n+a n +A *, A * γ+a, (2)

Similar documents
Measurements of the gamma-quanta angular distributions emitted from neutron inelastic scattering on 28 Si

A POSITION SENSITIVE ALPHA PARTICLE DETECTOR BASED ON A LYSO CRYSTAL AND A MICRO-PIXEL AVALANCHE PHOTODIODE

Alpha particle scintillation detector based on micro pixel avalanche photodiode and LYSO crystal

Gamma Detectors in Explosives and Narcotics Detection Systems

NEUTRON GENERATORS AND DAQ SYSTEMS FOR TAGGED NEUTRON TECHNOLOGY

Simulation of nonorganic scintillation detector response for the problems of active interrogation by tagged neutron technology

Using Neutron Generator with APT/NNA for Detection of Explosives

MCNP Simulations of Fast Neutron Scattering by Various Elements and their Compounds in View of Elaboration of a Single Shot Inspection System

Detection of Explosives and Other Illicit Materials by Nanosecond Neutron Analysis

The Use of Neutron Generators for the Detection of Illicit Materials in the Sea Transportation System

Plasma Accelerator for Detection of Hidden Objects by Using Nanosecond Impulse Neutron Inspection System (NINIS)

Powerful Nanosecond Single- Shot Technique for Detection of Illicit Materials and Explosives

This paper should be understood as an extended version of a talk given at the

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PIGE, PIXE AND NAA ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF MINOR ELEMENTS IN STEELS

Nuclear Cross-Section Measurements at the Manuel Lujan Jr. Neutron Scattering Center

Field Trips. Field Trips

Calculating standard captured spectra of formation elements

Unit 2: Atomic Structure Additional Practice

Chapter 30 Nuclear Physics and Radioactivity

Name: Date: Atomic Structure 2017 Mrs. Mannion Version 1

DETECTORS. I. Charged Particle Detectors

CHAPTER 12 TEST REVIEW

305 ATOMS, ELEMENTS, AND MINERALS

INSTRUMENTAL TECHNIQUE FOR THE DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF RADIOACTIVE, FISSILE AND EXTRA HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES

The Ones That Got Away: Neutron Leakage Spectra

The 46g BGO bolometer

Measurements of Neutron Total and Capture Cross Sections at the TOF spectrometers of the Moscow Meson Factory

Portable neutron generators of VNIIA and their applications

APPLICATION OF THE NUCLEAR REACTION ANALYSIS FOR AGING INVESTIGATIONS

305 ATOMS, ELEMENTS, AND MINERALS

Nuclear Physics Questions. 1. What particles make up the nucleus? What is the general term for them? What are those particles composed of?

305 ATOMS, ELEMENTS, AND MINERALS

11 Gamma Ray Energy and Absorption

NJCTL.org 2015 AP Physics 2 Nuclear Physics

305 ATOMS, ELEMENTS, AND MINERALS

Spectroscopy on Mars!

A. Aleksanyan, S. Amirkhanyan, H. Gulkanyan*, T. Kotanjyan, L. Poghosyan, V. Pogosov

Light ion recoil detector

REFERENCE SOURCES FOR THE CALIBRATION OF THE AUTOCORRELATION SINGLE-CRYSTAL SCINTILLATION TIME SPECTROMETER

300 ATOMS, ELEMENTS, AND MINERALS

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 8 Feb 2013

III. Energy Deposition in the Detector and Spectrum Formation

Nuclear Spectroscopy: Radioactivity and Half Life

College Physics B - PHY2054C

4. The mass of a proton is approximately equal to the mass of A an alpha particle C a positron. B a beta particle D a neutron

Radiation Detection for the Beta- Delayed Alpha and Gamma Decay of 20 Na. Ellen Simmons

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF NEUTRON FIELDS PRODUCED IN PROTON REACTIONS WITH HEAVY TARGETS. Nuclear Physics Institute AS CR, Rez Czech Republic

Radioactivity. Lecture 6 Detectors and Instrumentation

Physics 126 Practice Exam #4 Professor Siegel

hν' Φ e - Gamma spectroscopy - Prelab questions 1. What characteristics distinguish x-rays from gamma rays? Is either more intrinsically dangerous?

