BI-LAYER PROTECTION AGAINST SCATTER RADIATION

Similar documents
Chapter 30 X Rays GOALS. When you have mastered the material in this chapter, you will be able to:

Basic physics Questions

For the next several lectures, we will be looking at specific photon interactions with matter. In today s lecture, we begin with the photoelectric

Zero-Gravity. The suspended radiation protection system

Measurements with the new PHE Neutron Survey Instrument

Calibration of the GNU and HSREM neutron survey instruments

Rad T 290 Worksheet 2

X-ray Interaction with Matter

Name: COMBINED SCIENCE Topics 4, 5 & 6 LEARNING OUTCOMES. Maintain a record of your progress Use the booklet to guide revision

We have seen how the Brems and Characteristic interactions work when electrons are accelerated by kilovolts and the electrons impact on the target

M [scale units/s] of the system

The detector and counter are used in an experiment to show that a radioactive source gives out alpha and beta radiation only.

Chemical Engineering 412

s p E C A L s E c T O N

Radiation Safety. PIXE PAN 2008 Ed Stech University of Notre Dame

Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (CEA/LIST/LNHB), France (2) ENEA-Radiation Protection Institute, Bologna, Italy (3)

GLOSSARY OF BASIC RADIATION PROTECTION TERMINOLOGY

NORM and TENORM: Occurrence, Characterizing, Handling and Disposal

CHARGED PARTICLE INTERACTIONS

5 Atomic Physics. 1 of the isotope remains. 1 minute, 4. Atomic Physics. 1. Radioactivity 2. The nuclear atom

Radiation Awareness Training. Stephen Price Office of Research Safety

Chemistry Review Unit 1 Study Guide

UNIFORM DISTRIBUTIONS The allows us to see two very important properties: 1. The under the of a distribution is equal. (or frequency), so some

9 Nuclear decay Answers to exam practice questions

Radiation shielding materials and radiation scatter effects for interventional radiology (IR) physicians

Initial Certification

P7 Radioactivity. Student Book answers. P7.1 Atoms and radiation. Question Answer Marks Guidance

Atomic Structure and Radioactivity

Health Physics Services Ltd

Shell Atomic Model and Energy Levels

Implementing the ISO Reference Radiations at a Brazilian Calibration Laboratory

Radiation Protection & Radiation Therapy

Available online at ScienceDirect. Physics Procedia 69 (2015 )

The greater the frequency the greater the energy. Thus ordering in increasing frequency is equivalent to ordering in increasing energy;

Radioactivity APPARATUS INTRODUCTION PROCEDURE

Radiation Quantities and Units

PHYSICS B (ADVANCED PHYSICS) 2864/01 Field and Particle Pictures

Radioactivity Questions NAT 5

Atomic and nuclear physics

2) Estimate your annual radiation dose from background radiation.

11/23/2014 RADIATION AND DOSE MEASUREMENTS. Units of Radioactivity

This is the last of our four introductory lectures. We still have some loose ends, and in today s lecture, we will try to tie up some of these loose

CHAPTER 2 RADIATION INTERACTIONS WITH MATTER HDR 112 RADIATION BIOLOGY AND RADIATION PROTECTION MR KAMARUL AMIN BIN ABDULLAH

Nuclear Physics Part 2A: Radioactive Decays

Multi-element process analyzer

Physics 23 Fall 1989 Lab 5 - The Interaction of Gamma Rays with Matter

ESTIMATION OF 90 SCATTERING COEFFICIENT IN THE SHIELDING CALCULATION OF DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EQUIPMENT

ELEG 479 Lecture #6. Mark Mirotznik, Ph.D. Associate Professor The University of Delaware

Outline. Radiation Interactions. Spurs, Blobs and Short Tracks. Introduction. Radiation Interactions 1

Overview: In this experiment we will study the decay of a radioactive nucleus, Cesium. Figure 1: The Decay Modes of Cesium 137

X-RAY SPECTRA. Theory:

CHEMISTRY 170. Radioisotopes

Ba (Z = 56) W (Z = 74) preferred target Mo (Z = 42) Pb (Z = 82) Pd (Z = 64)

Chapter 24 Photonics Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5

Chapter 16 Basic Precautions

This watermark does not appear in the registered version - Laser- Tissue Interaction

UNIT 10 RADIOACTIVITY AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY

X-ray induced singlet oxygen generation by. nanoparticle-photosensitizer conjugates for. photodynamic therapy: determination of singlet

In today s lecture, we want to see what happens when we hit the target.

