Splittings of singular fibers and vanishing cycles

Similar documents
Splittings of singular fibers into Lefschetz fibers

Lefschetz pencils and the symplectic topology of complex surfaces

Hyperelliptic Lefschetz fibrations and the Dirac braid

Symplectic 4-manifolds, singular plane curves, and isotopy problems

KODAIRA DIMENSION OF LEFSCHETZ FIBRATIONS OVER TORI

Exotic Lefschetz Fibrations and Stein Fillings with Arbitrary Fundamental Group

THE CANONICAL PENCILS ON HORIKAWA SURFACES

THE EXISTENCE PROBLEM

Periodic homeomorphisms on surfaces and singular points of curves

Lefschetz Fibrations and Exotic Stein Fillings with Arbitrary Fundamental Group via Luttinger Surgery

MINIMAL NUMBER OF SINGULAR FIBERS IN A LEFSCHETZ FIBRATION

FUNDAMENTAL GROUPS OF COMPLEMENTS OF PLANE CURVES AND SYMPLECTIC INVARIANTS

Broken pencils and four-manifold invariants. Tim Perutz (Cambridge)

FINITELY GENERATING THE MAPPING CLASS GROUP WITH DEHN TWISTS

Part II. Riemann Surfaces. Year

Mapping Class Groups MSRI, Fall 2007 Day 8, October 25

Stein fillings of contact 3-manifolds obtained as Legendrian sur

Fibered Faces and Dynamics of Mapping Classes

On the topology of H(2)

HYPERELLIPTIC LEFSCHETZ FIBRATIONS AND BRANCHED COVERING SPACES. Terry Fuller

arxiv: v3 [math.ag] 15 Oct 2017

DIFFEOMORPHISMS OF SURFACES AND SMOOTH 4-MANIFOLDS

ZARISKI k-plets VIA DESSINS D ENFANTS. Alex Degtyarev. 1. Introduction

Complex Algebraic Geometry: Smooth Curves Aaron Bertram, First Steps Towards Classifying Curves. The Riemann-Roch Theorem is a powerful tool

FAMILIES OF ALGEBRAIC CURVES AS SURFACE BUNDLES OF RIEMANN SURFACES

Riemann surfaces. Paul Hacking and Giancarlo Urzua 1/28/10

DEHN TWISTS AND INVARIANT CLASSES

LANTERN SUBSTITUTION AND NEW SYMPLECTIC 4-MANIFOLDS WITH b 2 + = 3 arxiv: v2 [math.gt] 24 May 2014

The geometry of Landau-Ginzburg models

Algebraic geometry over quaternions

Math 213br HW 3 solutions

Lagrangian knottedness and unknottedness in rational surfaces

SYMPLECTIC LEFSCHETZ FIBRATIONS ALEXANDER CAVIEDES CASTRO

SYMPLECTIC 4-MANIFOLDS, SINGULAR PLANE CURVES, AND ISOTOPY PROBLEMS

Combinatorial equivalence of topological polynomials and group theory

Corollary. Let X Y be a dominant map of varieties, with general fiber F. If Y and F are rationally connected, then X is.

CONSIDERATION OF COMPACT MINIMAL SURFACES IN 4-DIMENSIONAL FLAT TORI IN TERMS OF DEGENERATE GAUSS MAP

ON THE NIELSEN-THURSTON-BERS TYPE OF SOME SELF-MAPS OF RIEMANN SURFACES WITH TWO SPECIFIED POINTS

MAPPING CLASS ACTIONS ON MODULI SPACES. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math 9 (2003),

HURWITZ EQUIVALENCE OF BRAID MONODROMIES AND EXTREMAL ELLIPTIC SURFACES. Alex Degtyarev

THE QUANTUM CONNECTION

Kähler manifolds and variations of Hodge structures

A Criterion for Flatness of Sections of Adjoint Bundle of a Holomorphic Principal Bundle over a Riemann Surface

Singularities, Root Systems, and W-Algebras

ON HYPERBOLIC SURFACE BUNDLES OVER THE CIRCLE AS BRANCHED DOUBLE COVERS OF THE 3-SPHERE

K3 Surfaces and Lattice Theory

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 45

Hodge Theory of Maps

Pseudo-Anosov braids with small entropy and the magic 3-manifold

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 4 Aug 2008

Hodge structures from differential equations

Algebraic Curves and Riemann Surfaces

CONSTRUCTING LEFSCHETZ FIBRATIONS VIA DAISY SUBSTITUTIONS arxiv: v3 [math.gt] 19 May 2015