Detection of explosives and fissile material based on neutron generators, survey of techniques and methods. M. Bruggeman

Principles and Applications of Neutron Based Inspection Techniques. Tsahi Gozani Rapiscan Laboratories 520Almanor Ave, Sunnyvale, CA

Minerals: Minerals: Building blocks of rocks. Atomic Structure of Matter. Building Blocks of Rocks Chapter 3 Outline

Gamma-Ray coincidence and 60 Co angular correlation

Nuclear Physics Part 1: Nuclear Structure & Reactions

Alpha decay usually occurs in heavy nuclei such as uranium or plutonium, and therefore is a major part of the radioactive fallout from a nuclear

Phys102 Lecture 29, 30, 31 Nuclear Physics and Radioactivity

Radioactivity. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1903 for their work on radioactivity. Henri Becquerel Pierre Curie Marie Curie

Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy - A non-destructive method for material testing -

Minerals. Atoms, Elements, and Chemical Bonding. Definition of a Mineral 2-1

EEE4106Z Radiation Interactions & Detection

Response of a hexagonal NaI(Tl) scintillation probe in the attenuated neutron radiation of 14.1 MeV neutron generator ING-27

LAB 4: Gamma-ray coincidence spectrometry (2018)

Teacher: Mr. gerraputa. Name: Base your answer to the question on the information below. Given the electron dot diagram:

Alpha-Gamma discrimination by Pulse Shape in LaBr 3 :Ce and LaCl 3 :Ce

Neutron and Gamma Ray Imaging for Nuclear Materials Identification

The EURITRACK Project: Status of a Tagged Neutron Inspection System for Cargo Containers

Chapter 33: The Atomic Nucleus and Radioactivity Review questions pg. 658

Lecture Outlines PowerPoint. Chapter 2 Earth Science 11e Tarbuck/Lutgens

GAMMA RAY SPECTROSCOPY

N U C L E O N. Satellite Mission. Present status.

Chapter 2 Notes The Chemistry of Life

The wavefunction ψ for an electron confined to move within a box of linear size L = m, is a standing wave as shown.

A dual scintillator - dual silicon photodiode detector module for intraoperative gamma\beta probe and portable anti-compton spectrometer

Determination of the boron content in polyethylene samples using the reactor Orphée

Neutron Transport Calculations Using Monte-Carlo Methods. Sean Lourette Fairport High School Advisor: Christian Stoeckl

Matter and Minerals Earth: Chapter Pearson Education, Inc.

Neutron activation analysis. Contents. Introduction

Annax-I. Investigation of multi-nucleon transfer reactions in

Neutron Detection. n interactions with matter n detection High/low energy n detectors

Electron probe microanalysis - Electron microprobe analysis EPMA (EMPA) What s EPMA all about? What can you learn?

Medical Neutron Science

Complete the table by ticking one box in each row to identify the appropriate isotope. The first row has been completed for you.

Physics Dept. PHY-503-SEMESTER 112 PROJECT. Measurement of Carbon Concentration in Bulk Hydrocarbon Samples

Supplementary Figure 1 Comparison of single quantum emitters on two type of substrates:

UK Patent Application 9 >GB

MoonCal An electromagnetic calorimeter on the lunar surface. R.Battiston, M.T.Brunetti, F. Cervelli, C.Fidani, F.Pilo

Hands on LUNA: Detector Simulations with Geant4

Performance of high pressure Xe/TMA in GEMs for neutron and X-ray detection

Atomic Structure Practice Questions

TIIVISTELMÄRAPORTTI (SUMMARY REPORT)

Investigations on warm dense plasma with PHELIX facility

THE INSTALLATION FOR EXPERIMENTAL NEUTRON SPECTRA RESEARCH IN REACTOR MATERIALS COMPOSITIONS Hliustin D.V. Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow,