Higher -o-o-o- Past Paper questions o-o-o- 3.6 Radiation

INTRODUCTION TO IONIZING RADIATION (Attix Chapter 1 p. 1-5)

Training program for x-ray inspection film (RT)

INAYA MEDICAL COLLEGE (IMC) RAD LECTURE 1 RADIATION PHYSICS DR. MOHAMMED MOSTAFA EMAM

Brand Protection and Anti-counterfeiting Technology. Presented by: Michael Impastato ext. 338

UNIT 10 RADIOACTIVITY AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY

LIGHT WAVES AND PARTICLES

4.4 Atomic structure Notes

Standardless Analysis by XRF but I don t know what s in my sample!! Dr Colin Slater Applications Scientist, XRF Bruker UK Limited

M1. (a) (i) cannot penetrate aluminium allow can only pass through air / paper too weak is neutral 1

1. Which of the following statements is true about Bremsstrahlung and Characteristic Radiation?

Working Correctly & Safely with Radiation. Talia Tzahor Radiation safety officer Tel:

Unit 6 Modern Physics

Neutron Interactions Part I. Rebecca M. Howell, Ph.D. Radiation Physics Y2.5321

Atomic and nuclear physics

CHEMISTRY 130 General Chemistry I. Radioisotopes

ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM

How many protons are there in the nucleus of the atom?... What is the mass number of the atom?... (Total 2 marks)

Physics of Radiotherapy. Lecture II: Interaction of Ionizing Radiation With Matter

X-ray absorption. 4. Prove that / = f(z 3.12 ) applies.

Radionuclide Imaging MII Positron Emission Tomography (PET)

Lecture Outlines Chapter 32. Physics, 3 rd Edition James S. Walker

Lab NUC. Determination of Half-Life with a Geiger-Müller Counter

CHAPTER 12 TEST REVIEW

Atomic and nuclear physics

Welcome back to PHY 3305

Regulatory Considerations in the Licensing of a Mobile Backscatter X-ray Device used in Security Screening

XUV 773: X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis of Gemstones

progressive electromagnetic wave

International Journal of Computing and Business Research (IJCBR) ISSN (Online) : APPLICATION OF GIS IN HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT

PHYS 3650L - Modern Physics Laboratory

1. What would be the dose rate of two curies of 60Co with combined energies of 2500 kev given off 100% of the time?

Calibration of a pencil ionization chamber with and without preamplifier

Some nuclei are unstable Become stable by ejecting excess energy and often a particle in the process Types of radiation particle - particle

STANDARD WATER PHANTOM BACKSCATTER FACTORS FOR MEDIUM ENERGY X-RAYS

Unit 6 Nuclear Radiation Parent Guide. What is radioactivity and why are things radioactive?

1Meherun Nahar, Sazzad, 3Abdus Sattar Mollah and 4Mir Mohammad Akramuzzaman Correspondence Address INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS Mathematical

S8 TIGER Series 2 for ASTM D 6443

CHEMICAL-RESISTANT BOOTS COMFORT & SAFETY SOLUTIONS PROTECTION AND COMFORT YOU DESERVE

INTERACTIONS OF RADIATION WITH MATTER

H e a l t h P h y s i c s S e r v i c e s L t d

Transcription:

