Low energy electrons in the inner Earth s magnetosphere

Similar documents
Specification of electron radiation environment at GEO and MEO for surface charging estimates

Specification of electron radiation environment at GEO and MEO for surface charging estimates

Low energy electron radiation environment for extreme events

Substorm-associated effects in the variations of low energy electron fluxes in the inner magnetosphere: Does the substorm s strength matter?

Advanced modeling of low energy electrons responsible for surface charging

Low energy electrons at MEO during observed surface charging events

Natalia Ganushkina (1, 2), Stepan Dubyagin (1), Ilkka Sillanpää (1)

Metrics of model performance for electron fluxes (<200 kev) at geostationary orbit

Surface Charging. J.C. Matéo-Vélez, A. Sicard, J.F. Roussel

Ion heating during geomagnetic storms measured using energetic neutral atom imaging. Amy Keesee

How is Earth s Radiation Belt Variability Controlled by Solar Wind Changes

Vania K. Jordanova Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA

Multi Spacecraft Observation of Compressional Mode ULF Waves Excitation and Relativistic Electron Acceleration

2-2-3 Prediction of the Plasma Environment in the Geostationary Orbit Using the Magnetosphere Simulation

Stormtime Dynamics of the Magnetosphere near Geosynchronous Altitudes

Electron Acceleration and Loss in the Earth s Radiation Belts: The Contribution of Wave- particle Interactions

NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center Data and Services. Terry Onsager and Howard Singer NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center

Differences between CME associated and CH associated RED events during 2005

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 115, A01205, doi: /2009ja014423, 2010

This project has received funding from the European Union s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie-Sklodowska-Curie grant

Radiation Belt Sources and Losses Driven by Solar Wind Variability

RELATIVISTIC ELECTRONS AND ULF-ACTIVITY DYNAMICS DURING CIR- AND CME-STORMS IN MAY 2005

DYNAMICS OF THE EARTH S MAGNETOSPHERE

Substorms at Mercury: Old Questions and New Insights. Daniel N. Baker Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (LASP)

BIRA-IASB, 30th October 2006

Myagkova I.N., Panasyuk M.I., Kalegaev V.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow

DIN EN : (E)

MODELING PARTICLE INJECTIONS TEST PARTICLE SIMULATIONS. Xinlin Li LASP, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO , USA

INTERPLANETARY ASPECTS OF SPACE WEATHER

PROJECT FINAL REPORT

The Physics of Space Plasmas

Large enhancement of the outer belt electrons during magnetic storms

Geomagnetic Disturbance Report Reeve Observatory

Chapter 8 Geospace 1

The Los Alamos Laboratory: Space Weather Research and Data

Features of energetic particle radial profiles inferred from geosynchronous responses to solar wind dynamic pressure enhancements

Evolution of the proton ring current energy distribution during April 2001 storm

Magnetospheric currents during sawtooth events: Event-oriented magnetic field model analysis

The importance of solar wind magnetic. the upcoming Sunjammer solar sail. field observations & mission

Internal Charging Hazards in Near-Earth Space during Solar Cycle 24 Maximum: Van Allen Probes Measurements

Geomagnetic Disturbances (GMDs) History and Prediction

Electromagnetic Fields Inside the Magnetoshpere. Outline

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 117, A00L05, doi: /2011ja017124, 2012

Solar-Wind/Magnetosphere Coupling

Plasma Processes in the Magnetosphere: Radiation Belt Response to Solar Wind Drivers

Geomagnetic storms. Measurement and forecasting

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 112, A11214, doi: /2007ja012314, 2007

Comparison of energetic ions in cusp and outer radiation belt

Relativistic electrons in the outer radiation belt: Differentiating between acceleration mechanisms

FAST Observations of Ion Outflow Associated with Magnetic Storms

bestbuy.com Mgccl.com

A Survey of Spacecraft Charging Events on the DMSP Spacecraft in LEO

Auroral Disturbances During the January 10, 1997 Magnetic Storm

Mission to Understand Electron Pitch Angle Diffusion and Characterize Precipitation Bands and Spikes. J. F. Fennell 1 and P. T.