Nuclear cross-section measurements at the Manuel Lujan Jr. Neutron Scattering Center. Michal Mocko

Hrant Gulkanyan and Amur Margaryan

Q1 and Q2 Review large CHEMISTRY

STUDY OF NEUTRON IRRADIATION-INDUCED COLOR IN TOPAZ AT THE PULSED REACTOR IBR-2. Abstract

Simulating Gamma-Ray Telescopes in Space Radiation Environments with Geant4: Detector Activation

Properties of the nucleus. 8.2 Nuclear Physics. Isotopes. Stable Nuclei. Size of the nucleus. Size of the nucleus

Fundamental Stellar Parameters. Radiative Transfer. Stellar Atmospheres. Equations of Stellar Structure

Transcription:

DETERMINATION OF ELEMENTAL COMPOSITION OF ROCKS BY TAGGED NEUTRON METHOD V.Yu. Alexakhin 1,2, V.M. Bystritsky 1,2, N.I. Zamyatin 1,2, E.V. Zubarev 1,2, A.V. Krasnoperov 1,2, V.L. Rapatsky 1,2, A.V. Rogachev 1,2, Yu.N. Rogov 1,2, A.B. Sadovsky 1,2, R.A. Salmin 1,2, M.G. Sapozhnikov 1,2, V.M. Slepnev 1,2, S.V. Khabarov 1,2, E.A. Razinkov 1,2, O.G. Tarasov 1,2, E.V. Sklyarov 3,4, A.V. Lavrenchuk 5 1 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research 141980, Dubna, Moscow reg., St. Juliot-Curie 6 2 Neutron Technologies LLS, Russia, 141980, Dubna, Moscow reg., St. Juliot-Curie 6 3 Institute of the Earth s Crust, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Science, Russia,664033, Irkutsk, St. Lermontova 128 4 Far Eastern Federal University, 690950, Vladivostok, Sukhanova, 8 5 Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Science, Russia, 630090, Novosibirsk, ul. Pr. A. Koptyuga 3 The technology for determination of the elemental composition of rocks on the basis of the tagged neutron method is tested in the field conditions. We discuss the results of experimental studies of rock samples irradiated by fast tagged neutrons with energy of 14.1 MeV. The source of the fast neutrons is a portable neutron generator with built-in silicon alpha detector. Characteristic gamma rays resulting from the inelastic interaction of neutrons with nuclei of chemical elements that make up the geological rocks and minerals are registered by gamma detectors based on crystals of BGO. Comparison of the results on the elemental composition of rocks obtained by the tagged neutron method with reference values is discussed. Detectors based on the tagged neutrons method (TNM) [1,2,3] are widely used to detect explosives hidden in various objects of inspection [4,5]. By physical nature of such detectors they are used to determine the relative concentrations of carbon, oxygen and nitrogen. In work [6] it is shown how to use the TNM to search for diamonds in kimberlite ore without destroying it. The aim of this work is the use of TNM to determine the elemental composition of rocks in the field. The method of tagged neutrons is used to analyze the spectra of the characteristic gamma - radiation produced by irradiating the object of investigation by the flow of fast neutrons with energies of 14.1 MeV produced in binary nuclear reaction d+ 3 H 4 He+n. (1) Since the α-particle (nucleus of 4 Не atom) and the neutron fly away in almost opposite directions, it is possible to determine the direction of neutron emission by registration (tagging) α-particles with special detector, which is a matrix of separate sensing elements (pixels). Tagged neutrons entering the object of study, induce inelastic scattering n+a n +A *, A * γ+a, (2) resulting in the excitation of the nucleus which is removed by the emission of gamma rays with an energy spectrum characteristic of each chemical element. Registration of characteristic γ-radiation by γ-detectors is carried in coincidences with the signal from the α-detectors. This makes possible to determine all three coordinates of the point of the sample