BI-LAYER PROTECTION AGAINST SCATTER RADIATION

An all new innovation in radiation protection core material THE STORY Kiarmor is an all new innovation in radiation protection core material, the combination of two powerful radiation blocking materials into a single homogeneous sheet. Sb Antimony 51 (Low atomic weight element) Bi Bismuth 83 (High atomic weight element) When viewed outside the apron, Kiarmor is Red on the bottom and consists of bismuth and Blue on the top and consists of antimony. Both elements are well known for their radiation protective qualities, but when combined in this precise process and configuration they form a powerful barrier and virtually eliminate absorbed dose to the apron wearer. Lead has long been the standard for radiation protection, simply put it does a great job and it s relatively inexpensive and plentiful. But, there s health problems associated with lead and it s rather heavy so in recent years many companies, (Infab included) have developed lighter weight reduced lead and lead free products. Generally speaking these materials perform fairly well in the narrow direct beam where they are routinely tested. BUT..Infab has long been concerned about real world conditions, the ones that doctors, technicians and X-ray personnel are subjected to and that s not direct beam, it s scatter radiation!! DANGERS OF SCATTER RADIATION Scatter radiation is the dangerous stuff, it s the lower energy radiation and it doesn t pass through your body it s absorbed into it. Why then is every single test for lead equivalency and radiation protection performed under the direct beam and not just the regular direct beam but the narrow direct beam that has NOTHING to do with real world conditions? The answer is because that test is easy and inexpensive to perform!!

Testing and what it means for KIARMOR There are three test procedures for radiation protection material that are universally recognized. ASTM which is widely used in the USA and nowhere else, IEC 61331-1 which is widely used throughout the rest of the world and DIN which is the only standard allowed in Germany and the toughest of them all to meet or exceed. Kiarmor protects every bit as well as pure lead in the direct beam AND passes every single one of the test standards mentioned above BUT it does something better than any other material available in the world today, it drastically reduces the absorbed dose from scatter radiation, the very type of harmful radiation you are exposed to on a daily basis while you work. We aren t talking about a little bit better either. The Leeds University tests prove that Kiarmor is 40% more effective than other non lead or reduced lead materials and 20% better than lead materials at stopping the absorbed dose. These were tests performed in real world situations like the ones you face every day and against those familiar brands that you know about, Xenolite, Bar-Ray and Mavig. And they beat them hands down and by that large of a margin. WHY GO WITH KIARMOR If you re concerned about the harmful effects of scatter radiation (and you should be) then you need to know there s something better and it s available right now. Kiarmor, a joint venture product between Kemmetech, Kent, England the world leader in radiation protection materials and Infab Corporation, the leading protective garment manufacturer and available now exclusively from Infab and our many distribution partners worldwide. THE KIARMOR CHALLENGE There is no other product in the world that is like KIARMOR or does what it does. It is the technically certified lightest weight, highest protection level material you can buy, anywhere. Do not be fooled by imitators or competitors, ask them for their scientific testing and proof and scrutinize it closely before you make any decision to purchase.

Step by Step Guide to Understanding kv, kev and Efficiency of Kiarmor Bi-layer in Comparison to Lead-free or Composite Materials 1. kv is the voltage (Kilovolts = 1000s of volts) across the X-ray lamp that generates the kev (Kilo Electron Volts) spectrum (wavelength bandwidth) of X-ray energy for the main beam. (Not to be confused with kev). 2. The kev X-ray spectrum ranges from approximately 15keV to the maximum level of kv used in the X-ray lamp excitation. In other words, if you use 100kV (typical standard X-ray) across the X-ray lamp, the kev spectrum will range from approximately 15keV to 100keV. If you use 60kV (typical fluoroscope) the kev spectrum will range from approximately 15keV to 60keV. Fig 1 - Typical kev Spectrum Generated from 100kV Main Beam Transmission kev Spectrum at 100kV Fig 2 - Typical kev Spectrum Generated from 60kV Main Beam Transmission kev Spectrum at 100kV Photon Count Photon Count 10 20 30 40 50 kev 60 70 80 901 00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 kev Note: The photon count on the Y axis is dependent on current/time selected, so no real scale applied.