Connected components of representation spaces

X 0 is of the form Ɣ\B 2 and the map B 2 X 0

. A formula for the geometric genus of surface singularities. Tomohiro Okuma

Inverse Galois Problem for C(t)

ON A DISTANCE DEFINED BY THE LENGTH SPECTRUM ON TEICHMÜLLER SPACE

Symplectic varieties and Poisson deformations

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gt] 22 Jan 2005

APPROXIMATE YANG MILLS HIGGS METRICS ON FLAT HIGGS BUNDLES OVER AN AFFINE MANIFOLD. 1. Introduction

Generalized Tian-Todorov theorems

Topics in Geometry: Mirror Symmetry

Lefschetz Fibrations of 4-Dimensional Manifolds

Conformal field theory in the sense of Segal, modified for a supersymmetric context

Action of mapping class group on extended Bers slice

MONODROMY INVARIANTS IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

Abelian Varieties and Complex Tori: A Tale of Correspondence

Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 40(3)

HYPERBOLIC GEOMETRY AND HEEGAARD SPLITTINGS

Stable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies

PROBLEMS FOR VIASM MINICOURSE: GEOMETRY OF MODULI SPACES LAST UPDATED: DEC 25, 2013

COMBINATORIALLY CONVEX MODULI AND AN EXAMPLE OF GÖDEL

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

Explicit Examples of Strebel Differentials

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 30 Apr 2018

Mathematical Research Letters 2, (1995) A VANISHING THEOREM FOR SEIBERG-WITTEN INVARIANTS. Shuguang Wang

Visualizing the unit ball for the Teichmüller metric

4-MANIFOLDS AS FIBER BUNDLES

The Geometry of Character Varieties

Introduction to Teichmüller theory, old and new, II

TROPICAL BRILL-NOETHER THEORY

Inflection Points on Real Plane Curves Having Many Pseudo-Lines

Alexandru Oancea (Strasbourg) joint with Gwénaël Massuyeau (Strasbourg) and Dietmar Salamon (Zurich) Conference Braids in Paris, September 2008

Isogeny invariance of the BSD conjecture

ON KIRBY CALCULUS FOR NULL-HOMOTOPIC FRAMED LINKS IN 3-MANIFOLDS

Number Theory/Representation Theory Notes Robbie Snellman ERD Spring 2011

A CONJECTURE ON RATIONAL APPROXIMATIONS TO RATIONAL POINTS

Linear connections on Lie groups

AN INTRODUCTION TO MODULI SPACES OF CURVES CONTENTS

Classifying complex surfaces and symplectic 4-manifolds

1 Structures 2. 2 Framework of Riemann surfaces Basic configuration Holomorphic functions... 3

Zariski s moduli problem for plane branches and the classification of Legendre curve singularities

Rational Curves On K3 Surfaces

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 8 Nov 2018

Singular fibers in Lefschetz fibrations on manifolds with b + 2 = 1

Geometric representations of the braid groups

Hurwitz equivalence of braid monodromies and extremal elliptic surfaces

Finiteness of the Moderate Rational Points of Once-punctured Elliptic Curves. Yuichiro Hoshi

Holomorphic maps between Riemann surfaces of small genera

Transcription:

OP Splittings of singular fibers and vanishing cycles Takayuki OKUDA the University of Tokyo Kanazawa University Satellite Plaza January 18, 2017

Preliminary Degenerations and their splitting deformations

Degeneration of Riemann surfaces M : a smooth complex surface : the unit disk in C π : M : a proper surjective holomorphic map s.t. X s := π 1 (s) (s 0) are smooth curves of genus g. X 0 := π 1 (0) is a singular fiber. ( 0 is a unique critical value.) π : M is called a degeneration (or, degenerating family) of Riemann surfaces of genus g. Regard X 0 as the divisor defined by π: X 0 = m i Θ i, where Θ i is an irreducible component with multiplicity m i. 3 / 19

Degeneration of Riemann surfaces M : a smooth complex surface : the unit disk in C π : M : a proper surjective holomorphic map s.t. X s := π 1 (s) (s 0) are smooth curves of genus g. X 0 := π 1 (0) is a singular fiber. ( 0 is a unique critical value.) π : M is called a degeneration (or, degenerating family) of Riemann surfaces of genus g. Regard X 0 as the divisor defined by π: X 0 = m i Θ i, where Θ i is an irreducible component with multiplicity m i. 3 / 19

