Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements

Similar documents
Cone angle control of the interaction of magnetic clouds with the Earth's bow shock

A new interpretation of Weimer et al. s solar wind propagation delay technique

Substorm-associated effects in the variations of low energy electron fluxes in the inner magnetosphere: Does the substorm s strength matter?

Low energy electron radiation environment for extreme events

Solar wind spatial scales in and comparisons of hourly Wind and ACE plasma and magnetic field data

The January 10{11, 1997 magnetic cloud: Multipoint. measurements. J. Safrankova 1,Z.Nemecek 1,L.Prech 1, G. Zastenker 2, K.I.

Response of the Earth s magnetosphere and ionosphere to the small-scale magnetic flux rope in solar wind by the MHD simulation

MSSL. Magnetotail Science with Double Star and Cluster

Ion heating during geomagnetic storms measured using energetic neutral atom imaging. Amy Keesee

Why Study Magnetic Reconnection?

Cluster observations of sudden impulses in the magnetotail caused by interplanetary shocks and pressure increases

Correlation length of large-scale solar wind velocity fluctuations measured tangent to the Earth s orbit: First results from Stereo

The Structure of the Magnetosphere

CHAPTER 2 DATA. 2.1 Data Used

The first super geomagnetic storm of solar cycle 24: The St. Patrick day (17 March 2015) event

Electromagnetic Fields Inside the Magnetoshpere. Outline

A comparison of IMP 8 observed bow shock positions with model predictions

The Dependence of the Magnetic Field Near the Subsolar Magnetopause on IMF in Accordance with THEMIS Data

Storm-time convection electric field in the near-earth plasma sheet

Dynamics of the Jovian magnetosphere for northward interplanetary magnetic field (IMF)

Simultaneous Geotail and Wind observations of reconnection at the subsolar and tail flank magnetopause

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 107, NO. A12, 1477, doi: /2001ja007546, 2002

DYNAMICS OF THE EARTH S MAGNETOSPHERE

PC index as a standard of magnetospheric disturbances in the auroral zone

CLUSTER OBSERVATIONS AND GLOBAL SIMULATION OF THE COLD DENSE PLASMA SHEET DURING NORTHWARD IMF

Plasma depletion layer: its dependence on solar wind conditions and the Earth dipole tilt

Structures in the Magnetosphere 2. Hover the curser over a point on the image. The coordinates and value at that point should appear.

Downstream structures of interplanetary fast shocks associated with coronal mass ejections

EMPIRICAL models use historical databases to establish. Probabilistic Forecasting of the 3-h ap Index

Observations of an interplanetary slow shock associated with magnetic cloud boundary layer

Unanswered questions regarding solar wind - magnetosphere interaction

cos 6 λ m sin 2 λ m Mirror Point latitude Equatorial Pitch Angle Figure 5.1: Mirror point latitude as function of equatorial pitch angle.

Temporal evolution of the transpolar potential after a sharp enhancement in solar wind dynamic pressure

Turbulent transport and evolution of kappa distribution in the plasma sheet

Reconnection at the dayside magnetopause: Comparisons of global MHD simulation results with Cluster and Double Star observations

Advanced modeling of low energy electrons responsible for surface charging

Solar wind structure suggested by bimodal correlations of solar wind speed and density between the spacecraft SOHO and Wind

Relation of substorm disturbances triggered by abrupt solar-wind changes to physics of plasma sheet transport

3-2 Prediction of the Dst Index from Solar Wind Parameters by a Neural Network Method

Stability of the High-Latitude Reconnection Site for Steady. Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center, Palo Alto, CA

Effect of CME Events of Geomagnetic Field at Indian Station Alibag and Pondicherry

, B z. ) Polarity and Statistical Analysis of Solar Wind Parameters during the Magnetic Storm Period

Ring current formation influenced by solar wind substorm conditions

Global modeling of the magnetosphere in terms of paraboloid model of magnetospheric magnetic field

Morphology of the ring current derived from magnetic field observations

Plasma depletion layer: the role of the slow mode waves

SPACE WEATHER, VOL. 8, S06005, doi: /2009sw000542, 2010

Solar&wind+magnetosphere&coupling&via&magnetic&reconnection&likely&becomes& less&efficient&the&further&a&planetary&magnetosphere&is&from&the&sun& &

Response of morning auroras and cosmic noise absorption to the negative solar wind pressure pulse: A case study

Geosynchronous magnetic field response to solar wind dynamic pressure pulse

Time Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm

ROTATIONAL ASYMMETRY OF EARTH S BOW SHOCK

Remote sensing of magnetospheric processes: Lesson 1: Configura7on of the magnetosphere