KIARMOR BI-LAYER COMPARISON 3. Scatter radiation is typically 1% of the main beam. Furthermore, the higher kev energies in the main beam do not scatter as much as they pass through the patient, or object, being X-rayed, whilst the lower energies scatter more easily because they do not have the penetrating power. Therefore, if you look at the resulting kev spectrum for the scatter radiation, the top end of the kev spectrum is reduced. Typically, if you generated the main beam using 100kV on the lamp, the main beam energy, in terms of kev, will range from approximately 15keV to 100keV (Fig 1) and the scatter radiation will range from approximately 15keV to just over 60keV (Fig 3). If you generated the main beam using 60kV across the lamp, the main beam energy, in terms of kev, will range from approximately 15keV to 60keV (Fig 2) and the scatter radiation will range from approximately 15keV to just over 45keV (Fig 4). Fig 3 - Typical Resultant kev Spectrum for Scatter Radiation for Main Beam Generated at 100kV Fig 4 - Typical Resultant kev Spectrum for Scatter Radiation for Main Beam Generated at 60kV Scatter Radiation kev Spectrum from Main Beam Generated at 100kV Scatter Radiation kev Spectrum from Main Beam Generated at 60kV Photon Count Photon Count 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 kev 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 kev Note: The kev scale of the Y axis (Photon Count) would be approximately a 50th of the graphs for the main beam. 4. Absorbed dose is created from radiation that does not pass through the body. That is the lower ranges of kev, typically 15keV to approximately 45keV. Scatter radiation is primarily made up of this range of kev and the core material needs to be at its most efficient and effective in this range to be truly effective in protecting the user. 5. Given the principles above, and taking the example of fluoroscopy, which typically uses between 60kV to 70kV across the lamp to generate the X-rays, the main beam will have kev energies from 15keV to approximately 65keV. However, the scatter radiation will have energies from 15keV to approximately 45keV. This means that the vast majority of the radiation is in the absorbed dose range as it lacks the penetrating power and will stay in the body of the recipient.

KIARMOR BI-LAYER COMPARISON 6. Current Lead-free materials use lower weight atomic elements, for example, Antimony, Tin, Barium etc., to provide lighter materials that are just able to pass current test standards such as ASTM and IEC 61331-1. However, these elements have K-edges in the critical area of kev in terms of absorbed dose, which is not picked up by the test standards. Higher atomic weight elements, such as Lead or Bismuth, have K-edges beyond the kev spectrum for typical scatter radiation and do not have the same issue. K-edges create fluorescence and a break-down of the efficiency of these elements in terms of absorbing photon energy from an X-ray source, or the derived scatter radiation. In fact, these K-edges can actually increase the dose to the wearer of an X-ray protection apron as the fluorescence causes an increase in photon energy to the wearer of an X-ray protection apron made from these lower atomic weight elements (Fig 5). The same applies to materials using a composite (mixture) of a higher and lower atomic weight element, for example, Bismuth/Antimony, or a Lead composite material. That this occurs right next to the wearer is the worst case scenario in terms of protection against absorbed dose. Fig 5 - Attenuation Properties of Typical Lead-free Materials and Composites in Scatter Radiation Main Beam Transmission at 60kV Scatter Radiation Attenuation of kev Spectrum by Pb, Sb & Ba Vinyl Photon Count Lead Antimony Barium Area of Concern - Abosrbed Dose 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 kev

KIARMOR BI-LAYER COMPARISON 7. By arranging Lead-free materials as a Bi-layer, with a lower atomic weight element at the top (for example, Antimony) and a higher atomic weight element at the bottom (for example, Bismuth), the K-edge effect is nullified and the additional photons created by the fluorescence of the lower atomic weight element is absorbed by the higher atomic weight element (Fig 6). Fig 6 - Attenuation Properties of a Bi-layer Lead-free Material (Bismuth/Antimony) in scatter radiation Scatter Radiation kev Spectrum from Main Beam at 60kV Resulting Attenuation for Pb & Kiarmor Bi-Layer Lead Kiarmor Bi-Layer Photon Count Area of Concern - Abosrbed Dose 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 kev Independent testing has shown that this Bi-layer configuration is 20% more effective than Lead and 40% more effective than Lead-free materials and composites in terms of absorbed dose. Kiarmor Bi-layer passes all current and future standards, IEC 61331-1, ASTM and DIN 6857-1 (specifically designed for Lead-free materials with geometry and beam conditions designed to capture the K-edge and fluorescence).