Degeneration of Riemann surfaces M : a smooth complex surface : the unit disk in C π : M : a proper surjective holomorphic map s.t. X s := π 1 (s) (s 0) are smooth curves of genus g. X 0 := π 1 (0) is a singular fiber. ( 0 is a unique critical value.) 1 3 π : M is called a degeneration (or, degenerating family) of Riemann surfaces of genus g. 2 Regard X 0 as the divisor defined by π: X 0 = m i Θ i, where Θ i is an irreducible component with multiplicity m i. 3 / 19

Degeneration of Riemann surfaces M : a smooth complex surface : the unit disk in C π : M : a proper surjective holomorphic map s.t. X s := π 1 (s) (s 0) are smooth curves of genus g. X 0 := π 1 (0) is a singular fiber. ( 0 is a unique critical value.) π : M is called a degeneration (or, degenerating family) of Riemann surfaces of genus g. Regard X 0 as the divisor defined by π: X 0 = m i Θ i, where Θ i is an irreducible component with multiplicity m i. 3 / 19

Degeneration of Riemann surfaces M : a smooth complex surface : the unit disk in C π : M : a proper surjective holomorphic map s.t. X s := π 1 (s) (s 0) are smooth curves of genus g. X 0 := π 1 (0) is a singular fiber. ( 0 is a unique critical value.) π : M is called a degeneration (or, degenerating family) of Riemann surfaces of genus g. Regard X 0 as the divisor defined by π: X 0 = m i Θ i, where Θ i is an irreducible component with multiplicity m i. 3 / 19

Degeneration of Riemann surfaces M : a smooth complex surface : the unit disk in C π : M : a proper surjective holomorphic map s.t. X s := π 1 (s) (s 0) are smooth curves of genus g. X 0 := π 1 (0) is a singular fiber. ( 0 is a unique critical value.) π : M is called a degeneration (or, degenerating family) of Riemann surfaces of genus g. Regard X 0 as the divisor defined by π: X 0 = m i Θ i, where Θ i is an irreducible component with multiplicity m i. 3 / 19

Splitting of singular fibers 4 / 19 π : M : a degeneration w/ singular fiber X 0 {π t : M t } : a family of deformations of π : M i.e. π 0 : M 0 coincides with π : M. If π t (t 0) has k singular fibers X s1,..., X sk, k 2, = We say that X 0 splits into X s1,..., X sk.

Splitting of singular fibers 4 / 19 π : M : a degeneration w/ singular fiber X 0 {π t : M t } : a family of deformations of π : M i.e. π 0 : M 0 coincides with π : M. If π t (t 0) has k singular fibers X s1,..., X sk, k 2, = We say that X 0 splits into X s1,..., X sk.

Splittability of singular fibers 5 / 19 How to construct splittings Double covering method Moishezon (genus 1 case), Horikawa (genus 2 case), Arakawa-Ashikaga (hyperelliptic case) Barking deformation Takamura (some criterion) Fact (Atoms of singular fibers) (1) A Lefschetz fiber and (2) a multiple smooth fiber admit no splittings (i.e. any deformation is equisingular). Conjecture (from a topological viewpoint) Every singular fiber can split into singular fibers each of which is (1) or (2), in finite steps of deformations.

Splittability of singular fibers 5 / 19 How to construct splittings Double covering method Moishezon (genus 1 case), Horikawa (genus 2 case), Arakawa-Ashikaga (hyperelliptic case) Barking deformation Takamura (some criterion) Fact (Atoms of singular fibers) (1) A Lefschetz fiber and (2) a multiple smooth fiber admit no splittings (i.e. any deformation is equisingular). Conjecture (from a topological viewpoint) Every singular fiber can split into singular fibers each of which is (1) or (2), in finite steps of deformations.

Splittability of singular fibers 5 / 19 How to construct splittings Double covering method Moishezon (genus 1 case), Horikawa (genus 2 case), Arakawa-Ashikaga (hyperelliptic case) Barking deformation Takamura (some criterion) Fact (Atoms of singular fibers) (1) A Lefschetz fiber and (2) a multiple smooth fiber admit no splittings (i.e. any deformation is equisingular). Conjecture (from a topological viewpoint) Every singular fiber can split into singular fibers each of which is (1) or (2), in finite steps of deformations.

