Lecture 25 (Dec. 6, 2017)

Similar documents
Physics 324, Fall Dirac Notation. These notes were produced by David Kaplan for Phys. 324 in Autumn 2001.

5.74 TIME-DEPENDENT QUANTUM MECHANICS

Physics 232 Gauge invariance of the magnetic susceptibilty

The time evolution of the state of a quantum system is described by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE): ( ) ( ) 2m "2 + V ( r,t) (1.

Quantum Theory Assignment 3

Hydrogen (atoms, molecules) in external fields. Static electric and magnetic fields Oscyllating electromagnetic fields

Assignment 2 Solutions SOLUTION. ϕ 1 Â = 3 ϕ 1 4i ϕ 2. The other case can be dealt with in a similar way. { ϕ 2 Â} χ = { 4i ϕ 1 3 ϕ 2 } χ.

PHY4905: Nearly-Free Electron Model (NFE)

1 Adiabatic and diabatic representations

5.80 Small-Molecule Spectroscopy and Dynamics

5.76 Lecture #33 5/08/91 Page 1 of 10 pages. Lecture #33: Vibronic Coupling

HE ATOM & APPROXIMATION METHODS MORE GENERAL VARIATIONAL TREATMENT. Examples:

Perturbation Theory, Zeeman Effect, Stark Effect

1. Hydrogen Atom: 3p State

Chapter 8 Approximation Methods, Hueckel Theory

Lecture #5: Begin Quantum Mechanics: Free Particle and Particle in a 1D Box

X. Perturbation Theory

Lecture 14 and 15: Algebraic approach to the SHO. 1 Algebraic Solution of the Oscillator 1. 2 Operator manipulation and the spectrum 4

+ au n+1 + bu n = 0.)

1. Szabo & Ostlund: 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, 2.5, 2.7. These problems are fairly straightforward and I will not discuss them here.

Quantum Mechanics I. 21 April, x=0. , α = A + B = C. ik 1 A ik 1 B = αc.

COURSE INTRODUCTION: WHAT HAPPENS TO A QUANTUM PARTICLE ON A PENDULUM π 2 SECONDS AFTER IT IS TOSSED IN?

mx bx kx F t. dt IR I LI V t, Q LQ RQ V t,

6.3 Testing Series With Positive Terms

Apply change-of-basis formula to rewrite x as a linear combination of eigenvectors v j.

Chapter Vectors

Lanczos-Haydock Recursion

, then cv V. Differential Equations Elements of Lineaer Algebra Name: Consider the differential equation. and y2 cos( kx)

The Born-Oppenheimer approximation

Office: JILA A709; Phone ;

Exercises and Problems

Physics 7440, Solutions to Problem Set # 8

Representations of State Vectors and Operators

In the preceding Chapters, the mathematical ideas underpinning the quantum theory have been

C191 - Lecture 2 - Quantum states and observables

5.61 Fall 2013 Problem Set #3

Chapter 5 APPROXIMATION METHODS FOR STATIONARY STATES

The Riemann Zeta Function

Chapter 5 Vibrational Motion

Math 210A Homework 1

Perturbation Theory I (See CTDL , ) Last time: derivation of all matrix elements for Harmonic-Oscillator: x, p, H. n ij n.

Physics 2D Lecture Slides Lecture 25: Mar 2 nd

Quantum Annealing for Heisenberg Spin Chains

Recursive Algorithms. Recurrences. Recursive Algorithms Analysis

Lecture 8: October 20, Applications of SVD: least squares approximation

Stochastic Matrices in a Finite Field

Appendix: The Laplace Transform

Physics 2D Lecture Slides Lecture 22: Feb 22nd 2005

8.3 Perturbation theory

Vibrational Spectroscopy 1

8.512 Theory of Solids II Spring 2009

Chapter 4. Fourier Series

Last time, we talked about how Equation (1) can simulate Equation (2). We asserted that Equation (2) can also simulate Equation (1).

Ma 530 Infinite Series I

1 Last time: similar and diagonalizable matrices

PAPER : IIT-JAM 2010

Zeros of Polynomials

Summary: CORRELATION & LINEAR REGRESSION. GC. Students are advised to refer to lecture notes for the GC operations to obtain scatter diagram.

3/21/2017. Commuting and Non-commuting Operators Chapter 17. A a

Math 61CM - Solutions to homework 3

The Heisenberg versus the Schrödinger picture in quantum field theory. Dan Solomon Rauland-Borg Corporation 3450 W. Oakton Skokie, IL USA

10 More general formulation of quantum mechanics

PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION Department of Physics University of Florida Part A, January, 2016, 09:00 12:00. Instructions

Inverse Matrix. A meaning that matrix B is an inverse of matrix A.