MAGNETIC STORM EFFECTS IN THE ATMOSPHERIC ELECTRIC FIELD VARIATIONS

Proton cyclotron waves at Mars and Venus

Effect of solar wind pressure enhancements on storm time ring current asymmetry

CROSS POLAR MAGNETOSPHERIC PLASMA DRIFT AS OBSERVED BY CLUSTER EDI: STATISTICAL RESULTS

Three-dimensional multi-fluid simulations of Pluto s magnetosphere: A comparison to 3D hybrid simulations

26. Non-linear effects in plasma

Cluster observations of reconnection due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the dawnside magnetospheric flank

STRUCTURE OF A MAGNETIC DECREASE OBSERVED

Specification of electron radiation environment at GEO and MEO for surface charging estimates

Observation of Intense Poynting Flux in the Dayside Cusp Region during Ion Outflows

РС INDEX AS INDICATOR OF THE SOLAR WIND ENERGY ENTERED INTO THE MAGNETOSPHERE: RELATION TO INTERPLANETARY ELECTRIC FIELD AND MAGNETIC DISTURBANCES

A modelling approach to infer the solar wind plasma parameters upstream of Mercury from magnetic field observations

A stochastic sea: The source of plasma sheet boundary layer ion structures observed by Cluster

Interactions of the heliospheric current and plasma sheets with the bow shock: Cluster and Polar observations in the magnetosheath

Sharp boundaries of small- and middle-scale solar wind structures

EFFECT OF SOLAR AND INTERPLANETARY DISTURBANCES ON SPACE WEATHER

Numerical Simulation of Jovian and Kronian Magnetospheric Configuration

PROPAGATION AND EVOLUTION OF ICMES IN THE SOLAR WIND

What determines when and where reconnection begins

The importance of solar wind magnetic. the upcoming Sunjammer solar sail. field observations & mission

Understanding storm-time ring current development through data-model comparisons of a moderate storm

1 Introduction. Cambridge University Press Physics of Space Plasma Activity Karl Schindler Excerpt More information

Intro to magnetosphere (Chap. 8) Schematic of Bow Shock and Foreshock. Flow around planetary magnetic field obstacle. Homework #3 posted

Polar Cap (PC) Index

Low energy electrons at MEO during observed surface charging events

Solar and Interplanetary Disturbances causing Moderate Geomagnetic Storms

Solar cycle effect on geomagnetic storms caused by interplanetary magnetic clouds

Estimates of the Suprathermal O + outflow characteristic energy and relative location in the auroral oval

The Locations and Shapes of Jupiter s Bow Shock and Magnetopause

Features of energetic particle radial profiles inferred from geosynchronous responses to solar wind dynamic pressure enhancements

The Dynamic Magnetosphere. Ioannis A. Daglis. National Observatory of Athens, Greece

Questions not covered in this document? Contact Dr. Jerry Goldstein at

Statistical study of O + transport from the cusp to the lobes with Cluster CODIF data

Auroral Disturbances During the January 10, 1997 Magnetic Storm

Cluster observations of hot flow anomalies

Locations of chorus emissions observed by the Polar Plasma Wave Instrument

Solutions to Merav Opher (2010) Problems

Generated a summary plot of plasma/ field/energetic particle observations in the vicinity of each shock.

Low energy electrons in the inner Earth s magnetosphere

Plasma interaction at Io and Europa

Planetary Magnetospheres: Homework Problems

First observations of foreshock bubbles upstream of Earth s bow shock: Characteristics and comparisons to HFAs

Interplanetary Conditions. L. R. Lyons. Department of Atmospheric Sciences. University of California, Los Angeles. Los Angeles, CA

Statistical study of the location and size of the electron edge of the Low-Latitude Boundary Layer as observed by Cluster at mid-altitudes

The Magnetic Sun. CESAR s Booklet

arxiv: v1 [physics.space-ph] 19 Jul 2018

Magnetosphere-Ionosphere-Thermosphere Coupling During Storms and Substorms

Transcription:

Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements

The Approach Magnetospheric studies usually are based on a single solar wind monitor. We propagate the solar wind from the observation point (usually the L1 point) to Earth by using the observed velocity and assuming that there are no changes along the way. We assume that the solar wind is homogeneous across the width of the magnetosphere.

Characterizing the Solar Wind Parcels that Interact with the Earth It has been recognized for a long time that simple propagation of the solar wind from a distant monitor to the Earth was flawed. How well the IMF observed upstream actually represents the solar wind that interacts with the Earth depends on the separation of the spacecraft perpendicular to the Sun-Earth line. Crooker et al., [1982] good correlation for d <50R E if the variance in the solar wind is large good correlation for d <20R E if the variance is small. Collier et al., [1998; 2000] have quantified the percentage of time two monitors observed good correlation as a function of d. A good correlation was >80%.