Splittability of singular fibers 5 / 19 How to construct splittings Double covering method Moishezon (genus 1 case), Horikawa (genus 2 case), Arakawa-Ashikaga (hyperelliptic case) Barking deformation Takamura (some criterion) Fact (Atoms of singular fibers) (1) A Lefschetz fiber and (2) a multiple smooth fiber admit no splittings (i.e. any deformation is equisingular). Conjecture (from a topological viewpoint) Every singular fiber can split into singular fibers each of which is (1) or (2), in finite steps of deformations.

Splittability of singular fibers 5 / 19 How to construct splittings Double covering method Moishezon (genus 1 case), Horikawa (genus 2 case), Arakawa-Ashikaga (hyperelliptic case) Barking deformation Takamura (some criterion) Fact (Atoms of singular fibers) (1) A Lefschetz fiber and (2) a multiple smooth fiber admit no splittings (i.e. any deformation is equisingular). Conjecture (from a topological viewpoint) Every singular fiber can split into singular fibers each of which is (1) or (2), in finite steps of deformations.

Topological classification π : M is topologically equivalent to another degeneration π : M df ori. preserving homeomorphisms H : M M, h: s.t. h π = π H. Theorem (Terasoma) Top. equivalent degenerations are deformation equivalent. M π H M π h The top. classes of degenerations are completely determined by their topological monodromies. Theorem (Imayoshi, Shiga-Tanigawa, Earle-Sipe) Every topological monodromy is pseudo-periodic of negative twist. 6 / 19

Topological classification π : M is topologically equivalent to another degeneration π : M df ori. preserving homeomorphisms H : M M, h: s.t. h π = π H. Theorem (Terasoma) Top. equivalent degenerations are deformation equivalent. M π H M π h The top. classes of degenerations are completely determined by their topological monodromies. Theorem (Imayoshi, Shiga-Tanigawa, Earle-Sipe) Every topological monodromy is pseudo-periodic of negative twist. 6 / 19

Topological classification π : M is topologically equivalent to another degeneration π : M df ori. preserving homeomorphisms H : M M, h: s.t. h π = π H. Theorem (Terasoma) Top. equivalent degenerations are deformation equivalent. M π H M π h The top. classes of degenerations are completely determined by their topological monodromies. Theorem (Imayoshi, Shiga-Tanigawa, Earle-Sipe) Every topological monodromy is pseudo-periodic of negative twist. 6 / 19

Topological classification π : M is topologically equivalent to another degeneration π : M df ori. preserving homeomorphisms H : M M, h: s.t. h π = π H. Theorem (Terasoma) Top. equivalent degenerations are deformation equivalent. M π H M π h The top. classes of degenerations are completely determined by their topological monodromies. Theorem (Imayoshi, Shiga-Tanigawa, Earle-Sipe) Every topological monodromy is pseudo-periodic of negative twist. 6 / 19

Topological classification Theorem (Matsumoto-Montesinos, 91/92) top. equiv. classes of conj. classes in MCG g of 1:1 minimal degenerations of pseudo-periodic mapp. classes Riemann surfs. of genus g of negative twist via topological monodromy, for g 2. plefschetz fiber Right-handed Dehn twist 7 / 19

Topological classification Theorem (Matsumoto-Montesinos, 91/92) top. equiv. classes of conj. classes in MCG g of 1:1 minimal degenerations of pseudo-periodic mapp. classes Riemann surfs. of genus g of negative twist via topological monodromy, for g 2. pmultiple smooth fiber Periodic mapping class w/o multiple points 7 / 19

Topological classification Theorem (Matsumoto-Montesinos, 91/92) top. equiv. classes of conj. classes in MCG g of 1:1 minimal degenerations of pseudo-periodic mapp. classes Riemann surfs. of genus g of negative twist via topological monodromy, for g 2. pstellar fiber Periodic mapping class 7 / 19

Topological classification Theorem (Matsumoto-Montesinos, 91/92) top. equiv. classes of conj. classes in MCG g of 1:1 minimal degenerations of pseudo-periodic mapp. classes Riemann surfs. of genus g of negative twist via topological monodromy, for g 2. psingular fiber Pseudo-periodic mapping class of negative twist 7 / 19

