GCAA ADVISORY CIRCULAR

Similar documents
Meteorology SNOWTAM decoding Guide Made by: Sebastian Rekdal Chief of Training Norway Updated: January 25, 2015

AERODROMES PANEL (AP) SECOND MEETING OF THE AERODROMES PANEL WORKING GROUPS (APWGs/2)

Preventing Runway Excursions. Landing on wet / Contaminated Runways

Preventing Runway Excursions. Landing on wet / Contaminated Runways

Edmonton International Airport

Edmonton International Airport

A NEW WINTER Flygplatsdagen 2018 Arlanda. Bjoern Boe CAA - Norway. Luftfartstilsynet T: F:

Edmonton International Airport YXD City Centre Airport

Inspection of. Aerodrome Lighting Federal Aviation 1. Administration

Automated Braking Action Report for assessment of the Runway Condition Code

Volcanic Ash Guidance Material Docs. 9766, 9691 and 9974

AERODROME METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATION AND FORECAST STUDY GROUP (AMOFSG)

AOP 16 Winter Operations (Aerodrome Operating Procedure)

CHAPTER 3 HELIPORT AND HELICOPTER STAGEFIELD LIGHTING SYSTEMS

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...

2014 / 2015 PRESEASON WICHITA MID-CONTINENT AIRPORT. Snow and Ice Control Committee (SICC) WINTER OPERATIONS AND SAFETY MEETING

Edmonton International Airport

Guidance on Aeronautical Meteorological Observer Competency Standards

GEN 3.5 METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES

Implementation Guidance of Aeronautical Meteorological Observer Competency Standards

Pilot briefing ENTC - Tromsø airport, Langnes

CITY OF BEAVER DAM SNOW & ICE REMOVAL POLICY

Manufacturer s Perspective- Runway Friction and Aircraft Performance

Airport Services Manual

Auburn Lewiston Airport. Snow and Ice Removal Plan

AIRPORTOPS BY REINHARD MOOK. Aircraft braking coefficient is affected by liquid water in frozen runway contamination.

S N O W P L A N / Keflavík International Airport

ROAD WEATHER INFORMATION SYSTEM DEVICE TESTING LEVEL C

GEN 3.5 METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES

AERODROME METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATION AND FORECAST STUDY GROUP (AMOFSG)

Three-Dimensional Aerial Zoning around a Lebanese Airport

AERODROME METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATION AND FORECAST STUDY GROUP (AMOFSG)

55 th CONFERENCE OF DIRECTORS GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION ASIA AND PACIFIC REGION

WORLD AREA FORECAST SYSTEM OPERATIONS GROUP (WAFSOPSG)

IMS4 ARWIS. Airport Runway Weather Information System. Real-time data, forecasts and early warnings

JAA Administrative & Guidance Material Section Five: Licensing, Part Two: Procedures

Airport Winter Maintenance Plan - YPA. Table of Contents

METEOROLOGICAL WARNINGS STUDY GROUP (METWSG)

1. Major streets, Central Business District (CBD) and school bus routes. 2. Local streets 3. Downtown parking lots

Airport Meteorology Analysis

MEASUREMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS AT AERONAUTICAL METEOROLOGICAL STATIONS

The Importance of Measuring Water Film Depth

Cloud Top Height Product: Product Guide

CMO Terminal Aerodrome Forecast (TAF) Verification Programme (CMOTafV)

Montréal, 7 to 18 July 2014

Deutscher Wetterdienst

NINTH MEETING DISPLAY IN ATS UNITS. (Presented SUMMARY

Aeronautical Information Service

National Climatic Data Center DATA DOCUMENTATION FOR DATA SET 6406 (DSI-6406) ASOS SURFACE 1-MINUTE, PAGE 2 DATA. July 12, 2006

the issue of for Aviation

SCOPE: Outlines standard techniques for setting up and conducting voice communication and broadcasting ATIS at Hong Kong VACC

IOWA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 22 IOWA COUNTY SNOW & ICE POLICY

Implementation Guidance of Aeronautical Meteorological Forecaster Competency Standards

CHAPTER CONTENTS REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING Page

Montréal, 7 to 18 July 2014

QUICK REFERENCE FOR PRECAUTIONARY TREATMENT DECISION MAKING

SCOUT AIR ACTIVITY CENTRE- VICTORIA Scout Air Activity Target Badge Adventurer Level

AERODROME METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATION AND FORECAST STUDY GROUP (AMOFSG)

Establishment of Space Weather Information Service

Winter Maintenance on Ontario s Highways

SERIOUS INCIDENT. Aircraft Type and Registration: 2) Embraer EMB 121 Xingu F-TEZZ. Date & Time (UTC): 1 June 2010 at 1000 hrs.