from which γ quantum was emitted. The two coordinates are determined by the number of pixel which was hit by the α-particle, and the third coordinate characterizing the distance from the tritium target to the point of emission of γ-quantum is calculated using the time-of-flight technique. The distance from the tritium target to the point of emission of a gamma-ray is defined as a product of time between registration of the α-particle and γ - quantum by the velocity of the neutron with the energy of 14.1 MeV, which is constant and is equal to 5 cm/ns. By measuring the γ-spectrum of a sample consisting of several chemical elements, it is possible to decompose γ-spectrum components and to determine the relative proportion of each element in the sample. In the present paper we discuss the results of the first application of TNM to determine the elemental composition of rocks in the field conditions. The samples of silicate and carbonate rocks taken at Olkhon geodynamic testing ground [7] were used for the tests. The measurements were carried out on geological base Chernorud (Irkutsk State Technical University). The main purpose of the measurements was to check the possibility to perform correct TNM analysis of the elemental composition of rocks from relatively homogeneous groups of indicator elements. So, for the carbonate rocks it is important to separate between calcite marbles (without magnesium), dolomite marbles (with a substantial share of magnesium) and calciphyres (rock with a substantial admixture of silicates and varying ratios of calcium and magnesium). It was interesting to see how well the results of TNM are correlated with the results of petrographic analysis carried out in the field, and how well they correlate with the results of chemical analysis in the laboratory. The measurements were done using a portable detector DVIN-1 [4]. DVIN-1 detector consists of an inspection module which is connected with a cable to the operator s computer. Inspection module has dimensions of 740x510x410 mm and a weight of 40 kg. Inside of the inspection module a neutron source, a gamma detector and data acquisition electronics are placed. Power supply of the inspection module is carried out from 220V network. Power consumption is about 300 Watts. The neutron source used is a portable neutron generator ING-27, produced by VNIIA named after N.L.Duhov (Moscow) with a built-in 9-α-pixel detector. The intensity of the neutron flux generated by the neutron generator (NG) was I = 5 10 7 s -1. Α silicon α detector, which is built-in into NG, has a 3x3 matrix with the size of each element of 10x10 mm 2. The α-detector is positioned at a distance of 62 mm from the tritium target. Preamplifiers of the α-detector signals are mounted on the flange of NG. The detection of γ-rays is carried out by a single detector on the basis of BGO crystal, with a diameter of 76 mm and a thickness of 65 mm. At the γ-line of carbon (Eγ = 4.44 MeV) energy resolution of γ-detector is about 4.4%. The time resolution of α-γ coincidences is 3.3 ns. The measurements took place on Olkhon geodynamic testing ground, based in the site of Chernorud (Irkutsk State Technical University). The size of the samples ranged from 20 to 50 cm, weight from 2 to 6 kg. No sample preparation was performed. The measurement time for each sample was 15 min. Area of survey at the sample was approximately 9x9 cm. It is divided into 9 areas (the number of tagged beams). The elemental composition was determined at the same time in each area. The chemical composition of the samples was determined by the silica analysis in the Analytical Center of the Institute of Earth's Crust (Irkutsk) by standard methods [8]. Gamma-ray spectrum of each sample is resolved into individual components by fitting the sum of its constituent gamma-spectra from the elements Si, Mg, Fe, Al, Ca, C, O. These reference spectra have been measured in advance.

For the analysis in the field conditions samples of three groups of rocks: carbonate rocks (dolomite, calcite marbles and calciphyres, 17 samples), gneisses (23 samples) and amphibolites (7 samples) were presented. The energy spectra of typical samples from selected groups of rocks are shown in Fig.1. Thus the energy spectrum of the irradiated calcite marble sample (elemental composition of CaCO 3 ) is shown in Fig.1a. Characteristic gamma lines of oxygen shown in Fig.1a by dashed lines are clearly visible. Three oxygen peaks dominate at energies E> 5000 kev. The other three peaks are seen at E = 2742, 3089 and 3854 kev. The characteristic spectrum of calcium shows prominent peak at energy E = 3737 kev. The imposition of this line to the peak corresponding to the deexcitation cascade transitions for oxygen nucleus (transition energy E = 3854 kev), creates some blurred structure of non-gaussian shape. The characteristic spectrum of carbon is the simplest - it stands out from only one line at E = 4439 kev and the peak of the leakage of single annihilation gamma ray shifted to 511 kev from the main line. Fig.1. The spectra of gamma-ray radiation from the samples of calcite marble (a), dolomitic marble (b), gneiss (c) and amphibolite (d). The contributions of individual elements of the respective lines are shown. The solid line shows the result of fitting procedure.