Topics Splittability into Lefschetz fibers

Degeneration of propeller surfaces 9 / 19 A propeller surface is a Riemann surface Σ g of genus g 2 equipped with Z g -action s.t. Σ g /Z g has genus 1. ω g : a propeller automorphism X g : the singular fiber with monodromy ω g M X 5 5 3 21 4 1 ω 5 π 0

Case g = 2 10 / 19 Theorem (Y. Matsumoto) π : M : the degeneration of Riemann surfaces of genus 2 with monodromy ω 2 Then its singular fiber X 2 can split into four Lefschetz fibers. Moreover, their vanishing cycles are as depicted below. ω ω 2 X 2

Case g = 2 10 / 19 Theorem (Y. Matsumoto) π : M : the degeneration of Riemann surfaces of genus 2 with monodromy ω 2 Then its singular fiber X 2 can split into four Lefschetz fibers. Moreover, their vanishing cycles are as depicted below. ω ω 2

Psudo-propeller maps ω (2) 3 X (2) 3 1 2 n = 2 γ m = 3 m = 3 1 } n = 2 γ : a separating simple loop on Σ g s.t. Σ g \ γ = Σ m,1 Σn,1 (g = m + n, m 1, n 0) : a psudo-periodic map satisfying ω (n) m X (n) m ω (n) m Σm,1 a periodic map with a fixed pt of rot angle 2π m. ω (n) m Σn,1 id. NOTE: (ω (n) m )m = τ γ : the singular fiber with monodromy ω(n) m 11 / 19

ω (2) 3 2π 3 id n = 2 γ Psudo-propeller maps X (2) 3 1 2 m = 3 m = 3 1 } n = 2 γ : a separating simple loop on Σ g s.t. Σ g \ γ = Σ m,1 Σn,1 (g = m + n, m 1, n 0) : a psudo-periodic map satisfying ω (n) m X (n) m ω (n) m Σm,1 a periodic map with a fixed pt of rot angle 2π m. ω (n) m Σn,1 id. NOTE: (ω (n) m )m = τ γ : the singular fiber with monodromy ω(n) m 11 / 19

Psudo-propeller maps 11 / 19 X (1) 4 3 21 4 1 X (0) 5 5 1 4 32 1 ω (1) 4 ω (0) 5 = ω 5 γ

Psudo-propeller maps 11 / 19 X (3) 2 2 1 X (4) 1 1 ω (3) 2 γ ω (4) 1 = τ γ

Results Theorem (O-Takamura) 1 For any m 2, n 0, the singular fiber X (n) m can split into X(n+1) m 1 and three Lefschetz fibers. 2 For any g 2, we have the following sequence: X (0) g X (1) g 1 X (g 2) 2 X (g 1) 1, where A B means A splits into B and 3 Lefschetz fibers. X (n) m m 2 1 m 1 1 } n X (n+1) 1 m 1 m 2 m 1 1 } n + 1 12 / 19

Results Theorem (O-Takamura) 1 For any m 2, n 0, the singular fiber X (n) m can split into X(n+1) m 1 and three Lefschetz fibers. 2 For any g 2, we have the following sequence: X (0) g X (1) g 1 X (g 2) 2 X (g 1) 1, where A B means A splits into B and 3 Lefschetz fibers. X (n) m m 2 1 m 1 1 } n X (n+1) 1 1 m 1 m 2 m 1 1 } n + 1 12 / 19

Results Theorem (O-Takamura) 1 For any m 2, n 0, the singular fiber X (n) m can split into X(n+1) m 1 and three Lefschetz fibers. 2 For any g 2, we have the following sequence: X (0) g X (1) g 1 X (g 2) 2 X (g 1) 1, where A B means A splits into B and 3 Lefschetz fibers. X (n) m m 2 1 m 1 1 } n X (n+1) 1 1 m 1 m 2 m 1 1 } n + 1 12 / 19

Results 13 / 19 X (n) m X(n+1) m 1 g = 2 2 g = 3 g = 4

Results 13 / 19 X (n) m X(n+1) m 1 g = 2 2 g = 3 3 2 g = 4

Results 13 / 19 X (n) m X(n+1) m 1 g = 2 2 g = 3 3 2 g = 4

Results 13 / 19 X (n) m X(n+1) m 1 g = 2 2 g = 3 3 2 g = 4 4 3

Results 13 / 19 X (n) m X(n+1) m 1 g = 2 2 g = 3 3 2 g = 4 4 3 2

Results 13 / 19 X (n) m X(n+1) m 1 g = 2 2 g = 3 3 2 g = 4 4 3 2

Remark 14 / 19 Remark of Theorem 1 Generalization of Matsumoto s splitting for genus 2. 2 Analogous to adjacency diagrams of singularities: A 6 A 5 A 4 A 3 A 2 A 1 D 6 D 5 D 4 E 6 3 A splitting of a singular fiber into Lefschetz fibers gives a Dehn-twist expression of its topological monodromy.