In-Situ vs. Remote Sensing

NASA s Contribution to International Living With a Star

RING CURRENT DYNAMICS DURING THE JULY 2000 STORM PERIOD

Science Overview. Vassilis Angelopoulos, ELFIN PI

Geosynchronous magnetic field response to solar wind dynamic pressure pulse

The Los Alamos Dynamic Radiation Environment Assimilation Model (DREAM) for Space Weather Specification and Forecasting

Global Monitoring of the Terrestrial Ring Current

A Semi-Empirical Model for Forecasting Relativistic Electrons at Geostationary Orbit

Energetic neutral atom response to solar wind dynamic pressure enhancements

Rationale for a European Space Weather Programme

Internal charging simulation at a Galileo like orbit Effect of the anisotropic shielding and of the environment definition

Relativistic Solar Electrons - where and how are they formed?

EFFECT OF SOLAR AND INTERPLANETARY DISTURBANCES ON SPACE WEATHER

Drift-bounce resonance between Pc5 wave and ions: Arase and MMS study

The Solar wind - magnetosphere - ionosphere interaction

Long-term evolution of magnetospheric current systems during storms

Space Weather Effects of Coronal Mass Ejection

Record Charging Events from Applied Technology Satellite 6

Linear Prediction Filter Analysis of Relativistic Electron Properties at 6.6 R E

An isolated substorm is caused by a brief (30-60 min) pulse of southward IMF.

Dawn/Dusk Dropouts due to Storms/Substorms Near the Outer Radiation Belt: Observations from CRRES

A NEW MODEL FOR REALISTIC 3-D SIMULATIONS OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLE EVENTS

ARTICLE IN PRESS. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics

The Physics of Space Plasmas

COMPARISON OF PC5 GEOMAGNETIC PULSATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH CIR-DRIVEN AND CME-DRIVEN STORMS. O. V. Kozyreva and N.G. Kleimenova

The Dynamic Magnetosphere. Ioannis A. Daglis. National Observatory of Athens, Greece

SPACECRAFT CHARGING: OBSERVATIONS AND RELATIONSHIP TO SATELLITE ANOMALIES

First European Space Weather Week. Space weather - atmospheres, drag, global change future needs. 29 November-3 December 2004

Relative contribution of electrons to the stormtime total ring current energy content

Low Hanging Fruit. Large-Scale Dynamics & Structure

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 111, A11S04, doi: /2006ja011703, 2006

Ring current simulations of the 90 intense storms during solar cycle 23

cos 6 λ m sin 2 λ m Mirror Point latitude Equatorial Pitch Angle Figure 5.1: Mirror point latitude as function of equatorial pitch angle.

PC index as a standard of magnetospheric disturbances in the auroral zone

Modeling magnetospheric current response to solar wind dynamic pressure enhancements during magnetic storms: 2. Application to different storm phases

Applica'on of NARMAX methodology to the forecast of radia'on environment in the Geospace.

Reduction of Trapped Energetic Particle Fluxes in Earth and Jupiter Radiation Belts

European SpaceCraft for the study of Atmospheric Particle Escape: Follow-on missions

Simulations of inner magnetosphere dynamics with an expanded RAM-SCB model and comparisons with Van Allen Probes observations

Sun Earth Connection Missions

THE SOLAR WIND & SOLAR VARIABILITY

Storm-dependent radiation belt electron dynamics

Effect of CME Events of Geomagnetic Field at Indian Station Alibag and Pondicherry

The Structure of the Magnetosphere

Relation of substorm disturbances triggered by abrupt solar-wind changes to physics of plasma sheet transport

Time history effects at the magnetopause: Hysteresis in power input and its implications to substorm processes

Transcription:

Low energy electrons in the inner Earth s magnetosphere Natalia Ganushkina (1, 2) (1) University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI, USA (2) Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland The research leading to these results was partly funded by the European Union s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 637302 PROGRESS Fundamental Physical Processes in Solar-Terrestrial Research and Their Relevance to Planetary Physics, January 8-12, 2018, Kona, Hawaii