Math 155 (Lecture 3)

The Transition Dipole Moment

Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors

1 Approximating Integrals using Taylor Polynomials

The Transition Dipole Moment

b i u x i U a i j u x i u x j

M A T H F A L L CORRECTION. Algebra I 1 4 / 1 0 / U N I V E R S I T Y O F T O R O N T O

Section 11.8: Power Series

The picture in figure 1.1 helps us to see that the area represents the distance traveled. Figure 1: Area represents distance travelled

Generalized Semi- Markov Processes (GSMP)

MIT Department of Chemistry 5.74, Spring 2005: Introductory Quantum Mechanics II Instructor: Professor Andrei Tokmakoff

( ) Time-Independent Perturbation Theory. Michael Fowler 2/16/06

Lecture #18

Chapter 9 - CD companion 1. A Generic Implementation; The Common-Merge Amplifier. 1 τ is. ω ch. τ io

LECTURE 14. Non-linear transverse motion. Non-linear transverse motion

MATH 304: MIDTERM EXAM SOLUTIONS

9.3 The INTEGRAL TEST; p-series

Math Solutions to homework 6

Math 116 Second Midterm November 13, 2017

2.004 Dynamics and Control II Spring 2008

PATH INTEGRAL for the HARMONIC OSCILLATOR

TIME-CORRELATION FUNCTIONS

LECTURE 8: ORTHOGONALITY (CHAPTER 5 IN THE BOOK)

(3) If you replace row i of A by its sum with a multiple of another row, then the determinant is unchanged! Expand across the i th row:

ECE-S352 Introduction to Digital Signal Processing Lecture 3A Direct Solution of Difference Equations

PHYC - 505: Statistical Mechanics Homework Assignment 4 Solutions

Machine Learning for Data Science (CS 4786)

CHAPTER 5. Theory and Solution Using Matrix Techniques

18.657: Mathematics of Machine Learning

New Version of the Rayleigh Schrödinger Perturbation Theory: Examples

MATH10212 Linear Algebra B Proof Problems

Z ß cos x + si x R du We start with the substitutio u = si(x), so du = cos(x). The itegral becomes but +u we should chage the limits to go with the ew

Probability, Expectation Value and Uncertainty

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

subcaptionfont+=small,labelformat=parens,labelsep=space,skip=6pt,list=0,hypcap=0 subcaption ALGEBRAIC COMBINATORICS LECTURE 8 TUESDAY, 2/16/2016

Jaynes-Cummings Model

Transcription:

Lecture 5 8.31 Quatum Theory I, Fall 017 106 Lecture 5 (Dec. 6, 017) 5.1 Degeerate Perturbatio Theory Previously, whe discussig perturbatio theory, we restricted ourselves to the case where the uperturbed eergy levels were ot degeerate. We will ow cosider the case where the uperturbed Hamiltoia has degeeracies. Suppose the eigestate 0 is degeerate with k 0, i.e., E,0 = E k,0. We clearly caot use the formula from last class for the first-order correctio to the eigestate, m0 m 0 V 0 = 0 + λ, (5.1) E,0 E m,0 m because the deomiator vaishes at m = k. The solutio is to restrict our attetio to the degeerate subspace ad the diagoalize the perturbatio o this subspace. Withi the subspace of degeerate states of the uperturbed Hamiltoia of eergy E,0 (referred to as the degeerate maifold of E,0 ), we diagoalize V. Withi this subspace, H 0 1 by defiitio (sice every state i this space has the same eergy eigevalue). Thus, P H 0 P 1, where P is the projector oto the degeerate subspace, ad so P H 0 P commutes with P V P. We ca the diagoalize the projected V simultaeously with the projected H 0. I the orthoormal basis that diagoalizes P V P, the off-diagoal matrix elemets of P V P are zero, so we ca retur to usig the formulas of ordiary perturbatio theory. The terms where E,0 E k,0 vaish do ot occur, as the umerator also vaishes. 5.1.1 Liear Stark Effect As a example, cosider a atom i a electric field. I the case of a hydroge atom, we foud that the eergy of the electro i the atom chaged quadratically i the electric field (for small electric field). This was the pheomeo kow as the quadratic Stark effect. Now we will discuss a situatio i which the eergy chages liearly i the applied electric field. Let us choose E = Eẑ. Now, we cosider the = levels of a hydrogeic atom. There are four degeerate states (igorig spi) of the form, l, m, which are, 1, 1,, 1, 0,, 1, 1,, 0, 0 }{{}}{{}. (5.) p Our perturbatio is V = ee z. Cosider V i the subspace of the four = levels. We eed to compute, l, m z, l, m. (5.3) Because [z, J z ] = 0, we have Thus, 0 =, l, m (zj z J z z), l, m = (m m ), l, m z, l, m. (5.4) Note also that uder parity, z z, so, l, m z, l, m = 0, if m m. (5.5) i.e., we will oly fid a o-vaishig matrix elemet for l l. s, l, m z, l, m = 0, (5.6)