Road Weather Management Program

Math 135 Intermediate Algebra. Homework 3 Solutions

METEOROLOGY PANEL (METP) WORKING GROUP- METEOROLOGICAL OPERATION GROUP (MOG) FIRST MEETING

Use of lightning data to improve observations for aeronautical activities

Airbus A320 registered TS-IMC Date and time 12 March 2013 at 10 h 15 UTC (1) Operator

NJ SURVEYORS CONFERENCE

CITY OF MINOT SNOW REMOVAL PLAN October 2018

Resolution Number: (2) Resolution Title: Snow Policy Date Signed: 11/26/12. DAVIS COUNTY Snow Policy Resolution

FAA-NWS Aviation Weather Requirements Working Group (ARWG)

City of Camrose Winter Road Maintenance Policy

GUIDANCE MATERIAL ON WINTER CONDITIONS FOR THE EUROPEAN REGION

Cloud Top Height Product: Product Guide

Service improvement through integration of AIM, MET and ATM Information Services

SCOPE: Outlines standard techniques for setting up and conducting voice communication and broadcasting ATIS at Hong Kong VACC

Regression Models for Forecasting Fog and Poor Visibility at Donmuang Airport in Winter

RESOLUTION NO INTRODUCTION

WACEL AGGREGATE LABORATORY TESTING TECHNICIAN

AERODROMES PANEL (AP) VISUAL AIDS WORKING GROUP (VAWG) FIFTH MEETING. Montréal, Canada, 25 to 27 June 2008

TAF CCCC YYGGggZ YYHHHH dddff(f)gffkt VVVVSM [ww NNNhhh] [Wshhh/dddffKT] [TTTTT xxxx] repeated as needed

RPMO - OZAMIS COMMUNITY AIRPORT

1,836 people die and 136,309 people are injured every year from icy roads in the US.

An Application of the Improved Models for Risk Assessment of Runway Excursion in Korea

Maritime Weather Information: Automatic Reporting, A New Paradigm

SEVIRI - Cloud Top Height Factsheet

SIRWEC th International Road Weather Conference

DELAWARE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 3

KEY TO DECODING THE U.S. METAR OBSERVATION REPORT

Efficiency of runway de-icing chemicals in practice ABSTRACT. Ville Alatyppö. WSP Finland ltd.

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)

Winter-Weather Forecast Research

NASHUA AIRPORT AUTHORITY SNOW AND ICE CONTROL PLAN

UNITED STATES ARMY AVIATION BOARD Fort Rucker, Alabama

International Civil Aviation Organization

Guidance to Instructors on Subject Delivery PILOT NAVIGATION. This is a suggested programme for the delivery of this subject.

CEDAR COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 6

WMO Aeronautical Meteorology Scientific Conference 2017

Municipal Act, 2001 Loi de 2001 sur les municipalités

Meteorological Service for International Air Navigation

MEETING OF THE METEOROLOGY PANEL (METP) WORKING GROUP MOG (WAFS)

Transcription:

GUYANA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY 73 High Street Kingston Georgetown GUYANA TEL. NOs: (592) 225 6822, 225 0778, 227 8111 FAX: (592) 225 6800 E-mail: director-general@gcaa-gy.org GCAA ADVISORY CIRCULAR AERODROME & GROUND AID AC NO: GCAA AC/AGA/001 SUBJECT: AERODROME PAVEMENT REPORT DATE INITIATED: JULY 15, 2016 INITIATED BY: DIRECTOR AVIATION SAFETY REGULATION 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this Advisory Circular (AC) is to provide guidance to aerodrome operators on the procedures acceptable to the Authority for the evaluation of pavement condition and the reporting method. 2. GENERAL INFORMATION/CANCELLATION a. This Advisory Circular GCAA AC/AGA/001 is an initial issue and the effective date is January 1, 2017. b. The Civil Aviation (Aerodromes) Regulations require that aerodrome operators report aerodrome pavement condition to allow users to make necessary adjustments in the interest of safety. c. This AC applies to all aerodrome operators in Guyana and provides basic information applicable for the standardisation of pavement condition reports. 3. RELATED REFERENCES Civil Aviation (Aerodromes) Regulations. 4. CONTACT INFORMATION Director General of Civil Aviation @ Address and contact information shown in the header, or Director, Aviation Safety Regulation Phone: (592) 225 0778, Ext. 104 E-mail: dasr@gcaa-gy.org 5. DEFINITION a. Damp Runway A runway is considered damp when there is a change of color on the surface due to moisture. It is when the surface is not dry, but when the water does not give it a shiny appearance. There are no performance corrections required for a damp runway. b. Dry Runway A runway is considered dry when the surface of the runway is clear of water, snow or ice. It is when no more than 25 percent of the runway surface area within the reported length and width being used is covered by visible moisture (including a damp runway). A dry runway is one which is neither wet nor contaminated, and includes those paved runways which have been specially prepared with grooves or porous pavement and maintained to retain 'effectively dry' braking action even when moisture is present. STATUS: Issue 1 EFFECTIVE DATE: August 1, 2016 Page 1 of 6