What is the interest in studying kev electrons in the inner magnetosphere? The distribution of low energy electrons population (10 to few hundreds of kev) constitutes the seed population further accelerated to MeV energies, critically important for radiation belt dynamics Energetic charged particles trapped in the radiation belts are a major source of damaging space weather effects on space- and ground-based assets. Surface charging by electrons with < 100 kev can cause significant damage and spacecraft anomalies electrostatic discharges causing EM interferences or local degradations, sustained arcs and system or mission destruction in the worst cases. Individual examples of permanent losses due to charging in orbit: - loss of the Japanese spacecraft ADEOS-II - 8 month outage and drift of Galaxy 15 - large permanent power losses on PanAmSat 6 and Tempo 2 spacecraft

Non-storm variations of low energy electron fluxes at geostationary orbit Rather quiet event

5-50 kev electrons during quiet event The data: AMC 12 geostationary satellite, CEASE-II (Compact Environmental Anomaly Sensor) instrument with Electrostatic Analyzer (ESA) for measuring low energy electron fluxes in 10 channels, 5-50 kev. midnight - Flux increases are related to AE peaks only (less than 200 nt, small, isolated substorms) - The lower the energy, the large the flux - Electrons of different channels behaves differently: - 1st peak (AE=200 nt) at midnight seen for energies > 11 kev - 2nd peak (AE=120 nt) at dawn, increase in all energies Not a unique case

CIR-driven storm High Speed Stream IMF Bz oscillations pressure peak in front of HSS substorm activity Small, CIR-driven storm with Dst of 75 nt, IMF Bz of -5-10 nt, Vsw from 350 to 650 km/s, Psw peak at 8 npa, AE peaks of 800-1200 nt small storm long recovery

Similar increase in electron fluxes during AE = 400 nt and AE=1200 nt Small, CIR-driven storm with Dst of 75 nt, IMF Bz of -5-10 nt, Vsw from 350 to 650 km/s, Psw peak at 8 npa, AE peaks of 800-1200 nt AMC12 electron data - peaks in both 15-50 kev and 5-15 kev electron fluxes show correlation with AE - 2 orders of magnitude increase - all energies increase at midnight, when AE is only 200 nt - same order of increase for AE = 800 nt and even for 1200 nt

Analysis of LANL data Matéo-Vélez et al., Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2016, Matéo-Vélez et al., Space Weather, 2017 15 years of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) data at GEO from September 1989 to November, 2005 from 6 spinning satellites: 1989-046, 1990-095, 1991-080, 1994-084, LANL-97A and LANL-02A. LANL data (ions and e-) used: MPA: from 100 ev to 40 kev SOPA: from 50 kev to 1.3 MeV ESP: from 1 to several MeV The time resolution used is 86 seconds. The spacecraft potential routinely provided by LANL The best correlation with potentials is for 10-50 kev electrons (consistent with the 8 kev and 9 kev thresholds from Thomsen et al. [2013], Ferguson et al. [2015] The 10 to 50 kev electron flux thresholds as an indicator of surface charging risks at GEO.

Four criteria for worst-case environments from LANL data Criteria for defining severe conditions developed based on integral fluxes and measured spacecraft potential. Fluxes averaged over 15 minutes, because severe conditions need to remain over a few minutes for differential charging to occur in geosynchronous orbit. (FE10k): highest Fluxes of electrons at Energies above 10 kev (HFAE): Highest Fluxes at All Energies (high fluxes at both <50 kev and > 200 kev which is related to charge deposited both at the surface and in the bulk of covering insulators); (LFHE) : high fluxes at low energies together with a Low Flux at High Energy (high fluxes at <50 kev and low fluxes at >200 kev which is related to surface charging); (PG5k) : longest events with a Potential Greater than 5 kv (in absolute) (events associated with large negative potential with plenty of time for differential charging to occur). 400 events with worst-case environments were identified Comparison done with guidelines given by 1. Standard ECSS-E-20-06 Spacecraft charging of European Cooperation for Space Standardization, https://www.spacewx.com/docs/ecss-e-st-10-04c_15nov2008.pdf 2. NASA-HDBK-4002A Mitigating In-Space Charging Effects Guidelines, http://standards.globalspec.com/std/1309224/nasa-hdbk-4002