LEEDS UNIVERSITY SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Full 10 Page Preliminary Report available online at Infabcorp.com/leeds Kemmetech Bi-layer Project Supplementary Report : Bismuth and Antimony Samples Dr. Amanda Fender and Dr. David Brettle, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust 5th October 2012 This report contains material that is intended for Kemmetech only and is subject to the terms of the nondisclosure agreement that is in place between Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and Kemmetech. These are preliminary results and may be altered after further scrutiny of the experimental data. Introduction This work was performed as part of a collaborative project between Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (LTHT) and Kemmetech. The aim of the project is to compare the level of protection from radiation provided by a range of composite materials and bi-layers formed of the two constituent materials of the composite materials. The same samples will be tested by LTHT and the National Physical Laboratory (NPL). At the NPL, the materials will be tested in the primary radiation beam, as described by IEC 6331-1. At LTHT, the samples will be tested in real world conditions, in a typical fluoroscopy scatter beam that would be encountered by an interventionalist or radiographer during fluoroscopy guided procedures. Spectral and air kerma rate measurements will be made at LTHT, which will enable the relative risk of wearing an apron made of each sample tested to be determined. This brief report presents some supplementary information to compliment the preliminary report for the first set of samples in this project. Results Effective dose and skin dose estimations Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the H*(10) (effective dose estimate) and H (0.07) (skin dose estimation) for each of the bismuth and antimony samples relative to the value that would be achieved with a 0.25 mm Pb foil.

LEEDS UNIVERSITY SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT H*(10)/ H*(10) for 0.25 mm Pb 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 RxBx BxRx R1 & B7 R2 & B6 R3 & B5 R4 & B4 LF1 Figure 1: H*(10) for each bi-layer sample and the lead free composite material normalised to the H*(10) for 0.25 mm lead foil. Red bars RxBx (lead closest to tube), blue bars BxRx (antimony closest to tube), grey bar LF1 (lead free composite). skin dose / skin dose for 0.25 mm Pb 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 RxBx BxRx R1 & B7 R2 & B6 R3 & B5 R4 & B4 LF1 Figure 2: H (0.07) for each bi-layer sample and the lead free composite material normalised to the H (0.07) for 0.25 mm lead foil. Red bars RxBx (lead closest to tube), blue bars BxRx (antimony closest to tube), grey bar LF1 (lead composite). Discussion and conclusions These results suggest that using the bi-layer samples with antimony at the tube side can result in a reduction in effective dose of up to 20% compared with 0.25 mm lead foil. By contrast, the lead-free composite material was found to increase effective dose by approximately 20% compared with a lead foil 0.25 mm thick

KIARMOR: A new STANDARD OF RADIATION PROTECTION The lightest and most flexible radiation protection material available Provides 20% greater protection against absorbed dose when compared to Standard Lead products Provides 40% greater protection against absorbed dose when compared to Lead-free, or low-lead composites Tested and certified to IEC 61331-1:1994; IEC 61331-1:2013/2014 (Draft); ASTM F2547-06 and DIN 6857-1, designed specifically to test Lead-free and low-lead composites National physical laboratory test results & Certification KIARMOR Bi-layer materials have been tested and certified by the National Physical Laboratory against the following standards: IEC 61331-1:1994 DIN 6857-1 IEC61331-1:2013/2014 (Draft) Also tested and certified against ASTM F2547-06

CERTIFICATIONS NPL Page 2

TERMS Absorbed Dose: All X-Ray procedures expose people to a quantity of radiation. Absorbed dose describes the measure of ionizing radiation that remains in the body or organs. A 0.25mm LE Apron allows approximately 10% penetration of source radiation (90% attenuation). At 0.5mm LE this becomes 2% (98% attenuation). The difference is five times - or 500%. KIARMOR s ultra-lightweight, Lead-free composition lets medical personnel work longer, with the highest level of protection at a fraction of the weight. Infab Corporation 1040 Avenida Acaso Camarillo, CA, USA 93012 Phone: 805-987-5255 Fax: 805-482-8424 Contact Us M-F 6:30am-5pm PDT sales@infabcorp.com www.infabcorp.com Bi-Layer Technology: KIARMOR s unique design and production methodology creates a Bi-Layer material tested by KI GLOBAL in partnership with world-leading health, science and technology partners. Kiarmor is made from one homogeneous layer of two distinct, Lead-free materials and is certified by the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) for use by interventional radiologists, cardiologists and healthcare professionals working with radiation in hospitals worldwide.