c. Slippery When Wet Runway - A runway where a friction survey, conducted for pavement evaluation/friction deterioration shows that more than 25 percent of the runway length does not meet the minimum friction level. d. Standing Water It is the accumulation of patches of water that are visible on the runway. e. Wet Runway - A runway is considered wet when the surface of the runway is soaked but there are no significant patches of standing water. It is when more than 25 percent of the runway surface area within the reported length and width being used is covered by any visible dampness or any water up to and including 1/8-inch (3 mm) deep. 6. PAVEMENT CONTAMINATION REPORT FORM Each aerodrome operator shall develop a Pavement Contamination Report Form which must include the following: a. Aerodrome name and location indicator; b. Date and time of observation; c. Time of completion of report in UTC; d. Runway designator (the lower designation number); e. Cleared runway length, if less than published length (m); f. Cleared runway width, if less than published width (m); if offset left or right of centre line add 'L' or 'R'; g. Runway Condition (observed on each third of the runway, starting from threshold having the lower runway designation number): 6 Clear and Dry 5 Damp or Standing water up to 3mm deep 4 Not Applicable 3 Wet and slippery (reduced runway friction) 2 Standing water more than 3mm 1 Not Applicable 0 Not Applicable NOTE 1: The aerodrome operator shall report a runway condition as Code 5 if the applicable third of the runway is wet and the runway evaluation is above the acceptable runway friction coefficient. NOTE 2: The aerodrome operator shall report a runway condition as Code 3 for all applicable thirds of the runway when wet if the runway evaluation fails the acceptable runway friction coefficient. The aerodrome operator shall report a runway condition as Code 5 if the applicable third of the runway is wet and the runway evaluation is above the acceptable runway friction coefficient. The aerodrome operator shall report the deteriorated condition of the runway through the normal airport NOTAM system. STATUS: Issue 1 EFFECTIVE DATE: August 1, 2016 Page 2 of 6

h. Percentage coverage of contaminant for each runway third: 00-10 % NR 10 25 % 25 25 50% 50 50 75% 75 75 100 % 100 i. Mean depth (mm) for each third of total runway length above 4mm. j. Estimated surface friction on each third of runway) estimated surface friction: Good 5 Medium/Good 4 Medium 3 Medium/Poor 2 Poor 1 k. The intermediate values of "medium/good" and "medium/poor" provide for more precise information in the estimate when conditions are found to be between medium and either good or poor: Taxiway (if no appropriate taxiway is available, insert "no"); Apron (if unusable insert "no"); Remarks (including contaminant coverage and other operationally significant information); and Signature of personnel making the observation. 7. RUNWAY SURFACE CONDITION The following factors may influence a reassessment of the runway surface condition: a. Precipitation; b. Changing temperatures; c. Effects of winds; and d. Pilot's report. 8. OBSERVED INFORMATION REPORT Any runway contamination observed shall be reported to the Air Traffic Services to be passed on to other aircraft. If the runway friction is reduced to 2 then this information shall be reported to the AIS for the promulgation of a NOTAM. Approved By: Chaitrani Heeralall Director General of Civil Aviation (ag.) Guyana Civil Aviation Authority STATUS: Issue 1 EFFECTIVE DATE: August 1, 2016 Page 3 of 6