Surface charging events vs. geomagnetic conditions FE10k events: all storm phases and intense isolated substorms; HFAE events: substorms; LFHE events: equally distributed between storms and substorm periods; PG5k events: storm recovery and moderate substorms. These results show that it is not necessary to have extreme conditions to get severe spacecraft surface charging. Matéo Vélez et al., Space Weather, 2017

Inner Magnetosphere Particle Transport and Acceleration Model The inner magnetosphere particle transport and acceleration model: - follows distributions of ions and electrons with arbitrary pitch angles - from the plasma sheet to the inner L-shell regions - with energies reaching up to hundreds of kevs - in time-dependent magnetic and electric fields. - distribution of particles is traced in the guiding center, or drift, approximation In order to follow the evolution of the particle distribution function f and particle fluxes in the inner magnetosphere dependent on the position, time, energy, and pitch angle, it is necessary to specify: (1) particle distribution at initial time at the model boundary; (2) magnetic and electric fields everywhere dependent on time; (3) drift velocities; (3) all sources and losses of particles. Magnetic field model: TS05 (Dst, Psw, IMF By and Bz, and Wi, i = 1, 6) Electric field model: Boyle (Vsw, IMF B, By, Bz) Boundary conditions: n and T by Dubyagin et al. (2016) (Vsw, IMF Bz, Nsw) Losses given as electron lifetimes: newly developed BAS lower and upper band chorus diffusion model (Kp, magnetospheric magnetic field)

kev electrons in real time online (IMPTAM model) IMPTAM database prepare to plot imptam.fmi.fi http://csem.engin.umich.edu/tools/imptam/

Severe Events for Surface Charging: May 29, 2003 IMPTAM electron fluxes at LANL surface charging event at GEO IMPTAM electron fluxes at maximum flux at MEO Top 100 15 minutes worst case of HFAE, at LANL-1994-084 at 150106 UT, 0.7 MLT; prolonged Dst<0, intense substorm, AE of 2000 nt. IMPTAM fluxes globally reproduce LANL Max IMPTAM electron flux at MEO exceeds GEO flux and ECSS and NASA worst-cases by a factor of 2 to 5.

Dst, nt Psw, npa Vsw, km/s IMF Bz, nt IMF By, nt IMF Bx, nt 120 80 40 0-40 40 0-40 -80 80 0-80 2000 1000 80 60 40 20 0 400 300 200 100 0 200 0-200 -400-600 Nsw, cm -3 Large CME-driven storm, July 23-24, 2012 (event that missed the Earth) July 23-24, 2012 0 6 12 18 24 6 12 18 24 6 12 18 24 July 23 July 24 July 25 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) Dst = -500 nt, Psw=300 npa, Vsw = 3000 km/s 1st Dst drop Dst min STEREO-A observations, Wang-Sheerley-Arge, ENLIL model, Temerin and Li (2006) Dst predictive model Magnetosphere becomes so compressed on the dayside and so stretched on the nightside that electrons are lost, they happen to be on larger L-shells.

Extreme Events for Surface Charging: July 23-24, 2012 In the beginning of the storm IMPTAM was able to output reasonable electron fluxes at closed magnetic field lines in the inner magnetosphere. The maximum electron flux reached at GEO: July 23, 2012, at 1920 UT at MLT 2.4. Max IMPTAM electron flux at MEO is 6 times higher than that for the similar type of the event (beginning of the storm main phase on April 5, 2004). The flux is also well above the ECSS and NASA worst-cases. The maximum electron flux reached at MEO: July 23, 2012, at 2040 UT, 6.4 MLT.

Summary kev electrons vary significantly with geomagnetic activity. It is challending to model them accurately. It is NOT necessary to have even a moderate storm for significant surface charging event to happen. Substorms are important. All types of the worst-case surface charging events developed based on the analysis of LANL particle data at GEO were modeled using IMPTAM for electrons within 1-100 kev IMPTAM electron fluxes are comparable to the observed fluxes by LANL at GEO Max IMPTAM electron flux at MEO exceeds the GEO flux and the ECSS and NASA standards for worst-cases by a factor of 2 to 10. The event that missed the Earth on July 23-24, 2012 is the kind of space weather extreme conditions that could significantly overpass the ECSS and NASA standards. Caution is advised due to the difficulty of modeling of such events.