Lecture 5 8.31 Quatum Theory I, Fall 017 107 Thus, the oly o-vaishig matrix elemets are, 1, 0 z, 0, 0 =, 0, 0 z, 1, 0. (5.7) We ca compute these etries exactly, because we kow the hydroge atom wavefuctios. Explicitly, we fid 0 3ea 0E 0 0 V = 3ea 0E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, (5.8) 0 0 0 0 where a 0 is the Bohr radius. This matrix has eigevalues 0, 0, ±3ea 0 E. Sp ecifically, the states, 1, 1 ad, 1, 1 have o eergy shift, while the state (, 0, 0 +, 1, 0 )/ has shift +3ea 0 E ad the state (, 0, 0, 1, 0 )/ has shift 3ea 0 E. This eergy shift is liear i the stregth of the electric field, hece the effect is called the liear Stark effect. I geeral, it may be the case that diagoalizig V i the space of degeerate states does ot split the degeeracy. I such a case, we must go to higher order i perturbatio theory, util we are able to successfully split the degeeracy, after which poit we ca proceed by o-degeerate perturbatio theory. If P V P does ot split the degeeracy, the at the ext order we will be cosiderig operators of the form 5. Time-Depedet Perturbatio Theory V m m V P V P + P P. (5.9) m E 0 E m E 0 E m We ow cosider time-depedet perturbatios to the Hamiltoia. We begi with the Schrödiger equatio, d i ψ d ψ(t) = t H (t), (5.10) with H = H 0 + H 1 (t), (5.11) where H 0 has a kow spectrum ad H 1 is some weak, time-depedet perturbatio. We may wat to compute the probability that the iitial H 0 eigestate i trasitios to the fial H 0 eigestate f i time t. If H 1 = 0, the the solutio to the Schrödiger equatio is of the form ψ(t) = c 0, (5.1) e ie,0 t/ where the c are time-idepedet. If H 1 (t) 0, the there is additioal time depedece comig from the perturbatio; we ca still expad ay state i the basis of uperturbed eergy eigestates, so we ca write the solutios to the Schrödiger equatio i the form ψ(t) = c (t)e ie,0t/ 0, (5.13) where the coefficiets c (t) are ow fuctios of time. We could absorb the time depedece i the expoetial ito the coefficiets c (t), but it is otatioally coveiet ot to do so. Applyig the Schrödiger equatio to Eq. (5.13), (i t H 0 H 1 ) ψ(t) = 0, (5.14)

Lecture 5 8.31 Quatum Theory I, Fall 017 108 we are left with Takig the ier product with we arrive at where ie [i t c (t) H1(t)c (t)]e,0t/ 0 = 0. (5.15) f 0 e ie f t/ 0, (5.16) dc f i = f iω f t 0 H 1 (t) 0 e c (t), (5.17) dt E f,0 E, 0 ωf =. (5.18) We ca recogize this as a cocrete example of workig i the iteractio picture; we have removed the time-depedece due to the uperturbed Hamiltoia, so the oly time-depedece we see remaiig comes from H 1. What we have doe so far is exact. We ow assume that ψ(t = t 0 ) = i ad solve perturbatively i H 1. I the iitial state, c (t = t 0 ) = δ i. (5.19) At first order, we the have which ca be itegrated to yield dc f dt = i f H (t) i e iω fit, (5.0) 0 1 0 i c fi = δ fi ˆ t iω f it 0 e dt f0 H1( t ) i. (5.1) t 0 This is the trasitio amplitude betwee the states i 0 ad f 0 to first order i the perturbatio H 1. 5..1 SHO i a Time-Depedet Electric Field Cosider a simple harmoic oscillator i a time-depedet electric field ɛ(t) = ɛ 0 e t /τ. (5.) The Hamiltoia is p H = + 1 mω x exɛ(t). (5.3) m If our iitial state is the groud state, i = 0, the we wat to compute the trasitio amplitude to the state after a time t. To first order, we fid this probability to be P 0 (t) = Here, we have used E,0 E = 0,0 ω 1 P 0 (t ) = ˆ 1 t dt H 1 (t ) 0 e iωt, 0. (5.4) for the SHO. I the limit t, this becomes ˆ dt H 1 (t ) 0 e iωt, 0. (5.5)

Lecture 5 8.31 Quatum Theory I, Fall 017 109 We ca write the perturbatio i the form ( H 1 (t) = eɛ(t) a + a ), (5.6) mω ad so we fid P 0 (t ) = e mω ˆ d t ɛ ( t ) e iωt a + a ) 0 (, 0. (5.7) Because a 0 = 0 ad a 0 = 1, we see that to this order, P 0 = 0 for > 1. For = 1, we fid e ˆ P 0 1 (t ) = mω = πe ɛ 0 τ e ω τ /4. mω dt e iωt ɛ 0 e t /τ (5.8) If we work to higher orders, we will fid ozero trasitios to higher excitatio states. Note that P 0 1 is small both for ωτ 1 (slow pulse) ad ωτ 1 (fast pulse), ad peaks whe ωτ 1. 5.. Secod-Order Trasitio Amplitude Iteratig the solutio for c (t) to ext order, we fid where ( ) i ˆ t ˆ t (t) = dt c () m t0 t0 Icorporatig the higher-order terms, the trasitio probability is dt e iωmt H (t )e iω mit 1,m H 1,mi (t ), (5.9) H 1,jk (t) = j H 1 (t) k. (5.30) P i = c (1) () ( t) + c (t) +. (5.31)

MIT OpeCourseWare https://ocw.mit.edu 8.31 Quatum Theory I Fall 017 For iformatio about citig these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: https://ocw.mit.edu/terms.