Case g = 2 (bis) 15 / 19 Theorem (Y. Matsumoto) 1 The singular fiber X 2 can split into four Lefschetz fibers, and their vanishing cycles are as depicted below. 2 ω 2 = τ 0 τ a τ b τ c. ω ω 2 0 b a c

Case g = 2 (bis) 15 / 19 Theorem (Y. Matsumoto) 1 The singular fiber X 2 can split into four Lefschetz fibers, and their vanishing cycles are as depicted below. 2 ω 2 = τ 0 τ a τ b τ c. ω ω 2 0 b a c

Case g = 3 16 / 19 Proposition 1 X (0) 3 can split into X (1) 2 and three Lefshetz fibers, and their vanishing cycles are as depicted below. 2 ω 3 = ω (1) 2 τ a1 τ b1 τ c1. (1) ω2 ω 3 b 1 a 1 c 1

Case g = 3 16 / 19 Proposition 1 X (0) 3 can split into X (1) 2 and three Lefshetz fibers, and their vanishing cycles are as depicted below. 2 ω 3 = ω (1) 2 τ a1 τ b1 τ c1. (1) ω2 ω 3 b 1 a 1 c 1

Case g = 3 16 / 19 Proposition 1 X (1) 2 can split into four Lefshetz fibers (including X (2) 1 ), and their vanishing cycles are as depicted below. 2 ω (1) 2 = τ 0 τ a1 τ b1 τ c1. ω (1) 2 0 b 2 a 2 c 2

Case g = 3 16 / 19 Proposition 1 X (1) 2 can split into four Lefshetz fibers (including X (2) 1 ), and their vanishing cycles are as depicted below. 2 ω (1) 2 = τ 0 τ a1 τ b1 τ c1. ω (1) 2 0 b 2 a 2 c 2

Case g = 3 16 / 19 Proposition ω 3 = τ 0 (τ a2 τ b2 τ c2 ) (τ a1 τ b1 τ c1 ). 0 a 2 b 2 c 2 a 1 b 1 c 1

Dehn-twist expression 17 / 19 Theorem ω g = τ 0 (τ ag 1 τ bg 1 τ cg 1 ) (τ a1 τ b1 τ c1 ). 0 a g 1 b g 1 c g 1 a 1 b 1 c 1

Results 18 / 19 f MCG(Σ g ) : a periodic mapping class of order m b(f) := # {branch points of Σ g Σ g /f} p(f) := # {propeller points of f} h(f) fixed points of f with rotation angle ±1/m r(f) := q j /l j Z + : the total valency sum Theorem (O) X : the singular fiber equipped with periodic monodromy f Suppose f satisfies at least one of the following: b(f) p(f) r(f). b(f) p(f) 2, r(f) = 1 and genus(σ g /f) = 0. Then X can splits into Lefschetz fibers.

Results 18 / 19 f MCG(Σ g ) : a periodic mapping class of order m b(f) := # {branch points of Σ g Σ g /f} p(f) := # {propeller points of f} h(f) fixed points of f with rotation angle ±1/m r(f) := q j /l j Z + : the total valency sum Theorem (O) X : the singular fiber equipped with periodic monodromy f Suppose f satisfies at least one of the following: b(f) p(f) r(f). b(f) p(f) 2, r(f) = 1 and genus(σ g /f) = 0. Then X can splits into Lefschetz fibers.

Results 18 / 19 Remark of Theorem 1 If m = 2, 3, then X can split into Lefschetz fibers. 2 genus 1 2 3 4 5 6 # of periodic m.c. 8 17 47 72 76 203 # of periodic m.c. satisfying ( ) 8 14 30 41 35 # of powers of periodic m.c. satisfying ( ) 8 16 45 66 66

Ending Thank you for your attention.