APPENDIX: 1 SAMPLE PAVEMENT CONTAMINATION REPORT FORM PAVEMENT CONTAMINATION REPORT FORM FORM #: AERODROME LOCATION INDICATOR A. DATE-TIME OF OBSERVATION (Time of completion of measurement in UTC) B. RUNWAY DESIGNATOR C. CLEARED RUNWAY LENGTH, IF LESS THAN PUBLISHED LENGTH (m) D. CLEARED RUNWAY WIDTH, IF LESS THAN PUBLISHED WIDTH (m; If offset left or right of centre add "L" or "R") E. DEPOSITS OVER TOTAL RUNWAY LENGTH (Observed on each third of the runway, starting from threshold having the lower runway designation number) F. /.../ 6 - CLEAR AND DRY 5 - DAMP OR STANDING WATER UP TO 3MM DEEP 4 - NOT APPLICABLE 3 - WET AND SLIPPERY (REDUCED RUNWAY FRICTION) 2 - STANDING WATER MORE THAN 3MM 1 - NOT APPLICABLE 0 - NOT APPLICABLE MEAN DEPTH (mm) FOR EACH THIRD OF TOTAL RUNWAY LENGTH G. ESTIMATED SURFACE FRICTION ON EACH THIRD OF RUNWAY H. /.../ (ESTIMATED SURFACE FRICTION) Good - 5 Medium/Good - 4 Medium - 3 Medium/Poor - 2 Poor - 1 (The intermediate values of "MEDIUM/GOOD" and "MEDIUM POOR" provide for more precise information in the estimate when conditions are found to be between medium and either good or poor). RUNWAY LIGHTS (If obscured, insert "YES" followed by "L", "R" or both "LR", if applicable)) I. FURTHER CLEARANCE (If planned, insert length (m)/width (m) to be cleared or if to full dimensions, insert "TOTAL") J. FURTHER CLEARANCE EXPECTED TO BE COMPLETED BY. (UTC) K. TAXIWAY (If no appropriate taxiway is available, insert "NO") L. APRON (If unusable, insert "NO") M. NEXT PLANNED OBSERVATION/MEASUREMENT IS FOR (Month/Day/Hour in UTC) N. PLAIN-LANGUAGE REMARKS (Including contaminant coverage and other operationally significant information, e.g. sanding, etc.) O. ) NOTE 1: Enter ICAO Nationality Letters as given in ICAO Doc. 7910, Part 2. NOTE 2: Information on other runways, repeat from B. to L. NOTE 3: Words in Brackets ( ) not to be transmitted. SIGNATURE OF ORIGINATOR (Not for transmission) STATUS: Issue 1 EFFECTIVE DATE: August 1, 2016 Page 4 of 6

INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE PAVEMENT CONTAMINATION FORM GENERAL: 1. When reporting on more than one runway, repeat Items "B" to "L" inclusive. 2. Items together with their indicator must be dropped completely, where no information is to be included. 3. Metric units must be used and the unit of measurement not reported. 4. The maximum validity of observation is 12 hours. New observation must be issued whenever there is a significant change in runway conditions. The following changes relating to runway conditions are considered as significant: a) a change in the coefficient of friction of about 0.05; b) a change in the available length or width of a runway of 10 per cent or more; c) any other conditions known to be significant according to experience or local circumstances. 5. Item A. Aerodrome location indicator (four-letter location indicator). 6. Item B. Eight-figure date/time group giving time of observation as month, day, hour and minute in UTC; this item must always be completed. 7. Item C. Lower runway designator number. 8. Item D. Cleared runway length in metres, if less than published length (see Item T on reporting on part of runway not cleared). 9. Item E. Cleared runway width in metres, if less than published width; if offset left or right of centre line, add (without space) "L" or "R", as viewed from the threshold having the lower runway designation number. 10. Item F. Deposit over total runway length as explained in PAVEMENT CONTAMINATION FORM. Suitable combinations of these numbers may be used to indicate varying conditions over runway segments. If more than one deposit is present on the same portion of the runway, they should be reported in sequence from the top (closest to the sky) to the bottom (closest to the runway). Drifts, depths of deposit appreciably greater than the average values or other significant characteristics of the deposits may be reported under Item T in plain language. The values for each third of the runway shall be separated by an oblique stroke (/), without space between the deposit values and the oblique stroke, for example: 47/47/47. o Item G. Mean depth in millimetres deposit for each third of total runway length, or "XX" if not measurable or operationally not significant. The values for each third of the runway shall be separated by an oblique stroke (/), without space between the values and the oblique stroke, for example: 20/20/20. 11. Item H. Estimated surface friction on each third of the runway (single digit) in the order from the threshold having the lower runway designation number. 12. Item I. If runway lights are obscured, insert "YES" followed (without space) by "L", "R" or both "LR", as viewed from the threshold having the lower runway designation number. 13. Item J. When further clearance will be undertaken, enter length and width of runway or TOTAL if runway will be cleared to full dimensions. 14. Item K. Enter the anticipated time of completion in UTC. STATUS: Issue 1 EFFECTIVE DATE: August 1, 2016 Page 5 of 6

15. Item L. The code (and combination of codes) for Item F may be used to describe taxiway conditions; enter NO if no taxiways serving the associated runway are available. 16. Item M. The code (and combination of codes) for Item F may be used to describe apron conditions; enter NO if the apron is unusable. 17. Item N. Enter the anticipated time of next observation/measurement in UTC. 18. Item O. Describe in plain language any operationally significant information but always report on length of uncleared runway (Item D) and extent of runway contamination (Item F) for each third of the runway (if appropriate) in accordance with the following scale: RWY CONTAMINATION 10 PER CENT if 10% or less of runway contaminated. RWY CONTAMINATION 25 PER CENT if 11 25% of runway contaminated. RWY CONTAMINATION 50 PER CENT if 26 50% of runway contaminated. RWY CONTAMINATION 100 PER CENT if 51 100% of runway contaminated. END STATUS: Issue 1 EFFECTIVE DATE: August 1, 2016 Page 6 of 6