These quality features of calcite are also confirmed by quantitative results of determination of the elemental composition. Table 1 lists the mass fractions of the various elements for some samples of calcite marble obtained in the central tagged beam, which covers an area of 3x3 cm at the sample surface. Fig. 1b shows the spectrum of a sample of dolomite marble (elemental composition CaCO 3 x MgCO 3 ). In addition to the characteristic lines of Ca, C and O, which are present on Fig.1a as well, the line of magnesium at 1369 kev is clearly visible. This is reflected in the results of the determination of mass concentrations listed in Table 1. They show the correct presence of four main elements in the dolomitic marble. Mass fraction of magnesium reaches 7-10%. Table 1. Mass fractions of the elements of various species in the samples obtained from the measurements with detector DVIN-1. Sample Si, % Mg, % Fe, % Al, % Ca, % C, % O, % Calcite marbles SE2869 - - - 2.6±1.0 34.9±1.8 13.3±0.6 48.8±1.4 SE2801 - - - - 42.3±1.3 16.1±0.7 41.6±1.2 SE2766 1.0±0.4 - - - 43.6±1.7 13.2±0.6 42.1±1.1 Dolomite marbles SE2789-9.6±0.6-2.5±1.0 27.5±2.2 14.4±0.7 45.3±1.9 SE2871-7.7±0.6 2.1±1.1-25.3±2.0 15.0±0.7 48.8±1.7 SE2842-8.9±0.6-2.0±0.8 28.3±2.1 15.9±0.8 44.6±1.7 Calciphyres SE2841 3.9±0.9 - - - 40.2±2.7 14.0±0.8 39.9±2.0 SE2803 2.9±1.0 - - 2.2±1.4 39.6±2.5 13.9±0.8 41.4±2.0 SE2794 3.0±0.7 - - - 43.7±1.2 14.2±0.6 38.5±0.9 Gneisses SE2840 26.9±1.5 6.7±0.7-16.4±1.7 6.8±2.4-42.4±1.9 SE2870 33.1±2.3 2.8±0.8-13.4±2.2-1.2±0.8 47.1±3.0 SE2786 32.1±1.8 1.5±0.6 4.7±1.4 11.5±1.6 6.5±2.2-43.3±1.9 Amphibolites SE2843 22.9±1.9 6.0±0.9 10.3±2.1 7.8±2.0 9.8±4.7-42.6±3.0 SE2850 17.6±1.6 4.1±0.7 9.9±1.6 11.5±1.7 15.3±2.8-41.6±2.7 SE2816 21.4±1.6 4.7±0.7 11.1±1.7 10.7±1.7 12.3±2.7 0.8±0.60.8±0.6 39.0±2.3 Calciphyres consist from calcite or dolomite with an admixture of silicate materials. The amount of this impurity is small and amounts to 3-4% (see Table 1). Fig. 1c shows the spectrum of a typical sample of gneiss. The spectrum shows no carbon peak at 4.44 MeV. There is also the contribution of calcium. This corresponds to the elemental composition of gneisses, which makes a major contribution of SiO 2 silica and alumina Al 2 O 3. The results of determination of the mass fractions of the elements listed in Table 1 are fully consistent with this pattern. Fig. 1d shows the spectrum of a sample of amphibolite. There is no line of carbon visible, at the same time the strong signal from the silicon and the peaks of aluminum and magnesium are present. This is consistent with the elemental composition of amphibolite consisting mainly of silicates and aluminosilicates, magnesium, iron and calcium. Data for

