= a φ b

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 23/26 Deformation complex 1 1 ( 3 2 1 Cc) ( 4 1 1 1 Cc) ( Cc) 1 1 ( 2 1 Cc) 3 2 1 ( 2 1 Cc) 1 1 ( 3 1 Cc) vector fields infinitesimal deformations harmonic curvature

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 24/26 C-metrisability complex 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 or 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 ( 1 3 1 1 Cc) ( 1 Cc) 2 1 1 2 1 1

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 25/26 Parabolic viewpoint Curvature Tractors Prolongation Kähler metrics Kähler-Einstein metrics Hamiltonian two-forms... and more besides...

Second Kioloa Workshop on C-projective Geometry p. 26/26 THE END THANK YOU