Characterizing the Solar Wind Parcels that Interact with the Earth 2 % time = 32% ( d 10R ) where L =41R E. The Collier formula indicates at good correlations are found only 25% of the time for spacecraft with d ~30R E. Richardson and Paularena [2001] found evidence for scale lengths perpendicular to the flow of 45R E the IMF, 70R E for the speed and 100R E for the density. The radial scale length is 400R E. The entire potential difference across the magnetosphere only requires 3-4R E [Burke et al., 1999]. Since this is much smaller than the typical IMF scale length perhaps transverse variations in the solar wind are not too important for the magnetosphere. L E

Propagating the Solar Wind Weimer et al., in a series of papers suggested that by calculating a phase front the estimate of the time to propagate from L1 to the Earth could be improved. Two methods have been used over the past couple of years. MVAB-0 calculated the minimum variance direction constrained such that the average field along the minimum variance direction is zero. (Haaland et al., [2006]; and an equivalent approach by Bargatze et al., [2005]) For a set of magnetic field meaurements: The eigenvectors of M give the maximum, intermediate and minimum ij = Bi B j Bi B j variation of the field components. Cross product take the vector cross product of average magnetic field vectors upstream and downstream of the discontinuity.

Calculating the Phase Fronts Red give phase fronts calculate from MVAB-0 and blue uses the cross product method. (Weimer and King, 2008)

Pick the Best Method at Each Time Where there is disagreement use the method closest to the trend.

Predicted Lags Top convection delay; bottom delay using combined method. Separation (227.3R E, 5.4R E, 14.4R E )

Spacecraft Orbits on May 24, 2000 (Ashour-Abdalla, 2008) Four solar wind monitors were available throughout most of the interval. ACE was at the L1 point at x=220r E, Y=25 R E and Z=- 20R E Wind was moving toward the Earth about 60R E upstream, at noon and in the equator. DAWN IMP-8 was duskward of noon, about 30R E upstream and 20R E below the ecliptic. Geotail was at noon and crossed the bow shock during the interval. DUSK

ACE Solar Wind Observations During the May 23-24, 2000 Magnetic Storm A magnetic cloud passed the Earth on May 23-24, 2000. The solar wind dynamic pressure exceeded 30nPa. A moderate storm (Dst~-150nT) resulted. We have divided our analysis into two intervals 2200UT May 23 to 0600UT May 24. The main body of the cloud passed the Earth. 0900UT to 1500UT May 24. The magnetosphere was engulfed in the wake of the cloud.

Solar Wind and IMF Observations from Wind, ACE and IMP-8 First Interval, May 23 and 24, 2000

Solar Wind and IMF Observations from Wind, ACE and IMP-8 Second Interval, May 24, 2000

A Digression on Correlation The cross correlation of two time series a and b is defined by c k 1 + M 1 a pbk + p p where k is the lag, N and M are the lengths of the time series. The sum is over all N+M+1 possible products. = An autocorrelation is a cross correlation of a time sequence with itself. φ k = The correlation coefficient is equal to the cross correlation normalized to give one when the two time series are identical (perfectly correlated). ψ k = ψ k is 1 for perfect correlation and -1 for anticorrelation. N 1 2N 1 p a pa p a a p pbk + p p b a b p p p p k + p

Cross Correlation Between ACE and Wind B Z The ACE data have been shifted 31:32 minutes with respect to Wind. The cross correlation is >.95 with <2min additional shift. The small shift may be do to changes in solar wind velocity between the two spacecraft.

Cross Correlation Between ACE and Wind B Z Second Interval. The cross correlation is <0.7 with no dominant peak. Delays of 2 hours are as good as zero. The differences are not in the propagation scheme.

Peak Cross Correlations in IMF Bz Between ACE, Wind and IMP-8 Observations Peak cross correlations were calculated over 2 hour running intervals. Cross correlations are larger during the first interval. Cross correlations in first interval improved with averaged data. Best cross correlations occur between IMP-8 and Wind Cross correlations during the second interval are not improved by averaging. Similar results were found with up to 30 minute averages. No Smoothing Ten Minute Running Averages

Peak Cross-correlations in Dynamic Pressure Between IMP-8, ACE, and Wind Observations Low cross-correlations for all three combinations when the data with no smoothing are used. In general the IMP-8 and Wind observations agree best. Averaging improves the cross-correlations for the first interval (especially IMP-8 and Wind early during the large pressure increase). The cross-correlations during the pressure increase in the second interval become worse. No Smoothing Ten Minute Running Average

The magnetosphere is a complex time dependent threedimensional structure. The equator is a twisted surface located above the GSE equator on the dawn side and below it on the dusk side. The cross section varies with X and time. It s cross section depends on the history of the solar wind and the resulting dynamics. Needed to develop a way to organize the results. Organizing the Results

The plasma sheet is the maximum pressure surface. The color spectrogram gives the north-south component of B. The white arrows show the flow. The contours give the thermal pressure. Displaying the Results