elemental composition of some samples of amphibolite according to results obtained using DVIN-1 detector are shown in Table 1. The spectra shown in Fig. 1, demonstrate the possibility of TNM to determine the key rock-forming elements - C, O, Si, Mg, Al, Fe, Ca. Earlier, in works [4-5] the use of TNM was limited to determination of concentrations of carbon, nitrogen and oxygen elements only. Among these elements the largest cross section for excitation by neutrons 14.1 MeV is a line of carbon 4439 kev for which the excitation cross section is 210 mb. For comparison, the cross section of 1779 kev line of silicon is 400 mb, and 1369 kev line of magnesium has a cross-section of 425 mb. Individual lines of iron, calcium and aluminum also have significant cross sections of excitation, which makes determination of their concentrations possible as well. The main result of the tests is that the method of tagged neutrons correctly reproduces main characteristics of the studied species. Measurement with the TNM correctly reproduced elemental composition of calcite, dolomite and marble calciphyres (marbles with a mixture of silicate minerals), in calcite marbles it observed minor content of Mg and Si, in dolomitic marbles it showed significantly reduced amount of Ca and significant concentrations of Mg, in calciphyres it found increased content of Si. For the amphibolites the Si content was estimated to be around 18-20%, increased concentrations of Fe, Mg, Ca were recorded, which is characteristic of basic rocks. In gneiss silicon content is higher than in amphibolite (25-30% Si) with very low concentrations of Ca and Mg. TNM results correctly showed no carbon presence in both groups of silicate rocks. Thus, the results of measurements in the field have shown that the TNM based detectors can be successfully used for determination the Si, Al, Fe, Mg, Ca, C concentrations in rocks. However, it should be emphasized that the method is not an alternative to traditional methods of analysis, and can be effectively used, if necessary, as express determination of the composition of rocks. The use of TNM detectors in the field allows to get the result after 15-20 minutes of exposure. The rapid analysis of the composition of rocks is most demanded during determining of the position of mining (quarries, mines, tunnels) on existing and explored mineral deposits. REFERENCES [1] Hawkins P. O., Sutton R. W. [Compact pulsed generator of fast neutrons], Rev. Sci. Instr., v. 31, 1960, p. 241. [2] Ussery L. E., Hollas C. L. [Design and Development of the Associated-Particle Three-Dimentional Imaging Technique], Rep. LA-12847-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 1994. [3] Rhodes E., DeVolpi A., Dickerman C. E., Peters C. W. [APSTNG: radiation interrogation for verification of chemical and nuclear weapons], IEEE Trans. Nucl. Science, 1992, v. 39, pp. 1041 1045. Edgar A. Rhodes, Charles E. Dickerman, Charles W. Peters [Associated-particle sealed-tube neutron probe for characterization of materials] The international society for optics and photonics [Proc. SPIE, Substance Detection Systems], 1994, v. 2092, p. 288. doi:10.1117/12.171249. [4] Bystritsky V. M. et al. [DViN - stationary setup for identification of explosives]. Physics of Particles and Atomic Nuclei, Letters, 2008, v. 5, p. 441. [5] Bystritsky V. M. et al. [Stationary Setup for Identifying Explosives Using the Tagged Neutron Method], Physics of Particles and Atomic Nuclei, Letters, 2013, v. 5, p. 722.

[6] Aleksakhin V.Yu. et al.[ Detection of diamonds in kimberlite by the tagged neutron method] Nuclear Instruments and Methods, A 785 (2015) 9. [7] Fedorovsky V.S., Sklyarov Е.V. [The Olkhon geodynamic proving ground (Lake Baikal): high resolution satellite data and geological maps of new generation], Geodynamics & Tectonophysics, 2010, v. 1, 4, pp. 331 418. (in Russian). [8] Riashchenko T. G., Ukhova N. N. Khimicheskii sostav dispersnykh gruntov: vozmozhnosti i prognozy (iug Vostochnoi Sibiri). [The chemical composition of dispersed ground: Opportunities and Forecasts (south of Eastern Siberia)], Irkutsk, Institute of the Earth s Crust, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Science, 2008, p. 131. (in Russian).